aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Catch stack overflow when recursing in transformFromClauseItem().Tom Lane2022-08-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Most parts of the parser can expect that the stack overflow check in transformExprRecurse() will trigger before things get desperate. However, transformFromClauseItem() can recurse directly to self without having analyzed any expressions, so it's possible to drive it to a stack-overrun crash. Add a check to prevent that. Per bug #17583 from Egor Chindyaskin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Richard Guo Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17583-33be55b9f981f75c@postgresql.org
* Add missing fields to _outConstraint()Peter Eisentraut2022-08-13
| | | | | | | | As of 897795240cfaaed724af2f53ed2c50c9862f951f, check constraints can be declared invalid. But that patch didn't update _outConstraint() to also show the relevant struct fields (which were only applicable to foreign keys before that). This currently only affects debugging output, so no impact in practice.
* pg_upgrade: Fix some minor code issuesPeter Eisentraut2022-08-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | 96ef3b8ff1cf1950e897fd2f766d4bd9ef0d5d56 accidentally copied a not applicable comment from the float8_pass_by_value code to the data_checksums code. Remove that. 87d3b35a1ca31a9d947a8f919a6006679216dff0 changed pg_upgrade to checking the checksum version rather than just the Boolean presence of checksums, but didn't change the field type in its ControlData struct from bool. So this would not work correctly if there ever is a checksum version larger than 1.
* doc: add missing role attributes to user management sectionBruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | Reported-by: Shinya Kato Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1ecdb1ff78e9b03dfce37e85eaca725a@oss.nttdata.com Author: Shinya Kato Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: add section about heap-only tuples (HOT)Bruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: Jonathan S. Katz Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c59ffbd5-96ac-a5a5-a401-14f627ca1405@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 11
* doc: warn about security issues around log filesBruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | Reported-by: Simon Riggs Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANP8+jJESuuXYq9Djvf-+tx2vY2OFLmfEuu+UvwHNJ1RT7iJCQ@mail.gmail.com Author: Simon Riggs Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: clarify configuration file for Windows buildsBruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | The use of file 'config.pl' was not clearly explained. Reported-by: liambowen@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/164246013804.31952.4958087335645367498@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: document the CREATE INDEX "USING" clauseBruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | Somehow this was in the syntax but had no description. Reported-by: robertcorrington@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/164228771825.31954.2719791849363756957@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: clarify CREATE TABLE AS ... IF NOT EXISTSBruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | Mention that the table is not modified if it already exists. Reported-by: frank_limpert@yahoo.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/164441177106.9677.5991676148704507229@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 10
* Fix _outConstraint() for "identity" constraintsPeter Eisentraut2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | The set of fields printed by _outConstraint() in the CONSTR_IDENTITY case didn't match the set of fields actually used in that case. (The code was probably uncarefully copied from the CONSTR_DEFAULT case.) Fix that by using the right set of fields. Since there is no read support for this node type, this is really just for debugging output right now, so it doesn't affect anything important.
* Back-Patch "Add wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests."Amit Kapila2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This was originally done in commit 0c20dd33db for 16 only, to eliminate duplicate code and as an infrastructure that makes it easier to write future tests. However, it has been suggested that it would be good to back-patch this testing infrastructure to aid future tests in back-branches. Backpatch to all supported versions. Author: Masahiko Sawada Reviewed by: Amit Kapila, Shi yu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoC-fvAkaKHa4t1urupwL8xbAcWRePeETvshvy80f6WV1A@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1oJBIf-0006sw-SA@gemulon.postgresql.org
* Fix catalog lookup with the wrong snapshot during logical decoding.Amit Kapila2022-08-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, we relied on HEAP2_NEW_CID records and XACT_INVALIDATION records to know if the transaction has modified the catalog, and that information is not serialized to snapshot. Therefore, after the restart, if the logical decoding decodes only the commit record of the transaction that has actually modified a catalog, we will miss adding its XID to the snapshot. Thus, we will end up looking at catalogs with the wrong snapshot. To fix this problem, this changes the snapshot builder so that it remembers the last-running-xacts list of the decoded RUNNING_XACTS record after restoring the previously serialized snapshot. Then, we mark the transaction as containing catalog changes if it's in the list of initial running transactions and its commit record has XACT_XINFO_HAS_INVALS. To avoid ABI breakage, we store the array of the initial running transactions in the static variables InitialRunningXacts and NInitialRunningXacts, instead of storing those in SnapBuild or ReorderBuffer. This approach has a false positive; we could end up adding the transaction that didn't change catalog to the snapshot since we cannot distinguish whether the transaction has catalog changes only by checking the COMMIT record. It doesn't have the information on which (sub) transaction has catalog changes, and XACT_XINFO_HAS_INVALS doesn't necessarily indicate that the transaction has catalog change. But that won't be a problem since we use snapshot built during decoding only to read system catalogs. On the master branch, we took a more future-proof approach by writing catalog modifying transactions to the serialized snapshot which avoids the above false positive. But we cannot backpatch it because of a change in the SnapBuild. Reported-by: Mike Oh Author: Masahiko Sawada Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Shi yu, Takamichi Osumi, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Bertrand Drouvot, Ahsan Hadi Backpatch-through: 10 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/81D0D8B0-E7C4-4999-B616-1E5004DBDCD2%40amazon.com
* Fix handling of R/W expanded datums that are passed to SQL functions.Tom Lane2022-08-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | fmgr_sql must make expanded-datum arguments read-only, because it's possible that the function body will pass the argument to more than one callee function. If one of those functions takes the datum's R/W property as license to scribble on it, then later callees will see an unexpected value, leading to wrong answers. From a performance standpoint, it'd be nice to skip this in the common case that the argument value is passed to only one callee. However, detecting that seems fairly hard, and certainly not something that I care to attempt in a back-patched bug fix. Per report from Adam Mackler. This has been broken since we invented expanded datums, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/WScDU5qfoZ7PB2gXwNqwGGgDPmWzz08VdydcPFLhOwUKZcdWbblbo-0Lku-qhuEiZoXJ82jpiQU4hOjOcrevYEDeoAvz6nR0IU4IHhXnaCA=@mackler.email Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/187436.1660143060@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Stamp 12.12.REL_12_12Tom Lane2022-08-08
|
* Stabilize output of new regression test.Tom Lane2022-08-08
| | | | | | | | | | Per buildfarm, the output order of \dx+ isn't consistent across locales. Apply NO_LOCALE to force C locale. There might be a more localized way, but I'm not seeing it offhand, and anyway there is nothing in this test module that particularly cares about locales. Security: CVE-2022-2625
* Last-minute updates for release notes.Tom Lane2022-08-08
| | | | Security: CVE-2022-2625
* In extensions, don't replace objects not belonging to the extension.Tom Lane2022-08-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, if an extension script did CREATE OR REPLACE and there was an existing object not belonging to the extension, it would overwrite the object and adopt it into the extension. This is problematic, first because the overwrite is probably unintentional, and second because we didn't change the object's ownership. Thus a hostile user could create an object in advance of an expected CREATE EXTENSION command, and would then have ownership rights on an extension object, which could be modified for trojan-horse-type attacks. Hence, forbid CREATE OR REPLACE of an existing object unless it already belongs to the extension. (Note that we've always forbidden replacing an object that belongs to some other extension; only the behavior for previously-free-standing objects changes here.) For the same reason, also fail CREATE IF NOT EXISTS when there is an existing object that doesn't belong to the extension. Our thanks to Sven Klemm for reporting this problem. Security: CVE-2022-2625
* Translation updatesAlvaro Herrera2022-08-08
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: ssh://git@git.postgresql.org/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: efdf4e068bcb504ef277413196f978621726bda5
* Release notes for 14.5, 13.8, 12.12, 11.17, 10.22.Tom Lane2022-08-07
|
* Remove unportable use of timezone in recent testAlvaro Herrera2022-08-07
| | | | | | Per buildfarm member snapper Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/129951.1659812518@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Improve recently-added test reliabilityAlvaro Herrera2022-08-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 59be1c942a47 already tried to make src/test/recovery/t/033_replay_tsp_drops more reliable, but it wasn't enough. Try to improve on that by making this use of a replication slot to be more like others. Also, don't drop the slot. Make a few other stylistic changes while at it. It's still quite slow, which is another thing that we need to fix in this script. Backpatch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/349302.1659191875@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Backpatch addition of .git-blame-ignore-revsAlvaro Herrera2022-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This makes it more convenient for git config to contain the blame.ignoreRevsFile setting; otherwise current git versions complain if the file is not present. I constructed the file for each branch by scraping the file in branch master for commits that appear in that branch. Because a few additional pgindent commits have been added to the list in master since the list was first created, this also propagates those to branches 14 and 15 where the file already existed. Also, some entries appear to have been made using author-date rather than committer-date in the format string, so some timestamps are changed. Also remove bogus whitespace in the suggested `git log` format string. Backpatch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220711163138.o72evdeus5f5yy5z@alvherre.pgsql
* BRIN: mask BRIN_EVACUATE_PAGE for WAL consistency checkingAlvaro Herrera2022-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | That bit is unlogged and therefore it's wrong to consider it in WAL page comparison. Add a test that tickles the case, as branch testing technology allows. This has been a problem ever since wal consistency checking was introduced (commit a507b86900f6 for pg10), so backpatch to all supported branches. Author: 王海洋 (Haiyang Wang) <wanghaiyang.001@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACciXAD2UvLMOhc4jX9VvOKt7DtYLr3OYRBhvOZ-jRxtzc_7Jg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACciXADOfErX9Bx0nzE_SkdfXr6Bbpo5R=v_B6MUTEYW4ya+cg@mail.gmail.com
* Add HINT for restartpoint race with KeepFileRestoredFromArchive().Noah Misch2022-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | The five commits ending at cc2c7d65fc27e877c9f407587b0b92d46cd6dd16 closed this race condition for v15+. For v14 through v10, add a HINT to discourage studying the cosmetic problem. Reviewed by Kyotaro Horiguchi and David Steele. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220731061747.GA3692882@rfd.leadboat.com
* regress: fix test instabilityAlvaro Herrera2022-08-05
| | | | | | | Having additional triggers in a test table made the ORDER BY clauses in old queries underspecified. Add another column there for stability. Per sporadic buildfarm pink.
* Fix ENABLE/DISABLE TRIGGER to handle recursion correctlyAlvaro Herrera2022-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Using ATSimpleRecursion() in ATPrepCmd() to do so as bbb927b4db9b did is not correct, because ATPrepCmd() can't distinguish between triggers that may be cloned and those that may not, so would wrongly try to recurse for the latter category of triggers. So this commit restores the code in EnableDisableTrigger() that 86f575948c77 had added to do the recursion, which would do it only for triggers that may be cloned, that is, row-level triggers. This also changes tablecmds.c such that ATExecCmd() is able to pass the value of ONLY flag down to EnableDisableTrigger() using its new 'recurse' parameter. This also fixes what seems like an oversight of 86f575948c77 that the recursion to partition triggers would only occur if EnableDisableTrigger() had actually changed the trigger. It is more apt to recurse to inspect partition triggers even if the parent's trigger didn't need to be changed: only then can we be certain that all descendants share the same state afterwards. Backpatch all the way back to 11, like bbb927b4db9b. Care is taken not to break ABI compatibility (and that no catversion bump is needed.) Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqG-cZT3XzGAnEgZQLoQbyfJApVwOTQaCaas1mhpf+4V5A@mail.gmail.com
* Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in ExecInsert's speculative insertion loop.Tom Lane2022-08-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Ordinarily the functions called in this loop ought to have plenty of CFIs themselves; but we've now seen a case where no such CFI is reached, making the loop uninterruptible. Even though that's from a recently-introduced bug, it seems prudent to install a CFI at the loop level in all branches. Per discussion of bug #17558 from Andrew Kesper (an actual fix for that bug will follow). Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17558-3f6599ffcf52fd4a@postgresql.org
* Reduce test runtime of src/test/modules/snapshot_too_old.Tom Lane2022-08-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The sto_using_cursor and sto_using_select tests were coded to exercise every permutation of their test steps, but AFAICS there is no value in exercising more than one. This matters because each permutation costs about six seconds, thanks to the "pg_sleep(6)". Perhaps we could reduce that, but the useless permutations seem worth getting rid of in any case. (Note that sto_using_hash_index got it right already.) While here, clean up some other sloppiness such as an unused table. This doesn't make too much difference in interactive testing, since the wasted time is typically masked by parallelization with other tests. However, the buildfarm runs this as a serial step, which means we can expect to shave ~40 seconds from every buildfarm run. That makes it worth back-patching. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2515192.1659454702@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Be more wary about 32-bit integer overflow in pg_stat_statements.Tom Lane2022-08-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We've heard a couple of reports of people having trouble with multi-gigabyte-sized query-texts files. It occurred to me that on 32-bit platforms, there could be an issue with integer overflow of calculations associated with the total query text size. Address that with several changes: 1. Limit pg_stat_statements.max to INT_MAX / 2 not INT_MAX. The hashtable code will bound it to that anyway unless "long" is 64 bits. We still need overflow guards on its use, but this helps. 2. Add a check to prevent extending the query-texts file to more than MaxAllocHugeSize. If it got that big, qtext_load_file would certainly fail, so there's not much point in allowing it. Without this, we'd need to consider whether extent, query_offset, and related variables shouldn't be off_t not size_t. 3. Adjust the comparisons in need_gc_qtexts() to be done in 64-bit arithmetic on all platforms. It appears possible that under duress those multiplications could overflow 32 bits, yielding a false conclusion that we need to garbage-collect the texts file, which could lead to repeatedly garbage-collecting after every hash table insertion. Per report from Bruno da Silva. I'm not convinced that these issues fully explain his problem; there may be some other bug that's contributing to the query-texts file becoming so large in the first place. But it did get that big, so #2 is a reasonable defense, and #3 could explain the reported performance difficulties. (See also commit 8bbe4cbd9, which addressed some related bugs. The second Discussion: link is the thread that led up to that.) This issue is old, and is primarily a problem for old platforms, so back-patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB+Nuk93fL1Q9eLOCotvLP07g7RAv4vbdrkm0cVQohDVMpAb9A@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5601D354.5000703@BlueTreble.com
* Check maximum number of columns in function RTEs, too.Tom Lane2022-08-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I thought commit fd96d14d9 had plugged all the holes of this sort, but no, function RTEs could produce oversize tuples too, either via long coldeflists or just from multiple functions in one RTE. (I'm pretty sure the other variants of base RTEs aren't a problem, because they ultimately refer to either a table or a sub-SELECT, whose widths are enforced elsewhere. But we explicitly allow join RTEs to be overwidth, as long as you don't try to form their tuple result.) Per further discussion of bug #17561. As before, patch all branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17561-80350151b9ad2ad4@postgresql.org
* Fix error reporting after ioctl() call with pg_upgrade --cloneMichael Paquier2022-08-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | errno was not reported correctly after attempting to clone a file, leading to incorrect error reports. While scanning through the code, I have not noticed any similar mistakes. Error introduced in 3a769d8. Author: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220731134135.GY15006@telsasoft.com Backpatch-through: 12
* Fix new recovery test for log_error_verbosity=verbose caseAndrew Dunstan2022-07-29
| | | | | | | | | The new test is from commit 9e4f914b5e. With this setting messages have SQL error numbers included, so that needs to be provided for in the pattern looked for. Backpatch to all live branches like the original.
* In transformRowExpr(), check for too many columns in the row.Tom Lane2022-07-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A RowExpr with more than MaxTupleAttributeNumber columns would fail at execution anyway, since we cannot form a tuple datum with more than that many columns. While heap_form_tuple() has a check for too many columns, it emerges that there are some intermediate bits of code that don't check and can be driven to failure with sufficiently many columns. Checking this at parse time seems like the most appropriate place to install a defense, since we already check SELECT list length there. While at it, make the SELECT-list-length error use the same errcode (TOO_MANY_COLUMNS) as heap_form_tuple does, rather than the generic PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED. Per bug #17561 from Egor Chindyaskin. The given test case crashes in all supported branches (and probably a lot further back), so patch all. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17561-80350151b9ad2ad4@postgresql.org
* Fix test instabilityAlvaro Herrera2022-07-29
| | | | | | | | | | On FreeBSD, the new test fails due to a WAL file being removed before the standby has had the chance to copy it. Fix by adding a replication slot to prevent the removal until after the standby has connected. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Reported-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2Wj5nau_qpjbwihvmXLfkAWOZ5TKdbnqOc6nKSiRJEoPyQ@mail.gmail.com
* Fix replay of create database records on standbyAlvaro Herrera2022-07-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Crash recovery on standby may encounter missing directories when replaying database-creation WAL records. Prior to this patch, the standby would fail to recover in such a case; however, the directories could be legitimately missing. Consider the following sequence of commands: CREATE DATABASE DROP DATABASE DROP TABLESPACE If, after replaying the last WAL record and removing the tablespace directory, the standby crashes and has to replay the create database record again, crash recovery must be able to continue. A fix for this problem was already attempted in 49d9cfc68bf4, but it was reverted because of design issues. This new version is based on Robert Haas' proposal: any missing tablespaces are created during recovery before reaching consistency. Tablespaces are created as real directories, and should be deleted by later replay. CheckRecoveryConsistency ensures they have disappeared. The problems detected by this new code are reported as PANIC, except when allow_in_place_tablespaces is set to ON, in which case they are WARNING. Apart from making tests possible, this gives users an escape hatch in case things don't go as planned. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Author: Asim R Praveen <apraveen@pivotal.io> Author: Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com> (older versions) Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> (older versions) Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Diagnosed-by: Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEET0ZGx9AvioViLf7nbR_8tH9-=27DN5xWJ2P9-ROH16e4JUA@mail.gmail.com
* Allow "in place" tablespaces.Alvaro Herrera2022-07-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a backpatch to branches 10-14 of the following commits: 7170f2159fb2 Allow "in place" tablespaces. c6f2f01611d4 Fix pg_basebackup with in-place tablespaces. f6f0db4d6240 Fix pg_tablespace_location() with in-place tablespaces 7a7cd84893e0 doc: Remove mention to in-place tablespaces for pg_tablespace_location() 5344723755bd Remove unnecessary Windows-specific basebackup code. In-place tablespaces were introduced as a testing helper mechanism, but they are going to be used for a bugfix in WAL replay to be backpatched to all stable branches. I (Álvaro) had to adjust some code to account for lack of get_dirent_type() in branches prior to 14. Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Author: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220722081858.omhn2in5zt3g4nek@alvherre.pgsql
* Force immediate commit after CREATE DATABASE etc in extended protocol.Tom Lane2022-07-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We have a few commands that "can't run in a transaction block", meaning that if they complete their processing but then we fail to COMMIT, we'll be left with inconsistent on-disk state. However, the existing defenses for this are only watertight for simple query protocol. In extended protocol, we didn't commit until receiving a Sync message. Since the client is allowed to issue another command instead of Sync, we're in trouble if that command fails or is an explicit ROLLBACK. In any case, sitting in an inconsistent state while waiting for a client message that might not come seems pretty risky. This case wasn't reachable via libpq before we introduced pipeline mode, but it's always been an intended aspect of extended query protocol, and likely there are other clients that could reach it before. To fix, set a flag in PreventInTransactionBlock that tells exec_execute_message to force an immediate commit. This seems to be the approach that does least damage to existing working cases while still preventing the undesirable outcomes. While here, add some documentation to protocol.sgml that explicitly says how to use pipelining. That's latent in the existing docs if you know what to look for, but it's better to spell it out; and it provides a place to document this new behavior. Per bug #17434 from Yugo Nagata. It's been wrong for ages, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17434-d9f7a064ce2a88a3@postgresql.org
* Doc: improve documentation about random().Tom Lane2022-07-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We didn't explicitly say that random() uses a randomly-chosen seed if you haven't called setseed(). Do so. Also, remove ref/set.sgml's no-longer-accurate (and never very relevant) statement that the seed value is multiplied by 2^31-1. Back-patch to v12 where set.sgml's claim stopped being true. The claim that we use a source of random bits as seed was debatable before 4203842a1, too, so v12 seems like a good place to stop. Per question from Carl Sopchak. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f37bb937-9d99-08f0-4de7-80c91a3cfc2e@sopchak.me
* doc: use wording "restore" instead of "reload" of dumpsBruce Momjian2022-07-21
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: axel.kluener@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/164736074430.660.3645615289283943146@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 11
* doc: clarify that auth. names are lower case and case-sensitiveBruce Momjian2022-07-21
| | | | | | | | | | This is true even for acronyms that are usually upper case, like LDAP. Reported-by: Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202205141521.2nodjabmsour@alvherre.pgsql Backpatch-through: 10
* Fix ruleutils issues with dropped cols in functions-returning-composite.Tom Lane2022-07-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Due to lack of concern for the case in the dependency code, it's possible to drop a column of a composite type even though stored queries have references to the dropped column via functions-in-FROM that return the composite type. There are "soft" references, namely FROM-clause aliases for such columns, and "hard" references, that is actual Vars referring to them. The right fix for hard references is to add dependencies preventing the drop; something we've known for many years and not done (and this commit still doesn't address it). A "soft" reference shouldn't prevent a drop though. We've been around on this before (cf. 9b35ddce9, 2c4debbd0), but nobody had noticed that the current behavior can result in dump/reload failures, because ruleutils.c can print more column aliases than the underlying composite type now has. So we need to rejigger the column-alias-handling code to treat such columns as dropped and not print aliases for them. Rather than writing new code for this, I used expandRTE() which already knows how to figure out which function result columns are dropped. I'd initially thought maybe we could use expandRTE() in all cases, but that fails for EXPLAIN's purposes, because the planner strips a lot of RTE infrastructure that expandRTE() needs. So this patch just uses it for unplanned function RTEs and otherwise does things the old way. If there is a hard reference (Var), then removing the column alias causes us to fail to print the Var, since there's no longer a name to print. Failing seems less desirable than printing a made-up name, so I made it print "?dropped?column?" instead. Per report from Timo Stolz. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5c91267e-3b6d-5795-189c-d15a55d61dbb@nullachtvierzehn.de
* Fix assertion failure and segmentation fault in backup code.Fujii Masao2022-07-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a non-exclusive backup is canceled, do_pg_abort_backup() is called and resets some variables set by pg_backup_start (pg_start_backup in v14 or before). But previously it forgot to reset the session state indicating whether a non-exclusive backup is in progress or not in this session. This issue could cause an assertion failure when the session running BASE_BACKUP is terminated after it executed pg_backup_start and pg_backup_stop (pg_stop_backup in v14 or before). Also it could cause a segmentation fault when pg_backup_stop is called after BASE_BACKUP in the same session is canceled. This commit fixes the issue by making do_pg_abort_backup reset that session state. Back-patch to all supported branches. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Masahiko Sawada, Michael Paquier, Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3374718f-9fbf-a950-6d66-d973e027f44c@oss.nttdata.com
* Prevent BASE_BACKUP in the middle of another backup in the same session.Fujii Masao2022-07-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Multiple non-exclusive backups are able to be run conrrently in different sessions. But, in the same session, only one non-exclusive backup can be run at the same moment. If pg_backup_start (pg_start_backup in v14 or before) is called in the middle of another non-exclusive backup in the same session, an error is thrown. However, previously, in logical replication walsender mode, even if that walsender session had already called pg_backup_start and started a non-exclusive backup, it could execute BASE_BACKUP command and start another non-exclusive backup. Which caused subsequent pg_backup_stop to throw an error because BASE_BACKUP unexpectedly reset the session state marked by pg_backup_start. This commit prevents BASE_BACKUP command in the middle of another non-exclusive backup in the same session. Back-patch to all supported branches. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Masahiko Sawada, Michael Paquier, Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3374718f-9fbf-a950-6d66-d973e027f44c@oss.nttdata.com
* Re-add SPICleanup for ABI compatibility in stable branchPeter Eisentraut2022-07-18
| | | | | | | | This fixes an ABI break introduced by 293f5c5f496cd8ce87c65b393613da675fc0bb8d. Author: Markus Wanner <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/defd749a-8410-841d-1126-21398686d63d@enterprisedb.com
* postgres_fdw: set search_path to 'pg_catalog' while deparsing constants.Tom Lane2022-07-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The motivation for this is to ensure successful transmission of the values of constants of regconfig and other reg* types. The remote will be reading them with search_path = 'pg_catalog', so schema qualification is necessary when referencing objects in other schemas. Per bug #17483 from Emmanuel Quincerot. Back-patch to all supported versions. (There's some other stuff to do here, but it's less back-patchable.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1423433.1652722406@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Make dsm_impl_posix_resize more future-proof.Thomas Munro2022-07-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 4518c798 blocks signals for a short region of code, but it assumed that whatever called it had the signal mask set to UnBlockSig on entry. That may be true today (or may even not be, in extensions in the wild), but it would be better not to make that assumption. We should save-and-restore the caller's signal mask. The PG_SETMASK() portability macro couldn't be used for that, which is why it wasn't done before. But... considering that commit a65e0864 established back in 9.6 that supported POSIX systems have sigprocmask(), and that this is POSIX-only code, there is no reason not to use standard sigprocmask() directly to achieve that. Back-patch to all supported releases, like 4518c798 and 80845b7c. Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKx6Biq7_UuV0kn9DW%2B8QWcpJC1qwhizdtD9tN-fn0H0g%40mail.gmail.com
* pg_upgrade doc: mention that replication slots must be recreatedBruce Momjian2022-07-14
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: Nikhil Shetty Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFpL5Vxastip0Jei-K-=7cKXTg=5sahSe5g=om=x68NOX8+PUA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: add documentation about ecpg Oracle-compatibility modeBruce Momjian2022-07-14
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: Takeshi Ideriha Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYCPR01MB7041A157067208327D8DAAF9EAA59@TYCPR01MB7041.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com Backpatch-through: 11
* doc: clarify the behavior of identically-named savepointsBruce Momjian2022-07-14
| | | | | | | | | | Original patch by David G. Johnston. Reported-by: David G. Johnston Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwYQCxSSuSL18skCWG8QHFswOJ3hjovHsOZUE346i4OpVQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: clarify that "excluded" ON CONFLICT is a single rowBruce Momjian2022-07-14
| | | | | | | | | | Original patch by David G. Johnston. Reported-by: David G. Johnston Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwa4J0+WuO7kW1PLbjoEvzPN+Q_j+P2bXxNnCLaszY7ZdQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 10