aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/utils
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* interval: round values when spilling to monthsBruce Momjian2021-08-03
| | | | | | | | | | | Previously spilled units greater than months were truncated to months. Also document the spill behavior. Reported-by: Bryn Llewelly Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/BDAE4B56-3337-45A2-AC8A-30593849D6C0@yugabyte.com Backpatch-through: master
* Fix corner-case errors and loss of precision in numeric_power().Dean Rasheed2021-07-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This fixes a couple of related problems that arise when raising numbers to very large powers. Firstly, when raising a negative number to a very large integer power, the result should be well-defined, but the previous code would only cope if the exponent was small enough to go through power_var_int(). Otherwise it would throw an internal error, attempting to take the logarithm of a negative number. Fix this by adding suitable handling to the general case in power_var() to cope with negative bases, checking for integer powers there. Next, when raising a (positive or negative) number whose absolute value is slightly less than 1 to a very large power, the result should approach zero as the power is increased. However, in some cases, for sufficiently large powers, this would lose all precision and return 1 instead of 0. This was due to the way that the local_rscale was being calculated for the final full-precision calculation: local_rscale = rscale + (int) val - ln_dweight + 8 The first two terms on the right hand side are meant to give the number of significant digits required in the result ("val" being the estimated result weight). However, this failed to account for the fact that rscale is clipped to a maximum of NUMERIC_MAX_DISPLAY_SCALE (1000), and the result weight might be less then -1000, causing their sum to be negative, leading to a loss of precision. Fix this by forcing the number of significant digits calculated to be nonnegative. It's OK for it to be zero (when the result weight is less than -1000), since the local_rscale value then includes a few extra digits to ensure an accurate result. Finally, add additional underflow checks to exp_var() and power_var(), so that they consistently return zero for cases like this where the result is indistinguishable from zero. Some paths through this code already returned zero in such cases, but others were throwing overflow errors. Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Yugo Nagata. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCW6Dvq7+3wN3tt5jLj-FyOcUgT5xNoOqce5=6Su0bCR0w@mail.gmail.com
* Disallow negative strides in date_bin()John Naylor2021-07-28
| | | | | | | | | | | It's not clear what the semantics of negative strides would be, so throw an error instead. Per report from Bauyrzhan Sakhariyev Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKpL73vZmLuFVuwF26FJ%2BNk11PVHhAnQRoREFcA03x7znRoFvA%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch to v14
* Set pg_setting.pending_restart when pertinent config lines are removedAlvaro Herrera2021-07-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This changes the behavior of examining the pg_file_settings view after changing a config option that requires restart. The user needs to know that any change of such options does not take effect until a restart, and this worked correctly if the line is edited without removing it. However, for the case where the line is removed altogether, the flag doesn't get set, because a flag was only set in set_config_option, but that's not called for lines removed. Repair. (Ref.: commits 62d16c7fc561 and a486e35706ea) Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202107262302.xsfdfc5sb7sh@alvherre.pgsql
* Avoid using ambiguous word "non-negative" in error messages.Fujii Masao2021-07-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The error messages using the word "non-negative" are confusing because it's ambiguous about whether it accepts zero or not. This commit improves those error messages by replacing it with less ambiguous word like "greater than zero" or "greater than or equal to zero". Also this commit added the note about the word "non-negative" to the error message style guide, to help writing the new error messages. When postgres_fdw option fetch_size was set to zero, previously the error message "fetch_size requires a non-negative integer value" was reported. This error message was outright buggy. Therefore back-patch to all supported versions where such buggy error message could be thrown. Reported-by: Hou Zhijie Author: Bharath Rupireddy Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716415335A06B489F1B3A8194569@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
* Use the "pg_temp" schema alias in EXPLAIN and related output.Tom Lane2021-07-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch causes EXPLAIN output to refer to objects that are in the current session's temp schema with the "pg_temp" schema alias rather than that schema's actual name. This is useful for our own testing purposes since it will stabilize EXPLAIN VERBOSE output for such cases, allowing us to use that in regression tests. It should be less confusing for end users too. Since ruleutils.c needs to change behavior for this, the change also leaks into a few other users of ruleutils.c, for example pg_get_viewdef(). AFAICS that won't cause any problems. We did find that aggressively trying to change this behavior across-the-board would cause issues, but as long as "pg_temp" only appears within generated SQL text, I think it'll be fine. Along the way, make get_namespace_name_or_temp conform to the same API as get_namespace_name, ie that it returns a palloc'd string or NULL. The current behavior hasn't caused any bugs since no callers attempt to pfree the result, but if it gets more widespread usage that could become a problem. Amul Sul, reviewed and extended by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b97W=QaGmag9AhWNbmx3uEYsNkXWL+OVW1_E1D3BtgWvtw@mail.gmail.com
* Allow numeric scale to be negative or greater than precision.Dean Rasheed2021-07-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Formerly, when specifying NUMERIC(precision, scale), the scale had to be in the range [0, precision], which was per SQL spec. This commit extends the range of allowed scales to [-1000, 1000], independent of the precision (whose valid range remains [1, 1000]). A negative scale implies rounding before the decimal point. For example, a column might be declared with a scale of -3 to round values to the nearest thousand. Note that the display scale remains non-negative, so in this case the display scale will be zero, and all digits before the decimal point will be displayed. A scale greater than the precision supports fractional values with zeros immediately after the decimal point. Take the opportunity to tidy up the code that packs, unpacks and validates the contents of a typmod integer, encapsulating it in a small set of new inline functions. Bump the catversion because the allowed contents of atttypmod have changed for numeric columns. This isn't a change that requires a re-initdb, but negative scale values in the typmod would confuse old backends. Dean Rasheed, with additional improvements by Tom Lane. Reviewed by Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWdNLgpKihmURF8nfofP0RFtAKJ7ktY6GcZOPnMfUoRqA@mail.gmail.com
* Fix division by zero error in date_binJohn Naylor2021-07-22
| | | | | | Bauyrzhan Sakhariyev, via Github Backpatch to v14
* Fix typo in commentPeter Eisentraut2021-07-22
| | | | | Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20210716.170209.175434392011070182.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
* Document "B" and "us" as accepted units in postgres.conf.sampleJohn Naylor2021-07-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | In postgresql.conf, memory and file size GUCs can be specified with "B" (bytes) as of b06d8e58b. Likewise, time GUCs can be specified with "us" (microseconds) as of caf626b2c. Update postgres.conf.sample to reflect that fact. Pavel Luzanov Backpatch to v12, which is the earliest version that allows both of these units. A separate commit will document the "B" case for v11. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f10d16fc-8fa0-1b3c-7371-cb3a35a13b7a%40postgrespro.ru
* Add missing check of noError parameter in euc_tw_and_big5.cJohn Naylor2021-07-21
| | | | | | | | | | Oversight in ea1b99a66 Yukun Wang Backpatch to v14 where this parameter was introduced Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/OS0PR01MB6003FCEFF0201EF21685FD33B4E39%40OS0PR01MB6003.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
* Remove some whitespace in generated C outputPeter Eisentraut2021-07-19
| | | | | | | | It doesn't match the normal coding style. Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/22016aa9-ca59-15c7-01df-f292cb558c4d@enterprisedb.com
* Make UCS_to_most.pl process encodings in sorted orderPeter Eisentraut2021-07-19
| | | | | | | | This just makes the progress output easier to follow. Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/22016aa9-ca59-15c7-01df-f292cb558c4d@enterprisedb.com
* Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriatePeter Eisentraut2021-07-19
| | | | | | | Instead of castNode(…, lfoo(…)) Author: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/87eecahraj.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
* Support for unnest(multirange)Alexander Korotkov2021-07-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It has been spotted that multiranges lack of ability to decompose them into individual ranges. Subscription and proper expanded object representation require substantial work, and it's too late for v14. This commit provides the implementation of unnest(multirange), which is quite trivial. unnest(multirange) is defined as a polymorphic procedure. Catversion is bumped. Reported-by: Jonathan S. Katz Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/60258efe-bd7e-4886-82e1-196e0cac5433%40postgresql.org Author: Alexander Korotkov Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby, Jonathan S. Katz, Zhihong Yu, Tom Lane Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera
* Remove unused function parameter in get_qual_from_partboundJohn Naylor2021-07-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 0563a3a8b changed how partition constraints were generated such that this function no longer computes the mapping of parent attnos to child attnos. This is an external function that extensions could use, so this is potentially a breaking change. No external callers are known, however, and this will make it simpler to write such callers in the future. Author: Hou Zhijie Reviewed-by: David Rowley, Michael Paquier, Soumyadeep Chakraborty Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/OS0PR01MB5716A75A45BE46101A1B489894379@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
* Change the name of the Result Cache node to MemoizeDavid Rowley2021-07-14
| | | | | | | | | | | "Result Cache" was never a great name for this node, but nobody managed to come up with another name that anyone liked enough. That was until David Johnston mentioned "Node Memoization", which Tom Lane revised to just "Memoize". People seem to like "Memoize", so let's do the rename. Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210708165145.GG1176@momjian.us Backpatch-through: 14, where Result Cache was introduced
* Rename debug_invalidate_system_caches_always to debug_discard_caches.Tom Lane2021-07-13
| | | | | | | | The name introduced by commit 4656e3d66 was agreed to be unreasonably long. To match this change, rename initdb's recently-added --clobber-cache option to --discard-caches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1374320.1625430433@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Robustify tuplesort's free_sort_tuple functionDavid Rowley2021-07-13
| | | | | | | | | | | 41469253e went to the trouble of removing a theoretical bug from free_sort_tuple by checking if the tuple was NULL before freeing it. Let's make this a little more robust by also setting the tuple to NULL so that should we be called again we won't end up doing a pfree on the already pfree'd tuple. Per advice from Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3188192.1626136953@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 9.6, same as 41469253e
* Fix theoretical bug in tuplesortDavid Rowley2021-07-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This fixes a theoretical bug in tuplesort.c which, if a bounded sort was used in combination with a byval Datum sort (tuplesort_begin_datum), when switching the sort to a bounded heap in make_bounded_heap(), we'd call free_sort_tuple(). The problem was that when sorting Datums of a byval type, the tuple is NULL and free_sort_tuple() would free the memory for it regardless of that. This would result in a crash. Here we fix that simply by adding a check to see if the tuple is NULL before trying to disassociate and free any memory belonging to it. The reason this bug is only theoretical is that nowhere in the current code base do we do tuplesort_set_bound() when performing a Datum sort. However, let's backpatch a fix for this as if any extension uses the code in this way then it's likely to cause problems. Author: Ronan Dunklau Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpdoqNC5FjDb3KUTSMs5dg6f+XxH4Bg_dVcLi8UYAG3EQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 9.6, oldest supported version
* Fix assign_record_type_typmod().Jeff Davis2021-07-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If an error occurred in the wrong place, it was possible to leave an unintialized entry in the hash table, leading to a crash. Fixed. Also, be more careful about the order of operations so that an allocation error doesn't leak memory in CacheMemoryContext or unnecessarily advance NextRecordTypmod. Backpatch through version 11. Earlier versions (prior to 35ea75632a5) do not exhibit the problem, because an uninitialized hash entry contains a valid empty list. Author: Sait Talha Nisanci <Sait.Nisanci@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/HE1PR8303MB009069D476225B9A9E194B8891779@HE1PR8303MB0090.EURPRD83.prod.outlook.com Backpatch-through: 11
* Fix numeric_mul() overflow due to too many digits after decimal point.Dean Rasheed2021-07-10
| | | | | | | | | This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too many digits *before* the decimal point. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUmeFWCrq2dNzZpRj5+6LfN85jYiDoqm+ucSXhb9U2TbA@mail.gmail.com
* Teach pg_size_pretty and pg_size_bytes about petabytesDavid Rowley2021-07-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There was talk about adding units all the way up to yottabytes but it seems quite far-fetched that anyone would need those. Since such large units are not exactly commonplace, it seems unlikely that having pg_size_pretty outputting unit any larger than petabytes would actually be helpful to anyone. Since petabytes are on the horizon, let's just add those only. Maybe one day we'll get to add additional units, but it will likely be a while before we'll need to think beyond petabytes in regards to the size of a database. Author: David Christensen Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOxo6XKmHc_WZip-x5QwaOqFEiCq_SVD0B7sbTZQk+qqcn2qaw@mail.gmail.com
* Use a lookup table for units in pg_size_pretty and pg_size_bytesDavid Rowley2021-07-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We've grown 2 versions of pg_size_pretty over the years, one for BIGINT and one for NUMERIC. Both should output the same, but keeping them in sync is harder than needed due to neither function sharing a source of truth about which units to use and how to transition to the next largest unit. Here we add a static array which defines the units that we recognize and have both pg_size_pretty and pg_size_pretty_numeric use it. This will make adding any units in the future a very simple task. The table contains all information required to allow us to also modify pg_size_bytes to use the lookup table, so adjust that too. There are no behavioral changes here. Author: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed, Tom Lane, David Christensen Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvru1F7qsEVL-iOHeezJ+5WVxXnyD_Jo9nht+Eh85ekK-Q@mail.gmail.com
* Fix incorrect return value in pg_size_pretty(bigint)David Rowley2021-07-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Due to how pg_size_pretty(bigint) was implemented, it's possible that when given a negative number of bytes that the returning value would not match the equivalent positive return value when given the equivalent positive number of bytes. This was due to two separate issues. 1. The function used bit shifting to convert the number of bytes into larger units. The rounding performed by bit shifting is not the same as dividing. For example -3 >> 1 = -2, but -3 / 2 = -1. These two operations are only equivalent with positive numbers. 2. The half_rounded() macro rounded towards positive infinity. This meant that negative numbers rounded towards zero and positive numbers rounded away from zero. Here we fix #1 by dividing the values instead of bit shifting. We fix #2 by adjusting the half_rounded macro always to round away from zero. Additionally, adjust the pg_size_pretty(numeric) function to be more explicit that it's using division rather than bit shifting. A casual observer might have believed bit shifting was used due to a static function being named numeric_shift_right. However, that function was calculating the divisor from the number of bits and performed division. Here we make that more clear. This change is just cosmetic and does not affect the return value of the numeric version of the function. Here we also add a set of regression tests both versions of pg_size_pretty() which test the values directly before and after the function switches to the next unit. This bug was introduced in 8a1fab36a. Prior to that negative values were always displayed in bytes. Author: Dean Rasheed, David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCXnNW4HsmZnxhfezR5FuiGgp+mkY4AzcL5eRGO4fuadWg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 9.6, where the bug was introduced.
* Reduce overhead of cache-clobber testing in LookupOpclassInfo().Tom Lane2021-07-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 03ffc4d6d added logic to bypass all caching behavior in LookupOpclassInfo when CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS is enabled. It doesn't look like I stopped to think much about what that would cost, but recent investigation shows that the cost is enormous: it roughly doubles the time needed for cache-clobber test runs. There does seem to be value in this behavior when trying to test the opclass-cache loading logic itself, but for other purposes the cost is excessive. Hence, let's back off to doing this only when debug_invalidate_system_caches_always is at least 3; or in older branches, when CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY is defined. While here, clean up some other minor issues in LookupOpclassInfo. Re-order the code so we aren't left with broken cache entries (leading to later core dumps) in the unlikely case that we suffer OOM while trying to allocate space for a new entry. (That seems to be my oversight in 03ffc4d6d.) Also, in >= v13, stop allocating one array entry too many. That's evidently left over from sloppy reversion in 851b14b0c. Back-patch to all supported branches, mainly to reduce the runtime of cache-clobbering buildfarm animals. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1370856.1625428625@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Prevent numeric overflows in parallel numeric aggregates.Dean Rasheed2021-07-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Formerly various numeric aggregate functions supported parallel aggregation by having each worker convert partial aggregate values to Numeric and use numeric_send() as part of serializing their state. That's problematic, since the range of Numeric is smaller than that of NumericVar, so it's possible for it to overflow (on either side of the decimal point) in cases that would succeed in non-parallel mode. Fix by serializing NumericVars instead, to avoid the overflow risk and ensure that parallel and non-parallel modes work the same. A side benefit is that this improves the efficiency of the serialization/deserialization code, which can make a noticeable difference to performance with large numbers of parallel workers. No back-patch due to risk from changing the binary format of the aggregate serialization states, as well as lack of prior field complaints and low probability of such overflows in practice. Patch by me. Thanks to David Rowley for review and performance testing, and Ranier Vilela for an additional suggestion. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUmeFWCrq2dNzZpRj5+6LfN85jYiDoqm+ucSXhb9U2TbA@mail.gmail.com
* Use WaitLatch() instead of pg_usleep() at end-of-vacuum truncationMichael Paquier2021-07-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | This has the advantage to make a process more responsive when the postmaster dies, even if the wait time was rather limited as there was only a 50ms timeout here. Another advantage of this change is for monitoring, as we gain a new wait event for the end-of-vacuum truncation. Author: Bharath Rupireddy Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Thomas Munro, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACU4AdPCq6NLfcA-ZGwX7pPCK5FgEj-CAU0xCKzkASSy_A@mail.gmail.com
* Improve various places that double the size of a bufferDavid Rowley2021-07-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Several places were performing a tight loop to determine the first power of 2 number that's > or >= the required memory. Instead of using a loop for that, we can use pg_nextpower2_32 or pg_nextpower2_64. When we need a power of 2 number equal to or greater than a given amount, we just pass the amount to the nextpower2 function. When we need a power of 2 greater than the amount, we just pass the amount + 1. Additionally, in tsearch there were a couple of locations that were performing a while loop when a simple "if" would have done. In both of these locations only 1 item is being added, so the loop could only have ever iterated once. Changing the loop into an if statement makes the code very slightly more optimal as the condition is checked once rather than twice. There are quite a few remaining locations that increase the size of the buffer in the following form: while (reqsize >= buflen) { buflen *= 2; buf = repalloc(buf, buflen); } These are not touched in this commit. repalloc will error out for sizes larger than MaxAllocSize. Changing these to use pg_nextpower2_32 would remove the chance of that error being raised. It's unclear from the code if the sizes could ever become that large, so err on the side of caution. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvp=tns7RL4PH0ZR0M+M-YFLquK7218x=0B_zO+DbOma+w@mail.gmail.com Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu
* Replace magic constants used in pg_stat_get_replication_slot().Amit Kapila2021-06-30
| | | | | | | | | | A few variables have been using 10 as a magic constant while PG_STAT_GET_REPLICATION_SLOT_COLS can be used instead. Author: Masahiko Sawada Reviewed-By: Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 14, where it was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBvqODDfmD17DkEuPCvV2KbruukXQ2Vwrv5Xi-TsAsTJA@mail.gmail.com
* Fixes for multirange selectivity estimationAlexander Korotkov2021-06-29
| | | | | | | | | | | * Fix enumeration of the multirange operators in calc_multirangesel() and calc_multirangesel() switches. * Add more regression tests for matching to empty ranges/multiranges. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c5269c65-f967-77c5-ff7c-15e621c47f6a%40gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov Backpatch-through: 14, where multiranges were introduced
* Add index OID macro argument to DECLARE_INDEXPeter Eisentraut2021-06-29
| | | | | | | | | Instead of defining symbols such as AmOidIndexId explicitly, include them as an argument of DECLARE_INDEX() and have genbki.pl generate the way as the table OID symbols from the CATALOG() declaration. Reviewed-by: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ccef1e46-a404-25b1-9b4c-85f2c08e1f28%40enterprisedb.com
* Add support for LZ4 with compression of full-page writes in WALMichael Paquier2021-06-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The logic is implemented so as there can be a choice in the compression used when building a WAL record, and an extra per-record bit is used to track down if a block is compressed with PGLZ, LZ4 or nothing. wal_compression, the existing parameter, is changed to an enum with support for the following backward-compatible values: - "off", the default, to not use compression. - "pglz" or "on", to compress FPWs with PGLZ. - "lz4", the new mode, to compress FPWs with LZ4. Benchmarking has showed that LZ4 outclasses easily PGLZ. ZSTD would be also an interesting choice, but going just with LZ4 for now makes the patch minimalistic as toast compression is already able to use LZ4, so there is no need to worry about any build-related needs for this implementation. Author: Andrey Borodin, Justin Pryzby Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3037310D-ECB7-4BF1-AF20-01C10BB33A33@yandex-team.ru
* Message style improvementsPeter Eisentraut2021-06-28
|
* Improve RelationGetIdentityKeyBitmap().Amit Kapila2021-06-28
| | | | | | | | | | | We were using RelationGetIndexList() to update the relation's replica identity index but instead, we can directly use RelationGetReplicaIndex() which uses the same functionality. This is a minor code readability improvement. Author: Japin Li Reviewed-By: Takamichi Osumi, Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4C99A862-69C8-431F-960A-81B1151F1B89@enterprisedb.com
* Change recovery_init_sync_method to PGC_SIGHUP.Thomas Munro2021-06-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The setting has no effect except during startup. It's still nice to be able to change it dynamically, which is expected to be pretty useful to an admin following crash recovery when restarting the cluster is not so appealing. Per discussions following commits 2941138e6 and 61752afb2. Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210529192321.GM2082%40telsasoft.com
* Error message refactoringPeter Eisentraut2021-06-27
| | | | | | Take some untranslatable things out of the message and replace by format placeholders, to reduce translatable strings and reduce translation mistakes.
* doc: Move remove_temp_files_after_crash to section for developer optionsMichael Paquier2021-06-25
| | | | | | | | | | | The main goal of this option is to allow inspecting temporary files for debugging purposes, so moving the parameter there is natural. Oversight in cd91de0. Reported-by: Justin Pryzby Author: Euler Taveira Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210612004347.GP16435@telsasoft.com
* Another fix to relmapper race condition.Heikki Linnakangas2021-06-24
| | | | | | | | In previous commit, I missed that relmap_redo() was also not acquiring the RelationMappingLock. Thanks to Thomas Munro for pointing that out. Backpatch-through: 9.6, like previous commit. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKGLev%3DPpOSaL3WRZgOvgk217et%2BbxeJcRr4eR-NttP1F6Q%40mail.gmail.com
* Prevent race condition while reading relmapper file.Heikki Linnakangas2021-06-24
| | | | | | | | | | | Contrary to the comment here, POSIX does not guarantee atomicity of a read(), if another process calls write() concurrently. Or at least Linux does not. Add locking to load_relmap_file() to avoid the race condition. Fixes bug #17064. Thanks to Alexander Lakhin for the report and test case. Backpatch-through: 9.6, all supported versions. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17064-bb0d7904ef72add3@postgresql.org
* Handle no replica identity index case in RelationGetIdentityKeyBitmap.Amit Kapila2021-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | Commit e7eea52b2d has introduced a new function RelationGetIdentityKeyBitmap which omits to handle the case where there is no replica identity index on a relation. Author: Mark Dilger Reviewed-by: Takamichi Osumi, Amit Kapila Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4C99A862-69C8-431F-960A-81B1151F1B89@enterprisedb.com
* Revert 29854ee8d1 due to buildfarm failuresAlexander Korotkov2021-06-15
| | | | | Reported-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdvcnw3x7jdV3r52p4%3D5S4WUxBCzcQKB3JukQHoicv1LSQ%40mail.gmail.com
* Support for unnest(multirange) and cast multirange as an array of rangesAlexander Korotkov2021-06-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It has been spotted that multiranges lack of ability to decompose them into individual ranges. Subscription and proper expanded object representation require substantial work, and it's too late for v14. This commit provides the implementation of unnest(multirange) and cast multirange as an array of ranges, which is quite trivial. unnest(multirange) is defined as a polymorphic procedure. The catalog description of the cast underlying procedure is duplicated for each multirange type because we don't have anyrangearray polymorphic type to use here. Catversion is bumped. Reported-by: Jonathan S. Katz Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/60258efe-bd7e-4886-82e1-196e0cac5433%40postgresql.org Author: Alexander Korotkov Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby, Jonathan S. Katz, Zhihong Yu
* Ensure pg_filenode_relation(0, 0) returns NULL.Tom Lane2021-06-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, a zero value for the relfilenode resulted in a confusing error message about "unexpected duplicate". This function returns NULL for other invalid relfilenode values, so zero should be treated likewise. It's been like this all along, so back-patch to all supported branches. Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210612023324.GT16435@telsasoft.com
* Reconsider the handling of procedure OUT parameters.Tom Lane2021-06-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 2453ea142 redefined pg_proc.proargtypes to include the types of OUT parameters, for procedures only. While that had some advantages for implementing the SQL-spec behavior of DROP PROCEDURE, it was pretty disastrous from a number of other perspectives. Notably, since the primary key of pg_proc is name + proargtypes, this made it possible to have multiple procedures with identical names + input arguments and differing output argument types. That would make it impossible to call any one of the procedures by writing just NULL (or "?", or any other data-type-free notation) for the output argument(s). The change also seems likely to cause grave confusion for client applications that examine pg_proc and expect the traditional definition of proargtypes. Hence, revert the definition of proargtypes to what it was, and undo a number of complications that had been added to support that. To support the SQL-spec behavior of DROP PROCEDURE, when there are no argmode markers in the command's parameter list, we perform the lookup both ways (that is, matching against both proargtypes and proallargtypes), succeeding if we get just one unique match. In principle this could result in ambiguous-function failures that would not happen when using only one of the two rules. However, overloading of procedure names is thought to be a pretty rare usage, so this shouldn't cause many problems in practice. Postgres-specific code such as pg_dump can defend against any possibility of such failures by being careful to specify argmodes for all procedure arguments. This also fixes a few other bugs in the area of CALL statements with named parameters, and improves the documentation a little. catversion bump forced because the representation of procedures with OUT arguments changes. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3742981.1621533210@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Reorder superuser check in pg_log_backend_memory_contexts()Michael Paquier2021-06-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The use of this function is limited to superusers and the code includes a hardcoded check for that. However, the code would look for the PGPROC entry to signal for the memory dump before checking if the user is a superuser or not, which does not make sense if we know that an error will be returned. Note that the code would let one know if a process was a PostgreSQL process or not even for non-authorized users, which is not the case now, but this avoids taking ProcArrayLock that will most likely finish by being unnecessary. Thanks to Julien Rouhaud and Tom Lane for the discussion. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YLxw1uVGIAP5uMPl@paquier.xyz
* Adjust locations which have an incorrect copyright yearDavid Rowley2021-06-04
| | | | | | | A few patches committed after ca3b37487 mistakenly forgot to make the copyright year 2021. Fix these. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqyLmd9P2oBQYJ=DbrV8QwyPRdmXtCTFYPE08h+ip0UJw@mail.gmail.com
* Re-allow custom GUC names that have more than two components.Tom Lane2021-06-02
| | | | | | | | | | Commit 3db826bd5 disallowed this case, but it turns out that some people are depending on it. Since the core grammar has allowed it since 3dc37cd8d, it seems like this code should fall in line. Per bug #17045 from Robert Sosinski. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17045-6a4a9f0d1513f72b@postgresql.org
* Reject SELECT ... GROUP BY GROUPING SETS (()) FOR UPDATE.Tom Lane2021-06-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This case should be disallowed, just as FOR UPDATE with a plain GROUP BY is disallowed; FOR UPDATE only makes sense when each row of the query result can be identified with a single table row. However, we missed teaching CheckSelectLocking() to check groupingSets as well as groupClause, so that it would allow degenerate grouping sets. That resulted in a bad plan and a null-pointer dereference in the executor. Looking around for other instances of the same bug, the only one I found was in examine_simple_variable(). That'd just lead to silly estimates, but it should be fixed too. Per private report from Yaoguang Chen. Back-patch to all supported branches.
* Improve some error wording with multirange type parsingMichael Paquier2021-05-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | Braces were referred in some error messages as only brackets (not curly brackets or curly braces), which can be confusing as other types of brackets could be used. While on it, add one test to check after the case of junk characters detected after a right brace. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210514.153153.1814935914483287479.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-08-03 01:17:02 +0000