| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
loop."
This reverts commit 81069a9efc5a374dd39874a161f456f0fb3afba4.
Buildfarm results suggest that some platforms have versions of pselect(2)
that are not merely non-atomic, but flat out non-functional. Revert the
use-pselect patch to confirm this diagnosis (and exclude the no-SA_RESTART
patch as the source of trouble). If it's so, we should probably look into
blacklisting specific platforms that have broken pselect.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9696.1493072081@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Traditionally we've unblocked signals, called select(2), and then blocked
signals again. The code expects that the select() will be cancelled with
EINTR if an interrupt occurs; but there's a race condition, which is that
an already-pending signal will be delivered as soon as we unblock, and then
when we reach select() there will be nothing preventing it from waiting.
This can result in a long delay before we perform any action that
ServerLoop was supposed to have taken in response to the signal. As with
the somewhat-similar symptoms fixed by commit 893902085, the main practical
problem is slow launching of parallel workers. The window for trouble is
usually pretty short, corresponding to one iteration of ServerLoop; but
it's not negligible.
To fix, use pselect(2) in place of select(2) where available, as that's
designed to solve exactly this problem. Where not available, we continue
to use the old way, and are no worse off than before.
pselect(2) has been required by POSIX since about 2001, so most modern
platforms should have it. A bigger portability issue is that some
implementations are said to be non-atomic, ie pselect() isn't really
any different from unblock/select/reblock. Still, we're no worse off
than before on such a platform.
There is talk of rewriting the postmaster to use a WaitEventSet and
not do signal response work in signal handlers, at which point this
could be reverted, since we'd be using a self-pipe to solve the race
condition. But that's not happening before v11 at the earliest.
Back-patch to 9.6. The problem exists much further back, but the
worst symptom arises only in connection with parallel query, so it
does not seem worth taking any portability risks in older branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9205.1492833041@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The postmaster keeps signals blocked everywhere except while waiting
for something to happen in ServerLoop(). The code expects that the
select(2) will be cancelled with EINTR if an interrupt occurs; without
that, followup actions that should be performed by ServerLoop() itself
will be delayed. However, some platforms interpret the SA_RESTART
signal flag as meaning that they should restart rather than cancel
the select(2). Worse yet, some of them restart it with the original
timeout delay, meaning that a steady stream of signal interrupts can
prevent ServerLoop() from iterating at all if there are no incoming
connection requests.
Observable symptoms of this, on an affected platform such as HPUX 10,
include extremely slow parallel query startup (possibly as much as
30 seconds) and failure to update timestamps on the postmaster's sockets
and lockfiles when no new connections arrive for a long time.
We can fix this by running the postmaster's signal handlers without
SA_RESTART. That would be quite a scary change if the range of code
where signals are accepted weren't so tiny, but as it is, it seems
safe enough. (Note that postmaster children do, and must, reset all
the handlers before unblocking signals; so this change should not
affect any child process.)
There is talk of rewriting the postmaster to use a WaitEventSet and
not do signal response work in signal handlers, at which point it might
be appropriate to revert this patch. But that's not happening before
v11 at the earliest.
Back-patch to 9.6. The problem exists much further back, but the
worst symptom arises only in connection with parallel query, so it
does not seem worth taking any portability risks in older branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9205.1492833041@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This corner case didn't behave nicely at all: the postmaster would
(partially) update its state as though the process had started
successfully, and be quite confused thereafter. Fix it to act
like the worker had crashed, instead.
In passing, refactor so that do_start_bgworker contains all the
state-change logic for bgworker launch, rather than just some of it.
Back-patch as far as 9.4. 9.3 contains similar logic, but it's just
enough different that I don't feel comfortable applying the patch
without more study; and the use of bgworkers in 9.3 was so small
that it doesn't seem worth the extra work.
transam/parallel.c is still entirely unprepared for the possibility
of bgworker startup failure, but that seems like material for a
separate patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4905.1492813727@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix machine-dependent sorting of column numbers. (Odd behavior
would only materialize for column numbers above 255, but that's
certainly legal.)
Fix poor choice of SQLSTATE for some errors, and improve error message
wording. (Notably, "is not a scalar type" is a totally misleading way
to explain "does not have a default btree opclass".)
Avoid taking AccessExclusiveLock on the associated relation during DROP
STATISTICS. That's neither necessary nor desirable, and it could easily
have put us into situations where DROP fails (compare commit 68ea2b7f9).
Adjust/improve comments.
David Rowley and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f-GmCfPvBbAEaM5xoVOaYdVgVN1gicALSoYQ77z-+vLbw@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
poll.h is mandated by Single Unix Spec v2, the usual baseline for
postgres on unix. None of the unixoid buildfarms animals has
sys/poll.h but not poll.h. Therefore there's not much point to test
for sys/poll.h's existence and include it optionally.
Author: Andres Freund, per suggestion from Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20505.1492723662@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This seems to be largely cosmetic, avoiding valgrind bleats and the
like. The uninitialized padding influences the CRC of the on-disk
entry, but because it's also used when verifying the CRC, that doesn't
cause spurious failures. Backpatch nonetheless.
It's a bit unfortunate that contrib/test_decoding/sql/replorigin.sql
doesn't exercise the checkpoint path, but checkpoints are fairly
expensive on weaker machines, and we'd have to stop/start for that to
be meaningful.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170422183123.w2jgiuxtts7qrqaq@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 9.5, where replication origins were introduced
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As reported by buildfarm animal skink / valgrind, some of the
variables weren't always initialized. To avoid further mishaps use
memset to ensure the entire entry is initialized.
Author: Petr Jelinek
Reported-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170422183123.w2jgiuxtts7qrqaq@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: none, code new in master
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
poll(2) is required by Single Unix Spec v2, the usual baseline for
postgres (leaving windows aside). There's not been any buildfarm
animals without poll(2) for a long while, leaving the select(2)
implementation to be largely untested.
On windows, including mingw, poll() is not available, but we have a
special case implementation for windows anyway.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170420003611.7r2sdvehesdyiz2i@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Force overwriteOK = true while we investigate deeper fix
Proposed by Tom Lane as temporary measure, accepted by me
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug was masked by error in running 004_timeline_switch.pl that was
fixed recently in 7d68f2281a.
Detective work by Alvaro Herrera and Tom Lane
Author: Thomas Munro
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ProcessTwoPhaseBuffer (formerly StandbyRecoverPreparedTransactions)
mixed up the parent and child XIDs when calling SubTransSetParent to
record the transactions' relationship in pg_subtrans.
Remarkably, analysis by Simon Riggs suggests that this doesn't lead to
visible problems (at least, not in non-Assert builds). That might
explain why we'd not noticed it before. Nonetheless, it's surely wrong.
This code was born broken, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20110.1492905318@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The POSIX standard does not say that the success return value for
fcntl(F_SETFD) and fcntl(F_SETFL) is zero; it says only that it's not -1.
We had several calls that were making the stronger assumption. Adjust
them to test specifically for -1 for strict spec compliance.
The standard further leaves open the possibility that the O_NONBLOCK
flag bit is not the only active one in F_SETFL's argument. Formally,
therefore, one ought to get the current flags with F_GETFL and store
them back with only the O_NONBLOCK bit changed when trying to change
the nonblock state. In port/noblock.c, we were doing the full pushup
in pg_set_block but not in pg_set_noblock, which is just weird. Make
both of them do it properly, since they have little business making
any assumptions about the socket they're handed. The other places
where we're issuing F_SETFL are working with FDs we just got from
pipe(2), so it's reasonable to assume the FDs' properties are all
default, so I didn't bother adding F_GETFL steps there.
Also, while pg_set_block deserves some points for trying to do things
right, somebody had decided that it'd be even better to cast fcntl's
third argument to "long". Which is completely loony, because POSIX
clearly says the third argument for an F_SETFL call is "int".
Given the lack of field complaints, these missteps apparently are not
of significance on any common platforms. But they're still wrong,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30882.1492800880@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It doesn't make any immediate difference to PostgreSQL, but might as well
follow the standard, since one exists. (I looked at RFC 5803 earlier, but
didn't fully understand it back then.)
The new format uses Base64 instead of hex to encode StoredKey and
ServerKey, which makes the verifiers slightly smaller. Using the same
encoding for the salt and the keys also means that you only need one
encoder/decoder instead of two. Although we have code in the backend to
do both, we are talking about teaching libpq how to create SCRAM verifiers
for PQencodePassword(), and libpq doesn't currently have any code for hex
encoding.
Bump catversion, because this renders any existing SCRAM verifiers in
pg_authid invalid.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/351ba574-85ea-d9b8-9689-8c928dd0955d@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way a failure to synchronize the table list will not leave an
unused slot on the publisher.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Give a more specific error message than "xyz is not a table".
Also document in CREATE PUBLICATION which kinds of relations are not
supported.
based on patch by Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 7c4f524 allowed walsender to execute normal SQL commands
to support table sync feature in logical replication. Previously
while log_statement caused such SQL commands to be logged,
log_replication_commands caused them to be logged, too.
That is, such SQL commands were logged twice unexpectedly
when those settings were both enabled.
This commit forces log_replication_commands to log only replication
commands, to prevent normal SQL commands from being logged twice.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's not safe to raise an error while holding spinlock. But previously
logical replication worker for table sync called the function which
reads the system catalog and may raise an error while it's holding
spinlock. Which could lead to the trouble where spinlock will never
be released and the server gets stuck infinitely.
Author: Petr Jelinek
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi and Fujii Masao
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
is_parallel_safe() supposed that the only relevant property of a SubPlan
was the parallel safety of the referenced subplan tree. This is wrong:
the testexpr or args subtrees might contain parallel-unsafe stuff, as
demonstrated by the test case added here. However, just recursing into the
subtrees fails in a different way: we'll typically find PARAM_EXEC Params
representing the subplan's output columns in the testexpr. The previous
coding supposed that any Param must be treated as parallel-restricted, so
that a naive attempt at fixing this disabled parallel pushdown of SubPlans
altogether. We must instead determine, for any visited Param, whether it
is one that would be computed by a surrounding SubPlan node; if so, it's
safe to push down along with the SubPlan node.
We might later be able to extend this logic to cope with Params used for
correlated subplans and other cases; but that's a task for v11 or beyond.
Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7064.1492022469@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Author: Masahiko Sawada, heavily modified by me
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwEKOw=SmPLxJzkBsH6wwDBgOnVz46QjHbtsiZ-d-2RGUg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since it appears that v10 is going to move the goalposts by some amount
in terms of where you can and can't invoke set-returning functions,
arrange for the executor's "set-valued function called in context that
cannot accept a set" errors to include a syntax position if possible,
pointing to the specific SRF that can't be called where it's located.
The main bit of infrastructure needed for this is to make the query source
text accessible in the executor; but it turns out that commit 4c728f382
already did that. We just need a new function executor_errposition()
modeled on parser_errposition(), and we're ready to rock.
While experimenting with this, I noted that the error position wasn't
properly reported if it occurred in a plpgsql FOR-over-query loop,
which turned out to be because SPI_cursor_open_internal wasn't providing
an error context callback during PortalStart. Fix that.
There's a whole lot more that could be done with this infrastructure
now that it's there, but this is not the right time in the development
cycle for that sort of work. Hence, resist the temptation to plaster
executor_errposition() calls everywhere ... for the moment.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5263.1492471571@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Be sure to reset the launcher's pid (LogicalRepCtx->launcher_pid) to 0
even when the launcher emits an error.
* Declare ApplyLauncherWakeup() as a static function because it's called
only in launcher.c.
* Previously IsBackendPId() was used to check whether the launcher's pid
was valid. IsBackendPid() was necessary because there was the bug where
the launcher's pid was not reset to 0. But now it's fixed, so IsBackendPid()
is not necessary and this patch removes it.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously DatumGetObjectId() was wrongly used for that.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reported offlist by hubert depesz lubaczewski.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per discussion, plain "scram" is confusing because we actually implement
SCRAM-SHA-256 rather than the original SCRAM that uses SHA-1 as the hash
algorithm. If we add support for SCRAM-SHA-512 or some other mechanism in
the SCRAM family in the future, that would become even more confusing.
Most of the internal files and functions still use just "scram" as a
shorthand for SCRMA-SHA-256, but I did change PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM to
PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256, as that could potentially be used by 3rd
party extensions that hook into the password-check hook.
Michael Paquier did this in an earlier version of the SCRAM patch set
already, but I didn't include that in the version that was committed.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fde71ff1-5858-90c8-99a9-1c2427e7bafb@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reported-by: Amit Langote
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Complex crash bug all started with this failure.
Diagnosed and fixed by Nikhil Sontakke, reviewed by me.
Reported-by: Jeff Janes
Author: Nikhil Sontakke
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1xBP8cqdS5eK8APHL=X6RHMMM2vG5g+QamduuTsyCwv9g@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Doing so allows various crash possibilities. Fix by avoiding
having PrescanPreparedTransactions() increment
ShmemVariableCache->nextXid when it has no 2PC files
Bug found by Jeff Janes, diagnosis and patch by Pavan Deolasee,
then patch re-designed for clarity and full accuracy by
Michael Paquier.
Reported-by: Jeff Janes
Author: Pavan Deolasee, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1zMLnH_i1-PVQ-biZzvNx7VcuatriquEnh7HNk6K8Ss3Q@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
Amit Langote
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CopyFrom() needs a range table for formatting certain errors for
constraint violations.
This changes the mechanism of how the range table is passed to the
CopyFrom() executor state. We used to generate the range table and one
entry for the relation manually inside DoCopy(). Now we use
addRangeTableEntryForRelation() to setup the range table and relation
entry for the ParseState, which is then passed down by BeginCopyFrom().
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new catalog reused a column prefix "sta" from pg_statistic, but this
is undesirable, so change the catalog to use prefix "stx" instead.
Also, rename the column that lists enabled statistic kinds as "stxkind"
rather than "enabled".
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f_2t5jhSN7huYRFH3w3rrHfG2QU7hiUHsu-Vdjd1rYT3w@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were accepting creation of extended statistics only for regular
tables, but they can usefully be created for foreign tables, partitioned
tables, and materialized views, too. Allow those cases.
While at it, make sure all the rejected cases throw a consistent error
message, and add regression tests for the whole thing.
Author: David Rowley, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f-BmGo410bh5RSPZUvOO0LhmHL2NYmdrC_Jm8pk_FfyCA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were applying the use_physical_tlist optimization to all relation
scan plans, even those implemented by custom scan providers. However,
that's a bad idea for a couple of reasons. The custom provider might
be unable to provide columns that it hadn't expected to be asked for
(for example, the custom scan might depend on an index-only scan).
Even more to the point, there's no good reason to suppose that this
"optimization" is a win for a custom scan; whatever the custom provider
is doing is likely not based on simply returning physical heap tuples.
(As a counterexample, if the custom scan is an interface to a column store,
demanding all columns would be a huge loss.) If it is a win, the custom
provider could make that decision for itself and insert a suitable
pathtarget into the path, anyway.
Per discussion with Dmitry Ivanov. Back-patch to 9.5 where custom scan
support was introduced. The argument that the custom provider can adjust
the behavior by changing the pathtarget only applies to 9.6+, but on
balance it seems more likely that use_physical_tlist will hurt custom
scans than help them.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e29ddd30-8ef9-4da5-a50b-2bb7b8c7198d@postgrespro.ru
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This addresses the new warning types -Wformat-truncation
-Wformat-overflow that are part of -Wall, via -Wformat, in GCC 7.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Either because of a previous ALTER TABLE .. SET STATISTICS 0 or because
of being invoked with a partial column list, ANALYZE could fail to
acquire sufficient data to build extended statistics. Previously, this
would draw an ERROR and fail to collect any statistics at all (extended
and regular). Change things so that we raise a WARNING instead, and
remove a hint that was wrong in half the cases.
Reported by: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9Kk0NF6Fg7TA=JUXsjpS9kX6NVu27pb5QDCpOYAvb-Og@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Coverity complained because bgw.bgw_extra wasn't being filled in by
ApplyLauncherRegister(). The most future-proof fix is to memset the
whole BackgroundWorker struct to zeroes. While at it, let's apply the
same coding rule to other places that set up BackgroundWorker structs;
four out of five had the same or related issues.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
addRangeTableEntryForENR had a check for pstate != NULL, which Coverity
pointed out was rather useless since it'd already dereferenced pstate
before that. More to the point, we'd established policy in commit
bc93ac12c that we'd require non-NULL pstate for all addRangeTableEntryFor*
functions; this test was evidently copied-and-pasted from some older
version of one of those functions. Make it look more like the others.
In passing, make an elog message look more like the rest of the code,
too.
Michael Paquier
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In standard non-Windows builds, there's no particular reason to care what
address the kernel chooses to map the shared memory segment at. However,
when building with EXEC_BACKEND, there's a risk that the chosen address
won't be available in all child processes. Linux with ASLR enabled (which
it is by default) seems particularly at risk because it puts shmem segments
into the same area where it maps shared libraries. We can work around
that by specifying a mapping address that's outside the range where
shared libraries could get mapped. On x86_64 Linux, 0x7e0000000000
seems to work well.
This is only meant for testing/debugging purposes, so it doesn't seem
necessary to go as far as providing a GUC (or any user-visible
documentation, though we might change that later). Instead, it's just
controlled by setting an environment variable PG_SHMEM_ADDR to the
desired attach address.
Back-patch to all supported branches, since the point here is to
remove intermittent buildfarm failures on EXEC_BACKEND animals.
Owners of affected animals will need to add a suitable setting of
PG_SHMEM_ADDR to their build_env configuration.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7036.1492231361@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not much point in defining test macros for the flag bits if we
don't use 'em.
Amit Kapila
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We'd already recognized that we can't pass function pointers across process
boundaries for functions in loadable modules, since a shared library could
get loaded at different addresses in different processes. But actually the
practice doesn't work for functions in the core backend either, if we're
using EXEC_BACKEND. This is the cause of recent failures on buildfarm
member culicidae. Switch to passing a string function name in all cases.
Something like this needs to be back-patched into 9.6, but let's see
if the buildfarm likes it first.
Petr Jelinek, with a bunch of basically-cosmetic adjustments by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/548f9c1d-eafa-e3fa-9da8-f0cc2f654e60@2ndquadrant.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AFAICT, the only actual benefit of closing a bootstrap transaction
is to reclaim transient memory. We can do that a lot more cheaply
by just doing a MemoryContextReset on a suitable context. This
gets the runtime of the "bootstrap" phase of initdb down to the
point where, at least by eyeball, it's quite negligible compared
to the rest of the phases. Per discussion with Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9244.1492106743@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Standardize on testing a hash index page's type by doing
(opaque->hasho_flag & LH_PAGE_TYPE) == LH_xxx_PAGE
Various places were taking shortcuts like
opaque->hasho_flag & LH_BUCKET_PAGE
which while not actually wrong, is still bad practice because
it encourages use of
opaque->hasho_flag & LH_UNUSED_PAGE
which *is* wrong (LH_UNUSED_PAGE == 0, so the above is constant false).
hash_xlog.c's hash_mask() contained such an incorrect test.
This also ensures that we mask out the additional flag bits that
hasho_flag has accreted since 9.6. pgstattuple's pgstat_hash_page(),
for one, was failing to do that and was thus actively broken.
Also fix assorted comments that hadn't been updated to reflect the
extended usage of hasho_flag, and fix some macros that were testing
just "(hasho_flag & bit)" to use the less dangerous, project-approved
form "((hasho_flag & bit) != 0)".
Coverity found the bug in hash_mask(); I noted the one in
pgstat_hash_page() through code reading.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Stas Kelvich <s.kelvich@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This also changes default behaviour of subscription workers to
synchronous_commit = off.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
The result of TextDatumGetCString is already palloc'ed.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Author: Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
regexport.c thought it could just ignore LACON arcs, but the correct
behavior is to treat them as satisfiable while consuming zero input
(rather reminiscently of commit 9f1e642d5). Otherwise, the emitted
simplified-NFA representation may contain no paths leading from initial
to final state, which unsurprisingly confuses pg_trgm, as seen in
bug #14623 from Jeff Janes.
Since regexport's output representation has no concept of an arc that
consumes zero input, recurse internally to find the next normal arc(s)
after any LACON transitions. We'd be forced into changing that
representation if a LACON could be the last arc reaching the final
state, but fortunately the regex library never builds NFAs with such
a configuration, so there always is a next normal arc.
Back-patch to 9.3 where this logic was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170413180503.25948.94871@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This contains some protocol changes to SASL authentiation (which is new
in v10):
* For future-proofing, in the AuthenticationSASL message that begins SASL
authentication, provide a list of SASL mechanisms that the server
supports, for the client to choose from. Currently, it's always just
SCRAM-SHA-256.
* Add a separate authentication message type for the final server->client
SASL message, which the client doesn't need to respond to. This makes
it unambiguous whether the client is supposed to send a response or not.
The SASL mechanism should know that anyway, but better to be explicit.
Also, in the server, support clients that don't send an Initial Client
response in the first SASLInitialResponse message. The server is supposed
to first send an empty request in that case, to which the client will
respond with the data that usually comes in the Initial Client Response.
libpq uses the Initial Client Response field and doesn't need this, and I
would assume any other sensible implementation to use Initial Client
Response, too, but let's follow the SASL spec.
Improve the documentation on SASL authentication in protocol. Add a
section describing the SASL message flow, and some details on our
SCRAM-SHA-256 implementation.
Document the different kinds of PasswordMessages that the frontend sends
in different phases of SASL authentication, as well as GSS/SSPI
authentication as separate message formats. Even though they're all 'p'
messages, and the exact format depends on the context, describing them as
separate message formats makes the documentation more clear.
Reviewed by Michael Paquier and Álvaro Hernández Tortosa.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqS-aFg0iM3AQOJwKDv_0WkAedRjs1W2X8EixSz+sKBXCQ@mail.gmail.com
|
