aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/commands/copy.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Redesign initialization of partition routing structuresAlvaro Herrera2018-11-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This speeds up write operations (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, COPY, as well as the future MERGE) on partitioned tables. This changes the setup for tuple routing so that it does far less work during the initial setup and pushes more work out to when partitions receive tuples. PartitionDispatchData structs for sub-partitioned tables are only created when a tuple gets routed through it. The possibly large arrays in the PartitionTupleRouting struct have largely been removed. The partitions[] array remains but now never contains any NULL gaps. Previously the NULLs had to be skipped during ExecCleanupTupleRouting(), which could add a large overhead to the cleanup when the number of partitions was large. The partitions[] array is allocated small to start with and only enlarged when we route tuples to enough partitions that it runs out of space. This allows us to keep simple single-row partition INSERTs running quickly. Redesign The arrays in PartitionTupleRouting which stored the tuple translation maps have now been removed. These have been moved out into a PartitionRoutingInfo struct which is an additional field in ResultRelInfo. The find_all_inheritors() call still remains by far the slowest part of ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting(). This commit just removes the other slow parts. In passing also rename the tuple translation maps from being ParentToChild and ChildToParent to being RootToPartition and PartitionToRoot. The old names mislead you into thinking that a partition of some sub-partitioned table would translate to the rowtype of the sub-partitioned table rather than the root partitioned table. Authors: David Rowley and Amit Langote, heavily revised by Álvaro Herrera Testing help from Jesper Pedersen and Kato Sho. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f_1RJyFquuCKRFHTdcXqoPX-PYqAd7nz=GVBwvGh4a6xA@mail.gmail.com
* Introduce notion of different types of slots (without implementing them).Andres Freund2018-11-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Upcoming work intends to allow pluggable ways to introduce new ways of storing table data. Accessing those table access methods from the executor requires TupleTableSlots to be carry tuples in the native format of such storage methods; otherwise there'll be a significant conversion overhead. Different access methods will require different data to store tuples efficiently (just like virtual, minimal, heap already require fields in TupleTableSlot). To allow that without requiring additional pointer indirections, we want to have different structs (embedding TupleTableSlot) for different types of slots. Thus different types of slots are needed, which requires adapting creators of slots. The slot that most efficiently can represent a type of tuple in an executor node will often depend on the type of slot a child node uses. Therefore we need to track the type of slot is returned by nodes, so parent slots can create slots based on that. Relatedly, JIT compilation of tuple deforming needs to know which type of slot a certain expression refers to, so it can create an appropriate deforming function for the type of tuple in the slot. But not all nodes will only return one type of slot, e.g. an append node will potentially return different types of slots for each of its subplans. Therefore add function that allows to query the type of a node's result slot, and whether it'll always be the same type (whether it's fixed). This can be queried using ExecGetResultSlotOps(). The scan, result, inner, outer type of slots are automatically inferred from ExecInitScanTupleSlot(), ExecInitResultSlot(), left/right subtrees respectively. If that's not correct for a node, that can be overwritten using new fields in PlanState. This commit does not introduce the actually abstracted implementation of different kind of TupleTableSlots, that will be left for a followup commit. The different types of slots introduced will, for now, still use the same backing implementation. While this already partially invalidates the big comment in tuptable.h, it seems to make more sense to update it later, when the different TupleTableSlot implementations actually exist. Author: Ashutosh Bapat and Andres Freund, with changes by Amit Khandekar Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
* Rejigger materializing and fetching a HeapTuple from a slot.Andres Freund2018-11-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously materializing a slot always returned a HeapTuple. As current work aims to reduce the reliance on HeapTuples (so other storage systems can work efficiently), that needs to change. Thus split the tasks of materializing a slot (i.e. making it independent from the underlying storage / other memory contexts) from fetching a HeapTuple from the slot. For brevity, allow to fetch a HeapTuple from a slot and materializing the slot at the same time, controlled by a parameter. For now some callers of ExecFetchSlotHeapTuple, with materialize = true, expect that changes to the heap tuple will be reflected in the underlying slot. Those places will be adapted in due course, so while not pretty, that's OK for now. Also rename ExecFetchSlotTuple to ExecFetchSlotHeapTupleDatum and ExecFetchSlotTupleDatum to ExecFetchSlotHeapTupleDatum, as it's likely that future storage methods will need similar methods. There already is ExecFetchSlotMinimalTuple, so the new names make the naming scheme more coherent. Author: Ashutosh Bapat and Andres Freund, with changes by Amit Khandekar Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
* Fix crash in multi-insert COPYPeter Eisentraut2018-10-17
| | | | | | | | | A bug introduced in 0d5f05cde011512e605bb2688d9b1fbb5b3ae152 considered the *previous* partition's triggers when deciding whether multi-insert can be used. Rearrange the code so that the current partition is considered. Author: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
* In the executor, use an array of pointers to access the rangetable.Tom Lane2018-10-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Instead of doing a lot of list_nth() accesses to es_range_table, create a flattened pointer array during executor startup and index into that to get at individual RangeTblEntrys. This eliminates one source of O(N^2) behavior with lots of partitions. (I'm not exactly convinced that it's the most important source, but it's an easy one to fix.) Amit Langote and David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Centralize executor's opening/closing of Relations for rangetable entries.Tom Lane2018-10-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Create an array estate->es_relations[] paralleling the es_range_table, and store references to Relations (relcache entries) there, so that any given RT entry is opened and closed just once per executor run. Scan nodes typically still call ExecOpenScanRelation, but ExecCloseScanRelation is no more; relation closing is now done centrally in ExecEndPlan. This is slightly more complex than one would expect because of the interactions with relcache references held in ResultRelInfo nodes. The general convention is now that ResultRelInfo->ri_RelationDesc does not represent a separate relcache reference and so does not need to be explicitly closed; but there is an exception for ResultRelInfos in the es_trig_target_relations list, which are manufactured by ExecGetTriggerResultRel and have to be cleaned up by ExecCleanUpTriggerState. (That much was true all along, but these ResultRelInfos are now more different from others than they used to be.) To allow the partition pruning logic to make use of es_relations[] rather than having its own relcache references, adjust PartitionedRelPruneInfo to store an RT index rather than a relation OID. Amit Langote, reviewed by David Rowley and Jesper Pedersen, some mods by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Use slots more widely in tuple mapping code and make naming more consistent.Andres Freund2018-10-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's inefficient to use a single slot for mapping between tuple descriptors for multiple tuples, as previously done when using ConvertPartitionTupleSlot(), as that means the slot's tuple descriptors change for every tuple. Previously we also, via ConvertPartitionTupleSlot(), built new tuples after the mapping even in cases where we, immediately afterwards, access individual columns again. Refactor the code so one slot, on demand, is used for each partition. That avoids having to change the descriptor (and allows to use the more efficient "fixed" tuple slots). Then use slot->slot mapping, to avoid unnecessarily forming a tuple. As the naming between the tuple and slot mapping functions wasn't consistent, rename them to execute_attr_map_{tuple,slot}. It's likely that we'll also rename convert_tuples_by_* to denote that these functions "only" build a map, but that's left for later. Author: Amit Khandekar and Amit Langote, editorialized by me Reviewed-By: Amit Langote, Amit Khandekar, Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9fR0wRNeAE8VqffNTyONS_UfFPRpqxhnD9Q42vZB+Jvpg@mail.gmail.com https://postgr.es/m/e4f9d743-cd4b-efb0-7574-da21d86a7f36%40lab.ntt.co.jp Backpatch: -
* Create an RTE field to record the query's lock mode for each relation.Tom Lane2018-09-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add RangeTblEntry.rellockmode, which records the appropriate lock mode for each RTE_RELATION rangetable entry (either AccessShareLock, RowShareLock, or RowExclusiveLock depending on the RTE's role in the query). This patch creates the field and makes all creators of RTE nodes fill it in reasonably, but for the moment nothing much is done with it. The plan is to replace assorted post-parser logic that re-determines the right lockmode to use with simple uses of rte->rellockmode. For now, just add Asserts in each of those places that the rellockmode matches what they are computing today. (In some cases the match isn't perfect, so the Asserts are weaker than you might expect; but this seems OK, as per discussion.) This passes check-world for me, but it seems worth pushing in this state to see if the buildfarm finds any problems in cases I failed to test. catversion bump due to change of stored rules. Amit Langote, reviewed by David Rowley and Jesper Pedersen, and whacked around a bit more by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Split ExecStoreTuple into ExecStoreHeapTuple and ExecStoreBufferHeapTuple.Andres Freund2018-09-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Upcoming changes introduce further types of tuple table slots, in preparation of making table storage pluggable. New storage methods will have different representation of tuples, therefore the slot accessor should refer explicitly to heap tuples. Instead of just renaming the functions, split it into one function that accepts heap tuples not residing in buffers, and one accepting ones in buffers. Previously one function was used for both, but that was a bit awkward already, and splitting will allow us to represent slot types for tuples in buffers and normal memory separately. This is split out from the patch introducing abstract slots, as this largely consists out of mechanical changes. Author: Ashutosh Bapat Reviewed-By: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180220224318.gw4oe5jadhpmcdnm@alap3.anarazel.de
* Allow multi-inserts during COPY into a partitioned tablePeter Eisentraut2018-08-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CopyFrom allows multi-inserts to be used for non-partitioned tables, but this was disabled for partitioned tables. The reason for this appeared to be that the tuple may not belong to the same partition as the previous tuple did. Not allowing multi-inserts here greatly slowed down imports into partitioned tables. These could take twice as long as a copy to an equivalent non-partitioned table. It seems wise to do something about this, so this change allows the multi-inserts by flushing the so-far inserted tuples to the partition when the next tuple does not belong to the same partition, or when the buffer fills. This improves performance when the next tuple in the stream commonly belongs to the same partition as the previous tuple. In cases where the target partition changes on every tuple, using multi-inserts slightly slows the performance. To get around this we track the average size of the batches that have been inserted and adaptively enable or disable multi-inserts based on the size of the batch. Some testing was done and the regression only seems to exist when the average size of the insert batch is close to 1, so let's just enable multi-inserts when the average size is at least 1.3. More performance testing might reveal a better number for, this, but since the slowdown was only 1-2% it does not seem critical enough to spend too much time calculating it. In any case it may depend on other factors rather than just the size of the batch. Allowing multi-inserts for partitions required a bit of work around the per-tuple memory contexts as we must flush the tuples when the next tuple does not belong the same partition. In which case there is no good time to reset the per-tuple context, as we've already built the new tuple by this time. In order to work around this we maintain two per-tuple contexts and just switch between them every time the partition changes and reset the old one. This does mean that the first of each batch of tuples is not allocated in the same memory context as the others, but that does not matter since we only reset the context once the previous batch has been inserted. Author: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
* Don't needlessly check the partition contraint twiceAlvaro Herrera2018-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Starting with commit f0e44751d717, ExecConstraints was in charge of running the partition constraint; commit 19c47e7c8202 modified that so that caller could request to skip that checking depending on some conditions, but that commit and 15ce775faa42 together introduced a small bug there which caused ExecInsert to request skipping the constraint check but have this not be honored -- in effect doing the check twice. This could have been fixed in a very small patch, but on further analysis of the involved function and its callsites, it turns out to be simpler to give the responsibility of checking the partition constraint fully to the caller, and return ExecConstraints to its original (pre-partitioning) shape where it only checked tuple descriptor-related constraints. Each caller must do partition constraint checking on its own schedule, which is more convenient after commit 2f178441044 anyway. Reported-by: David Rowley Author: David Rowley, Álvaro Herrera Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Amit Khandekar, Simon Riggs Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f8w8+awsxgea8wt7_UX8qzOQ=Tm1LD+U1fHqBAkXxkW2w@mail.gmail.com
* Widen COPY FROM's current-line-number counter from 32 to 64 bits.Tom Lane2018-05-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Because the code for the HEADER option skips a line when this counter is zero, a very long COPY FROM WITH HEADER operation would drop a line every 2^32 lines. A lesser but still unfortunate problem is that errors would show a wrong input line number for errors occurring beyond the 2^31'st input line. While such large input streams seemed impractical when this code was first written, they're not any more. Widening the counter (and some associated variables) to uint64 should be enough to prevent problems for the foreseeable future. David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f88yh-6wwEfO6QLEEvH3BEugOq2QX1TOja0vCauoynmOQ@mail.gmail.com
* Post-feature-freeze pgindent run.Tom Lane2018-04-26
| | | | Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15719.1523984266@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Allow insert and update tuple routing and COPY for foreign tables.Robert Haas2018-04-06
| | | | | | | | | | | Also enable this for postgres_fdw. Etsuro Fujita, based on an earlier patch by Amit Langote. The larger patch series of which this is a part has been reviewed by Amit Langote, David Fetter, Maksim Milyutin, Álvaro Herrera, Stephen Frost, and me. Minor documentation changes to the final version by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/29906a26-da12-8c86-4fb9-d8f88442f2b9@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Add default roles for file/program accessStephen Frost2018-04-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds new default roles named 'pg_read_server_files', 'pg_write_server_files', 'pg_execute_server_program' which allow an administrator to GRANT to a non-superuser role the ability to access server-side files or run programs through PostgreSQL (as the user the database is running as). Having one of these roles allows a non-superuser to use server-side COPY to read, write, or with a program, and to use file_fdw (if installed by a superuser and GRANT'd USAGE on it) to read from files or run a program. The existing misc file functions are also changed to allow a user with the 'pg_read_server_files' default role to read any files on the filesystem, matching the privileges given to that role through COPY and file_fdw from above. Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171231191939.GR2416%40tamriel.snowman.net
* Enforce child constraints during COPY TO a partitioned table.Robert Haas2018-04-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The previous coding inadvertently checked the constraints for the partitioned table rather than the target partition, which could lead to data in a partition that fails to satisfy some constraint on that partition. This problem seems to date back to when table partitioning was introduced; prior to that, there was only one target table for a COPY, so the problem didn't occur, and the code just didn't get updated. Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Amit Langote and Ashutosh Bapat Discussion: https://postgr.es/message-id/5ABA4074.1090500%40lab.ntt.co.jp
* Fix state reversal after partition tuple routingAlvaro Herrera2018-03-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We make some changes to ModifyTableState and the EState it uses whenever we route tuples to partitions; but we weren't restoring properly in all cases, possibly causing crashes when partitions with different tuple descriptors are targeted by tuples inserted in the same command. Refactor some code, creating ExecPrepareTupleRouting, to encapsulate the needed state changing logic, and have it invoked one level above its current place (ie. put it in ExecModifyTable instead of ExecInsert); this makes it all more readable. Add a test case to exercise this. We don't support having views as partitions; and since only views can have INSTEAD OF triggers, there is no point in testing for INSTEAD OF when processing insertions into a partitioned table. Remove code that appears to support this (but which is actually never relevant.) In passing, fix location of some very confusing comments in ModifyTableState. Reported-by: Amit Langote Author: Etsuro Fujita, Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr/es/m/0473bf5c-57b1-f1f7-3d58-455c2230bc5f@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Be lazier about partition tuple routing.Robert Haas2018-02-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's not necessary to fully initialize the executor data structures for partitions to which no tuples are ever routed. Consider, for example, an INSERT statement that inserts only one row: it only cares about the partition to which that one row is routed. The new function ExecInitPartitionInfo performs the initialization in question only when a particular partition is about to receive a tuple. This includes creating, validating, and saving a pointer to the ResultRelInfo, setting up for speculative insertions, translating WCOs and initializing the resulting expressions, translating returning lists and building the appropriate projection information, and setting up a tuple conversion map. One thing that's not deferred is locking the child partitions; that seems desirable but would need more thought. Still, testing shows that this makes single-row inserts significantly faster on a table with many partitions without harming the bulk-insert case. Amit Langote, reviewed by Etsuro Fujita, with a few changes by me Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/8975331d-d961-cbdd-f862-fdd3d97dc2d0@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Allow tupleslots to have a fixed tupledesc, use in executor nodes.Andres Freund2018-02-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The reason for doing so is that it will allow expression evaluation to optimize based on the underlying tupledesc. In particular it will allow to JIT tuple deforming together with the expression itself. For that expression initialization needs to be moved after the relevant slots are initialized - mostly unproblematic, except in the case of nodeWorktablescan.c. After doing so there's no need for ExecAssignResultType() and ExecAssignResultTypeFromTL() anymore, as all former callers have been converted to create a slot with a fixed descriptor. When creating a slot with a fixed descriptor, tts_values/isnull can be allocated together with the main slot, reducing allocation overhead and increasing cache density a bit. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171206093717.vqdxe5icqttpxs3p@alap3.anarazel.de
* Fix application of identity values in some casesPeter Eisentraut2018-02-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Investigation of 2d2d06b7e27e3177d5bef0061801c75946871db3 revealed that identity values were not applied in some further cases, including logical replication subscribers, VALUES RTEs, and ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN. To fix all that, apply the identity column expression in build_column_default() instead of repeating the same logic at each call site. For ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN ... IDENTITY, the previous coding completely ignored that existing rows for the new column should have values filled in from the identity sequence. The coding using build_column_default() fails for this because the sequence ownership isn't registered until after ALTER TABLE, and we can't do it before because we don't have the column in the catalog yet. So we specially remember in ColumnDef the sequence name that we decided on and build a custom NextValueExpr using that. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* Allow UPDATE to move rows between partitions.Robert Haas2018-01-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When an UPDATE causes a row to no longer match the partition constraint, try to move it to a different partition where it does match the partition constraint. In essence, the UPDATE is split into a DELETE from the old partition and an INSERT into the new one. This can lead to surprising behavior in concurrency scenarios because EvalPlanQual rechecks won't work as they normally did; the known problems are documented. (There is a pending patch to improve the situation further, but it needs more review.) Amit Khandekar, reviewed and tested by Amit Langote, David Rowley, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Dilip Kumar, Amul Sul, Thomas Munro, Álvaro Herrera, Amit Kapila, and me. A few final revisions by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9do9o2ccQ7j7+tSgiE1REY65XRiMb=yJO3u3QhyP8EEPQ@mail.gmail.com
* Factor error generation out of ExecPartitionCheck.Robert Haas2018-01-05
| | | | | | | | | | | At present, we always raise an ERROR if the partition constraint is violated, but a pending patch for UPDATE tuple routing will consider instead moving the tuple to the correct partition. Refactor to make that simpler. Amit Khandekar, reviewed by Amit Langote, David Rowley, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9cue54GbEzfV-61nyGpijvjZgCcghvLsB0_nL8Nm8HzCA@mail.gmail.com
* Simplify and encapsulate tuple routing support code.Robert Haas2018-01-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | Instead of having ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting return multiple out parameters, have it return a pointer to a structure containing all of those different things. Also, provide and use a cleanup function, ExecCleanupTupleRouting, instead of cleaning up all of the resources allocated by ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting individually. Amit Khandekar, reviewed by Amit Langote, David Rowley, and me Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9fWfxgKC+PfJZF3hkgAcNOy-LpfPxVYitDEXKHjeieWQQ@mail.gmail.com
* Update copyright for 2018Bruce Momjian2018-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.3
* Apply identity sequence values on COPYPeter Eisentraut2017-12-08
| | | | | | | | | | | A COPY into a table should apply identity sequence values just like it does for ordinary defaults. This was previously forgotten, leading to null values being inserted, which in turn would fail because identity columns have not-null constraints. Author: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> Reported-by: Steven Winfield <steven.winfield@cantabcapital.com> Bug: #14952
* Re-allow INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on partitioned tables.Robert Haas2017-12-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 8355a011a0124bdf7ccbada206a967d427039553 was reverted in f05230752d53c4aa74cffa9b699983bbb6bcb118, but this attempt is hopefully better-considered: we now pass the correct value to ExecOpenIndices, which should avoid the crash that we hit before. Amit Langote, reviewed by Simon Riggs and by me. Some final editing by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/7ff1e8ec-dc39-96b1-7f47-ff5965dceeac@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Update typedefs.list and re-run pgindentRobert Haas2017-11-29
| | | | Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaA9=1RWKtBWpDaj+sF3Stgc8sHgf5z=KGtbjwPLQVDMA@mail.gmail.com
* Centralize executor-related partitioning code.Robert Haas2017-11-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Some code is moved from partition.c, which has grown very quickly lately; splitting the executor parts out might help to keep it from getting totally out of control. Other code is moved from execMain.c. All is moved to a new file execPartition.c. get_partition_for_tuple now has a new interface that more clearly separates executor concerns from generic concerns. Amit Langote. A slight comment tweak by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/1f0985f8-3b61-8bc4-4350-baa6d804cb6d@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Change TRUE/FALSE to true/falsePeter Eisentraut2017-11-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The lower case spellings are C and C++ standard and are used in most parts of the PostgreSQL sources. The upper case spellings are only used in some files/modules. So standardize on the standard spellings. The APIs for ICU, Perl, and Windows define their own TRUE and FALSE, so those are left as is when using those APIs. In code comments, we use the lower-case spelling for the C concepts and keep the upper-case spelling for the SQL concepts. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* Ignore CatalogSnapshot when checking COPY FREEZE prerequisites.Noah Misch2017-11-05
| | | | | | | | | | This restores the ability, essentially lost in commit ffaa44cb559db332baeee7d25dedd74a61974203, to use COPY FREEZE under REPEATABLE READ isolation. Back-patch to 9.4, like that commit. Reviewed by Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoahWDm-7fperBxzU9uZ99LPMUmEpSXLTw9TmrOgzwnORw@mail.gmail.com
* Use ResultRelInfo ** rather than ResultRelInfo * for tuple routing.Robert Haas2017-10-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | The previous convention doesn't lend itself to creating ResultRelInfos lazily, as we already do in ExecGetTriggerResultRel. This patch doesn't make anything lazier than before, but the pending patch for UPDATE tuple routing proposes to do so (and there might be other opportunities as well). Amit Khandekar with some adjustments by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYPVP9Lyf6vUFA5DwxS4c--x6LOj2y36BsJaYtp62eXPQ@mail.gmail.com
* Replace remaining uses of pq_sendint with pq_sendint{8,16,32}.Andres Freund2017-10-11
| | | | | | | pq_sendint() remains, so extension code doesn't unnecessarily break. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170914063418.sckdzgjfrsbekae4@alap3.anarazel.de
* Replace most usages of ntoh[ls] and hton[sl] with pg_bswap.h.Andres Freund2017-10-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All postgres internal usages are replaced, it's just libpq example usages that haven't been converted. External users of libpq can't generally rely on including postgres internal headers. Note that this includes replacing open-coded byte swapping of 64bit integers (using two 32 bit swaps) with a single 64bit swap. Where it looked applicable, I have removed netinet/in.h and arpa/inet.h usage, which previously provided the relevant functionality. It's perfectly possible that I missed other reasons for including those, the buildfarm will tell. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170927172019.gheidqy6xvlxb325@alap3.anarazel.de
* Fix saving and restoring umaskPeter Eisentraut2017-09-22
| | | | | | In two cases, we set a different umask for some piece of code and restore it afterwards. But if the contained code errors out, the umask is not restored. So add TRY/CATCH blocks to fix that.
* Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature.Tom Lane2017-09-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Change tupledesc->attrs[n] to TupleDescAttr(tupledesc, n).Andres Freund2017-08-20
| | | | | | | | | | | This is a mechanical change in preparation for a later commit that will change the layout of TupleDesc. Introducing a macro to abstract the details of where attributes are stored will allow us to change that in separate step and revise it in future. Author: Thomas Munro, editorialized by Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0ZtQ-SpsgCyzzYpsXS6e=kZWqk3g5Ygn3MDV7A8dabUA@mail.gmail.com
* Fix interaction of triggers, partitioning, and EXPLAIN ANALYZE.Robert Haas2017-08-18
| | | | | | | | | | | Add a new EState member es_leaf_result_relations, so that the trigger code knows about ResultRelInfos created by tuple routing. Also make sure ExplainPrintTriggers knows about partition-related ResultRelInfos. Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Amit Langote Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/57163e18-8e56-da83-337a-22f2c0008051@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Final pgindent + perltidy run for v10.Tom Lane2017-08-14
|
* Use a real RT index when setting up partition tuple routing.Robert Haas2017-07-17
| | | | | | | | | | | Before, we always used a dummy value of 1, but that's not right when the partitioned table being modified is inside of a WITH clause rather than part of the main query. Amit Langote, reported and reviewd by Etsuro Fujita, with a comment change by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/ee12f648-8907-77b5-afc0-2980bcb0aa37@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Fix COPY's handling of transition tables with indexes.Andrew Gierth2017-07-10
| | | | | | | | | Commit c46c0e5202e8cfe750c6629db7852fdb15d528f3 failed to pass the TransitionCaptureState object to ExecARInsertTriggers() in the case where it's using heap_multi_insert and there are indexes. Repair. Thomas Munro, from a report by David Fetter Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170708084213.GA14720%40fetter.org
* Fix transition tables for wCTEs.Andrew Gierth2017-06-28
| | | | | | | | | The original coding didn't handle this case properly; each separate DML substatement needs its own set of transitions. Patch by Thomas Munro Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAL9smLCDQ%3D2o024rBgtD4WihzX8B3C6u_oSQ2K3%2BR5grJrV0bg%40mail.gmail.com
* Fix transition tables for partition/inheritance.Andrew Gierth2017-06-28
| | | | | | | | | | | We disallow row-level triggers with transition tables on child tables. Transition tables for triggers on the parent table contain only those columns present in the parent. (We can't mix tuple formats in a single transition table.) Patch by Thomas Munro Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BTgmoZzTBBAsEUh4MazAN7ga%3D8SsMC-Knp-6cetts9yNZUCcg%40mail.gmail.com
* Phase 3 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they flow past the right margin. By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin, then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin, if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column limit. This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers. Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Phase 2 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Initial pgindent run with pg_bsd_indent version 2.0.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The new indent version includes numerous fixes thanks to Piotr Stefaniak. The main changes visible in this commit are: * Nicer formatting of function-pointer declarations. * No longer unexpectedly removes spaces in expressions using casts, sizeof, or offsetof. * No longer wants to add a space in "struct structname *varname", as well as some similar cases for const- or volatile-qualified pointers. * Declarations using PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY are formatted more nicely. * Fixes bug where comments following declarations were sometimes placed with no space separating them from the code. * Fixes some odd decisions for comments following case labels. * Fixes some cases where comments following code were indented to less than the expected column 33. On the less good side, it now tends to put more whitespace around typedef names that are not listed in typedefs.list. This might encourage us to put more effort into typedef name collection; it's not really a bug in indent itself. There are more changes coming after this round, having to do with comment indentation and alignment of lines appearing within parentheses. I wanted to limit the size of the diffs to something that could be reviewed without one's eyes completely glazing over, so it seemed better to split up the changes as much as practical. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Re-run pgindent.Tom Lane2017-06-13
| | | | | | | | This is just to have a clean base state for testing of Piotr Stefaniak's latest version of FreeBSD indent. I fixed up a couple of places where pgindent would have changed format not-nicely. perltidy not included. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/VI1PR03MB119959F4B65F000CA7CD9F6BF2CC0@VI1PR03MB1199.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com
* Prevent BEFORE triggers from violating partitioning constraints.Robert Haas2017-06-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since tuple-routing implicitly checks the partitioning constraints at least for the levels of the partitioning hierarchy it traverses, there's normally no need to revalidate the partitioning constraint after performing tuple routing. However, if there's a BEFORE trigger on the target partition, it could modify the tuple, causing the partitioning constraint to be violated. Catch that case. Also, instead of checking the root table's partition constraint after tuple-routing, check it beforehand. Otherwise, the rules for when the partitioning constraint gets checked get too complicated, because you sometimes have to check part of the constraint but not all of it. This effectively reverts commit 39162b2030fb0a35a6bb28dc636b5a71b8df8d1c in favor of a different approach altogether. Report by me. Initial debugging by Jeevan Ladhe. Patch by Amit Langote, reviewed by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmoa9DTgeVOqopieV8d1QRpddmP65aCdxyjdYDoEO5pS5KA@mail.gmail.com
* Allow parallelism in COPY (query) TO ...;Andres Freund2017-06-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously this was not allowed, as copy.c didn't set the CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK flag when planning the query. Set it. While the lack of parallel query for COPY isn't strictly speaking a bug, it does prevent parallelism from being used in a facility commonly used to run long running queries. Thus backpatch to 9.6. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170531231958.ihanapplorptykzm@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.6, where parallelism was introduced.
* Post-PG 10 beta1 pgindent runBruce Momjian2017-05-17
| | | | perltidy run not included.
* Fix relcache leak when row triggers on partitions are fired by COPY.Robert Haas2017-05-16
| | | | | | Thomas Munro, reviewed by Amit Langote Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=15Jss-yhFApuKzxcoCuFnb8TR8iQiWMjG=CLYPx48QLw@mail.gmail.com
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-06-08 03:33:19 +0000