aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* doc: Fix link to FreeBSD documentation projectDaniel Gustafsson2022-09-12
| | | | | | | | The FreeBSD site was changed with a redirect, which in turn seems to lead to a 404. Replace with the working link. Author: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe_JZRj+KPn=hACtwsg1iLRYs=jYvxG1NW4AnDeUL1GD-Q@mail.gmail.com
* Fix NaN comparison in circle_same testDaniel Gustafsson2022-09-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit c4c340088 changed geometric operators to use float4 and float8 functions, and handle NaN's in a better way. The circle sameness test had a typo in the code which resulted in all comparisons with the left circle having a NaN radius considered same. postgres=# select '<(0,0),NaN>'::circle ~= '<(0,0),1>'::circle; ?column? ---------- t (1 row) This fixes the sameness test to consider the radius of both the left and right circle. Backpatch to v12 where this was introduced. Author: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAo8dK=yctg2ZzjJuzV4zgOPBxRU5+Kb+yatFiddtQk6Rw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: v12
* Fix possible omission of variable storage markers in ECPG.Tom Lane2022-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The ECPG preprocessor converted code such as static varchar str1[10], str2[20], str3[30]; into static struct varchar_1 { int len; char arr[ 10 ]; } str1 ; struct varchar_2 { int len; char arr[ 20 ]; } str2 ; struct varchar_3 { int len; char arr[ 30 ]; } str3 ; thus losing the storage attribute for the later variables. Repeat the declaration for each such variable. (Note that this occurred only for variables declared "varchar" or "bytea", which may help explain how it escaped detection for so long.) Andrey Sokolov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/942241662288242@mail.yandex.ru
* Reject bogus output from uuid_create(3).Tom Lane2022-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When using the BSD UUID functions, contrib/uuid-ossp expects uuid_create() to produce a version-1 UUID. FreeBSD still does so, but in recent NetBSD releases that function produces a version-4 (random) UUID instead. That's not acceptable for our purposes: if the user wanted v4 she would have asked for v4, not v1. Hence, check the version digit and complain if it's not '1'. Also drop the documentation's claim that the NetBSD implementation is usable. It might be, depending on which OS version you're using, but we're not going to get into that kind of detail. (Maybe someday we should ditch all these external libraries and just write our own UUID code, but today is not that day.) Nazir Bilal Yavuz, with cosmetic adjustments and docs by me. Backpatch to all supported versions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3848059.1661038772@sss.pgh.pa.us Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17358-89806e7420797025@postgresql.org
* Choose FK name correctly during partition attachmentAlvaro Herrera2022-09-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | During ALTER TABLE ATTACH PARTITION, if the name of a parent's foreign key constraint is already used on the partition, the code tries to choose another one before the FK attributes list has been populated, so the resulting constraint name was "<relname>__fkey" instead of "<relname>_<attrs>_fkey". Repair, and add a test case. Backpatch to 12. In 11, the code to attach a partition was not smart enough to cope with conflicting constraint names, so the problem doesn't exist there. Author: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220901184156.738ebee5@karst
* Further fixes for MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK fix.Tom Lane2022-09-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some more things I didn't think about in commits 3f7323cbb et al: MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK subplans might have been converted to initplans instead of regular subplans, in which case they won't show up in the modified targetlist. Fortunately, this would only happen if they have no input parameters, which means that the problem we originally needed to fix can't happen with them. Therefore, there's no need to clone their output parameters, and thus it doesn't hurt that we'll fail to see them in the first pass over the targetlist. Nonetheless, this complicates matters greatly, because now we have to distinguish output Params of initplans (which shouldn't get renumbered) from those of regular subplans (which should). This also breaks the simplistic scheme I used of assuming that the subplans found in the targetlist have consecutive subLinkIds. We really can't avoid the need to know the subplans' subLinkIds in this code. To fix that, add subLinkId as the last field of SubPlan. We can get away with that change in back branches because SubPlan nodes will never be stored in the catalogs, and there's no ABI break for external code that might be looking at the existing fields of SubPlan. Secondly, rewriteTargetListIU might have rolled up multiple FieldStores or SubscriptingRefs into one targetlist entry, breaking the assumption that there's at most one Param to fix per targetlist entry. (That assumption is OK I think in the ruleutils.c code I stole the logic from in 18f51083c, because that only deals with pre-rewrite query trees. But it's definitely not OK here.) Abandon that shortcut and just do a full tree walk on the targetlist to ensure we find all the Params we have to change. Per bug #17606 from Andre Lin. As before, only v10-v13 need the patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17606-e5c8ad18d31db96a@postgresql.org
* Backpatch nbtree page deletion hardening.Peter Geoghegan2022-09-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Postgres 14 commit 5b861baa taught nbtree VACUUM to tolerate buggy opclasses. VACUUM's inability to locate a to-be-deleted page's downlink in the parent page was logged instead of throwing an error. VACUUM could just press on with vacuuming the index, and vacuuming the table as a whole. There are now anecdotal reports of this error causing problems that were much more disruptive than the underlying index corruption ever could be. Anything that makes VACUUM unable to make forward progress against one table/index ultimately risks making the system enter xidStopLimit mode. There is no good reason to take any chances here, so backpatch the hardening commit. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzm9HR6Pow=t-iQa57zT8qmX6_M4h14F-pTtb=xFDW5FBA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 10-13 (all supported versions that lacked the hardening)
* Doc: clarify partitioned table limitationsDavid Rowley2022-09-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Improve documentation regarding the limitations of unique and primary key constraints on partitioned tables. The existing documentation didn't make it clear that the constraint columns had to be present in the partition key as bare columns. The reader could be led to believe that it was ok to include the constraint columns as part of a function call's parameters or as part of an expression. Additionally, the documentation didn't mention anything about the fact that we disallow unique and primary key constraints if the partition keys contain *any* function calls or expressions, regardless of if the constraint columns appear as columns elsewhere in the partition key. The confusion here was highlighted by a report on the general mailing list by James Vanns. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH7vdhNF0EdYZz3GLpgE3RSJLwWLhEk7A_fiKS9dPBT3Dz_3eA@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvoU-u9iTqKjteYRFfi+UNEk7dbSAcyxEQD==vZt9B1KnA@mail.gmail.com Reviewed-by: Erik Rijkers Backpatch-through: 11
* doc: simplify docs about analyze and inheritance/partitionsBruce Momjian2022-09-02
| | | | | | Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YxAqYijOsLzgLQgy@momjian.us Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: clarify recursion internal behaviorBruce Momjian2022-09-02
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: Drew DeVault Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211018091720.31299-1-sir@cmpwn.com Backpatch-through: 10
* Fix oversight in recent MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK fix.Tom Lane2022-09-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commits 3f7323cbb et al missed the possibility that the Params they are looking for could be buried under implicit coercions, as well as other stuff that processIndirection() could add to the original targetlist entry. Copy the code in ruleutils.c that deals with such cases. (I thought about refactoring so that there's just one copy; but seeing that we only need this in old back branches, it seems not worth the trouble.) Per off-list report from Andre Lin. As before, only v10-v13 need the patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17596-c5357f61427a81dc@postgresql.org
* Fix some possibly latent bugs in slab.cDavid Rowley2022-09-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Primarily, this fixes an incorrect calculation in SlabCheck which was looking in the wrong byte for the sentinel check. The reason that we've never noticed this before in the form of a failing sentinel check is because the pre-check to this always fails because all current core users of slab contexts have a chunk size which is already MAXALIGNed, therefore there's never any space for the sentinel byte. It is possible that an extension needs to use a slab context and if they do with a chunk size that's not MAXALIGNed, then they'll likely get errors about overwritten sentinel bytes. Additionally, this patch changes various calculations which are being done based on the sizeof(SlabBlock). Currently, sizeof(SlabBlock) is a multiple of 8, therefore sizeof(SlabBlock) is the same as MAXALIGN(sizeof(SlabBlock)), however, if we were to ever have to add any fields to that struct as part of a bug fix, then SlabAlloc could end up returning a non-MAXALIGNed pointer. To be safe, let's ensure we always MAXALIGN sizeof(SlabBlock) before using it in any calculations. This patch has already been applied to master in d5ee4db0e. Diagnosed-by: Tomas Vondra, Tom Lane Author: Tomas Vondra, David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1%2B1JyW5TiL%3DyV-3Uq1CrfnTyn0Xrk5uArt31Z%3D8rgPhXQ%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: in create statistics docs, mention analyze for parent infoBruce Momjian2022-08-31
| | | | | | Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Yv1Bw8J+1pYfHiRl@momjian.us Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: mention "bloom" as a possible index access methodBruce Momjian2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | | | Also remove USING erroneously added recently. Reported-by: Jeff Janes Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1zhCpC7hottyMWM5Pimr9vRLprSwzLg+7PgajWhKZqRzw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: use FILTER in aggregate exampleBruce Momjian2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: michal.palenik@freemap.sk Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/163499710897.684.7420075366995883688@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: split out the NATURAL/CROSS JOIN in SELECT syntaxBruce Momjian2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | | | | This allows the syntax to be more accurate about what clauses are supported. Also switch an example query to use the ANSI join syntax. Reported-by: Joel Jacobson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/67b71d3e-0c22-44df-a223-351f14418319@www.fastmail.com Backpatch-through: 11
* Port regress-python3-mangle.mk to Solaris "sed", redux.Tom Lane2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Per experimentation and buildfarm failures, Solaris' "sed" has got some kind of problem with regexes that use both '*' and '[[:alpha:]]'. We can work around that by replacing '[[:alpha:]]' with '[a-zA-Z]', which is plenty good enough for our purposes, especially since this is only needed in long-stable branches. I chose to flat-out remove the second pattern of this sort, 's/except \([a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z.]*\), *\([a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z]*\):/except \1 as \2:/g' because we haven't needed it since 8.4. Follow-on to c3556f6fa, which probably missed catching this because the problematic pattern was already gone when that patch was written. Patch v10-v12 only, as the problem manifests only there. We have a line of dead code in v13-v14, which isn't worth changing, and the whole mess is gone as of v15. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/165561.1661984701@sss.pgh.pa.us
* doc: warn of SECURITY DEFINER schemas for non-sql_body functionsBruce Momjian2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | | | Non-sql_body functions are evaluated at runtime. Reported-by: Erki Eessaar Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM9PR01MB8268BF5E74E119828251FD34FE409@AM9PR01MB8268.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: mention that SET TIME ZONE often needs to be quotedBruce Momjian2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | | | Also mention that time zone abbreviations are not supported. Reported-by: philippe.godfrin@nov.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/163888728952.1269.5167822676466793158@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: document the maximum char/varchar length valueBruce Momjian2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: Japin Li Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/MEYP282MB1669B13E98AE531617CB1386B6979@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: show direction is optional in FETCH/MOVE's FROM/IN syntaxBruce Momjian2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | It used to show direction was required for FROM/IN. Reported-by: Rob <rirans@comcast.net> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211015165248.isqjceyilelhnu3k@localhost Author: Rob <rirans@comcast.net> Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: simplify WITH clause syntax in CREATE DATABASEBruce Momjian2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | | | Reported-by: Rob <rirans@comcast.net> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211016171149.yaouvlw5kvux6dvk@localhost Author: Rob <rirans@comcast.net> Backpatch-through: 10
* Prevent long-term memory leakage in autovacuum launcher.Tom Lane2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get_database_list() failed to restore the caller's memory context, instead leaving current context set to TopMemoryContext which is how CommitTransactionCommand() leaves it. The callers both think they are using short-lived contexts, for the express purpose of not having to worry about cleaning up individual allocations. The net effect therefore is that supposedly short-lived allocations could accumulate indefinitely in the launcher's TopMemoryContext. Although this has been broken for a long time, it seems we didn't have any obvious memory leak here until v15's rearrangement of the stats logic. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that there's no other leak at all, though, and we're surely at risk of adding one in future back-patched fixes. So back-patch to all supported branches, even though this may be only a latent bug in pre-v15. Reid Thompson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/972a4e12b68b0f96db514777a150ceef7dcd2e0f.camel@crunchydata.com
* In the Snowball dictionary, don't try to stem excessively-long words.Tom Lane2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the input word exceeds 1000 bytes, don't pass it to the stemmer; just return it as-is after case folding. Such an input is surely not a word in any human language, so whatever the stemmer might do to it would be pretty dubious in the first place. Adding this restriction protects us against a known recursion-to-stack-overflow problem in the Turkish stemmer, and it seems like good insurance against any other safety or performance issues that may exist in the Snowball stemmers. (I note, for example, that they contain no CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS calls, so we really don't want them running for a long time.) The threshold of 1000 bytes is arbitrary. An alternative definition could have been to treat such words as stopwords, but that seems like a bigger break from the old behavior. Per report from Egor Chindyaskin and Alexander Lakhin. Thanks to Olly Betts for the recommendation to fix it this way. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1661334672.728714027@f473.i.mail.ru
* On NetBSD, force dynamic symbol resolution at postmaster start.Tom Lane2022-08-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The default of lazy symbol resolution means that when the postmaster first reaches the select() call in ServerLoop, it'll need to resolve the link to that libc entry point. NetBSD's dynamic loader takes an internal lock while doing that, and if a signal interrupts the operation then there is a risk of self-deadlock should the signal handler do anything that requires that lock, as several of the postmaster signal handlers do. The window for this is pretty narrow, and timing considerations make it unlikely that a signal would arrive right then anyway. But it's semi-repeatable on slow single-CPU machines, and in principle the race could happen with any hardware. The least messy solution to this is to force binding of dynamic symbols at postmaster start, using the "-z now" linker option. While we're at it, also use "-z relro" so as to provide a small security gain. It's not entirely clear whether any other platforms share this issue, but for now we'll assume it's NetBSD-specific. (We might later try to use "-z now" on more platforms for performance reasons, but that would not likely be something to back-patch.) Report and patch by me; the idea to fix it this way is from Andres Freund. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3384826.1661802235@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Prevent WAL corruption after a standby promotion.Robert Haas2022-08-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a PostgreSQL instance performing archive recovery but not using standby mode is promoted, and the last WAL segment that it attempted to read ended in a partial record, the previous code would create invalid WAL on the new timeline. The WAL from the previously timeline would be copied to the new timeline up until the end of the last valid record, but instead of beginning to write WAL at immediately afterwards, the promoted server would write an overwrite contrecord at the beginning of the next segment. The end of the previous segment would be left as all-zeroes, resulting in failures if anything tried to read WAL from that file. The root of the issue is that ReadRecord() decides whether to set abortedRecPtr and missingContrecPtr based on the value of StandbyMode, but ReadRecord() switches to a new timeline based on the value of ArchiveRecoveryRequested. We shouldn't try to write an overwrite contrecord if we're switching to a new timeline, so change the test in ReadRecod() to check ArchiveRecoveryRequested instead. Code fix by Dilip Kumar. Comments by me incorporating suggested language from Álvaro Herrera. Further review from Kyotaro Horiguchi and Sami Imseih. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-t7umki=PK8dT1tcPV=mOUe2vNhHML6b3T7W7qqvvajjg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/FB0DEA0B-E14E-43A0-811F-C1AE93D00FF3%40amazon.com
* Doc: fix example of recursive query.Tom Lane2022-08-28
| | | | | | | | Compute total number of sub-parts correctly, per jason@banfelder.net Simon Riggs Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/166161184718.1235920.6304070286124217754@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Repair rare failure of MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK subplans in inherited updates.Tom Lane2022-08-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Prior to v14, if we have a MULTIEXPR SubPlan (that is, use of the syntax UPDATE ... SET (c1, ...) = (SELECT ...)) in an UPDATE with an inherited or partitioned target table, inheritance_planner() will clone the targetlist and therefore also the MULTIEXPR SubPlan and the Param nodes referencing it for each child target table. Up to now, we've allowed all the clones to share the underlying subplan as well as the output parameter IDs -- that is, the runtime ParamExecData slots. That technique is borrowed from the far older code that supports initplans, and it works okay in that case because the cloned SubPlan nodes are essentially identical. So it doesn't matter which one of the clones the shared ParamExecData.execPlan field might point to. However, this fails to hold for MULTIEXPR SubPlans, because they can have nonempty "args" lists (values to be passed into the subplan), and those lists could get mutated to different states in the various clones. In the submitted reproducer, as well as the test case added here, one clone contains Vars with varno OUTER_VAR where another has INNER_VAR, because the child tables are respectively on the outer or inner side of the join. Sharing the execPlan pointer can result in trying to evaluate an args list that doesn't match the local execution state, with mayhem ensuing. The result often is to trigger consistency checks in the executor, but I believe this could end in a crash or incorrect updates. To fix, assign new Param IDs to each of the cloned SubPlans, so that they don't share ParamExecData slots at runtime. It still seems fine for the clones to share the underlying subplan, and extra ParamExecData slots are cheap enough that this fix shouldn't cost much. This has been busted since we invented MULTIEXPR SubPlans in 9.5. Probably the lack of previous reports is because query plans in which the different clones of a MULTIEXPR mutate to effectively-different states are pretty rare. There's no issue in v14 and later, because without inheritance_planner() there's never a reason to clone MULTIEXPR SubPlans. Per bug #17596 from Andre Lin. Patch v10-v13 only. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17596-c5357f61427a81dc@postgresql.org
* Fix typo in comment.Etsuro Fujita2022-08-26
|
* Defend against stack overrun in a few more places.Tom Lane2022-08-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SplitToVariants() in the ispell code, lseg_inside_poly() in geo_ops.c, and regex_selectivity_sub() in selectivity estimation could recurse until stack overflow; fix by adding check_stack_depth() calls. So could next() in the regex compiler, but that case is better fixed by converting its tail recursion to a loop. (We probably get better code that way too, since next() can now be inlined into its sole caller.) There remains a reachable stack overrun in the Turkish stemmer, but we'll need some advice from the Snowball people about how to fix that. Per report from Egor Chindyaskin and Alexander Lakhin. These mistakes are old, so back-patch to all supported branches. Richard Guo and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1661334672.728714027@f473.i.mail.ru
* Doc: document possible need to raise kernel's somaxconn limit.Tom Lane2022-08-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | On fast machines, it's possible for applications such as pgbench to issue connection requests so quickly that the postmaster's listen queue overflows in the kernel, resulting in unexpected failures (with not-very-helpful error messages). Most modern OSes allow the queue size to be increased, so document how to do that. Per report from Kevin McKibbin. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADc_NKg2d+oZY9mg4DdQdoUcGzN2kOYXBu-3--RW_hEe0tUV=g@mail.gmail.com
* Doc: prefer sysctl to /proc/sys in docs and comments.Tom Lane2022-08-23
| | | | | | | | | sysctl is more portable than Linux's /proc/sys file tree, and often easier to use too. That's why most of our docs refer to sysctl when talking about how to adjust kernel parameters. Bring the few stragglers into line. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/361175.1661187463@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS while decoding changes.Amit Kapila2022-08-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | While decoding changes in a loop, if we skip all the changes there is no CFI making the loop uninterruptible. Reported-by: Whale Song and Andrey Borodin Bug: 17580 Author: Masahiko Sawada Reviwed-by: Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 10 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17580-849c1d5b6d7eb422@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B319ECD6-9A28-4CDF-A8F4-3591E0BF2369@yandex-team.ru
* Fix subtly-incorrect matching of parent and child partitioned indexes.Tom Lane2022-08-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When creating a partitioned index, DefineIndex tries to identify any existing indexes on the partitions that match the partitioned index, so that it can absorb those as child indexes instead of building new ones. Part of the matching is to compare IndexInfo structs --- but that wasn't done quite right. We're comparing the IndexInfo built within DefineIndex itself to one made from existing catalog contents by BuildIndexInfo. Notably, while BuildIndexInfo will run index expressions and predicates through expression preprocessing, that has not happened to DefineIndex's struct. The result is failure to match and subsequent creation of duplicate indexes. The easiest and most bulletproof fix is to build a new IndexInfo using BuildIndexInfo, thereby guaranteeing that the processing done is identical. While here, let's also extract the opfamily and collation data from the new partitioned index, removing ad-hoc logic that duplicated knowledge about how those are constructed. Per report from Christophe Pettus. Back-patch to v11 where we invented partitioned indexes. Richard Guo and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8864BFAA-81FD-4BF9-8E06-7DEB8D4164ED@thebuild.com
* doc: fix wrong tag used in create sequence manual.Tatsuo Ishii2022-08-16
| | | | | | | | | In ref/create_sequence.sgml <literal> tag was used for nextval function name. This should have been <function> tag. Author: Noboru Saito Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAM3qnJTDFFfRf5JHJ4AYrNcqXgMmj0pbH0%2Bvm%3DYva%2BpJyGymA%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 10
* Add missing bad-PGconn guards in libpq entry points.Tom Lane2022-08-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | There's a convention that externally-visible libpq functions should check for a NULL PGconn pointer, and fail gracefully instead of crashing. PQflush() and PQisnonblocking() didn't get that memo though. Also add a similar check to PQdefaultSSLKeyPassHook_OpenSSL; while it's not clear that ordinary usage could reach that with a null conn pointer, it's cheap enough to check, so let's be consistent. Daniele Varrazzo and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+mi_8Zm_mVVyW1iNFgyMd9Oh0Nv8-F+7Y3-BqwMgTMHuo_h2Q@mail.gmail.com
* Fix outdated --help message for postgres -fMichael Paquier2022-08-15
| | | | | | | | | | This option switch supports a total of 8 values, as told by set_plan_disabling_options() and the documentation, but this was not reflected in the output generated by --help. Author: Junwang Zhao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEG8a3+pT3cWzyjzKs184L1XMNm8NDnoJLiSjAYSO7XqpRh_vA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 10
* Preserve memory context of VarStringSortSupport buffers.Tom Lane2022-08-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When enlarging the work buffers of a VarStringSortSupport object, varstrfastcmp_locale was careful to keep them in the ssup_cxt memory context; but varstr_abbrev_convert just used palloc(). The latter creates a hazard that the buffers could be freed out from under the VarStringSortSupport object, resulting in stomping on whatever gets allocated in that memory later. In practice, because we only use this code for ICU collations (cf. 3df9c374e), the problem is confined to use of ICU collations. I believe it may have been unreachable before the introduction of incremental sort, too, as traditional sorting usually just uses one context for the duration of the sort. We could fix this by making the broken stanzas in varstr_abbrev_convert match the non-broken ones in varstrfastcmp_locale. However, it seems like a better idea to dodge the issue altogether by replacing the pfree-and-allocate-anew coding with repalloc, which automatically preserves the chunk's memory context. This fix does add a few cycles because repalloc will copy the chunk's content, which the existing coding assumes is useless. However, we don't expect that these buffer enlargement operations are performance-critical. Besides that, it's far from obvious that copying the buffer contents isn't required, since these stanzas make no effort to mark the buffers invalid by resetting last_returned, cache_blob, etc. That seems to be safe upon examination, but it's fragile and could easily get broken in future, which wouldn't get revealed in testing with short-to-moderate-size strings. Per bug #17584 from James Inform. Whether or not the issue is reachable in the older branches, this code has been broken on its own terms from its introduction, so patch all the way back. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17584-95c79b4a7d771f44@postgresql.org
* Catch stack overflow when recursing in transformFromClauseItem().Tom Lane2022-08-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Most parts of the parser can expect that the stack overflow check in transformExprRecurse() will trigger before things get desperate. However, transformFromClauseItem() can recurse directly to self without having analyzed any expressions, so it's possible to drive it to a stack-overrun crash. Add a check to prevent that. Per bug #17583 from Egor Chindyaskin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Richard Guo Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17583-33be55b9f981f75c@postgresql.org
* Add missing fields to _outConstraint()Peter Eisentraut2022-08-13
| | | | | | | | As of 897795240cfaaed724af2f53ed2c50c9862f951f, check constraints can be declared invalid. But that patch didn't update _outConstraint() to also show the relevant struct fields (which were only applicable to foreign keys before that). This currently only affects debugging output, so no impact in practice.
* pg_upgrade: Fix some minor code issuesPeter Eisentraut2022-08-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | 96ef3b8ff1cf1950e897fd2f766d4bd9ef0d5d56 accidentally copied a not applicable comment from the float8_pass_by_value code to the data_checksums code. Remove that. 87d3b35a1ca31a9d947a8f919a6006679216dff0 changed pg_upgrade to checking the checksum version rather than just the Boolean presence of checksums, but didn't change the field type in its ControlData struct from bool. So this would not work correctly if there ever is a checksum version larger than 1.
* doc: add missing role attributes to user management sectionBruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | Reported-by: Shinya Kato Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1ecdb1ff78e9b03dfce37e85eaca725a@oss.nttdata.com Author: Shinya Kato Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: add section about heap-only tuples (HOT)Bruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: Jonathan S. Katz Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c59ffbd5-96ac-a5a5-a401-14f627ca1405@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 11
* doc: warn about security issues around log filesBruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | Reported-by: Simon Riggs Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANP8+jJESuuXYq9Djvf-+tx2vY2OFLmfEuu+UvwHNJ1RT7iJCQ@mail.gmail.com Author: Simon Riggs Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: clarify configuration file for Windows buildsBruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | The use of file 'config.pl' was not clearly explained. Reported-by: liambowen@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/164246013804.31952.4958087335645367498@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: document the CREATE INDEX "USING" clauseBruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | Somehow this was in the syntax but had no description. Reported-by: robertcorrington@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/164228771825.31954.2719791849363756957@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 10
* doc: clarify CREATE TABLE AS ... IF NOT EXISTSBruce Momjian2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | Mention that the table is not modified if it already exists. Reported-by: frank_limpert@yahoo.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/164441177106.9677.5991676148704507229@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 10
* Fix _outConstraint() for "identity" constraintsPeter Eisentraut2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | The set of fields printed by _outConstraint() in the CONSTR_IDENTITY case didn't match the set of fields actually used in that case. (The code was probably uncarefully copied from the CONSTR_DEFAULT case.) Fix that by using the right set of fields. Since there is no read support for this node type, this is really just for debugging output right now, so it doesn't affect anything important.
* Back-Patch "Add wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests."Amit Kapila2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This was originally done in commit 0c20dd33db for 16 only, to eliminate duplicate code and as an infrastructure that makes it easier to write future tests. However, it has been suggested that it would be good to back-patch this testing infrastructure to aid future tests in back-branches. Backpatch to all supported versions. Author: Masahiko Sawada Reviewed by: Amit Kapila, Shi yu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoC-fvAkaKHa4t1urupwL8xbAcWRePeETvshvy80f6WV1A@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1oJBIf-0006sw-SA@gemulon.postgresql.org
* Fix catalog lookup with the wrong snapshot during logical decoding.Amit Kapila2022-08-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, we relied on HEAP2_NEW_CID records and XACT_INVALIDATION records to know if the transaction has modified the catalog, and that information is not serialized to snapshot. Therefore, after the restart, if the logical decoding decodes only the commit record of the transaction that has actually modified a catalog, we will miss adding its XID to the snapshot. Thus, we will end up looking at catalogs with the wrong snapshot. To fix this problem, this changes the snapshot builder so that it remembers the last-running-xacts list of the decoded RUNNING_XACTS record after restoring the previously serialized snapshot. Then, we mark the transaction as containing catalog changes if it's in the list of initial running transactions and its commit record has XACT_XINFO_HAS_INVALS. To avoid ABI breakage, we store the array of the initial running transactions in the static variables InitialRunningXacts and NInitialRunningXacts, instead of storing those in SnapBuild or ReorderBuffer. This approach has a false positive; we could end up adding the transaction that didn't change catalog to the snapshot since we cannot distinguish whether the transaction has catalog changes only by checking the COMMIT record. It doesn't have the information on which (sub) transaction has catalog changes, and XACT_XINFO_HAS_INVALS doesn't necessarily indicate that the transaction has catalog change. But that won't be a problem since we use snapshot built during decoding only to read system catalogs. On the master branch, we took a more future-proof approach by writing catalog modifying transactions to the serialized snapshot which avoids the above false positive. But we cannot backpatch it because of a change in the SnapBuild. Reported-by: Mike Oh Author: Masahiko Sawada Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Shi yu, Takamichi Osumi, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Bertrand Drouvot, Ahsan Hadi Backpatch-through: 10 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/81D0D8B0-E7C4-4999-B616-1E5004DBDCD2%40amazon.com
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-08-05 15:36:28 +0000