aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/port
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Try to find out the actual hugepage size when making a MAP_HUGETLB request.Tom Lane2016-10-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Even if Linux's mmap() is okay with a partial-hugepage request, munmap() is not, as reported by Chris Richards. Therefore it behooves us to try a bit harder to find out the actual hugepage size, instead of assuming that we can skate by with a guess. For the moment, just look into /proc/meminfo to find out the default hugepage size, and use that. Later, on kernels that support requests for nondefault sizes, we might try to consider other alternatives. But that smells more like a new feature than a bug fix, especially if we want to provide any way for the DBA to control it, so leave it for another day. I set this up to allow easy addition of platform-specific code for non-Linux platforms, if needed; but right now there are no reports suggesting that we need to work harder on other platforms. Back-patch to 9.4 where hugepage support was introduced. Discussion: <31056.1476303954@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Clean up handling of anonymous mmap'd shared-memory segment.Tom Lane2016-10-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix detaching of the mmap'd segment to have its own on_shmem_exit callback, rather than piggybacking on the one for detaching from the SysV segment. That was confusing, and given the distance between the two attach calls, it was trouble waiting to happen. Make the detaching calls idempotent by clearing AnonymousShmem to show we've already unmapped. I spent quite a bit of time yesterday trying to find a path that would allow the munmap()'s to be done twice, and while I did not succeed, it seems silly that there's even a question. Make the #ifdef logic less confusing by separating "do we want to use anonymous shmem" from EXEC_BACKEND. Even though there's no current scenario where those conditions are different, it is not helpful for different places in the same file to be testing EXEC_BACKEND for what are fundamentally different reasons. Don't do on_exit_reset() in StartBackgroundWorker(). At best that's useless (InitPostmasterChild would have done it already) and at worst it could zap some callback that's unrelated to shared memory. Improve comments, and simplify the huge_pages enablement logic slightly. Back-patch to 9.4 where hugepage support was introduced. Arguably this should go into 9.3 as well, but the code looks significantly different there, and I doubt it's worth the trouble of adapting the patch given I can't show a live bug.
* Fix fallback implementation of pg_atomic_write_u32().Andres Freund2016-10-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I somehow had assumed that in the spinlock (in turn possibly using semaphores) based fallback atomics implementation 32 bit writes could be done without a lock. As far as the write goes that's correct, since postgres supports only platforms with single-copy atomicity for aligned 32bit writes. But writing without holding the spinlock breaks read-modify-write operations like pg_atomic_compare_exchange_u32(), since they'll potentially "miss" a concurrent write, which can't happen in actual hardware implementations. In 9.6+ when using the fallback atomics implementation this could lead to buffer header locks not being properly marked as released, and potentially some related state corruption. I don't see a related danger in 9.5 (earliest release with the API), because pg_atomic_write_u32() wasn't used in a concurrent manner there. The state variable of local buffers, before this change, were manipulated using pg_atomic_write_u32(), to avoid unnecessary synchronization overhead. As that'd not be the case anymore, introduce and use pg_atomic_unlocked_write_u32(), which does not correctly interact with RMW operations. This bug only caused issues when postgres is compiled on platforms without atomics support (i.e. no common new platform), or when compiled with --disable-atomics, which explains why this wasn't noticed in testing. Reported-By: Tom Lane Discussion: <14947.1475690465@sss.pgh.pa.us> Backpatch: 9.5-, where the atomic operations API was introduced.
* Support building with Visual Studio 2015Andrew Dunstan2016-04-29
| | | | | | | | | | | Adjust the way we detect the locale. As a result the minumum Windows version supported by VS2015 and later is Windows Vista. Add some tweaks to remove new compiler warnings. Remove documentation references to the now obsolete msysGit. Michael Paquier, somewhat edited by me, reviewed by Christian Ullrich. Backpatch to 9.5
* Improve TranslateSocketError() to handle more Windows error codes.Tom Lane2016-04-21
| | | | | | The coverage was rather lean for cases that bind() or listen() might return. Add entries for everything that there's a direct equivalent for in the set of Unix errnos that elog.c has heard of.
* Provide errno-translation wrappers around bind() and listen() on Windows.Tom Lane2016-04-21
| | | | | | | | | Fix Windows builds to report something useful rather than "could not bind IPv4 socket: No error" when bind() fails. Back-patch of commits d1b7d4877b9a71f4 and 22989a8e34168f57. Discussion: <4065.1452450340@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Fix latent portability issue in pgwin32_dispatch_queued_signals().Tom Lane2016-04-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The first iteration of the signal-checking loop would compute sigmask(0) which expands to 1<<(-1) which is undefined behavior according to the C standard. The lack of field reports of trouble suggest that it evaluates to 0 on all existing Windows compilers, but that's hardly something to rely on. Since signal 0 isn't a queueable signal anyway, we can just make the loop iterate from 1 instead, and save a few cycles as well as avoiding the undefined behavior. In passing, avoid evaluating the volatile expression UNBLOCKED_SIGNAL_QUEUE twice in a row; there's no reason to waste cycles like that. Noted by Aleksander Alekseev, though this isn't his proposed fix. Back-patch to all supported branches.
* Avoid possibly-unsafe use of Windows' FormatMessage() function.Tom Lane2016-03-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | Whenever this function is used with the FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM flag, it's good practice to include FORMAT_MESSAGE_IGNORE_INSERTS as well. Otherwise, if the message contains any %n insertion markers, the function will try to fetch argument strings to substitute --- which we are not passing, possibly leading to a crash. This is exactly analogous to the rule about not giving printf() a format string you're not in control of. Noted and patched by Christian Ullrich. Back-patch to all supported branches.
* Fix treatment of *lpNumberOfBytesRecvd == 0: that's a completion condition.Tom Lane2016-01-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | pgwin32_recv() has treated a non-error return of zero bytes from WSARecv() as being a reason to block ever since the current implementation was introduced in commit a4c40f140d23cefb. However, so far as one can tell from Microsoft's documentation, that is just wrong: what it means is graceful connection closure (in stream protocols) or receipt of a zero-length message (in message protocols), and neither case should result in blocking here. The only reason the code worked at all was that control then fell into the retry loop, which did *not* treat zero bytes specially, so we'd get out after only wasting some cycles. But as of 9.5 we do not normally reach the retry loop and so the bug is exposed, as reported by Shay Rojansky and diagnosed by Andres Freund. Remove the unnecessary test on the byte count, and rearrange the code in the retry loop so that it looks identical to the initial sequence. Back-patch to 9.5. The code is wrong all the way back, AFAICS, but since it's relatively harmless in earlier branches we'll leave it alone.
* On Windows, ensure shared memory handle gets closed if not being used.Tom Lane2015-10-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Postmaster child processes that aren't supposed to be attached to shared memory were not bothering to close the shared memory mapping handle they inherit from the postmaster process. That's mostly harmless, since the handle vanishes anyway when the child process exits -- but the syslogger process, if used, doesn't get killed and restarted during recovery from a backend crash. That meant that Windows doesn't see the shared memory mapping as becoming free, so it doesn't delete it and the postmaster is unable to create a new one, resulting in failure to recover from crashes whenever logging_collector is turned on. Per report from Dmitry Vasilyev. It's a bit astonishing that we'd not figured this out long ago, since it's been broken from the very beginnings of out native Windows support; probably some previously-unexplained trouble reports trace to this. A secondary problem is that on Cygwin (perhaps only in older versions?), exec() may not detach from the shared memory segment after all, in which case these child processes did remain attached to shared memory, posing the risk of an unexpected shared memory clobber if they went off the rails somehow. That may be a long-gone bug, but we can deal with it now if it's still live, by detaching within the infrastructure introduced here to deal with closing the handle. Back-patch to all supported branches. Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
* Make WaitLatchOrSocket's timeout detection more robust.Tom Lane2015-07-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In the previous coding, timeout would be noticed and reported only when poll() or socket() returned zero (or the equivalent behavior on Windows). Ordinarily that should work well enough, but it seems conceivable that we could get into a state where poll() always returns a nonzero value --- for example, if it is noticing a condition on one of the file descriptors that we do not think is reason to exit the loop. If that happened, we'd be in a busy-wait loop that would fail to terminate even when the timeout expires. We can make this more robust at essentially no cost, by deciding to exit of our own accord if we compute a zero or negative time-remaining-to-wait. Previously the code noted this but just clamped the time-remaining to zero, expecting that we'd detect timeout on the next loop iteration. Back-patch to 9.2. While 9.1 had a version of WaitLatchOrSocket, it was primitive compared to later versions, and did not guarantee reliable detection of timeouts anyway. (Essentially, this is a refinement of commit 3e7fdcffd6f77187, which was back-patched only as far as 9.2.)
* Fix the fallback memory barrier implementation to be reentrant.Andres Freund2015-06-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This was essentially "broken" since 0c8eda62; but until more recently (14e8803f) barriers usage in signal handlers was infrequent. The failure to be reentrant was noticed because the test_shm_mq, which uses memory barriers at a high frequency, occasionally got stuck on some solaris buildfarm animals. Turns out, those machines use sun studio 12.1, which doesn't yet have efficient memory barrier support. A machine with a newer sun studio did not fail. Forcing the barrier fallback to be used on x86 allows to reproduce the problem. The new fallback is to use kill(PostmasterPid, 0) based on the theory that that'll always imply a barrier due to checking the liveliness of PostmasterPid on systems old enough to need fallback support. It's hard to come up with a good and performant fallback. I'm not backpatching this for now - the problem isn't active in the back branches, and we haven't backpatched barrier changes for now. Additionally master looks entirely different than the back branches due to the new atomics abstraction. It seems better to let this rest in master, where the non-reentrancy actively causes a problem, and then consider backpatching. Found-By: Robert Haas Discussion: 55626265.3060800@dunslane.net
* pgindent run for 9.5Bruce Momjian2015-05-23
|
* Collection of typo fixes.Heikki Linnakangas2015-05-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Use "a" and "an" correctly, mostly in comments. Two error messages were also fixed (they were just elogs, so no translation work required). Two function comments in pg_proc.h were also fixed. Etsuro Fujita reported one of these, but I found a lot more with grep. Also fix a few other typos spotted while grepping for the a/an typos. For example, "consists out of ..." -> "consists of ...". Plus a "though"/ "through" mixup reported by Euler Taveira. Many of these typos were in old code, which would be nice to backpatch to make future backpatching easier. But much of the code was new, and I didn't feel like crafting separate patches for each branch. So no backpatching.
* Remove the option to service interrupts during PGSemaphoreLock().Andres Freund2015-02-03
| | | | | | | | | The remaining caller (lwlocks) doesn't need that facility, and we plan to remove ImmedidateInterruptOK entirely. That means that interrupts can't be serviced race-free and portably anyway, so there's little reason for keeping the feature. Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas
* Add barriers to the latch code.Andres Freund2015-01-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since their introduction latches have required barriers in SetLatch and ResetLatch - but when they were introduced there wasn't any barrier abstraction. Instead latches were documented to rely on the callsites to provide barrier semantics. Now that the barrier support looks halfway complete, add the necessary barriers to both latch implementations. Also remove a now superflous lock acquisition from syncrep.c and a superflous (and insufficient) barrier from freelist.c. There might be other cases that can now be simplified, but those are the only ones I've seen on a quick scan. We might want to backpatch this at some later point, but right now the barrier infrastructure in the backbranches isn't totally on par with master. Discussion: 20150112154026.GB2092@awork2.anarazel.de
* Allow latches to wait for socket writability without waiting for readability.Andres Freund2015-01-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | So far WaitLatchOrSocket() required to pass in WL_SOCKET_READABLE as that solely was used to indicate error conditions, like EOF. Waiting for WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE would have meant to busy wait upon socket errors. Adjust the API to signal errors by returning the socket as readable, writable or both, depending on WL_SOCKET_READABLE/WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE being specified. It would arguably be nicer to return WL_SOCKET_ERROR but that's not possible on platforms and would probably also result in more complex callsites. This previously had explicitly been forbidden in e42a21b9e6c9, as there was no strong use case at that point. We now are looking into making FE/BE communication use latches, so changing this makes sense. There also are some portability concerns because there cases of older platforms where select(2) is known to, in violation of POSIX, not return a socket as writable after the peer has closed it. So far the platforms where that's the case provide a working poll(2). If we find one where that's not the case, we'll need to add a workaround for that platform. Discussion: 20140927191243.GD5423@alap3.anarazel.de Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas, Noah Misch
* Provide a generic fallback for pg_compiler_barrier using an extern function.Andres Freund2015-01-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the compiler/arch combination does not provide compiler barriers, provide a fallback. That fallback simply consists out of a function call into a externally defined function. That should guarantee compiler barrierer semantics except for compilers that do inter translation unit/global optimization - those better provide an actual compiler barrier. Hopefully this fixes Tom's report of linker failures due to pg_compiler_barrier_impl not being provided. I'm not backpatching this commit as it builds on the new atomics infrastructure. If we decide an equivalent fix needs to be backpatched, I'll do so in a separate commit. Discussion: 27746.1420930690@sss.pgh.pa.us Per report from Tom Lane.
* Update copyright for 2015Bruce Momjian2015-01-06
| | | | Backpatch certain files through 9.0
* Add a basic atomic ops API abstracting away platform/architecture details.Andres Freund2014-09-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Several upcoming performance/scalability improvements require atomic operations. This new API avoids the need to splatter compiler and architecture dependent code over all the locations employing atomic ops. For several of the potential usages it'd be problematic to maintain both, a atomics using implementation and one using spinlocks or similar. In all likelihood one of the implementations would not get tested regularly under concurrency. To avoid that scenario the new API provides a automatic fallback of atomic operations to spinlocks. All properties of atomic operations are maintained. This fallback - obviously - isn't as fast as just using atomic ops, but it's not bad either. For one of the future users the atomics ontop spinlocks implementation was actually slightly faster than the old purely spinlock using implementation. That's important because it reduces the fear of regressing older platforms when improving the scalability for new ones. The API, loosely modeled after the C11 atomics support, currently provides 'atomic flags' and 32 bit unsigned integers. If the platform efficiently supports atomic 64 bit unsigned integers those are also provided. To implement atomics support for a platform/architecture/compiler for a type of atomics 32bit compare and exchange needs to be implemented. If available and more efficient native support for flags, 32 bit atomic addition, and corresponding 64 bit operations may also be provided. Additional useful atomic operations are implemented generically ontop of these. The implementation for various versions of gcc, msvc and sun studio have been tested. Additional existing stub implementations for * Intel icc * HUPX acc * IBM xlc are included but have never been tested. These will likely require fixes based on buildfarm and user feedback. As atomic operations also require barriers for some operations the existing barrier support has been moved into the atomics code. Author: Andres Freund with contributions from Oskari Saarenmaa Reviewed-By: Amit Kapila, Robert Haas, Heikki Linnakangas and Álvaro Herrera Discussion: CA+TgmoYBW+ux5-8Ja=Mcyuy8=VXAnVRHp3Kess6Pn3DMXAPAEA@mail.gmail.com, 20131015123303.GH5300@awork2.anarazel.de, 20131028205522.GI20248@awork2.anarazel.de
* Fix spinlock implementation for some !solaris sparc platforms.Andres Freund2014-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some Sparc CPUs can be run in various coherence models, ranging from RMO (relaxed) over PSO (partial) to TSO (total). Solaris has always run CPUs in TSO mode while in userland, but linux didn't use to and the various *BSDs still don't. Unfortunately the sparc TAS/S_UNLOCK were only correct under TSO. Fix that by adding the necessary memory barrier instructions. On sparcv8+, which should be all relevant CPUs, these are treated as NOPs if the current consistency model doesn't require the barriers. Discussion: 20140630222854.GW26930@awork2.anarazel.de Will be backpatched to all released branches once a few buildfarm cycles haven't shown up problems. As I've no access to sparc, this is blindly written.
* Assorted message improvementsPeter Eisentraut2014-08-29
|
* Handle WAIT_IO_COMPLETION return from WaitForMultipleObjectsEx().Noah Misch2014-07-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This return code is possible wherever we pass bAlertable = TRUE; it arises when Windows caused the current thread to run an "I/O completion routine" or an "asynchronous procedure call". PostgreSQL does not provoke either of those Windows facilities, hence this bug remaining largely unnoticed, but other local code might do so. Due to a shortage of complaints, no back-patch for now. Per report from Shiv Shivaraju Gowda, this bug can cause PGSemaphoreLock() to PANIC. The bug can also cause select() to report timeout expiration too early, which might confuse pgstat_init() and CheckRADIUSAuth().
* Remove Alpha and Tru64 support.Andres Freund2014-06-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Support for running postgres on Alpha hasn't been tested for a long while. Due to Alpha's uniquely lax cache coherency model it's a hard to develop for platform (especially blindly!) and thought to be unlikely to currently work correctly. As Alpha is the only supported architecture for Tru64 drop support for it as well. Tru64's support has ended 2012 and it has been in maintenance-only mode for much longer. Also remove stray references to __ksr__ and ultrix defines.
* Fix weird spacing in error message.Tom Lane2014-06-18
| | | | Seems to have been introduced in 1a3458b6d8d202715a83c88474a1b63726d0929e.
* Fix typos in comments.Noah Misch2014-06-11
|
* pgindent run for 9.4Bruce Momjian2014-05-06
| | | | | This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.
* check socket creation errors against PGINVALID_SOCKETBruce Momjian2014-04-16
| | | | | | | | Previously, in some places, socket creation errors were checked for negative values, which is not true for Windows because sockets are unsigned. This masked socket creation errors on Windows. Backpatch through 9.0. 8.4 doesn't have the infrastructure to fix this.
* Add missing include.Robert Haas2014-04-09
| | | | | | This is more cleanup from commit 11a65eed1637a05b03e174700799b024e104bfb4. Amit Kapila
* Fix silly oversight in patch to remove dsm state file.Robert Haas2014-04-08
| | | | | I'm not sure if this is what's causing the Windows buildfarm members to get unhappy, but I don't think it can be helping anything...
* Get rid of the dynamic shared memory state file.Robert Haas2014-04-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Instead of storing the ID of the dynamic shared memory control segment in a file within the data directory, store it in the main control segment. This avoids a number of nasty corner cases, most seriously that doing an online backup and then using it on the same machine (e.g. to fire up a standby) would result in the standby clobbering all of the master's dynamic shared memory segments. Per complaints from Heikki Linnakangas, Fujii Masao, and Tom Lane.
* Remove 'make clean' support for ipc_test.Robert Haas2014-04-07
| | | | I missed this in the previous commit; Tom Lane spotted my error.
* Remove ipc_test.Robert Haas2014-04-07
| | | | | | This doesn't seem to be useful any more, and it's not really worth the effort to keep updating it every time relevant dependencies or calling signatures in the shared memory or semaphore code change.
* Rename huge_tlb_pages to huge_pages, and improve docs.Heikki Linnakangas2014-03-03
| | | | Christian Kruse
* Rename 'gmake' to 'make' in docs and recommended commandsBruce Momjian2014-02-12
| | | | This simplifies the docs and makes it easier to cut/paste command lines.
* Fix unsafe references to errno within error messaging logic.Tom Lane2014-01-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Various places were supposing that errno could be expected to hold still within an ereport() nest or similar contexts. This isn't true necessarily, though in some cases it accidentally failed to fail depending on how the compiler chanced to order the subexpressions. This class of thinko explains recent reports of odd failures on clang-built versions, typically missing or inappropriate HINT fields in messages. Problem identified by Christian Kruse, who also submitted the patch this commit is based on. (I fixed a few issues in his patch and found a couple of additional places with the same disease.) Back-patch as appropriate to all supported branches.
* Fix thinko in huge_tlb_pages patch.Heikki Linnakangas2014-01-29
| | | | | | | | We calculated the rounded-up size for the allocation, but then failed to use the rounded-up value in the mmap() call. Oops. Also, initialize allocsize, to silence warnings seen with some compilers, as pointed out by Jeff Janes.
* Allow using huge TLB pages on Linux (MAP_HUGETLB)Heikki Linnakangas2014-01-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds an option, huge_tlb_pages, which allows requesting the shared memory segment to be allocated using huge pages, by using the MAP_HUGETLB flag in mmap(). This can improve performance. The default is 'try', which means that we will attempt using huge pages, and fall back to non-huge pages if it doesn't work. Currently, only Linux has MAP_HUGETLB. On other platforms, the default 'try' behaves the same as 'off'. In the passing, don't try to round the mmap() size to a multiple of pagesize. mmap() doesn't require that, and there's no particular reason for PostgreSQL to do that either. When using MAP_HUGETLB, however, round the request size up to nearest 2MB boundary. This is to work around a bug in some Linux kernel versions, but also to avoid wasting memory, because the kernel will round the size up anyway. Many people were involved in writing this patch, including Christian Kruse, Richard Poole, Abhijit Menon-Sen, reviewed by Peter Geoghegan, Andres Freund and me.
* Allow use of "z" flag in our printf calls, and use it where appropriate.Tom Lane2014-01-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since C99, it's been standard for printf and friends to accept a "z" size modifier, meaning "whatever size size_t has". Up to now we've generally dealt with printing size_t values by explicitly casting them to unsigned long and using the "l" modifier; but this is really the wrong thing on platforms where pointers are wider than longs (such as Win64). So let's start using "z" instead. To ensure we can do that on all platforms, teach src/port/snprintf.c to understand "z", and add a configure test to force use of that implementation when the platform's version doesn't handle "z". Having done that, modify a bunch of places that were using the unsigned-long hack to use "z" instead. This patch doesn't pretend to have gotten everyplace that could benefit, but it catches many of them. I made an effort in particular to ensure that all uses of the same error message text were updated together, so as not to increase the number of translatable strings. It's possible that this change will result in format-string warnings from pre-C99 compilers. We might have to reconsider if there are any popular compilers that will warn about this; but let's start by seeing what the buildfarm thinks. Andres Freund, with a little additional work by me
* Update copyright for 2014Bruce Momjian2014-01-07
| | | | | Update all files in head, and files COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml in all back branches.
* Remove IRIX port.Robert Haas2013-10-18
| | | | | | | Development of IRIX has been discontinued, and support is scheduled to end in December of 2013. Therefore, there will be no supported versions of this operating system by the time PostgreSQL 9.4 is released. Furthermore, we have no maintainer for this platform.
* Allow dynamic allocation of shared memory segments.Robert Haas2013-10-09
| | | | | Patch by myself and Amit Kapila. Design help from Noah Misch. Review by Andres Freund.
* Message style improvementsPeter Eisentraut2013-08-07
|
* Use SA_RESTART for all signals, including SIGALRM.Tom Lane2013-06-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The exclusion of SIGALRM dates back to Berkeley days, when Postgres used SIGALRM in only one very short stretch of code. Nowadays, allowing it to interrupt kernel calls doesn't seem like a very good idea, since its use for statement_timeout means SIGALRM could occur anyplace in the code, and there are far too many call sites where we aren't prepared to deal with EINTR failures. When third-party code is taken into consideration, it seems impossible that we ever could be fully EINTR-proof, so better to use SA_RESTART always and deal with the implications of that. One such implication is that we should not assume pg_usleep() will be terminated early by a signal. Therefore, long sleeps should probably be replaced by WaitLatch operations where practical. Back-patch to 9.3 so we can get some beta testing on this change.
* pgindent run for release 9.3Bruce Momjian2013-05-29
| | | | | This is the first run of the Perl-based pgindent script. Also update pgindent instructions.
* Move pqsignal() to libpgport.Tom Lane2013-03-17
| | | | | | | | | We had two copies of this function in the backend and libpq, which was already pretty bogus, but it turns out that we need it in some other programs that don't use libpq (such as pg_test_fsync). So put it where it probably should have been all along. The signal-mask-initialization support in src/backend/libpq/pqsignal.c stays where it is, though, since we only need that in the backend.
* Update copyrights for 2013Bruce Momjian2013-01-01
| | | | | Fully update git head, and update back branches in ./COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml files.
* Change test ExceptionalCondition to return voidAlvaro Herrera2012-11-30
| | | | Commit 81107282a changed it in assert.c, but overlooked this other file.
* Assert that WaitLatch's timeout is not more than INT_MAX milliseconds.Tom Lane2012-11-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | The behavior with larger values is unspecified by the Single Unix Spec. It appears that BSD-derived kernels report EINVAL, although Linux does not. If waiting for longer intervals is desired, the calling code has to do something to limit the delay; we can't portably fix it here since "long" may not be any wider than "int" in the first place. Part of response to bug #7670, though this change doesn't fix that (in fact, it converts the problem from an ERROR into an Assert failure). No back-patch since it's just an assertion addition.
* Fix WaitLatch() to return promptly when the requested timeout expires.Tom Lane2012-11-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the sleep is interrupted by a signal, we must recompute the remaining time to wait; otherwise, a steady stream of non-wait-terminating interrupts could delay return from WaitLatch indefinitely. This has been shown to be a problem for the autovacuum launcher, and there may well be other places now or in the future with similar issues. So we'd better make the function robust, even though this'll add at least one gettimeofday call per wait. Back-patch to 9.2. We might eventually need to fix 9.1 as well, but the code is quite different there, and the usage of WaitLatch in 9.1 is so limited that it's not clearly important to do so. Reported and diagnosed by Jeff Janes, though I rewrote his patch rather heavily.