aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Handle RLS dependencies in inlined set-returning functions properly.Tom Lane2023-05-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If an SRF in the FROM clause references a table having row-level security policies, and we inline that SRF into the calling query, we neglected to mark the plan as potentially dependent on which role is executing it. This could lead to later executions in the same session returning or hiding rows that should have been hidden or returned instead. Our thanks to Wolfgang Walther for reporting this problem. Stephen Frost and Tom Lane Security: CVE-2023-2455
* Replace last PushOverrideSearchPath() call with set_config_option().Noah Misch2023-05-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The two methods don't cooperate, so set_config_option("search_path", ...) has been ineffective under non-empty overrideStack. This defect enabled an attacker having database-level CREATE privilege to execute arbitrary code as the bootstrap superuser. While that particular attack requires v13+ for the trusted extension attribute, other attacks are feasible in all supported versions. Standardize on the combination of NewGUCNestLevel() and set_config_option("search_path", ...). It is newer than PushOverrideSearchPath(), more-prevalent, and has no known disadvantages. The "override" mechanism remains for now, for compatibility with out-of-tree code. Users should update such code, which likely suffers from the same sort of vulnerability closed here. Back-patch to v11 (all supported versions). Alexander Lakhin. Reported by Alexander Lakhin. Security: CVE-2023-2454
* Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut2023-05-08
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: https://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 5880bed52cbf5fb44921c4a42b23e3251575dcdb
* Fix typo with wait event for SLRU buffer of commit timestampsMichael Paquier2023-05-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This wait event was documented as "CommitTsBuffer" since its introduction, but the code named it "CommitTSBuffer". This commit fixes the code to follow the term documented, which is also more consistent with the naming of the other wait events used for commit timestamps. Introduced by 5da1493. Author: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e8c38840-596a-83d6-bd8d-cebc51111572@gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
* In array_position()/array_positions(), beware of empty input array.Tom Lane2023-05-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | These functions incautiously fetched the array's first lower bound even when the array is zero-dimensional, thus fetching the word after the allocated array space. While almost always harmless, with very bad luck this could result in SIGSEGV. Fix by adding an early exit for empty input. Per bug #17920 from Alexander Lakhin. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17920-f7c228c627b6d02e%40postgresql.org
* Fix crashes with CREATE SCHEMA AUTHORIZATION and schema elementsMichael Paquier2023-04-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CREATE SCHEMA AUTHORIZATION with appended schema elements can lead to crashes when comparing the schema name of the query with the schemas used in the qualification of some clauses in the elements' queries. The origin of the problem is that the transformation routine for the elements listed in a CREATE SCHEMA query uses as new, expected, schema name the one listed in CreateSchemaStmt itself. However, depending on the query, CreateSchemaStmt.schemaname may be NULL, being computed instead from the role specification of the query given by the AUTHORIZATION clause, that could be either: - A user name string, with the new schema name being set to the same value as the role given. - Guessed from CURRENT_ROLE, SESSION_ROLE or CURRENT_ROLE, with a new schema name computed from the security context where CREATE SCHEMA is running. Regression tests are added for CREATE SCHEMA with some appended elements (some of them with schema qualifications), covering also some role specification patterns. While on it, this simplifies the context structure used during the transformation of the elements listed in a CREATE SCHEMA query by removing the fields for the role specification and the role type. They were not used, and for the role specification this could be confusing as the schema name may by extracted from that at the beginning of CreateSchemaCommand(). This issue exists for a long time, so backpatch down to all the versions supported. Reported-by: Song Hongyu Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Richard Guo Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17909-f65c12dfc5f0451d@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 11
* Prevent underflow in KeepLogSeg().Nathan Bossart2023-04-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The call to XLogGetReplicationSlotMinimumLSN() might return a greater LSN than the one given to the function. Subsequent segment number calculations might then underflow, which could result in unexpected behavior when removing or recyling WAL files. This was introduced with max_slot_wal_keep_size in c655077639. To fix, skip the block of code for replication slots if the LSN is greater. Reported-by: Xu Xingwang Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi Reviewed-by: Junwang Zhao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17903-4288d439dee856c6%40postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 13
* Fix vacuum_cost_delay check for balance calculation.Daniel Gustafsson2023-04-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 1021bd6a89 excluded autovacuum workers from cost-limit balance calculations when per-relation options were set. The code checks for limit and cost_delay being greater than zero, but since cost_delay can be set to -1 the test needs to check for greater than or zero. Backpatch to all supported branches since 1021bd6a89 was backpatched all the way at the time. Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBS7o6Ljt_vfqPQPf67AhzKu3fR0iqk8B=vVYczMugKMQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: v11 (all supported branches)
* Fix custom validators call in build_local_reloptions()Alexander Korotkov2023-04-23
| | | | | | | | | | | We need to call them only when validate == true. Backpatch to 13, where opclass options were introduced. Reported-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2656633.1681831542%40sss.pgh.pa.us Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Pavel Borisov Backpatch-through: 13
* Avoid character classification in regex escape parsing.Jeff Davis2023-04-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | For regex escape sequences, just test directly for the relevant ASCII characters rather than using locale-sensitive character classification. This fixes an assertion failure when a locale considers a non-ASCII character, such as "൧", to be a digit. Reported-by: Richard Guo Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs49Q6UoKGeT8pBkMtJGJd+16CBFZaaWUk9Du+2ERE5g_YA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 11
* Avoid trying to write an empty WAL record in log_newpage_range().Tom Lane2023-04-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the last few pages in the specified range are empty (all zero), then log_newpage_range() could try to emit an empty WAL record containing no FPIs. This at least upsets an Assert in ReserveXLogInsertLocation, and might perhaps have bad real-world consequences in non-assert builds. This has been broken since log_newpage_range() was introduced, but the case was hard if not impossible to hit before commit 3d6a98457 decided it was okay to leave VM and FSM pages intentionally zero. Nonetheless, it seems prudent to back-patch. log_newpage_range() was added in v12 but later back-patched, so this affects all supported branches. Matthias van de Meent, per report from Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZD1daibg4RF50IOj@telsasoft.com
* Fix assignment to array of domain over composite, redux.Tom Lane2023-04-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 3e310d837 taught isAssignmentIndirectionExpr() to look through CoerceToDomain nodes. That's not sufficient, because since commit 04fe805a1 it's been possible for the planner to simplify CoerceToDomain to RelabelType when the domain has no constraints to enforce. So we need to look through RelabelType too. Per bug #17897 from Alexander Lakhin. Although 3e310d837 was back-patched to v11, it seems sufficient to apply this change to v12 and later, since 04fe805a1 came in in v12. Dmitry Dolgov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17897-4216c546c3874044@postgresql.org
* Fix incorrect partition pruning logic for boolean partitioned tablesDavid Rowley2023-04-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The partition pruning logic assumed that "b IS NOT true" was exactly the same as "b IS FALSE". This is not the case when considering NULL values. Fix this so we correctly include any partition which could hold NULL values for the NOT case. Additionally, this fixes a bug in the partition pruning code which handles partitioned tables partitioned like ((NOT boolcol)). This is a seemingly unlikely schema design, and it was untested and also broken. Here we add tests for the ((NOT boolcol)) case and insert some actual data into those tables and verify we do get the correct rows back when running queries. I've also adjusted the existing boolpart tests to include some data and verify we get the correct results too. Both the bugs being fixed here could lead to incorrect query results with fewer rows being returned than expected. No additional rows could have been returned accidentally. In passing, remove needless ternary expression. It's more simple just to pass !is_not_clause to makeBoolConst(). It makes sense to do this so the code is consistent with the bug fix in the "else if" condition just below. David Kimura did submit a patch to fix the first of the issues here, but that's not what's being committed here. Reported-by: David Kimura Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, David Kimura Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHnPFjQ5qxs6J_p+g8=ww7GQvfn71_JE+Tygj0S7RdRci1uwPw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 11, all supported versions
* Fix parallel-safety marking when moving initplans to another node.Tom Lane2023-04-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Our policy since commit ab77a5a45 has been that a plan node having any initplans is automatically not parallel-safe. (This could be relaxed, but not today.) clean_up_removed_plan_level neglected this, and could attach initplans to a parallel-safe child plan node without clearing the plan's parallel-safe flag. That could lead to "subplan was not initialized" errors at runtime, in case an initplan referenced another one and only the referencing one got transmitted to parallel workers. The fix in clean_up_removed_plan_level is trivial enough. materialize_finished_plan also moves initplans from one node to another, but it's okay because it already copies the source node's parallel_safe flag. The other place that does this kind of thing is standard_planner's hack to inject a top-level Gather when debug_parallel_query is active. But that's actually dead code given that we're correctly enforcing the "initplans aren't parallel safe" rule, so just replace it with an Assert that there are no initplans. Also improve some related comments. Normally we'd add a regression test case for this sort of bug. The mistake itself is already reached by existing tests, but there is accidentally no visible problem. The only known test case that creates an actual failure seems too indirect and fragile to justify keeping it as a regression test (not least because it fails to fail in v11, though the bug is clearly present there too). Per report from Justin Pryzby. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZDVt6MaNWkRDO1LQ@telsasoft.com
* Fix ts_headline() edge cases for empty query and empty search text.Tom Lane2023-04-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | tsquery's GETQUERY() macro is only safe to apply to a tsquery that is known non-empty; otherwise it gives a pointer to garbage. Before commit 5a617d75d, ts_headline() avoided this pitfall, but only in a very indirect, nonobvious way. (hlCover could not reach its TS_execute call, because if the query contains no lexemes then hlFirstIndex would surely return -1.) After that commit, it fell into the trap, resulting in weird errors such as "unrecognized operator" and/or valgrind complaints. In HEAD, fix this by not calling TS_execute_locations() at all for an empty query. In the back branches, add a defensive check to hlCover() --- that's not fixing any live bug, but I judge the code a bit too fragile as-is. Also, both mark_hl_fragments() and mark_hl_words() were careless about the possibility of empty search text: in the cases where no match has been found, they'd end up telling mark_fragment() to mark from word indexes 0 to 0 inclusive, even when there is no word 0. This is harmless since we over-allocated the prs->words array, but it does annoy valgrind. Fix so that the end index is -1 and thus mark_fragment() will do nothing in such cases. Bottom line is that this fixes a live bug in HEAD, but in the back branches it's only getting rid of a valgrind nitpick. Back-patch anyway. Per report from Alexander Lakhin. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c27f642d-020b-01ff-ae61-086af287c4fd@gmail.com
* Fix another issue with ENABLE/DISABLE TRIGGER on partitioned tables.Tom Lane2023-04-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In v13 and v14, the ENABLE/DISABLE TRIGGER USER variant malfunctioned on cloned triggers, failing to find the clones because it thought they were system triggers. Other variants of ENABLE/DISABLE TRIGGER would improperly apply a superuserness check. Fix by adjusting the is-it- a-system-trigger check to match reality in those branches. (As far as I can find, this is the only place that got it wrong.) There's no such bug in v15/HEAD, because we revised the catalog representation of system triggers to be what this code was expecting. However, add the test case to these branches anyway, because this area is visibly pretty fragile. Also remove an obsoleted comment. The recent v15/HEAD commit 6949b921d fixed a nearby bug. I now see that my commit message for that was inaccurate: the behavior of recursing to clone triggers is older than v15, but it didn't apply to the case in v13/v14 because in those branches parent partitioned tables have no pg_trigger entries for foreign-key triggers. But add the test case from that commit to v13/v14, just to show what is happening there. Per bug #17886 from DzmitryH. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17886-5406d5d828aa4aa3@postgresql.org
* Reject system columns as elements of foreign keys.Tom Lane2023-03-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Up through v11 it was sensible to use the "oid" system column as a foreign key column, but since that was removed there's no visible usefulness in making any of the remaining system columns a foreign key. Moreover, since the TupleTableSlot rewrites in v12, such cases actively fail because of implicit assumptions that only user columns appear in foreign keys. The lack of complaints about that seems like good evidence that no one is trying to do it. Hence, rather than trying to repair those assumptions (of which there are at least two, maybe more), let's just forbid the case up front. Per this patch, a system column in either the referenced or referencing side of a foreign key will draw this error; however, putting one in the referenced side would have failed later anyway, since we don't allow unique indexes to be made on system columns. Per bug #17877 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to v12; the case still appears to work in v11, so we shouldn't break it there. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17877-4bcc658e33df6de1@postgresql.org
* Ensure acquire_inherited_sample_rows sets its output parameters.Tom Lane2023-03-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | The totalrows/totaldeadrows outputs were left uninitialized in cases where we find no analyzable child tables of a partitioned table. This could lead to setting the partitioned table's pg_class.reltuples value to garbage. It's not clear that that would have any very bad effects in practice, but fix it anyway because it's making valgrind unhappy. Reported and diagnosed by Alexander Lakhin (bug #17880). Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17880-9282037c923d856e@postgresql.org
* Fix List memory issue in transformColumnDefinitionDavid Rowley2023-03-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When calling generateSerialExtraStmts(), we would pass in the constraint->options. In some cases, generateSerialExtraStmts() would modify the referenced List to remove elements from it, but doing so is invalid without assigning the list back to all variables that point to it. In the particular reported problem case, the List became empty, in which cases it became NIL, but the passed in constraint->options didn't get to find out about that and was left pointing to free'd memory. To fix this, just perform a list_copy() inside generateSerialExtraStmts(). We could just do a list_copy() just before we perform the delete from the list, however, that seems less robust. Let's make sure the generated CreateSeqStmt gets a completely different copy of the list to be safe. Bug: #17879 Reported-by: Fei Changhong Diagnosed-by: Fei Changhong Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17879-b7dfb5debee58ff5@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 11, all supported versions
* Fix dereference of dangling pointer in GiST index buffering build.Tom Lane2023-03-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | gistBuildCallback tried to fetch the size of an index tuple that might have already been freed by gistProcessEmptyingQueue. While this seems to usually be harmless in production builds, in principle it could result in a SIGSEGV, or more likely a bogus value for indtuplesSize leading to poor page-split decisions later in the build. The memory management here is confusing and could stand to be refactored, but for the moment it seems to be enough to fetch the tuple size sooner. AFAICT the indtuples[Size] totals aren't used in between these places; even if they were, the updated values shouldn't be any worse to use. So just move the incrementing of the totals up. It's not very clear why our valgrind-using buildfarm animals haven't noticed this problem, because the relevant code path does seem to be exercised according to the code coverage report. I think the reason that we didn't fix this bug after the first report is that I'd wanted to try to understand that better. However, now that it's been re-discovered let's just be pragmatic and fix it already. Original report by Alexander Lakhin (bug #16329), later rediscovered by Egor Chindyaskin (bug #17874). Patch by Alexander Lakhin (commentary by Pavel Borisov and me). Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16329-7a6aa9b6fa1118a1@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17874-63ca6c7ce42d2103@postgresql.org
* Reject attempts to alter composite types used in indexes.Tom Lane2023-03-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | find_composite_type_dependencies() ignored indexes, which is a poor decision because an expression index could have a stored column of a composite (or other container) type even when the underlying table does not. Teach it to detect such cases and error out. We have to work a bit harder than for other relations because the pg_depend entry won't identify the specific index column of concern, but it's not much new code. This does not address bug #17872's original complaint that dropping a column in such a type might lead to violations of the uniqueness property that a unique index is supposed to ensure. That seems of much less concern to me because it won't lead to crashes. Per bug #17872 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17872-d0fbb799dc3fd85d@postgresql.org
* Fix oversights in array manipulation.Tom Lane2023-03-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The nested-arrays code path in ExecEvalArrayExpr() used palloc to allocate the result array, whereas every other array-creating function has used palloc0 since 18c0b4ecc. This mostly works, but unused bits past the end of the nulls bitmap may end up undefined. That causes valgrind complaints with -DWRITE_READ_PARSE_PLAN_TREES, and could cause planner misbehavior as cited in 18c0b4ecc. There seems no very good reason why we should strive to avoid palloc0 in just this one case, so fix it the easy way with s/palloc/palloc0/. While looking at that I noted that we also failed to check for overflow of "nbytes" and "nitems" while summing the sizes of the sub-arrays, potentially allowing a crash due to undersized output allocation. For "nbytes", follow the policy used by other array-munging code of checking for overflow after each addition. (As elsewhere, the last addition of the array's overhead space doesn't need an extra check, since palloc itself will catch a value between 1Gb and 2Gb.) For "nitems", there's no very good reason to sum the inputs at all, since we can perfectly well use ArrayGetNItems' result instead of ignoring it. Per discussion of this bug, also remove redundant zeroing of the nulls bitmap in array_set_element and array_set_slice. Patch by Alexander Lakhin and myself, per bug #17858 from Alexander Lakhin; thanks also to Richard Guo. These bugs are a dozen years old, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17858-8fd287fd3663d051@postgresql.org
* Ignore generated columns during apply of update/delete.Amit Kapila2023-03-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | We fail to apply updates and deletes when the REPLICA IDENTITY FULL is used for the table having generated columns. We didn't use to ignore generated columns while doing tuple comparison among the tuples from the publisher and subscriber during apply of updates and deletes. Author: Onder Kalaci Reviewed-by: Shi yu, Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 12 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACawEhVQC9WoofunvXg12aXtbqKnEgWxoRx3+v8q32AWYsdpGg@mail.gmail.com
* Ignore dropped columns during apply of update/delete.Amit Kapila2023-03-21
| | | | | | | | | | | We fail to apply updates and deletes when the REPLICA IDENTITY FULL is used for the table having dropped columns. We didn't use to ignore dropped columns while doing tuple comparison among the tuples from the publisher and subscriber during apply of updates and deletes. Author: Onder Kalaci, Shi yu Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACawEhVQC9WoofunvXg12aXtbqKnEgWxoRx3+v8q32AWYsdpGg@mail.gmail.com
* Fix race in parallel hash join batch cleanup, take II.Thomas Munro2023-03-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | With unlucky timing and parallel_leader_participation=off (not the default), PHJ could attempt to access per-batch shared state just as it was being freed. There was code intended to prevent that by checking for a cleared pointer, but it was racy. Fix, by introducing an extra barrier phase. The new phase PHJ_BUILD_RUNNING means that it's safe to access the per-batch state to find a batch to help with, and PHJ_BUILD_DONE means that it is too late. The last to detach will free the array of per-batch state as before, but now it will also atomically advance the phase, so that late attachers can avoid the hazard. This mirrors the way per-batch hash tables are freed (see phases PHJ_BATCH_PROBING and PHJ_BATCH_DONE). An earlier attempt to fix this (commit 3b8981b6, later reverted) missed one special case. When the inner side is empty (the "empty inner optimization), the build barrier would only make it to PHJ_BUILD_HASHING_INNER phase before workers attempted to detach from the hashtable. In that case, fast-forward the build barrier to PHJ_BUILD_RUNNING before proceeding, so that our later assertions hold and we can still negotiate who is cleaning up. Revealed by build farm failures, where BarrierAttach() failed a sanity check assertion, because the memory had been clobbered by dsa_free(). In non-assert builds, the result could be a segmentation fault. Back-patch to all supported releases. Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reported-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Reported-by: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Tested-by: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200929061142.GA29096%40paquier.xyz
* Small tidyup for commit d41a178b, part II.Thomas Munro2023-03-17
| | | | | | | | | | | Further to commit 6a9229da, checking for NULL is now redundant. An "out of memory" error would have been thrown already by palloc() and treated as FATAL, so we can delete a few more lines. Back-patch to all releases, like those other commits. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4040668.1679013388%40sss.pgh.pa.us
* Work around spurious compiler warning in inet operatorsAndres Freund2023-03-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | gcc 12+ has complaints like the following: ../../../../../pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/network.c: In function 'inetnot': ../../../../../pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/network.c:1893:34: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=] 1893 | pdst[nb] = ~pip[nb]; | ~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~ ../../../../../pgsql/src/include/utils/inet.h:27:23: note: at offset -1 into destination object 'ipaddr' of size 16 27 | unsigned char ipaddr[16]; /* up to 128 bits of address */ | ^~~~~~ ../../../../../pgsql/src/include/utils/inet.h:27:23: note: at offset -1 into destination object 'ipaddr' of size 16 This is due to a compiler bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104986 It has been a year since the bug has been reported without getting fixed. As the warnings are verbose and use of gcc 12 is becoming more common, it seems worth working around the bug. Particularly because a simple reformulation of the loop condition fixes the issue and isn't any less readable. Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/144536.1648326206@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch: 11-
* Small tidyup for commit d41a178b.Thomas Munro2023-03-17
| | | | | | | | | | | A comment was left behind claiming that we needed to use malloc() rather than palloc() because the corresponding free would run in another thread, but that's not true anymore. Remove that comment. And, with the reason being gone, we might as well actually use palloc(). Back-patch to supported releases, like d41a178b. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BpdM9v3Jv4tc2BFx2jh_daY3uzUyAGBhtDkotEQDNPYw%40mail.gmail.com
* Fix waitpid() emulation on Windows.Thomas Munro2023-03-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Our waitpid() emulation didn't prevent a PID from being recycled by the OS before the call to waitpid(). The postmaster could finish up tracking more than one child process with the same PID, and confuse them. Fix, by moving the guts of pgwin32_deadchild_callback() into waitpid(), so that resources are released synchronously. The process and PID continue to exist until we close the process handle, which only happens once we're ready to adjust our book-keeping of running children. This seems to explain a couple of failures on CI. It had never been reported before, despite the code being as old as the Windows port. Perhaps Windows started recycling PIDs more rapidly, or perhaps timing changes due to commit 7389aad6 made it more likely to break. Thanks to Alexander Lakhin for analysis and Andres Freund for tracking down the root cause. Back-patch to all supported branches. Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230208012852.bvkn2am4h4iqjogq%40awork3.anarazel.de
* Fix corner case bug in numeric to_char() some more.Tom Lane2023-03-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The band-aid applied in commit f0bedf3e4 turns out to still need some work: it made sure we didn't set Np->last_relevant too small (to the left of the decimal point), but it didn't prevent setting it too large (off the end of the partially-converted string). This could result in fetching data beyond the end of the allocated space, which with very bad luck could cause a SIGSEGV, though I don't see any hazard of interesting memory disclosure. Per bug #17839 from Thiago Nunes. The bug's pretty ancient, so back-patch to all supported versions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17839-aada50db24d7b0da@postgresql.org
* Fix failure to detect some cases of improperly-nested aggregates.Tom Lane2023-03-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | check_agg_arguments_walker() supposed that it needn't descend into the arguments of a lower-level aggregate function, but this is just wrong in the presence of multiple levels of sub-select. The oversight would lead to executor failures on queries that should be rejected. (Prior to v11, they actually were rejected, thanks to a "redundant" execution-time check.) Per bug #17835 from Anban Company. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17835-4f29f3098b2d0ba4@postgresql.org
* Ensure COPY TO on an RLS-enabled table copies no more than it should.Tom Lane2023-03-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The COPY documentation is quite clear that "COPY relation TO" copies rows from only the named table, not any inheritance children it may have. However, if you enabled row-level security on the table then this stopped being true, because the code forgot to apply the ONLY modifier in the "SELECT ... FROM relation" query that it constructs in order to allow RLS predicates to be attached. Fix that. Report and patch by Antonin Houska (comment adjustments and test case by me). Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3472.1675251957@antos
* Fix race in SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY.Thomas Munro2023-03-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit bdaabb9b started skipping doomed transactions when building the list of possible conflicts for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY. That makes sense, because doomed transactions won't commit, but a couple of subtle things broke: 1. If all uncommitted r/w transactions are doomed, a READ ONLY transaction would arbitrarily not benefit from the safe snapshot optimization. It would not be taken immediately, and yet no other transaction would set SXACT_FLAG_RO_SAFE later. 2. In the same circumstances but with DEFERRABLE, GetSafeSnapshot() would correctly exit its wait loop without sleeping and then take the optimization in non-assert builds, but assert builds would fail a sanity check that SXACT_FLAG_RO_SAFE had been set by another transaction. This is similar to the case for PredXact->WritableSxactCount == 0. We should opt out immediately if our possibleUnsafeConflicts list is empty after filtering. The code to maintain the serializable global xmin is moved down below the new opt out site, because otherwise we'd have to reverse its effects before returning. Back-patch to all supported releases. Bug #17368. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17116-d6ca217acc180e30%40postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20110707212159.GF76634%40csail.mit.edu
* Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xidsAndres Freund2023-03-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When vacuum_defer_cleanup_age is bigger than the current xid, including the epoch, the subtraction of vacuum_defer_cleanup_age would lead to a wrapped around xid. While that normally is not a problem, the subsequent conversion to a 64bit xid results in a 64bit-xid very far into the future. As that xid is used as a horizon to detect whether rows versions are old enough to be removed, that allows removal of rows that are still visible (i.e. corruption). If vacuum_defer_cleanup_age was never changed from the default, there is no chance of this bug occurring. This bug was introduced in dc7420c2c92. A lesser version of it exists in 12-13, introduced by fb5344c969a, affecting only GiST. The 12-13 version of the issue can, in rare cases, lead to pages in a gist index getting recycled too early, potentially causing index entries to be found multiple times. The fix is fairly simple - don't allow vacuum_defer_cleanup_age to retreat further than FirstNormalTransactionId. Patches to make similar bugs easier to find, by adding asserts to the 64bit xid infrastructure, have been proposed, but are not suitable for backpatching. Currently there are no tests for vacuum_defer_cleanup_age. A patch introducing infrastructure to make writing a test easier has been posted to the list. Reported-by: Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230108002923.cyoser3ttmt63bfn@awork3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 12-, but impact/fix is smaller for 12-13
* Fix more bugs caused by adding columns to the end of a view.Tom Lane2023-03-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a view is defined atop another view, and then CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW is used to add columns to the lower view, then when the upper view's referencing RTE is expanded by ApplyRetrieveRule we will have a subquery RTE with fewer eref->colnames than output columns. This confuses various code that assumes those lists are always in sync, as they are in plain parser output. We have seen such problems before (cf commit d5b760ecb), and now I think the time has come to do what was speculated about in that commit: let's make ApplyRetrieveRule synthesize some column names to preserve the invariant that holds in parser output. Otherwise we'll be chasing this class of bugs indefinitely. Moreover, it appears from testing that this actually gives us better results in the test case d5b760ecb added, and likely in other corner cases that we lack coverage for. In HEAD, I replaced d5b760ecb's hack to make expandRTE exit early with an elog(ERROR) call, since the case is now presumably unreachable. But it seems like changing that in back branches would bring more risk than benefit, so there I just updated the comment. Per bug #17811 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17811-d31686b78f0dffc9@postgresql.org
* Fix some more cases of missed GENERATED-column updates.Tom Lane2023-03-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If UPDATE is forced to retry after an EvalPlanQual check, it neglected to repeat GENERATED-column computations, even though those might well have changed since we're dealing with a different tuple than before. Fixing this is mostly a matter of looping back a bit further when we retry. In v15 and HEAD that's most easily done by altering the API of ExecUpdateAct so that it includes computing GENERATED expressions. Also, if an UPDATE in a partitioned table turns into a cross-partition INSERT operation, we failed to recompute GENERATED columns. That's a bug since 8bf6ec3ba allowed partitions to have different generation expressions; although it seems to have no ill effects before that. Fixing this is messier because we can now have situations where the same query needs both the UPDATE-aligned set of GENERATED columns and the INSERT-aligned set, and it's unclear which set will be generated first (else we could hack things by forcing the INSERT-aligned set to be generated, which is indeed how fe9e658f4 made it work for MERGE). The best fix seems to be to build and store separate sets of expressions for the INSERT and UPDATE cases. That would create ABI issues in the back branches, but so far it seems we can leave this alone in the back branches. Per bug #17823 from Hisahiro Kauchi. The first part of this affects all branches back to v12 where GENERATED columns were added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17823-b64909cf7d63de84@postgresql.org
* Fix assert failures in parallel SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY.Thomas Munro2023-03-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1. Make sure that we don't decrement SxactGlobalXminCount twice when the SXACT_FLAG_RO_SAFE optimization is reached in a parallel query. This could trigger a sanity check failure in assert builds. Non-assert builds recompute the count in SetNewSxactGlobalXmin(), so the problem was hidden, explaining the lack of field reports. Add a new isolation test to exercise that case. 2. Remove an assertion that the DOOMED flag can't be set on a partially released SERIALIZABLEXACT. Instead, ignore the flag (our transaction was already determined to be read-only safe, and DOOMED is in fact set during partial release, and there was already an assertion that it wasn't set sooner). Improve an existing isolation test so that it reaches that case (previously it wasn't quite testing what it was supposed to be testing; see discussion). Back-patch to 12. Bug #17116. Defects in commit 47a338cf. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17116-d6ca217acc180e30%40postgresql.org
* Avoid fetching one past the end of translate()'s "to" parameter.Tom Lane2023-03-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is usually harmless, but if you were very unlucky it could provoke a segfault due to the "to" string being right up against the end of memory. Found via valgrind testing (so we might've found it earlier, except that our regression tests lacked any exercise of translate()'s deletion feature). Fix by switching the order of the test-for-end-of-string and advance-pointer steps. While here, compute "to_ptr + tolen" just once. (Smarter compilers might figure that out for themselves, but let's just make sure.) Report and fix by Daniil Anisimov, in bug #17816. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17816-70f3d2764e88a108@postgresql.org
* Fix MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK with partitioned target tables, yet again.Tom Lane2023-02-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We already tried to fix this in commits 3f7323cbb et al (and follow-on fixes), but now it emerges that there are still unfixed cases; moreover, these cases affect all branches not only pre-v14. I thought we had eliminated all cases of making multiple clones of an UPDATE's target list when we nuked inheritance_planner. But it turns out we still do that in some partitioned-UPDATE cases, notably including INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE, because ExecInitPartitionInfo thinks it's okay to clone and modify the parent's targetlist. This fix is based on a suggestion from Andres Freund: let's stop abusing the ParamExecData.execPlan mechanism, which was only ever meant to handle initplans, and instead solve the execution timing problem by having the expression compiler move MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK steps to the front of their expression step lists. This is feasible because (a) all branches still in support compile the entire targetlist of an UPDATE into a single ExprState, and (b) we know that all MULTIEXPR_SUBLINKs do need to be evaluated --- none could be buried inside a CASE, for example. There is a minor semantics change concerning the order of execution of the MULTIEXPR's subquery versus other parts of the parent targetlist, but that seems like something we can get away with. By doing that, we no longer need to worry about whether different clones of a MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK share output Params; their usage of that data structure won't overlap. Per bug #17800 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. In v13 and earlier, we can revert 3f7323cbb and follow-on fixes; however, I chose to keep the SubPlan.subLinkId field added in ccbb54c72. We don't need that anymore in the core code, but it's cheap enough to fill, and removing a plan node field in a minor release seems like it'd be asking for trouble. Andres Freund and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17800-ff90866b3906c964@postgresql.org
* Fix mishandling of OLD/NEW references in subqueries in rule actions.Dean Rasheed2023-02-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a rule action contains a subquery that refers to columns from OLD or NEW, then those are really lateral references, and the planner will complain if it sees such things in a subquery that isn't marked as lateral. However, at rule-definition time, the user isn't required to mark the subquery with LATERAL, and so it can fail when the rule is used. Fix this by marking such subqueries as lateral in the rewriter, at the point where they're used. Dean Rasheed and Tom Lane, per report from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5e09da43-aaba-7ea7-0a51-a2eb981b058b%40gmail.com
* Don't repeatedly register cache callbacks in pgoutput plugin.Tom Lane2023-02-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Multiple cycles of starting up and shutting down the plugin within a single session would eventually lead to "out of relcache_callback_list slots", because pgoutput_startup blindly re-registered its cache callbacks each time. Fix it to register them only once, as all other users of cache callbacks already take care to do. This has been broken all along, so back-patch to all supported branches. Shi Yu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB631004A78D743D68921FFAD3FDA79@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
* Fix multi-row DEFAULT handling for INSERT ... SELECT rules.Dean Rasheed2023-02-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Given an updatable view with a DO ALSO INSERT ... SELECT rule, a multi-row INSERT ... VALUES query on the view fails if the VALUES list contains any DEFAULTs that are not replaced by view defaults. This manifests as an "unrecognized node type" error, or an Assert failure, in an assert-enabled build. The reason is that when RewriteQuery() attempts to replace the remaining DEFAULT items with NULLs in any product queries, using rewriteValuesRTEToNulls(), it assumes that the VALUES RTE is located at the same rangetable index in each product query. However, if the product query is an INSERT ... SELECT, then the VALUES RTE is actually in the SELECT part of that query (at the same index), rather than the top-level product query itself. Fix, by descending to the SELECT in such cases. Note that we can't simply use getInsertSelectQuery() for this, since that expects to be given a raw rule action with OLD and NEW placeholder entries, so we duplicate its logic instead. While at it, beef up the checks in getInsertSelectQuery() by checking that the jointree->fromlist node is indeed a RangeTblRef, and that the RTE it points to has rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY. Per bug #17803, from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17803-53c63ed4ecb4eac6%40postgresql.org
* Fix snapshot handling in logicalmsg_decodeTomas Vondra2023-02-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Whe decoding a transactional logical message, logicalmsg_decode called SnapBuildGetOrBuildSnapshot. But we may not have a consistent snapshot yet at that point. We don't actually need the snapshot in this case (during replay we'll have the snapshot from the transaction), so in practice this is harmless. But in assert-enabled build this crashes. Fixed by requesting the snapshot only in non-transactional case, where we are guaranteed to have SNAPBUILD_CONSISTENT. Backpatch to 11. The issue exists since 9.6. Backpatch-through: 11 Reviewed-by: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/84d60912-6eab-9b84-5de3-41765a5449e8@enterprisedb.com
* Add missing support for the latest SPI status codes.Dean Rasheed2023-02-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SPI_result_code_string() was missing support for SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER, and in v15 and later, it was missing support for SPI_OK_MERGE, as was pltcl_process_SPI_result(). The last of those would trigger an error if a MERGE was executed from PL/Tcl. The others seem fairly innocuous, but worth fixing. Back-patch to all supported branches. Before v15, this is just adding SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER to SPI_result_code_string(), which is unlikely to be seen by anyone, but seems worth doing for completeness. Reviewed by Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUg8V%2BK%2BGcafOPqymxk84Y_prXgfe64PDoopjLFH6Z0Aw%40mail.gmail.com https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUMe%2B_KedPMM9AxKqm%3DSZogSxjUcrMe%2BsakusZh3BFcQw%40mail.gmail.com
* Fix erroneous Valgrind markings in AllocSetRealloc.Tom Lane2023-02-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If asked to decrease the size of a large (>8K) palloc chunk, AllocSetRealloc could improperly change the Valgrind state of memory beyond the new end of the chunk: it would mark data UNDEFINED as far as the old end of the chunk after having done the realloc(3) call, thus tromping on the state of memory that no longer belongs to it. One would normally expect that memory to now be marked NOACCESS, so that this mislabeling might prevent detection of later errors. If realloc() had chosen to move the chunk someplace else (unlikely, but well within its rights) we could also mismark perfectly-valid DEFINED data as UNDEFINED, causing false-positive valgrind reports later. Also, any malloc bookkeeping data placed within this area might now be wrongly marked, causing additional problems. Fix by replacing relevant uses of "oldsize" with "Min(size, oldsize)". It's sufficient to mark as far as "size" when that's smaller, because whatever remains in the new chunk size will be marked NOACCESS below, and we expect realloc() to have taken care of marking the memory beyond the new official end of the chunk. While we're here, also rename the function's "oldsize" variable to "oldchksize" to more clearly explain what it actually holds, namely the distance to the end of the chunk (that is, requested size plus trailing padding). This is more consistent with the use of "size" and "chksize" to hold the new requested size and chunk size. Add a new variable "oldsize" in the one stanza where we're actually talking about the old requested size. Oversight in commit c477f3e44. Back-patch to all supported branches, as that was, just in case anybody wants to do valgrind testing on back branches. Karina Litskevich Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACiT8iaAET-fmzjjZLjaJC4zwSJmrFyL7LAdHwaYyjjQOQ4hcg@mail.gmail.com
* Print the correct aliases for DML target tables in ruleutils.Tom Lane2023-02-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ruleutils.c blindly printed the user-given alias (or nothing if there hadn't been one) for the target table of INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE queries. That works a large percentage of the time, but not always: for queries appearing in WITH, it's possible that we chose a different alias to avoid conflict with outer-scope names. Since the chosen alias would be used in any Var references to the target table, this'd lead to an inconsistent printout with consequences such as dump/restore failures. The correct logic for printing (or not) a relation alias was embedded in get_from_clause_item. Factor it out to a separate function so that we don't need a jointree node to use it. (Only a limited part of that function can be reached from these new call sites, but this seems like the cleanest non-duplicative factorization.) In passing, I got rid of a redundant "\d+ rules_src" step in rules.sql. Initial report from Jonathan Katz; thanks to Vignesh C for analysis. This has been broken for a long time, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e947fa21-24b2-f922-375a-d4f763ef3e4b@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm1MMntjmT_NJGp-Z=xbF02qHGAyuSHfYHias3TqQbPF2w@mail.gmail.com
* Fix handling of SCRAM-SHA-256's channel binding with RSA-PSS certificatesMichael Paquier2023-02-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | OpenSSL 1.1.1 and newer versions have added support for RSA-PSS certificates, which requires the use of a specific routine in OpenSSL to determine which hash function to use when compiling it when using channel binding in SCRAM-SHA-256. X509_get_signature_nid(), that is the original routine the channel binding code has relied on, is not able to determine which hash algorithm to use for such certificates. However, X509_get_signature_info(), new to OpenSSL 1.1.1, is able to do it. This commit switches the channel binding logic to rely on X509_get_signature_info() over X509_get_signature_nid(), which would be the choice when building with 1.1.1 or newer. The error could have been triggered on the client or the server, hence libpq and the backend need to have their related code paths patched. Note that attempting to load an RSA-PSS certificate with OpenSSL 1.1.0 or older leads to a failure due to an unsupported algorithm. The discovery of relying on X509_get_signature_info() comes from Jacob, the tests have been written by Heikki (with few tweaks from me), while I have bundled the whole together while adding the bits needed for MSVC and meson. This issue exists since channel binding exists, so backpatch all the way down. Some tests are added in 15~, triggered if compiling with OpenSSL 1.1.1 or newer, where the certificate and key files can easily be generated for RSA-PSS. Reported-by: Gunnar "Nick" Bluth Author: Jacob Champion, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17760-b6c61e752ec07060@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 11
* Disable WindowAgg inverse transitions when subplans are presentDavid Rowley2023-02-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When an aggregate function is used as a WindowFunc and a tuple transitions out of the window frame, we ordinarily try to make use of the aggregate function's inverse transition function to "unaggregate" the exiting tuple. This optimization is disabled for various cases, including when the aggregate contains a volatile function. In such a case we'd be unable to ensure that the transition value was calculated to the same value during transitions and inverse transitions. Unfortunately, we did this check by calling contain_volatile_functions() which does not recursively search SubPlans for volatile functions. If the aggregate function's arguments or its FILTER clause contained a subplan with volatile functions then we'd fail to notice this. Here we fix this by just disabling the optimization when the WindowFunc contains any subplans. Volatile functions are not the only reason that a subplan may have nonrepeatable results. Bug: #17777 Reported-by: Anban Company Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17777-860b739b6efde977%40postgresql.org Reviewed-by: Tom Lane Backpatch-through: 11
* Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut2023-02-06
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: https://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: a7bebd06a02093ea07899fc0804adeb372126620
* Fix rare sharedtuplestore.c corruption.Thomas Munro2023-01-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the final chunk of an oversized tuple being written out to disk was exactly 32760 bytes, it would be corrupted due to a fencepost bug. Bug #17619. Back-patch to 11 where the code arrived. While testing that (see test module in archives), I (tmunro) noticed that the per-participant page counter was not initialized to zero as it should have been; that wasn't a live bug when it was written since DSM memory was originally always zeroed, but since 14 min_dynamic_shared_memory might be configured and it supplies non-zeroed memory, so that is also fixed here. Author: Dmitry Astapov <dastapov@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17619-0de62ceda812b8b5%40postgresql.org
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-08-05 23:44:36 +0000