| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The node types A_Const, Constraint, and A_Expr had custom output
functions, but no read functions were implemented so far.
The A_Expr output format had to be tweaked a bit to make it easier to
parse.
Be a bit more cautious about applying strncmp to unterminated strings.
Also error out if an unrecognized enum value is found in each case,
instead of just printing a placeholder value. That was maybe ok for
debugging but won't work if we want to have robust round-tripping.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/4159834.1657405226@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The node tokenizer went out of its way to store BitString node values
without the leading 'b'. But everything else in the system stores the
leading 'b'. This would break if a BitString node is
read-printed-read.
Also, the node tokenizer didn't know that BitString node tokens could
also start with 'x'.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/4159834.1657405226@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The main parser checks whether a literal fits into an int when
deciding whether it should be put into an Integer or Float node. The
parser processes integer literals without signs. So a most-negative
integer literal will not fit into Integer and will end up as a Float
node.
The node tokenizer did this differently. It included the sign when
checking whether the literal fit into int. So a most-negative integer
would indeed fit that way and end up as an Integer node.
In order to preserve the node structure correctly, we need the node
tokenizer to also analyze integer literals without sign.
There are a number of test cases in the regression tests that have a
most-negative integer argument of some utility statement, so this
issue is easily reproduced under WRITE_READ_PARSE_PLAN_TREES.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/4159834.1657405226@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The use in regexec.c could remain, since we only try to keep headers C++
clean. But there really doesn't seem to be a good reason to use register in
that spot.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220308185902.ibdqmasoaunzjrfc@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Because index creation does not go through heap_create_with_catalog() we
didn't call pgstat_create_relation(), leading to index stats of a newly
created realtion not getting dropped during rollback. To fix, move the
pgstat_create_relation() to heap_create(), which indexes do use.
Similarly, because dropping an index does not go through
heap_drop_with_catalog(), we didn't drop index stats when the transaction
dropping an index committed. Here there's no convenient common path for
indexes and relations, so index_drop() now calls pgstat_drop_relation().
Add tests for transactional index stats handling.
Author: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/51bbf286-2b4a-8998-bd12-eaae4b765d99@amazon.com
Backpatch: 15-, like 8b1dccd37c71, which introduced the bug
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We previously thought that allowing such cases can confuse users when they
specify DROP TABLES IN SCHEMA but that doesn't seem to be the case based
on discussion. This helps to uplift the restriction during
ALTER TABLE ... SET SCHEMA which used to ensure that we couldn't end up
with a publication having both a schema and the same schema's table.
To allow this, we need to forbid having any schema on a publication if
column lists on a table are specified (and vice versa). This is because
otherwise we still need a restriction during ALTER TABLE ... SET SCHEMA to
forbid cases where it could lead to a publication having both a schema and
the same schema's table with column list.
Based on suggestions by Peter Eisentraut.
Author: Hou Zhijie and Vignesh C
Reviewed-By: Peter Smith, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 15, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2729c9e2-9aac-8cda-f2f4-34f2bcc18f4e@enterprisedb.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions for several "lexer
adjacent" backend functions. These were missed by commit aab06442.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similar to 5f12bc94dc, the code must re-check PageIsAllVisible() after
buffer lock is re-acquired. Backpatching to the same version, 12.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEP4nAw9jYQDKd_5Y+-s2E4YiUJq1vqiikFjYGpLShtp-K3gag@mail.gmail.com
Reported-by: Robins Tharakan
Reviewed-by: Robins Tharakan
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This may be a bit too subtle, but removing that word from there makes
this clause no longer a perfect parallel of the GRANT variant "ALL
TABLES IN SCHEMA": indeed, for publications what we record is the schema
itself, not the tables therein, which means that any tables added to the
schema in the future are also published. This is completely different
to what GRANT does, which is affect only the tables that exist when the
command is executed.
There isn't resounding support for this change, but there are a few
positive votes and no opposition. Because the time to 15 RC1 is very
short, let's get this out now.
Backpatch to 15.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2729c9e2-9aac-8cda-f2f4-34f2bcc18f4e
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This comment has been wrong since its introduction in commit 0d5f05cde;
backpatch to v12 where that came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK14VGf-xQjGQN4o1QyAbXAaxugU5%3DqfcmTDh1iufUDnV_w%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Autoconf is showing its age, fewer and fewer contributors know how to wrangle
it. Recursive make has a lot of hard to resolve dependency issues and slow
incremental rebuilds. Our home-grown MSVC build system is hard to maintain for
developers not using Windows and runs tests serially. While these and other
issues could individually be addressed with incremental improvements, together
they seem best addressed by moving to a more modern build system.
After evaluating different build system choices, we chose to use meson, to a
good degree based on the adoption by other open source projects.
We decided that it's more realistic to commit a relatively early version of
the new build system and mature it in tree.
This commit adds an initial version of a meson based build system. It supports
building postgres on at least AIX, FreeBSD, Linux, macOS, NetBSD, OpenBSD,
Solaris and Windows (however only gcc is supported on aix, solaris). For
Windows/MSVC postgres can now be built with ninja (faster, particularly for
incremental builds) and msbuild (supporting the visual studio GUI, but
building slower).
Several aspects (e.g. Windows rc file generation, PGXS compatibility, LLVM
bitcode generation, documentation adjustments) are done in subsequent commits
requiring further review. Other aspects (e.g. not installing test-only
extensions) are not yet addressed.
When building on Windows with msbuild, builds are slower when using a visual
studio version older than 2019, because those versions do not support
MultiToolTask, required by meson for intra-target parallelism.
The plan is to remove the MSVC specific build system in src/tools/msvc soon
after reaching feature parity. However, we're not planning to remove the
autoconf/make build system in the near future. Likely we're going to keep at
least the parts required for PGXS to keep working around until all supported
versions build with meson.
Some initial help for postgres developers is at
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Meson
With contributions from Thomas Munro, John Naylor, Stone Tickle and others.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-By: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211012083721.hvixq4pnh2pixr3j@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the ps display is not cleared at this point, the process could
continue displaying "recovering NNN" even if handling end-of-recovery
steps. df9274a has tackled that by providing some information with the
end-of-recovery checkpoint but 7ff23c6 has nullified the effect of the
first commit.
Per a suggestion from Justin, just clear the ps display when we are done
with recovery, so as no incorrect information is displayed. This may
get extended in the future, but for now restore the pre-7ff23c6
behavior.
Author: Justin Prysby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220913223954.GU31833@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit updates two code paths to use pg_lfind32() introduced by
b6ef167 with TransactionId arrays:
- At the end of TransactionIdIsInProgress(), when checking for the case
of still running but overflowed subxids.
- XidIsConcurrent(), when checking for a serializable conflict.
These cases are less impactful than 37a6e5d, but a bit of
micro-benchmarking of this API shows that linear search speeds up by
~20% depending on the number of items involved (x86_64 and amd64 looked
at here).
Author: Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220901185153.GA783106@nathanxps13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We check that the ICU locale is only specified if the ICU locale
provider is selected. But we did that too early. We need to wait
until we load the settings of the template database, since that could
also set what the locale provider is.
Reported-by: Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9ba4cd1ea6ed6b7b15c0ff15e6f540cd@postgrespro.ru
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For publication schemas (OBJECT_PUBLICATION_NAMESPACE) and user
mappings (OBJECT_USER_MAPPING), pg_get_object_address() checked the
array length of the second argument, but not of the first argument.
If the first argument was too long, it would just silently ignore
everything but the first argument. Fix that by checking the length of
the first argument as well.
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/caaef70b-a874-1088-92ef-5ac38269c33b%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is not our usual style to use "we" in messages. Also, remove some
noise words. Backpatch to 15.
Noted by Kyotaro Horiguchi.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220914.111507.13049297635620898.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously the following snprintf() wrappers:
* ReplicationSlotNameForTablesync()
* ReplicationOriginNameForTablesync()
... used int as a second argument of snprintf() while the actual type of it
is size_t. Although it doesn't fail at present better replace it with Size
for consistency with the rest of the system.
Author: Aleksander Alekseev
Reviewed-By: Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut%2BPsa8hhfSE6ozUK-ih7GkQziAVAf4f3bqiXEj2nQiu-43g%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is not our usual style to use "we" in the error messages.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-By: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220914.111507.13049297635620898.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
expression_tree_walker and allied functions have traditionally
declared their callback functions as, say, "bool (*walker) ()"
to allow for variation in the declared types of the callback
functions' context argument. This is apparently going to be
forbidden by the next version of the C standard, and the latest
version of clang warns about that. In any case it's always
been pretty poor for error-detection purposes, so fixing it is
a good thing to do.
What we want to do is change the callback argument declarations to
be like "bool (*walker) (Node *node, void *context)", which is
correct so far as expression_tree_walker and friends are concerned,
but not change the actual callback functions. Strict compliance with
the C standard would require changing them to declare their arguments
as "void *context" and then cast to the appropriate context struct
type internally. That'd be very invasive and it would also introduce
a bunch of opportunities for future bugs, since we'd no longer have
any check that the correct sort of context object is passed by outside
callers or internal recursion cases. Therefore, we're just going
to ignore the standard's position that "void *" isn't necessarily
compatible with struct pointers. No machine built in the last forty
or so years actually behaves that way, so it's not worth introducing
bug hazards for compatibility with long-dead hardware.
Therefore, to silence these compiler warnings, introduce a layer of
macro wrappers that cast the supplied function name to the official
argument type. Thanks to our use of -Wcast-function-type, this will
still produce a warning if the supplied function is seriously
incompatible with the required signature, without going as far as
the official spec restriction does.
This method fixes the problem without any need for source code changes
outside nodeFuncs.h/.c. However, it is an ABI break because the
physically called functions now have names ending in "_impl". Hence
we can only fix it this way in HEAD. In the back branches, we'll have
to settle for disabling -Wdeprecated-non-prototype.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGKpHPDTv67Y+s6yiC8KH5OXeDg6a-twWo_xznKTcG0kSA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix selfuncs.h cpluspluscheck complaint, without reintroducing a
parameter name inconsistency (restore the original declaration names,
and then make corresponding function definitions consistent with that).
Oversight in commit a601366a.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in optimizer, parser,
utility, libpq, and "commands" code, as well as in remaining library
code. Do the same for all code related to frontend programs (with the
exception of pg_dump/pg_dumpall related code).
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will handle
ecpg and pg_dump/pg_dumpall.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
clang 15+ will issue a set-but-not-used warning when the only
use of a variable is in autoincrements (e.g., "foo++;").
That's perfectly sensible, but it detects a few more cases that
we'd not noticed before. Silence the warnings with our usual
methods, such as PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY, or in one case by
actually removing a useless variable.
One thing that we can't nicely get rid of is that with %pure-parser,
Bison emits "yynerrs" as a local variable that falls foul of this
warning. To silence those, I inserted "(void) yynerrs;" in the
top-level productions of affected grammars.
Per recently-established project policy, this is a candidate
for back-patching into out-of-support branches: it suppresses
annoying compiler warnings but changes no behavior. Hence,
back-patch to 9.5, which is as far as these patches go without
issues. (A preliminary check shows that the prior branches
need some other set-but-not-used cleanups too, so I'll leave
them for another day.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/514615.1663615243@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These variables used XLogRecPtr instead of RepOriginId.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBm-vNyBSXGp4bmJGvhr=S-EGc5q1dtV70cFTcJvLhC=Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in storage, catalog,
access method, executor, and logical replication code, as well as in
miscellaneous utility/library code.
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will do the
same for other parts of the codebase.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions. Having parameter names
that are reliably consistent in this way will make it easier to reason
about groups of related C functions from the same translation unit as a
module. It will also make certain refactoring tasks easier.
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will do the
same for other parts of the codebase.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adjust a handful of remaining function prototypes that were overlooked
by recent commit bc2187ed. This oversight wasn't caught by clang-tidy
because the functions in question are only built in custom REG_DEBUG
builds.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make regex code consistently use named parameters in function
declarations. Also make sure that parameter names from each function's
declaration match corresponding definition parameter names.
This makes Henry Spencer's regex code follow Postgres coding standards.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The header comment for get_cheapest_group_keys_order() claimed that the
output arguments were set to a newly allocated list which may be freed by
the calling function, however, this was not always true as the function
would simply leave these arguments untouched in some cases.
This tripped me up when working on 1349d2790 as I mistakenly assumed I
could perform a list_concat with the output parameters. That turned out
bad due to list_concat modifying the original input lists.
In passing, make it more clear that the number of distinct values is
important to reduce tiebreaks during sorts. Also, explain what the
n_preordered parameter means.
Backpatch-through: 15, where get_cheapest_group_keys_order was introduced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The comment claimed we don't consider other orders of the GROUP BY clause,
but this is no longer true as of db0d67db2.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvq65=9Ro+hLX1i9ugWEiNDvHrBibAO7ARcTnf38_JE+UQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15, where db0d67db2 was introduced.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220919111000.GW31833@telsasoft.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If role A is a direct or indirect member of role B but does not inherit
B's privileges (because at least one relevant grant was created WITH
INHERIT FALSE) then A should not be permitted to bypass privilege
checks that require the privileges of B. For example, A can't change
the privileges of objects owned by B, nor can A drop those objects.
However, up until now, it's been possible for A to change default
privileges for role B. That doesn't seem to be correct, because a
non-inherited role grant is only supposed to permit you to assume
the identity of the granted role via SET ROLE, and should not
otherwise permit you to exercise the privileges of that role. Most
places followed that rule, but this case was an exception.
This could be construed as a security vulnerability, but it does not
seem entirely clear cut, since older branches were fuzzy about the
distinction between is_member_of_role() and has_privs_of_role() in
a number of other ways as well. Because of this, and because
user-visible behavior changes in minor releases are to be avoided
whenever possible, no back-patch.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobG_YUP06R_PM_2Z7wR0qv_52gQPHD8CYXbJva0cf0E+A@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The API contract for planstate_tree_walker() callbacks is that they
take a PlanState pointer and a context pointer. Somebody figured
they could save a couple lines of code by ignoring that, and passing
ExecShutdownNode itself as the walker even though it has but one
argument. Somewhat remarkably, we've gotten away with that so far.
However, it seems clear that the upcoming C2x standard means to
forbid such cases, and compilers that actively break such code
likely won't be far behind. So spend the extra few lines of code
to do it honestly with a separate walker function.
In HEAD, we might as well go further and remove ExecShutdownNode's
useless return value. I left that as-is in back branches though,
to forestall complaints about ABI breakage.
Back-patch, with the thought that this might become of practical
importance before our stable branches are all out of service.
It doesn't seem to be fixing any live bug on any currently known
platform, however.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/208054.1663534665@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Hou Zhijie and Zhang Mingli
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB57162559C01FE2848C12E8F7944D9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Japin Li
Reviewed by Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/MEYP282MB1669459813B36FB5EAA38434B6499@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since c7aba7c, the transform method used during parse analysis of a
subcripting construct has moved from transformAssignmentSubscripts() to
the per-type transform method (arrays or arbitrary types) the step that
checks for slicing support, but transformAssignmentSubscripts() has kept
traces of it. Removing it simplifies the code, so let's clean up all
that.
Author: Zhang Mingli
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0d7041ac-c704-48ad-86fd-e05feddf08ed@Spark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make reorderbuffer.h function declarations consistently use named
parameters. Also make sure that the declarations use names that match
corresponding names from function definitions in reorderbuffer.c. This
makes the definitions easier to follow, especially in the case of
functions that happen to have adjoining arguments of the same type.
This patch was written with help from clang-tidy. Specifically, its
"readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name" check and its
"readability-named-parameter" check were used.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3955318.1663377656@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So far they were created below CacheMemoryContext. However, that's not
guaranteed to exist in all situations, leading to memory contexts created as
top-level contexts. There isn't actually a good reason anymore to create them
below CacheMemoryContext, so just creating them below TopMemoryContext seems
the best approach.
Reported-by: Reid Thompson <reid.thompson@crunchydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b948b729-42fe-f88c-2f4a-0e65d84c049b@amazon.com
Backpatch: 15-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since Windows 10 1703, it is additionally necessary to pass a flag
called FILE_MAP_LARGE_PAGES to MapViewOfFile() to enable large pages at
map time. This flag is ignored on older versions of Windows, where
large pages should still be able to work properly without setting it.
Note that the flag would be set only for binaries that knew about it at
compile-time, which should be more or less all the Windows environments
these days.
Since 495ed0e, Windows 10 is the minimum version of Windows supported by
Postgres, making this change easy to reason about on HEAD. Per
discussion, no backpatch is done for the moment.
Reported-by: Okano Naoki
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier, Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17448-0a96583a67edb1f7@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of listing all valid options, we now try to provide one
that looks similar. Since this may be useful elsewhere, this
change introduces a new set of functions that can be reused for
similar purposes.
Author: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/b1f9f399-3a1a-b554-283f-4ae7f34608e2@enterprisedb.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Check in CREATE DATABASE and initdb that the selected encoding is
supported by ICU. Before, they would pass but users would later get
an error from the server when they tried to use the database.
Also document that initdb sets the encoding to UTF8 by default if the
ICU locale provider is chosen.
Author: Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6dd6db0984d86a51b7255ba79f111971@postgrespro.ru
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After commit cc2c7d65fc27e877c9f407587b0b92d46cd6dd16 added this flag,
failure to reset it caused assertion failures. In non-assert builds, it
made the system fail to achieve the objectives listed in that commit;
chiefly, we might emit a spurious log message. Back-patch to v15, where
that commit first appeared.
Bharath Rupireddy and Kyotaro Horiguchi. Reviewed by Dilip Kumar,
Nathan Bossart and Michael Paquier. Reported by Dilip Kumar.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-sE3ry=ycMPVtC+Djw4Fd7gbUGVv_qqw6qfzp=JLvqT3g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While at it, make ellipses formatting consistent when describing SQL statements.
Ekaterina Kiryanova and Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed by myself and Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/eed5cec0-a542-53da-6a5e-7789c6ed9817%40postgrespro.ru
Backpatch only the grammar fix to v15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit ecaf7c5df5 removed gram.h from the backend's generated-headers
target. In LLVM builds, this leads to loss of dependency information
when generating .bc files. To fix, add a rule that mirrors ad-hoc .o
dependencies for .bc files as well.
Per cfbot (no buildfarm failures reported)
Analysis by Tom Lane and Andres Freund
Proposed fix by Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220914210427.y26tkagmxo5wwbvp%40awork3.anarazel.de
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Referring to the WAL as just "log" invites confusion with the
postmaster log, so avoid doing that in docs and error messages.
Also shorten "WAL segment file" to just "WAL file" in various
places.
Bharath Rupireddy, reviewed by Nathan Bossart and Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACUeXa8tDPaiTLexBDMZ7hgvaN+RTb957-cn5qwv9zf-MQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In 29f45e299, we added support for optimizing the execution of NOT
IN(values) by using a hash table instead of a linear search over the
array. That commit neglected to update the header comment for
convert_saop_to_hashed_saop() to mention this fact. Here we fix that.
Author: James Coleman
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe99NUpAPcxgchGstgM23fmiGjqQPot8627YgkBgNt=BfA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15, where 29f45e299 was added.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Various bits of code were declaring signal handlers manually,
using "int signum" or variants of that. We evidently have no
platforms where that's actually wrong, but let's use our
SIGNAL_ARGS macro everywhere anyway. If nothing else, it's
good for finding signal handlers easily.
No need for back-patch, since this is just cosmetic AFAICS.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2684964.1663167995@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This appears to be a merge mistake in 96ef3237bf74. We could put it
back the way it was before JSON_TABLE and it'd be two lines shorter, but
it's likely that JSON_TABLE will be back and will prefer things this
way. It makes no other difference in practice.
Backpatch to 15.
Reported by Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAr4nOcNQskC4oBEZN4S+4heJ=1ch_ZKOxU+_Ef-FQSf-g@mail.gmail.com
|