| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This coding pattern creates a race condition, because if an interesting
interrupt happens after we've checked InterruptPending but before we reset
our latch, the latch-setting done by the signal handler would get lost,
and then we might block at WaitLatch in the next iteration without ever
noticing the interrupt condition. You can put the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
before WaitLatch or after ResetLatch, but not between them.
Aside from fixing the bugs, add some explanatory comments to latch.h
to perhaps forestall the next person from making the same mistake.
In HEAD, also replace gather_readnext's direct call of
HandleParallelMessages with CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS. It does not seem clean
or useful for this one caller to bypass ProcessInterrupts and go straight
to HandleParallelMessages; not least because that fails to consider the
InterruptPending flag, resulting in useless work both here
(if InterruptPending isn't set) and in the next CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS call
(if it is).
This thinko seems to have been introduced in the initial coding of
storage/ipc/shm_mq.c (commit ec9037df2), and then blindly copied into all
the subsequent parallel-query support logic. Back-patch relevant hunks
to 9.4 to extirpate the error everywhere.
Discussion: <1661.1469996911@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 88cf37d2a86d5b66380003d7c3384530e3f91e40 as well
as follow-on commits ea9c4a16d5ad88a1d28d43ef458e3209b53eb106 and
c57562725d219c4249b82f4a4fb5aaeee3ae0d53. We've learned about as much
as we can from the buildfarm.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Examination of the results from anole and gharial suggests that we're
only managing to track the size of one of the two stacks of IA64 machines.
Some googling gave the answer: on HPUX11, the register stack is reported
as a page type I don't see in pstat.h on my HPUX10 box. Let's try
testing for that.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After a look at preliminary results from commit 88cf37d2a86d5b66,
I realized it'd be a good idea to spew out the maximum depth measurement
seen by check_stack_depth. So add some quick-n-dirty code to do that.
Like the previous commit, this will be reverted once we've gathered
a set of buildfarm runs with it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch is meant to gather information from the buildfarm members, and
will be reverted in a day or so. The idea is to try to find out the
high-water stack consumption while running the regression tests,
particularly on IA64 which is suspected to use much more stack than other
architectures. On machines with pmap, we can use that; but the IA64 farm
members are running HPUX, so also include some bespoke code for HPUX.
(I've tested the latter on HPUX 10/HPPA; not entirely sure it will work
on HPUX 11/IA64, but we'll soon find out.)
Discussion: <CAM-w4HMwwcwaVvYcAH0_FGtG5GeXdYVRfvG81pXnSJWHnCfosQ@mail.gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 3bd261ca18c67eafe18088e58fab511e3b965418 should have updated
this, but didn't.
Extracted from a larger patch by Piotr Stefaniak.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prior to this patch, it was occasionally possible, after shm_mq_sendv
had previously returned SHM_MQ_DETACHED, for a later shm_mq_sendv
operation to fail an assertion instead of just again returning
SHM_MQ_ATTACHED. From the shm_mq code's point of view, it was
expecting to be called again with the same arguments, since the
previous operation had only partially completed. However, a caller
who isn't using non-blocking mode won't be prepared to repeat the call
with the same arguments, and this code shouldn't expect that they
will. Repair in such a way that we'll be OK whether the next call
uses the same arguments or not.
Found by Andreas Seltenreich. Analysis and sketch of fix by Amit
Kapila. Patch by me, reviewed by Amit Kapila.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mostly these are just comments but there are a few in documentation
and a handful in code and tests. Hopefully this doesn't cause too much
unnecessary pain for backpatching. I relented from some of the most
common like "thru" for that reason. The rest don't seem numerous
enough to cause problems.
Thanks to Kevin Lyda's tool https://pypi.python.org/pypi/misspellings
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use MAXALIGN size/alignment to guarantee that later uses of memory are
aligned correctly. E.g. epoll_event might need 8 byte alignment on some
platforms, but earlier allocations like WaitEventSet and WaitEvent might
not sized to guarantee that when purely using sizeof().
Found by myself while testing on an Sun Ultra 5 (Sparc IIi) with some
editorializing by Andres Freund.
In passing fix a couple typos in the area
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So far, when a transaction with pending invalidations, but without an
assigned xid, committed, we simply ignored those invalidation
messages. That's problematic, because those are actually sent for a
reason.
Known symptoms of this include that existing sessions on a hot-standby
replica sometimes fail to notice new concurrently built indexes and
visibility map updates.
The solution is to WAL log such invalidations in transactions without an
xid. We considered to alternatively force-assign an xid, but that'd be
problematic for vacuum, which might be run in systems with few xids.
Important: This adds a new WAL record, but as the patch has to be
back-patched, we can't bump the WAL page magic. This means that standbys
have to be updated before primaries; otherwise
"PANIC: standby_redo: unknown op code 32" errors can be encountered.
XXX:
Reported-By: Васильев Дмитрий, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion:
CAB-SwXY6oH=9twBkXJtgR4UC1NqT-vpYAtxCseME62ADwyK5OA@mail.gmail.com
CAD21AoDpZ6Xjg=gFrGPnSn4oTRRcwK1EBrWCq9OqOHuAcMMC=w@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
That commit increased all shared memory allocations to the next higher
multiple of PG_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, but it didn't ensure that allocation
started on a cache line boundary. It also failed to remove a couple
other pieces of now-useless code.
BUFFERALIGN() is perhaps obsolete at this point, and likely should be
removed at some point, too, but that seems like it can be left to a
future cleanup.
Mistakes all pointed out by Andres Freund. The patch is mine, with
a few extra assertions which I adopted from his version of this fix.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On a big NUMA machine with 1000 connections in saturation load
there was a performance regression due to spinlock contention, for
acquiring values which were never used. Just fill with dummy
values if we're not going to use them.
This patch has not been benchmarked yet on a big NUMA machine, but
it seems like a good idea on general principle, and it seemed to
prevent an apparent 2.2% regression on a single-socket i7 box
running 200 connections at saturation load.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This feature is controlled by a new old_snapshot_threshold GUC. A
value of -1 disables the feature, and that is the default. The
value of 0 is just intended for testing. Above that it is the
number of minutes a snapshot can reach before pruning and vacuum
are allowed to remove dead tuples which the snapshot would
otherwise protect. The xmin associated with a transaction ID does
still protect dead tuples. A connection which is using an "old"
snapshot does not get an error unless it accesses a page modified
recently enough that it might not be able to produce accurate
results.
This is similar to the Oracle feature, and we use the same SQLSTATE
and error message for compatibility.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Remove recent changes to logging XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS by request.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Experimentation shows this only costs about 6kB, which seems well
worth it given the major performance effects that can be caused
by insufficient alignment, especially on larger systems.
Discussion: 14166.1458924422@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If archive_timeout > 0 we should avoid logging XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS if idle.
Bug 13685 reported by Laurence Rowe, investigated in detail by Michael Paquier,
though this is not his proposed fix.
20151016203031.3019.72930@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Simple non-invasive patch to allow later backpatch to 9.4 and 9.5
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The inconsistency here triggered compiler warnings on some buildfarm
members, and it's surely pretty pointless.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Thomas Munro
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit ac1d794 ("Make idle backends exit if the postmaster dies.")
introduced a regression on, at least, large linux systems. Constantly
adding the same postmaster_alive_fds to the OSs internal datastructures
for implementing poll/select can cause significant contention; leading
to a performance regression of nearly 3x in one example.
This can be avoided by using e.g. linux' epoll, which avoids having to
add/remove file descriptors to the wait datastructures at a high rate.
Unfortunately the current latch interface makes it hard to allocate any
persistent per-backend resources.
Replace, with a backward compatibility layer, WaitLatchOrSocket with a
new WaitEventSet API. Users can allocate such a Set across multiple
calls, and add more than one file-descriptor to wait on. The latter has
been added because there's upcoming postgres features where that will be
helpful.
In addition to the previously existing poll(2), select(2),
WaitForMultipleObjects() implementations also provide an epoll_wait(2)
based implementation to address the aforementioned performance
problem. Epoll is only available on linux, but that is the most likely
OS for machines large enough (four sockets) to reproduce the problem.
To actually address the aforementioned regression, create and use a
long-lived WaitEventSet for FE/BE communication. There are additional
places that would benefit from a long-lived set, but that's a task for
another day.
Thanks to Amit Kapila, who helped make the windows code I blindly wrote
actually work.
Reported-By: Dmitry Vasilyev Discussion:
CAB-SwXZh44_2ybvS5Z67p_CDz=XFn4hNAD=CnMEF+QqkXwFrGg@mail.gmail.com
20160114143931.GG10941@awork2.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously latches for windows and unix had been implemented in
different files. A later patch introduce an expanded wait
infrastructure, keeping the implementation separate would introduce too
much duplication.
This basically just moves the functions, without too much change. The
reason to keep this separate is that it allows blame to continue working
a little less badly; and to make review a tiny bit easier.
Discussion: 20160114143931.GG10941@awork2.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
| |
Oskari Saarenmaa
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Earlier version committed in 9.0 caused spurious waits in some cases.
New infrastructure for lock waits in 9.3 used to correct and improve this.
Jeff Janes based upon a proposal by Simon Riggs, who also reviewed
Additional review comments from Amit Kapila
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new bit indicates whether every tuple on the page is already frozen.
It is cleared only when the all-visible bit is cleared, and it can be
set only when we vacuum a page and find that every tuple on that page is
both visible to every transaction and in no need of any future
vacuuming.
A future commit will use this new bit to optimize away full-table scans
that would otherwise be triggered by XID wraparound considerations. A
page which is merely all-visible must still be scanned in that case, but
a page which is all-frozen need not be. This commit does not attempt
that optimization, although that optimization is the goal here. It
seems better to get the basic infrastructure in place first.
Per discussion, it's very desirable for pg_upgrade to automatically
migrate existing VM forks from the old format to the new format. That,
too, will be handled in a follow-on patch.
Masahiko Sawada, reviewed by Kyotaro Horiguchi, Fujii Masao, Amit
Kapila, Simon Riggs, Andres Freund, and others, and substantially
revised by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch introduces "pg_blocking_pids(int) returns int[]", which returns
the PIDs of any sessions that are blocking the session with the given PID.
Historically people have obtained such information using a self-join on
the pg_locks view, but it's unreasonably tedious to do it that way with any
modicum of correctness, and the addition of parallel queries has pretty
much broken that approach altogether. (Given some more columns in the view
than there are today, you could imagine handling parallel-query cases with
a 4-way join; but ugh.)
The new function has the following behaviors that are painful or impossible
to get right via pg_locks:
1. Correctly understands which lock modes block which other ones.
2. In soft-block situations (two processes both waiting for conflicting lock
modes), only the one that's in front in the wait queue is reported to
block the other.
3. In parallel-query cases, reports all sessions blocking any member of
the given PID's lock group, and reports a session by naming its leader
process's PID, which will be the pg_backend_pid() value visible to
clients.
The motivation for doing this right now is mostly to fix the isolation
tests. Commit 38f8bdcac4982215beb9f65a19debecaf22fd470 lobotomized
isolationtester's is-it-waiting query by removing its ability to recognize
nonconflicting lock modes, as a crude workaround for the inability to
handle soft-block situations properly. But even without the lock mode
tests, the old query was excessively slow, particularly in
CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS builds; some of our buildfarm animals fail the new
deadlock-hard test because the deadlock timeout elapses before they can
probe the waiting status of all eight sessions. Replacing the pg_locks
self-join with use of pg_blocking_pids() is not only much more correct, but
a lot faster: I measure it at about 9X faster in a typical dev build with
Asserts, and 3X faster in CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS builds. That should provide
enough headroom for the slower CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS animals to pass the
test, without having to lengthen deadlock_timeout yet more and thus slow
down the test for everyone else.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 0e141c0fbb211bdd23783afa731e3eef95c9ad7a introduced a new
facility to reduce ProcArrayLock contention by clearing several XIDs
from the ProcArray under a single lock acquisition. The names
initially chosen were deemed not to be very good choices, so commit
4aec49899e5782247e134f94ce1c6ee926f88e1c renamed them. But now it
seems like we still didn't get it right. A pending patch wants to
add similar infrastructure for batching CLOG updates, so the names
need to be clear enough to allow a new set of structure members with
a related purpose.
Amit Kapila
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 3971f64843b02e4a55d854156bd53e46a0588e45 and a
couple of followon debugging commits; I think we've learned what we can
from them.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Further investigation says that there may be some slow operations after
we've finished ShutdownXLOG(), so add some more log messages to try to
isolate that. This is all temporary code too.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, each PGPROC's backendLock was part of the main tranche,
and the PGPROC just contained a pointer. Now, the actual LWLock is
part of the PGPROC.
As with previous, similar patches, this makes it significantly easier
to identify these lwlocks in LWLOCK_STATS or Trace_lwlocks output
and improves modularity.
Author: Ildus Kurbangaliev
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Robert Haas
|
| |
|
|
| |
We use Share lock because it is safe to do so.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Backpatch certain files through 9.1
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit a1480ec1d3bacb9acb08ec09f22bc25bc033115b purported to fix the
problems with commit b2ccb5f4e6c81305386edb34daf7d1d1e1ee112a, but it
didn't completely fix them. The problem is that the checks were
performed in the wrong order, leading to a race condition. If the
sender attached, sent a message, and detached after the receiver
called shm_mq_get_sender and before the receiver called
shm_mq_counterparty_gone, we'd incorrectly return SHM_MQ_DETACHED
before all messages were read. Repair by reversing the order of
operations, and add a long comment explaining why this new logic is
(hopefully) correct.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
If the counterparty writes some data into the queue and then detaches,
it's wrong to return SHM_MQ_DETACHED right away. If we do that, we
fail to read whatever was written.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The shm_mq mechanism was intended to optionally notice when the process
on the other end of the queue fails to attach to the queue. It does
this by allowing the user to pass a BackgroundWorkerHandle; if the
background worker in question is launched and dies without attaching
to the queue, then we know it never will. This logic works OK in
blocking mode, but when called with nowait = true we fail to notice
that this has happened due to an asymmetry in the logic. Repair.
Reported off-list by Rushabh Lathia. Patch by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prior to commit 0709b7ee72e4bc71ad07b7120acd117265ab51d0, access to
variables within a spinlock-protected critical section had to be done
through a volatile pointer, but that should no longer be necessary.
Michael Paquier
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prior to commit 0709b7ee72e4bc71ad07b7120acd117265ab51d0, access to
variables within a spinlock-protected critical section had to be done
through a volatile pointer, but that should no longer be necessary.
Thomas Munro
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This flag has proven to be a recipe for bugs, and it doesn't seem like
it can really buy anything in terms of performance. So let's just
*always* set the process latch when we receive SIGUSR1 instead of
trying to do it only when needed.
Per my recent proposal on pgsql-hackers.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The shm_mq mechanism was built to send error (and notice) messages and
tuples between backends. However, shm_mq itself only deals in raw
bytes. Since commit 2bd9e412f92bc6a68f3e8bcb18e04955cc35001d, we have
had infrastructure for one message to redirect protocol messages to a
queue and for another backend to parse them and do useful things with
them. This commit introduces a somewhat analogous facility for tuples
by adding a new type of DestReceiver, DestTupleQueue, which writes
each tuple generated by a query into a shm_mq, and a new
TupleQueueFunnel facility which reads raw tuples out of the queue and
reconstructs the HeapTuple format expected by the executor.
The TupleQueueFunnel abstraction supports reading from multiple tuple
streams at the same time, but only in round-robin fashion. Someone
could imaginably want other policies, but this should be good enough
to meet our short-term needs related to parallel query, and we can
always extend it later.
This also makes one minor addition to the shm_mq API that didn'
seem worth breaking out as a separate patch.
Extracted from Amit Kapila's parallel sequential scan patch. This
code was originally written by me, and then it was revised by Amit,
and then it was revised some more by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post-commit review by Andres Freund discovered a couple of concurrency
bugs in the original patch: specifically, if the leader cleared a
follower's XID before it reached PGSemaphoreLock, the semaphore would be
left in the wrong state; and if another process did PGSemaphoreUnlock
for some unrelated reason, we might resume execution before the fact
that our XID was cleared was globally visible.
Also, improve the wording of some comments, rename nextClearXidElem
to firstClearXidElem in PROC_HDR for clarity, and drop some volatile
qualifiers that aren't necessary.
Amit Kapila, reviewed and slightly revised by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a bunch of somewhat pedantic warnings with new
compilers. Since by far the majority of other functions definitions use
the (void) style it just seems to be consistent to do so as well in the
remaining few places.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Spotted by Antonin Houska.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If some, but not all, of the length word has already been read, and the
next attempt to read sees exactly the number of bytes needed to complete
the length word, or fewer, then we'll incorrectly read less than all of
the available data.
Antonin Houska
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a write transaction commits, it must clear its XID advertised via
the ProcArray, which requires that we hold ProcArrayLock in exclusive
mode in order to prevent concurrent processes running GetSnapshotData
from seeing inconsistent results. When many processes try to commit
at once, ProcArrayLock must change hands repeatedly, with each
concurrent process trying to commit waking up to acquire the lock in
turn. To make things more efficient, when more than one backend is
trying to commit a write transaction at the same time, have just one
of them acquire ProcArrayLock in exclusive mode and clear the XIDs of
all processes in the group. Benchmarking reveals that this is much
more efficient at very high client counts.
Amit Kapila, heavily revised by me, with some review also from Pavan
Deolasee.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Patch by CharSyam, plus a few more I spotted with grep.
|
