| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, plpython was in the habit of allocating a lot of stuff in
TopMemoryContext, and it was very slipshod about making sure that stuff
got cleaned up; in particular, use of TopMemoryContext as fn_mcxt for
function calls represents an unfixable leak, since we generally don't
know what the called function might have allocated in fn_mcxt. This
results in session-lifespan leakage in certain usage scenarios, as for
example in a case reported by Ed Behn back in July.
To fix, get rid of all the retail allocations in TopMemoryContext.
All long-lived allocations are now made in sub-contexts that are
associated with specific objects (either pl/python procedures, or
Python-visible objects such as cursors and plans). We can clean these
up when the associated object is deleted.
I went so far as to get rid of PLy_malloc completely. There were a
couple of places where it could still have been used safely, but on
the whole it was just an invitation to bad coding.
Haribabu Kommi, based on a draft patch by Heikki Linnakangas;
some further work by me
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Up until now, the total amount of data that could be passed to a
background worker at startup was one datum, which can be a small as
4 bytes on some systems. That's enough to pass a dsm_handle or an
array index, but not much else. Add a bgw_extra flag to the
BackgroundWorker struct, allowing up to 128 bytes to be passed to
a new worker on any platform.
Use this to fix a problem I recently discovered with the parallel
context machinery added in 9.5: the master assigns each worker an
array index, and each worker subsequently assigns itself an array
index, and there's nothing to guarantee that the two sets of indexes
match, leading to chaos.
Normally, I would not back-patch the change to add bgw_extra, since it
is basically a feature addition. However, since 9.5 is still in beta
and there seems to be no other sensible way to repair the broken
parallel context machinery, back-patch to 9.5. Existing background
worker code can ignore the bgw_extra field without a problem, but
might need to be recompiled since the structure size has changed.
Report and patch by me. Review by Amit Kapila.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather than filling a temporary array and then copying values to the
output array, we can generate the required random permutation in-place
using the Fisher-Yates shuffle algorithm. This is shorter as well as
more efficient than before. It's pretty unlikely that anyone would
notice a speed improvement, but shorter code is better.
Nathan Wagner, edited a bit by me
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The preferred spelling was changed from FORCE QUOTE to FORCE_QUOTE and
the like, but some code was still referring to the old spellings.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather than relying on other extensions to be available for installation,
let's just add some test objects to the postgres_fdw extension itself
within the regression script.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The user can whitelist specified extension(s) in the foreign server's
options, whereupon we will treat immutable functions and operators of those
extensions as candidates to be sent for remote execution.
Whitelisting an extension in this way basically promises that the extension
exists on the remote server and behaves compatibly with the local instance.
We have no way to prove that formally, so we have to rely on the user to
get it right. But this seems like something that people can usually get
right in practice.
We might in future allow functions and operators to be whitelisted
individually, but extension granularity is a very convenient special case,
so it got done first.
The patch as-committed lacks any regression tests, which is unfortunate,
but introducing dependencies on other extensions for testing purposes
would break "make installcheck" scenarios, which is worse. I have some
ideas about klugy ways around that, but it seems like material for a
separate patch. For the moment, leave the problem open.
Paul Ramsey, hacked up a bit more by me
|
| |
|
|
| |
Peter Geoghegan
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the join problem's entire ORDER BY clause can be pushed to the
remote server, consider a path that adds this ORDER BY clause. If
use_remote_estimate is on, we cost this path using an additional
remote EXPLAIN. If not, we just estimate that the path costs 20%
more, which is intended to be large enough that we won't request a
remote sort when it's not helpful, but small enough that we'll have
the remote side do the sort when in doubt. In some cases, the remote
sort might actually be free, because the remote query plan might
happen to produce output that is ordered the way we need, but without
remote estimates we have no way of knowing that.
It might also be useful to request sorted output from the remote side
if it enables an efficient merge join, but this patch doesn't attempt
to handle that case.
Ashutosh Bapat with revisions by me. Also reviewed by Fabrízio de Royes
Mello and Jeevan Chalke.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Standard-conforming literals have been the default for long enough that
it no longer seems necessary to go out of our way to tell people to write
regex escapes illegibly.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix some brain fade in commit a2dabf0e1dda93c8: erroneous variable names
in docs, rearrangements that made sentences less clear not more so,
undocumented and poorly-chosen-anyway API behaviors of subroutines,
bad grammar in error messages, copy-and-paste faults.
Albe Laurenz and Tom Lane
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit a1480ec1d3bacb9acb08ec09f22bc25bc033115b purported to fix the
problems with commit b2ccb5f4e6c81305386edb34daf7d1d1e1ee112a, but it
didn't completely fix them. The problem is that the checks were
performed in the wrong order, leading to a race condition. If the
sender attached, sent a message, and detached after the receiver
called shm_mq_get_sender and before the receiver called
shm_mq_counterparty_gone, we'd incorrectly return SHM_MQ_DETACHED
before all messages were read. Repair by reversing the order of
operations, and add a long comment explaining why this new logic is
(hopefully) correct.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Peter Geoghegan
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit d1b7c1ffe72e86932b5395f29e006c3f503bc53d introduced a mechanism
for serializing a ParamListInfo structure to be passed to a parallel
worker. However, this mechanism failed to handle external expanded
values, as pointed out by Noah Misch. Repair.
Moreover, plpgsql_param_fetch requires adjustment because the
serialization mechanism needs it to skip evaluating unused parameters
just as we would do when it is called from copyParamList, but params
== estate->paramLI in that case. To fix, make the bms_is_member test
in that function unconditional.
Finally, have setup_param_list set a new ParamListInfo field,
paramMask, to the parameters actually used in the expression, so that
we don't try to fetch those that are not needed when serializing a
parameter list. This isn't necessary for correctness, but it makes
the performance of the parallel executor code comparable to what we
do for cases involving cursors.
Design suggestions and extensive review by Noah Misch. Patch by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Backpatch to 9.3, where it was initially omitted.
Craig Ringer, with minor adjustment by Kevin Grittner
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On insert the CheckForSerializableConflictIn() test was performed
before the page(s) which were going to be modified had been locked
(with an exclusive buffer content lock). If another process
acquired a relation SIReadLock on the heap and scanned to a page on
which an insert was going to occur before the page was so locked,
a rw-conflict would be missed, which could allow a serialization
anomaly to be missed. The window between the check and the page
lock was small, so the bug was generally not noticed unless there
was high concurrency with multiple processes inserting into the
same table.
This was reported by Peter Bailis as bug #11732, by Sean Chittenden
as bug #13667, and by others.
The race condition was eliminated in heap_insert() by moving the
check down below the acquisition of the buffer lock, which had been
the very next statement. Because of the loop locking and unlocking
multiple buffers in heap_multi_insert() a check was added after all
inserts were completed. The check before the start of the inserts
was left because it might avoid a large amount of work to detect a
serialization anomaly before performing the all of the inserts and
the related WAL logging.
While investigating this bug, other SSI bugs which were even harder
to hit in practice were noticed and fixed, an unnecessary check
(covered by another check, so redundant) was removed from
heap_update(), and comments were improved.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Kevin Grittner and Thomas Munro
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A lookbehind constraint is like a lookahead constraint in that it consumes
no text; but it checks for existence (or nonexistence) of a match *ending*
at the current point in the string, rather than one *starting* at the
current point. This is a long-requested feature since it exists in many
other regex libraries, but Henry Spencer had never got around to
implementing it in the code we use.
Just making it work is actually pretty trivial; but naive copying of the
logic for lookahead constraints leads to code that often spends O(N^2) time
to scan an N-character string, because we have to run the match engine
from string start to the current probe point each time the constraint is
checked. In typical use-cases a lookbehind constraint will be written at
the start of the regex and hence will need to be checked at every character
--- so O(N^2) work overall. To fix that, I introduced a third copy of the
core DFA matching loop, paralleling the existing longest() and shortest()
loops. This version, matchuntil(), can suspend and resume matching given
a couple of pointers' worth of storage space. So we need only run it
across the string once, stopping at each interesting probe point and then
resuming to advance to the next one.
I also put in an optimization that simplifies one-character lookahead and
lookbehind constraints, such as "(?=x)" or "(?<!\w)", into AHEAD and BEHIND
constraints, which already existed in the engine. This avoids the overhead
of the LACON machinery entirely for these rather common cases.
The net result is that lookbehind constraints run a factor of three or so
slower than Perl's for multi-character constraints, but faster than Perl's
for one-character constraints ... and they work fine for variable-length
constraints, which Perl gives up on entirely. So that's not bad from a
competitive perspective, and there's room for further optimization if
anyone cares. (In reality, raw scan rate across a large input string is
probably not that big a deal for Postgres usage anyway; so I'm happy if
it's linear.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Mistake introduced by commit 5bd91e3a835b5d5499fee5f49fc7c0c776fe63dd.
Hari Babu
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit b0b0d84b3d663a148022e900ebfc164284a95f55 purported to make it
possible to relaunch workers using the same parallel context, but it had
an unpleasant race condition: we might reinitialize after the workers
have sent their last control message but before they have dettached the
DSM, leaving to crashes. Repair by introducing a new ParallelContext
operation, ReinitializeParallelDSM.
Adjust execParallel.c to use this new support, so that we can rescan a
Gather node by relaunching workers but without needing to recreate the
DSM.
Amit Kapila, with some adjustments by me. Extracted from latest parallel
sequential scan patch.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Show how this can be used in practice to make queries simpler and more
flexible. Also, draw an explicit contrast to the existence operator,
which doesn't work that way.
Peter Geoghegan and Tom Lane
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Message style, plurals, quoting, spelling, consistency with similar
messages
|
| |
|
|
| |
Amit Langote, per Etsuro Fujita
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Mistake introduced by commit 3bf3ab8c563699138be02f9dc305b7b77a724307.
Etsuro Fujita
|
| |
|
|
| |
Per red wall in buildfarm
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original Gather code failed to mark a Gather node as not able to
do projection, but it couldn't, even though it did call initialize its
projection info via ExecAssignProjectionInfo. There doesn't seem to
be any good reason for this node not to have projection capability,
so clean things up so that it does. Without this, plans using Gather
nodes might need to carry extra Result nodes to do projection.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Backpatch to 9.5 -- this should have been part of b0b7be61337, but we
didn't have 38b03caebc5de either at the time.
Author: Emre Hasegeli
Revised by: Ian Barwick
Discussion:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAE2gYzyB39Q9up_-TO6FKhH44pcAM1x6n_Cuj15qKoLoFihUVg@mail.gmail.com
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/562DA711.3020305@2ndquadrant.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A bug in the original free space computation made it possible to
return a page which wasn't actually able to fit the item. Since the
insertion code isn't prepared to deal with PageAddItem failing, a PANIC
resulted ("failed to add BRIN tuple [to new page]"). Add a macro to
encapsulate the correct computation, and use it in
brin_getinsertbuffer's callers before calling that routine, to raise an
early error.
I became aware of the possiblity of a problem in this area while working
on ccc4c074994d734. There's no archived discussion about it, but it's
easy to reproduce a problem in the unpatched code with something like
CREATE TABLE t (a text);
CREATE INDEX ti ON t USING brin (a) WITH (pages_per_range=1);
for length in `seq 8000 8196`
do
psql -f - <<EOF
TRUNCATE TABLE t;
INSERT INTO t VALUES ('z'), (repeat('a', $length));
EOF
done
Backpatch to 9.5, where BRIN was introduced.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Further tweak commit_ts.c so that on a standby the state is completely
consistent with what that in the master, rather than behaving
differently in the cases that the settings differ. Now in standby and
master the module should always be active or inactive in lockstep.
Author: Petr Jelínek, with some further tweaks by Álvaro Herrera.
Backpatch to 9.5, where commit timestamps were introduced.
Discussion: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5622BF9D.2010409@2ndquadrant.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bernd Helmle complained that CreateReplicationSlot() was assigning the
same value to the same variable twice, so we could remove one of them.
Code inspection reveals that we can actually remove both assignments:
according to the author the assignment was there for beauty of the
strlen line only, and another possible fix to that is to put the strlen
in its own line, so do that.
To be consistent within the file, refactor all duplicated strlen()
calls, which is what we do elsewhere in the backend anyway. In
basebackup.c, snprintf already returns the right length; no need for
strlen afterwards.
Backpatch to 9.4, where replication slots were introduced, to keep code
identical. Some of this is older, but the patch doesn't apply cleanly
and it's only of cosmetic value anyway.
Discussion: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/BE2FD71DEA35A2287EA5F018@eje.credativ.lan
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
If the counterparty writes some data into the queue and then detaches,
it's wrong to return SHM_MQ_DETACHED right away. If we do that, we
fail to read whatever was written.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way, we produce a better error message if someone tries to do
something like ALTER INDEX .. ALTER COLUMN .. SET STORAGE.
Amit Langote
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The shm_mq mechanism was intended to optionally notice when the process
on the other end of the queue fails to attach to the queue. It does
this by allowing the user to pass a BackgroundWorkerHandle; if the
background worker in question is launched and dies without attaching
to the queue, then we know it never will. This logic works OK in
blocking mode, but when called with nowait = true we fail to notice
that this has happened due to an asymmetry in the logic. Repair.
Reported off-list by Rushabh Lathia. Patch by me.
|
| |
|
|
| |
CharSyam
|
| |
|
|
| |
with suggestion from Michael Paquier
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Once upon a time we did not have a separate CREATEROLE privilege, and
CREATEUSER effectively meant SUPERUSER. When we invented CREATEROLE
(in 8.1) we also added SUPERUSER so as to have a less confusing keyword
for this role property. However, we left CREATEUSER in place as a
deprecated synonym for SUPERUSER, because of backwards-compatibility
concerns. It's still there and is still confusing people, as for example
in bug #13694 from Justin Catterson. 9.6 will be ten years or so later,
which surely ought to be long enough to end the deprecation and just
remove these old keywords. Hence, do so.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 816e336f12ecabdc834d4cc31bcf966b2dd323dc added the wrong error
check to async.c; sending restrictions is restricted to the leader,
not altogether unsafe.
Commit 3bd909b220930f21d6e15833a17947be749e7fde added ExecShutdownNode
to traverse the planstate tree and call shutdown functions, but made
a Gather node, the only node that actually has such a function, abort
the tree traversal, which is wrong.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Patch by me, per a note from Simon Riggs. Reviewed by Amit Kapila
and Amit Langote.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit bda76c1c8cfb1d11751ba6be88f0242850481733 caused both plus and
minus infinity to be rendered as "infinity", which is not only wrong
but inconsistent with the pre-9.4 behavior of to_json(). Fix that by
duplicating the coding in date_out/timestamp_out/timestamptz_out more
closely. Per bug #13687 from Stepan Perlov. Back-patch to 9.4, like
the previous commit.
In passing, also re-pgindent json.c, since it had gotten a bit messed up by
recent patches (and I was already annoyed by indentation-related problems
in back-patching this fix ...)
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Etsuro Fujita
|
| |
|
|
| |
Amit Langote
|
| |
|
|
| |
Jeff Janes
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per a report from Shay Rojansky, Npgsql sends ssl_renegotiation_limit=0
in the startup packet because it does not support renegotiation; other
clients which have not attempted to support renegotiation might well
behave similarly. The recent removal of this parameter forces them to
break compatibility with either current PostgreSQL versions, or
previous ones. Per discussion, the best solution is to accept the
parameter but only allow a value of 0.
Shay Rojansky, edited a little by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 0e57b4d8bd9674adaf5747421b3255b85e385534 contained some clever
logic that attempted to make sure that we couldn't get confused about
whether the last thing we cached was a strcoll() result or a strxfrm()
result, but it wasn't quite clever enough, because we can perform
further abbreviations after having already performed some comparisons.
Introduce an explicit flag in the hopes of making this watertight.
Peter Geoghegan, reviewed by me.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Peter Geoghegan
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead, use transaction abort. Given an unlucky bout of latency, the
timeout would cancel the RESET itself. Buildfarm members gharial,
lapwing, mereswine, shearwater, and sungazer witness that. Back-patch
to 9.1 (all supported versions). The query_canceled test still could
timeout before entering its subtransaction; for whatever reason, that
has yet to happen on the buildfarm.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
pg_regprefix was doing nothing with lookahead constraints, which would
be fine if it were the right kind of nothing, but it isn't: we have to
terminate our search for a fixed prefix, not just pretend the LACON arc
isn't there. Otherwise, if the current state has both a LACON outarc and a
single plain-color outarc, we'd falsely conclude that the color represents
an addition to the fixed prefix, and generate an extracted index condition
that restricts the indexscan too much. (See added regression test case.)
Terminating the search is conservative: we could traverse the LACON arc
(thus assuming that the constraint can be satisfied at runtime) and then
examine the outarcs of the linked-to state. But that would be a lot more
work than it seems worth, because writing a LACON followed by a single
plain character is a pretty silly thing to do.
This makes a difference only in rather contrived cases, but it's a bug,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
|
