| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When triggers are cloned from partitioned tables to their partitions,
the 'tgenabled' flag (origin/replica/always/disable) was not propagated.
Make it so that the flag on the trigger on partition is initially set to
the same value as on the partitioned table.
Add a test case to verify the behavior.
Backpatch to 11, where this appeared in commit 86f575948c77.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200930223450.GA14848@telsasoft.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When some slots are invalidated due to the max_slot_wal_keep_size limit,
the old segment horizon should move forward to stay within the limit.
However, in commit c6550776394e we forgot to call KeepLogSeg again to
recompute the horizon after invalidating replication slots. In cases
where other slots remained, the limits would be recomputed eventually
for other reasons, but if all slots were invalidated, the limits would
not move at all afterwards. Repair.
Backpatch to 13 where the feature was introduced.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Marcin Krupowicz <mk@071.ovh>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17103-004130e8f27782c9@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some commands of ALTER TABLE could fail with the following error:
ERROR: "tab" is of the wrong type
This error is unexpected, as all the code paths leading to
ATWrongRelkindError() should use a supported set of relkinds to generate
correct error messages. This commit closes the gap with such mistakes,
by adding all the missing relkind combinations. Tests are added to
check all the problems found. Note that some combinations are not used,
but these are left around as it could have an impact on applications
relying on this code.
2ed532e has done a much larger refactoring on HEAD to make such error
messages easier to manage in the long-term, so nothing is needed there.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Ahsan Hadi, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210216.181415.368926598204753659.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
41469253e went to the trouble of removing a theoretical bug from
free_sort_tuple by checking if the tuple was NULL before freeing it. Let's
make this a little more robust by also setting the tuple to NULL so that
should we be called again we won't end up doing a pfree on the already
pfree'd tuple. Per advice from Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3188192.1626136953@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 9.6, same as 41469253e
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a theoretical bug in tuplesort.c which, if a bounded sort was
used in combination with a byval Datum sort (tuplesort_begin_datum), when
switching the sort to a bounded heap in make_bounded_heap(), we'd call
free_sort_tuple(). The problem was that when sorting Datums of a byval
type, the tuple is NULL and free_sort_tuple() would free the memory for it
regardless of that. This would result in a crash.
Here we fix that simply by adding a check to see if the tuple is NULL
before trying to disassociate and free any memory belonging to it.
The reason this bug is only theoretical is that nowhere in the current
code base do we do tuplesort_set_bound() when performing a Datum sort.
However, let's backpatch a fix for this as if any extension uses the code
in this way then it's likely to cause problems.
Author: Ronan Dunklau
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpdoqNC5FjDb3KUTSMs5dg6f+XxH4Bg_dVcLi8UYAG3EQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6, oldest supported version
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should have been removed in commit 7e30c186da, which split the loop
into two. Only the first loop uses the 'from' variable; updating it in
the second loop is bogus. It was never read after the first loop, so this
was harmless and surely optimized away by the compiler, but let's be tidy.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEudQAoWq%2BAL3BnELHu7gms2GN07k-np6yLbukGaxJ1vY-zeiQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Although we were careful to lock the object being added or dropped,
we failed to get any sort of lock on the extension itself. This
allowed the ALTER to proceed in parallel with a DROP EXTENSION,
which is problematic for a couple of reasons. If both commands
succeeded we'd be left with a dangling link in pg_depend, which
would cause problems later. Also, if the ALTER failed for some
reason, it might try to print the extension's name, and that could
result in a crash or (in older branches) a silly error message
complaining about extension "(null)".
Per bug #17098 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17098-b960f3616c861f83@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If an error occurred in the wrong place, it was possible to leave an
unintialized entry in the hash table, leading to a crash. Fixed.
Also, be more careful about the order of operations so that an
allocation error doesn't leak memory in CacheMemoryContext or
unnecessarily advance NextRecordTypmod.
Backpatch through version 11. Earlier versions (prior to 35ea75632a5)
do not exhibit the problem, because an uninitialized hash entry
contains a valid empty list.
Author: Sait Talha Nisanci <Sait.Nisanci@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/HE1PR8303MB009069D476225B9A9E194B8891779@HE1PR8303MB0090.EURPRD83.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: 11
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the
result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding
the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too
many digits *before* the decimal point.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUmeFWCrq2dNzZpRj5+6LfN85jYiDoqm+ucSXhb9U2TbA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 7266d0997 added code to pull up simple constant function
results, converting the RTE_FUNCTION RTE to a dummy RTE_RESULT
RTE since it no longer need be scanned. But I forgot to clear
the LATERAL flag if the RTE has it set. If the function reduced
to a constant, it surely contains no lateral references so this
simplification is logically OK. It's needed because various other
places will Assert that RESULT RTEs aren't LATERAL.
Per bug #17097 from Yaoguang Chen. Back-patch to v13 where the
faulty code came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17097-3372ef9f798fc94f@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since the executor can't cope with a utility statement appearing
as a node of a plan tree, we can't support cases where a rewrite
rule inserts a NOTIFY into an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE command appearing
in a WITH clause of a larger query. (One can imagine ways around
that, but it'd be a new feature not a bug fix, and so far there's
been no demand for it.) RewriteQuery checked for this, but it
missed the case where the DML command rewrites to *only* a NOTIFY.
That'd lead to crashes later on in planning. Add the missed check,
and improve the level of testing of this area.
Per bug #17094 from Yaoguang Chen. It's been busted since WITH
was introduced, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17094-bf15dff55eaf2e28@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 6753333f stopped using semaphores as the sleep/wake mechanism for
heavyweight locks, but some obsolete references to that scheme remained
in comments. As with similar commit 25b93a29, back-patch all the way.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLafjB1uzXcy%3D%3D2L3cy7rjHkqOVn7qRYGBjk%3D%3DtMJE7Yg%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I accidentally missed adding this when adjusting 55fe60938 for back
patching. This adjustment was made for 9.6 to 13. 14 and master are not
affected.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvp=twCsGAGQG=A=cqOaj4mpknPBW-EZB-sd+5ZS5gCTtA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Due to how pg_size_pretty(bigint) was implemented, it's possible that when
given a negative number of bytes that the returning value would not match
the equivalent positive return value when given the equivalent positive
number of bytes. This was due to two separate issues.
1. The function used bit shifting to convert the number of bytes into
larger units. The rounding performed by bit shifting is not the same as
dividing. For example -3 >> 1 = -2, but -3 / 2 = -1. These two
operations are only equivalent with positive numbers.
2. The half_rounded() macro rounded towards positive infinity. This meant
that negative numbers rounded towards zero and positive numbers rounded
away from zero.
Here we fix #1 by dividing the values instead of bit shifting. We fix #2
by adjusting the half_rounded macro always to round away from zero.
Additionally, adjust the pg_size_pretty(numeric) function to be more
explicit that it's using division rather than bit shifting. A casual
observer might have believed bit shifting was used due to a static
function being named numeric_shift_right. However, that function was
calculating the divisor from the number of bits and performed division.
Here we make that more clear. This change is just cosmetic and does not
affect the return value of the numeric version of the function.
Here we also add a set of regression tests both versions of
pg_size_pretty() which test the values directly before and after the
function switches to the next unit.
This bug was introduced in 8a1fab36a. Prior to that negative values were
always displayed in bytes.
Author: Dean Rasheed, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCXnNW4HsmZnxhfezR5FuiGgp+mkY4AzcL5eRGO4fuadWg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6, where the bug was introduced.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 03ffc4d6d added logic to bypass all caching behavior in
LookupOpclassInfo when CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS is enabled. It doesn't
look like I stopped to think much about what that would cost, but
recent investigation shows that the cost is enormous: it roughly
doubles the time needed for cache-clobber test runs.
There does seem to be value in this behavior when trying to test
the opclass-cache loading logic itself, but for other purposes the
cost is excessive. Hence, let's back off to doing this only when
debug_invalidate_system_caches_always is at least 3; or in older
branches, when CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY is defined.
While here, clean up some other minor issues in LookupOpclassInfo.
Re-order the code so we aren't left with broken cache entries (leading
to later core dumps) in the unlikely case that we suffer OOM while
trying to allocate space for a new entry. (That seems to be my
oversight in 03ffc4d6d.) Also, in >= v13, stop allocating one array
entry too many. That's evidently left over from sloppy reversion in
851b14b0c.
Back-patch to all supported branches, mainly to reduce the runtime
of cache-clobbering buildfarm animals.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1370856.1625428625@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The existing code tried to do syscache lookups in an already-failed
transaction, which is problematic to say the least. After some
consideration of alternatives, the best fix seems to be to just drop
type names from the error message altogether. The table and column
names seem like sufficient localization. If the user is unsure what
types are involved, she can check the local and remote table
definitions.
Having done that, we can also discard the LogicalRepTypMap hash
table, which had no other use. Arguably, LOGICAL_REP_MSG_TYPE
replication messages are now obsolete as well; but we should
probably keep them in case some other use emerges. (The complexity
of removing something from the replication protocol would likely
outweigh any savings anyhow.)
Masahiko Sawada and Bharath Rupireddy, per complaint from Andres
Freund. Back-patch to v10 where this code originated.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210106020229.ne5xnuu6wlondjpe@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reaching PITR on such a transaction would cause the generation of a LOG
message mentioning a transaction committed, not aborted.
Oversight in 4f1b890.
Author: Simon Riggs
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANbhV-GJ6KijeCgdOrxqMCQ+C8QiK657EMhCy4csjrPcEUFv_Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When we cannot immediately acquire XactSLRULock in exclusive mode at
commit time, we add ourselves to a list of processes that need their XIDs
status update. We do this if the clog page where we need to update the
current transaction status is the same as the group leader's clog page,
otherwise, we allow the caller to clear it by itself. Now, when we can't
add ourselves to any group, we were not clearing the current proc if it
has already become a member of some group which was leading to an
assertion failure when the same proc was assigned to another backend after
the current backend exits.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Bug: 17072
Author: Amit Kapila
Tested-By: Alexander Lakhin
Backpatch-through: 11, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17072-2f8764857ef2c92a@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
3c84046 is the original commit that introduced index_set_state_flags(),
where the presence of SnapshotNow made necessary the use of an in-place
update. SnapshotNow has been removed in 813fb03, so there is no actual
reasons to not make this operation transactional.
As reported by Andrey, it is possible to trigger the assertion of this
routine expecting no transactional updates when switching the pg_index
state flags, using a predicate mark as immutable but calling stable or
volatile functions. 83158f7 has been around for a couple of months on
HEAD now with no issues found related to it, so it looks safe enough for
a backpatch.
Reported-by: Andrey Lepikhov
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200903080440.GA8559@paquier.xyz
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9b905019-5297-7372-0ad2-e1a4bb66a719@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's not really necessary for this function to open or lock the
relation associated with the pg_policy entry it's modifying. The
error checks it's making on the rel are if anything counterproductive
(e.g., if we don't want to allow installation of policies on system
catalogs, here is not the place to prevent that). In particular, it
seems just wrong to insist on an ownership check. That has the net
effect of forcing people to use superuser for DROP OWNED BY, which
surely is not an effect we want. Also there is no point in rebuilding
the dependencies of the policy expressions, which aren't being
changed. Lastly, locking the table also seems counterproductive; it's
not helping to prevent race conditions, since we failed to re-read the
pg_policy row after acquiring the lock. That means that concurrent
DDL would likely result in "tuple concurrently updated/deleted"
errors; which is the same behavior this code will produce, with less
overhead.
Per discussion of bug #17062. Back-patch to all supported versions,
as the failure cases this eliminates seem just as undesirable in 9.6
as in HEAD.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1573181.1624220108@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A walsender process that has executed a SQL command left the text of
that command in pg_stat_activity.query indefinitely, which is quite
confusing if it's in RUNNING state but not doing that query. An easy
and useful fix is to treat replication commands as if they were SQL
queries, and show them in pg_stat_activity according to the same rules
as for regular queries. While we're at it, it seems also sensible to
set debug_query_string, allowing error logging and debugging to see
the replication command.
While here, clean up assorted silliness in exec_replication_command:
* Clean up SQLCmd code path, and fix its only-accidentally-not-buggy
memory management.
* Remove useless duplicate call of SnapBuildClearExportedSnapshot().
* replication_scanner_finish() was never called.
Back-patch of commit f560209c6 into v10-v13. I'd originally felt
that this didn't merit back-patching, but subsequent confusion
while debugging walsender problems suggests that it'll be useful.
Also, the original commit has now aged long enough to provide some
comfort that it won't cause problems.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2673480.1624557299@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/880181.1600026471@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LLVM 13 (due out in September) has changed the semantics of
LLVMOrcAbsoluteSymbols(), so we need to bump some reference counts to
avoid a double-free that causes crashes and bad query results.
A proactive change seems necessary to avoid having a window of time
where our respective latest releases would interact badly. It's
possible that the situation could change before then, though.
Thanks to Fabien Coelho for monitoring bleeding edge LLVM and Andres
Freund for tracking down the change.
Back-patch to 11, where the JIT code arrived.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLEy8mgtN7BNp0ooFAjUedDTJj5dME7NxLU-m91b85siA%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In previous commit, I missed that relmap_redo() was also not acquiring the
RelationMappingLock. Thanks to Thomas Munro for pointing that out.
Backpatch-through: 9.6, like previous commit.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKGLev%3DPpOSaL3WRZgOvgk217et%2BbxeJcRr4eR-NttP1F6Q%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Contrary to the comment here, POSIX does not guarantee atomicity of a
read(), if another process calls write() concurrently. Or at least Linux
does not. Add locking to load_relmap_file() to avoid the race condition.
Fixes bug #17064. Thanks to Alexander Lakhin for the report and test case.
Backpatch-through: 9.6, all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17064-bb0d7904ef72add3@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Our uses of gss_display_status() and gss_display_name() assumed
that the gss_buffer_desc strings returned by those functions are
null-terminated. It appears that they generally are, given the
lack of field complaints up to now. However, the available
documentation does not promise this, and some man pages
for gss_display_status() show examples that rely on the
gss_buffer_desc.length field instead of expecting null
termination. Also, we now have a report that on some
implementations, clang's address sanitizer is of the opinion
that the byte after the specified length is undefined.
Hence, change the code to rely on the length field instead.
This might well be cosmetic rather than fixing any real bug, but
it's hard to be sure, so back-patch to all supported branches.
While here, also back-patch the v12 changes that made pg_GSS_error
deal honestly with multiple messages available from
gss_display_status.
Per report from Sudheer H R.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5372B6D4-8276-42C0-B8FB-BD0918826FC3@tekenlight.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If users provide old style pre-standardized Windows locale names in a
CREATE COLLATION command, the OS is unable to provide version
information. Continue without capturing version information, rather
than exposing an OS error.
This was originally done in commit 9f12a3b9 for 14 only, to support
future features that might encounter old style names from initdb's
default. It wasn't done in 13 because I didn't consider that users
might actually want to use the old format explicitly (something we
should consider blocking in a future release with a better error
message, but that's not a policy we've decided on yet).
Back-patch to 13, based on the field complaint in pgsql-bugs #17058.
Reported-by: Yasushi Yamashita <developer@yamashi-ta.jp>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17058-b49f5793c912c5aa%40postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ordinarily, a pg_policy.polroles array wouldn't list the same role
more than once; but CREATE POLICY does not prevent that. If we
perform DROP OWNED BY on a role that is listed more than once,
RemoveRoleFromObjectPolicy either suffered an assertion failure
or encountered a tuple-updated-by-self error. Rewrite it to cope
correctly with duplicate entries, and add a CommandCounterIncrement
call to prevent the other problem.
Per discussion, there's other cleanup that ought to happen here,
but this seems like the minimum essential fix.
Per bug #17062 from Alexander Lakhin. It's been broken all along,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17062-11f471ae3199ca23@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This works fine in the "simple Query" code path; but if the
statement is in the plan cache then it's corrupted for future
re-execution. Apply copyObject() to protect the original
tree from modification, as we've done elsewhere.
This narrow fix is applied only to the back branches. In HEAD,
the problem was fixed more generally by commit 7c337b6b5; but
that changed ProcessUtility's API, so it's infeasible to
back-patch.
Per bug #17053 from Charles Samborski.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/931771.1623893989@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17053-3ca3f501bbc212b4@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The fast default code added in Release 11 omitted to check that the
table a fast default was being added to was a plain table. Thus one
could be added to a foreign table, which predicably blows up. Here we
perform that check.
In addition, on the back branches, since some of these might have
escaped into the wild, if we encounter a missing value for
an attribute of something other than a plain table we ignore it.
Fixes bug #17056
Backpatch to release 11,
Reviewed by: Andres Freund, Álvaro Herrera and Tom Lane
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We use a tuple conversion map for partitions when replicating using an
ancestor's schema to convert tuples from partition's type to the
ancestor's. Before this map got initialized, we were processing
invalidation messages which access this map.
This issue happens only in version 13 as in HEAD we already have a code
that initializes each relation entry before we can process any
invalidation message. This issue is introduced by commit d250568121 in
version 13.
Reported-by: Tom Lane, as per buildfarm meber skink
Author: Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/648020.1623854904@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One of the error paths left *members uninitialized. That's not a live
bug, because most callers don't look at *members when the function
returns -1, but let's be tidy. One caller, in heap_lock_tuple(), does
"if (members != NULL) pfree(members)", but AFAICS it never passes an
invalid 'multi' value so it should not reach that error case.
The callers are also a bit inconsistent in their expectations.
heap_lock_tuple() pfrees the 'members' array if it's not-NULL, others
pfree() it if "nmembers >= 0", and others if "nmembers > 0". That's
not a live bug either, because the function should never return 0, but
add an Assert for that to make it more clear. I left the callers alone
for now.
I also moved the line where we set *nmembers. It wasn't wrong before,
but I like to do that right next to the 'return' statement, to make it
clear that it's always set on return.
Also remove one unreachable return statement after ereport(ERROR), for
brevity and for consistency with the similar if-block right after it.
Author: Greg Nancarrow with the additional changes by me
Backpatch-through: 9.6, all supported versions
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When stuffing a plan from the plancache into a Portal, one is
not supposed to risk throwing an error between GetCachedPlan and
PortalDefineQuery; if that happens, the plan refcount incremented
by GetCachedPlan will be leaked. I managed to break this rule
while refactoring code in 9dbf2b7d7. There is no visible
consequence other than some memory leakage, and since nobody is
very likely to trigger the relevant error conditions many times
in a row, it's not surprising we haven't noticed. Nonetheless,
it's a bug, so rearrange the order of operations to remove the
hazard.
Noted on the way to looking for a better fix for bug #17053.
This mistake is pretty old, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since commit c24dcd0cfd, we have been using pg_pread() to read the WAL
file, which doesn't change the seek position (unless we fall back to
the implementation in src/port/pread.c). Update comment accordingly.
Backpatch-through: 12, where we started to use pg_pread()
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
During decoding for speculative inserts, we were relying for cleaning
toast hash on confirmation records or next change records. But that
could lead to multiple problems (a) memory leak if there is neither a
confirmation record nor any other record after toast insertion for a
speculative insert in the transaction, (b) error and assertion failures
if the next operation is not an insert/update on the same table.
The fix is to start queuing spec abort change and clean up toast hash
and change record during its processing. Currently, we are queuing the
spec aborts for both toast and main table even though we perform cleanup
while processing the main table's spec abort record. Later, if we have a
way to distinguish between the spec abort record of toast and the main
table, we can avoid queuing the change for spec aborts of toast tables.
Reported-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAExHW5sPKF-Oovx_qZe4p5oM6Dvof7_P+XgsNAViug15Fm99jA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, a zero value for the relfilenode resulted in
a confusing error message about "unexpected duplicate".
This function returns NULL for other invalid relfilenode
values, so zero should be treated likewise.
It's been like this all along, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210612023324.GT16435@telsasoft.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using an Assert to check the validity of incoming messages is an
extremely poor decision. In a debug build, it should not be that easy
for a broken or malicious remote client to crash the logrep worker.
The consequences could be even worse in non-debug builds, which will
fail to make such checks at all, leading to who-knows-what misbehavior.
Hence, promote every Assert that could possibly be triggered by wrong
or out-of-order replication messages to a full test-and-ereport.
To avoid bloating the set of messages the translation team has to cope
with, establish a policy that replication protocol violation error
reports don't need to be translated. Hence, all the new messages here
use errmsg_internal(). A couple of old messages are changed likewise
for consistency.
Along the way, fix some non-idiomatic or outright wrong uses of
hash_search().
Most of these mistakes are new with the "streaming replication"
patch (commit 464824323), but a couple go back a long way.
Back-patch as appropriate.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1719083.1623351052@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were already reporting it, but only after the parallel workers were
finished, which is visibly much later than what happens in a serial
build.
With this change we report it when the leader starts its own sort phase
when participating in the build (the normal case). Now this might
happen a little later than when the workers start their sorting phases,
but a) communicating the actual phase start from workers is likely to be
a hassle, and b) the sort phase start is pretty fuzzy anyway, since
sorting per se is actually initiated by tuplesort.c internally earlier
than tuplesort_performsort() is called.
Backpatch to pg12, where the progress reporting code for CREATE INDEX
went in.
Reported-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Author: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1128176d-1eee-55d4-37ca-e63644422adb
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
apply_handle_tuple_routing(), having detected and reported that
the tuple it needed to update didn't exist, tried to update that
tuple anyway, leading to a null-pointer dereference.
logicalrep_partition_open() failed to ensure that the
LogicalRepPartMapEntry it built for a partition was fully
independent of that for the partition root, leading to
trouble if the root entry was later freed or rebuilt.
Meanwhile, on the publisher's side, pgoutput_change() sometimes
attempted to apply execute_attr_map_tuple() to a NULL tuple.
The first of these was reported by Sergey Bernikov in bug #17055;
I found the other two while developing some test cases for this
sadly under-tested code.
Diagnosis and patch for the first issue by Amit Langote; patches
for the others by me; new test cases by me. Back-patch to v13
where this logic came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17055-9ba800ec8522668b@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code added to mark replication slots invalid in commit c6550776394e
had the race condition that a slot can be dropped or advanced
concurrently with checkpointer trying to invalidate it. Rewrite the
code to close those races.
The changes to ReplicationSlotAcquire's API added with c6550776394e are
not necessary anymore. To avoid an ABI break in released branches, this
commit leaves that unchanged; it'll be changed in a master-only commit
separately.
Backpatch to 13, where this code first appeared.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210408001037.wfmk6jud36auhfqm@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It turns out that worker.c's code path for TRUNCATE was also
careless about establishing a snapshot while executing user-defined
code, allowing the checks added by commit 84f5c2908 to fail when
a trigger is fired in that context.
We could just wrap Push/PopActiveSnapshot around the truncate call,
but it seems better to establish a policy of holding a snapshot
throughout execution of a replication step. To help with that and
possible future requirements, replace the previous ensure_transaction
calls with pairs of begin/end_replication_step calls.
Per report from Mark Dilger. Back-patch to v11, like the previous
changes.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B4A3AF82-79ED-4F4C-A4E5-CD2622098972@enterprisedb.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This only happens if (1) the new standby has no WAL available locally,
(2) the new standby is starting from the old timeline, (3) the promotion
happened in the WAL segment from which the new standby is starting,
(4) the timeline history file for the new timeline is available from
the archive but the WAL files for are not (i.e. this is a race),
(5) the WAL files for the new timeline are available via streaming,
and (6) recovery_target_timeline='latest'.
Commit ee994272ca50f70b53074f0febaec97e28f83c4e introduced this
logic and was an improvement over the previous code, but it mishandled
this case. If recovery_target_timeline='latest' and restore_command is
set, validateRecoveryParameters() can change recoveryTargetTLI to be
different from receiveTLI. If streaming is then tried afterward,
expectedTLEs gets initialized with the history of the wrong timeline.
It's supposed to be a list of entries explaining how to get to the
target timeline, but in this case it ends up with a list of entries
explaining how to get to the new standby's original timeline, which
isn't right.
Dilip Kumar and Robert Haas, reviewed by Kyotaro Horiguchi.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-sE-jr=LB8jQuxeqikd-Ux+jHiXyh4YDiZMPedgQKup0g@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PersistHoldablePortal has long assumed that it should store the
entire output of the query-to-be-persisted, which requires rewinding
and re-reading the output. This is problematic if the query is not
stable: we might get different row contents, or even a different
number of rows, which'd confuse the cursor state mightily.
In the case where the cursor is NO SCROLL, this is very easy to
solve: just store the remaining query output, without any rewinding,
and tweak the portal's cursor state to match. Aside from removing
the semantic problem, this could be significantly more efficient
than storing the whole output.
If the cursor is scrollable, there's not much we can do, but it
was already the case that scrolling a volatile query's result was
pretty unsafe. We can just document more clearly that getting
correct results from that is not guaranteed.
There are already prohibitions in place on using SCROLL with
FOR UPDATE/SHARE, which is one way for a SELECT query to have
non-stable results. We could imagine prohibiting SCROLL when
the query contains volatile functions, but that would be
expensive to enforce. Moreover, it could break applications
that work just fine, if they have functions that are in fact
stable but the user neglected to mark them so. So settle for
documenting the hazard.
While this problem has existed in some guise for a long time,
it got a lot worse in v11, which introduced the possibility
of persisting plpgsql cursors (perhaps implicit ones) even
when they violate the rules for what can be marked WITH HOLD.
Hence, I've chosen to back-patch to v11 but not further.
Per bug #17050 from Алексей Булгаков.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17050-f77aa827dc85247c@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The internal SQL queries used by REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY
include some aliases for its diff and temporary relations with
rather-generic names: diff, newdata, newdata2 and mv. Depending on the
queries used for the materialized view, using CONCURRENTLY could lead to
some internal failures if the query and those internal aliases conflict.
Those names have been chosen in 841c29c8. This commit switches instead
to a naming pattern which is less likely going to cause conflicts, based
on an idea from Thomas Munro, by appending _$ to those aliases. This is
not perfect as those new names could still conflict, but at least it has
the advantage to keep the code readable and simple while reducing the
likelihood of conflicts to be close to zero.
Reported-by: Mathis Rudolf
Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Bernd Helmle, Thomas Munro, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/109c267a-10d2-3c53-b60e-720fcf44d9e8@credativ.de
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 428b260f8 broke planning of cases where row marks are needed
(SELECT FOR UPDATE, etc) and one of the query's tables is a foreign
table that has regular table(s) as inheritance children. We got the
reverse case right, but apparently were thinking that foreign tables
couldn't be inheritance parents. Not so; so we need to be able to
add a CTID junk column while adding a new child, not only a wholerow
junk column.
Back-patch to v12 where the faulty code came in.
Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqEmo3FV1LAQ4TVyS2h1WM=kMkZUmbNuZSCnfHvMcUcPeA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This case should be disallowed, just as FOR UPDATE with a plain
GROUP BY is disallowed; FOR UPDATE only makes sense when each row
of the query result can be identified with a single table row.
However, we missed teaching CheckSelectLocking() to check
groupingSets as well as groupClause, so that it would allow
degenerate grouping sets. That resulted in a bad plan and
a null-pointer dereference in the executor.
Looking around for other instances of the same bug, the only one
I found was in examine_simple_variable(). That'd just lead to
silly estimates, but it should be fixed too.
Per private report from Yaoguang Chen.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Release memory allocated when creating the tuple-conversion map and its
component TupleDescs when its owning sync entry is invalidated.
TupleDescs must also be freed when no map is deemed necessary, to begin
with.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Author: Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Takamichi Osumi, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/MEYP282MB166933B1AB02B4FE56E82453B64D9@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
create_projection_plan contains a hidden assumption (here made
explicit by an Assert) that a projection-capable Path will yield a
projection-capable Plan. Unfortunately, that assumption is violated
only a few lines away, by create_projection_plan itself. This means
that two stacked ProjectionPaths can yield an outcome where we try to
jam the upper path's tlist into a non-projection-capable child node,
resulting in an invalid plan.
There isn't any good reason to have stacked ProjectionPaths; indeed the
whole concept is faulty, since the set of Vars/Aggs/etc needed by the
upper one wouldn't necessarily be available in the output of the lower
one, nor could the lower one create such values if they weren't
available from its input. Hence, we can fix this by adjusting
create_projection_path to strip any top-level ProjectionPath from the
subpath it's given. (This amounts to saying "oh, we changed our
minds about what we need to project here".)
The test case added here only fails in v13 and HEAD; before that, we
don't attempt to shove the Sort into the parallel part of the plan,
for reasons that aren't entirely clear to me. However, all the
directly-related code looks generally the same as far back as v11,
where the hazard was introduced (by d7c19e62a). So I've got no faith
that the same type of bug doesn't exist in v11 and v12, given the
right test case. Hence, back-patch the code changes, but not the
irrelevant test case, into those branches.
Per report from Bas Poot.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/534fca83789c4a378c7de379e9067d4f@politie.nl
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Parallel query processes that called BlessTupleDesc() for identical
tuple descriptors at the same moment could crash. There was code to
handle that rare case, but it dereferenced a bogus DSA pointer. Repair.
Back-patch to 11, where commit cc5f8136 added support for sharing tuple
descriptors in parallel queries.
Reported-by: Eric Thinnes <e.thinnes@gmx.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/99aaa2eb-e194-bf07-c29a-1a76b4f2bcf9%40gmx.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The error messages, docs, and one of the options were using
'parallel degree' to indicate parallelism used by vacuum command. We
normally use 'parallel workers' at other places so change it for parallel
vacuum accordingly.
Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWz=PYrrFXVsEKb9J1aiX4raA+UBe02hdRp_zqDkrWUiw@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SSL renegotiation is already disabled as of 48d23c72, however this does
not prevent the server to comply with a client willing to use
renegotiation. In the last couple of years, renegotiation had its set
of security issues and flaws (like the recent CVE-2021-3449), and it
could be possible to crash the backend with a client attempting
renegotiation.
This commit takes one extra step by disabling renegotiation in the
backend in the same way as SSL compression (f9264d15) or tickets
(97d3a0b0). OpenSSL 1.1.0h has added an option named
SSL_OP_NO_RENEGOTIATION able to achieve that. In older versions
there is an option called SSL3_FLAGS_NO_RENEGOTIATE_CIPHERS that
was undocumented, and could be set within the SSL object created when
the TLS connection opens, but I have decided not to use it, as it feels
trickier to rely on, and it is not official. Note that this option is
not usable in OpenSSL < 1.1.0h as the internal contents of the *SSL
object are hidden to applications.
SSL renegotiation concerns protocols up to TLSv1.2.
Per original report from Robert Haas, with a patch based on a suggestion
by Andres Freund.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YKZBXx7RhU74FlTE@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
