| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were failing to set conislocal correctly for constraints in
partitions after partition detach, leading to those constraints becoming
undroppable. Fix by setting the flag correctly. Existing databases
might contain constraints with the conislocal wrongly set to false, for
partitions that were detached; this situation should be fixable by
applying an UPDATE on pg_constraint to set conislocal true. This
problem should otherwise be innocuous and should disappear across a
dump/restore or pg_upgrade.
Secondarily, when constraint drop was attempted in a partitioned table,
ATExecDropConstraint would try to recurse to partitions after doing
performDeletion() of the constraint in the partitioned table itself; but
since the constraint in the partitions are dropped by the initial call
of performDeletion() (because of following dependencies), the recursion
step would fail since it would not find the constraint, causing the
whole operation to fail. Fix by preventing recursion.
Reported-by: Amit Langote
Diagnosed-by: Amit Langote
Author: Amit Langote, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f2b8ead5-4131-d5a8-8016-2ea0a31250af@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original coding was too baroque and led to an use-after-release
mistake, noticed by buildfarm member prion.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21693.1548305934@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I (Álvaro) forgot to do this in eb7ed3f30634, leading to undroppable
constraints after partitions are detached. Repair.
Reported-by: Amit Langote
Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c1c9b688-b886-84f7-4048-1e4ebe9b1d06@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Detaching a partition from a partitioned table that's constrained by
foreign keys requires additional action triggers on the referenced side;
otherwise, DELETE/UPDATE actions there fail to notice rows in the table
that was partition, and so are incorrectly allowed through. With this
commit, those triggers are now created. Conversely, when a table that
has a foreign key is attached as a partition to a table that also has
the same foreign key, those action triggers are no longer needed, so we
remove them.
Add a minimal test case verifying (part of) this.
Authors: Amit Langote, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f2b8ead5-4131-d5a8-8016-2ea0a31250af@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When creating a foreign key in a partitioned table, if some partitions
already have equivalent constraints, we wastefully create duplicates of
the constraints instead of attaching to the existing ones. That's
inconsistent with the de-duplication that is applied when a table is
attached as a partition. To fix, reuse the FK-cloning code instead of
having a separate code path.
Backpatch to Postgres 11. This is a subtle behavior change, but surely
a welcome one since there's no use in having duplicate foreign keys.
Discovered by Álvaro Herrera while thinking about a different problem
reported by Jesper Pedersen (bug #15587).
Author: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/201901151935.zfadrzvyof4k@alvherre.pgsql
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
My commit 3de241dba86f introduced some code to create a clone of a
foreign key to a partition, but I put it in pg_constraint.c because it
was too close to the contents of the pg_constraint row. With the
previous commit that split out the constraint tuple deconstruction into
its own routine, it makes more sense to have the FK-cloning function in
tablecmds.c, mostly because its static subroutine can then be used by a
future bugfix.
My initial posting of this patch had this routine as static in
tablecmds.c, but sadly this function is already part of the Postgres 11
ABI as exported from pg_constraint.c, so keep it as exported also just
to avoid breaking any possible users of it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was an oversight in commit 3b174b1a3.
Per offline gripe from Alvaro Herrera
Backpatch to release 11.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was an oversight in commit 16828d5c. If the table is going to be
rewritten, we simply clear all the missing values from all the table's
attributes, since there will no longer be any rows with the attributes
missing. Otherwise, we repackage the missing value in an array
constructed with the new type specifications.
Backpatch to release 11.
This fixes bug #15446, reported by Dmitry Molotkov
Reviewed by Dean Rasheed
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Inheritance trees can include temporary tables if the parent is
permanent, which makes possible the presence of multiple temporary
children from different sessions. Trying to issue a TRUNCATE on the
parent in this scenario causes a failure, so similarly to any other
queries just ignore such cases, which makes TRUNCATE work
transparently.
This makes truncation behave similarly to any other DML query working on
the parent table with queries which need to be issues on children. A
set of isolation tests is added to cover basic cases.
Reported-by: Zhou Digoal
Author: Amit Langote, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15565-ce67a48d0244436a@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 9.4
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For probably bogus reasons, we acquire only AccessShareLock on the
partition when we try to detach it from its parent partitioned table.
This can cause ugly things to happen if another transaction is doing
any sort of DDL to the partition concurrently.
Upgrade that lock to ShareUpdateExclusiveLock, which per discussion
seems to be the minimum needed.
Reported by Robert Haas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYruJQ+2qnFLtF1xQtr71pdwgfxy3Ziy-TxV28M6pEmyA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a partition is detached from its parent, we acquire locks on all
attached indexes to also detach them ... but we release those locks
immediately. This is a violation of the policy of keeping locks on user
objects to the end of the transaction. Bug introduced in 8b08f7d4820f.
It's unclear that there are any ill effects possible, but it's clearly
wrong nonetheless. It's likely that bad behavior *is* possible, but
mostly because the relation that the index is for is only locked with
AccessShareLock, which is an older bug that shall be fixed separately.
While touching that line of code, close the index opened with
index_open() using index_close() instead of relation_close().
No difference in practice, but let's be consistent.
Unearthed by Robert Haas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYruJQ+2qnFLtF1xQtr71pdwgfxy3Ziy-TxV28M6pEmyA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The flag for IF NOT EXISTS was only being passed down in the normal
recursing case. It's been this way since originally added in 9.6 in
commit 2cd40adb85 so backpatch back to 9.6.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is an oversight from recent commit b13fd344. While on it, tweak
the previous test with a better name for the renamed primary key.
Detected by buildfarm member prion which forces relation cache release
with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE. Back-patch down to 9.4 as the previous
commit.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a constraint gets renamed, it may have associated with it a target
relation (for example domain constraints don't have one). Not
invalidating the target relation cache when issuing the renaming can
result in issues with subsequent commands that refer to the old
constraint name using the relation cache, causing various failures. One
pattern spotted was using CREATE TABLE LIKE after a constraint
renaming.
Reported-by: Stuart <sfbarbee@gmail.com>
Author: Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2047094.V130LYfLq4@station53.ousa.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The stanza of ExecuteTruncate[Guts] that truncates a target table's toast
relation re-used the loop local variable "rel" to reference the toast rel.
This was safe enough when written, but commit d42358efb added code below
that that supposed "rel" still pointed to the parent table. Therefore,
the stats counter update was applied to the wrong relcache entry (the
toast rel not the user rel); and if we were unlucky and that relcache
entry had been flushed during reindex_relation, very bad things could
ensue.
(I'm surprised that CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS testing hasn't found this.
I'm even more surprised that the problem wasn't detected during the
development of d42358efb; it must not have been tested in any case
with a toast table, as the incorrect stats counts are very obvious.)
To fix, replace use of "rel" in that code branch with a more local
variable. Adjust test cases added by d42358efb so that some of them
use tables with toast tables.
Per bug #15540 from Pan Bian. Back-patch to 9.5 where d42358efb came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15540-01078812338195c0@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Missing in dfa608141982.
Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f-M3NMTCpv=vDfkoqHbMPFf=3-Z1ud=+1DHH00tC+zLaQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit fixes a set of issues with ON COMMIT actions when used on
partitioned tables and tables with inheritance children:
- Applying ON COMMIT DROP on a partitioned table with partitions or on a
table with inheritance children caused a failure at commit time, with
complains about the children being already dropped as all relations are
dropped one at the same time.
- Applying ON COMMIT DELETE on a partition relying on a partitioned
table which uses ON COMMIT DROP would cause the partition truncation to
fail as the parent is removed first.
The solution to the first problem is to handle the removal of all the
dependencies in one go instead of dropping relations one-by-one, based
on a suggestion from Álvaro Herrera. So instead all the relation OIDs
to remove are gathered and then processed in one round of multiple
deletions.
The solution to the second problem is to reorder the actions, with
truncation happening first and relation drop done after. Even if it
means that a partition could be first truncated, then immediately
dropped if its partitioned table is dropped, this has the merit to keep
the code simple as there is no need to do existence checks on the
relations to drop.
Contrary to a manual TRUNCATE on a partitioned table, ON COMMIT DELETE
does not cascade to its partitions. The ON COMMIT action defined on
each partition gets the priority.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Álvaro Herrera, Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/68f17907-ec98-1192-f99f-8011400517f5@lab.ntt.co.jp
Backpatch-through: 10
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original code to propagate NOT NULL and default expressions
specified when creating a partition was mostly copy-pasted from
typed-tables creation, but not being a great match it contained some
duplicity, inefficiency and bugs.
This commit fixes the bug that NOT NULL constraints declared in the
parent table would not be honored in the partition. One reported issue
that is not fixed is that a DEFAULT declared in the child is not used
when inserting through the parent. That would amount to a behavioral
change that's better not back-patched.
This rewrite makes the code simpler:
1. instead of checking for duplicate column names in its own block,
reuse the original one that already did that;
2. instead of concatenating the list of columns from parent and the one
declared in the partition and scanning the result to (incorrectly)
propagate defaults and not-null constraints, just scan the latter
searching the former for a match, and merging sensibly. This works
because we know the list in the parent is already correct and there can
only be one parent.
This rewrite makes ColumnDef->is_from_parent unused, so it's removed
on branch master; on released branches, it's kept as an unused field in
order not to cause ABI incompatibilities.
This commit also adds a test case for creating partitions with
collations mismatching that on the parent table, something that is
closely related to the code being patched. No code change is introduced
though, since that'd be a behavior change that could break some (broken)
working applications.
Amit Langote wrote a less invasive fix for the original
NOT NULL/defaults bug, but while I kept the tests he added, I ended up
not using his original code. Ashutosh Bapat reviewed Amit's fix. Amit
reviewed mine.
Author: Álvaro Herrera, Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Langote
Reported-by: Jürgen Strobel (bug #15212)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152746742177.1291.9847032632907407358@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a partition is created as part of a trigger processing, it is
possible that the partition which just gets created changes the
properties of the table the executor of the ongoing command relies on,
causing a subsequent crash. This has been found possible when for
example using a BEFORE INSERT which creates a new partition for a
partitioned table being inserted to.
Any attempt to do so is blocked when working on a partition, with
regression tests added for both CREATE TABLE PARTITION OF and ALTER
TABLE ATTACH PARTITION.
Reported-by: Dmitry Shalashov
Author: Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15437-3fe01ee66bd1bae1@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 10
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When creating partitioned indexes, the tablespace was not being saved
for the parent index. This meant that subsequently created partitions
would not use the right tablespace for their indexes.
ALTER INDEX SET TABLESPACE and ALTER INDEX ALL IN TABLESPACE raised
errors when tried; fix them too. This requires bespoke code for
ATExecCmd() that applies to the special case when the tablespace move is
just a catalog change.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181102003138.uxpaca6qfxzskepi@alvherre.pgsql
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was no code to handle foreign key constraints on partitioned
tables in the case of ALTER TABLE DETACH; and if you happened to ATTACH
a partition that already had an equivalent constraint, that one was
ignored and a new constraint was created. Adding this to the fact that
foreign key cloning reuses the constraint name on the partition instead
of generating a new name (as it probably should, to cater to SQL
standard rules about constraint naming within schemas), the result was a
pretty poor user experience -- the most visible failure was that just
detaching a partition and re-attaching it failed with an error such as
ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pg_constraint_conrelid_contypid_conname_index"
DETAIL: Key (conrelid, contypid, conname)=(26702, 0, test_result_asset_id_fkey) already exists.
because it would try to create an identically-named constraint in the
partition. To make matters worse, if you tried to drop the constraint
in the now-independent partition, that would fail because the constraint
was still seen as dependent on the constraint in its former parent
partitioned table:
ERROR: cannot drop inherited constraint "test_result_asset_id_fkey" of relation "test_result_cbsystem_0001_0050_monthly_2018_09"
This fix attacks the problem from two angles: first, when the partition
is detached, the constraint is also marked as independent, so the drop
now works. Second, when the partition is re-attached, we scan existing
constraints searching for one matching the FK in the parent, and if one
exists, we link that one to the parent constraint. So we don't end up
with a duplicate -- and better yet, we don't need to scan the referenced
table to verify that the constraint holds.
To implement this I made a small change to previously planner-only
struct ForeignKeyCacheInfo to contain the constraint OID; also relcache
now maintains the list of FKs for partitioned tables too.
Backpatch to 11.
Reported-by: Michael Vitale (bug #15425)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15425-2dbc9d2aa999f816@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Error messages for creating a foreign key on a partitioned table using
ONLY or NOT VALID were wrong in mentioning the objects they worked on.
This commit adds on the way some regression tests missing for those
cases.
Author: Laurenz Albe
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c11c05810a9ed65e9b2c817a9ef442275a32fe80.camel@cybertec.at
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 2fbdf1b38bc changed the order in which we inserted catalog rows
when creating partitions, so that we could remove an unsightly hack
required for untimely relcache invalidations. However, that commit only
changed the ordering for CREATE TABLE PARTITION OF, and left ALTER TABLE
ATTACH PARTITION unchanged, so the latter can be affected when catalog
invalidations occur, for instance when the partition key involves an SQL
function.
Reported-by: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Author: Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6=nTz9KSfTr_6Z2mpzLJ_09JN-rK6=dWic6gGyTSWueyQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Index DDL cascading on partitioned tables introduced a way for ALTER
TABLE to be called reentrantly. This caused an an important deficiency
in event trigger support to be exposed: on exiting the reentrant call,
the alter table state object was clobbered, causing a crash when the
outer alter table tries to finalize its processing. Fix the crash by
creating a stack of event trigger state objects. There are still ways
to cause things to misbehave (and probably other crashers) with more
elaborate tricks, but at least it now doesn't crash in the obvious
scenario.
Backpatch to 9.5, where DDL deparsing of event triggers was introduced.
Reported-by: Marco Slot
Authors: Michaël Paquier, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANNhMLCpi+HQ7M36uPfGbJZEQLyTy7XvX=5EFkpR-b1bo0uJew@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is for example used when attaching a partition to a partitioned
table which includes foreign keys, and in this case the constraint name
has been missing in the data cloned. This could lead to hard crashes,
as when validating the foreign key constraint, the constraint name is
always expected. Particularly, when using log_min_messages >= DEBUG1, a
log message would be generated with this unassigned constraint name,
leading to an assertion failure on HEAD.
While on it, rename a variable in ATExecAttachPartition which was
declared twice with the same name.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181005042236.GG1629@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 11
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the column being modified is referenced by a foreign key constraint
of another table, ALTER TABLE would open the other table (to re-parse
the constraint's definition) without having first obtained a lock on it.
This was evidently intentional, but that doesn't mean it's really safe.
It's especially not safe in 9.3, which pre-dates use of MVCC scans for
catalog reads, but even in current releases it doesn't seem like a good
idea.
We know we'll need AccessExclusiveLock shortly to drop the obsoleted
constraint, so just get that a little sooner to close the hole.
Per testing with a patch that complains if we open a relation without
holding any lock on it. I don't plan to back-patch that patch, but we
should close the holes it identifies in all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2038.1538335244@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a table ownership is changed, we must apply that also to any owned
sequences. (Otherwise, it would result in a situation that cannot be
restored, because linked sequences must have the same owner as the
table.) But this was previously only applied to regular tables and
materialized views. But it should also apply to at least foreign
tables. This patch removes the relkind check altogether, because it
doesn't save very much and just introduces the possibility of similar
omissions.
Bug: #15238
Reported-by: Christoph Berg <christoph.berg@credativ.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When ALTER TABLE ... SET DATA TYPE affects a column referenced by
constraints and indexes, it drop those constraints and indexes and
recreates them afterwards, so that the definitions match the new data
type. The original code did this by dropping one object at a time
(commit 077db40fa1f3 of May 2004), which worked fine because the
dependencies between the objects were pretty straightforward, and
ordering the objects in a specific way was enough to make this work.
However, when there are foreign key constraints in partitioned tables,
the dependencies are no longer so straightforward, and we were getting
errors when attempted:
ERROR: cache lookup failed for constraint 16398
This can be fixed by doing all the drops in one pass instead, using
performMultipleDeletions (introduced by df18c51f2955 of Aug 2006). With
this change we can also remove the code to carefully order the list of
objects to be deleted.
Reported-by: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6nWS_m+s=1Udk_U9B+QY7pA-Ac58qR5BdUfOyrwnWHDew@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
Oversight in 2fbdf1b38. Per buildfarm.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the original code, we were storing the pg_inherits row for a
partitioned table too early: enough that we had a hack for relcache to
avoid falling flat on its face while reading such a partial entry. If
we finish the pg_class creation first and *then* store the pg_inherits
entry, we don't need that hack.
Also recognize that pg_class.relpartbound is not marked NOT NULL and
therefore it's entirely possible to read null values, so having only
Assert() protection isn't enough. Change those to if/elog tests
instead. This qualifies as a robustness fix, so backpatch to pg11.
In passing, remove one access that wasn't actually needed, and reword
one message to be like all the others that check for the same thing.
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180903213916.hh6wasnrdg6xv2ud@alvherre.pgsql
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's been true for a long time that we expect names of table and domain
constraints to be unique among the constraints of that table or domain.
However, the enforcement of that has been pretty haphazard, and it missed
some corner cases such as creating a CHECK constraint and then an index
constraint of the same name (as per recent report from André Hänsel).
Also, due to the lack of an actual unique index enforcing this, duplicates
could be created through race conditions.
Moreover, the code that searches pg_constraint has been quite inconsistent
about how to handle duplicate names if one did occur: some places checked
and threw errors if there was more than one match, while others just
processed the first match they came to.
To fix, create a unique index on (conrelid, contypid, conname). Since
either conrelid or contypid is zero, this will separately enforce
uniqueness of constraint names among constraints of any one table and any
one domain. (If we ever implement SQL assertions, and put them into this
catalog, more thought might be needed. But it'd be at least as reasonable
to put them into a new catalog; having overloaded this one catalog with
two kinds of constraints was a mistake already IMO.) This index can replace
the existing non-unique index on conrelid, though we need to keep the one
on contypid for query performance reasons.
Having done that, we can simplify the logic in various places that either
coped with duplicates or neglected to, as well as potentially improve
lookup performance when searching for a constraint by name.
Also, as per our usual practice, install a preliminary check so that you
get something more friendly than a unique-index violation report in the
case complained of by André. And teach ChooseIndexName to avoid choosing
autogenerated names that would draw such a failure.
While it's not possible to make such a change in the back branches,
it doesn't seem quite too late to put this into v11, so do so.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0c1001d4428f$0942b430$1bc81c90$@webkr.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's a project policy against using plain "char buf[BLCKSZ]" local
or static variables as page buffers; preferred style is to palloc or
malloc each buffer to ensure it is MAXALIGN'd. However, that policy's
been ignored in an increasing number of places. We've apparently got
away with it so far, probably because (a) relatively few people use
platforms on which misalignment causes core dumps and/or (b) the
variables chance to be sufficiently aligned anyway. But this is not
something to rely on. Moreover, even if we don't get a core dump,
we might be paying a lot of cycles for misaligned accesses.
To fix, invent new union types PGAlignedBlock and PGAlignedXLogBlock
that the compiler must allocate with sufficient alignment, and use
those in place of plain char arrays.
I used these types even for variables where there's no risk of a
misaligned access, since ensuring proper alignment should make
kernel data transfers faster. I also changed some places where
we had been palloc'ing short-lived buffers, for coding style
uniformity and to save palloc/pfree overhead.
Since this seems to be a live portability hazard (despite the lack
of field reports), back-patch to all supported versions.
Patch by me; thanks to Michael Paquier for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1535618100.1286.3.camel@credativ.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While monitoring the code, a couple of issues related to string
translation has showed up:
- Some routines for auto-updatable views return an error string, which
sometimes missed the shot. A comment regarding string translation is
added for each routine to help with future features.
- GSSAPI authentication missed two translations.
- vacuumdb handles non-translated strings.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180810.152131.31921918.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Backpatch-through: 9.3
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The sequence name is no longer stored in the sequence relation, since
1753b1b027035029c2a2a1649065762fafbf63f3.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
transformPartitionSpec rejected duplicate simple partition columns
(e.g., "PARTITION BY RANGE (x,x)") but paid no attention to expression
columns, resulting in inconsistent behavior. Worse, cases like
"PARTITION BY RANGE (x,(x))") were accepted but would then result in
dump/reload failures, since the expression (x) would get simplified
to a plain column later.
There seems no better reason for this restriction than there was for
the one against duplicate included index columns (cf commit 701fd0bbc),
so let's just remove it.
Back-patch to v10 where this code was added.
Report and patch by Yugo Nagata.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180712165939.36b12aff.nagata@sraoss.co.jp
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The existing error message was complaining that the column is not an
expression, which is not correct. Introduce a suitable wording
variation and a test.
Co-authored-by: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180628182803.e4632d5a.nagata@sraoss.co.jp
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When truncating a table that is referenced by foreign keys in
partitioned tables, the check to ensure the referencing table are also
truncated spuriously failed. This is because it was relying on
relhastriggers as a proxy for the table having FKs, and that's wrong for
partitioned tables. Fix it to consider such tables separately. There
may be a better way ... but this code is pretty inefficient already.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquiër <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180711000624.zmeizicibxeehhsg@alvherre.pgsql
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since their introduction, partition trees have been a bit lossy
regarding temporary relations. Inheritance trees respect the following
patterns:
1) a child relation can be temporary if the parent is permanent.
2) a child relation can be temporary if the parent is temporary.
3) a child relation cannot be permanent if the parent is temporary.
4) The use of temporary relations also imply that when both parent and
child need to be from the same sessions.
Partitions share many similar patterns with inheritance, however the
handling of the partition bounds make the situation a bit tricky for
case 1) as the partition code bases a lot of its lookup code upon
PartitionDesc which does not really look after relpersistence. This
causes for example a temporary partition created by session A to be
visible by another session B, preventing this session B to create an
extra partition which overlaps with the temporary one created by A with
a non-intuitive error message. There could be use-cases where mixing
permanent partitioned tables with temporary partitions make sense, but
that would be a new feature. Partitions respect 2), 3) and 4) already.
It is a bit depressing to see those error checks happening in
MergeAttributes() whose purpose is different, but that's left as future
refactoring work.
Back-patch down to 10, which is where partitioning has been introduced,
except that default partitions do not apply there. Documentation also
includes limitations related to the use of temporary tables with
partition trees.
Reported-by: David Rowley
Author: Amit Langote, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Langote, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f94Ojk0og9GMkRHGt8wHTW=ijq5KzJKuoBoqWLwSVwGmw@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
"compute_hash_value" is particularly gratuitously generic, but IMO
all of these ought to have names clearly related to partitioning.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It might be impossible for this to cause a problem in non-debug builds,
since there'd be no opportunity for the relcache entry to get recycled
before the fetch. It blows up nicely with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE plus
valgrind, though.
Evidently introduced by careless refactoring in commit f0e44751d.
Back-patch accordingly.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/27543.1528758304@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
| |
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15719.1523984266@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lifetime of the input string is not right, so create a separate copy.
Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a2773420-50d1-0a42-3396-fe42b0921134@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's been a massive addition of partitioning code in PostgreSQL 11,
with little oversight on its placement, resulting in a
catalog/partition.c with poorly defined boundaries and responsibilities.
This commit tries to set a couple of distinct modules to separate things
a little bit. There are no code changes here, only code movement.
There are three new files:
src/backend/utils/cache/partcache.c
src/include/partitioning/partdefs.h
src/include/utils/partcache.h
The previous arrangement of #including catalog/partition.h almost
everywhere is no more.
Authors: Amit Langote and Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/98e8d509-790a-128c-be7f-e48a5b2d8d97@lab.ntt.co.jp
https://postgr.es/m/11aa0c50-316b-18bb-722d-c23814f39059@lab.ntt.co.jp
https://postgr.es/m/143ed9a4-6038-76d4-9a55-502035815e68@lab.ntt.co.jp
https://postgr.es/m/20180413193503.nynq7bnmgh6vs5vm@alvherre.pgsql
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I lowered the lock level for partitions being scanned from
AccessExclusive to ShareLock in the course of 72cf7f310c07, but that was
bogus, as pointed out by Robert Haas. Revert that bit. Doing this is
possible, but requires more work.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobV7Nfmqv+TZXcdSsb9Bjc-OL-Anv6BNmCbfJVZLYPE4Q@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Oversight in commit 8b08f7d4820f: pg_class.relispartition was not
being set for index partitions, which is a bit odd, and was also causing
the code to unnecessarily call has_superclass() when simply checking the
flag was enough.
Author: Álvaro Herrera
Reported-by: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12085bc4-0bc6-0f3a-4c43-57fe0681772b@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the table being attached contained values that contradict the default
partition's partition constraint, it would fail to complain, because
CommandCounterIncrement changes in 4dba331cb3dc coupled with some bogus
coding in the existing ValidatePartitionConstraints prevented the
partition constraint from being validated after all -- or rather, it
caused to constraint to become an empty one, always succeeding.
Fix by not re-reading the OID of the default partition in
ATExecAttachPartition. To forestall similar problems, revise the
existing code:
* rename routine from ValidatePartitionConstraints() to
QueuePartitionConstraintValidation, to better represent what it
actually does.
* add an Assert() to make sure that when queueing a constraint for a
partition we're not overwriting a constraint previously queued.
* add an Assert() that we don't try to invoke the special-purpose
validation of the default partition when attaching the default
partition itself.
While at it, change some loops to obtain partition OIDs from
partdesc->oids rather than find_all_inheritors; reduce the lock level
of partitions being scanned from AccessExclusiveLock to ShareLock;
rewrite QueuePartitionConstraintValidation in a recursive fashion rather
than repetitive.
Author: Álvaro Herrera. Tests written by Amit Langote
Reported-by: Rushabh Lathia
Diagnosed-by: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI, who also provided the initial fix.
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI, Amit Langote, Jeevan Ladhe
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf0W+v-Ci_qNV_5R3A=Z9LsK4+jO7LzgddRncpp_rrnJqQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Traditionally, include/catalog/pg_foo.h contains extern declarations
for functions in backend/catalog/pg_foo.c, in addition to its function
as the authoritative definition of the pg_foo catalog's rowtype.
In some cases, we'd been forced to split out those extern declarations
into separate pg_foo_fn.h headers so that the catalog definitions
could be #include'd by frontend code. That problem is gone as of
commit 9c0a0de4c, so let's undo the splits to make things less
confusing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/23690.1523031777@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch introduces INCLUDE clause to index definition. This clause
specifies a list of columns which will be included as a non-key part in
the index. The INCLUDE columns exist solely to allow more queries to
benefit from index-only scans. Also, such columns don't need to have
appropriate operator classes. Expressions are not supported as INCLUDE
columns since they cannot be used in index-only scans.
Index access methods supporting INCLUDE are indicated by amcaninclude flag
in IndexAmRoutine. For now, only B-tree indexes support INCLUDE clause.
In B-tree indexes INCLUDE columns are truncated from pivot index tuples
(tuples located in non-leaf pages and high keys). Therefore, B-tree indexes
now might have variable number of attributes. This patch also provides
generic facility to support that: pivot tuples contain number of their
attributes in t_tid.ip_posid. Free 13th bit of t_info is used for indicating
that. This facility will simplify further support of index suffix truncation.
The changes of above are backward-compatible, pg_upgrade doesn't need special
handling of B-tree indexes for that.
Bump catalog version
Author: Anastasia Lubennikova with contribition by Alexander Korotkov and me
Reviewed by: Peter Geoghegan, Tomas Vondra, Antonin Houska, Jeff Janes,
David Rowley, Alexander Korotkov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/56168952.4010101@postgrespro.ru
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a new WAL record type for TRUNCATE, which is only used when
wal_level >= logical. (For physical replication, TRUNCATE is already
replicated via SMGR records.) Add new callback for logical decoding
output plugins to receive TRUNCATE actions.
Author: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Author: Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@2ndquadrant.it>
Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171231194359.cvojcour423ulha4@alvherre.pgsql
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut
|
