aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c26
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/plan/initsplan.c18
2 files changed, 32 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c
index 357ee5399c7..3d4bc2530c5 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c
@@ -459,20 +459,26 @@ join_is_legal(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2,
}
else
{
+ /*
+ * Otherwise, the proposed join overlaps the RHS but isn't a valid
+ * implementation of this SJ. It might still be a legal join,
+ * however, if it does not overlap the LHS.
+ */
+ if (bms_overlap(joinrelids, sjinfo->min_lefthand))
+ return false;
+
/*----------
- * Otherwise, the proposed join overlaps the RHS but isn't
- * a valid implementation of this SJ. It might still be
- * a legal join, however. If both inputs overlap the RHS,
- * assume that it's OK. Since the inputs presumably got past
- * this function's checks previously, they can't overlap the
- * LHS and their violations of the RHS boundary must represent
- * SJs that have been determined to commute with this one.
+ * If both inputs overlap the RHS, assume that it's OK. Since the
+ * inputs presumably got past this function's checks previously,
+ * their violations of the RHS boundary must represent SJs that
+ * have been determined to commute with this one.
* We have to allow this to work correctly in cases like
* (a LEFT JOIN (b JOIN (c LEFT JOIN d)))
* when the c/d join has been determined to commute with the join
* to a, and hence d is not part of min_righthand for the upper
* join. It should be legal to join b to c/d but this will appear
* as a violation of the upper join's RHS.
+ *
* Furthermore, if one input overlaps the RHS and the other does
* not, we should still allow the join if it is a valid
* implementation of some other SJ. We have to allow this to
@@ -488,11 +494,13 @@ join_is_legal(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2,
bms_overlap(rel1->relids, sjinfo->min_righthand) &&
bms_overlap(rel2->relids, sjinfo->min_righthand))
{
- /* seems OK */
- Assert(!bms_overlap(joinrelids, sjinfo->min_lefthand));
+ /* both overlap; assume OK */
}
else
+ {
+ /* one overlaps, the other doesn't (or it's a semijoin) */
is_valid_inner = false;
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/initsplan.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/initsplan.c
index 5328f19afea..4ab3a6ea42b 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/initsplan.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/initsplan.c
@@ -641,6 +641,20 @@ make_outerjoininfo(PlannerInfo *root,
min_righthand = bms_int_members(bms_union(clause_relids, inner_join_rels),
right_rels);
+ /*
+ * If we have a degenerate join clause that doesn't mention any RHS rels,
+ * force the min RHS to be the syntactic RHS; otherwise we can end up
+ * making serious errors, like putting the LHS on the wrong side of an
+ * outer join. It seems to be safe to not do this when we have a
+ * contribution from inner_join_rels, though; that's enough to pin the SJ
+ * to occur at a reasonable place in the tree.
+ */
+ if (bms_is_empty(min_righthand))
+ min_righthand = bms_copy(right_rels);
+
+ /*
+ * Now check previous outer joins for ordering restrictions.
+ */
foreach(l, root->join_info_list)
{
SpecialJoinInfo *otherinfo = (SpecialJoinInfo *) lfirst(l);
@@ -742,12 +756,10 @@ make_outerjoininfo(PlannerInfo *root,
* If we found nothing to put in min_lefthand, punt and make it the full
* LHS, to avoid having an empty min_lefthand which will confuse later
* processing. (We don't try to be smart about such cases, just correct.)
- * Likewise for min_righthand.
+ * We already forced min_righthand nonempty, so nothing to do for that.
*/
if (bms_is_empty(min_lefthand))
min_lefthand = bms_copy(left_rels);
- if (bms_is_empty(min_righthand))
- min_righthand = bms_copy(right_rels);
/* Now they'd better be nonempty */
Assert(!bms_is_empty(min_lefthand));