aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Fail BRIN control functions during recovery explicitlyAlvaro Herrera2018-06-14
| | | | | | | | | | | They already fail anyway, but prior to this patch they raise an ugly error message about a lock that cannot be acquired. This just improves the message. Author: Masahiko Sawada Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBZau4g4_NUf3BKNd=CdYK+xaPdtJCzvOC1TxGdTiJx_Q@mail.gmail.com Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh, Alexander Korotkov, Simon Riggs, Michaël Paquier, Álvaro Herrera
* Fix bugs in vacuum of shared rels, by keeping their relcache entries current.Andres Freund2018-06-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When vacuum processes a relation it uses the corresponding relcache entry's relfrozenxid / relminmxid as a cutoff for when to remove tuples etc. Unfortunately for nailed relations (i.e. critical system catalogs) bugs could frequently lead to the corresponding relcache entry being stale. This set of bugs could cause actual data corruption as vacuum would potentially not remove the correct row versions, potentially reviving them at a later point. After 699bf7d05c some corruptions in this vein were prevented, but the additional error checks could also trigger spuriously. Examples of such errors are: ERROR: found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ... and ERROR: found multixact ... from before relminmxid ... To be caused by this bug the errors have to occur on system catalog tables. The two bugs are: 1) Invalidations for nailed relations were ignored, based on the theory that the relcache entry for such tables doesn't change. Which is largely true, except for fields like relfrozenxid etc. This means that changes to relations vacuumed in other sessions weren't picked up by already existing sessions. Luckily autovacuum doesn't have particularly longrunning sessions. 2) For shared *and* nailed relations, the shared relcache init file was never invalidated while running. That means that for such tables (e.g. pg_authid, pg_database) it's not just already existing sessions that are affected, but even new connections are as well. That explains why the reports usually were about pg_authid et. al. To fix 1), revalidate the rd_rel portion of a relcache entry when invalid. This implies a bit of extra complexity to deal with bootstrapping, but it's not too bad. The fix for 2) is simpler, simply always remove both the shared and local init files. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180525203736.crkbg36muzxrjj5e@alap3.anarazel.de https://postgr.es/m/CAMa1XUhKSJd98JW4o9StWPrfS=11bPgG+_GDMxe25TvUY4Sugg@mail.gmail.com https://postgr.es/m/CAKMFJucqbuoDRfxPDX39WhA3vJyxweRg_zDVXzncr6+5wOguWA@mail.gmail.com https://postgr.es/m/CAGewt-ujGpMLQ09gXcUFMZaZsGJC98VXHEFbF-tpPB0fB13K+A@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 9.3-
* Fix function code in error reportAlvaro Herrera2018-06-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This bug causes a lseek() failure to be reported as a "could not open" failure in the error message, muddling bug reports. I introduced this copy-and-pasteo in commit 78e122010422. Noticed while reviewing code for bug report #15221, from lily liang. In version 10 the affected function is only used by multixact.c and commit_ts, and only in corner-case circumstances, neither of which are involved in the reported bug (a pg_subtrans failure.) Author: Álvaro Herrera
* Properly schema-qualify additional object types in getObjectDescription().Tom Lane2018-05-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Collations, conversions, extended statistics objects (in >= v10), and all four types of text search objects have schema-qualified names. getObjectDescription() ignored that and would emit just the base name of the object, potentially producing wrong or at least highly misleading output. Fix it to add the schema name whenever the object is not "visible" in the current search path, as is the rule for other schema-qualifiable object types. Although in common situations the output won't change, this seems to me (tgl) to be a bug worthy of back-patching, hence do so. Kyotaro Horiguchi, per a complaint from me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180522.182020.114074746.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Widen COPY FROM's current-line-number counter from 32 to 64 bits.Tom Lane2018-05-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Because the code for the HEADER option skips a line when this counter is zero, a very long COPY FROM WITH HEADER operation would drop a line every 2^32 lines. A lesser but still unfortunate problem is that errors would show a wrong input line number for errors occurring beyond the 2^31'st input line. While such large input streams seemed impractical when this code was first written, they're not any more. Widening the counter (and some associated variables) to uint64 should be enough to prevent problems for the foreseeable future. David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f88yh-6wwEfO6QLEEvH3BEugOq2QX1TOja0vCauoynmOQ@mail.gmail.com
* Fix SQL:2008 FETCH FIRST syntax to allow parameters.Andrew Gierth2018-05-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | OFFSET <x> ROWS FETCH FIRST <y> ROWS ONLY syntax is supposed to accept <simple value specification>, which includes parameters as well as literals. When this syntax was added all those years ago, it was done inconsistently, with <x> and <y> being different subsets of the standard syntax. Rectify that by making <x> and <y> accept the same thing, and allowing either a (signed) numeric literal or a c_expr there, which allows for parameters, variables, and parenthesized arbitrary expressions. Per bug #15200 from Lukas Eder. Backpatch all the way, since this has been broken from the start. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/877enz476l.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/152647780335.27204.16895288237122418685@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Fix unsafe usage of strerror(errno) within ereport().Tom Lane2018-05-21
| | | | | | | | This is the converse of the unsafe-usage-of-%m problem: the reason ereport/elog provide that format code is mainly to dodge the hazard of errno getting changed before control reaches functions within the arguments of the macro. I only found one instance of this hazard, but it's been there since 9.4 :-(.
* Fix error message on short read of pg_controlMagnus Hagander2018-05-18
| | | | | Instead of saying "error: success", indicate that we got a working read but it was too short.
* Fix misprocessing of equivalence classes involving record_eq().Tom Lane2018-05-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | canonicalize_ec_expression() is supposed to agree with coerce_type() as to whether a RelabelType should be inserted to make a subexpression be valid input for the operators of a given opclass. However, it did the wrong thing with named-composite-type inputs to record_eq(): it put in a RelabelType to RECORDOID, which the parser doesn't. In some cases this was harmless because all code paths involving a particular equivalence class did the same thing, but in other cases this would result in failing to recognize a composite-type expression as being a member of an equivalence class that it actually is a member of. The most obvious bad effect was to fail to recognize that an index on a composite column could provide the sort order needed for a mergejoin on that column, as reported by Teodor Sigaev. I think there might be other, subtler, cases that result in misoptimization. It also seems possible that an unwanted RelabelType would sometimes get into an emitted plan --- but because record_eq and friends don't examine the declared type of their input expressions, that would not create any visible problems. To fix, just treat RECORDOID as if it were a polymorphic type, which in some sense it is. We might want to consider formalizing that a bit more someday, but for the moment this seems to be the only place where an IsPolymorphicType() test ought to include RECORDOID as well. This has been broken for a long time, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a6b22369-e3bf-4d49-f59d-0c41d3551e81@sigaev.ru
* Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2018e.Tom Lane2018-05-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DST law changes in North Korea. Redefinition of "daylight savings" in Ireland, as well as for some past years in Namibia and Czechoslovakia. Additional historical corrections for Czechoslovakia. With this change, the IANA database models Irish timekeeping as following "standard time" in summer, and "daylight savings" in winter, so that the daylight savings offset is one hour behind standard time not one hour ahead. This does not change their UTC offset (+1:00 in summer, 0:00 in winter) nor their timezone abbreviations (IST in summer, GMT in winter), though now "IST" is more correctly read as "Irish Standard Time" not "Irish Summer Time". However, the "is_dst" column in the pg_timezone_names view will now be true in winter and false in summer for the Europe/Dublin zone. Similar changes were made for Namibia between 1994 and 2017, and for Czechoslovakia between 1946 and 1947. So far as I can find, no Postgres internal logic cares about which way tm_isdst is reported; in particular, since commit b2cbced9e we do not rely on it to decide how to interpret ambiguous timestamps during DST transitions. So I don't think this change will affect any Postgres behavior other than the timezone-view outputs. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30996.1525445902@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut2018-05-07
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 8807686cb166e570052e709ab45103c4e8ca2e29
* Fix scenario where streaming standby gets stuck at a continuation record.Heikki Linnakangas2018-05-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a continuation record is split so that its first half has already been removed from the master, and is only present in pg_wal, and there is a recycled WAL segment in the standby server that looks like it would contain the second half, recovery would get stuck. The code in XLogPageRead() incorrectly started streaming at the beginning of the WAL record, even if we had already read the first page. Backpatch to 9.4. In principle, older versions have the same problem, but without replication slots, there was no straightforward mechanism to prevent the master from recycling old WAL that was still needed by standby. Without such a mechanism, I think it's reasonable to assume that there's enough slack in how many old segments are kept around to not run into this, or you have a WAL archive. Reported by Jonathon Nelson. Analysis and patch by Kyotaro HORIGUCHI, with some extra comments by me. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACJqAM3xVz0JY1XFDKPP%2BJoJAjoGx%3DGNuOAshEDWCext7BFvCQ%40mail.gmail.com
* Add HOLD_INTERRUPTS section into FinishPreparedTransaction.Teodor Sigaev2018-05-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | If an interrupt arrives in the middle of FinishPreparedTransaction and any callback decide to call CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS (e.g. RemoveTwoPhaseFile can write a warning with ereport, which checks for interrupts) then it's possible to leave current GXact undeleted. Backpatch to all supported branches Stas Kelvich Discussion: ihttps://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3AD85097-A3F3-4EBA-99BD-C38EDF8D2949@postgrespro.ru
* Revert back-branch changes in power()'s behavior for NaN inputs.Tom Lane2018-05-02
| | | | | | | | | Per discussion, the value of fixing these bugs in the back branches doesn't outweigh the downsides of changing corner-case behavior in a minor release. Hence, revert commits 217d8f3a1 and 4d864de48 in the v10 branch and the corresponding commits in 9.3-9.6. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/75DB81BEEA95B445AE6D576A0A5C9E936A73E741@BPXM05GP.gisp.nec.co.jp
* Avoid wrong results for power() with NaN input on more platforms.Tom Lane2018-04-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Buildfarm results show that the modern POSIX rule that 1 ^ NaN = 1 is not honored on *BSD until relatively recently, and really old platforms don't believe that NaN ^ 0 = 1 either. (This is unsurprising, perhaps, since SUSv2 doesn't require either behavior.) In hopes of getting to platform independent behavior, let's deal with all the NaN-input cases explicitly in dpow(). Note that numeric_power() doesn't know either of these special cases. But since that behavior is platform-independent, I think it should be addressed separately, and probably not back-patched. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/75DB81BEEA95B445AE6D576A0A5C9E936A73E741@BPXM05GP.gisp.nec.co.jp
* Avoid wrong results for power() with NaN input on some platforms.Tom Lane2018-04-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Per spec, the result of power() should be NaN if either input is NaN. It appears that on some versions of Windows, the libc function does return NaN, but it also sets errno = EDOM, confusing our code that attempts to work around shortcomings of other platforms. Hence, add guard tests to avoid substituting a wrong result for the right one. It's been like this for a long time (and the odd behavior only appears in older MSVC releases, too) so back-patch to all supported branches. Dang Minh Huong, reviewed by David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/75DB81BEEA95B445AE6D576A0A5C9E936A73E741@BPXM05GP.gisp.nec.co.jp
* Fix race conditions when an event trigger is added concurrently with DDL.Tom Lane2018-04-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | EventTriggerTableRewrite crashed if there were table_rewrite triggers present, but there had not been when the calling command started. EventTriggerDDLCommandEnd called ddl_command_end triggers if present, even if there had been no such triggers when the calling command started, which would lead to a failure in pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands. In both cases, fix by doing nothing; it's better to wait till the next command when things will be properly initialized. In passing, remove an elog(DEBUG1) call that might have seemed interesting four years ago but surely isn't today. We found this because of intermittent failures in the buildfarm. Thanks to Alvaro Herrera and Andrew Gierth for analysis. Back-patch to 9.5; some of this code exists before that, but the specific hazards we need to guard against don't. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5767.1523995174@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Change more places to be less trusting of RestrictInfo.is_pushed_down.Tom Lane2018-04-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | On further reflection, commit e5d83995e didn't go far enough: pretty much everywhere in the planner that examines a clause's is_pushed_down flag ought to be changed to use the more complicated behavior where we also check the clause's required_relids. Otherwise we could make incorrect decisions about whether, say, a clause is safe to use as a hash clause. Some (many?) of these places are safe as-is, either because they are never reached while considering a parameterized path, or because there are additional checks that would reject a pushed-down clause anyway. However, it seems smarter to just code them all the same way rather than rely on easily-broken reasoning of that sort. In support of that, invent a new macro RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN that should be used in place of direct tests on the is_pushed_down flag. Like the previous patch, back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f8128b11-c5bf-3539-48cd-234178b2314d@proxel.se
* Fix incorrect handling of join clauses pushed into parameterized paths.Tom Lane2018-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In some cases a clause attached to an outer join can be pushed down into the outer join's RHS even though the clause is not degenerate --- this can happen if we choose to make a parameterized path for the RHS. If the clause ends up attached to a lower outer join, we'd misclassify it as being a "join filter" not a plain "filter" condition at that node, leading to wrong query results. To fix, teach extract_actual_join_clauses to examine each join clause's required_relids, not just its is_pushed_down flag. (The latter now seems vestigial, or at least in need of rethinking, but we won't do anything so invasive as redefining it in a bug-fix patch.) This has been wrong since we introduced parameterized paths in 9.2, though it's evidently hard to hit given the lack of previous reports. The test case used here involves a lateral function call, and I think that a lateral reference may be required to get the planner to select a broken plan; though I wouldn't swear to that. In any case, even if LATERAL is needed to trigger the bug, it still affects all supported branches, so back-patch to all. Per report from Andreas Karlsson. Thanks to Andrew Gierth for preliminary investigation. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f8128b11-c5bf-3539-48cd-234178b2314d@proxel.se
* Better fix for deadlock hazard in CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.Tom Lane2018-04-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 54eff5311 did not account for the possibility that we'd have a transaction snapshot due to default_transaction_isolation being set high enough to require one. The transaction snapshot is enough to hold back our advertised xmin and thus risk deadlock anyway. The only way to get rid of that snap is to start a new transaction, so let's do that instead. Also throw in an assert checking that we really have gotten to a state where no xmin is being advertised. Back-patch to 9.4, like the previous commit. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1ztk3TpQdcUNbxq93pc80FrXUjpDWLGMeVBDx71GHNwZQ@mail.gmail.com
* Fix broken collation-aware searches in SP-GiST text opclass.Tom Lane2018-04-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | spg_text_leaf_consistent() supposed that it should compare only Min(querylen, entrylen) bytes of the two strings, and then deal with any excess bytes in one string or the other by assuming the longer string is greater if the prefixes are equal. Quite aside from the fact that that's just wrong in some locales (e.g., 'ch' is not less than 'd' in cs_CZ), it also risked passing incomplete multibyte characters to strcoll(), with ensuing bad results. Instead, just pass the full strings to varstr_cmp, and let it decide what to do about unequal-length strings. Fortunately, this error doesn't imply any index corruption, it's just that searches might return the wrong set of entries. Per report from Emre Hasegeli, though this is not his patch. Thanks to Peter Geoghegan for review and discussion. This code was born broken, so back-patch to all supported branches. In HEAD, I failed to resist the temptation to do a bit of cosmetic cleanup/pgindent'ing on 710d90da1, too. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAE2gYzzb6K51VnTq5i5p52z+j9p2duEa-K1T3RrC_GQEynAKEg@mail.gmail.com
* Fix bogus affix-merging code.Tom Lane2018-04-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | NISortAffixes() compared successive compound affixes incorrectly, thus possibly failing to merge identical affixes, or (less likely) merging ones that shouldn't be merged. The user-visible effects of this are unclear, to me anyway. Per bug #15150 from Alexander Lakhin. It's been broken for a long time, so back-patch to all supported branches. Arthur Zakirov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152353327780.31225.13445405496721177988@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Ignore nextOid when replaying an ONLINE checkpoint.Tom Lane2018-04-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The nextOid value is from the start of the checkpoint and may well be stale compared to values from more recent XLOG_NEXTOID records. Previously, we adopted it anyway, allowing the OID counter to go backwards during a crash. While this should be harmless, it contributed to the severity of the bug fixed in commit 0408e1ed5, by allowing duplicate TOAST OIDs to be assigned immediately following a crash. Without this error, that issue would only have arisen when TOAST objects just younger than a multiple of 2^32 OIDs were deleted and then not vacuumed in time to avoid a conflict. Pavan Deolasee Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdOgWT2hHkYG3Wwo2cyZJq2zfs1FH0FgX-=h4OLosXHf9w@mail.gmail.com
* Do not select new object OIDs that match recently-dead entries.Tom Lane2018-04-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When selecting a new OID, we take care to avoid picking one that's already in use in the target table, so as not to create duplicates after the OID counter has wrapped around. However, up to now we used SnapshotDirty when scanning for pre-existing entries. That ignores committed-dead rows, so that we could select an OID matching a deleted-but-not-yet-vacuumed row. While that mostly worked, it has two problems: * If recently deleted, the dead row might still be visible to MVCC snapshots, creating a risk for duplicate OIDs when examining the catalogs within our own transaction. Such duplication couldn't be visible outside the object-creating transaction, though, and we've heard few if any field reports corresponding to such a symptom. * When selecting a TOAST OID, deleted toast rows definitely *are* visible to SnapshotToast, and will remain so until vacuumed away. This leads to a conflict that will manifest in errors like "unexpected chunk number 0 (expected 1) for toast value nnnnn". We've been seeing reports of such errors from the field for years, but the cause was unclear before. The fix is simple: just use SnapshotAny to search for conflicting rows. This results in a slightly longer window before object OIDs can be recycled, but that seems unlikely to create any large problems. Pavan Deolasee Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdOgWT2hHkYG3Wwo2cyZJq2zfs1FH0FgX-=h4OLosXHf9w@mail.gmail.com
* Make local copy of client hostnames in backend status array.Heikki Linnakangas2018-04-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The other strings, application_name and query string, were snapshotted to local memory in pgstat_read_current_status(), but we forgot to do that for client hostnames. As a result, the client hostname would appear to change in the local copy, if the client disconnected. Backpatch to all supported versions. Author: Edmund Horner Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMyN-kA7aOJzBmrYFdXcc7Z0NmW%2B5jBaf_m%3D_-77uRNyKC9r%3DA%40mail.gmail.com
* Fix incorrect close() call in dsm_impl_mmap().Tom Lane2018-04-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | One improbable error-exit path in this function used close() where it should have used CloseTransientFile(). This is unlikely to be hit in the field, and I think the consequences wouldn't be awful (just an elog(LOG) bleat later). But a bug is a bug, so back-patch to 9.4 where this code came in. Pan Bian Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152056616579.4966.583293218357089052@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Fix and improve pg_atomic_flag fallback implementation.Andres Freund2018-04-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The atomics fallback implementation for pg_atomic_flag was broken, returning the inverted value from pg_atomic_test_set_flag(). This was unnoticed because a) atomic flags were unused until recently b) the test code wasn't run when the fallback implementation was in use (because it didn't allow to test for some edge cases). Fix the bug, and improve the fallback so it has the same behaviour as the non-fallback implementation in the problematic edge cases. That breaks ABI compatibility in the back branches when fallbacks are in use, but given they were broken until now... Author: Andres Freund Reported-by: Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/FB948276-7B32-4B77-83E6-D00167F8EEB4@yesql.se https://postgr.es/m/20180406233854.uni2h3mbnveczl32@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.5-, where the atomics abstraction was introduced.
* Fix actual and potential double-frees around tuplesort usage.Tom Lane2018-03-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | tuplesort_gettupleslot() passed back tuples allocated in the tuplesort's own memory context, even when the caller was responsible to free them. This created a double-free hazard, because some callers might destroy the tuplesort object (via tuplesort_end) before trying to clean up the last returned tuple. To avoid this, change the API to specify that the tuple is allocated in the caller's memory context. v10 and HEAD already did things that way, but in 9.5 and 9.6 this is a live bug that can demonstrably cause crashes with some grouping-set usages. In 9.5 and 9.6, this requires doing an extra tuple copy in some cases, which is unfortunate. But the amount of refactoring needed to avoid it seems excessive for a back-patched change, especially since the cases where an extra copy happens are less performance-critical. Likewise change tuplesort_getdatum() to return pass-by-reference Datums in the caller's context not the tuplesort's context. There seem to be no live bugs among its callers, but clearly the same sort of situation could happen in future. For other tuplesort fetch routines, continue to allocate the memory in the tuplesort's context. This is a little inconsistent with what we now do for tuplesort_gettupleslot() and tuplesort_getdatum(), but that's preferable to adding new copy overhead in the back branches where it's clearly unnecessary. These other fetch routines provide the weakest possible guarantees about tuple memory lifespan from v10 on, anyway, so this actually seems more consistent overall. Adjust relevant comments to reflect these API redefinitions. Arguably, we should change the pre-9.5 branches as well, but since there are no known failure cases there, it seems not worth the risk. Peter Geoghegan, per report from Bernd Helmle. Reviewed by Kyotaro Horiguchi; thanks also to Andreas Seltenreich for extracting a self-contained test case. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1512661638.9720.34.camel@oopsware.de
* Fix thinko in commentAlvaro Herrera2018-03-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | The listed numbers disagreed with the ones being used in the symbols; but instead of just fixing the numbers in the comment, use the symbolic name instead, which seems clearer. This has been wrong all along, so apply back to 9.5 where BRIN was introduced. Reported-by: Tomas Vondra Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5ff514f2-8b1e-6366-b11c-8e2ed442562d@2ndquadrant.com
* Fix make rules that generate multiple output files.Tom Lane2018-03-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For years, our makefiles have correctly observed that "there is no correct way to write a rule that generates two files". However, what we did is to provide empty rules that "generate" the secondary output files from the primary one, and that's not right either. Depending on the details of the creating process, the primary file might end up timestamped later than one or more secondary files, causing subsequent make runs to consider the secondary file(s) out of date. That's harmless in a plain build, since make will just re-execute the empty rule and nothing happens. But it's fatal in a VPATH build, since make will expect the secondary file to be rebuilt in the build directory. This would manifest as "file not found" failures during VPATH builds from tarballs, if we were ever unlucky enough to ship a tarball with apparently out-of-date secondary files. (It's not clear whether that has ever actually happened, but it definitely could.) To ensure that secondary output files have timestamps >= their primary's, change our makefile convention to be that we provide a "touch $@" action not an empty rule. Also, make sure that this rule actually gets invoked during a distprep run, else the hazard remains. It's been like this a long time, so back-patch to all supported branches. In HEAD, I skipped the changes in src/backend/catalog/Makefile, because those rules are due to get replaced soon in the bootstrap data format patch, and there seems no need to create a merge issue for that patch. If for some reason we fail to land that patch in v11, we'll need to back-fill the changes in that one makefile from v10. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18556.1521668179@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix tuple counting in SP-GiST index build.Tom Lane2018-03-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | Count the number of tuples in the index honestly, instead of assuming that it's the same as the number of tuples in the heap. (It might be different if the index is partial.) Back-patch to all supported versions. Tomas Vondra Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3b3d8eac-c709-0d25-088e-b98339a1b28a@2ndquadrant.com
* Fix mishandling of quoted-list GUC values in pg_dump and ruleutils.c.Tom Lane2018-03-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Code that prints out the contents of setconfig or proconfig arrays in SQL format needs to handle GUC_LIST_QUOTE variables differently from other ones, because for those variables, flatten_set_variable_args() already applied a layer of quoting. The value can therefore safely be printed as-is, and indeed must be, or flatten_set_variable_args() will muck it up completely on reload. For all other GUC variables, it's necessary and sufficient to quote the value as a SQL literal. We'd recognized the need for this long ago, but mis-analyzed the need slightly, thinking that all GUC_LIST_INPUT variables needed the special treatment. That's actually wrong, since a valid value of a LIST variable might include characters that need quoting, although no existing variables accept such values. More to the point, we hadn't made any particular effort to keep the various places that deal with this up-to-date with the set of variables that actually need special treatment, meaning that we'd do the wrong thing with, for example, temp_tablespaces values. This affects dumping of SET clauses attached to functions, as well as ALTER DATABASE/ROLE SET commands. In ruleutils.c we can fix it reasonably honestly by exporting a guc.c function that allows discovering the flags for a given GUC variable. But pg_dump doesn't have easy access to that, so continue the old method of having a hard-wired list of affected variable names. At least we can fix it to have just one list not two, and update the list to match current reality. A remaining problem with this is that it only works for built-in GUC variables. pg_dump's list obvious knows nothing of third-party extensions, and even the "ask guc.c" method isn't bulletproof since the relevant extension might not be loaded. There's no obvious solution to that, so for now, we'll just have to discourage extension authors from inventing custom GUCs that need GUC_LIST_QUOTE. This has been busted for a long time, so back-patch to all supported branches. Michael Paquier and Tom Lane, reviewed by Kyotaro Horiguchi and Pavel Stehule Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180111064900.GA51030@paquier.xyz
* Fix some corner-case issues in REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY.Tom Lane2018-03-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | refresh_by_match_merge() has some issues in the way it builds a SQL query to construct the "diff" table: 1. It doesn't require the selected unique index(es) to be indimmediate. 2. It doesn't pay attention to the particular equality semantics enforced by a given index, but just assumes that they must be those of the column datatype's default btree opclass. 3. It doesn't check that the indexes are btrees. 4. It's insufficiently careful to ensure that the parser will pick the intended operator when parsing the query. (This would have been a security bug before CVE-2018-1058.) 5. It's not careful about indexes on system columns. The way to fix #4 is to make use of the existing code in ri_triggers.c for generating an arbitrary binary operator clause. I chose to move that to ruleutils.c, since that seems a more reasonable place to be exporting such functionality from than ri_triggers.c. While #1, #3, and #5 are just latent given existing feature restrictions, and #2 doesn't arise in the core system for lack of alternate opclasses with different equality behaviors, #4 seems like an issue worth back-patching. That's the bulk of the change anyway, so just back-patch the whole thing to 9.4 where this code was introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/13836.1521413227@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix performance hazard in REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY.Tom Lane2018-03-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Jeff Janes discovered that commit 7ca25b7de made one of the queries run by REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY perform badly. The root cause is bad cardinality estimation for correlated quals, but a principled solution to that problem is some way off, especially since the planner lacks any statistics about whole-row variables. Moreover, in non-error cases this query produces no rows, meaning it must be run to completion; but use of LIMIT 1 encourages the planner to pick a fast-start, slow-completion plan, exactly not what we want. Remove the LIMIT clause, and instead rely on the count parameter we pass to SPI_execute() to prevent excess work if the query does return some rows. While we've heard no field reports of planner misbehavior with this query, it could be that people are having performance issues that haven't reached the level of pain needed to cause a bug report. In any case, that LIMIT clause can't possibly do anything helpful with any existing version of the planner, and it demonstrably can cause bad choices in some cases, so back-patch to 9.4 where the code was introduced. Thomas Munro Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1z-JoGymHneGHar1cru4F1XDfHqJDzxP_CtK5cL3DOfmg@mail.gmail.com
* Fix WHERE CURRENT OF when the referenced cursor uses an index-only scan.Tom Lane2018-03-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | "UPDATE/DELETE WHERE CURRENT OF cursor_name" failed, with an error message like "cannot extract system attribute from virtual tuple", if the cursor was using a index-only scan for the target table. Fix it by digging the current TID out of the indexscan state. It seems likely that the same failure could occur for CustomScan plans and perhaps some FDW plan types, so that leaving this to be treated as an internal error with an obscure message isn't as good an idea as it first seemed. Hence, add a bit of heaptuple.c infrastructure to let us deliver a more on-topic message. I chose to make the message match what you get for the case where execCurrentOf can't identify the target scan node at all, "cursor "foo" is not a simply updatable scan of table "bar"". Perhaps it should be different, but we can always adjust that later. In the future, it might be nice to provide hooks that would let custom scan providers and/or FDWs deal with this in other ways; but that's not a suitable topic for a back-patchable bug fix. It's been like this all along, so back-patch to all supported branches. Yugo Nagata and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180201013349.937dfc5f.nagata@sraoss.co.jp
* Fix query-lifespan memory leakage in repeatedly executed hash joins.Tom Lane2018-03-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ExecHashTableCreate allocated some memory that wasn't freed by ExecHashTableDestroy, specifically the per-hash-key function information. That's not a huge amount of data, but if one runs a query that repeats a hash join enough times, it builds up. Fix by arranging for the data in question to be kept in the hashtable's hashCxt instead of leaving it "loose" in the query-lifespan executor context. (This ensures that we'll also clean up anything that the hash functions allocate in fn_mcxt.) Per report from Amit Khandekar. It's been like this forever, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9cFofAWGvcxLOxDHC=B0hjtW8yGmUsF2hdGh97CM38=7g@mail.gmail.com
* When updating reltuples after ANALYZE, just extrapolate from our sample.Tom Lane2018-03-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The existing logic for updating pg_class.reltuples trusted the sampling results only for the pages ANALYZE actually visited, preferring to believe the previous tuple density estimate for all the unvisited pages. While there's some rationale for doing that for VACUUM (first that VACUUM is likely to visit a very nonrandom subset of pages, and second that we know for sure that the unvisited pages did not change), there's no such rationale for ANALYZE: by assumption, it's looked at an unbiased random sample of the table's pages. Furthermore, in a very large table ANALYZE will have examined only a tiny fraction of the table's pages, meaning it cannot slew the overall density estimate very far at all. In a table that is physically growing, this causes reltuples to increase nearly proportionally to the change in relpages, regardless of what is actually happening in the table. This has been observed to cause reltuples to become so much larger than reality that it effectively shuts off autovacuum, whose threshold for doing anything is a fraction of reltuples. (Getting to the point where that would happen seems to require some additional, not well understood, conditions. But it's undeniable that if reltuples is seriously off in a large table, ANALYZE alone will not fix it in any reasonable number of iterations, especially not if the table is continuing to grow.) Hence, restrict the use of vac_estimate_reltuples() to VACUUM alone, and in ANALYZE, just extrapolate from the sample pages on the assumption that they provide an accurate model of the whole table. If, by very bad luck, they don't, at least another ANALYZE will fix it; in the old logic a single bad estimate could cause problems indefinitely. In HEAD, let's remove vac_estimate_reltuples' is_analyze argument altogether; it was never used for anything and now it's totally pointless. But keep it in the back branches, in case any third-party code is calling this function. Per bug #15005. Back-patch to all supported branches. David Gould, reviewed by Alexander Kuzmenkov, cosmetic changes by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180117164916.3fdcf2e9@engels
* Avoid holding AutovacuumScheduleLock while rechecking table statistics.Tom Lane2018-03-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In databases with many tables, re-fetching the statistics takes some time, so that this behavior seriously decreases the available concurrency for multiple autovac workers. There's discussion afoot about more complete fixes, but a simple and back-patchable amelioration is to claim the table and release the lock before rechecking stats. If we find out there's no longer a reason to process the table, re-taking the lock to un-claim the table is cheap enough. (This patch is quite old, but got lost amongst a discussion of more aggressive fixes. It's not clear when or if such a fix will be accepted, but in any case it'd be unlikely to get back-patched. Let's do this now so we have some improvement for the back branches.) In passing, make the normal un-claim step take AutovacuumScheduleLock not AutovacuumLock, since that is what is documented to protect the wi_tableoid field. This wasn't an actual bug in view of the fact that readers of that field hold both locks, but it creates some concurrency penalty against operations that need only AutovacuumLock. Back-patch to all supported versions. Jeff Janes Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26118.1520865816@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix improper uses of canonicalize_qual().Tom Lane2018-03-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | One of the things canonicalize_qual() does is to remove constant-NULL subexpressions of top-level AND/OR clauses. It does that on the assumption that what it's given is a top-level WHERE clause, so that NULL can be treated like FALSE. Although this is documented down inside a subroutine of canonicalize_qual(), it wasn't mentioned in the documentation of that function itself, and some callers hadn't gotten that memo. Notably, commit d007a9505 caused get_relation_constraints() to apply canonicalize_qual() to CHECK constraints. That allowed constraint exclusion to misoptimize situations in which a CHECK constraint had a provably-NULL subclause, as seen in the regression test case added here, in which a child table that should be scanned is not. (Although this thinko is ancient, the test case doesn't fail before 9.2, for reasons I've not bothered to track down in detail. There may be related cases that do fail before that.) More recently, commit f0e44751d added an independent bug by applying canonicalize_qual() to index expressions, which is even sillier since those might not even be boolean. If they are, though, I think this could lead to making incorrect index entries for affected index expressions in v10. I haven't attempted to prove that though. To fix, add an "is_check" parameter to canonicalize_qual() to specify whether it should assume WHERE or CHECK semantics, and make it perform NULL-elimination accordingly. Adjust the callers to apply the right semantics, or remove the call entirely in cases where it's not known that the expression has one or the other semantics. I also removed the call in some cases involving partition expressions, where it should be a no-op because such expressions should be canonical already ... and was a no-op, independently of whether it could in principle have done something, because it was being handed the qual in implicit-AND format which isn't what it expects. In HEAD, add an Assert to catch that type of mistake in future. This represents an API break for external callers of canonicalize_qual(). While that's intentional in HEAD to make such callers think about which case applies to them, it seems like something we probably wouldn't be thanked for in released branches. Hence, in released branches, the extra parameter is added to a new function canonicalize_qual_ext(), and canonicalize_qual() is a wrapper that retains its old behavior. Patch by me with suggestions from Dean Rasheed. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/24475.1520635069@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Refrain from duplicating data in reorderbuffersAlvaro Herrera2018-03-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a walsender exits leaving data in reorderbuffers, the next walsender that tries to decode the same transaction would append its decoded data in the same spill files without truncating it first, which effectively duplicate the data. Avoid that by removing any leftover reorderbuffer spill files when a walsender starts. Backpatch to 9.4; this bug has been there from the very beginning of logical decoding. Author: Craig Ringer, revised by me Reviewed by: Álvaro Herrera, Petr Jelínek, Masahiko Sawada
* Fix assorted issues in convert_to_scalar().Tom Lane2018-03-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If convert_to_scalar is passed a pair of datatypes it can't cope with, its former behavior was just to elog(ERROR). While this is OK so far as the core code is concerned, there's extension code that would like to use scalarltsel/scalargtsel/etc as selectivity estimators for operators that work on non-core datatypes, and this behavior is a show-stopper for that use-case. If we simply allow convert_to_scalar to return FALSE instead of outright failing, then the main logic of scalarltsel/scalargtsel will work fine for any operator that behaves like a scalar inequality comparison. The lack of conversion capability will mean that we can't estimate to better than histogram-bin-width precision, since the code will effectively assume that the comparison constant falls at the middle of its bin. But that's still a lot better than nothing. (Someday we should provide a way for extension code to supply a custom version of convert_to_scalar, but today is not that day.) While poking at this issue, we noted that the existing code for handling type bytea in convert_to_scalar is several bricks shy of a load. It assumes without checking that if the comparison value is type bytea, the bounds values are too; in the worst case this could lead to a crash. It also fails to detoast the input values, so that the comparison result is complete garbage if any input is toasted out-of-line, compressed, or even just short-header. I'm not sure how often such cases actually occur --- the bounds values, at least, are probably safe since they are elements of an array and hence can't be toasted. But that doesn't make this code OK. Back-patch to all supported branches, partly because author requested that, but mostly because of the bytea bugs. The change in API for the exposed routine convert_network_to_scalar() is theoretically a back-patch hazard, but it seems pretty unlikely that any third-party code is calling that function directly. Tomas Vondra, with some adjustments by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b68441b6-d18f-13ab-b43b-9a72188a4e02@2ndquadrant.com
* Make gistvacuumcleanup() count the actual number of index tuples.Tom Lane2018-03-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, it just returned the heap tuple count, which might be only an estimate, and would be completely the wrong thing if the index is partial. Since this function scans every index page anyway to find free pages, it's practically free to count the surviving index tuples. Let's do that and return an accurate count. This is easily visible as a wrong reltuples value for a partial GiST index following VACUUM, so back-patch to all supported branches. Andrey Borodin, reviewed by Michail Nikolaev Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/151956654251.6915.675951950408204404.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
* Use ereport not elog for some corrupt-HOT-chain reports.Tom Lane2018-03-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These errors have been seen in the field in corrupted-data situations. It seems worthwhile to report them with ERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTED, rather than the generic ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR, for the benefit of log monitoring and tools like amcheck. However, use errmsg_internal so that the text strings still aren't translated; it seems unlikely to be worth translators' time to do so. Back-patch to 9.3, like the predecessor commit d70cf811f that introduced these elog calls originally (replacing Asserts). Peter Geoghegan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzmn4-Pg-UGFwyuyK-wiTih9j32pwg_7T9iwqXpAUZr=Mg@mail.gmail.com
* Relax overly strict sanity check for upgraded ancient databasesAlvaro Herrera2018-03-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 4800f16a7ad0 added some sanity checks to ensure we don't accidentally corrupt data, but in one of them we failed to consider the effects of a database upgraded from 9.2 or earlier, where a tuple exclusively locked prior to the upgrade has a slightly different bit pattern. Fix that by using the macro that we fixed in commit 74ebba84aeb6 for similar situations. Reported-by: Alexandre Garcia Reviewed-by: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPYLKR6yxV4=pfW0Gwij7aPNiiPx+3ib4USVYnbuQdUtmkMaEA@mail.gmail.com Andres suspects that this bug may have wider ranging consequences, but I couldn't find anything.
* Fix IOS planning when only some index columns can return an attribute.Tom Lane2018-03-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since 9.5, it's possible that some but not all columns of an index support returning the indexed value for index-only scans. If the same indexed column appears in index columns that behave both ways, check_index_only() supposed that it'd be OK to do an index-only scan testing that column; but that fails if we have to recheck the indexed condition on one of the columns that doesn't support this. In principle we could make this work by remapping the recheck expressions to pull the value from a column that does support returning the indexed value. But such cases are so weird and rare that, at least for now, it doesn't seem worth the trouble. Instead, just teach check_index_only that a value is returnable only if all the index columns containing it are returnable, rather than any of them. Per report from David Pereiro Lagares. Back-patch to 9.5 where the possibility of this situation appeared. Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1516210494.1798.16.camel@nlpgo.com
* Rename base64 routines to avoid conflict with Solaris built-in functions.Tom Lane2018-02-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Solaris 11.4 has built-in functions named b64_encode and b64_decode. Rename ours to something else to avoid the conflict (fortunately, ours are static so the impact is limited). One could wish for less duplication of code in this area, but that would be a larger patch and not very suitable for back-patching. Since this is a portability fix, we want to put it into all supported branches. Report and initial patch by Rainer Orth, reviewed and adjusted a bit by Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ydd372wk28h.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
* Prevent dangling-pointer access when update trigger returns old tuple.Tom Lane2018-02-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A before-update row trigger may choose to return the "new" or "old" tuple unmodified. ExecBRUpdateTriggers failed to consider the second possibility, and would proceed to free the "old" tuple even if it was the one returned, leading to subsequent access to already-deallocated memory. In debug builds this reliably leads to an "invalid memory alloc request size" failure; in production builds it might accidentally work, but data corruption is also possible. This is a very old bug. There are probably a couple of reasons it hasn't been noticed up to now. It would be more usual to return NULL if one wanted to suppress the update action; returning "old" is significantly less efficient since the update will occur anyway. Also, none of the standard PLs would ever cause this because they all returned freshly-manufactured tuples even if they were just copying "old". But commit 4b93f5799 changed that for plpgsql, making it possible to see the bug with a plpgsql trigger. Still, this is certainly legal behavior for a trigger function, so it's ExecBRUpdateTriggers's fault not plpgsql's. It seems worth creating a test case that exercises returning "old" directly with a C-language trigger; testing this through plpgsql seems unreliable because its behavior might change again. Report and fix by Rushabh Lathia; regression test case by me. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf1P4pjiNPrMof=P_16E-DFjt457j+nH2ex3=nBTew7tXw@mail.gmail.com
* Empty search_path in Autovacuum and non-psql/pgbench clients.Noah Misch2018-02-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This makes the client programs behave as documented regardless of the connect-time search_path and regardless of user-created objects. Today, a malicious user with CREATE permission on a search_path schema can take control of certain of these clients' queries and invoke arbitrary SQL functions under the client identity, often a superuser. This is exploitable in the default configuration, where all users have CREATE privilege on schema "public". This changes behavior of user-defined code stored in the database, like pg_index.indexprs and pg_extension_config_dump(). If they reach code bearing unqualified names, "does not exist" or "no schema has been selected to create in" errors might appear. Users may fix such errors by schema-qualifying affected names. After upgrading, consider watching server logs for these errors. The --table arguments of src/bin/scripts clients have been lax; for example, "vacuumdb -Zt pg_am\;CHECKPOINT" performed a checkpoint. That now fails, but for now, "vacuumdb -Zt 'pg_am(amname);CHECKPOINT'" still performs a checkpoint. Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions). Reviewed by Tom Lane, though this fix strategy was not his first choice. Reported by Arseniy Sharoglazov. Security: CVE-2018-1058
* Avoid using unsafe search_path settings during dump and restore.Tom Lane2018-02-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Historically, pg_dump has "set search_path = foo, pg_catalog" when dumping an object in schema "foo", and has also caused that setting to be used while restoring the object. This is problematic because functions and operators in schema "foo" could capture references meant to refer to pg_catalog entries, both in the queries issued by pg_dump and those issued during the subsequent restore run. That could result in dump/restore misbehavior, or in privilege escalation if a nefarious user installs trojan-horse functions or operators. This patch changes pg_dump so that it does not change the search_path dynamically. The emitted restore script sets the search_path to what was used at dump time, and then leaves it alone thereafter. Created objects are placed in the correct schema, regardless of the active search_path, by dint of schema-qualifying their names in the CREATE commands, as well as in subsequent ALTER and ALTER-like commands. Since this change requires a change in the behavior of pg_restore when processing an archive file made according to this new convention, bump the archive file version number; old versions of pg_restore will therefore refuse to process files made with new versions of pg_dump. Security: CVE-2018-1058
* Fix planner failures with overlapping mergejoin clauses in an outer join.Tom Lane2018-02-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Given overlapping or partially redundant join clauses, for example t1 JOIN t2 ON t1.a = t2.x AND t1.b = t2.x the planner's EquivalenceClass machinery will ordinarily refactor the clauses as "t1.a = t1.b AND t1.a = t2.x", so that join processing doesn't see multiple references to the same EquivalenceClass in a list of join equality clauses. However, if the join is outer, it's incorrect to derive a restriction clause on the outer side from the join conditions, so the clause refactoring does not happen and we end up with overlapping join conditions. The code that attempted to deal with such cases had several subtle bugs, which could result in "left and right pathkeys do not match in mergejoin" or "outer pathkeys do not match mergeclauses" planner errors, if the selected join plan type was a mergejoin. (It does not appear that any actually incorrect plan could have been emitted.) The core of the problem really was failure to recognize that the outer and inner relations' pathkeys have different relationships to the mergeclause list. A join's mergeclause list is constructed by reference to the outer pathkeys, so it will always be ordered the same as the outer pathkeys, but this cannot be presumed true for the inner pathkeys. If the inner sides of the mergeclauses contain multiple references to the same EquivalenceClass ({t2.x} in the above example) then a simplistic rendering of the required inner sort order is like "ORDER BY t2.x, t2.x", but the pathkey machinery recognizes that the second sort column is redundant and throws it away. The mergejoin planning code failed to account for that behavior properly. One error was to try to generate cut-down versions of the mergeclause list from cut-down versions of the inner pathkeys in the same way as the initial construction of the mergeclause list from the outer pathkeys was done; this could lead to choosing a mergeclause list that fails to match the outer pathkeys. The other problem was that the pathkey cross-checking code in create_mergejoin_plan treated the inner and outer pathkey lists identically, whereas actually the expectations for them must be different. That led to false "pathkeys do not match" failures in some cases, and in principle could have led to failure to detect bogus plans in other cases, though there is no indication that such bogus plans could be generated. Reported by Alexander Kuzmenkov, who also reviewed this patch. This has been broken for years (back to around 8.3 according to my testing), so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5dad9160-4632-0e47-e120-8e2082000c01@postgrespro.ru