aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/optimizer/path/pathkeys.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Revert CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING ...Teodor Sigaev2016-04-08
| | | | | | It's not ready yet, revert two commits 690c543550b0d2852060c18d270cdb534d339d9a - unstable test output 386e3d7609c49505e079c40c65919d99feb82505 - patch itself
* CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING (column[, ...])Teodor Sigaev2016-04-08
| | | | | | | | | | Now indexes (but only B-tree for now) can contain "extra" column(s) which doesn't participate in index structure, they are just stored in leaf tuples. It allows to use index only scan by using single index instead of two or more indexes. Author: Anastasia Lubennikova with minor editorializing by me Reviewers: David Rowley, Peter Geoghegan, Jeff Janes
* Make the upper part of the planner work by generating and comparing Paths.Tom Lane2016-03-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I've been saying we needed to do this for more than five years, and here it finally is. This patch removes the ever-growing tangle of spaghetti logic that grouping_planner() used to use to try to identify the best plan for post-scan/join query steps. Now, there is (nearly) independent consideration of each execution step, and entirely separate construction of Paths to represent each of the possible ways to do that step. We choose the best Path or set of Paths using the same add_path() logic that's been used inside query_planner() for years. In addition, this patch removes the old restriction that subquery_planner() could return only a single Plan. It now returns a RelOptInfo containing a set of Paths, just as query_planner() does, and the parent query level can use each of those Paths as the basis of a SubqueryScanPath at its level. This allows finding some optimizations that we missed before, wherein a subquery was capable of returning presorted data and thereby avoiding a sort in the parent level, making the overall cost cheaper even though delivering sorted output was not the cheapest plan for the subquery in isolation. (A couple of regression test outputs change in consequence of that. However, there is very little change in visible planner behavior overall, because the point of this patch is not to get immediate planning benefits but to create the infrastructure for future improvements.) There is a great deal left to do here. This patch unblocks a lot of planner work that was basically impractical in the old code structure, such as allowing FDWs to implement remote aggregation, or rewriting plan_set_operations() to allow consideration of multiple implementation orders for set operations. (The latter will likely require a full rewrite of plan_set_operations(); what I've done here is only to fix it to return Paths not Plans.) I have also left unfinished some localized refactoring in createplan.c and planner.c, because it was not necessary to get this patch to a working state. Thanks to Robert Haas, David Rowley, and Amit Kapila for review.
* Update copyright for 2016Bruce Momjian2016-01-02
| | | | Backpatch certain files through 9.1
* postgres_fdw: Consider requesting sorted data so we can do a merge join.Robert Haas2015-12-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When use_remote_estimate is enabled, consider adding ORDER BY to the query we sending to the remote server so that we can use that ordered data for a merge join. Commit f18c944b6137329ac4a6b2dce5745c5dc21a8578 arranges to push down the query pathkeys, which seems like the case mostly likely to be a win, but testing shows this can sometimes win, too. For a regular table, we know which indexes are present and therefore test whether the ordering provided by each such index is useful. Here, we take the opposite approach: guess what orderings would be useful if they could be generated cheaply, and then ask the remote side what those will cost. Ashutosh Bapat, with very substantial cosmetic revisions by me. Also reviewed by Rushabh Lathia.
* Fix eclass_useful_for_merging to give valid results for appendrel children.Tom Lane2015-08-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Formerly, this function would always return "true" for an appendrel child relation, because it would think that the appendrel parent was a potential join target for the child. In principle that should only lead to some inefficiency in planning, but fuzz testing by Andreas Seltenreich disclosed that it could lead to "could not find pathkey item to sort" planner errors in odd corner cases. Specifically, we would think that all columns of a child table's multicolumn index were interesting pathkeys, causing us to generate a MergeAppend path that sorts by all the columns. However, if any of those columns weren't actually used above the level of the appendrel, they would not get added to that rel's targetlist, which would result in being unable to resolve the MergeAppend's sort keys against its targetlist during createplan.c. Backpatch to 9.3. In older versions, columns of an appendrel get added to its targetlist even if they're not mentioned above the scan level, so that the failure doesn't occur. It might be worth back-patching this fix to older versions anyway, but I'll refrain for the moment.
* Move strategy numbers to include/access/stratnum.hAlvaro Herrera2015-05-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For upcoming BRIN opclasses, it's convenient to have strategy numbers defined in a single place. Since there's nothing appropriate, create it. The StrategyNumber typedef now lives there, as well as existing strategy numbers for B-trees (from skey.h) and R-tree-and-friends (from gist.h). skey.h is forced to include stratnum.h because of the StrategyNumber typedef, but gist.h is not; extensions that currently rely on gist.h for rtree strategy numbers might need to add a new A few .c files can stop including skey.h and/or gist.h, which is a nice side benefit. Per discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150514232132.GZ2523@alvh.no-ip.org Authored by Emre Hasegeli and Álvaro. (It's not clear to me why bootscanner.l has any #include lines at all.)
* Update copyright for 2015Bruce Momjian2015-01-06
| | | | Backpatch certain files through 9.0
* pgindent run for 9.4Bruce Momjian2014-05-06
| | | | | This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.
* Update copyright for 2014Bruce Momjian2014-01-07
| | | | | Update all files in head, and files COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml in all back branches.
* Support multi-argument UNNEST(), and TABLE() syntax for multiple functions.Tom Lane2013-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds the ability to write TABLE( function1(), function2(), ...) as a single FROM-clause entry. The result is the concatenation of the first row from each function, followed by the second row from each function, etc; with NULLs inserted if any function produces fewer rows than others. This is believed to be a much more useful behavior than what Postgres currently does with multiple SRFs in a SELECT list. This syntax also provides a reasonable way to combine use of column definition lists with WITH ORDINALITY: put the column definition list inside TABLE(), where it's clear that it doesn't control the ordinality column as well. Also implement SQL-compliant multiple-argument UNNEST(), by turning UNNEST(a,b,c) into TABLE(unnest(a), unnest(b), unnest(c)). The SQL standard specifies TABLE() with only a single function, not multiple functions, and it seems to require an implicit UNNEST() which is not what this patch does. There may be something wrong with that reading of the spec, though, because if it's right then the spec's TABLE() is just a pointless alternative spelling of UNNEST(). After further review of that, we might choose to adopt a different syntax for what this patch does, but in any case this functionality seems clearly worthwhile. Andrew Gierth, reviewed by Zoltán Böszörményi and Heikki Linnakangas, and significantly revised by me
* Compute correct em_nullable_relids in get_eclass_for_sort_expr().Tom Lane2013-11-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Bug #8591 from Claudio Freire demonstrates that get_eclass_for_sort_expr must be able to compute valid em_nullable_relids for any new equivalence class members it creates. I'd worried about this in the commit message for db9f0e1d9a4a0842c814a464cdc9758c3f20b96c, but claimed that it wasn't a problem because multi-member ECs should already exist when it runs. That is transparently wrong, though, because this function is also called by initialize_mergeclause_eclasses, which runs during deconstruct_jointree. The example given in the bug report (which the new regression test item is based upon) fails because the COALESCE() expression is first seen by initialize_mergeclause_eclasses rather than process_equivalence. Fixing this requires passing the appropriate nullable_relids set to get_eclass_for_sort_expr, and it requires new code to compute that set for top-level expressions such as ORDER BY, GROUP BY, etc. We store the top-level nullable_relids in a new field in PlannerInfo to avoid computing it many times. In the back branches, I've added the new field at the end of the struct to minimize ABI breakage for planner plugins. There doesn't seem to be a good alternative to changing get_eclass_for_sort_expr's API signature, though. There probably aren't any third-party extensions calling that function directly; moreover, if there are, they probably need to think about what to pass for nullable_relids anyway. Back-patch to 9.2, like the previous patch in this area.
* Postpone creation of pathkeys lists to fix bug #8049.Tom Lane2013-04-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch gets rid of the concept of, and infrastructure for, non-canonical PathKeys; we now only ever create canonical pathkey lists. The need for non-canonical pathkeys came from the desire to have grouping_planner initialize query_pathkeys and related pathkey lists before calling query_planner. However, since query_planner didn't actually *do* anything with those lists before they'd been made canonical, we can get rid of the whole mess by just not creating the lists at all until the point where we formerly canonicalized them. There are several ways in which we could implement that without making query_planner itself deal with grouping/sorting features (which are supposed to be the province of grouping_planner). I chose to add a callback function to query_planner's API; other alternatives would have required adding more fields to PlannerInfo, which while not bad in itself would create an ABI break for planner-related plugins in the 9.2 release series. This still breaks ABI for anything that calls query_planner directly, but it seems somewhat unlikely that there are any such plugins. I had originally conceived of this change as merely a step on the way to fixing bug #8049 from Teun Hoogendoorn; but it turns out that this fixes that bug all by itself, as per the added regression test. The reason is that now get_eclass_for_sort_expr is adding the ORDER BY expression at the end of EquivalenceClass creation not the start, and so anything that is in a multi-member EquivalenceClass has already been created with correct em_nullable_relids. I am suspicious that there are related scenarios in which we still need to teach get_eclass_for_sort_expr to compute correct nullable_relids, but am not eager to risk destabilizing either 9.2 or 9.3 to fix bugs that are only hypothetical. So for the moment, do this and stop here. Back-patch to 9.2 but not to earlier branches, since they don't exhibit this bug for lack of join-clause-movement logic that depends on em_nullable_relids being correct. (We might have to revisit that choice if any related bugs turn up.) In 9.2, don't change the signature of make_pathkeys_for_sortclauses nor remove canonicalize_pathkeys, so as not to risk more plugin breakage than we have to.
* Update copyrights for 2013Bruce Momjian2013-01-01
| | | | | Fully update git head, and update back branches in ./COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml files.
* Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3Bruce Momjian2012-06-10
| | | | commit-fest.
* Revise parameterized-path mechanism to fix assorted issues.Tom Lane2012-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adjusts the treatment of parameterized paths so that all paths with the same parameterization (same set of required outer rels) for the same relation will have the same rowcount estimate. We cache the rowcount estimates to ensure that property, and hopefully save a few cycles too. Doing this makes it practical for add_path_precheck to operate without a rowcount estimate: it need only assume that paths with different parameterizations never dominate each other, which is close enough to true anyway for coarse filtering, because normally a more-parameterized path should yield fewer rows thanks to having more join clauses to apply. In add_path, we do the full nine yards of comparing rowcount estimates along with everything else, so that we can discard parameterized paths that don't actually have an advantage. This fixes some issues I'd found with add_path rejecting parameterized paths on the grounds that they were more expensive than not-parameterized ones, even though they yielded many fewer rows and hence would be cheaper once subsequent joining was considered. To make the same-rowcounts assumption valid, we have to require that any parameterized path enforce *all* join clauses that could be obtained from the particular set of outer rels, even if not all of them are useful for indexing. This is required at both base scans and joins. It's a good thing anyway since the net impact is that join quals are checked at the lowest practical level in the join tree. Hence, discard the original rather ad-hoc mechanism for choosing parameterization joinquals, and build a better one that has a more principled rule for when clauses can be moved. The original rule was actually buggy anyway for lack of knowledge about which relations are part of an outer join's outer side; getting this right requires adding an outer_relids field to RestrictInfo.
* Revisit handling of UNION ALL subqueries with non-Var output columns.Tom Lane2012-03-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In commit 57664ed25e5dea117158a2e663c29e60b3546e1c I tried to fix a bug reported by Teodor Sigaev by making non-simple-Var output columns distinct (by wrapping their expressions with dummy PlaceHolderVar nodes). This did not work too well. Commit b28ffd0fcc583c1811e5295279e7d4366c3cae6c fixed some ensuing problems with matching to child indexes, but per a recent report from Claus Stadler, constraint exclusion of UNION ALL subqueries was still broken, because constant-simplification didn't handle the injected PlaceHolderVars well either. On reflection, the original patch was quite misguided: there is no reason to expect that EquivalenceClass child members will be distinct. So instead of trying to make them so, we should ensure that we can cope with the situation when they're not. Accordingly, this patch reverts the code changes in the above-mentioned commits (though the regression test cases they added stay). Instead, I've added assorted defenses to make sure that duplicate EC child members don't cause any problems. Teodor's original problem ("MergeAppend child's targetlist doesn't match MergeAppend") is addressed more directly by revising prepare_sort_from_pathkeys to let the parent MergeAppend's sort list guide creation of each child's sort list. In passing, get rid of add_sort_column; as far as I can tell, testing for duplicate sort keys at this stage is dead code. Certainly it doesn't trigger often enough to be worth expending cycles on in ordinary queries. And keeping the test would've greatly complicated the new logic in prepare_sort_from_pathkeys, because comparing pathkey list entries against a previous output array requires that we not skip any entries in the list. Back-patch to 9.1, like the previous patches. The only known issue in this area that wasn't caused by the ill-advised previous patches was the MergeAppend planning failure, which of course is not relevant before 9.1. It's possible that we need some of the new defenses against duplicate child EC entries in older branches, but until there's some clear evidence of that I'm going to refrain from back-patching further.
* Use parameterized paths to generate inner indexscans more flexibly.Tom Lane2012-01-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch fixes the planner so that it can generate nestloop-with- inner-indexscan plans even with one or more levels of joining between the indexscan and the nestloop join that is supplying the parameter. The executor was fixed to handle such cases some time ago, but the planner was not ready. This should improve our plans in many situations where join ordering restrictions formerly forced complete table scans. There is probably a fair amount of tuning work yet to be done, because of various heuristics that have been added to limit the number of parameterized paths considered. However, we are not going to find out what needs to be adjusted until the code gets some real-world use, so it's time to get it in there where it can be tested easily. Note API change for index AM amcostestimate functions. I'm not aware of any non-core index AMs, but if there are any, they will need minor adjustments.
* Update copyright notices for year 2012.Bruce Momjian2012-01-01
|
* Rearrange the implementation of index-only scans.Tom Lane2011-10-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit changes index-only scans so that data is read directly from the index tuple without first generating a faux heap tuple. The only immediate benefit is that indexes on system columns (such as OID) can be used in index-only scans, but this is necessary infrastructure if we are ever to support index-only scans on expression indexes. The executor is now ready for that, though the planner still needs substantial work to recognize the possibility. To do this, Vars in index-only plan nodes have to refer to index columns not heap columns. I introduced a new special varno, INDEX_VAR, to mark such Vars to avoid confusion. (In passing, this commit renames the two existing special varnos to OUTER_VAR and INNER_VAR.) This allows ruleutils.c to handle them with logic similar to what we use for subplan reference Vars. Since index-only scans are now fundamentally different from regular indexscans so far as their expression subtrees are concerned, I also chose to change them to have their own plan node type (and hence, their own executor source file).
* pgindent run before PG 9.1 beta 1.Bruce Momjian2011-04-10
|
* Clean up a few failures to set collation fields in expression nodes.Tom Lane2011-03-26
| | | | | | | | | I'm not sure these have any non-cosmetic implications, but I'm not sure they don't, either. In particular, ensure the CaseTestExpr generated by transformAssignmentIndirection to represent the base target column carries the correct collation, because parse_collate.c won't fix that. Tweak lsyscache.c API so that we can get the appropriate collation without an extra syscache lookup.
* Reimplement planner's handling of MIN/MAX aggregate optimization (again).Tom Lane2011-03-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Instead of playing cute games with pathkeys, just build a direct representation of the intended sub-select, and feed it through query_planner to get a Path for the index access. This is a bit slower than 9.1's previous method, since we'll duplicate most of the overhead of query_planner; but since the whole optimization only applies to rather simple single-table queries, that probably won't be much of a problem in practice. The advantage is that we get to do the right thing when there's a partial index that needs the implicit IS NOT NULL clause to be usable. Also, although this makes planagg.c be a bit more closely tied to the ordering of operations in grouping_planner, we can get rid of some coupling to lower-level parts of the planner. Per complaint from Marti Raudsepp.
* Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.Tom Lane2011-03-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All expression nodes now have an explicit output-collation field, unless they are known to only return a noncollatable data type (such as boolean or record). Also, nodes that can invoke collation-aware functions store a separate field that is the collation value to pass to the function. This avoids confusion that arises when a function has collatable inputs and noncollatable output type, or vice versa. Also, replace the parser's on-the-fly collation assignment method with a post-pass over the completed expression tree. This allows us to use a more complex (and hopefully more nearly spec-compliant) assignment rule without paying for it in extra storage in every expression node. Fix assorted bugs in the planner's handling of collations by making collation one of the defining properties of an EquivalenceClass and by converting CollateExprs into discardable RelabelType nodes during expression preprocessing.
* Per-column collation supportPeter Eisentraut2011-02-08
| | | | | | | | This adds collation support for columns and domains, a COLLATE clause to override it per expression, and B-tree index support. Peter Eisentraut reviewed by Pavel Stehule, Itagaki Takahiro, Robert Haas, Noah Misch
* Stamp copyrights for year 2011.Bruce Momjian2011-01-01
|
* Simplify and speed up mapping of index opfamilies to pathkeys.Tom Lane2010-11-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Formerly we looked up the operators associated with each index (caching them in relcache) and then the planner looked up the btree opfamily containing such operators in order to build the btree-centric pathkey representation that describes the index's sort order. This is quite pointless for btree indexes: we might as well just use the index's opfamily information directly. That saves syscache lookup cycles during planning, and furthermore allows us to eliminate the relcache's caching of operators altogether, which may help in reducing backend startup time. I added code to plancat.c to perform the same type of double lookup on-the-fly if it's ever faced with a non-btree amcanorder index AM. If such a thing actually becomes interesting for production, we should replace that logic with some more-direct method for identifying the corresponding btree opfamily; but it's not worth spending effort on now. There is considerably more to do pursuant to my recent proposal to get rid of sort-operator-based representations of sort orderings, but this patch grabs some of the low-hanging fruit. I'll look at the remainder of that work after the current commitfest.
* Reimplement planner's handling of MIN/MAX aggregate optimization.Tom Lane2010-11-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Per my recent proposal, get rid of all the direct inspection of indexes and manual generation of paths in planagg.c. Instead, set up EquivalenceClasses for the aggregate argument expressions, and let the regular path generation logic deal with creating paths that can satisfy those sort orders. This makes planagg.c a bit more visible to the rest of the planner than it was originally, but the approach is basically a lot cleaner than before. A major advantage of doing it this way is that we get MIN/MAX optimization on inheritance trees (using MergeAppend of indexscans) practically for free, whereas in the old way we'd have had to add a whole lot more duplicative logic. One small disadvantage of this approach is that MIN/MAX aggregates can no longer exploit partial indexes having an "x IS NOT NULL" predicate, unless that restriction or something that implies it is specified in the query. The previous implementation was able to use the added "x IS NOT NULL" condition as an extra predicate proof condition, but in this version we rely entirely on indexes that are considered usable by the main planning process. That seems a fair tradeoff for the simplicity and functionality gained.
* Avoid creation of useless EquivalenceClasses during planning.Tom Lane2010-10-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Zoltan Boszormenyi exhibited a test case in which planning time was dominated by construction of EquivalenceClasses and PathKeys that had no actual relevance to the query (and in fact got discarded immediately). This happened because we generated PathKeys describing the sort ordering of every index on every table in the query, and only after that checked to see if the sort ordering was relevant. The EC/PK construction code is O(N^2) in the number of ECs, which is all right for the intended number of such objects, but it gets out of hand if there are ECs for lots of irrelevant indexes. To fix, twiddle the handling of mergeclauses a little bit to ensure that every interesting EC is created before we begin path generation. (This doesn't cost anything --- in fact I think it's a bit cheaper than before --- since we always eventually created those ECs anyway.) Then, if an index column can't be found in any pre-existing EC, we know that that sort ordering is irrelevant for the query. Instead of creating a useless EC, we can just not build a pathkey for the index column in the first place. The index will still be considered if it's useful for non-order-related reasons, but we will think of its output as unsorted.
* Remove cvs keywords from all files.Magnus Hagander2010-09-20
|
* Small refactoring of makeVar() from a TargetEntryPeter Eisentraut2010-08-27
|
* pgindent run for 9.0Bruce Momjian2010-02-26
|
* Update copyright for the year 2010.Bruce Momjian2010-01-02
|
* Fix assertion failure when a SELECT DISTINCT ON expression is volatile.Tom Lane2009-09-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | In this case we generate two PathKey references to the expression (one for DISTINCT and one for ORDER BY) and they really need to refer to the same EquivalenceClass. However get_eclass_for_sort_expr was being overly paranoid and creating two different EC's. Correct behavior is to use the SortGroupRef index to decide whether two references to volatile expressions that are equal() (ie textually equivalent) should be considered the same. Backpatch to 8.4. Possibly this should be changed in 8.3 as well, but I'll refrain in the absence of evidence of a visible failure in that branch. Per bug #5049.
* Repair bug #4926 "too few pathkeys for mergeclauses". This example showsTom Lane2009-07-17
| | | | | | | | | that the sanity checking I added to create_mergejoin_plan() in 8.3 was a few bricks shy of a load: the mergeclauses could reference pathkeys in a noncanonical order such as x,y,x, not only cases like x,x,y which is all that the code had allowed for. The odd cases only turn up when using redundant clauses in an outer join condition, which is why no one had noticed before.
* Shave a few cycles in compare_pathkeys() by checking for pointer-identicalTom Lane2009-02-28
| | | | | | input lists before we grovel through the lists. This doesn't save much, but testing shows that the case of both inputs NIL is common enough that it saves something. And this is used enough to be a hotspot.
* Update copyright for 2009.Bruce Momjian2009-01-01
|
* Move exprType(), exprTypmod(), expression_tree_walker(), and related routinesTom Lane2008-08-25
| | | | | | into nodes/nodeFuncs, so as to reduce wanton cross-subsystem #includes inside the backend. There's probably more that should be done along this line, but this is a start anyway.
* Rearrange the querytree representation of ORDER BY/GROUP BY/DISTINCT itemsTom Lane2008-08-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | as per my recent proposal: 1. Fold SortClause and GroupClause into a single node type SortGroupClause. We were already relying on them to be struct-equivalent, so using two node tags wasn't accomplishing much except to get in the way of comparing items with equal(). 2. Add an "eqop" field to SortGroupClause to carry the associated equality operator. This is cheap for the parser to get at the same time it's looking up the sort operator, and storing it eliminates the need for repeated not-so-cheap lookups during planning. In future this will also let us represent GROUP/DISTINCT operations on datatypes that have hash opclasses but no btree opclasses (ie, they have equality but no natural sort order). The previous representation simply didn't work for that, since its only indicator of comparison semantics was a sort operator. 3. Add a hasDistinctOn boolean to struct Query to explicitly record whether the distinctClause came from DISTINCT or DISTINCT ON. This allows removing some complicated and not 100% bulletproof code that attempted to figure that out from the distinctClause alone. This patch doesn't in itself create any new capability, but it's necessary infrastructure for future attempts to use hash-based grouping for DISTINCT and UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT.
* Fix some planner issues found while investigating Kevin Grittner's reportTom Lane2008-01-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | of poorer planning in 8.3 than 8.2: 1. After pushing a constant across an outer join --- ie, given "a LEFT JOIN b ON (a.x = b.y) WHERE a.x = 42", we can deduce that b.y is sort of equal to 42, in the sense that we needn't fetch any b rows where it isn't 42 --- loop to see if any additional deductions can be made. Previous releases did that by recursing, but I had mistakenly thought that this was no longer necessary given the EquivalenceClass machinery. 2. Allow pushing constants across outer join conditions even if the condition is outerjoin_delayed due to a lower outer join. This is safe as long as the condition is strict and we re-test it at the upper join. 3. Keep the outer-join clause even if we successfully push a constant across it. This is *necessary* in the outerjoin_delayed case, but even in the simple case, it seems better to do this to ensure that the join search order heuristics will consider the join as reasonable to make. Mark such a clause as having selectivity 1.0, though, since it's not going to eliminate very many rows after application of the constant condition. 4. Tweak have_relevant_eclass_joinclause to report that two relations are joinable when they have vars that are equated to the same constant. We won't actually generate any joinclause from such an EquivalenceClass, but again it seems that in such a case it's a good idea to consider the join as worth costing out. 5. Fix a bug in select_mergejoin_clauses that was exposed by these changes: we have to reject candidate mergejoin clauses if either side was equated to a constant, because we can't construct a canonical pathkey list for such a clause. This is an implementation restriction that might be worth fixing someday, but it doesn't seem critical to get it done for 8.3.
* Update copyrights in source tree to 2008.Bruce Momjian2008-01-01
|
* Re-run pgindent with updated list of typedefs. (Updated README shouldBruce Momjian2007-11-15
| | | | avoid this problem in the future.)
* pgindent run for 8.3.Bruce Momjian2007-11-15
|
* Fix EquivalenceClass code to handle volatile sort expressions in a moreTom Lane2007-11-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | predictable manner; in particular that if you say ORDER BY output-column-ref, it will in fact sort by that specific column even if there are multiple syntactic matches. An example is SELECT random() AS a, random() AS b FROM ... ORDER BY b, a; While the use-case for this might be a bit debatable, it worked as expected in earlier releases, so we should preserve the behavior for 8.3. Per my recent proposal. While at it, fix convert_subquery_pathkeys() to handle RelabelType stripping in both directions; it needs this for the same reasons make_sort_from_pathkeys does.
* Last week's patch for make_sort_from_pathkeys wasn't good enough: it hasTom Lane2007-11-08
| | | | | | | to be able to discard top-level RelabelType nodes on *both* sides of the equivalence-class-to-target-list comparison, since make_pathkey_from_sortinfo might either add or remove a RelabelType. Also fix the latter to do the removal case cleanly. Per example from Peter.
* Ensure that EquivalenceClasses generated from ORDER BY keys contain properTom Lane2007-11-02
| | | | | | | | | RelabelType nodes when the sort key is binary-compatible with the sort operator rather than having exactly its input type. We did this correctly for index columns but not sort keys, leading to failure to notice that a varchar index matches an ORDER BY request. This requires a bit more work in make_sort_from_pathkeys, but not anyplace else that I can find. Per bug report and subsequent discussion.
* Avoid considering both sort directions as equally useful for merging.Tom Lane2007-10-27
| | | | | | | | | This doubles the planning workload for mergejoins while not actually accomplishing much. The only useful case is where one of the directions matches the query's ORDER BY request; therefore, put a thumb on the scales in that direction, and otherwise arbitrarily consider only the ASC direction. (This is a lot easier now than it would've been before 8.3, since we have more semantic knowledge embedded in PathKeys now.)
* Change build_index_pathkeys() so that the expressions it builds to representTom Lane2007-05-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | index key columns always have the type expected by the index's associated operators, ie, we add RelabelType nodes when dealing with binary-compatible index opclasses. This is needed to get varchar indexes to play nicely with the new EquivalenceClass machinery, as per recent gripe from Josh Berkus that CVS HEAD was failing to match a varchar index column to a constant restriction in the query. It seems likely that this change will allow removal of a lot of ugly ad-hoc RelabelType-stripping that the planner has traditionally done while matching expressions to other expressions, but I'll worry about that some other day.
* Avoid running build_index_pathkeys() in situations where there cannotTom Lane2007-04-15
| | | | | | | possibly be any useful pathkeys --- to wit, queries with neither any join clauses nor any ORDER BY request. It's nearly free to check for this case and it saves a useful fraction of the planning time for simple queries.
* Refactor some lsyscache routines to eliminate duplicate code and saveTom Lane2007-01-21
| | | | a couple of syscache lookups in make_pathkey_from_sortinfo().