| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the test script die()d before running the first test, the whole test
was interpreted as SKIPped rather than failed. The PostgreSQL::Cluster
module got this right.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fb898a70-3a88-4629-88e9-f2375020061d@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the OpenLDAP installation directory is not found, set $setup to 0
so that the LDAP tests are skipped. The macOS checks were already
doing that, but the checks on other OS's were not. While we're at it,
improve the error message when the tests are skipped, to specify
whether the OS is supported at all, or if we just didn't find the
installation directory.
This was accidentally "working" without this, i.e. we were skipping
the tests if the OpenLDAP installation was not found, because of a bug
in the LdapServer test module: the END block clobbered the exit code
so if the script die()s before running the first subtest, the whole
test script was marked as SKIPped. The next commit will fix that bug,
but we need to fix the setup code first.
These checks should probably go into configure/meson, but this is
better than nothing and allows fixing the bug in the END block.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fb898a70-3a88-4629-88e9-f2375020061d@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ecpg wants to emit a warning if it parses a SQL construct that the
backend can parse but will immediately throw a FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED
error for. The way it was testing for this was to see if the string
ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED appeared anywhere in the gram.y code.
This is, of course, not nearly good enough, as there are plenty of
rules in gram.y that throw that error only conditionally. There was
a hack dating to 2008 to suppress the warning in one rule that
doesn't even exist anymore, but nothing for other cases we've created
since then. End result was that you could get "unsupported feature
will be passed to server" warnings while compiling perfectly good SQL
code in ecpg. Somehow we'd not heard complaints about this, but
it was exposed by the recent addition of an ecpg test for a SQL/JSON
construct.
To fix, suppress the warning if the rule contains any "if" statement.
Manual comparison of gram.y with the generated preproc.y file shows
that the warning is now emitted only in rules where it's sensible.
This problem has existed for a long time, so back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/603615.1712245382@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No configured-by-FDW events would result in "return" directly out of a
PG_TRY block, making the exception stack dangling. Repair.
Oversight in commit 501cfd07d; back-patch to v14, like that commit, but
as we do not have this issue in HEAD (cf. commit 50c67c201), no need to
apply this patch to it.
In passing, improve a comment about the handling of in-process requests
in a postgres_fdw.c function called from this function.
Alexander Pyhalov, with comment adjustment/improvement by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/425fa29a429b21b0332737c42a4fdc70%40postgrespro.ru
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Specify OldTable first, NewTable second as used by
table_relation_copy_for_cluster() and as implemented in
heapam_relation_copy_for_cluster().
Backpatch to PostgreSQL 12, where TableAmRoutine was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ME3P282MB3166860D4911AE82F92DF7C5B63F2%40ME3P282MB3166.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Author: Japin Li
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov
Backpatch-through: 12
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If temp tables have dependencies (such as sequences) then it's
possible for autovacuum's cleanup of orphan temp tables to deadlock
against an incoming backend that's trying to clean out the temp
namespace for its own use. That can happen because RemoveTempRelations'
performDeletion call can visit objects within the namespace in
an order different from the order in which a per-table deletion
will visit them.
To fix, observe that performDeletion will begin by taking an exclusive
lock on the temp namespace (even though it won't actually delete it).
So, if we can get a shared lock on the namespace, we can be sure we're
not running concurrently with RemoveTempRelations, while also not
conflicting with ordinary use of the namespace. This requires
introducing a conditional version of LockDatabaseObject, but that's no
big deal. (It's surprising we've got along without that this long.)
Report and patch by Mikhail Zhilin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c43ce028-2bc2-4865-9b89-3f706246eed5@postgrespro.ru
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we are building with openssl but USE_SSL_ENGINE didn't get set,
initialize_SSL's variable "pkey" is declared but used nowhere.
Apparently this combination hasn't been exercised in the buildfarm
before now, because I've not seen this warning before, even though
the code has been like this a long time. Move the declaration
to silence the warning (and remove its useless initialization).
Per buildfarm member sawshark. Back-patch to all supported branches.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The "pltargs" variable wasn't marked volatile, which makes it unsafe
to change its value within the PG_TRY block. It looks like the worst
outcome would be to fail to release a refcount on Py_None during an
(improbable) error exit, which would likely go unnoticed in the field.
Still, it's a bug. A one-liner fix could be to mark pltargs volatile,
but on the whole it seems cleaner to arrange things so that we don't
change its value within PG_TRY.
Per report from Xing Guo. This has been there for quite awhile,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACpMh+DLrk=fDv07MNpBT4J413fDAm+gmMXgi8cjPONE+jvzuw@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This wording typo was added in PG 16.
Reported-by: s.bailey@chorusintel.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/171150077554.7105.801523271545956671@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 16
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a plain aggregate is used as a window function, and the window
frame start is specified as UNBOUNDED PRECEDING, the frame's head
cannot move so we do not need to use moving-aggregate mode. The check
for that was put into initialize_peragg(), failing to notice that
ExecInitWindowAgg() calls that function before it's filled in
winstate->frameOptions. Since makeNode() would have zeroed the field,
this didn't provoke uninitialized-value complaints, nor would the
erroneous decision have resulted in more than a little inefficiency.
Still, it's wrong, so move the initialization of
winstate->frameOptions earlier to make it work properly.
While here, also fix a thinko in a comment. Both errors crept in in
commit a9d9acbf2 which introduced the moving-aggregate mode.
Spotted by Vallimaharajan G. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18e7f2a5167.fe36253866818.977923893562469143@zohocorp.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Buildfarm member avocet has shown a plan change by switching the
finalize aggregate stage to use a GroupAggregate rather than a
HashAggregate. This is consistent with autovacuum having triggered on
the table, per analysis by Alexander Lakhin.
Fix this by disabling autovacuum on the table.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d4493a28-589a-5328-fed5-250f2d7d3e2a@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16, where this test was added.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ordinary ALTER TABLE SET SCHEMA will also move any owned sequences
into the new schema. We failed to do likewise for foreign tables,
because AlterTableNamespaceInternal believed that only certain
relkinds could have indexes, owned sequences, or constraints.
We could simply add foreign tables to that relkind list, but it
seems likely that the same oversight could be made again in
future. Instead let's remove the relkind filter altogether.
These functions shouldn't cost much when there are no objects
that they need to process, and surely this isn't an especially
performance-critical case anyway.
Per bug #18407 from Vidushi Gupta. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18407-4fd07373d252c6a0@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The musl dynamic linker saves a pointer to the process' environment
value of LD_LIBRARY_PATH very early in startup. When we move/clobber
the environment to make more room for ps status strings, we clobber
that value and thereby prevent libraries from being found via
LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which breaks the use of a temporary installation
for testing purposes. To fix, stop collecting usable space for
ps status if we notice that the variable we are about to clobber
is LD_LIBRARY_PATH. This will result in some reduction in how long
the ps status can be, but it's only likely to occur in temporary
test contexts, so it doesn't seem like a big problem. In any case,
we don't have to do it if we see we are on glibc, which surely is
where the majority of our Linux testing is done.
Thomas Munro, Bruce Momjian, and Tom Lane, per report from Wolfgang
Walther. Back-patch to all supported branches, with the hope that
we'll set up a buildfarm animal to test on this platform.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fddd1cd6-dc16-40a2-9eb5-d7fef2101488@technowledgy.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since 82a4edabd27 we can bulk extend relations. The bulk relation extension
logic has a heuristic component. Normally the heurstic does not trigger in the
occasionally-failing test case, as the relation is only extended once. But
with very small shared_buffers the limits for the number of buffers pinned at
once prevent the extension from happening at once. With the second "bulk"
extension, the heuristic kicks in, and the relation ends up one block bigger.
That's ok from a correctness perspective, but changes the results of the test
query due to one additional block.
We discussed a few more expansive fixes, but for now have decided to avoid
this by making the table a bit smaller.
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reported-by:
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/29c74104-210b-ef39-2522-27a6aa7a704f@iki.fi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230916000011.2ugpkkkp7bpp4cfh@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 16-, where the new relation extension logic was added
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The CI base image used to have a python3 with headers etc installed in PATH,
but doesn't anymore. Instead of relying on a specific version in the base
image, explicitly install one ourselves.
On 16 and HEAD this lead to a build without python support, but on 15 CI
failed, due to explicitly enabled python3 support.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1229327.1711160246@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since commit 3d14e171e9, SET ROLE has required the current session
user to have membership with the SET option in the target role, but
the SET ROLE documentation only mentions the membership
requirement. This commit adds this important detail to the SET
ROLE page.
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BRLCQysHtME0znk2KUMJN343ksboSRQSU-hCnOjesX6VK300Q%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It might happen that the varlena value wasn't compressed by index_form_tuple()
due to current storage parameters. If compression is currently enabled, we
need to compress such values to match index tuple coming from the heap.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/7bdbe559-d61a-4ae4-a6e1-48abdf3024cc%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Andrey Borodin
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin, Michael Zhilin, Jian He, Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 12
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the heap, tuples may contain short varlena datum with both 1B header and 4B
headers. But the corresponding index tuple should always have such varlena's
with 1B headers. So, for fingerprinting, we need to convert.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/7bdbe559-d61a-4ae4-a6e1-48abdf3024cc%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Michael Zhilin
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin, Andrey Borodin, Jian He, Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 12
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Up to now, all of the "catcache list" objects within a catalog cache
were just chained together on a single dlist, requiring O(N) time to
search. Remarkably, we've not had serious performance problems with
that so far; but we got a complaint of a bad performance regression
from v15 in a case with a large number of roles in the system, which
traced down to O(N^2) total time when we probed N catcache lists.
Replace that data structure with a hashtable having an enlargeable
number of dlists, in an exactly parallel way to the data structure
we've used for years for the plain CatCTup cache members. The extra
cost of maintaining a hash table seems negligible, since we were
already computing a hash value for list searches.
Normally this'd be HEAD-only material, but in view of the performance
regression it seems advisable to back-patch into v16. In the v16
version of the patch, leave the dead cc_lists field where it is and
add the new fields at the end of struct catcache, to avoid possible
ABI breakage in case any external code is looking at these structs.
(We assume no external code is actually allocating new catcache
structs.)
Per report from alex work.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGvXd3OSMbJQwOSc-Tq-Ro1CAz=vggErdSG7pv2s6vmmTOLJSg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 9a83d56b38c added support for allowing pg_dumpall to dump
roles without including passwords, which accidentally made dumps
omit COMMENTs on roles. This fixes it by using pg_authid to get
the comment.
Backpatch to all supported versions. Patch simultaneously written
independently by Álvaro and myself.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reported-by: Bartosz Chroł <bartosz.chrol@handen.pl>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AS8P194MB1271CDA0ADCA7B75FCD8E767F7332@AS8P194MB1271.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEP4nAz9V4H41_4ESJd1Gf0v%3DdevkqO1%3Dpo91jUw-GJSx8Hxqg%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: v12
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove a redundant comment, and document pg_class.reltablespace properly
in catalogs.sgml.
After commits a36c84c3e4a9, 87259588d0ab and others.
Backpatch to 12.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202403191013.w2kr7wqlamqz@alvherre.pgsql
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, bitmap heap scans only counted lossy and exact pages for
explain when there was at least one visible tuple on the page.
heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned true only if there was a
"valid" page with tuples to be processed. However, the lossy and exact
page counters in EXPLAIN should count the number of pages represented
in a lossy or non-lossy way in the constructed bitmap, regardless of
whether or not the pages ultimately contained visible tuples.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Melanie Plageman
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_ZwCwWFeL_H3ia26bP2e7HiKLWt0ZmGXPVwPO6uXq0vaA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_bxrXeZ2rCnY8LyeC2Ls88KpjWrQ%2BopUrXDRXdcfwFZGA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Given a subplan in a MERGE query, EXPLAIN would sometimes fail to
properly display expressions involving Params referencing variables in
other parts of the plan tree.
This would affect subplans outside the topmost join plan node, for
which expansion of Params would go via the top-level ModifyTable plan
node. The problem was that "inner_tlist" for the ModifyTable node's
deparse_namespace was set to the join node's targetlist, but
"inner_plan" was set to the ModifyTable node itself, rather than the
join node, leading to incorrect results when descending to the
referenced variable.
Fix and backpatch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWAv-sZuH%2BwG5xJ-%2BGt7qGNGX8wUQd3XYydMFDKgRB9nw%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit c855872074b introduced a new parameter to pg_regress to set
the directory where to look for expected files, but accidentally
only implemented it for when compiling pg_regress for ECPG tests.
Fix by adding support for the parameter to the main regression test
compilation of pg_regress as well.
Backpatch to v16 where --expecteddir was introduced.
Author: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_Xqq5yKJHcJsq__LPcKwSY0XHRqVERNWGxx5ttNXXj7+W=A@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similar to d8a295389, trim off any PathKeys which are for ORDER BY /
DISTINCT aggregate functions from the PathKey List for the Gather Merge
paths created by gather_grouping_paths(). These additional PathKeys are
not valid to use after grouping has taken place as these PathKeys belong
to columns which are inputs to an aggregate function and, therefore are
unavailable after aggregation.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cf63174c-8c89-3953-cb49-48f41f74941a@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16, where 1349d2790 was added
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit a3c7a993d fixed some cases involving target columns that are
arrays or composites by applying transformAssignedExpr to the VALUES
entries, and then stripping off any assignment ArrayRefs or
FieldStores that the transformation added. But I forgot about domains
over arrays or composites :-(. Such cases would either fail with
surprising complaints about mismatched datatypes, or insert unexpected
coercions that could lead to odd results. To fix, extend the
stripping logic to get rid of CoerceToDomain if it's atop an ArrayRef
or FieldStore.
While poking at this, I realized that there's a poorly documented and
not-at-all-tested behavior nearby: we coerce each VALUES column to
the domain type separately, and rely on the rewriter to merge those
operations so that the domain constraints are checked only once.
If that merging did not happen, it's entirely possible that we'd get
unexpected domain constraint failures due to checking a
partially-updated container value. There's no bug there, but while
we're here let's improve the commentary about it and add some test
cases that explicitly exercise that behavior.
Per bug #18393 from Pablo Kharo. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18393-65fedb1a0de9260d@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the synopsis, make the syntax for merge_update consistent with the
syntax for a plain UPDATE command. It was missing the optional "ROW"
keyword that can be used in a multi-column assignment, and the option
to assign from a multi-column subquery, both of which have been
supported by MERGE since it was introduced.
In the parameters section for the with_query parameter, mention that
WITH RECURSIVE isn't supported, since this is different from plain
INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE commands. While at it, move that entry to
the top of the list, for consistency with the other pages.
Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWoQyWkMFfu7JXXQr8dA6%3DgxjhYzgpuBP2oz0QoJTxGWw%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Starting with the Sonoma toolchain macos' linker emits warnings when the same
library is linked to twice. That's ill considered, as the same library can be
used by multiple subsidiary libraries. Luckily there's a flag to suppress that
warning.
On Ventura meson's default of -Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup caused warnings,
which we suppressed with -Wl,-undefined,error. Unfortunately that causes a
warning on Sonoma, which is absurd, as it's documented linker default. To
avoid that warning, only add -Wl,-undefined,error if it does not trigger
warnings. Luckily dynamic_lookup doesn't trigger a warning on Sonoma anymore.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231201040515.p5bshhhtfru7d3da@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 16-, where the meson build was added
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is a very ancient hack in check_sql_fn_retval that allows a
single SELECT targetlist entry of composite type to be taken as
supplying all the output columns of a function returning composite.
(This is grotty and fundamentally ambiguous, but it's really hard
to do nested composite-returning functions without it.)
As far as I know, that doesn't cause any problems in ordinary
functions. It's disastrous for procedures however. All procedures
that have any output parameters are labeled with prorettype RECORD,
and the CALL code expects it will get back a record with one column
per output parameter, regardless of whether any of those parameters
is composite. Doing something else leads to an assertion failure
or core dump.
This is simple enough to fix: we just need to not apply that rule
when considering procedures. However, that requires adding another
argument to check_sql_fn_retval, which at least in principle might be
getting called by external callers. Therefore, in the back branches
convert check_sql_fn_retval into an ABI-preserving wrapper around a
new function check_sql_fn_retval_ext.
Per report from Yahor Yuzefovich. This has been broken since we
implemented procedures, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABz5gWHSjj2df6uG0NRiDhZ_Uz=Y8t0FJP-_SVSsRsnrQT76Gg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 387da18874 moved the code to put socket into non-blocking mode
from socket_set_nonblocking() into the one-time initialization
function, pq_init(). In socket_set_nonblocking(), there indeed was a
risk of recursion on failure like the comment said, but in pq_init(),
ERROR or FATAL is fine. There's even another elog(FATAL) just after
this, if setting FD_CLOEXEC fails.
Note that COMMERROR merely logged the error, it did not close the
connection, so if putting the socket to non-blocking mode failed we
would use the connection anyway. You might not immediately notice,
because most socket operations in a regular backend wait for the
socket to become readable/writable anyway. But e.g. replication will
be quite broken.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d40a5cd0-2722-40c5-8755-12e9e811fa3c@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reported-by: doughale@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/170993253510.640.5664117187431542912@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's important for 'all_visible_according_to_vm' to correctly reflect
whether the VM bit is set or not, even when we are not trusting the VM
to skip pages, because contrary to what the comment said,
lazy_scan_prune() relies on it.
If it's incorrectly set to 'false', when the VM bit is in fact set,
lazy_scan_prune() will try to set the VM bit again and dirty the page
unnecessarily. As a result, if you used DISABLE_PAGE_SKIPPING, all
heap pages were dirtied, even if there were no changes. We would also
fail to clear any VM bits that were set incorrectly.
This was broken in commit 980ae17310, so backpatch to v16.
Backpatch-through: 16
Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman, Peter Geoghegan
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3df2b582-dc1c-46b6-99b6-38eddd1b2784@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For pass-by-reference types, the code added in 0b053e78b, which aimed to
resolve a memory leak, was overly aggressive in resetting the per-tuple
memory context which could result in pfree'd memory being accessed
resulting in failing to find previously cached results in the hash
table.
What was happening was prepare_probe_slot() was switching to the
per-tuple memory context and calling ExecEvalExpr(). ExecEvalExpr() may
have required a memory allocation. Both MemoizeHash_hash() and
MemoizeHash_equal() were aggressively resetting the per-tuple context
and after determining the hash value, the context would have gotten reset
before MemoizeHash_equal() was called. This could have resulted in
MemoizeHash_equal() looking at pfree'd memory.
This is less likely to have caused issues on a production build as some
other allocation would have had to have reused the pfree'd memory to
overwrite it. Otherwise, the original contents would have been intact.
However, this clearly caused issues on MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING builds.
Author: Tender Wang, Andrei Lepikhov
Reported-by: Tender Wang (using SQLancer)
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov, Richard Guo, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNnT6N6UJkya0z-jLFzVxcwGfeRQSfhiwA+NyLg-x8iGew@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14, where Memoize was added
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Backpatch changes from d57b7cc333, 75bcba6cbd to all supported branches per
proposal of Egor Chindyaskin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DE5FD776-A8CD-4378-BCFA-3BF30F1F6D60%40mail.ru
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For UNION ALL queries where a union child query contained a foreign
table, if the targetlist of that query contained a constant, and the
top-level query performed an ORDER BY which contained the column for the
constant value, then postgres_fdw would find the EquivalenceMember with
the Const and then try to produce an ORDER BY containing that Const.
This caused problems with INT typed Consts as these could appear to be
requests to order by an ordinal column position rather than the constant
value. This could lead to either an error such as:
ERROR: ORDER BY position <int const> is not in select list
or worse, if the constant value is a valid column, then we could just
sort by the wrong column altogether.
Here we fix this issue by just not including these Consts in the ORDER
BY clause.
In passing, add a new section for testing ORDER BY in the postgres_fdw
tests and move two existing tests which were misplaced in the WHERE
clause testing section into it.
Reported-by: Michał Kłeczek
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Richard Guo
Bug: #18381
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0714C8B8-8D82-4ABB-9F8D-A0C3657E7B6E%40kleczek.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18381-137456acd168bf93%40postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In OpenSSL 3.0.0 and later, ERR_reason_error_string randomly refuses
to provide a string for error codes representing system errno values
(e.g., "No such file or directory"). There is a poorly-documented way
to extract the errno from the SSL error code in this case, so do that
and apply strerror, rather than falling back to reporting the error
code's numeric value as we were previously doing.
Problem reported by David Zhang, although this is not his proposed
patch; it's instead based on a suggestion from Heikki Linnakangas.
Back-patch to all supported branches, since any of them are likely
to be used with recent OpenSSL.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b6fb018b-f05c-4afd-abd3-318c649faf18@highgo.ca
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When an UPDATE or DELETE action in MERGE returns TM_SelfModified,
there are 2 possible causes:
1). The target tuple was already updated or deleted by the current
command. This can happen if the target row joins to more than one
source row, and the SQL standard explicitly says that this must be
an error.
2). The target tuple was already updated or deleted by a later command
in the current transaction. This can happen if the tuple is
modified by a BEFORE trigger or a volatile function used in the
query, and should be an error for the same reason that it is in a
plain UPDATE or DELETE command.
In MERGE's primary error handling block, it failed to check for (2),
causing it to return a misleading error message in such cases.
In the secondary error handling block, following a concurrent update
from another session, it failed to check for (1), causing it to
silently ignore target rows joined to more than one source row,
instead of reporting an error.
Fix this, and add tests for both of these cases.
Per report from Wenjiang Zhang. Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was
introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tencent_41DE0FF443FE14B94A5898D373792109E408%40qq.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit eae7be600be7, following a discussion with Tom Lane,
due to concerns that this impacts the decisions made by the planner for
the number of workers spawned based on the inlining and const-folding of
index expressions and predicate for cases that would have worked until
this commit.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/162802.1709746091@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 12
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the corner case where a function returning RECORD has been
simplified to a RECORD constant or an inlined ROW() expression,
ExecInitFunctionScan failed to cross-check the function's result
rowtype against the coldeflist provided by the calling query.
That happened because get_expr_result_type is able to extract a
tupdesc from such expressions, which led ExecInitFunctionScan to
ignore the coldeflist. (Instead, it used the extracted tupdesc
to check the function's output, which of course always succeeds.)
I have not been able to demonstrate any really serious consequences
from this, because if some column of the result is of the wrong
type and is directly referenced by a Var of the calling query,
CheckVarSlotCompatibility will catch it. However, we definitely do
fail to report the case where the function returns more columns than
the coldeflist expects, and in the converse case where it returns
fewer columns, we get an assert failure (but, seemingly, no worse
results in non-assert builds).
To fix, always build the expected tupdesc from the coldeflist if there
is one, and consult get_expr_result_type only when there isn't one.
Also remove the failing Assert, even though it is no longer reached
after this fix. It doesn't seem to be adding anything useful, since
later checking will deal with cases with the wrong number of columns.
The only other place I could find that is doing something similar
is inline_set_returning_function. There's no live bug there because
we cannot be looking at a Const or RowExpr, but for consistency
change that code to agree with ExecInitFunctionScan.
Per report from PetSerAl. After some debate I've concluded that
this should be back-patched. There is a small risk that somebody
has been relying on such a case not throwing an error, but I judge
this outweighed by the risk that I've missed some way in which the
failure to cross-check has worse consequences than sketched above.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKygsHSerA1eXsJHR9wft3Gn3wfHQ5RfP8XHBzF70_qcrrRvEg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As coded, the planner logic that calculates the number of parallel
workers to use for a parallel index build uses expressions and
predicates from the relcache, which are flattened for the planner by
eval_const_expressions().
As reported in the bug, an immutable parallel-unsafe function flattened
in the relcache would become a Const, which would be considered as
parallel-safe, even if the predicate or the expressions including the
function are not safe in parallel workers. Depending on the expressions
or predicate used, this could cause the parallel build to fail.
Tests are included that check parallel index builds with parallel-unsafe
predicate and expressions. Two routines are added to lsyscache.h to be
able to retrieve expressions and predicate of an index from its pg_index
data.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Tender Wang
Reviewed-by: Jian He, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXN=UaAaNn9ruHDH3Os8kxLVmtWqbssnf=dZN_s9=evHUFA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 19d8e2308b changed when the HOT update optimization is possible
but neglected to update the Heap-Only Tuples (HOT) documentation. This
patch updates that documentation accordingly.
Author: Elizabeth Christensen
Backpatch-through: 16
Reviewed-By: Stephen Frost, Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABoUFXRjisr58Ct_3VsFEdQx+fJeQTWTdJnM7XAp=8MUbtoa9A@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The error message(s) were reporting the stats kind of 'f', which is not
correct as that's for the "dependencies" statistics kind.
Reported-by: Horst Reiterer
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18375-ba99383eb9062d6a@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12, where MCV extended stats were added.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The backend treats GUC names case-insensitively, so this code should
too. This avoids ending up with a confusing set of redundant entries
in the generated postgresql.conf file.
Per report from Kyotaro Horiguchi. Back-patch to v16 where this
feature was added (in commit 3e51b278d).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230928.164904.2153358973162534034.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The datatype for analyze_sampling had accidentally been set to text
and not string. Backpatch to v16 where analyze_sampling first was
introduced.
Author: Shinya Kato <Shinya11.Kato@oss.nttdata.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7fd9166b9fda267411793f39986d7f24@oss.nttdata.com
Backpatch-through: v16
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
dsa_dump would print a large negative number instead of zero for
segment bin 0. Fix by explicitly checking for underflow and add
special case for bin 0. Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Ian Ilyasov <ianilyasov@outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/GV1P251MB1004E0D09D117D3CECF9256ECD502@GV1P251MB1004.EURP251.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Backpatch-through: v12
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the case where the target timestamp is before the origin timestamp
and their difference is already an exact multiple of the stride, the
code incorrectly subtracted the stride anyway.
Also detect several integer-overflow cases that previously produced
bogus results. (The submitted patch tried to avoid overflow, but
I'm not convinced it's right, and problematic cases are so far out of
the plausibly-useful range that they don't seem worth sweating over.
Let's just use overflow-detecting arithmetic and throw errors.)
timestamp_bin() and timestamptz_bin() are basically identical and
so had identical bugs. Fix both.
Report and patch by Moaaz Assali, adjusted some by me. Back-patch
to v14 where date_bin() was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALkF+nvtuas-2kydG-WfofbRSJpyODAJWun==W-yO5j2R4meqA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a note about the additional privileges required after the fix in
4989ce72644b (wording per Tom Lane); also change marked-up mentions of
"target_table_name" to be simply "the target table" or the like. Also,
note that "join_condition" is scouted for requisite privileges.
Backpatch to 15.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202402211653.zuh6objy3z72@alvherre.pgsql
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit fixes the intermittent buildfarm failures in 031_column_list.
I missed to back-patch while committing b6df0798a5 in the HEAD.
Diagnosed-by: Amit Kapila
Author: Vignesh C
Backpatch-through: 15
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3307255.1706911634@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When this assertion was installed (in commit d2f60a3ab), I thought
it was only for catching server logic errors that caused accesses to
catalogs that were undergoing index rebuilds. However, it will also
fire in case of a user-defined index expression that attempts to
access its own table. We occasionally see reports of people trying
to do that, and typically getting unintelligible low-level errors
as a result. We can provide a more on-point message by making this
a regular runtime check.
While at it, adjust the similar error check in
systable_beginscan_ordered to use the same message text. That one
is (probably) not reachable without a coding bug, but we might as
well use a translatable message if we have one.
Per bug #18363 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18363-e3598a5a572d0699@postgresql.org
|
