| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 4518c798 intended to block signals in regular backends that
allocate DSM segments, but dsm_impl_resize() is also reached by
dsm_postmaster_startup(). It's not OK to clobber the postmaster's
signal mask, so only manipulate the signal mask when under the
postmaster.
Back-patch to all releases, like 4518c798.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKNpK%3D2OMeea_AZwpLg7Bm4%3DgYWk7eDjZ5F6YbozfOf8w%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Teach this script to handle function pointer fields honestly.
Previously they were just silently ignored, but that's not likely to
be a behavior we can accept indefinitely. This mostly entails fixing
it so that a field declaration spanning multiple lines can be parsed,
because we have a bunch of such fields that're laid out that way.
But that's a good improvement in its own right.
With that change and a minor regex adjustment, the only struct it
fails to parse in the node-defining headers is A_Const, because
of the embedded union. The path of least resistance is to move
that union declaration outside the struct.
Having done those things, we can make it error out if it finds
any within-struct syntax it doesn't understand, which seems like
a pretty important property for robustness.
This commit doesn't change the output files at all; it's just in
the way of future-proofing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2593369.1657759779@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It was confusing to reuse the variable name 'entry' in two scopes.
Use distinct variable names.
Reported-by: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQArDrFyQ15Am3rgWBunGBVZFDb90onTS8SRiFAWHeiLiFA%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously we displayed "DSMFillZeroWrite" while in posix_fallocate(),
because we shared the same wait event for "mmap" and "posix" DSM types.
Let's introduce a new wait event "DSMAllocate", to be more accurate.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220711174518.yldckniicknsxgzl%40awork3.anarazel.de
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In early releases of the DSM infrastructure, it was possible to resize
segments. That was removed in release 12 by commit 3c60d0fa. Now the
ftruncate() + posix_fallocate() sequence during DSM segment creation has
a redundant step: we're always extending from zero to the desired size,
so we might as well just call posix_fallocate().
Let's also include the remaining ftruncate() call (non-Linux POSIX
systems) in the wait event reporting, for good measure.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJSm-nq8s%2B_59zb7NbFQF-OS%3DxTnTAiGLrQpuSmU2y_1A%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On Linux, we call posix_fallocate() on shm_open()'d memory to avoid
later potential SIGBUS (see commit 899bd785).
Based on field reports of systems stuck in an EINTR retry loop there,
there, we made it possible to break out of that loop via slightly odd
coding where the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() call was somewhat removed from
the loop (see commit 422952ee).
On further reflection, that was not a great choice for at least two
reasons:
1. If interrupts were held, the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() would do nothing
and the EINTR error would be surfaced to the user.
2. If EINTR was reported but neither QueryCancelPending nor
ProcDiePending was set, then we'd dutifully retry, but with a bit more
understanding of how posix_fallocate() works, it's now clear that you
can get into a loop that never terminates. posix_fallocate() is not a
function that can do some of the job and tell you about progress if it's
interrupted, it has to undo what it's done so far and report EINTR, and
if signals keep arriving faster than it can complete (cf recovery
conflict signals), you're stuck.
Therefore, for now, we'll simply block most signals to guarantee
progress. SIGQUIT is not blocked (see InitPostmasterChild()), because
its expected handler doesn't return, and unblockable signals like
SIGCONT are not expected to arrive at a high rate. For good measure,
we'll include the ftruncate() call in the blocked region, and add a
retry loop.
Back-patch to all supported releases.
Reported-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Nicola Contu <nicola.contu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220701154105.jjfutmngoedgiad3%40alvherre.pgsql
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No members of the buildfarm are using this version of Visual Studio,
resulting in all the code cleaned up here as being mostly dead, and
VS2017 is the oldest version still supported.
More versions could be cut, but the gain would be minimal, while
removing only VS2013 has the advantage to remove from the core code all
the dependencies on the value defined by _MSC_VER, where compatibility
tweaks have accumulated across the years mostly around locales and
strtof(), so that's a nice isolated cleanup.
Note that this commit additionally allows a revert of 3154e16. The
versions of Visual Studio now supported range from 2015 to 2022.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Juan José Santamaría Flecha, Tom Lane, Thomas Munro, Justin
Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YoH2IMtxcS3ncWn+@paquier.xyz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The initial version of gen_node_support.pl manually excluded most
utility statement node types from having out/read support, and
also some raw-parse-tree-only node types. That was mostly to keep
the output comparable to the old hand-maintained code. We'd like
to have out/read support for utility statements, for debugging
purposes and so that they can be included in new-style SQL functions;
so it's time to lift that restriction.
Most if not all of the previously-excluded raw-parse-tree-only node
types can appear in expression subtrees of utility statements, so
they have to be handled too.
We don't quite have full read support yet; certain custom_read_write
node types need to have their handwritten read functions implemented
before that will work.
Doing this allows us to drop the previous hack in _outQuery to not
dump the utilityStmt field in most cases, which means we no longer
need manually-maintained out/read functions for Query, so get rid
of those in favor of auto-generating them.
Fix a couple of omissions in gen_node_support.pl that are exposed
through having to handle more node types.
catversion bump forced because somebody was sloppy about the field
order in the manually-maintained Query out/read functions.
(Committers should note that almost all changes in parsenodes.h
are now grounds for a catversion bump.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, the STORAGE specification was only available in ALTER
TABLE. This makes it available in CREATE TABLE as well.
Also make the code and the documentation for STORAGE and COMPRESSION
attributes consistent.
Author: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Author: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: wenjing zeng <wjzeng2012@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/de83407a-ae3d-a8e1-a788-920eb334f25b@sigaev.ru
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't need Assert(IsA(foo, String)) right before running
strVal(foo), since strVal() already does the assertion internally (via
castNode()).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Read/out support in 5ca0fe5c8ad7 was missing/incomplete, per Tom Lane.
Again, as far as core is concerned, this is not only dead code but also
untested; however, third parties may come to rely on it, so the standard
features should work.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1548311.1657636605@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This moves the list of available languages from nls.mk into a separate
file called po/LINGUAS. Advantages:
- It keeps the parts notionally managed by programmers (nls.mk)
separate from the parts notionally managed by translators (LINGUAS).
- It's the standard practice recommended by the Gettext manual
nowadays.
- The Meson build system also supports this layout (and of course
doesn't know anything about our custom nls.mk), so this would enable
sharing the list of languages between the two build systems.
(The MSVC build system currently finds all po files by globbing, so it
is not affected by this change.)
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/557a9f5c-e871-edc7-2f58-a4140fb65b7b@enterprisedb.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When checking for interleaved partitions, we mark the partition as
interleaved when;
1. we find an earlier partition index when looping over the
sorted-by-Datum indexes[] array, or;
2. we find that the NULL partition allows some non-NULL Datum value.
In the code, as it was written in db632fbca we'll continue to check for
case 2 when we've already marked the partition as interleaved for case 1.
Here we make it so we don't bother marking the partition as interleaved
for case 2 when it's already been marked due to case 1.
Really all this saves is a useless call to bms_add_member(), but since
this code is new to PG15, it seems worth fixing it now to save anyone the
trouble of complaining at some time in the future. We have the
opportunity to improve this now before PG15 is out. This might ease some
future back-patching pain.
Per report and patch by Zhihong Yu. However, I slightly revised the
comments and altered the bms_add_member() code to match in both locations.
We already know that index is equal to boundinfo->null_index from the if
condition.
Author: Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALNJ-vQbZR0pYxz9zQ5bqXVcwtGgNgVupeEpNT65HZ+yWZnc4g@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15, same as db632fbca.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Truncating off the end of a freshly copied List is not a very efficient
way of copying the first N elements of a List.
In many of the cases that are updated here, the pattern was only being
used to remove the final element of a List. That's about the best case
for it, but there were many instances where the truncate trimming the List
down much further.
4cc832f94 added list_copy_head(), so let's use it in cases where it's
useful.
Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1986787.1657666922%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are a few things that we could do a little better within
get_cheapest_group_keys_order():
1. We should be using list_free() rather than pfree() on a List.
2. We should use for_each_from() instead of manually coding a for loop to
skip the first n elements of a List
3. list_truncate(list_copy(...), n) is not a great way to copy the first n
elements of a list. Let's invent list_copy_head() for that. That way we
don't need to copy the entire list just to truncate it directly
afterwards.
4. We can simplify finding the cheapest cost by setting the cheapest cost
variable to DBL_MAX. That allows us to skip special-casing the initial
iteration of the loop.
Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrGyL3ft8waEkncG9y5HDMu5TFFJB1paoTC8zi9YK97Nw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15, where get_cheapest_group_keys_order was added.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Justin Pryzby reported that some scenarios could cause gathering
of extended statistics to spend many seconds in an un-cancelable
qsort() operation. To fix, invent qsort_interruptible(), which is
just like qsort_arg() except that it will also do CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
every so often. This bloats the backend by a couple of kB, which
seems like a good investment. (We considered just enabling
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in the existing qsort and qsort_arg functions,
but there are some callers for which that'd demonstrably be unsafe.
Opt-in seems like a better way.)
For now, just apply qsort_interruptible() in statistics collection.
There's probably more places where it could be useful, but we can
always change other call sites as we find problems.
Back-patch to v14. Before that we didn't have extended stats on
expressions, so that the problem was less severe. Also, this patch
depends on the sort_template infrastructure introduced in v14.
Tom Lane and Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220509000108.GQ28830@telsasoft.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Having different build systems producing different contents of the
NodeTag enum would be catastrophic for extension ABI stability.
But that ordering depends on the order in which gen_node_support.pl
processes its input files. It seems too fragile to let the Makefiles,
MSVC build scripts, and soon meson build scripts all set this order
independently. As a klugy but serviceable solution, put a canonical
copy of the file list into gen_node_support.pl itself, and check that
against the files given on the command line.
Also, while it's fine to add and delete node tags during development,
we must not let the assigned NodeTag values change unexpectedly in
stable branches. Add a cross-check that can be enabled when a branch
is forked off (or later, but that is a time when we're unlikely to
miss doing it). It just checks that the last auto-assigned number
doesn't change, which is simplistic but will catch the most likely
sorts of mistakes.
From time to time we do need to add a node tag in a stable branch.
To support doing that without changing the branch's auto-assigned
tag numbers, invent pg_node_attr(nodetag_number(VALUE)) which can
be used to give such a node a hand-assigned tag above the last
auto-assigned one.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1249010.1657574337@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows explaining gen_node_support.pl's handling of execnodes.h
and some other input files as being a shortcut for explicit marking
of all their node declarations as pg_node_attr(nodetag_only).
I foresee that someday we might need to be more fine-grained about
that, and this change provides the infrastructure needed to do so.
For now, it just allows removal of the script's klugy special case
for CallContext and InlineCodeBlock.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/75063.1657410615@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is definitely shorter, and hopefully clearer.
Kyotaro Horiguchi, reviewed by Dilip Kumar and by me
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20220707.174436.1885393789789795413.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit f10a025cfe97 added support for List to store Xids, but didn't
handle the new type in all cases. Add some obviously necessary pieces.
As far as I am aware, this is all dead code as far as core code is
concerned, but it seems unacceptable not to have it in case third-party
code wants to rely on this type of list. (Some parts of the List API
remain unimplemented, but that can be fixed as and when needed -- see
lack of list_intersection_oid, list_deduplicate_int as precedents.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220708164534.nbejhgt4ajz35p65@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now some foreign data wrappers support TRUNCATE command.
So it's useful to support TRUNCATE triggers on foreign tables for
audit logging or for preventing undesired truncation.
Author: Yugo Nagata
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao, Ian Lawrence Barwick
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220630193848.5b02e0d6076b86617a915682@sraoss.co.jp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Further to commit 92d70b77, let's drop the code we carry for the
following untested architectures: M68K, M88K, M32R, SuperH. We have no
idea if anything actually works there, and surely as vintage hardware
and microcontrollers they would be underpowered for modern purposes.
We could always consider re-adding SuperH based on evidence of usage and
build farm support, if someone shows up to provide it.
While here, SPARC is usually written in all caps.
Suggested-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> (the idea, not the patch)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/959917.1657522169%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactor so that log_line_prefix() is a thin wrapper over a new
function log_status_format(), and move the implementation to the
latter. Export log_status_format() so that it can be used by an
emit_log_hook.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/39c8197652f4d3050aedafae79fa5af31096505f.camel%40j-davis.com
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Alvaro Herrera
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per a question from Andres Freund. While here, also make the
list of nodetag-only files easier to compare to the full list
of input files.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220710214622.haiektrjzisob6rl@awork3.anarazel.de
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20220708.145951.382076151410075693.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove PageIsValid() and PageSizeIsValid(), which weren't used and
seem unnecessary.
Some code using these formerly-macros needs some adjustments because
it was previously playing loose with the Page vs. PageHeader types,
which is no longer possible with the functions instead of macros.
Reviewed-by: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5b558da8-99fb-0a99-83dd-f72f05388517%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
dshash.c previously maintained flags to be able to assert that you
didn't hold any partition lock. These flags could get out of sync with
reality in error scenarios.
Get rid of all that, and make assertions about the locks themselves
instead. Since LWLockHeldByMe() loops internally, we don't want to put
that inside another loop over all partition locks. Introduce a new
debugging-only interface LWLockAnyHeldByMe() to avoid that.
This problem was noted by Tom and Andres while reviewing changes to
support the new shared memory stats system, and later showed up in
reality while working on commit 389869af.
Back-patch to 11, where dshash.c arrived.
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220311012712.botrpsikaufzteyt@alap3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJ31Wce6HJ7xnVTKWjFUWQZPBngxfJVx4q0E98pDr3kAw%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The error message introduced in 3c633f3 can share the same format string
with an existing message used for JSON(), reducing the translation
effort.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220708.154135.2123613118233840495.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original comments mentioned a "parameter" as something not defined
in a fast-exit path to assume a true status. This is rather confusing
as the parameter DefElem is defined, and the intention is to check if
its value is defined. This improves both comments to mention the value
assigned to the DefElem's value instead, so as future patches are able
to catch the tweak if this code pattern gets copied around more.
Author: Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv0yWynWTmp4o34s0d98xVubys9fy=p0YXsZ5_sUcNnMw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix incorrect reporting of the location of errors (such as bogus
node attributes). Add header comments to the generated files,
containing copyright notices and reminders that they are generated
files, as we do in other file-generating scripts. Arrange to not
leave a clutter of temporary files when the script detects an error.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3843645.1657385930@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
copyfuncs.c and friends no longer seem like great places to put
high-level remarks about what's covered and what isn't. Move that
material to backend/nodes/README and other more-prominent places.
Add back (versions of) some remarks that disappeared in 2be87f092.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3843645.1657385930@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes the code sections that were ifdef'ed out by
964d01ae90c314eb31132c2e7712d5d9fc237331.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a script to automatically generate the node support functions
(copy, equal, out, and read, as well as the node tags enum) from the
struct definitions.
For each of the four node support files, it creates two include files,
e.g., copyfuncs.funcs.c and copyfuncs.switch.c, to include in the main
file. All the scaffolding of the main file stays in place.
I have tried to mostly make the coverage of the output match what is
currently there. For example, one could now do out/read coverage of
utility statement nodes, but I have manually excluded those for now.
The reason is mainly that it's easier to diff the before and after,
and adding a bunch of stuff like this might require a separate
analysis and review.
Subtyping (TidScan -> Scan) is supported.
For the hard cases, you can just write a manual function and exclude
generating one. For the not so hard cases, there is a way of
annotating struct fields to get special behaviors. For example,
pg_node_attr(equal_ignore) has the field ignored in equal functions.
(In this patch, I have only ifdef'ed out the code to could be removed,
mainly so that it won't constantly have merge conflicts. It will be
deleted in a separate patch. All the code comments that are worth
keeping from those sections have already been moved to the header
files where the structs are defined.)
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/c1097590-a6a4-486a-64b1-e1f9cc0533ce%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PostgreSQL contains the implementation of the red-black tree. The red-black
tree is the ordered data structure, and one of its advantages is the ability
to do inequality searches. This commit adds rbt_find_less() and
rbt_find_great() functions implementing these searches. While these searches
aren't yet used in the core code, they might be useful for extensions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGRrpzYE8-7GCoaPjOiL9T_HY605MRax-2jgTtLq236uksZ1Sw%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Steve Chavez, Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change should improve the code readability.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGRrpzYE8-7GCoaPjOiL9T_HY605MRax-2jgTtLq236uksZ1Sw%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Steve Chavez, Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Changed from AEXPR to A_EXPR for consistency.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2592455.1657140387%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are abstract node types that don't need to have a node tag
defined.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2592455.1657140387%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This CPU architecture has been discontinued. We already removed HP-UX
support, we never supported Windows/Itanium, and the open source
operating systems that a vintage hardware owner might hope to run have
all either ended Itanium support or never fully released support (NetBSD
may eventually). The extra code we carry for this rare ISA is now
untested. It seems like a good time to remove it.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1415825.1656893299%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
HP-UX hardware is no longer produced, build farm coverage recently
ended, and there are no known active maintainers targeting this OS.
Since there is a major rewrite of the build system in the pipeline for
PostgreSQL 16, and that requires development, testing and maintainance
for each OS and tool chain, it seems like a good time to drop support
for:
* HP-UX, the operating system.
* HP aCC, the HP-UX native compiler.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1415825.1656893299%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are documented to be the allowed types for the RETURNING clause,
but the restriction was not being enforced, which caused a segfault if
another type was specified. Add some testing for this.
Per report from a.kozhemyakin
Backpatch to release 15.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The general convention in the executor is to refer to child plans
and planstates via the outerPlan[State] and innerPlan[State]
macros, but a few places didn't do it like that. For consistency
and readability, convert all the stragglers to use the macros.
(See also commit 40f42d2a3, which did some similar cleanup a few
years ago, but missed these cases.)
Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-vYhh1xsa_veah4PUed2Xq=Ed_YH3=Mqt5A3Y=EgfCEg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is useful for debugging purposes to report the checkpoint LSN and
REDO LSN in log_checkpoints message. It can give more context while
analyzing checkpoint-related issues. pg_controldata reports the last
checkpoint LSN and REDO LSN, but having this information alongside
the log message helps analyze issues that happened previously,
connect the dots and identify the root cause.
Author: Bharath Rupireddy, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Julien Rouhaud, Nathan Bossart, Fujii Masao, Greg Stark
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWt6kqriAHrO+AJj+OmP=suwbktHT5JoYAn-nqZe2gd2g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When locking a specific named relation for a FOR [KEY] UPDATE/SHARE
clause, transformLockingClause() finds the relation to lock by
scanning the rangetable for an RTE with a matching eref->aliasname.
However, it failed to account for the visibility rules of a join RTE.
If a join RTE doesn't have a user-supplied alias, it will have a
generated eref->aliasname of "unnamed_join" that is not visible as a
relation name in the parse namespace. Such an RTE needs to be skipped,
otherwise it might be found in preference to a regular base relation
with a user-supplied alias of "unnamed_join", preventing it from being
locked.
In addition, if a join RTE doesn't have a user-supplied alias, but
does have a join_using_alias, then the RTE needs to be matched using
that alias rather than the generated eref->aliasname, otherwise a
misleading "relation not found" error will be reported rather than a
"join cannot be locked" error.
Backpatch all the way, except for the second part which only goes back
to 14, where JOIN USING aliases were added.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUY_KOBnqxbTSPf=7fz9HWPnZ5Xgb9SwYzZ8rFXe7nb=w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit bumps the runtime value of _WIN32_WINNT to be 0x0A00 for any
builds on Windows. Hence, this makes Windows 10 the minimal requirement
when running PostgreSQL under WIN32, be it for builds of Cygwin, MinGW
or Visual Studio.
The previous minimal runtime version was either Windows Vista when
building with at least Visual Studio 2015 or Windows XP for the rest.
Windows 10 is the most modern version supported by Microsoft, and per
discussion, as we don't have buildfarm members that run older versions
anymore, this is the minimal supported version that suits better for our
needs. This will actually make easier the development of some patches,
two being async I/O and large page handling by avoiding a lot of
compatibility gotchas, on platforms that have most likely few users
anyway.
It is possible to remove MIN_WINNT in win32.h and the macros
IsWindowsXXXOrGreater() that were used in the code at runtime to check
which version of Windows was getting used. The change in pg_locale.c
comes from Juan. Note that all my tests passed, and that the CI is
green. The buildfarm will quickly tell if this needs more adjustments.
Author: Michael Paquier, Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Yo7tHKD8VCkeNi71@paquier.xyz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
That comment might have been true at some point during development, but
definitely isn't anymore.
Reported-By: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Backpatch: 15-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We hadn't noticed this because it's dead code: there is no
situation where we read raw parse trees from text format.
So maybe the right fix is to remove the function altogether,
but I'll forbear for now; it's not the only dead code in
readfuncs.c, I think.
Noted while comparing existing code to the results of
Peter's auto-generation script.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
40af10b57 changed things so we make use of a generation memory context for
storing tuples to be sorted by tuplesort.c. That change does not play
nicely with the changes made in 9f03ca915 (back in 2014). That commit
changed things so that index_form_tuple() is called while switched into
the tuplestore's tuplecontext. In order to fetch the tuple from the index,
index_form_tuple() must do various memory allocations which are unrelated
to the storage of the final returned tuple. Although all of these
allocations are pfree'd, the fact that we now use a generation context
means that the memory for these pfree'd allocations won't be used again by
any other allocation due to generation.c's lack of freelists. This could
result in sorts used for building indexes exceeding maintenance_work_mem
by a very large amount.
Here we fix it so we no longer allocate anything apart from the tuple
itself into the generation context by adding a new version of
index_form_tuple named index_form_tuple_context, which can be called to
specify the MemoryContext to allocate the tuple into.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrHQkiFRHiGiAS-LMOvJN-eK-s762=tVzBz8ZqUea-a_A@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15, where 40af10b57 was added.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's no reason anymore to only drop subscription stats if associated with a
slot, now that stats drops are transactional. And since there's now no other
cleanup of stats, this would lead to stats for slot-less subscriptions to get
leaked (however most slot-less subs won't have stats).
Additionally, the comment referring to autovacuum cleaning up stats was
clearly outdated.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAwiby3HeJE7vJe16Gr75RFfJ640dyHqvsiUhyKJTXPtw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 15-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the
integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation
within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination;
or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or
occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation
based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is
confusing.
Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the
single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're
talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files
on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as
a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage".
Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about
pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other
SQL-facing things that derive their name from it.
On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For
example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be
derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode,
so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with
names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to
how they're being used in context.
Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for
future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its
current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now
declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these
are the same, but that can now more easily be changed.
Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund.
I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a
comment, and made one other minor correction.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
|