aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Invalidate all partitions for a partitioned table in publication.Amit Kapila2021-09-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Updates/Deletes on a partition were allowed even without replica identity after the parent table was added to a publication. This would later lead to an error on subscribers. The reason was that we were not invalidating the partition's relcache and the publication information for partitions was not getting rebuilt. Similarly, we were not invalidating the partitions' relcache after dropping a partitioned table from a publication which will prohibit Updates/Deletes on its partition without replica identity even without any publication. Reported-by: Haiying Tang Author: Hou Zhijie and Vignesh C Reviewed-by: Vignesh C and Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 13 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB6113D77F583C922F1CEAA1C3FBD29@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
* Add parent table name in an error in reorderbuffer.c.Amit Kapila2021-09-22
| | | | | | | | | This can help in troubleshooting the cause of a particular error that can occur during decoding. Author: Jeremy Schneider Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/808ed65b-994c-915a-361c-577f088b837f@amazon.com
* Fix "single value strategy" index deletion issue.Peter Geoghegan2021-09-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It is not appropriate for deduplication to apply single value strategy when triggered by a bottom-up index deletion pass. This wastes cycles because later bottom-up deletion passes will overinterpret older duplicate tuples that deduplication actually just skipped over "by design". It also makes bottom-up deletion much less effective for low cardinality indexes that happen to cross a meaningless "index has single key value per leaf page" threshold. To fix, slightly narrow the conditions under which deduplication's single value strategy is considered. We already avoided the strategy for a unique index, since our high level goal must just be to buy time for VACUUM to run (not to buy space). We'll now also avoid it when we just had a bottom-up pass that reported failure. The two cases share the same high level goal, and already overlapped significantly, so this approach is quite natural. Oversight in commit d168b666, which added bottom-up index deletion. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznaOvM+Gyj-JQ0X=JxoMDxctDTYjiEuETdAGbF5EUc3MA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 14-, where bottom-up deletion was introduced.
* Fix misevaluation of STABLE parameters in CALL within plpgsql.Tom Lane2021-09-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Before commit 84f5c2908, a STABLE function in a plpgsql CALL statement's argument list would see an up-to-date snapshot, because exec_stmt_call would push a new snapshot. I got rid of that because the possibility of the snapshot disappearing within COMMIT made it too hard to manage a snapshot across the CALL statement. That's fine so far as the procedure itself goes, but I forgot to think about the possibility of STABLE functions within the CALL argument list. As things now stand, those'll be executed with the Portal's snapshot as ActiveSnapshot, keeping them from seeing updates more recent than Portal startup. (VOLATILE functions don't have a problem because they take their own snapshots; which indeed is also why the procedure itself doesn't have a problem. There are no STABLE procedures.) We can fix this by pushing a new snapshot transiently within ExecuteCallStmt itself. Popping the snapshot before we get into the procedure proper eliminates the management problem. The possibly-useless extra snapshot-grab is slightly annoying, but it's no worse than what happened before 84f5c2908. Per bug #17199 from Alexander Nawratil. Back-patch to v11, like the previous patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17199-1ab2561f0d94af92@postgresql.org
* Document XLOG_INCLUDE_XID a little betterAlvaro Herrera2021-09-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | I noticed that commit 0bead9af484c left this flag undocumented in XLogSetRecordFlags, which led me to discover that the flag doesn't actually do what the one comment on it said it does. Improve the situation by adding some more comments. Backpatch to 14, where the aforementioned commit appears. Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202109212119.c3nhfp64t2ql@alvherre.pgsql
* Introduce GUC shared_memory_size_in_huge_pagesMichael Paquier2021-09-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This runtime-computed GUC shows the number of huge pages required for the server's main shared memory area, taking advantage of the work done in 0c39c29 and 0bd305e. This is useful for users to estimate the amount of huge pages required for a server as it becomes possible to do an estimation without having to start the server and potentially allocate a large chunk of shared memory. The number of huge pages is calculated based on the existing GUC huge_page_size if set, or by using the system's default by looking at /proc/meminfo on Linux. There is nothing new here as this commit reuses the existing calculation methods, and just exposes this information directly to the user. The routine calculating the huge page size is refactored to limit the number of files with platform-specific flags. This new GUC's name was the most popular choice based on the discussion done. This is only supported on Linux. I have taken the time to test the change on Linux, Windows and MacOS, though for the last two ones large pages are not supported. The first one calculates correctly the number of pages depending on the existing GUC huge_page_size or the system's default. Thanks to Andres Freund, Robert Haas, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Tom Lane, Justin Pryzby (and anybody forgotten here) for the discussion. Author: Nathan Bossart Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/F2772387-CE0F-46BF-B5F1-CC55516EB885@amazon.com
* Remove overzealous index deletion assertion.Peter Geoghegan2021-09-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A broken HOT chain is not an unexpected condition, even when the offset number points past the end of the page's line pointer array. heap_prune_chain() does not (and never has) treated this condition as unexpected, so derivative code in heap_index_delete_tuples() shouldn't do so either. Oversight in commit 4228817449. The assertion can probably only fail on Postgres 14 and master. Earlier releases don't have commit 3c3b8a4b, which taught VACUUM to truncate the line pointer array of heap pages. Backpatch all the same, just to be consistent. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Reported-By: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17197-9438f31f46705182@postgresql.org Backpatch: 12-, just like commit 4228817449.
* pgstat: Prepare to use mechanism for truncated rels also for droppped rels.Andres Freund2021-09-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The upcoming shared memory stats patch drops stats for dropped objects in a transactional manner, rather than removing them later as part of vacuum. This means that stats for DROP inside a transaction needs to handle aborted (sub-)transactions similar to TRUNCATE: The stats up to the DROP should be restored. Rename the existing infrastructure in preparation. Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210405092914.mmxqe7j56lsjfsej@alap3.anarazel.de
* pgstat: Split out relation stats handling from AtEO[Sub]Xact_PgStat() etc.Andres Freund2021-09-20
| | | | | | | | | An upcoming patch will add additional work to these functions. To avoid the functions getting too complicated / doing too many things at once, split out sub-tasks into their own functions. Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210405092914.mmxqe7j56lsjfsej@alap3.anarazel.de
* Disallow extended statistics on system columnsTomas Vondra2021-09-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since introduction of extended statistics, we've disallowed references to system columns. So for example CREATE STATISTICS s ON ctid FROM t; would fail. But with extended statistics on expressions, it was possible to work around this limitation quite easily CREATE STATISTICS s ON (ctid::text) FROM t; This is an oversight in a4d75c86bf, fixed by adding a simple check. Backpatch to PostgreSQL 14, where support for extended statistics on expressions was introduced. Backpatch-through: 14 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210816013255.GS10479%40telsasoft.com
* process startup: Split single user code out of PostgresMain().Andres Freund2021-09-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It was harder than necessary to understand PostgresMain() because the code for a normal backend was interspersed with single-user mode specific code. Split most of the single-user mode code into its own function PostgresSingleUserMain(), that does all the necessary setup for single-user mode, and then hands off after that to PostgresMain(). There still is some single-user mode code in InitPostgres(), and it'd likely be worth moving at least some of it out. But that's for later. Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
* Fix pull_varnos to cope with translated PlaceHolderVars.Tom Lane2021-09-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 55dc86eca changed pull_varnos to use (if possible) the associated ph_eval_at for a PlaceHolderVar. I missed a fine point though: we might be looking at a PHV in the quals or tlist of a child appendrel, in which case we need to compute a ph_eval_at value that's been translated in the same way that the PHV itself has been (cf. adjust_appendrel_attrs). Fortunately, enough info is available in the PlaceHolderInfo to make such translation possible without additional outside data, so we don't need another round of uglification of planner APIs. This is a little bit complicated, but since it's a hard-to-hit corner case, I'm not much worried about adding cycles here. Per report from Jaime Casanova. Back-patch to v12, like the previous commit. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210915230959.GB17635@ahch-to
* Fix EXPLAIN to handle SEARCH BREADTH FIRST queries.Tom Lane2021-09-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The rewriter transformation for SEARCH BREADTH FIRST produces a FieldSelect on a Var of type RECORD, where the Var references the recursive union's worktable output. EXPLAIN VERBOSE failed to handle this case, because it only expected such Vars to appear in CteScans not WorkTableScans. Fix that, and add some test cases exercising EXPLAIN on SEARCH and CYCLE queries. In principle this oversight is an old bug, but it seems that the case is unreachable without SEARCH BREADTH FIRST, because the parser fails when attempting to create such a reference manually. So for today I'll just patch HEAD/v14. Someday we might find that the code portion of this patch needs to be back-patched further. Per report from Atsushi Torikoshi. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5bafa66ad529e11860339565c9e7c166@oss.nttdata.com
* Message style improvementsPeter Eisentraut2021-09-16
|
* process startup: Do InitProcess() at the same time regardless of EXEC_BACKEND.Andres Freund2021-09-16
| | | | | | | | | An upcoming patch splits single user mode into its own function. This makes that easier. Split out for easier review / testing. Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
* Fix performance regression from session statistics.Andres Freund2021-09-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Session statistics, as introduced by 960869da08, had several shortcomings: - an additional GetCurrentTimestamp() call that also impaired the accuracy of the data collected This can be avoided by passing the current timestamp we already have in pgstat_report_stat(). - an additional statistics UDP packet sent every 500ms This is solved by adding the new statistics to PgStat_MsgTabstat. This is conceptually ugly, because session statistics are not table statistics. But the struct already contains data unrelated to tables, so there is not much damage done. Connection and disconnection are reported in separate messages, which reduces the number of additional messages to two messages per session and a slight increase in PgStat_MsgTabstat size (but the same number of table stats fit). - Session time computation could overflow on systems where long is 32 bit. Reported-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Author: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210801205501.nyxzxoelqoo4x2qc%40alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 14-, where the feature was introduced.
* Fix variable shadowing in procarray.c.Fujii Masao2021-09-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | ProcArrayGroupClearXid function has a parameter named "proc", but the same name was used for its local variables. This commit fixes this variable shadowing, to improve code readability. Back-patch to all supported versions, to make future back-patching easy though this patch is classified as refactoring only. Reported-by: Ranier Vilela Author: Ranier Vilela, Aleksander Alekseev https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAqyoTZC670xWi6w-Oe2_Bk1bfu2JzXz6xRfiOUzm7xbyQ@mail.gmail.com
* Use int instead of size_t in procarray.c.Fujii Masao2021-09-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | All size_t variables declared in procarray.c are actually int ones. Let's use int instead of size_t for those variables. Which would reduce Wsign-compare compiler warnings. Back-patch to v14 where commit 941697c3c1 added size_t variables in procarray.c, to make future back-patching easy though this patch is classified as refactoring only. Reported-by: Ranier Vilela Author: Ranier Vilela, Aleksander Alekseev https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAqyoTZC670xWi6w-Oe2_Bk1bfu2JzXz6xRfiOUzm7xbyQ@mail.gmail.com
* Support "postgres -C" with runtime-computed GUCsMichael Paquier2021-09-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Until now, the -C option of postgres was handled before a small subset of GUCs computed at runtime are initialized, leading to incorrect results as GUC machinery would fall back to default values for such parameters. For example, data_checksums could report "off" for a cluster as the control file is not loaded yet. Or wal_segment_size would show a segment size at 16MB even if initdb --wal-segsize used something else. Worse, the command would fail to properly report the recently-introduced shared_memory, that requires to load shared_preload_libraries as these could ask for a chunk of shared memory. Support for runtime GUCs comes with a limitation, as the operation is now allowed on a running server. One notable reason for this is that _PG_init() functions of loadable libraries are called before all runtime-computed GUCs are initialized, and this is not guaranteed to be safe to do on running servers. For the case of shared_memory_size, where we want to know how much memory would be used without allocating it, this limitation is fine. Another case where this will help is for huge pages, with the introduction of a different GUC to evaluate the amount of huge pages required for a server before starting it, without having to allocate large chunks of memory. This feature is controlled with a new GUC flag, and four parameters are classified as runtime-computed as of this change: - data_checksums - shared_memory_size - data_directory_mode - wal_segment_size Some TAP tests are added to provide some coverage here, using data_checksums in the tests of pg_checksums. Per discussion with Andres Freund, Justin Pryzby, Magnus Hagander and more. Author: Nathan Bossart Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/F2772387-CE0F-46BF-B5F1-CC55516EB885@amazon.com
* process startup: Initialize PgStartTime earlier in single user mode.Andres Freund2021-09-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | An upcoming patch splits single user mode handling out of PostgresMain(). The startup time only needs to be determined in single user mode. Currently the initialization happens late, which makes the split a bit harder. As postmaster determines the time earlier it makes sense to move the time for single user mode to a roughly similar point in time. Reviewd-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
* Remove arbitrary 64K-or-so limit on rangetable size.Tom Lane2021-09-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Up to now the size of a query's rangetable has been limited by the constants INNER_VAR et al, which mustn't be equal to any real rangetable index. 65000 doubtless seemed like enough for anybody, and it still is orders of magnitude larger than the number of joins we can realistically handle. However, we need a rangetable entry for each child partition that is (or might be) processed by a query. Queries with a few thousand partitions are getting more realistic, so that the day when that limit becomes a problem is in sight, even if it's not here yet. Hence, let's raise the limit. Rather than just increase the values of INNER_VAR et al, this patch adopts the approach of making them small negative values, so that rangetables could theoretically become as long as INT_MAX. The bulk of the patch is concerned with changing Var.varno and some related variables from "Index" (unsigned int) to plain "int". This is basically cosmetic, with little actual effect other than to help debuggers print their values nicely. As such, I've only bothered with changing places that could actually see INNER_VAR et al, which the parser and most of the planner don't. We do have to be careful in places that are performing less/greater comparisons on varnos, but there are very few such places, other than the IS_SPECIAL_VARNO macro itself. A notable side effect of this patch is that while it used to be possible to add INNER_VAR et al to a Bitmapset, that will now draw an error. I don't see any likelihood that it wouldn't be a bug to include these fake varnos in a bitmapset of real varnos, so I think this is all to the good. Although this touches outfuncs/readfuncs, I don't think a catversion bump is required, since stored rules would never contain Vars with these fake varnos. Andrey Lepikhov and Tom Lane, after a suggestion by Peter Eisentraut Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/43c7f2f5-1e27-27aa-8c65-c91859d15190@postgrespro.ru
* Disallow LISTEN in background workers.Tom Lane2021-09-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's possible to execute user-defined SQL in some background processes; for example, logical replication workers can fire triggers. This opens the possibility that someone would try to execute LISTEN in such a context. But since only regular backends ever call ProcessNotifyInterrupt, no messages would actually be received, and thus the registered listener would simply prevent the message queue from being cleaned. Eventually NOTIFY would stop working, which is bad. Perhaps someday somebody will invent infrastructure to make listening in a background worker actually useful. In the meantime, forbid it. Back-patch to v13, which is where we introduced the MyBackendType variable. It'd be a lot harder to implement the check without that, and it doesn't seem worth the trouble. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/153243441449.1404.2274116228506175596@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Make node output prefix match node structure namePeter Eisentraut2021-09-15
| | | | | | | | | | | In most cases, the prefix string in a node output is the upper case of the node structure name, e.g., MergeAppend -> MERGEAPPEND. There were a few exceptions that for either no apparent reason or perhaps minor aesthetic reasons deviated from this. In order to simplify this and perhaps allow automatic generation without having to deal with exception cases, make them all match. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c091e5cd-45f8-69ee-6a9b-de86912cc7e7@enterprisedb.com
* Fix hash_arrayPeter Eisentraut2021-09-15
| | | | | | | | | | | Commit a3d2b1bbe904b0ca8d9fdde20f25295ff3e21f79 neglected to initialize the type_id field of the synthesized type cache entry, so it would make a new one on every call. Also, better use the per-function memory context for this; otherwise it leaks memory. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/17158-8a2ba823982537a4%40postgresql.org
* Update README for resource owners about the resource types supportedMichael Paquier2021-09-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | All the types supported were listed directly in the README, but it was very outdated. Rather than listing all the types supported in the README, this commit adds a reference to look at ResourceOwnerData in resowner.c to get this information. The order of the paragraphs is reworked a bit for clarity. Author: Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqHtfT9z=4H5+F7DOy0OyNHAaVwuRcakt9b2t2uADOaiag@mail.gmail.com
* Improve log messages from pg_import_system_collations().Tom Lane2021-09-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | pg_import_system_collations() was a bit inconsistent about how it reported locales (names output by "locale -a") that it didn't make pg_collation entries for. IMV we should print some suitable message for every locale that we reject, except when it matches a pre-existing pg_collation entry. (This is all at DEBUG1 log level, though, so as not to create noise during initdb.) Add messages for the two cases that were previously not logged, namely unrecognized encoding and client-only encoding. Re-word the existing messages to have a consistent style. Anton Voloshin and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/429d64ee-188d-3ce1-106a-53a8b45c4fce@postgrespro.ru
* Send NOTIFY signals during CommitTransaction.Tom Lane2021-09-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Formerly, we sent signals for outgoing NOTIFY messages within ProcessCompletedNotifies, which was also responsible for sending relevant ones of those messages to our connected client. It therefore had to run during the main-loop processing that occurs just before going idle. This arrangement had two big disadvantages: * Now that procedures allow intra-command COMMITs, it would be useful to send NOTIFYs to other sessions immediately at COMMIT (though, for reasons of wire-protocol stability, we still shouldn't forward them to our client until end of command). * Background processes such as replication workers would not send NOTIFYs at all, since they never execute the client communication loop. We've had requests to allow triggers running in replication workers to send NOTIFYs, so that's a problem. To fix these things, move transmission of outgoing NOTIFY signals into AtCommit_Notify, where it will happen during CommitTransaction. Also move the possible call of asyncQueueAdvanceTail there, to ensure we don't bloat the async SLRU if a background worker sends many NOTIFYs with no one listening. We can also drop the call of asyncQueueReadAllNotifications, allowing ProcessCompletedNotifies to go away entirely. That's because commit 790026972 added a call of ProcessNotifyInterrupt adjacent to PostgresMain's call of ProcessCompletedNotifies, and that does its own call of asyncQueueReadAllNotifications, meaning that we were uselessly doing two such calls (inside two separate transactions) whenever inbound notify signals coincided with an outbound notify. We need only set notifyInterruptPending to ensure that ProcessNotifyInterrupt runs, and we're done. The existing documentation suggests that custom background workers should call ProcessCompletedNotifies if they want to send NOTIFY messages. To avoid an ABI break in the back branches, reduce it to an empty routine rather than removing it entirely. Removal will occur in v15. Although the problems mentioned above have existed for awhile, I don't feel comfortable back-patching this any further than v13. There was quite a bit of churn in adjacent code between 12 and 13. At minimum we'd have to also backpatch 51004c717, and a good deal of other adjustment would also be needed, so the benefit-to-risk ratio doesn't look attractive. Per bug #15293 from Michael Powers (and similar gripes from others). Artur Zakirov and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/153243441449.1404.2274116228506175596@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Fix planner error with multiple copies of an AlternativeSubPlan.Tom Lane2021-09-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's possible for us to copy an AlternativeSubPlan expression node into multiple places, for example the scan quals of several partition children. Then it's possible that we choose a different one of the alternatives as optimal in each place. Commit 41efb8340 failed to consider this scenario, so its attempt to remove "unused" subplans could remove subplans that were still used elsewhere. Fix by delaying the removal logic until we've examined all the AlternativeSubPlans in a given query level. (This does assume that AlternativeSubPlans couldn't get copied to other query levels, but for the foreseeable future that's fine; cf qual_is_pushdown_safe.) Per report from Rajkumar Raghuwanshi. Back-patch to v14 where the faulty logic came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6==O3NNZC3bZ2prRYv3cjm3_Zw1GfzmOjEVqYN4jub2+Q@mail.gmail.com
* Add WRITE_INDEX_ARRAYPeter Eisentraut2021-09-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | We have a few WRITE_{name of type}_ARRAY macros, but the one case using the Index type was hand-coded. Wrap it into a macro as well. This also changes the behavior slightly: Before, the field name was skipped if the length was zero. Now it prints the field name even in that case. This is more consistent with how other array fields are handled. Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c091e5cd-45f8-69ee-6a9b-de86912cc7e7@enterprisedb.com
* Add COPY_ARRAY_FIELD and COMPARE_ARRAY_FIELDPeter Eisentraut2021-09-14
| | | | | | | | | These handle node fields that are inline arrays (as opposed to dynamically allocated arrays handled by COPY_POINTER_FIELD and COMPARE_POINTER_FIELD). These cases were hand-coded until now. Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c091e5cd-45f8-69ee-6a9b-de86912cc7e7@enterprisedb.com
* jit: Do not try to shut down LLVM state in case of LLVM triggered errors.Andres Freund2021-09-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If an allocation failed within LLVM it is not safe to call back into LLVM as LLVM is not generally safe against exceptions / stack-unwinding. Thus errors while in LLVM code are promoted to FATAL. However llvm_shutdown() did call back into LLVM even in such cases, while llvm_release_context() was careful not to do so. We cannot generally skip shutting down LLVM, as that can break profiling. But it's OK to do so if there was an error from within LLVM. Reported-By: Jelte Fennema <Jelte.Fennema@microsoft.com> Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM5PR83MB0178C52CCA0A8DEA0207DC14F7FF9@AM5PR83MB0178.EURPRD83.prod.outlook.com Backpatch: 11-, where jit was introduced
* Remove code duplication for permission checks with replication slotsMichael Paquier2021-09-14
| | | | | | | | | | | Two functions, both named check_permissions(), used the same checks to verify if a user had required privileges to work on replication slots. This commit removes the duplication, and moves the function doing the checks to slot.c to be centralized. Author: Bharath Rupireddy Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart, Euler Taveira Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACUPpVw1u7sQocFVWrSs0n10pt_G_4NPZKSxXK6cW1dErw@mail.gmail.com
* Fix reorder buffer memory accounting for toast changes.Amit Kapila2021-09-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | While processing toast changes in logical decoding, we rejigger the tuple change to point to in-memory toast tuples instead to on-disk toast tuples. And, to make sure the memory accounting is correct, we were subtracting the old change size and then after re-computing the new tuple, re-adding its size at the end. Now, if there is any error before we add the new size, we will release the changes and that will update the accounting info (subtracting the size from the counters). And we were underflowing there which leads to an assertion failure in assert enabled builds and wrong memory accounting in reorder buffer otherwise. Author: Bertrand Drouvot Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 13, where memory accounting was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/92b0ee65-b8bd-e42d-c082-4f3f4bf12d34@amazon.com
* Refactor the syslogger pipe protocol to use a bitmask for its optionsMichael Paquier2021-09-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The previous protocol expected a set of matching characters to check if a message sent was the last one or not, that changed depending on the destination wanted: - 't' and 'f' tracked the last message of a log sent to stderr. - 'T' and 'F' tracked the last message of a log sent to csvlog. This could be extended with more characters when introducing new destinations, but using a bitmask is much more elegant. This commit changes the protocol so as a bitmask is used in the header of a log chunk message sent to the syslogger, with the following options available for now: - log_destination as stderr. - log_destination as csvlog. - if a message is the last chunk of a message. Sehrope found this issue in a patch set to introduce JSON as an option for log_destination, but his patch made the size of the protocol header larger. This commit keeps the same size as the original, and adapts the protocol as wanted. Thanks also to Andrew Dunstan and Greg Stark for the discussion. Author: Michael Paquier, Sehrope Sarkuni Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH7T-aqswBM6JWe4pDehi1uOiufqe06DJWaU5=X7dDLyqUExHg@mail.gmail.com
* Make pg_regexec() robust against out-of-range search_start.Tom Lane2021-09-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If search_start is greater than the length of the string, we should just return REG_NOMATCH immediately. (Note that the equality case should *not* be rejected, since the pattern might be able to match zero characters.) This guards various internal assumptions that the min of a range of string positions is not more than the max. Violation of those assumptions could allow an attempt to fetch string[search_start-1], possibly causing a crash. Jaime Casanova pointed out that this situation is reachable with the new regexp_xxx functions that accept a user-specified start position. I don't believe it's reachable via any in-core call site in v14 and below. However, extensions could possibly call pg_regexec with an out-of-range search_start, so let's back-patch the fix anyway. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210911180357.GA6870@ahch-to
* Fix some anomalies with NO SCROLL cursors.Tom Lane2021-09-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We have long forbidden fetching backwards from a NO SCROLL cursor, but the prohibition didn't extend to cases in which we rewind the query altogether and then re-fetch forwards. I think the reason is that this logic was mainly meant to protect plan nodes that can't be run in the reverse direction. However, re-reading the query output is problematic if the query is volatile (which includes SELECT FOR UPDATE, not just queries with volatile functions): the re-read can produce different results, which confuses the cursor navigation logic completely. Another reason for disliking this approach is that some code paths will either fetch backwards or rewind-and-fetch-forwards depending on the distance to the target row; so that seemingly identical use-cases may or may not draw the "cursor can only scan forward" error. Hence, let's clean things up by disallowing rewind as well as fetch-backwards in a NO SCROLL cursor. Ordinarily we'd only make such a definitional change in HEAD, but there is a third reason to consider this change now. Commit ba2c6d6ce created some new user-visible anomalies for non-scrollable cursors WITH HOLD, in that navigation in the cursor result got confused if the cursor had been partially read before committing. The only good way to resolve those anomalies is to forbid rewinding such a cursor, which allows removal of the incorrect cursor state manipulations that ba2c6d6ce added to PersistHoldablePortal. To minimize the behavioral change in the back branches (including v14), refuse to rewind a NO SCROLL cursor only when it has a holdStore, ie has been held over from a previous transaction due to WITH HOLD. This should avoid breaking most applications that have been sloppy about whether to declare cursors as scrollable. We'll enforce the prohibition across-the-board beginning in v15. Back-patch to v11, as ba2c6d6ce was. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3712911.1631207435@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Avoid fetching from an already-terminated plan.Tom Lane2021-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some plan node types don't react well to being called again after they've already returned NULL. PortalRunSelect() has long dealt with this by calling the executor with NoMovementScanDirection if it sees that we've already run the portal to the end. However, commit ba2c6d6ce overlooked this point, so that persisting an already-fully-fetched cursor would fail if it had such a plan. Per report from Tomas Barton. Back-patch to v11, as the faulty commit was. (I've omitted a test case because the type of plan that causes a problem isn't all that stable.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPV2KRjd=ErgVGbvO2Ty20tKTEZZr6cYsYLxgN_W3eAo9pf5sw@mail.gmail.com
* Check for relation length overrun soon enough.Tom Lane2021-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We don't allow relations to exceed 2^32-1 blocks, because block numbers are 32 bits and the last possible block number is reserved to mean InvalidBlockNumber. There is a check for this in mdextend, but that's really way too late, because the smgr API requires us to create a buffer for the block-to-be-added, and we do not want to have any buffer with blocknum InvalidBlockNumber. (Such a case can trigger assertions in bufmgr.c, plus I think it might confuse ReadBuffer's logic for data-past-EOF later on.) So put the check into ReadBuffer. Per report from Christoph Berg. It's been like this forever, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YTn1iTkUYBZfcODk@msg.credativ.de
* Fix issue with WAL archiving in standby.Fujii Masao2021-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, walreceiver always closed the currently-opened WAL segment and created its archive notification file, after it finished writing the current segment up and received any WAL data that should be written into the next segment. If walreceiver exited just before any WAL data in the next segment arrived at standby, it did not create the archive notification file of the current segment even though that's known completed. This behavior could cause WAL archiving of the segment to be delayed until subsequent restartpoints or checkpoints created its notification file. To fix the issue, this commit changes walreceiver so that it creates an archive notification file of a current WAL segment immediately if that's known completed before receiving next WAL data. Back-patch to all supported branches. Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200630.165503.1465894182551545886.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
* Fix _equalA_ConstPeter Eisentraut2021-09-09
| | | | | | 639a86e36aaecb84faaf941dcd0b183ba0aba9e9 neglected to make the necessary adjustments to _equalA_Const. Found only via COPY_PARSE_PLAN_TREES.
* Remove Value node structPeter Eisentraut2021-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The Value node struct is a weird construct. It is its own node type, but most of the time, it actually has a node type of Integer, Float, String, or BitString. As a consequence, the struct name and the node type don't match most of the time, and so it has to be treated specially a lot. There doesn't seem to be any value in the special construct. There is very little code that wants to accept all Value variants but nothing else (and even if it did, this doesn't provide any convenient way to check it), and most code wants either just one particular node type (usually String), or it accepts a broader set of node types besides just Value. This change removes the Value struct and node type and replaces them by separate Integer, Float, String, and BitString node types that are proper node types and structs of their own and behave mostly like normal node types. Also, this removes the T_Null node tag, which was previously also a possible variant of Value but wasn't actually used outside of the Value contained in A_Const. Replace that by an isnull field in A_Const. Reviewed-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5ba6bc5b-3f95-04f2-2419-f8ddb4c046fb@enterprisedb.com
* Remove useless castsPeter Eisentraut2021-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | Casting the argument of strVal() to (Value *) is useless, since strVal() already does that. Most code didn't do that anyway; this was apparently just a style that snuck into certain files. Reviewed-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5ba6bc5b-3f95-04f2-2419-f8ddb4c046fb@enterprisedb.com
* Make shared_memory_size a preset optionMichael Paquier2021-09-09
| | | | | | | | | bd17880 set up that as a memory parameter, but the docs told a different story. A preset parameter is adapted here, as this option is compiled at startup time. Reported-by: Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4cc5b434-b174-9aae-197b-737db6cac4e3@oss.nttdata.com
* Fix rewriter to set hasModifyingCTE correctly on rewritten queries.Tom Lane2021-09-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If we copy data-modifying CTEs from the original query to a replacement query (from a DO INSTEAD rule), we must set hasModifyingCTE properly in the replacement query. Failure to do this can cause various unpleasantness, such as unsafe usage of parallel plans. The code also neglected to propagate hasRecursive, though that's only cosmetic at the moment. A difficulty arises if the rule action is an INSERT...SELECT. We attach the original query's RTEs and CTEs to the sub-SELECT Query, but data-modifying CTEs are only allowed to appear in the topmost Query. For the moment, throw an error in such cases. It would probably be possible to avoid this error by attaching the CTEs to the top INSERT Query instead; but that would require a bunch of new code to adjust ctelevelsup references. Given the narrowness of the use-case, and the need to back-patch this fix, it does not seem worth the trouble for now. We can revisit this if we get field complaints. Per report from Greg Nancarrow. Back-patch to all supported branches. (The test case added here does not fail before v10, but there are plenty of places checking top-level hasModifyingCTE in 9.6, so I have no doubt that this code change is necessary there too.) Greg Nancarrow and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJcOf-f68DT=26YAMz_i0+Au3TcLO5oiHY5=fL6Sfuits6r+_w@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJcOf-fAdj=nDKMsRhQzndm-O13NY4dL6xGcEvdX5Xvbbi0V7g@mail.gmail.com
* Consistently use "superuser" instead of "super user"Daniel Gustafsson2021-09-08
| | | | | | | | | | The correct nomenclature for the highest privileged user is superuser and not "super user", this replaces the few instances where that was used erroneously. No user-visible changes are done as all changes are in comments, so no back-patching. Author: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACW3snGBD8BAQiArMDS1Y43LuX3ymwO+N8aUg1Hrv6hYNw@mail.gmail.com
* Fix typoPeter Eisentraut2021-09-08
|
* Disable anonymous record hash support except in special casesPeter Eisentraut2021-09-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 01e658fa74 added hash support for row types. This also added support for hashing anonymous record types, using the same approach that the type cache uses for comparison support for record types: It just reports that it works, but it might fail at run time if a component type doesn't actually support the operation. We get away with that for comparison because most types support that. But some types don't support hashing, so the current state can result in failures at run time where the planner chooses hashing over sorting, whereas that previously worked if only sorting was an option. We do, however, want the record hashing support for path tracking in recursive unions, and the SEARCH and CYCLE clauses built on that. In that case, hashing is the only plan option. So enable that, this commit implements the following approach: The type cache does not report that hashing is available for the record type. This undoes that part of 01e658fa74. Instead, callers that require hashing no matter what can override that result themselves. This patch only touches the callers to make the aforementioned recursive query cases work, namely the parse analysis of unions, as well as the hash_array() function. Reported-by: Sait Talha Nisanci <sait.nisanci@microsoft.com> Bug: #17158 Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/17158-8a2ba823982537a4%40postgresql.org
* Fix incorrect format placeholdersPeter Eisentraut2021-09-08
|
* Invalidate relcache for publications defined for all tables.Amit Kapila2021-09-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Updates/Deletes on a relation were allowed even without replica identity after we define the publication for all tables. This would later lead to an error on subscribers. The reason was that for such publications we were not invalidating the relcache and the publication information for relations was not getting rebuilt. Similarly, we were not invalidating the relcache after dropping of such publications which will prohibit Updates/Deletes without replica identity even without any publication. Author: Vignesh C and Hou Zhijie Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 10, where it was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm0pF6zeWqCA8TCe2sDuwFAy8fCqba=nHampCKag-qLixg@mail.gmail.com
* Fix compilation warning in ipci.cMichael Paquier2021-09-08
| | | | | | A Size had better use %zu when printed. Oversight in bd17880, per buildfarm member lapwing.
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-08-04 07:51:25 +0000