aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/utils/adt/domains.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Adjust populate_record_field() to handle errors softlyAmit Langote2024-01-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This adds a Node *escontext parameter to it and a bunch of functions downstream to it, replacing any ereport()s in that path by either errsave() or ereturn() as appropriate. This also adds code to those functions where necessary to return early upon encountering a soft error. The changes here are mainly intended to suppress errors in the functions of jsonfuncs.c. Functions in any external modules, such as arrayfuncs.c, that those functions may in turn call are not changed here based on the assumption that the various checks in jsonfuncs.c functions should ensure that only values that are structurally valid get passed to the functions in those external modules. An exception is made for domain_check() to allow handling domain constraint violation errors softly. For testing, this adds a function jsonb_populate_record_valid(), which returns true if jsonb_populate_record() would finish without causing an error for the provided JSON object, false otherwise. Note that jsonb_populate_record() internally calls populate_record(), which in turn uses populate_record_field(). Extracted from a much larger patch to add SQL/JSON query functions. Author: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> Author: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> Author: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com> Author: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> Author: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby, Álvaro Herrera, Jian He, Peter Eisentraut Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220616233130.rparivafipt6doj3@alap3.anarazel.de Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/abd9b83b-aa66-f230-3d6d-734817f0995d%40postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqHROpf9e644D8BRqYvaAPmgBZVup-xKMDPk-nd4EpgzHw@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqE4XTdfb1nW=Ojoy_tQSRhYt-q_kb6i5d4xcKyrLC1Nbg@mail.gmail.com
* Update copyright for 2024Bruce Momjian2024-01-03
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 12
* Update copyright for 2023Bruce Momjian2023-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: 11
* Remove new locale dependency in regproc regression test.Tom Lane2022-12-27
| | | | | | | | | | | The modified error message for regcollationin failure includes the database encoding, which it should've occurred to me is a portability hazard for the regression tests. Adjust the test so the expected output doesn't include that. In passing, fix a comment typo introduced in b8c0ffbd2. Per buildfarm.
* Convert domain_in to report errors softly.Tom Lane2022-12-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This is straightforward as far as it goes. However, it does not attempt to trap errors occurring during the execution of domain CHECK constraints. Since those are general user-defined expressions, the only way to do that would involve starting up a subtransaction for each check. Of course the entire point of the soft-errors feature is to not need subtransactions, so that would be self-defeating. For now, we'll rely on the assumption that domain checks are written to avoid throwing errors. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1181028.1670635727@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Update copyright for 2022Bruce Momjian2022-01-07
| | | | Backpatch-through: 10
* Update copyright for 2021Bruce Momjian2021-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Update copyrights for 2020Bruce Momjian2020-01-01
| | | | Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
* Update copyright for 2019Bruce Momjian2019-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.4
* Update copyright for 2018Bruce Momjian2018-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.3
* Support domains over composite types.Tom Lane2017-10-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is the last major omission in our domains feature: you can now make a domain over anything that's not a pseudotype. The major complication from an implementation standpoint is that places that might be creating tuples of a domain type now need to be prepared to apply domain_check(). It seems better that unprepared code fail with an error like "<type> is not composite" than that it silently fail to apply domain constraints. Therefore, relevant infrastructure like get_func_result_type() and lookup_rowtype_tupdesc() has been adjusted to treat domain-over-composite as a distinct case that unprepared code won't recognize, rather than just transparently treating it the same as plain composite. This isn't a 100% solution to the possibility of overlooked domain checks, but it catches most places. In passing, improve typcache.c's support for domains (it can now cache the identity of a domain's base type), and rewrite the argument handling logic in jsonfuncs.c's populate_record[set]_worker to reduce duplicative per-call lookups. I believe this is code-complete so far as the core and contrib code go. The PLs need varying amounts of work, which will be tackled in followup patches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4206.1499798337@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Phase 3 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they flow past the right margin. By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin, then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin, if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column limit. This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers. Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Faster expression evaluation and targetlist projection.Andres Freund2017-03-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This replaces the old, recursive tree-walk based evaluation, with non-recursive, opcode dispatch based, expression evaluation. Projection is now implemented as part of expression evaluation. This both leads to significant performance improvements, and makes future just-in-time compilation of expressions easier. The speed gains primarily come from: - non-recursive implementation reduces stack usage / overhead - simple sub-expressions are implemented with a single jump, without function calls - sharing some state between different sub-expressions - reduced amount of indirect/hard to predict memory accesses by laying out operation metadata sequentially; including the avoidance of nearly all of the previously used linked lists - more code has been moved to expression initialization, avoiding constant re-checks at evaluation time Future just-in-time compilation (JIT) has become easier, as demonstrated by released patches intended to be merged in a later release, for primarily two reasons: Firstly, due to a stricter split between expression initialization and evaluation, less code has to be handled by the JIT. Secondly, due to the non-recursive nature of the generated "instructions", less performance-critical code-paths can easily be shared between interpreted and compiled evaluation. The new framework allows for significant future optimizations. E.g.: - basic infrastructure for to later reduce the per executor-startup overhead of expression evaluation, by caching state in prepared statements. That'd be helpful in OLTPish scenarios where initialization overhead is measurable. - optimizing the generated "code". A number of proposals for potential work has already been made. - optimizing the interpreter. Similarly a number of proposals have been made here too. The move of logic into the expression initialization step leads to some backward-incompatible changes: - Function permission checks are now done during expression initialization, whereas previously they were done during execution. In edge cases this can lead to errors being raised that previously wouldn't have been, e.g. a NULL array being coerced to a different array type previously didn't perform checks. - The set of domain constraints to be checked, is now evaluated once during expression initialization, previously it was re-built every time a domain check was evaluated. For normal queries this doesn't change much, but e.g. for plpgsql functions, which caches ExprStates, the old set could stick around longer. The behavior around might still change. Author: Andres Freund, with significant changes by Tom Lane, changes by Heikki Linnakangas Reviewed-By: Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161206034955.bh33paeralxbtluv@alap3.anarazel.de
* Remove obsoleted code relating to targetlist SRF evaluation.Andres Freund2017-01-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Since 69f4b9c plain expression evaluation (and thus normal projection) can't return sets of tuples anymore. Thus remove code dealing with that possibility. This will require adjustments in external code using ExecEvalExpr()/ExecProject() - that should neither be hard nor very common. Author: Andres Freund and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20160822214023.aaxz5l4igypowyri@alap3.anarazel.de
* Update copyright via script for 2017Bruce Momjian2017-01-03
|
* Fix handling of expanded objects in CoerceToDomain and CASE execution.Tom Lane2016-12-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When the input value to a CoerceToDomain expression node is a read-write expanded datum, we should pass a read-only pointer to any domain CHECK expressions and then return the original read-write pointer as the expression result. Previously we were blindly passing the same pointer to all the consumers of the value, making it possible for a function in CHECK to modify or even delete the expanded value. (Since a plpgsql function will absorb a passed-in read-write expanded array as a local variable value, it will in fact delete the value on exit.) A similar hazard of passing the same read-write pointer to multiple consumers exists in domain_check() and in ExecEvalCase, so fix those too. The fix requires adding MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly calls at the appropriate places, which is simple enough except that we need to get the data type's typlen from somewhere. For the domain cases, solve this by redefining DomainConstraintRef.tcache as okay for callers to access; there wasn't any reason for the original convention against that, other than not wanting the API of typcache.c to be any wider than it had to be. For CASE, there's no good solution except to add a syscache lookup during executor start. Per bug #14472 from Marcos Castedo. Back-patch to 9.5 where expanded values were introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15225.1482431619@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Avoid reporting "cache lookup failed" for some user-reachable cases.Tom Lane2016-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We have a not-terribly-thoroughly-enforced-yet project policy that internal errors with SQLSTATE XX000 (ie, plain elog) should not be triggerable from SQL. record_in, domain_in, and PL validator functions all failed to meet this standard, because they threw plain elog("cache lookup failed for XXX") errors on bad OIDs, and those are all invokable from SQL. For record_in, the best fix is to upgrade typcache.c (lookup_type_cache) to throw a user-facing error for this case. That seems consistent because it was more than halfway there already, having user-facing errors for shell types and non-composite types. Having done that, tweak domain_in to rely on the typcache to throw an appropriate error. (This costs little because InitDomainConstraintRef would fetch the typcache entry anyway.) For the PL validator functions, we already have a single choke point at CheckFunctionValidatorAccess, so just fix its error to be user-facing. Dilip Kumar, reviewed by Haribabu Kommi Discussion: <87wpxfygg9.fsf@credativ.de>
* Update copyright for 2016Bruce Momjian2016-01-02
| | | | Backpatch certain files through 9.1
* Use the typcache to cache constraints for domain types.Tom Lane2015-03-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, we cached domain constraints for the life of a query, or really for the life of the FmgrInfo struct that was used to invoke domain_in() or domain_check(). But plpgsql (and probably other places) are set up to cache such FmgrInfos for the whole lifespan of a session, which meant they could be enforcing really stale sets of constraints. On the other hand, searching pg_constraint once per query gets kind of expensive too: testing says that as much as half the runtime of a trivial query such as "SELECT 0::domaintype" went into that. To fix this, delegate the responsibility for tracking a domain's constraints to the typcache, which has the infrastructure needed to detect syscache invalidation events that signal possible changes. This not only removes unnecessary repeat reads of pg_constraint, but ensures that we never apply stale constraint data: whatever we use is the current data according to syscache rules. Unfortunately, the current configuration of the system catalogs means we have to flush cached domain-constraint data whenever either pg_type or pg_constraint changes, which happens rather a lot (eg, creation or deletion of a temp table will do it). It might be worth rearranging things to split pg_constraint into two catalogs, of which the domain constraint one would probably be very low-traffic. That's a job for another patch though, and in any case this patch should improve matters materially even with that handicap. This patch makes use of the recently-added memory context reset callback feature to manage the lifespan of domain constraint caches, so that we don't risk deleting a cache that might be in the midst of evaluation. Although this is a bug fix as well as a performance improvement, no back-patch. There haven't been many if any field complaints about stale domain constraint checks, so it doesn't seem worth taking the risk of modifying data structures as basic as MemoryContexts in back branches.
* Update copyright for 2015Bruce Momjian2015-01-06
| | | | Backpatch certain files through 9.0
* pgindent run for 9.4Bruce Momjian2014-05-06
| | | | | This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.
* Update copyright for 2014Bruce Momjian2014-01-07
| | | | | Update all files in head, and files COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml in all back branches.
* Provide database object names as separate fields in error messages.Tom Lane2013-01-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch addresses the problem that applications currently have to extract object names from possibly-localized textual error messages, if they want to know for example which index caused a UNIQUE_VIOLATION failure. It adds new error message fields to the wire protocol, which can carry the name of a table, table column, data type, or constraint associated with the error. (Since the protocol spec has always instructed clients to ignore unrecognized field types, this should not create any compatibility problem.) Support for providing these new fields has been added to just a limited set of error reports (mainly, those in the "integrity constraint violation" SQLSTATE class), but we will doubtless add them to more calls in future. Pavel Stehule, reviewed and extensively revised by Peter Geoghegan, with additional hacking by Tom Lane.
* Update copyrights for 2013Bruce Momjian2013-01-01
| | | | | Fully update git head, and update back branches in ./COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml files.
* Split heapam_xlog.h from heapam.hAlvaro Herrera2012-08-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | The heapam XLog functions are used by other modules, not all of which are interested in the rest of the heapam API. With this, we let them get just the XLog stuff in which they are interested and not pollute them with unrelated includes. Also, since heapam.h no longer requires xlog.h, many files that do include heapam.h no longer get xlog.h automatically, including a few headers. This is useful because heapam.h is getting pulled in by execnodes.h, which is in turn included by a lot of files.
* Update copyright notices for year 2012.Bruce Momjian2012-01-01
|
* Remove unnecessary #include references, per pgrminclude script.Bruce Momjian2011-09-01
|
* Stamp copyrights for year 2011.Bruce Momjian2011-01-01
|
* Remove cvs keywords from all files.Magnus Hagander2010-09-20
|
* pgindent run for 9.0Bruce Momjian2010-02-26
|
* Update copyright for the year 2010.Bruce Momjian2010-01-02
|
* Fix/improve bytea and boolean support in PL/PythonPeter Eisentraut2009-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Before, PL/Python converted data between SQL and Python by going through a C string representation. This broke for bytea in two ways: - On input (function parameters), you would get a Python string that contains bytea's particular external representation with backslashes etc., instead of a sequence of bytes, which is what you would expect in a Python environment. This problem is exacerbated by the new bytea output format. - On output (function return value), null bytes in the Python string would cause truncation before the data gets stored into a bytea datum. This is now fixed by converting directly between the PostgreSQL datum and the Python representation. The required generalized infrastructure also allows for other improvements in passing: - When returning a boolean value, the SQL datum is now true if and only if Python considers the value that was passed out of the PL/Python function to be true. Previously, this determination was left to the boolean data type input function. So, now returning 'foo' results in true, because Python considers it true, rather than false because PostgreSQL considers it false. - On input, we can convert the integer and float types directly to their Python equivalents without having to go through an intermediate string representation. original patch by Caleb Welton, with updates by myself
* Update copyright for 2009.Bruce Momjian2009-01-01
|
* Change xlog.h to xlogdefs.h in bufpage.h, and fix fallout.Alvaro Herrera2008-06-06
|
* Update copyrights in source tree to 2008.Bruce Momjian2008-01-01
|
* Update CVS HEAD for 2007 copyright. Back branches are typically notBruce Momjian2007-01-05
| | | | back-stamped for this.
* pgindent run for 8.2.Bruce Momjian2006-10-04
|
* Fix domain_in() bug exhibited by Darcy Buskermolen. The idea of an EStateTom Lane2006-08-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | that's shorter-lived than the expression state being evaluated in it really doesn't work :-( --- we end up with fn_extra caches getting deleted while still in use. Rather than abandon the notion of caching expression state across domain_in calls altogether, I chose to make domain_in a bit cozier with ExprContext. All we really need for evaluating variable-free expressions is an ExprContext, not an EState, so I invented the notion of a "standalone" ExprContext. domain_in can prevent resource leakages by doing a ReScanExprContext on this rather than having to free it entirely; so we can make the ExprContext have the same lifespan (and particularly the same per_query memory context) as the expression state structs.
* Remove 576 references of include files that were not needed.Bruce Momjian2006-07-14
|
* Fix a bunch of problems with domains by making them use special input functionsTom Lane2006-04-05
that apply the necessary domain constraint checks immediately. This fixes cases where domain constraints went unchecked for statement parameters, PL function local variables and results, etc. We can also eliminate existing special cases for domains in places that had gotten it right, eg COPY. Also, allow domains over domains (base of a domain is another domain type). This almost worked before, but was disallowed because the original patch hadn't gotten it quite right.