aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* doc: Add note about possible performance overhead by enabling track_planning.Fujii Masao2020-07-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Enabling pg_stat_statements.track_plaanning may incur a noticeable performance penalty, especially when a fewer kinds of queries are executed on many concurrent connections. This commit documents this note. Back-patch to v13 where pg_stat_statements.track_plaanning was added. Suggested-by: Pavel Stehule Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRC9Jxa8r5i0TNBWLb8mzuaYzEoLq3QOvip0jVpHPOLbVA@mail.gmail.com
* Remove extra whitespace in comments atop ReorderBufferCheckMemoryLimit.Amit Kapila2020-07-06
| | | | Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced
* Remove unused function parameter in end_parallel_vacuum.Amit Kapila2020-07-06
| | | | | | | Author: Vignesh C Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm3Ppt71NafGY5mk3V2i3Q+mm93pVibDq-0NpW7WU67Jcg@mail.gmail.com
* doc: Spell checkingPeter Eisentraut2020-07-05
|
* doc: Fix incorrect reference to textout in plpgsql examplesMichael Paquier2020-07-05
| | | | | | | | | This error has survived for 22 years, and has been introduced by da63386. Reported-by: Erwin Brandstetter Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGHENJ57wogGOvGXo5LgWYcqswxafLck8ELqHDR+zrkTPgs_OQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Rename enable_incrementalsort for clarityPeter Eisentraut2020-07-05
| | | | | Author: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/df652910-e985-9547-152c-9d4357dc3979%402ndquadrant.com
* Fix "ignoring return value" complaints from commit 96d1f423f9Joe Conway2020-07-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The cfbot and some BF animals are complaining about the previous read_binary_file commit because of ignoring return value of ‘fread’. So let's make everyone happy by testing the return value even though not strictly needed. Reported by Justin Pryzby, and suggested patch by Tom Lane. Backpatched to v11 same as the previous commit. Reported-By: Justin Pryzby Reviewed-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/969b8d82-5bb2-5fa8-4eb1-f0e685c5d736%40joeconway.com Backpatch-through: 11
* Read until EOF vice stat-reported size in read_binary_fileJoe Conway2020-07-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | read_binary_file(), used by SQL functions pg_read_file() and friends, uses stat to determine file length to read, when not passed an explicit length as an argument. This is problematic, for example, if the file being read is a virtual file with a stat-reported length of zero. Arrange to read until EOF, or StringInfo data string lenth limit, is reached instead. Original complaint and patch by me, with significant review, corrections, advice, and code optimizations by Tom Lane. Backpatched to v11. Prior to that only paths relative to the data and log dirs were allowed for files, so no "zero length" files were reachable anyway. Reviewed-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/969b8d82-5bb2-5fa8-4eb1-f0e685c5d736%40joeconway.com Backpatch-through: 11
* Clamp total-tuples estimates for foreign tables to ensure planner sanity.Tom Lane2020-07-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | After running GetForeignRelSize for a foreign table, adjust rel->tuples to be at least as large as rel->rows. This prevents bizarre behavior in estimate_num_groups() and perhaps other places, especially in the scenario where rel->tuples is zero because pg_class.reltuples is (suggesting that ANALYZE has never been run for the table). As things stood, we'd end up estimating one group out of any GROUP BY on such a table, whereas the default group-count estimate is more likely to result in a sane plan. Also, clarify in the documentation that GetForeignRelSize has the option to override the rel->tuples value if it has a better idea of what to use than what is in pg_class.reltuples. Per report from Jeff Janes. Back-patch to all supported branches. Patch by me; thanks to Etsuro Fujita for review Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1xNo9cnan+Npxgz0eK7394xmjmKg-QEm8wYG9P5-CcaqQ@mail.gmail.com
* Fix temporary tablespaces for shared filesets some more.Tom Lane2020-07-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit ecd9e9f0b fixed the problem in the wrong place, causing unwanted side-effects on the behavior of GetNextTempTableSpace(). Instead, let's make SharedFileSetInit() responsible for subbing in the value of MyDatabaseTableSpace when the default tablespace is called for. The convention about what is in the tempTableSpaces[] array is evidently insufficiently documented, so try to improve that. It also looks like SharedFileSetInit() is doing the wrong thing in the case where temp_tablespaces is empty. It was hard-wiring use of the pg_default tablespace, but it seems like using MyDatabaseTableSpace is more consistent with what happens for other temp files. Back-patch the reversion of PrepareTempTablespaces()'s behavior to 9.5, as ecd9e9f0b was. The changes in SharedFileSetInit() go back to v11 where that was introduced. (Note there is net zero code change before v11 from these two patch sets, so nothing to release-note.) Magnus Hagander and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevExg5YEsOvqMxrjoNvb3ApVyH+9jggWGKwTDFyFCVWczGQ@mail.gmail.com
* Fix temporary tablespaces for shared filesetsMagnus Hagander2020-07-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | A likely copy/paste error in 98e8b480532 from back in 2004 would cause temp tablespace to be reset to InvalidOid if temp_tablespaces was set to the same value as the primary tablespace in the database. This would cause shared filesets (such as for parallel hash joins) to ignore them, putting the temporary files in the default tablespace instead of the configured one. The bug is in the old code, but it appears to have been exposed only once we had shared filesets. Reviewed-By: Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevExg5YEsOvqMxrjoNvb3ApVyH+9jggWGKwTDFyFCVWczGQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 9.5
* doc: Correct description of restart_lsn in pg_replication_slotsFujii Masao2020-07-03
| | | | | | | | | | | Previously the document explained that restart_lsn indicates the LSN of oldest WAL won't be automatically removed during checkpoints. But since v13 this was no longer true thanks to max_slot_wal_keep_size. Back-patch to v13 where max_slot_wal_keep_size was added. Author: Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6497f1e9-3148-c5da-7e49-b2fddad9a42f@oss.nttdata.com
* Change default of pg_stat_statements.track_planning to off.Fujii Masao2020-07-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since v13 pg_stat_statements is allowed to track the planning time of statements when track_planning option is enabled. Its default was on. But this feature could cause more terrible spinlock contentions in pg_stat_statements. As a result of this, Robins Tharakan reported that v13 beta1 showed ~45% performance drop at high DB connection counts (when compared with v12.3) during fully-cached SELECT-only test using pgbench. To avoid this performance regression by the default setting, this commit changes default of pg_stat_statements.track_planning to off. Back-patch to v13 where pg_stat_statements.track_planning was introduced. Reported-by: Robins Tharakan Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2895b53b033c47ccb22972b589050dd9@EX13D05UWC001.ant.amazon.com
* Improve vacuum error context handling.Amit Kapila2020-07-01
| | | | | | | | | | Use separate functions to save and restore error context information as that made code easier to understand.  Also, make it clear that the index information required for error context is sane. Author: Andres Freund, Justin Pryzby, Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LWo+v1OWu=Sky27GTGSCuOmr7iaURNbc5xz6jO+SaPeA@mail.gmail.com
* Fix removal of files generated by TAP tests for SSLMichael Paquier2020-07-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 001_ssltests.pl and 002_scram.pl both generated an extra file for a client key used in the tests that were not removed. In Debian, this causes repeated builds to fail. The code refactoring done in 4dc6355 broke the cleanup done in 001_ssltests.pl, and the new tests added in 002_scram.pl via d6e612f forgot the removal of one file. While on it, fix a second issue introduced in 002_scram.pl where we use the same file name in 001 and 002 for the temporary client key whose permissions are changed in the test, as using the same file name in both tests could cause failures with parallel jobs of src/test/ssl/ if one test removes a file still needed by the second test. Reported-by: Felix Lechner Author: Daniel Gustafsson, Felix Lechner Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFHYt543sjX=Cm_aEeoejStyP47C+Y3+Wh6WbirLXsgUMaw7iw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
* Further adjustments to Hashagg EXPLAIN ANALYZE outputDavid Rowley2020-07-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The "Disk Usage" and "HashAgg Batches" properties in the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for HashAgg were previously only shown if the number of batches was greater than 0. Here we change this so that these properties are always shown for EXPLAIN ANALYZE formats other than "text". The idea here is that since the HashAgg could have spilled to disk if there had been more data or groups to aggregate, then it's relevant that we're clear in the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output when no spilling occurred in this particular execution of the given plan. For the "text" EXPLAIN format, we still hide these properties when no spilling occurs. This EXPLAIN format is designed to be easy for humans to read. To maintain the readability we have a higher threshold for which properties we display for this format. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo_dmNozQQTmN-2jGp1vT%3Ddxx7Q0vd%2BMvD1cGpv2HU%3DSg%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13, where the hashagg spilling code was added.
* Fix ecpg crash with bytea and cursor variables.Michael Meskes2020-06-30
| | | | Author: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
* doc: clarify that storage parameter values are optionalBruce Momjian2020-06-30
| | | | | | | | | | | In a few cases, the documented syntax specified storage parameter values as required. Reported-by: galiev_mr@taximaxim.ru Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/159283163235.684.4482737698910467437@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 9.5
* doc: change pg_upgrade wal_level to be not minimalBruce Momjian2020-06-30
| | | | | | | | Previously it was specified to be only replica. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200618180058.GK7349@momjian.us Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Remove support for timezone "posixrules" file.Tom Lane2020-06-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The IANA tzcode library has a feature to read a time zone file named "posixrules" and apply the daylight-savings transition dates and times therein, when it is given a POSIX-style time zone specification that lacks an explicit transition rule. However, there's a problem with that code: it doesn't work for dates past the Y2038 time_t rollover. (Effectively, all times beyond that point are treated as standard time.) The IANA crew regard this feature as legacy, so their plan is to remove it not fix it. The time frame in which that will happen is unclear, but presumably it'll happen well before 2038. Moreover, effective with the next IANA data update (probably this fall), the recommended default will be to not install a "posixrules" file in the first place. The time frame in which tzdata packagers might adopt that suggestion is likewise unclear, but at least some platforms will probably do it in the next year or so. While we could ignore that recommendation so far as PG-supplied tzdata trees are concerned, builds using --with-system-tzdata will be subject to whatever the platform's tzdata packager decides to do. Thus, whether or not we do anything, some increasing fraction of Postgres users will be exposed to the behavior observed when there is no "posixrules" file; and if we do nothing, we'll have essentially no control over the timing of that change. The best thing to do to ameliorate the uncertainty seems to be to proactively remove the posixrules-reading feature. If we do that in a scheduled release then at least we can release-note the behavioral change, rather than having users be surprised by it after a routine tzdata update. The change in question is fairly minor anyway: to be affected, you have to be using a POSIX-style timezone spec, it has to not have an explicit rule, and it has to not be one of the four traditional continental-USA zone names (EST5EDT, CST6CDT, MST7MDT, or PST8PDT), as those are special-cased. Since the default "posixrules" file provides USA DST rules, the number of people who are likely to find such a zone spec useful is probably quite small. Moreover, the fallback behavior with no explicit rule and no "posixrules" file is to apply current USA rules, so the only thing that really breaks is the DST transitions in years before 2007 (and you get the countervailing fix that transitions after 2038 will be applied). Now, some installations might have replaced the "posixrules" file, allowing e.g. EU rules to be applied to a POSIX-style timezone spec. That won't work anymore. But it's not exactly clear why this solution would be preferable to using a regular named zone. In any case, given the Y2038 issue, we need to be pushing users to stop depending on this. Back-patch into v13; it hasn't been released yet, so it seems OK to change its behavior. (Personally I think we ought to back-patch further, but I've been outvoted.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1390.1562258309@sss.pgh.pa.us Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200621211855.6211-1-eggert@cs.ucla.edu
* Fix documentation of "must be vacuumed within" warning.Noah Misch2020-06-27
| | | | | | | | Warnings start 10M transactions before xidStopLimit, which is 11M transactions before wraparound. The sample WARNING output showed a value greater than 11M, and its HINT message predated commit 25ec228ef760eb91c094cc3b6dea7257cc22ffb5. Hence, the sample was impossible. Back-patch to 9.5 (all supported versions).
* Fix list of SSL error codes for older OpenSSL versions.Tom Lane2020-06-27
| | | | | Apparently 1.0.1 lacks SSL_R_VERSION_TOO_HIGH and SSL_R_VERSION_TOO_LOW. Per buildfarm.
* Add hints about protocol-version-related SSL connection failures.Tom Lane2020-06-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | OpenSSL's native reports about problems related to protocol version restrictions are pretty opaque and inconsistent. When we get an SSL error that is plausibly due to this, emit a hint message that includes the range of SSL protocol versions we (think we) are allowing. This should at least get the user thinking in the right direction to resolve the problem, even if the hint isn't totally accurate, which it might not be for assorted reasons. Back-patch to v13 where we increased the default minimum protocol version, thereby increasing the risk of this class of failure. Patch by me, reviewed by Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a9408304-4381-a5af-d259-e55d349ae4ce@2ndquadrant.com
* Change libpq's default ssl_min_protocol_version to TLSv1.2.Tom Lane2020-06-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When we initially created this parameter, in commit ff8ca5fad, we left the default as "allow any protocol version" on grounds of backwards compatibility. However, that's inconsistent with the backend's default since b1abfec82; protocol versions prior to 1.2 are not considered very secure; and OpenSSL has had TLSv1.2 support since 2012, so the number of PG servers that need a lesser minimum is probably quite small. On top of those things, it emerges that some popular distros (including Debian and RHEL) set MinProtocol=TLSv1.2 in openssl.cnf. Thus, far from having "allow any protocol version" behavior in practice, what we actually have as things stand is a platform-dependent lower limit. So, change our minds and set the min version to TLSv1.2. Anybody wanting to connect with a new libpq to a pre-2012 server can either set ssl_min_protocol_version=TLSv1 or accept the fallback to non-SSL. Back-patch to v13 where the aforementioned patches appeared. Patch by me, reviewed by Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a9408304-4381-a5af-d259-e55d349ae4ce@2ndquadrant.com
* Persist slot invalidation correctlyAlvaro Herrera2020-06-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We failed to save slot to disk after invalidating it, so the state was lost in case of server restart or crash. Fix by marking it dirty and flushing. Also, if the slot is known invalidated we don't need to reason about the LSN at all -- it's known invalidated. Only test the LSN if the slot is known not invalidated. Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17a69cfe-f1c1-a416-ee25-ae15427c69eb@oss.nttdata.com
* doc: PG 13 relnotes; remove FOREIGN keyword item and clarifyBruce Momjian2020-06-26
| | | | | | | | | | Clarify --include-foreign-data option addition. Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k62hYtce8VrEMGm6Y+1c24QBgCksXvOaH5kE8PbY+68sA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13 only
* Doc: explain that "timestamp - timestamp" applies justify_hours().Tom Lane2020-06-26
| | | | | | | Back-patch to v13; before that, there's not really space for this kind of detail. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c1696f68-fa8d-7759-6a9c-eb293ab1bbc9@gmx.net
* doc: mention trigger helper functions in CREATE TRIGGER docsBruce Momjian2020-06-25
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: petermpallesen@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/159195294959.673.5752624528747900508@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 9.5
* docs: clarify that CREATE DATABASE does not copy db permissionsBruce Momjian2020-06-25
| | | | | | | | | | That is, those database permissions set by GRANT. Diagnosed-by: Joseph Nahmias Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200614072613.GA21852@nahmias.net Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Fix misuse of table_index_fetch_tuple_check().Peter Geoghegan2020-06-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 0d861bbb, which added deduplication to nbtree, had _bt_check_unique() pass a TID to table_index_fetch_tuple_check() that isn't safe to mutate. table_index_fetch_tuple_check()'s tid argument is modified when the TID in question is not the latest visible tuple in a hot chain, though this wasn't documented. To fix, go back to using a local copy of the TID in _bt_check_unique(), and update comments above table_index_fetch_tuple_check(). Backpatch: 13-, where B-Tree deduplication was introduced.
* Doc: correct nitpicky mistakes in array_position/array_positions examples.Tom Lane2020-06-25
| | | | | | Daniel Gustafsson and Erik Rijkers, per report from nick@cleaton Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/159275646273.679.16940709892308114570@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Remove erroneous assertion from pg_copy_logical_replication_slot().Fujii Masao2020-06-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If restart_lsn of logical replication slot gets behind more than max_slot_wal_keep_size from the current LSN, the logical replication slot would be invalidated and its restart_lsn is reset to an invalid LSN. If this logical replication slot with an invalid restart_lsn was specified as the source slot in pg_copy_logical_replication_slot(), the function caused the assertion failure unexpectedly. This assertion was added because restart_lsn should not be invalid before. But in v13, it can be invalid thanks to max_slot_wal_keep_size. So since this assertion is no longer useful, this commit removes it. This commit also changes the errcode in the error message that pg_copy_logical_replication_slot() emits when the slot with an invalid restart_lsn is specified, to more appropriate one. Back-patch to v13 where max_slot_wal_keep_size was added and the assertion was no longer valid. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f91de4fb-a7ab-b90e-8132-74796e049d51@oss.nttdata.com
* Fix compiler warning induced by commit d8b15eeb8.Tom Lane2020-06-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | I forgot that INT64_FORMAT can't be used with sscanf on Windows. Use the same trick of sscanf'ing into a temp variable as we do in some other places in zic.c. The upstream IANA code avoids the portability problem by relying on <inttypes.h>'s SCNdFAST64 macro. Once we're requiring C99 in all branches, we should do likewise and drop this set of diffs from upstream. For now, though, a hack seems fine, since we do not actually care about leapseconds anyway. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4e5d1a5b-143e-e70e-a99d-a3b01c1ae7c3@2ndquadrant.com
* Adjust max_slot_wal_keep_size behavior per reviewAlvaro Herrera2020-06-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In pg_replication_slot, change output from normal/reserved/lost to reserved/extended/unreserved/ lost, which better expresses the possible states particularly near the time where segments are no longer safe but checkpoint has not run yet. Under the new definition, reserved means the slot is consuming WAL that's still under the normal WAL size constraints; extended means it's consuming WAL that's being protected by wal_keep_segments or the slot itself, whose size is below max_slot_wal_keep_size; unreserved means the WAL is no longer safe, but checkpoint has not yet removed those files. Such as slot is in imminent danger, but can still continue for a little while and may catch up to the reserved WAL space. Also, there were some bugs in the calculations used to report the status; fixed those. Backpatch to 13. Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200616.120236.1809496990963386593.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
* Save slot's restart_lsn when invalidated due to sizeAlvaro Herrera2020-06-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | We put it aside as invalidated_at, which let us show "lost" in pg_replication slot. Prior to this change, the state value was reported as NULL. Backpatch to 13. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200617.101707.1735599255100002667.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200407.120905.1507671100168805403.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
* Add parens to ConvertToXSegs macroAlvaro Herrera2020-06-24
| | | | | | | The current definition is dangerous. No bugs exist in our code at present, but backpatch to 11 nonetheless where it was introduced. Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
* Stamp 13beta2.REL_13_BETA2Tom Lane2020-06-22
|
* Doc fixup for hashagg_avoid_disk_plan GUC.Jeff Davis2020-06-22
| | | | | | Reported-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200620220402.GZ17995@telsasoft.com Backport-through: 13
* Undo double-quoting of index names in non-text EXPLAIN output formats.Tom Lane2020-06-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | explain_get_index_name() applied quote_identifier() to the index name. This is fine for text output, but the non-text output formats all have their own quoting conventions and would much rather start from the actual index name. For example in JSON you'd get something like "Index Name": "\"My Index\"", which is surely not desirable, especially when the same does not happen for table names. Hence, move the responsibility for applying quoting out to the callers, where it can go into already-existing special code paths for text format. This changes the API spec for users of explain_get_index_name_hook: before, they were supposed to apply quote_identifier() if necessary, now they should not. Research suggests that the only publicly available user of the hook is hypopg, and it actually forgot to apply quoting anyway, so it's fine. (In any case, there's no behavioral change for the output of a hook as seen in non-text EXPLAIN formats, so this won't break any case that programs should be relying on.) Digging in the commit logs, it appears that quoting was included in explain_get_index_name's duties when commit 604ffd280 invented it; and that was fine at the time because we only had text output format. This should have been rethought when non-text formats were invented, but it wasn't. This is a fairly clear bug for users of non-text EXPLAIN formats, so back-patch to all supported branches. Per bug #16502 from Maciek Sakrejda. Patch by me (based on investigation by Euler Taveira); thanks to Julien Rouhaud for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16502-57bd1c9f913ed1d1@postgresql.org
* Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut2020-06-22
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: https://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 434134899af310153f7511ccaa3f376e4c817e66
* Language fixes for docs related to opclass optionsAlexander Korotkov2020-06-21
| | | | | | Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200620232145.GB17995%40telsasoft.com Author: Justin Pryzby Backpatch-through: 13
* Doc: Tweak description of B-Tree duplicate tuples.Peter Geoghegan2020-06-20
| | | | | | | Defining duplicates as "close by" to each other was unclear. Simplify the definition. Backpatch: 13-, where deduplication was introduced (by commit 0d861bbb)
* Minor corrections to docs related to opclass optionsAlexander Korotkov2020-06-21
| | | | | Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzmwhYbxuoL0WjTLaiCxW3gj6qadeNpBhWAo_KZsE5-FGw%40mail.gmail.com
* Fix masking of SP-GiST pages during xlog consistency checkAlexander Korotkov2020-06-20
| | | | | | | | | | spg_mask() didn't take into account that pd_lower equal to SizeOfPageHeaderData is still valid value. This commit fixes that. Backpatch to 11, where spg_mask() pg_lower check was introduced. Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200615131405.GM52676%40paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 11
* Add documentation for opclass optionsAlexander Korotkov2020-06-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | 911e7020770 added opclass options and adjusted documentation for each particular affected opclass. However, documentation for extendability was not adjusted. This commit adjusts documentation for interfaces of index AMs and opclasses. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzmQnW6%2Bz5F9AW%2BSz%2BzEcEvXofTwh_A9J3%3D_WA-FBP0wYg%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan
* Ensure write failure reports no-disk-spaceAlvaro Herrera2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A few places calling fwrite and gzwrite were not setting errno to ENOSPC when reporting errors, as is customary; this led to some failures being reported as "could not write file: Success" which makes us look silly. Make a few of these places in pg_dump and pg_basebackup use our customary pattern. Backpatch-to: 9.5 Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200611153753.GU14879@telsasoft.com
* Future-proof regression tests against possibly-missing posixrules file.Tom Lane2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The IANA time zone folk have deprecated use of a "posixrules" file in the tz database. While for now it's our choice whether to keep supplying one in our own builds, installations built with --with-system-tzdata will soon be needing to cope with that file not being present, at least on some platforms. This causes a problem for the horology test, which expected the nonstandard POSIX zone spec "CST7CDT" to apply pre-2007 US daylight savings rules. That does happen if the posixrules file supplies such information, but otherwise the test produces undesired results. To fix, add an explicit transition date rule that matches 2005 practice. (We could alternatively have switched the test to use some real time zone, but it seems useful to have coverage of this type of zone spec.) While at it, update a documentation example that also relied on "CST7CDT"; use a real-world zone name instead. Also, document why the zone names EST5EDT, CST6CDT, MST7MDT, PST8PDT aren't subject to similar failures when "posixrules" is missing. Back-patch to all supported branches, since the hazard is the same for all. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1665379.1592581287@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Adjust some glossary termsAlvaro Herrera2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | Mostly in response to Jürgen Purtz critique of previous definitions, though I added many other changes. Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de> Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Reviewed-by: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c1e06008-2132-30f4-9b38-877e8683d418@purtz.de
* Fix deduplication "single value" strategy bug.Peter Geoghegan2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It was possible for deduplication's single value strategy to mistakenly believe that a very small duplicate tuple counts as one of the six large tuples that it aims to leave behind after the page finally splits. This could cause slightly suboptimal space utilization with very low cardinality indexes, though only under fairly narrow conditions. To fix, be particular about what kind of tuple counts as a maxpostingsize-capped tuple. This avoids confusion in the event of a small tuple that gets "wedged" between two large tuples, where all tuples on the page are duplicates of the same value. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=Y+sgSFc-O3LpiZX-POx2bC+okec2KafERHuzdVa7-rQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 13-, where deduplication was introduced (by commit 0d861bbb)
* Fix issues in invalidation of obsolete replication slots.Fujii Masao2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit fixes the following issues. 1. There is the case where the slot is dropped while trying to invalidate it. InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots() did not handle this case, and which could cause checkpoint to fail. 2. InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots() could emit the same log message multiple times unnecessary. It should be logged only once. 3. When marking the slot as used, we always searched the target slot from all the replication slots even if we already found it. This could cause useless waste of cycles. Back-patch to v13 where these issues were added as a part of max_slot_wal_keep_size code. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/66c05b67-3396-042c-1b41-bfa6c3ddcf82@oss.nttdata.com
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-08-04 11:31:55 +0000