| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit d844cd75a disallowed rewind in a non-scrollable cursor to resolve
anomalies arising from such a cursor operation. However, this failed to
take into account the assumption in postgres_fdw that when rescanning a
foreign relation, it can rewind the cursor created for scanning the
foreign relation without specifying the SCROLL option, regardless of its
scrollability, causing this error when it tried to do such a rewind in a
non-scrollable cursor. Fix by modifying postgres_fdw to instead
recreate the cursor, regardless of its scrollability, when rescanning
the foreign relation. (If we had a way to check its scrollability, we
could improve this by rewinding it if it is scrollable and recreating it
if not, but we do not have it, so this commit modifies it to recreate it
in any case.)
Per bug #17889 from Eric Cyr. Devrim Gunduz also reported this problem.
Back-patch to v15 where that commit enforced the prohibition.
Reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17889-e8c39a251d258dda%40postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b415ac3255f8352d1ea921cf3b7ba39e0587768a.camel%40gunduz.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, when considering LIMIT pushdown, postgres_fdw failed to
check whether the query has this clause, which led to pushing false
LIMIT clauses, causing incorrect results.
This clause has been supported since v13, so we need to do a
remote-version check before deciding that it will be safe to push such a
clause, but we do not currently have a way to do the check (without
accessing the remote server); disable pushing such a clause for now.
Oversight in commit 357889eb1. Back-patch to v13, where that commit
added the support.
Per bug #18467 from Onder Kalaci.
Patch by Japin Li, per a suggestion from Tom Lane, with some changes to
the comments by me. Review by Onder Kalaci, Alvaro Herrera, and me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18467-7bb89084ff03a08d%40postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 7204f35919b7e021e8d1bc9f2d76fd6bfcdd2070,
thus restoring 66c0185a3 (Allow planner to use Merge Append to
efficiently implement UNION) as well as the follow-on commits
d5d2205c8, 3b1a7eb28, 7487044d6.
Per further discussion on pgsql-release, we wish to ship beta1 with
this feature, and patch the bug that was found just before wrap,
rather than shipping beta1 with the feature reverted.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts 66c0185a3 (Allow planner to use Merge Append to
efficiently implement UNION) as well as the follow-on commits
d5d2205c8, 3b1a7eb28, 7487044d6. In addition to those, 07746a8ef
had to be removed then re-applied in a different place, because
66c0185a3 moved the relevant code.
The reason for this last-minute thrashing is that depesz found a
case in which the patched code creates a completely wrong plan
that silently gives incorrect query results. It's unclear what
the cause is or how many cases are affected, but with beta1 wrap
staring us in the face, there's no time for closer investigation.
After we figure that out, we can decide whether to un-revert this
for beta2 or hold it for v18.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zktzf926vslR35Fv@depesz.com
(also some private discussion among pgsql-release)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The test fails when RESET statement_timeout takes longer than 10ms.
Avoid the problem by using SET LOCAL instead.
Overall, this test is not ideal: 10ms could be shorter than the time to
have sent the query to the "remote" server, so it's possible that on
some machines this test doesn't actually witness a remote query being
cancelled. We may want to improve on this someday by using some other
testing technique, but for now it's better than nothing. I verified
manually that one round of remote cancellation occurs when this runs on
my machine.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQRsdWnj=YaaPCnA8d7E1AdbxRPBYmyBQRMPUijR2MpM_w@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 61461a300c1c introduced new functions to libpq for cancelling
queries. This commit introduces a helper function that backend-side
libraries and extensions can use to invoke those. This function takes a
timeout and can itself be interrupted while it is waiting for a cancel
request to be sent and processed, instead of being blocked.
This replaces the usage of the old functions in postgres_fdw and dblink.
Finally, it also adds some test coverage for the cancel support in
postgres_fdw.
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQT_VgOWWENUqvUV9xQmbaCyXjtRRAYO8W07oqashk_N+g@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Until now, UNION queries have often been suboptimal as the planner has
only ever considered using an Append node and making the results unique
by either using a Hash Aggregate, or by Sorting the entire Append result
and running it through the Unique operator. Both of these methods
always require reading all rows from the union subqueries.
Here we adjust the union planner so that it can request that each subquery
produce results in target list order so that these can be Merge Appended
together and made unique with a Unique node. This can improve performance
significantly as the union child can make use of the likes of btree
indexes and/or Merge Joins to provide the top-level UNION with presorted
input. This is especially good if the top-level UNION contains a LIMIT
node that limits the output rows to a small subset of the unioned rows as
cheap startup plans can be used.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Andy Fan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpb_63XQodmxKUF8vb9M7CxyUyT4sWvEgqeQU-GB7QFoQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For UNION ALL queries where a union child query contained a foreign
table, if the targetlist of that query contained a constant, and the
top-level query performed an ORDER BY which contained the column for the
constant value, then postgres_fdw would find the EquivalenceMember with
the Const and then try to produce an ORDER BY containing that Const.
This caused problems with INT typed Consts as these could appear to be
requests to order by an ordinal column position rather than the constant
value. This could lead to either an error such as:
ERROR: ORDER BY position <int const> is not in select list
or worse, if the constant value is a valid column, then we could just
sort by the wrong column altogether.
Here we fix this issue by just not including these Consts in the ORDER
BY clause.
In passing, add a new section for testing ORDER BY in the postgres_fdw
tests and move two existing tests which were misplaced in the WHERE
clause testing section into it.
Reported-by: Michał Kłeczek
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Richard Guo
Bug: #18381
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0714C8B8-8D82-4ABB-9F8D-A0C3657E7B6E%40kleczek.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18381-137456acd168bf93%40postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For ANY-SUBLINK, we adopted a two-stage pull-up approach to handle
different types of scenarios. In the first stage, the sublink is pulled up
as a subquery. Because of this, when writing this code, we did not have
the ability to perform lateral joins, and therefore, we were unable to
pull up Var with varlevelsup=1. Now that we have the ability to use
lateral joins, we can eliminate this limitation.
Author: Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Until now PostgreSQL has not been very smart about optimizing away IS
NOT NULL base quals on columns defined as NOT NULL. The evaluation of
these needless quals adds overhead. Ordinarily, anyone who came
complaining about that would likely just have been told to not include
the qual in their query if it's not required. However, a recent bug
report indicates this might not always be possible.
Bug 17540 highlighted that when we optimize Min/Max aggregates the IS NOT
NULL qual that the planner adds to make the rewritten plan ignore NULLs
can cause issues with poor index choice. That particular case
demonstrated that other quals, especially ones where no statistics are
available to allow the planner a chance at estimating an approximate
selectivity for can result in poor index choice due to cheap startup paths
being prefered with LIMIT 1.
Here we take generic approach to fixing this by having the planner check
for NOT NULL columns and just have the planner remove these quals (when
they're not needed) for all queries, not just when optimizing Min/Max
aggregates.
Additionally, here we also detect IS NULL quals on a NOT NULL column and
transform that into a gating qual so that we don't have to perform the
scan at all. This also works for join relations when the Var is not
nullable by any outer join.
This also helps with the self-join removal work as it must replace
strict join quals with IS NOT NULL quals to ensure equivalence with the
original query.
Author: David Rowley, Richard Guo, Andy Fan
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqg6XZDhYRPz0zgOcevSMo0d3vxA9DvHrZtKfqO30WTnw@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17540-7aa1855ad5ec18b4%40postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker, reviewed by Shubham Khanna. Some subtractions
by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/87le9fmi01.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SEMI-JOIN is deparsed as the EXISTS subquery. It references outer and inner
relations, so it should be evaluated as the condition in the upper-level WHERE
clause. The signatures of deparseFromExprForRel() and deparseRangeTblRef() are
revised so that they can add conditions to the upper level.
PgFdwRelationInfo now has a hidden_subquery_rels field, referencing the relids
used in the inner parts of semi-join. They can't be referred to from upper
relations and should be used internally for equivalence member searches.
The planner can create semi-join, which refers to inner rel vars in its target
list. However, we deparse semi-join as an exists() subquery. So we skip the
case when the target list references to inner rel of semi-join.
Author: Alexander Pyhalov
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Ian Lawrence Barwick, Yuuki Fujii, Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c9e2a757cf3ac2333714eaf83a9cc184@postgrespro.ru
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A WaitEventSet holds file descriptors or event handles (on Windows).
If FreeWaitEventSet is not called, those fds or handles are leaked.
Use ResourceOwners to track WaitEventSets, to clean those up
automatically on error.
This was a live bug in async Append nodes, if a FDW's
ForeignAsyncRequest function failed. (In back branches, I will apply a
more localized fix for that based on PG_TRY-PG_FINALLY.)
The added test doesn't check for leaking resources, so it passed even
before this commit. But at least it covers the code path.
In the passing, fix misleading comment on what the 'nevents' argument
to WaitEventSetWait means.
Report by Alexander Lakhin, analysis and suggestion for the fix by
Tom Lane. Fixes bug #17828.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin, Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/472235.1678387869@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cac169d68 adjusted DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST and that seems to have caused
a test to become unstable on 32-bit machines.
4b14e1871 tried to fix this as originally the plan was flipping between
a Nested Loop and Hash Join. That commit forced the Nested Loop, but
there's still flexibility to push or not push the sort to the remote
server and 32-bit seems to prefer to push and on 64-bit, the costs
prefer not to.
Here let's just turn off enable_sort to significantly encourage the sort
to take place on the remote server.
Reported-by: Michael Paquier, Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZUM2IhA8X2lrG50K@paquier.xyz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cac169d68 adjusted DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST and that seems to have caused
a test to become unstable on 32-bit machines. Try to make it stable
again.
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZUM2IhA8X2lrG50K@paquier.xyz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit e4106b252 should have updated this test, but did not; back-patch
to all supported branches.
Reviewed by Richard Guo.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK15nR0NXLSCKQAcqbZbTzrzd5MozowWnTnGfPkayndF43Q%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
quals.
This was disabled in commit 6f80a8d9c due to the lack of support for
handling of pseudoconstant quals assigned to replaced joins in
createplan.c. To re-allow it, this patch adds the support by 1)
modifying the ForeignPath and CustomPath structs so that if they
represent foreign and custom scans replacing a join with a scan, they
store the list of RestrictInfo nodes to apply to the join, as in
JoinPaths, and by 2) modifying create_scan_plan() in createplan.c so
that it uses that list in that case, instead of the baserestrictinfo
list, to get pseudoconstant quals assigned to the join, as mentioned in
the commit message for that commit.
Important item for the release notes: this is non-backwards-compatible
since it modifies the ForeignPath and CustomPath structs, as mentioned
above, and changes the argument lists for FDW helper functions
create_foreignscan_path(), create_foreign_join_path(), and
create_foreign_upper_path().
Richard Guo, with some additional changes by me, reviewed by Nishant
Sharma, Suraj Kharage, and Richard Guo.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADrsxdbcN1vejBaf8a%2BQhrZY5PXL-04mCd4GDu6qm6FigDZd6Q%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit e7cb7ee14, which introduced the infrastructure for FDWs and
custom scan providers to replace joins with scans, failed to add support
handling of pseudoconstant quals assigned to replaced joins in
createplan.c, leading to an incorrect plan without a gating Result node
when postgres_fdw replaced a join with such a qual.
To fix, we could add the support by 1) modifying the ForeignPath and
CustomPath structs to store the list of RestrictInfo nodes to apply to
the join, as in JoinPaths, if they represent foreign and custom scans
replacing a join with a scan, and by 2) modifying create_scan_plan() in
createplan.c to use that list in that case, instead of the
baserestrictinfo list, to get pseudoconstant quals assigned to the join;
but #1 would cause an ABI break. So fix by modifying the infrastructure
to just disallow replacing joins with such quals.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Reported by Nishant Sharma. Patch by me, reviewed by Nishant Sharma and
Richard Guo.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADrsxdbcN1vejBaf8a%2BQhrZY5PXL-04mCd4GDu6qm6FigDZd6Q%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The test inserted 70k rows into a foreign table, in order to verify
correct behavior with more than 65535 parameters, and was added in
response to a bug report.
However, this is rather expensive, especially when running the tests
under valgrind, CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS etc. It doesn't seem worth it to
keep running the test, so remove it from all branches (14+).
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2131017.1623451468@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a316a3bc fixed the code in build_simpl_rel() that propagates
RelOptInfo.userid from parent to child rels so that it works
correctly for the child rels of a UNION ALL subquery rel, though
no tests were added in that commit. So do so here.
As noted in the discussion, coming up with a test case in the core
regression suite for this fix has turned out to be tricky, so the
test case is added to the postgres_fdw's suite instead.
postgresGetForeignRelSize()'s use of user mapping for the user
specified in RelOptInfo.userid makes it relatively easier to craft
a test case around.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BHiwqH91GaFNXcXbLAM9L%3DzBwUmSyv699Mtv3i1_xtk9Xec_A%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Complete the task begun in 9c0a0e2ed: we don't want to use the
abbreviation "deleg" for GSS delegation in any user-visible places.
(For consistency, this also changes most internal uses too.)
Abhijit Menon-Sen and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/949048.1684639317@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The leak would show up when using batch inserts with foreign tables
included in a partition tree, as the slots used in the batch were not
reset once processed. In order to fix this problem, some
ExecClearTuple() are added to clean up the slots used once a batch is
filled and processed, mapping with the number of slots currently in use
as tracked by the counter ri_NumSlots.
This buffer refcount leak has been introduced in b676ac4 with the
addition of the executor facility to improve bulk inserts for FDWs, so
backpatch down to 14.
Alexander has provided the patch (slightly modified by me). The test
for postgres_fdw comes from me, based on the test case that the author
has sent in the report.
Author: Alexander Pyhalov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b035780a740efd38dc30790c76927255@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 14
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 3d03b24c3 (Revert Add support for Kerberos
credential delegation) which was committed on the grounds of concern
about portability, but on further review and discussion, it's clear that
we are better off explicitly requiring MIT Kerberos as that appears to
be the only GSSAPI library currently that's under proper maintenance
and ongoing development. The API used for storing credentials was added
to MIT Kerberos over a decade ago while for the other libraries which
appear to be mainly based on Heimdal, which exists explicitly to be a
re-implementation of MIT Kerberos, the API never made it to a released
version (even though it was added to the Heimdal git repo over 5 years
ago..).
This post-feature-freeze change was approved by the RMT.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZDDO6jaESKaBgej0%40tamriel.snowman.net
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 3d4fa227bce4294ce1cc214b4a9d3b7caa3f0454.
Per discussion and buildfarm, this depends on APIs that seem to not
be available on at least one platform (NetBSD). Should be certainly
possible to rework to be optional on that platform if necessary but bit
late for that at this point.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3286097.1680922218@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support GSSAPI/Kerberos credentials being delegated to the server by a
client. With this, a user authenticating to PostgreSQL using Kerberos
(GSSAPI) credentials can choose to delegate their credentials to the
PostgreSQL server (which can choose to accept them, or not), allowing
the server to then use those delegated credentials to connect to
another service, such as with postgres_fdw or dblink or theoretically
any other service which is able to be authenticated using Kerberos.
Both postgres_fdw and dblink are changed to allow non-superuser
password-less connections but only when GSSAPI credentials have been
delegated to the server by the client and GSSAPI is used to
authenticate to the remote system.
Authors: Stephen Frost, Peifeng Qiu
Reviewed-By: David Christensen
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CO1PR05MB8023CC2CB575E0FAAD7DF4F8A8E29@CO1PR05MB8023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
postgres_fdw aborts remote (sub)transactions opened on remote server(s)
in a local (sub)transaction one by one when the local (sub)transaction
aborts. This patch allows it to abort the remote (sub)transactions in
parallel to improve performance. This is enabled by the server option
"parallel_abort". The default is false.
Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by David Zhang.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK15FuPVGx3TGHKShsbPKKtF1y58-ZLcKoxfN-nqLj1dZ%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The view just added by commit 53fe7e6cb decompiles differently
in v15 than HEAD (presumably as a consequence of 47bb9db75).
That causes failures in cross-version upgrade testing.
We could teach AdjustUpgrade.pm to compensate for that, but it
seems less painful to just drop the view after we're done with it.
Per buildfarm.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
postgres_fdw will close its remote session if an sinval cache reset
occurs, since it's possible that that means some FDW parameters
changed. We had two tests that were trying to ensure that the
session remains alive by setting debug_discard_caches = 0; but
that's not sufficient. Even though the tests seem stable enough
in the buildfarm, they flap a lot under CI.
In the first test, which is checking the ability to recover from
a lost connection, we can stabilize the results by just not
caring whether pg_terminate_backend() finds a victim backend.
If a reset did happen, there won't be a session to terminate
anymore, but the test can proceed anyway. (Arguably, we are
then not testing the unintentional-disconnect case, but as long
as that scenario is exercised in most runs I think it's fine;
testing the reset-driven case is of value too.)
In the second test, which is trying to verify the application_name
displayed in pg_stat_activity by a remote session, we had a race
condition in that the remote session might go away before we can
fetch its pg_stat_activity entry. We can close that race and make
the test more certainly test what it intends to by arranging things
so that the remote session itself fetches its pg_stat_activity entry
(based on PID rather than a somewhat-circular assumption about the
application name).
Both tests now demonstrably pass under debug_discard_caches = 1,
so we can remove that hack.
Back-patch into relevant back branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230226194340.u44bkfgyz64c67i6@awork3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
EquivalenceClasses are now understood as applying within a "join
domain", which is a set of inner-joined relations (possibly underneath
an outer join). We no longer need to treat an EC from below an outer
join as a second-class citizen.
I have hopes of eventually being able to treat outer-join clauses via
EquivalenceClasses, by means of only applying deductions within the
EC's join domain. There are still problems in the way of that, though,
so for now the reconsider_outer_join_clause logic is still here.
I haven't been able to get rid of RestrictInfo.is_pushed_down either,
but I wonder if that could be recast using JoinDomains.
I had to hack one test case in postgres_fdw.sql to make it still test
what it was meant to, because postgres_fdw is inconsistent about
how it deals with quals containing non-shippable expressions; see
https://postgr.es/m/1691374.1671659838@sss.pgh.pa.us. That should
be improved, but I don't think it's within the scope of this patch
series.
Patch by me; thanks to Richard Guo for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/830269.1656693747@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When collecting ANALYZE sample on foreign tables, postgres_fdw fetched
all rows and performed the sampling locally. For large tables this means
transferring and immediately discarding large amounts of data.
This commit allows the sampling to be performed on the remote server,
transferring only the much smaller sample. The sampling is performed
using the built-in TABLESAMPLE methods (system, bernoulli) or random()
function, depending on the remote server version.
Remote sampling can be enabled by analyze_sampling on the foreign server
and/or foreign table, with supported values 'off', 'auto', 'system',
'bernoulli' and 'random'. The default value is 'auto' which uses either
'bernoulli' (TABLESAMPLE method) or 'random' (for remote servers without
TABLESAMPLE support).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix incorrect code which was trying to convert a Bitmapset of columns at
the attnums according to a parent table and transform them into the
equivalent Bitmapset with same attnums according to the given child table.
This code is new as of a61b1f748 and was failing to do the correct
translation when there was an intermediate parent table between 'rel' and
'top_parent_rel'.
Reported-by: Ranier Vilela
Author: Richard Guo, Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQArohfB_Gy%2BhcH2-bANUkxgjJiP%3DABq01_LgTNTbcNijag%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 927f453a9 disallowed batching added by commit b663a4136 to be
used for the inserts performed as part of cross-partition updates of
partitioned tables, mainly because the previous code in
nodeModifyTable.c couldn't handle pending inserts into foreign-table
partitions that are also UPDATE target partitions. But we don't have
such a limitation anymore (cf. commit ffbb7e65a), so let's allow for
this by removing from execPartition.c the restriction added by commit
927f453a9 that batching is only allowed if the query command type is
CMD_INSERT.
In postgres_fdw, since commit 86dc90056 changed it to effectively
disable cross-partition updates in the case where a foreign-table
partition chosen to insert rows into is also an UPDATE target partition,
allow batching in the case where a foreign-table partition chosen to
do so is *not* also an UPDATE target partition. This is enabled by the
"batch_size" option added by commit b663a4136, which is disabled by
default.
This patch also adjusts the test case added by commit 927f453a9 to
confirm that the inserts performed as part of a cross-partition update
of a partitioned table indeed uses batching.
Amit Langote, reviewed and/or tested by Georgios Kokolatos, Zhihong Yu,
Bharath Rupireddy, Hou Zhijie, Vignesh C, and me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA%2BHiwqH1Lz1yJmPs%3DaD-pzd_HLLynLHvq5iYeT9mB0bBV7oJ6w%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When incremental sorts were added in v13 a 1.5x pessimism factor was added
to the cost modal. Seemingly this was done because the cost modal only
has an estimate of the total number of input rows and the number of
presorted groups. It assumes that the input rows will be evenly
distributed throughout the presorted groups. The 1.5x pessimism factor
was added to slightly reduce the likelihood of incremental sorts being
used in the hope to avoid performance regressions where an incremental
sort plan was picked and turned out slower due to a large skew in the
number of rows in the presorted groups.
An additional quirk with the path generation code meant that we could
consider both a sort and an incremental sort on paths with presorted keys.
This meant that with the pessimism factor, it was possible that we opted
to perform a sort rather than an incremental sort when the given path had
presorted keys.
Here we remove the 1.5x pessimism factor to allow incremental sorts to
have a fairer chance at being chosen against a full sort.
Previously we would generally create a sort path on the cheapest input
path (if that wasn't sorted already) and incremental sort paths on any
path which had presorted keys. This meant that if the cheapest input path
wasn't completely sorted but happened to have presorted keys, we would
create a full sort path *and* an incremental sort path on that input path.
Here we change this logic so that if there are presorted keys, we only
create an incremental sort path, and create sort paths only when a full
sort is required.
Both the removal of the cost pessimism factor and the changes made to the
path generation make it more likely that incremental sorts will now be
chosen. That, of course, as with teaching the planner any new tricks,
means an increased likelihood that the planner will perform an incremental
sort when it's not the best method. Our standard escape hatch for these
cases is an enable_* GUC. enable_incremental_sort already exists for
this.
This came out of a report by Pavel Luzanov where he mentioned that the
master branch was choosing to perform a Seq Scan -> Sort -> Group
Aggregate for his query with an ORDER BY aggregate function. The v15 plan
for his query performed an Index Scan -> Group Aggregate, of course, the
aggregate performed the final sort internally in nodeAgg.c for the
aggregate's ORDER BY. The ideal plan would have been to use the index,
which provided partially sorted input then use an incremental sort to
provide the aggregate with the sorted input. This was not being chosen
due to the pessimism in the incremental sort cost modal, so here we remove
that and rationalize the path generation so that sort and incremental sort
plans don't have to needlessly compete. We assume that it's senseless
to ever use a full sort on a given input path where an incremental sort
can be performed.
Reported-by: Pavel Luzanov
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9f61ddbf-2989-1536-b31e-6459370a6baa%40postgrespro.ru
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit b663a4136, which allowed FDWs to INSERT rows in bulk, added to
nodeModifyTable.c code to flush pending inserts to the foreign-table
result relation(s) before completing processing of the ModifyTable node,
but the code failed to take into account the case where the INSERT query
has modifying CTEs, leading to incorrect results.
Also, that commit failed to flush pending inserts before firing BEFORE
ROW triggers so that rows are visible to such triggers.
In that commit we scanned through EState's
es_tuple_routing_result_relations or es_opened_result_relations list to
find the foreign-table result relations to which pending inserts are
flushed, but that would be inefficient in some cases. So to fix, 1) add
a List member to EState to record the insert-pending result relations,
and 2) modify nodeModifyTable.c so that it adds the foreign-table result
relation to the list in ExecInsert() if appropriate, and flushes pending
inserts properly using the list where needed.
While here, fix a copy-and-pasteo in a comment in ExecBatchInsert(),
which was added by that commit.
Back-patch to v14 where that commit appeared.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK16qutyCmyJJzgQOhfBq%3DNoGDqTB6O0QBZTihrbqre%2BoxA%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While directly targetting a foreign table with MERGE was already
expressly forbidden, we failed to catch the case of a partitioned table
that has a foreign table as a partition; and the result if you try is an
incomprehensible error. Fix that by adding a specific check.
Backpatch to 15.
Reported-by: Tatsuhiro Nakamori <bt22nakamorit@oss.nttdata.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bt22nakamorit@oss.nttdata.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 3d956d956 allowed the COPY, but it's done by inserting individual
rows to the foreign table, so it can be inefficient due to the overhead
caused by each round-trip to the foreign server. To improve performance
of the COPY in such a case, this patch allows batch insertion, by
extending the multi-insert machinery in CopyFrom() to the foreign-table
case so that we insert multiple rows to the foreign table at once using
the FDW callback routine added by commit b663a4136. This patch also
allows this for postgres_fdw. It is enabled by the "batch_size" option
added by commit b663a4136, which is disabled by default.
When doing batch insertion, we update progress of the COPY command after
performing the FDW callback routine, to count rows not suppressed by the
FDW as well as a BEFORE ROW INSERT trigger. For consistency, this patch
changes the timing of updating it for plain tables: previously, we
updated it immediately after adding each row to the multi-insert buffer,
but we do so only after writing the rows stored in the buffer out to the
table using table_multi_insert(), which I think would be consistent even
with non-batching mode, because in that mode we update it after writing
each row out to the table using table_tuple_insert().
Andrey Lepikhov, heavily revised by me, with review from Ian Barwick,
Andrey Lepikhov, and Zhihong Yu.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bc489202-9855-7550-d64c-ad2d83c24867%40postgrespro.ru
|
| |
|
|
| |
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/b1f9f399-3a1a-b554-283f-4ae7f34608e2@enterprisedb.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The tlist of the EvalPlanQual outer plan for a ForeignScan node is
adjusted to produce a tuple whose descriptor matches the scan tuple slot
for the ForeignScan node. But in the case where the outer plan contains
an extra Sort node, if the new tlist contained columns required only for
evaluating PlaceHolderVars or columns required only for evaluating local
conditions, this would cause setrefs.c to fail with the error.
The cause of this is that when creating the outer plan by injecting the
Sort node into an alternative local join plan that could emit such extra
columns as well, we fail to arrange for the outer plan to propagate them
up through the Sort node, causing setrefs.c to fail to match up them in
the new tlist to what is available from the outer plan. Repair.
Per report from Alexander Pyhalov.
Richard Guo and Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Alexander Pyhalov and Tom Lane.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/cfb17bf6dfdf876467bd5ef533852d18%40postgrespro.ru
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When inserting a view referencing a foreign table that has WITH CHECK
OPTION constraints, in single-insert mode postgres_fdw retrieves the
data that was actually inserted on the remote side so that the WITH
CHECK OPTION constraints are enforced with the data locally, but in
batch-insert mode it cannot currently retrieve the data (except for the
row first inserted through the view), resulting in enforcing the WITH
CHECK OPTION constraints with the data passed from the core (except for
the first-inserted row), which led to incorrect results when inserting
into a view referencing a foreign table in which a remote BEFORE ROW
INSERT trigger changes the rows inserted through the view so that they
violate the view's WITH CHECK OPTION constraint. Also, the query
inserting into the view caused an assertion failure in assert-enabled
builds.
Fix these by disabling batch insertion when inserting into such a view.
Back-patch to v14 where batch insertion was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK17LpbTZs4m4a_6THP54UBeK9fHvX8aVVA%2BC6yEZDZwQcg%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggreagtes have, since implemented in Postgres, been
executed by always performing a sort in nodeAgg.c to sort the tuples in
the current group into the correct order before calling the transition
function on the sorted tuples. This was not great as often there might be
an index that could have provided pre-sorted input and allowed the
transition functions to be called as the rows come in, rather than having
to store them in a tuplestore in order to sort them once all the tuples
for the group have arrived.
Here we change the planner so it requests a path with a sort order which
supports the most amount of ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregate functions and
add new code to the executor to allow it to support the processing of
ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates where the tuples are already sorted in the
correct order.
Since there can be many ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates in any given query
level, it's very possible that we can't find an order that suits all of
these aggregates. The sort order that the planner chooses is simply the
one that suits the most aggregate functions. We take the most strictly
sorted variation of each order and see how many aggregate functions can
use that, then we try again with the order of the remaining aggregates to
see if another order would suit more aggregate functions. For example:
SELECT agg(a ORDER BY a),agg2(a ORDER BY a,b) ...
would request the sort order to be {a, b} because {a} is a subset of the
sort order of {a,b}, but;
SELECT agg(a ORDER BY a),agg2(a ORDER BY c) ...
would just pick a plan ordered by {a} (we give precedence to aggregates
which are earlier in the targetlist).
SELECT agg(a ORDER BY a),agg2(a ORDER BY b),agg3(a ORDER BY b) ...
would choose to order by {b} since two aggregates suit that vs just one
that requires input ordered by {a}.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Ronan Dunklau, James Coleman, Ranier Vilela, Richard Guo, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpHzfo92%3DR4W0%2BxVua3BUYCKMckWAmo-2t_KiXN-wYH%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't consider a constant of regconfig or other reg* types to be
shippable unless it refers to a built-in object, or an object in
an extension that's been marked shippable. Without this
restriction, we're too likely to send a constant that will fail
to parse on the remote server.
For the regconfig type only, consider OIDs up to 16383 to be
"built in", rather than the normal cutoff of 9999. Otherwise
the initdb-created text search configurations will be considered
unshippable, which is unlikely to make anyone happy.
It's possible that this new restriction will de-optimize queries
that were working satisfactorily before. Users can restore any
lost performance by making sure that objects that can be expected
to exist on the remote side are in shippable extensions. However,
that's not a change that people are likely to be happy about having
to make after a minor-release update. Between that consideration
and the lack of field complaints, let's just change this in HEAD.
Noted while fixing bug #17483, although this is not precisely
the problem that that report complained about.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1423433.1652722406@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The motivation for this is to ensure successful transmission of the
values of constants of regconfig and other reg* types. The remote
will be reading them with search_path = 'pg_catalog', so schema
qualification is necessary when referencing objects in other schemas.
Per bug #17483 from Emmanuel Quincerot. Back-patch to all supported
versions. (There's some other stuff to do here, but it's less
back-patchable.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1423433.1652722406@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now some foreign data wrappers support TRUNCATE command.
So it's useful to support TRUNCATE triggers on foreign tables for
audit logging or for preventing undesired truncation.
Author: Yugo Nagata
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao, Ian Lawrence Barwick
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220630193848.5b02e0d6076b86617a915682@sraoss.co.jp
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
mark_async_capable_plan(), which is called from create_append_plan() to
determine whether subplans are async-capable, failed to take into
account that the given subplan created from a given subpath might
include a gating Result node if the subpath is a SubqueryScanPath or
ForeignPath, causing a segmentation fault there when the subplan created
from a SubqueryScanPath includes the Result node, or causing
ExecAsyncRequest() to throw an error about an unrecognized node type
when the subplan created from a ForeignPath includes the Result node,
because in the latter case the Result node was unintentionally
considered as async-capable, but we don't currently support executing
Result nodes asynchronously. Fix by modifying mark_async_capable_plan()
to disable asynchronous execution in such cases. Also, adjust code in
the ProjectionPath case in mark_async_capable_plan(), for consistency
with other cases, and adjust/improve comments there.
is_async_capable_path() added in commit 27e1f1456, which was rewritten
to mark_async_capable_plan() in a later commit, has the same issue,
causing the error at execution mentioned above, so back-patch to v14
where the aforesaid commit went in.
Per report from Justin Pryzby.
Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Zhihong Yu and Justin Pryzby.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220408124338.GK24419%40telsasoft.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, we allowed this, but such triggers might query the table to
insert into and act differently if the tuples that have already been
processed and prepared for insertion are not there, so disable it in
such cases.
Back-patch to v14 where batch insert was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK16_uPqsmgK0-LpLSUk54_BoK13bPrhxhfjSoSTVz414hA%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In commit 27e1f1456, create_append_plan() only allowed the subplan
created from a given subpath to be executed asynchronously when it was
an async-capable ForeignPath. To extend coverage, this patch handles
cases when the given subpath includes some other Path types as well that
can be omitted in the plan processing, such as a ProjectionPath directly
atop an async-capable ForeignPath, allowing asynchronous execution in
partitioned-scan/partitioned-join queries with non-Var tlist expressions
and more UNION queries.
Andrey Lepikhov and Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Alexander Pyhalov and
Zhihong Yu.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/659c37a8-3e71-0ff2-394c-f04428c76f08%40postgrespro.ru
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
postgres_fdw would push ORDER BY clauses to the remote side without
verifying that the sort operator is safe to ship. Moreover, it failed
to print a suitable USING clause if the sort operator isn't default
for the sort expression's type. The net result of this is that the
remote sort might not have anywhere near the semantics we expect,
which'd be disastrous for locally-performed merge joins in particular.
We addressed similar issues in the context of ORDER BY within an
aggregate function call in commit 7012b132d, but failed to notice
that query-level ORDER BY was broken. Thus, much of the necessary
logic already existed, but it requires refactoring to be usable
in both cases.
Back-patch to all supported branches. In HEAD only, remove the
core code's copy of find_em_expr_for_rel, which is no longer used
and really should never have been pushed into equivclass.c in the
first place.
Ronan Dunklau, per report from David Rowley;
reviews by David Rowley, Ranier Vilela, and myself
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvr4OeC2DBVY--zVP83-K=bYrTD7F8SZDhN4g+pj2f2S-A@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
postgres_fdw commits remote (sub)transactions opened on remote server(s)
in a local (sub)transaction one by one when the local (sub)transaction
commits. This patch allows it to commit the remote (sub)transactions in
parallel to improve performance. This is enabled by the server option
"parallel_commit". The default is false.
Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Fujii Masao and David Zhang.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK17dAZCXvwnfpr1eTfknTGdt%3DhYTV9405Gt5SqPOX8K84w%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 6e0cb3dec1 allowed postgres_fdw.application_name to include
escape sequences %a (application name), %d (database name), %u (user name)
and %p (pid). In addition to them, this commit makes it support
the escape sequences for session ID (%c) and cluster name (%C).
These are helpful to investigate where each remote transactions came from.
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Ryohei Takahashi, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1041dc9a-c976-049f-9f14-e7d94c29c4b2@oss.nttdata.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
postgresReScanForeignScan().
Commit 27e1f1456 failed to process a pending asynchronous request made
for a given ForeignScan node in postgresReScanForeignScan() (if any) in
cases where we would only reset the next_tuple counter in that function,
contradicting the assumption that there should be no pending
asynchronous requests that have been made for async-capable subplans for
the parent Append node after ReScan. This led to an assert failure in
an assert-enabled build. I think this would also lead to mis-rewinding
the cursor in that function in the case where we have already fetched
one batch for the ForeignScan node and the asynchronous request has been
made for the second batch, because even in that case we would just reset
the counter when called from that function, so we would fail to execute
MOVE BACKWARD ALL.
To fix, modify that function to process the asynchronous request before
restarting the scan.
While at it, add a comment to a function to match other places.
Per bug #17344 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to v14 where the
aforesaid commit came in.
Patch by me. Test case by Alexander Lakhin, adjusted by me. Reviewed
and tested by Alexander Lakhin and Dmitry Dolgov.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17344-226b78b00de73a7e@postgresql.org
|
