aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/parser
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Clone extended stats in CREATE TABLE (LIKE INCLUDING ALL)Alvaro Herrera2018-03-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The LIKE INCLUDING ALL clause to CREATE TABLE intuitively indicates cloning of extended statistics on the source table, but it failed to do so. Patch it up so that it does. Also include an INCLUDING STATISTICS option to the LIKE clause, so that the behavior can be requested individually, or excluded individually. While at it, reorder the INCLUDING options, both in code and in docs, in alphabetical order which makes more sense than feature-implementation order that was previously used. Backpatch this to Postgres 10, where extended statistics were introduced, because this is seen as an oversight in a fresh feature which is better to get consistent from the get-go instead of changing only in pg11. In pg11, comments on statistics objects are cloned too. In pg10 they are not, because I (Álvaro) was too coward to change the parse node as required to support it. Also, in pg10 I chose not to renumber the parser symbols for the various INCLUDING options in LIKE, for the same reason. Any corresponding user-visible changes (docs) are backpatched, though. Reported-by: Stephen Froehlich Author: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Tomas Vondra Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CY1PR0601MB1927315B45667A1B679D0FD5E5EF0@CY1PR0601MB1927.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
* Add prokind column, replacing proisagg and proiswindowPeter Eisentraut2018-03-02
| | | | | | | | | | The new column distinguishes normal functions, procedures, aggregates, and window functions. This replaces the existing columns proisagg and proiswindow, and replaces the convention that procedures are indicated by prorettype == 0. Also change prorettype to be VOIDOID for procedures. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
* Support parameters in CALLPeter Eisentraut2018-02-22
| | | | | | | To support parameters in CALL, move the parse analysis of the procedure and arguments into the global transformation phase, so that the parser hooks can be applied. And then at execution time pass the parameters from ProcessUtility on to ExecuteCallStmt.
* Allow UNIQUE indexes on partitioned tablesAlvaro Herrera2018-02-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If we restrict unique constraints on partitioned tables so that they must always include the partition key, then our standard approach to unique indexes already works --- each unique key is forced to exist within a single partition, so enforcing the unique restriction in each index individually is enough to have it enforced globally. Therefore we can implement unique indexes on partitions by simply removing a few restrictions (and adding others.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171222212921.hi6hg6pem2w2t36z@alvherre.pgsql Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171229230607.3iib6b62fn3uaf47@alvherre.pgsql Reviewed-by: Simon Riggs, Jesper Pedersen, Peter Eisentraut, Jaime Casanova, Amit Langote
* get_relid_attribute_name is dead, long live get_attnameAlvaro Herrera2018-02-12
| | | | | | | | | The modern way is to use a missing_ok argument instead of two separate almost-identical routines, so do that. Author: Michaël Paquier Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180201063212.GE6398@paquier.xyz
* Fix oversight in CALL argument handling, and do some minor cleanup.Tom Lane2018-02-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CALL statements cannot support sub-SELECTs in the arguments of the called procedure, since they just use ExecEvalExpr to evaluate such arguments. Teach transformSubLink() to reject the case, as it already does for other contexts in which subqueries are not supported. In passing, s/EXPR_KIND_CALL/EXPR_KIND_CALL_ARGUMENT/ to make that enum symbol line up more closely with the phrasing of the error messages it is associated with. And fix someone's weak grasp of English grammar in the preceding EXPR_KIND_PARTITION_EXPRESSION addition. Also update an incorrect comment in resolve_unique_index_expr (possibly it was correct when written, but nowadays transformExpr definitely does reject SRFs here). Per report from Pavel Stehule --- but this resolves only one of the bugs he mentions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRDxOwPPzpA8i+AQeDQFj7bhVw-dR2==rfWZ3zMGkm568Q@mail.gmail.com
* Support all SQL:2011 options for window frame clauses.Tom Lane2018-02-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds the ability to use "RANGE offset PRECEDING/FOLLOWING" frame boundaries in window functions. We'd punted on that back in the original patch to add window functions, because it was not clear how to do it in a reasonably data-type-extensible fashion. That problem is resolved here by adding the ability for btree operator classes to provide an "in_range" support function that defines how to add or subtract the RANGE offset value. Factoring it this way also allows the operator class to avoid overflow problems near the ends of the datatype's range, if it wishes to expend effort on that. (In the committed patch, the integer opclasses handle that issue, but it did not seem worth the trouble to avoid overflow failures for datetime types.) The patch includes in_range support for the integer_ops opfamily (int2/int4/int8) as well as the standard datetime types. Support for other numeric types has been requested, but that seems like suitable material for a follow-on patch. In addition, the patch adds GROUPS mode which counts the offset in ORDER-BY peer groups rather than rows, and it adds the frame_exclusion options specified by SQL:2011. As far as I can see, we are now fully up to spec on window framing options. Existing behaviors remain unchanged, except that I changed the errcode for a couple of existing error reports to meet the SQL spec's expectation that negative "offset" values should be reported as SQLSTATE 22013. Internally and in relevant parts of the documentation, we now consistently use the terminology "offset PRECEDING/FOLLOWING" rather than "value PRECEDING/FOLLOWING", since the term "value" is confusingly vague. Oliver Ford, reviewed and whacked around some by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGMVOdu9sivPAxbNN0X+q19Sfv9edEPv=HibOJhB14TJv_RCQg@mail.gmail.com
* Fix application of identity values in some casesPeter Eisentraut2018-02-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Investigation of 2d2d06b7e27e3177d5bef0061801c75946871db3 revealed that identity values were not applied in some further cases, including logical replication subscribers, VALUES RTEs, and ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN. To fix all that, apply the identity column expression in build_column_default() instead of repeating the same logic at each call site. For ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN ... IDENTITY, the previous coding completely ignored that existing rows for the new column should have values filled in from the identity sequence. The coding using build_column_default() fails for this because the sequence ownership isn't registered until after ALTER TABLE, and we can't do it before because we don't have the column in the catalog yet. So we specially remember in ColumnDef the sequence name that we decided on and build a custom NextValueExpr using that. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* Fix typo: colums -> columns.Robert Haas2018-01-31
| | | | | | | | Along the way, also fix code indentation. Alexander Lakhin, reviewed by Michael Paquier Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/45c44aa7-7cfa-7f3b-83fd-d8300677fdda@gmail.com
* Avoid unnecessary use of pg_strcasecmp for already-downcased identifiers.Tom Lane2018-01-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We have a lot of code in which option names, which from the user's viewpoint are logically keywords, are passed through the grammar as plain identifiers, and then matched to string literals during command execution. This approach avoids making words into lexer keywords unnecessarily. Some places matched these strings using plain strcmp, some using pg_strcasecmp. But the latter should be unnecessary since identifiers would have been downcased on their way through the parser. Aside from any efficiency concerns (probably not a big factor), the lack of consistency in this area creates a hazard of subtle bugs due to different places coming to different conclusions about whether two option names are the same or different. Hence, standardize on using strcmp() to match any option names that are expected to have been fed through the parser. This does create a user-visible behavioral change, which is that while formerly all of these would work: alter table foo set (fillfactor = 50); alter table foo set (FillFactor = 50); alter table foo set ("fillfactor" = 50); alter table foo set ("FillFactor" = 50); now the last case will fail because that double-quoted identifier is different from the others. However, none of our documentation says that you can use a quoted identifier in such contexts at all, and we should discourage doing so since it would break if we ever decide to parse such constructs as true lexer keywords rather than poor man's substitutes. So this shouldn't create a significant compatibility issue for users. Daniel Gustafsson, reviewed by Michael Paquier, small changes by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/29405B24-564E-476B-98C0-677A29805B84@yesql.se
* Remove the obsolete WITH clause of CREATE FUNCTION.Tom Lane2018-01-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This clause was superseded by SQL-standard syntax back in 7.3. We've kept it around for backwards-compatibility purposes ever since; but 15 years seems like long enough for that, especially seeing that there are undocumented weirdnesses in how it interacts with the SQL-standard syntax for specifying the same options. Michael Paquier, per an observation by Daniel Gustafsson; some small cosmetic adjustments to nearby code by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180115022748.GB1724@paquier.xyz
* Replace AclObjectKind with ObjectTypePeter Eisentraut2018-01-19
| | | | | | | | | AclObjectKind was basically just another enumeration for object types, and we already have a preferred one for that. It's only used in aclcheck_error. By using ObjectType instead, we can also give some more precise error messages, for example "index" instead of "relation". Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* Replace GrantObjectType with ObjectTypePeter Eisentraut2018-01-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There used to be a lot of different *Type and *Kind symbol groups to address objects within different commands, most of which have been replaced by ObjectType, starting with b256f2426433c56b4bea3a8102757749885b81ba. But this conversion was never done for the ACL commands until now. This change ends up being just a plain replacement of the types and symbols, without any code restructuring needed, except deleting some now redundant code. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
* Local partitioned indexesAlvaro Herrera2018-01-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When CREATE INDEX is run on a partitioned table, create catalog entries for an index on the partitioned table (which is just a placeholder since the table proper has no data of its own), and recurse to create actual indexes on the existing partitions; create them in future partitions also. As a convenience gadget, if the new index definition matches some existing index in partitions, these are picked up and used instead of creating new ones. Whichever way these indexes come about, they become attached to the index on the parent table and are dropped alongside it, and cannot be dropped on isolation unless they are detached first. To support pg_dump'ing these indexes, add commands CREATE INDEX ON ONLY <table> (which creates the index on the parent partitioned table, without recursing) and ALTER INDEX ATTACH PARTITION (which is used after the indexes have been created individually on each partition, to attach them to the parent index). These reconstruct prior database state exactly. Reviewed-by: (in alphabetical order) Peter Eisentraut, Robert Haas, Amit Langote, Jesper Pedersen, Simon Riggs, David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171113170646.gzweigyrgg6pwsg4@alvherre.pgsql
* Don't allow VACUUM VERBOSE ANALYZE VERBOSE.Robert Haas2018-01-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | There are plans to extend the syntax for ANALYZE, so we need to break the link between VacuumStmt and AnalyzeStmt. But apart from that, the syntax above is undocumented and, if discovered by users, might give the impression that the VERBOSE option for VACUUM differs from the verbose option from ANALYZE, which it does not. Nathan Bossart, reviewed by Michael Paquier and Masahiko Sawada Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/D3FC73E2-9B1A-4DB4-8180-55F57D116B4E@amazon.com
* Update copyright for 2018Bruce Momjian2018-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.3
* Fix crash when using CALL on an aggregatePeter Eisentraut2017-12-13
| | | | | Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> Reported-by: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>
* Fix typoMagnus Hagander2017-12-09
| | | | Reported by Robins Tharakan
* Prohibit identity columns on typed tables and partitionsPeter Eisentraut2017-12-08
| | | | | | | | | | Those cases currently crash and supporting them is more work then originally thought, so we'll just prohibit these scenarios for now. Author: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> Reported-by: Мансур Галиев <gomer94@yandex.ru> Bug: #14866
* Re-allow INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on partitioned tables.Robert Haas2017-12-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 8355a011a0124bdf7ccbada206a967d427039553 was reverted in f05230752d53c4aa74cffa9b699983bbb6bcb118, but this attempt is hopefully better-considered: we now pass the correct value to ExecOpenIndices, which should avoid the crash that we hit before. Amit Langote, reviewed by Simon Riggs and by me. Some final editing by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/7ff1e8ec-dc39-96b1-7f47-ff5965dceeac@lab.ntt.co.jp
* SQL proceduresPeter Eisentraut2017-11-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This adds a new object type "procedure" that is similar to a function but does not have a return type and is invoked by the new CALL statement instead of SELECT or similar. This implementation is aligned with the SQL standard and compatible with or similar to other SQL implementations. This commit adds new commands CALL, CREATE/ALTER/DROP PROCEDURE, as well as ALTER/DROP ROUTINE that can refer to either a function or a procedure (or an aggregate function, as an extension to SQL). There is also support for procedures in various utility commands such as COMMENT and GRANT, as well as support in pg_dump and psql. Support for defining procedures is available in all the languages supplied by the core distribution. While this commit is mainly syntax sugar around existing functionality, future features will rely on having procedures as a separate object type. Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
* Add some const decorations to prototypesPeter Eisentraut2017-11-10
| | | | Reviewed-by: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
* Add hash partitioning.Robert Haas2017-11-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Hash partitioning is useful when you want to partition a growing data set evenly. This can be useful to keep table sizes reasonable, which makes maintenance operations such as VACUUM faster, or to enable partition-wise join. At present, we still depend on constraint exclusion for partitioning pruning, and the shape of the partition constraints for hash partitioning is such that that doesn't work. Work is underway to fix that, which should both improve performance and make partitioning pruning work with hash partitioning. Amul Sul, reviewed and tested by Dilip Kumar, Ashutosh Bapat, Yugo Nagata, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Jesper Pedersen, and by me. A few final tweaks also by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b96fhpJAP=ALbETmeLk1Uni_GFZD938zgenhF49qgDTjaQ@mail.gmail.com
* Change TRUE/FALSE to true/falsePeter Eisentraut2017-11-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The lower case spellings are C and C++ standard and are used in most parts of the PostgreSQL sources. The upper case spellings are only used in some files/modules. So standardize on the standard spellings. The APIs for ICU, Perl, and Windows define their own TRUE and FALSE, so those are left as is when using those APIs. In code comments, we use the lower-case spelling for the C concepts and keep the upper-case spelling for the SQL concepts. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* Always require SELECT permission for ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE.Dean Rasheed2017-11-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The update path of an INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE requires SELECT permission on the columns of the arbiter index, but it failed to check for that in the case of an arbiter specified by constraint name. In addition, for a table with row level security enabled, it failed to check updated rows against the table's SELECT policies when the update path was taken (regardless of how the arbiter index was specified). Backpatch to 9.5 where ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE and RLS were introduced. Security: CVE-2017-15099
* Dept of second thoughts: keep aliasp_item in sync with tlistitem.Tom Lane2017-10-27
| | | | | | | | Commit d5b760ecb wasn't quite right, on second thought: if the caller didn't ask for column names then it would happily emit more Vars than if the caller did ask for column names. This is surely not a good idea. Advance the aliasp_item whether or not we're preparing a colnames list.
* Fix crash when columns have been added to the end of a view.Tom Lane2017-10-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | expandRTE() supposed that an RTE_SUBQUERY subquery must have exactly as many non-junk tlist items as the RTE has column aliases for it. This was true at the time the code was written, and is still true so far as parse analysis is concerned --- but when the function is used during planning, the subquery might have appeared through insertion of a view that now has more columns than it did when the outer query was parsed. This results in a core dump if, for instance, we have to expand a whole-row Var that references the subquery. To avoid crashing, we can either stop expanding the RTE when we run out of aliases, or invent new aliases for the added columns. While the latter might be more useful, the former is consistent with what expandRTE() does for composite-returning functions in the RTE_FUNCTION case, so it seems like we'd better do it that way. Per bug #14876 from Samuel Horwitz. This has been busted since commit ff1ea2173 allowed views to acquire more columns, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171026184035.1471.82810@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Support domains over composite types.Tom Lane2017-10-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is the last major omission in our domains feature: you can now make a domain over anything that's not a pseudotype. The major complication from an implementation standpoint is that places that might be creating tuples of a domain type now need to be prepared to apply domain_check(). It seems better that unprepared code fail with an error like "<type> is not composite" than that it silently fail to apply domain constraints. Therefore, relevant infrastructure like get_func_result_type() and lookup_rowtype_tupdesc() has been adjusted to treat domain-over-composite as a distinct case that unprepared code won't recognize, rather than just transparently treating it the same as plain composite. This isn't a 100% solution to the possibility of overlooked domain checks, but it catches most places. In passing, improve typcache.c's support for domains (it can now cache the identity of a domain's base type), and rewrite the argument handling logic in jsonfuncs.c's populate_record[set]_worker to reduce duplicative per-call lookups. I believe this is code-complete so far as the core and contrib code go. The PLs need varying amounts of work, which will be tackled in followup patches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4206.1499798337@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix incorrect handling of CTEs and ENRs as DML target relations.Tom Lane2017-10-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | setTargetTable threw an error if the proposed target RangeVar's relname matched any visible CTE or ENR. This breaks backwards compatibility in the CTE case, since pre-v10 we never looked for a CTE here at all, so that CTE names did not mask regular tables. It does seem like a good idea to throw an error for the ENR case, though, thus causing ENRs to mask tables for this purpose; ENRs are new in v10 so we're not breaking existing code, and we may someday want to allow them to be the targets of DML. To fix that, replace use of getRTEForSpecialRelationTypes, which was overkill anyway, with use of scanNameSpaceForENR. A second problem was that the check neglected to verify null schemaname, so that a CTE or ENR could incorrectly be thought to match a qualified RangeVar. That happened because getRTEForSpecialRelationTypes relied on its caller to have checked for null schemaname. Even though the one remaining caller got it right, this is obviously bug-prone, so move the check inside getRTEForSpecialRelationTypes. Also, revert commit 18ce3a4ab's extremely poorly thought out decision to add a NULL return case to parserOpenTable --- without either documenting that or adjusting any of the callers to check for it. The current bug seems to have arisen in part due to working around that bad idea. In passing, remove the one-line shim functions transformCTEReference and transformENRReference --- they don't seem to be adding any clarity or functionality. Per report from Hugo Mercier (via Julien Rouhaud). Back-patch to v10 where the bug was introduced. Thomas Munro, with minor editing by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_YdPVH+PTtiKSSLOiiW3mVDYsnNUekK+XPbHXiP=wrFLA@mail.gmail.com
* Exclude flex-generated code from coverage testingPeter Eisentraut2017-10-16
| | | | | | | | | | Flex generates a lot of functions that are not actually used. In order to avoid coverage figures being ruined by that, mark up the part of the .l files where the generated code appears by lcov exclusion markers. That way, lcov will typically only reported on coverage for the .l file, which is under our control, but not for the .c file. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* Allow multiple tables to be specified in one VACUUM or ANALYZE command.Tom Lane2017-10-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Not much to say about this; does what it says on the tin. However, formerly, if there was a column list then the ANALYZE action was implied; now it must be specified, or you get an error. This is because it would otherwise be a bit unclear what the user meant if some tables have column lists and some don't. Nathan Bossart, reviewed by Michael Paquier and Masahiko Sawada, with some editorialization by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E061A8E3-5E3D-494D-94F0-E8A9B312BBFC@amazon.com
* Support arrays over domains.Tom Lane2017-09-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Allowing arrays with a domain type as their element type was left un-done in the original domain patch, but not for any very good reason. This omission leads to such surprising results as array_agg() not working on a domain column, because the parser can't identify a suitable output type for the polymorphic aggregate. In order to fix this, first clean up the APIs of coerce_to_domain() and some internal functions in parse_coerce.c so that we consistently pass around a CoercionContext along with CoercionForm. Previously, we sometimes passed an "isExplicit" boolean flag instead, which is strictly less information; and coerce_to_domain() didn't even get that, but instead had to reverse-engineer isExplicit from CoercionForm. That's contrary to the documentation in primnodes.h that says that CoercionForm only affects display and not semantics. I don't think this change fixes any live bugs, but it makes things more consistent. The main reason for doing it though is that now build_coercion_expression() receives ccontext, which it needs in order to be able to recursively invoke coerce_to_target_type(). Next, reimplement ArrayCoerceExpr so that the node does not directly know any details of what has to be done to the individual array elements while performing the array coercion. Instead, the per-element processing is represented by a sub-expression whose input is a source array element and whose output is a target array element. This simplifies life in parse_coerce.c, because it can build that sub-expression by a recursive invocation of coerce_to_target_type(). The executor now handles the per-element processing as a compiled expression instead of hard-wired code. The main advantage of this is that we can use a single ArrayCoerceExpr to handle as many as three successive steps per element: base type conversion, typmod coercion, and domain constraint checking. The old code used two stacked ArrayCoerceExprs to handle type + typmod coercion, which was pretty inefficient, and adding yet another array deconstruction to do domain constraint checking seemed very unappetizing. In the case where we just need a single, very simple coercion function, doing this straightforwardly leads to a noticeable increase in the per-array-element runtime cost. Hence, add an additional shortcut evalfunc in execExprInterp.c that skips unnecessary overhead for that specific form of expression. The runtime speed of simple cases is within 1% or so of where it was before, while cases that previously required two levels of array processing are significantly faster. Finally, create an implicit array type for every domain type, as we do for base types, enums, etc. Everything except the array-coercion case seems to just work without further effort. Tom Lane, reviewed by Andrew Dunstan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9852.1499791473@sss.pgh.pa.us
* After a MINVALUE/MAXVALUE bound, allow only more of the same.Robert Haas2017-09-15
| | | | | | | | | | In the old syntax, which used UNBOUNDED, we had a similar restriction, but commit d363d42bb9a4399a0207bd3b371c966e22e06bd3, which changed the syntax, eliminated it. Put it back. Patch by me, reviewed by Dean Rasheed. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobs+pLPC27tS3gOpEAxAffHrq5w509cvkwTf9pF6cWYbg@mail.gmail.com
* Allow a partitioned table to have a default partition.Robert Haas2017-09-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Any tuples that don't route to any other partition will route to the default partition. Jeevan Ladhe, Beena Emerson, Ashutosh Bapat, Rahila Syed, and Robert Haas, with review and testing at various stages by (at least) Rushabh Lathia, Keith Fiske, Amit Langote, Amul Sul, Rajkumar Raghuanshi, Sven Kunze, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Thom Brown, Rafia Sabih, and Dilip Kumar. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAH2L28tbN4SYyhS7YV1YBWcitkqbhSWfQCy0G=apRcC_PEO-bg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAOG9ApEYj34fWMcvBMBQ-YtqR9fTdXhdN82QEKG0SVZ6zeL1xg@mail.gmail.com
* Reduce excessive dereferencing of function pointersPeter Eisentraut2017-09-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | It is equivalent in ANSI C to write (*funcptr) () and funcptr(). These two styles have been applied inconsistently. After discussion, we'll use the more verbose style for plain function pointer variables, to make it clear that it's a variable, and the shorter style when the function pointer is in a struct (s.func() or s->func()), because then it's clear that it's not a plain function name, and otherwise the excessive punctuation makes some of those invocations hard to read. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f52c16db-14ed-757d-4b48-7ef360b1631d@2ndquadrant.com
* Allow SET STATISTICS on expression indexesSimon Riggs2017-09-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Index columns are referenced by ordinal number rather than name, e.g. CREATE INDEX coord_idx ON measured (x, y, (z + t)); ALTER INDEX coord_idx ALTER COLUMN 3 SET STATISTICS 1000; Incompatibility note for release notes: \d+ for indexes now also displays Stats Target Authors: Alexander Korotkov, with contribution by Adrien NAYRAT Review: Adrien NAYRAT, Simon Riggs Wordsmith: Simon Riggs
* Clean up handling of dropped columns in NAMEDTUPLESTORE RTEs.Tom Lane2017-09-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The NAMEDTUPLESTORE patch piggybacked on the infrastructure for TABLEFUNC/VALUES/CTE RTEs, none of which can ever have dropped columns, so the possibility was ignored most places. Fix that, including adding a specification to parsenodes.h about what it's supposed to look like. In passing, clean up assorted comments that hadn't been maintained properly by said patch. Per bug #14799 from Philippe Beaudoin. Back-patch to v10. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170906120005.25630.84360@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Improve plural handling in error messagePeter Eisentraut2017-08-23
| | | | | This does not use the normal plural handling, because no numbers appear in the actual message.
* Change tupledesc->attrs[n] to TupleDescAttr(tupledesc, n).Andres Freund2017-08-20
| | | | | | | | | | | This is a mechanical change in preparation for a later commit that will change the layout of TupleDesc. Introducing a macro to abstract the details of where attributes are stored will allow us to change that in separate step and revise it in future. Author: Thomas Munro, editorialized by Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0ZtQ-SpsgCyzzYpsXS6e=kZWqk3g5Ygn3MDV7A8dabUA@mail.gmail.com
* Final pgindent + perltidy run for v10.Tom Lane2017-08-14
|
* Further unify ROLE and USER command grammar rulesPeter Eisentraut2017-08-03
| | | | | | | | ALTER USER ... SET did not support all the syntax variants of ALTER ROLE ... SET. Fix that, and to avoid further deviations of this kind, unify many the grammar rules for ROLE/USER/GROUP commands. Reported-by: Pavel Golub <pavel@microolap.com>
* Allow a foreign table CHECK constraint to be initially NOT VALID.Robert Haas2017-08-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | For a table, the constraint can be considered validated immediately, because the table must be empty. But for a foreign table this is not necessarily the case. Fixes a bug in commit f27a6b15e6566fba7748d0d9a3fc5bcfd52c4a1b. Amit Langote, with some changes by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/d2b7419f-4a71-cf86-cc99-bfd0f359a1ea@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Teach map_partition_varattnos to handle whole-row expressions.Robert Haas2017-08-03
| | | | | | | | | | Otherwise, partitioned tables with RETURNING expressions or subject to a WITH CHECK OPTION do not work properly. Amit Langote, reviewed by Amit Khandekar and Etsuro Fujita. A few comment changes by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/9a39df80-871e-6212-0684-f93c83be4097@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Fix OBJECT_TYPE/OBJECT_DOMAIN confusionPeter Eisentraut2017-08-02
| | | | | | | This doesn't have a significant impact except that now SECURITY LABEL ON DOMAIN rejects types that are not domains. Reported-by: 高增琦 <pgf00a@gmail.com>
* Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED for range partition bounds.Dean Rasheed2017-07-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, UNBOUNDED meant no lower bound when used in the FROM list, and no upper bound when used in the TO list, which was OK for single-column range partitioning, but problematic with multiple columns. For example, an upper bound of (10.0, UNBOUNDED) would not be collocated with a lower bound of (10.0, UNBOUNDED), thus making it difficult or impossible to define contiguous multi-column range partitions in some cases. Fix this by using MINVALUE and MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED to represent a partition column that is unbounded below or above respectively. This syntax removes any ambiguity, and ensures that if one partition's lower bound equals another partition's upper bound, then the partitions are contiguous. Also drop the constraint prohibiting finite values after an unbounded column, and just document the fact that any values after MINVALUE or MAXVALUE are ignored. Previously it was necessary to repeat UNBOUNDED multiple times, which was needlessly verbose. Note: Forces a post-PG 10 beta2 initdb. Report by Amul Sul, original patch by Amit Langote with some additional hacking by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b947mowpLdxL3jo3YLKngRjrq9+Ej4ymduQTfYR+8=YAYQ@mail.gmail.com
* Re-allow SRFs and window functions within sub-selects within aggregates.Tom Lane2017-06-27
| | | | | | | | | | | check_agg_arguments_walker threw an error upon seeing a SRF or window function, but that is too aggressive: if the function is within a sub-select then it's perfectly fine. I broke the SRF case in commit 0436f6bde by copying the logic for window functions ... but that was broken too, and had been since commit eaccfded9. Repair both cases in HEAD, and the window function case back to 9.3. 9.2 gets this right.
* Fix IF NOT EXISTS in CREATE STATISTICSAlvaro Herrera2017-06-22
| | | | | | | | | | | I misplaced the IF NOT EXISTS clause in commit 7b504eb282, before the word STATISTICS. Put it where it belongs. Patch written independently by Amit Langote and myself. I adopted his submitted test case with a slight edit also. Reported-by: Bruno Wolff III Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170621004237.GB8337@wolff.to
* Phase 3 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they flow past the right margin. By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin, then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin, if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column limit. This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers. Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Phase 2 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Initial pgindent run with pg_bsd_indent version 2.0.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The new indent version includes numerous fixes thanks to Piotr Stefaniak. The main changes visible in this commit are: * Nicer formatting of function-pointer declarations. * No longer unexpectedly removes spaces in expressions using casts, sizeof, or offsetof. * No longer wants to add a space in "struct structname *varname", as well as some similar cases for const- or volatile-qualified pointers. * Declarations using PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY are formatted more nicely. * Fixes bug where comments following declarations were sometimes placed with no space separating them from the code. * Fixes some odd decisions for comments following case labels. * Fixes some cases where comments following code were indented to less than the expected column 33. On the less good side, it now tends to put more whitespace around typedef names that are not listed in typedefs.list. This might encourage us to put more effort into typedef name collection; it's not really a bug in indent itself. There are more changes coming after this round, having to do with comment indentation and alignment of lines appearing within parentheses. I wanted to limit the size of the diffs to something that could be reviewed without one's eyes completely glazing over, so it seemed better to split up the changes as much as practical. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us