| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Up to now, we remembered the definition of a capturing parenthesis
subexpression by storing a pointer to the associated subRE node.
That was okay before, because that subRE didn't get modified anymore
while parsing the rest of the regexp. However, in the wake of
commit ea1268f63, that's no longer true: the outer invocation of
parseqatom() feels free to scribble on that subRE. This seems to
work anyway, because the states we jam into the child atom in the
"prepare a general-purpose state skeleton" stanza aren't really
semantically different from the original endpoints of the child atom.
But that would be mighty easy to break, and it's definitely not how
things worked before.
Between this and the issue fixed in the prior commit, it seems best
to get rid of this dependence on subRE nodes entirely. We don't need
the whole child subRE for future backrefs, only its starting and ending
NFA states; so let's just store pointers to those.
Also, in the corner case where we make an extra subRE to handle
immediately-nested capturing parentheses, it seems like it'd be smart
to have the extra subRE have the same begin/end states as the original
child subRE does (s/s2 not lp/rp). I think that linking it from lp to
rp might actually be semantically wrong, though since Spencer's original
code did it that way, I'm not totally certain. Using s/s2 is certainly
not wrong, in any case.
Per report from Mark Dilger. Back-patch to v14 where the problematic
patches came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0203588E-E609-43AF-9F4F-902854231EE7@enterprisedb.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit cebc1d34e taught parseqatom() to optimize cases where a branch
contains only one, "messy", atom by getting rid of excess subRE nodes.
The way we really should do that is to keep the subRE built for the
"messy" child atom; but to avoid changing parseqatom's nominal API,
I made it delete that node after copying its fields to the outer subRE
made by parsebranch(). It seems that that actually worked at the time;
but it became dangerous after ea1268f63, because that later commit
allowed the lower invocation of parse() to return a subRE that was also
pointed to by some v->subs[] entry. This meant we could wind up with a
dangling pointer in v->subs[], allowing a later backref to misbehave,
but only if that subRE struct had been reused in between. So the damage
seems confined to cases like '((...))...(...\2'.
To fix, do what I should have done before and modify parseqatom's API
to make it possible for it to remove the caller's subRE instead of the
callee's. That's safer because we know that subRE isn't complete yet,
so noplace else will have a pointer to it.
Per report from Mark Dilger. Back-patch to v14 where the problematic
patches came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0203588E-E609-43AF-9F4F-902854231EE7@enterprisedb.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As reported by a few OSX buildfarm animals there exist at least one path where
temporary files exist during AtProcExit_Files() processing. As temporary file
cleanup causes pgstat reporting, the assertions added in ee3f8d3d3ae caused
failures.
This is not an OSX specific issue, we were just lucky that timing on OSX
reliably triggered the problem. The known way to cause this is a FATAL error
during perform_base_backup() with a MANIFEST used - adding an elog(FATAL)
after InitializeBackupManifest() reliably reproduces the problem in isolation.
The problem is that the temporary file created in InitializeBackupManifest()
is not cleaned up via resource owner cleanup as WalSndResourceCleanup()
currently is only used for non-FATAL errors. That then allows to reach
AtProcExit_Files() with existing temporary files, causing the assertion
failure.
To fix this problem, move temporary file cleanup to a before_shmem_exit() hook
and add assertions ensuring that no temporary files are created before / after
temporary file management has been initialized / shut down. The cleanest way
to do so seems to be to split fd.c initialization into two, one for plain file
access and one for temporary file access.
Right now there's no need to perform further fd.c cleanup during process exit,
so I just renamed AtProcExit_Files() to BeforeShmemExit_Files(). Alternatively
we could perform another pass through the files to check that no temporary
files exist, but the added assertions seem to provide enough protection
against that.
It might turn out that the assertions added in ee3f8d3d3ae will cause too much
noise - in that case we'll have to downgrade them to a WARNING, at least
temporarily.
This commit is not necessarily the best approach to address this issue, but it
should resolve the buildfarm failures. We can revise later.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210807190131.2bm24acbebl4wl6i@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather than trying to pick table aliases that won't conflict with
any possible user-defined matview column name, adjust the queries'
syntax so that the aliases are only used in places where they can't be
mistaken for column names. Mostly this consists of writing "alias.*"
not just "alias", which adds clarity for humans as well as machines.
We do have the issue that "SELECT alias.*" acts differently from
"SELECT alias", but we can use the same hack ruleutils.c uses for
whole-row variables in SELECT lists: write "alias.*::compositetype".
We might as well revert to the original aliases after doing this;
they're a bit easier to read.
Like 75d66d10e, back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2488325.1628261320@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously on_shmem_exit() was used. The upcoming shared memory stats patch
uses DSM segments to store stats, which can not be used after the
dsm_backend_shutdown() call in shmem_exit().
The preceding commits were required to permit this change. This commit is
split off the shared memory stats patch to make it easier to isolate problems
caused by the ordering changes rather than the much larger changes in where
stats are stored.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210405092914.mmxqe7j56lsjfsej@alap3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210803023612.iziacxk5syn2r4ut@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously on_shmem_exit() was used. The upcoming shared memory stats patch
uses DSM segments to store stats, which can not be used after the
dsm_backend_shutdown() call in shmem_exit(). There does not seem to be any
reason to do ShutdownXLOG() via on_shmem_exit(), so change it.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210405092914.mmxqe7j56lsjfsej@alap3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210803023612.iziacxk5syn2r4ut@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a step toward storing stats in dynamic shared memory. As dynamic
shared memory segments are detached from just after before_shmem_exit()
callbacks are processed, but before on_shmem_exit() callbacks are, no stats
can be collected after before_shmem_exit() callbacks have been processed.
Parallel worker shutdown can cause stats to be emitted during DSM detach
callbacks, e.g. for SharedFileSet (which closes its files, which can causes
fd.c to emit stats about temporary files). Therefore parallel worker shutdown
needs to complete during the processing of before_shmem_exit callbacks.
One might think this problem could instead be solved by carefully ordering the
attaching to DSM segments, so that the pgstats segments get detached from
later than the parallel query ones. That turns out to not work because the
stats hash might need to grow which can cause new segments to be
allocated, which then will be detached from earlier.
There are two code changes:
First, call ParallelWorkerShutdown() via before_shmem_exit. That's a good idea
on its own, because other shutdown callbacks like ShutdownPostgres and
ShutdownAuxiliaryProcess are called via before_*.
Second, explicitly detach from the parallel query DSM segment, thereby
ensuring all stats are emitted during ParallelWorkerShutdown().
There are nicer solutions to these problems, but it's not obvious which of
those solutions is the correct one. As the shared memory stats work already is
a huge amount of work...
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210405092914.mmxqe7j56lsjfsej@alap3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210803023612.iziacxk5syn2r4ut@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously pgstat_initialize() was called in InitPostgres() and
AuxiliaryProcessMain(). As it turns out there was at least one case where we
reported stats before pgstat_initialize() was called, see
AutoVacWorkerMain()'s intentionally early call to pgstat_report_autovac().
This turns out to not be a problem with the current pgstat implementation as
pgstat_initialize() only registers a shutdown callback. But in the shared
memory based stats implementation we are working towards pgstat_initialize()
has to do more work.
After b406478b87e BaseInit() is a central place where initialization shared by
normal backends and auxiliary backends can be put. Obviously BaseInit() is
called before InitPostgres() registers ShutdownPostgres. Previously
ShutdownPostgres was the first before_shmem_exit callback, now that's commonly
pgstats. That should be fine.
Previously pgstat_initialize() was not called in bootstrap mode, but there
does not appear to be a need for that. It's now done unconditionally.
To detect future issues like this, assertions are added to a few places
verifying that the pgstat subsystem is initialized and not yet shut down.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210405092914.mmxqe7j56lsjfsej@alap3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Casting a value that's already of a type with a specific typmod
to an unspecified typmod doesn't do anything so far as run-time
behavior is concerned. However, it really ought to change the
exposed type of the expression to match. Up to now,
coerce_type_typmod hasn't bothered with that, which creates gotchas
in contexts such as recursive unions. If for example one side of
the union is numeric(18,3), but it needs to be plain numeric to
match the other side, there's no direct way to express that.
This is easy enough to fix, by inserting a RelabelType to update the
exposed type of the expression. However, it's a bit nervous-making
to change this behavior, because it's stood for a really long time.
(I strongly suspect that it's like this in part because the logic
pre-dates the introduction of RelabelType in 7.0. The commit log
message for 57b30e8e2 is interesting reading here.) As a compromise,
we'll sneak the change into 14beta3, and consider back-patching to
stable branches if no complaints emerge in the next three months.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABNQVagu3bZGqiTjb31a8D5Od3fUMs7Oh3gmZMQZVHZ=uWWWfQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Formerly, the numeric code tested whether an integer value of a larger
type would fit in a smaller type by casting it to the smaller type and
then testing if the reverse conversion produced the original value.
That's perfectly fine, except that it caused a test failure on
buildfarm animal castoroides, most likely due to a compiler bug.
Instead, do these tests by comparing against PG_INT16/32_MIN/MAX. That
matches existing code in other places, such as int84(), which is more
widely tested, and so is less likely to go wrong.
While at it, add regression tests covering the numeric-to-int8/4/2
conversions, and adjust the recently added tests to the style of
434ddfb79a (on the v11 branch) to make failures easier to diagnose.
Per buildfarm via Tom Lane, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2394813.1628179479%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For EXEC_BACKEND InitProcess()/InitAuxiliaryProcess() needs to have been
called well before we call BaseInit(), as SubPostmasterMain() needs LWLocks to
work. Having the order of initialization differ between platforms makes it
unnecessarily hard to understand the system and to add initialization points
for new subsystems without a lot of duplication.
To be able to change the order, BaseInit() cannot trigger
CreateSharedMemoryAndSemaphores() anymore - obviously that needs to have
happened before we can call InitProcess(). It seems cleaner to create shared
memory explicitly in single user/bootstrap mode anyway.
After this change the separation of bufmgr initialization into
InitBufferPoolAccess() / InitBufferPoolBackend() is not meaningful anymore so
the latter is removed.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was an oversight in 07bf3785099. While it does reduce the benefit of the
simplification due to that commit, it still seems like a win to me.
It seems like it might be a good idea to have a function mirroring
InitPostmasterChild() / InitStandaloneProcess() for postmaster in miscinit.c
to make it easier to keep initialization between the three possible
environment in sync.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210805214109.lzfk3r3ae37bahmv@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For one, the existing location lead to somewhat awkward code in main(). For
another, the new location is easier to understand anyway.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Neither is actually initialized as an auxiliary process, so it does not really
make sense to reserve a PGPROC etc for them.
This keeps checker mode implemented by exiting partway through bootstrap
mode. That might be worth changing at some point, perhaps if we ever extend
checker mode to be a more general tool.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After the preceding commits the auxprocess code is independent from
bootstrap.c - so a dedicated file seems less confusing.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Kept separate for ease of review, particularly because pgindent insists on
reflowing a few comments.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There practically was no shared code between the two, once all the ifs are
removed. And it was quite confusing that aux processes weren't actually
started by the call to AuxiliaryProcessMain() in main().
There's more to do, AuxiliaryProcessMain() should move out of bootstrap.c, and
BootstrapModeMain() shouldn't use/be part of AuxProcType.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is confusing that aux processes are started with --forkboot, given that
bootstrap mode cannot run below postmaster.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 464824323e added the argument "txn" into maybe_send_schema()
though it was not used.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716146E43928FB92D45D29794EC9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a long-standing bug when using to_char() to format a
numeric value in scientific notation -- if the value's exponent is
less than -NUMERIC_MAX_DISPLAY_SCALE-1 (-1001), it produced a
division-by-zero error.
The reason for this error was that get_str_from_var_sci() divides its
input by 10^exp, which it produced using power_var_int(). However, the
underflow test in power_var_int() causes it to return zero if the
result scale is too small. That's not a problem for power_var_int()'s
only other caller, power_var(), since that limits the rscale to 1000,
but in get_str_from_var_sci() the exponent can be much smaller,
requiring a much larger rscale. Fix by introducing a new function to
compute 10^exp directly, with no rscale limit. This also allows 10^exp
to be computed more efficiently, without any numeric multiplication,
division or rounding.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWhojfH4whaqgUKBe8D5jNHB8ytzemL-PnRx+KCTyMXmg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These have been unrelated since bgwriter and checkpointer were split into two
processes in 806a2aee379. As there several pending patches (shared memory
stats, extending the set of tracked IO / buffer statistics) that are made a
bit more awkward by the grouping, split them. Done separately to make
reviewing easier.
This does *not* change the contents of pg_stat_bgwriter or move fields out of
bgwriter/checkpointer stats that arguably do not belong in either. However
pgstat_fetch_global() was renamed and split into
pgstat_fetch_stat_checkpointer() and pgstat_fetch_stat_bgwriter().
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210405092914.mmxqe7j56lsjfsej@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Oversight in commit 3499df0d, which generalized the reloption as a way
of giving users a way to consistently avoid VACUUM's index bypass
optimization.
Per off-list report from Nikolay Shaplov.
Backpatch: 14-, where index cleanup reloption was extended.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit a8fd13cab0 added support for prepared transactions to built-in
logical replication via a new option "two_phase" for a subscription. The
"two_phase" option was not allowed with the existing streaming option.
This commit permits the combination of "streaming" and "two_phase"
subscription options. It extends the pgoutput plugin and the subscriber
side code to add the prepare API for streaming transactions which will
apply the changes accumulated in the spool-file at prepare time.
Author: Peter Smith and Ajin Cherian
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C, Amit Kapila, Greg Nancarrow
Tested-By: Haiying Tang
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/02DA5F5E-CECE-4D9C-8B4B-418077E2C010@postgrespro.ru
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMGcDxeqEpWj3fTXwqhSwBdXd2RS9jzwWscO-XbeCfso6ts3+Q@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds new functions regexp_count(), regexp_instr(),
regexp_like(), and regexp_substr(), and extends regexp_replace()
with some new optional arguments. All these functions follow
the definitions used in Oracle, although there are small differences
in the regexp language due to using our own regexp engine -- most
notably, that the default newline-matching behavior is different.
Similar functions appear in DB2 and elsewhere, too. Aside from
easing portability, these functions are easier to use for certain
tasks than our existing regexp_match[es] functions.
Gilles Darold, heavily revised by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fc160ee0-c843-b024-29bb-97b5da61971f@darold.net
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously spilled units greater than months were truncated to months.
Also document the spill behavior.
Reported-by: Bryn Llewelly
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/BDAE4B56-3337-45A2-AC8A-30593849D6C0@yugabyte.com
Backpatch-through: master
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 7ff23c6d277d1d90478a51f0dd81414d343f3850 left us with two
identical cases. Collapse them.
Author: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJ8NRsqgkZEnsnRc2MFROBV-jCnacbYvtpptK2A9YYp9Q%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
959d00e9d added the ability to make use of an Append node instead of a
MergeAppend when we wanted to perform a scan of a partitioned table and
the required sort order was the same as the partitioned keys and the
partitioned table was defined in such a way that earlier partitions were
guaranteed to only contain lower-order values than later partitions.
However, previously we didn't allow these ordered partition scans for
LIST partitioned table when there were any partitions that allowed
multiple Datums. This was a very cheap check to make and we could likely
have done a little better by checking if there were interleaved
partitions, but at the time we didn't have visibility about which
partitions were pruned, so we still may have disallowed cases where all
interleaved partitions were pruned.
Since 475dbd0b7, we now have knowledge of pruned partitions, we can do a
much better job inside partitions_are_ordered().
Here we pass which partitions survived partition pruning into
partitions_are_ordered() and, for LIST partitioning, have it check to see
if any live partitions exist that are also in the new "interleaved_parts"
field defined in PartitionBoundInfo.
For RANGE partitioning we can relax the code which caused the partitions
to be unordered if a DEFAULT partition existed. Since we now know which
partitions were pruned, partitions_are_ordered() now returns true when the
DEFAULT partition was pruned.
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrdoN_sXU52i=QDXe2k3WAo=EVry29r2+Tq2WYcn2xhEA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For partitioned tables with large numbers of partitions where queries are
able to prune all but a very small number of partitions, the time spent in
the planner looping over RelOptInfo.part_rels checking for non-NULL
RelOptInfos could become a large portion of the overall planning time.
Here we add a Bitmapset that records the non-pruned partitions. This
allows us to more efficiently skip the pruned partitions by looping over
the Bitmapset.
This will cause a very slight slow down in cases where no or not many
partitions could be pruned, however, those cases are already slow to plan
anyway and the overhead of looping over the Bitmapset would be
unmeasurable when compared with the other tasks such as path creation for
a large number of partitions.
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqnPx6JnUuPwaf5ao38zczrAb9mxt9gj4U1EKFfd4AqLA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Start up the checkpointer and bgwriter during crash recovery (except in
--single mode), as we do for replication. This wasn't done back in
commit cdd46c76 out of caution. Now it seems like a better idea to make
the environment as similar as possible in both cases. There may also be
some performance advantages.
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Tested-by: Jakub Wartak <Jakub.Wartak@tomtom.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJ8NRsqgkZEnsnRc2MFROBV-jCnacbYvtpptK2A9YYp9Q%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The comment didn't make sense anymore since at least 626eb021988. As it didn't
actually explain anything anyway, just remove it.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I failed to account for the possibility that when
ExecAppendAsyncEventWait() notifies multiple async-capable nodes using
postgres_fdw, a preceding node might invoke process_pending_request() to
process a pending asynchronous request made by a succeeding node. In
that case the succeeding node should produce a tuple to return to the
parent Append node from tuples fetched by process_pending_request() when
notified. Repair.
Per buildfarm via Michael Paquier. Back-patch to v14, like the previous
commit.
Thanks to Tom Lane for testing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YQP0UPT8KmPiHTMs%40paquier.xyz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As of commit 84f5c2908, executing SQL commands (via SPI or otherwise)
requires having either an active Portal, or a caller-established
active snapshot. We were simply Assert'ing that that's the case.
But we've now had a couple different reports of people testing
extensions that didn't meet this requirement, and were confused by
the resulting crash. Let's convert the Assert to a test-and-elog,
in hopes of making the issue clearer for extension authors.
Per gripes from Liu Huailing and RekGRpth. Back-patch to v11,
like the prior commit.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB6215671E3C5956A034A080DFBEEC9@OSZPR01MB6215.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17035-14607d308ac8643c@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Since e6241d8e0, no attribute needs a non-default value of this during
initdb, so let the usual machinery for defaults take care of it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a couple of related problems that arise when raising
numbers to very large powers.
Firstly, when raising a negative number to a very large integer power,
the result should be well-defined, but the previous code would only
cope if the exponent was small enough to go through power_var_int().
Otherwise it would throw an internal error, attempting to take the
logarithm of a negative number. Fix this by adding suitable handling
to the general case in power_var() to cope with negative bases,
checking for integer powers there.
Next, when raising a (positive or negative) number whose absolute
value is slightly less than 1 to a very large power, the result should
approach zero as the power is increased. However, in some cases, for
sufficiently large powers, this would lose all precision and return 1
instead of 0. This was due to the way that the local_rscale was being
calculated for the final full-precision calculation:
local_rscale = rscale + (int) val - ln_dweight + 8
The first two terms on the right hand side are meant to give the
number of significant digits required in the result ("val" being the
estimated result weight). However, this failed to account for the fact
that rscale is clipped to a maximum of NUMERIC_MAX_DISPLAY_SCALE
(1000), and the result weight might be less then -1000, causing their
sum to be negative, leading to a loss of precision. Fix this by
forcing the number of significant digits calculated to be nonnegative.
It's OK for it to be zero (when the result weight is less than -1000),
since the local_rscale value then includes a few extra digits to
ensure an accurate result.
Finally, add additional underflow checks to exp_var() and power_var(),
so that they consistently return zero for cases like this where the
result is indistinguishable from zero. Some paths through this code
already returned zero in such cases, but others were throwing overflow
errors.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Yugo Nagata.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCW6Dvq7+3wN3tt5jLj-FyOcUgT5xNoOqce5=6Su0bCR0w@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They are used in code that runs both during normal operation and during
WAL replay, and needs to behave differently during replay. Move them to
xlogutils.c, because that's where we have other helper functions used by
redo routines.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b3b71061-4919-e882-4857-27e370ab134a%40iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
StartupXLOG() is very long, this makes it a little bit more readable.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b3b71061-4919-e882-4857-27e370ab134a%40iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It might've been useful for debugging purposes, but meh. There's
'readSource' which does almost the same thing.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b3b71061-4919-e882-4857-27e370ab134a%40iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No need to use get_sync_bit() when we're calling pg_fsync() on the file.
We're not writing to the files, so it doesn't make any difference in
practice, but seems less surprising this way.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b3b71061-4919-e882-4857-27e370ab134a%40iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The starting point may not be exactly what the client requested; it
may be at the slot's confirmed_flush_lsn.
Also, upgrade the message from DEBUG1 to LOG when this happens.
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c5c861d576f2511732f8002c76245da587110b1c.camel%40j-davis.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It should always be the case that the last checkpoint record is still
readable, because otherwise, a crash would leave us in a situation
from which we can't recover. Therefore the test removed by this patch
should always succeed. For it to fail, either there has to be a serious
bug in the code someplace, or the user has to be manually modifying
pg_wal while crash recovery is running. If it's the first one, we
should fix the bug. If it's the second one, they should stop, or
anyway they're doing so at their own risk. In neither case does
a full checkpoint instead of an end-of-recovery record seem like a
clear winner. Furthermore, rarely-taken code paths are particularly
vulnerable to bugs, so let's simplify by getting rid of this one.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYmw==TOJ6EzYb_vcjyS09NkzrVKSyBKUUyo1zBEaJASA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
CheckpointLock was removed in commit d18e75664a, and commit ce197e91d0
updated a leftover comment in CreateCheckPoint, but there was another
copy of it in CreateRestartPoint still.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A pending asynchronous request is handled by process_pending_request(),
which previously not only processed an in-progress remote query but
performed ExecForeignScan() to produce a tuple to return to the local
server asynchronously from the result of the remote query. But that led
to a server crash when executing a query or led to an "InstrStartNode
called twice in a row" or "InstrEndLoop called on running node" failure
when doing EXPLAIN ANALYZE of it, in cases where the plan tree for it
contained multiple async-capable nodes accessing the same
initplan/subplan that contained multiple async-capable nodes scanning
the same foreign tables as for the parent async-capable nodes, as
reported by Andrey Lepikhov. The reason is that the second step in
process_pending_request() invoked when executing the initplan/subplan
for one of the parent async-capable nodes caused recursive execution of
the initplan/subplan for another of the parent async-capable nodes.
To fix, split process_pending_request() into the two steps and postpone
the second step until ForeignAsyncConfigureWait() is called for each of
the pending asynchronous requests. Also, in ExecAppendAsyncEventWait()
we assumed that FDWs would register at least one wait event in a
WaitEventSet created there when they were called from
ForeignAsyncConfigureWait() in that function, but allow FDWs to register
zero wait events in the WaitEventSet; modify ExecAppendAsyncEventWait()
to just return in that case.
Oversight in commit 27e1f1456. Back-patch to v14 where that commit went
in.
Andrey Lepikhov and Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fe5eaa19-1704-e4a4-76ee-3b9d37ade399@postgrespro.ru
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Oversight in commit 0926e96c49.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-By: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 14, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDeScrsHhLyEPYqN3sydg6PxAPVBboK=30xJfUVihNZDA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Buildfarm shows that this test has a further failure mode when a
checkpoint starts earlier than expected, so we detect a "checkpoint
completed" line that's not the one we want. Change the config to try
and prevent this.
Per buildfarm
While at it, update one comment that was forgotten in commit
d18e75664a2f.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210729.162038.534808353849568395.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a non-functional change only to refactor code to extract some
replication logic into static functions.
This is done as preparation for the 2PC streaming patch which also shares
this common logic.
Author: Peter Smith
Reviewed-By: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PuiSA8AiLcE2N5StzSKs46SQEP_vDOUD5fX2XCVtfZ7mQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a file is truncated, we must update minRecoveryPoint. Once a file is
truncated, there's no going back; it would not be safe to stop recovery
at a point earlier than that anymore.
Commit 7bffc9b7bf changed xact_redo_commit() so that it updates
minRecoveryPoint on truncation, but forgot to change xact_redo_abort().
Back-patch to all supported versions.
Reported-by: mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b029fce3-4fac-4265-968e-16f36ff4d075.mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's not clear what the semantics of negative strides would be, so throw
an error instead.
Per report from Bauyrzhan Sakhariyev
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKpL73vZmLuFVuwF26FJ%2BNk11PVHhAnQRoREFcA03x7znRoFvA%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch to v14
|
