| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is inconsistent since 1f7ef548ec2e where the definition of
gistFormTuple() has changed.
Author: Tender Wang
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNkjU95_HdioDVU=5yBq_Xt=GfBv=Od-0oKtiA006pWW7Q@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch builds on the work done in commit 745217a051 by enabling the
replication of generated columns alongside regular column changes through
a new publication parameter: publish_generated_columns.
Example usage:
CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR TABLE tab_gencol WITH (publish_generated_columns = true);
The column list takes precedence. If the generated columns are specified
in the column list, they will be replicated even if
'publish_generated_columns' is set to false. Conversely, if generated
columns are not included in the column list (assuming the user specifies a
column list), they will not be replicated even if
'publish_generated_columns' is true.
Author: Vignesh C, Shubham Khanna
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Amit Kapila, Hayato Kuroda, Shlok Kyal, Ajin Cherian, Hou Zhijie, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B80D17B2-2C8E-4C7D-87F2-E5B4BE3C069E@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The low variable has not been used since it was added in d168b666823
and can be safely removed. The variable is present in the Sedgewick
paper "Analysis of Shellsort and Related Algorithms" as a parameter
to the shellsort function, but our implementation does not use it.
Remove to improve readability of the code.
Author: Koki Nakamura <btnakamurakoukil@oss.nttdata.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8aeb7b3eda53ca4c65fbacf8f43628fb@oss.nttdata.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is difficult to maintain accurately, and it was probably already
somewhat incorrect, especially in the sql_drop and table_rewrite
categories.
The prior section already documented which DDL commands are *not*
supported (which was also slightly outdated), so let's expand that a
bit and just rely on that instead of listing out each command in full
detail.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACJufxE_UAuxcM08BW5oVsg34v0cFWoEt8yBa5xSAoKLmL6LTQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Supply a new memory manager for RuntimeDyld, to avoid crashes in
generated code caused by memory placement that can overflow a 32 bit
data type. This is a drop-in replacement for the
llvm::SectionMemoryManager class in the LLVM library, with Michael
Smith's proposed fix from
https://www.github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71968.
We hereby slurp it into our own source tree, after moving into a new
namespace llvm::backport and making some minor adjustments so that it
can be compiled with older LLVM versions as far back as 12. It's harder
to make it work on even older LLVM versions, but it doesn't seem likely
that people are really using them so that is not investigated for now.
The problem could also be addressed by switching to JITLink instead of
RuntimeDyld, and that is the LLVM project's recommended solution as
the latter is about to be deprecated. We'll have to do that soon enough
anyway, and then when the LLVM version support window advances far
enough in a few years we'll be able to delete this code. Unfortunately
that wouldn't be enough for PostgreSQL today: in most relevant versions
of LLVM, JITLink is missing or incomplete.
Several other projects have already back-ported this fix into their fork
of LLVM, which is a vote of confidence despite the lack of commit into
LLVM as of today. We don't have our own copy of LLVM so we can't do
exactly what they've done; instead we have a copy of the whole patched
class so we can pass an instance of it to RuntimeDyld.
The LLVM project hasn't chosen to commit the fix yet, and even if it
did, it wouldn't be back-ported into the releases of LLVM that most of
our users care about, so there is not much point in waiting any longer
for that. If they make further changes and commit it to LLVM 19 or 20,
we'll still need this for older versions, but we may want to
resynchronize our copy and update some comments.
The changes that we've had to make to our copy can be seen by diffing
our SectionMemoryManager.{h,cpp} files against the ones in the tree of
the pull request. Per the LLVM project's license requirements, a copy
is in SectionMemoryManager.LICENSE.
This should fix the spate of crash reports we've been receiving lately
from users on large memory ARM systems.
Back-patch to all supported releases.
Co-authored-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> (license aspects)
Reported-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_Xqr63qj%3DSx7HY6ZiiQ6R_JbX%2B-p6sTPwDYwTWZjUmjsYBg%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
adf97c156 gave ExprStates the ability to hash expressions and return a
single hash value. That commit supports seeding the hash value with an
initial value to have that blended into the final hash value.
Here we fix a hypothetical bug where if there are zero expressions to
hash, the initial value is stored in the wrong location. The existing
code stored the initial value in an intermediate location expecting that
when the expressions were hashed that those steps would store the final
hash value in the ExprState.resvalue field. However, that wouldn't happen
when there are zero expressions to hash. The correct thing to do instead
is to have a special case for zero expressions and when we hit that case,
store the initial value directly in the ExprState.resvalue. The reason
that this is a hypothetical bug is that no code currently calls
ExecBuildHash32Expr passing a non-zero initial value.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpMAL_zxbMRr1LOex3O7Y7R7ZN2i8iUFLQhqQiJMAg3qw@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PgStat_HashKey is currently initialized in a way that could result in
random data if the structure has any padding bytes. The structure
has no padding bytes currently, fortunately, but it could become a
problem should the structure change at some point in the future.
The code is changed to use some memset(0) so as any padding would be
handled properly, as it would be surprising to see random failures in
the pgstats entry lookups. PgStat_HashKey is a structure internal to
pgstats, and an ABI change could be possible in the scope of a bug fix,
so backpatch down to 15 where this has been introduced.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zyb7RW1y9dVfO0UH@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Backpatch-through: 15
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit reverts 3c5db1d6b0, and subsequent improvements and fixes
including 8036d73ae3, 867d396ccd, 3ac3ec580c, 0868d7ae70, 85b98b8d5a,
2520226c95, 014f9f34d2, e658038772, e1555645d7, 5035172e4a, 6cfebfe88b,
73da6b8d1b, and e546989a26.
The reason for reverting is a set of remaining issues. Most notably, the
stored procedure appears to need more effort than the utility statement
to turn the backend into a "snapshot-less" state. This makes an approach
to use stored procedures questionable.
Catversion is bumped.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zyhj2anOPRKtb0xW%40paquier.xyz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Tender Wang
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXN%3D3sH2sNw4nC3QGCEVw1Lftmw9m5y1Xje0bXK6ApDrsPQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
_bt_first doesn't necessarily hold onto a buffer pin on success exit.
Fix header comments that claimed that we'll always hold onto a pin.
Oversight in commit 2ed5b87f96.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove a local variable that was used to avoid overwriting strat_total
with the = operator strategy when a >= operator strategy key was already
included in the initial positioning/insertion scan keys by _bt_first
(for backwards scans it would have to be a <= key that was included).
_bt_first's strat_total local variable now simply tracks the operator
strategy of the final scan key that was included in the scan's insertion
scan key (barring the case where the !used_all_subkeys row compare path
adjusts strat_total in its own way).
_bt_first already treated >= keys (or <= keys) as = keys for initial
positioning purposes. There is no good reason to remember that that was
what happened; no later _bt_first step cares about the distinction.
Note, in particular, that the insertion scan key's 'nextkey' and
'backward' fields will be initialized the same way regardless.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=PKR6rB7qbx+Vnd7eqeB5VTcrW=iJvAsTsKbdG+kW_UA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Split ProcSleep into two functions: JoinWaitQueue and ProcSleep.
JoinWaitQueue is called while holding the partition lock, and inserts
the current process to the wait queue, while ProcSleep() does the
actual sleeping. ProcSleep() is now called without holding the
partition lock, and it no longer re-acquires the partition lock before
returning. That makes the wakeup a little cheaper. Once upon a time,
re-acquiring the partition lock was needed to prevent a signal handler
from longjmping out at a bad time, but these days our signal handlers
just set flags, and longjmping can only happen at points where we
explicitly run CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS().
If JoinWaitQueue detects an "early deadlock" before even joining the
wait queue, it returns without changing the shared lock entry, leaving
the cleanup of the shared lock entry to the caller. This makes the
handling of an early deadlock the same as the dontWait=true case.
One small user-visible side-effect of this refactoring is that we now
only set the 'ps' title to say "waiting" when we actually enter the
sleep, not when the lock is skipped because dontWait=true, or when a
deadlock is detected early before entering the sleep.
This eliminates the 'lockAwaited' global variable in proc.c, which was
largely redundant with 'awaitedLock' in lock.c
Note: Updating the local lock table is now the caller's responsibility.
JoinWaitQueue and ProcSleep are now only responsible for modifying the
shared state. Seems a little nicer that way.
Based on Thomas Munro's earlier patch and observation that ProcSleep
doesn't really need to re-acquire the partition lock.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7c2090cd-a72a-4e34-afaa-6dd2ef31440e@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LockAcquire is a long and complex function. Pushing more stuff to its
subroutines makes it a little more manageable.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7c2090cd-a72a-4e34-afaa-6dd2ef31440e@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, ProcSleep()'s caller was responsible for setting
MyProc->heldLocks, and we had comments to remind about that. But it
seems simpler to make ProcSleep() itself responsible for it.
ProcSleep() already set the other info about the lock its waiting for
(waitLock, waitProcLock and waitLockMode), so it is natural for it to
set heldLocks too.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7c2090cd-a72a-4e34-afaa-6dd2ef31440e@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
_bt_endpoint is a helper function for _bt_first that's called whenever
no useful insertion scan key can be used, and we need to lock and read
either the leftmost or rightmost leaf page in the index. Simplify and
document its preconditions, relieving its _bt_first caller from having
to end the parallel scan when it returns false.
Also stop unnecessarily invalidating the current scan position in nearby
code in both _bt_first and _bt_endpoint. This seems to have been
copy-pasted from _bt_readnextpage, where invalidating the scan's current
position really is necessary.
Follow-up to the refactoring work in commit 1bd4bc85.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We reach this case also e.g. when a deadlock is detected, not only
when we run out of memory.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7c2090cd-a72a-4e34-afaa-6dd2ef31440e@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Buildfarm member mamba fails to deduce that the function never uses this
variable without initializing it. Back-patch to v12, like commit
b412f402d1e020c5dac94f3bf4a005db69519b99.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A CacheInvalidateHeapTuple* callee might call
CatalogCacheInitializeCache(), which needs a relcache entry. Acquiring
a valid relcache entry might scan pg_class. Hence, to prevent
undetected LWLock self-deadlock, CacheInvalidateHeapTuple* callers must
not hold BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE on buffers of pg_class. Move the
CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace() before the BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE. No
back-patch, since I've reverted commit
243e9b40f1b2dd09d6e5bf91ebf6e822a2cd3704 from non-master branches.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin. Reviewed by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10ec0bc3-5933-1189-6bb8-5dec4114558e@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257 enlarged the work done
here under the pg_class heap buffer lock. Two preexisting actions are
best done before holding that lock. Both RelationGetNumberOfBlocks()
and visibilitymap_count() do I/O, and the latter might exclusive-lock a
visibility map buffer. Moving these reduces contention and risk of
undetected LWLock deadlock. Back-patch to v12, like that commit.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20241031200139.b4@rfd.leadboat.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
Oversight in commit 5bf748b8.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of talking about setting latches, which is a pretty low-level
mechanism, emphasize that they wake up other processes.
This is in preparation for replacing Latches with a new abstraction.
That's still work in progress, but this seems a little tidier anyway,
so let's get this refactoring out of the way already.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/391abe21-413e-4d91-a650-b663af49500c%40iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is in preparation for replacing Latches with a new abstraction.
That's still work in progress, but this seems a little tidier anyway,
so let's get this refactoring out of the way already.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/391abe21-413e-4d91-a650-b663af49500c%40iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After a closer lookup, this makes the all-zero check of the page more
expensive, so let's remove the new function call in bufpage.c. The
maths of the check were also incorrect, checking that the page was full
of zeros only for the first 1kB.
This brings back the code to the state it was at 49d6c7d8daba.
Per discussion with David Rowley and Bertrand Drouvot.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrXzPAr3FxoBuB7b3D-okNoNA2jxLun1rW8Yw5wkbqusw@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This new function tests if a memory region starting at a given location
for a defined length is made only of zeroes. This unifies in a single
path the all-zero checks that were happening in a couple of places of
the backend code:
- For pgstats entries of relation, checkpointer and bgwriter, where
some "all_zeroes" variables were previously used with memcpy().
- For all-zero buffer pages in PageIsVerifiedExtended().
This new function uses the same forward scan as the check for all-zero
buffer pages, applying it to the three pgstats paths mentioned above.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Heikki Linnakangas, Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZupUDDyf1hHI4ibn@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This function takes in input an array, and reverses the position of all
its elements. This operation only affects the first dimension of the
array, like array_shuffle().
The implementation structure is inspired by array_shuffle(), with a
subroutine called array_reverse_n() that may come in handy in the
future, should more functions able to reverse portions of arrays be
introduced.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Aleksander Alekseev
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Tom Lane, Vladlen Popolitov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TMpeO_ke+QGOaAx9xdJuxa7r=49-anMh3G5476e3CX1CA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch responds to a comment that I (tgl) made in the
discussion leading up to 774171c4f, that really all errors
occurring during raw parsing should provide error cursors.
Syntax errors reported by Bison will have one, and most of
the handwritten ereport's in gram.y already provide one,
but there were a few stragglers.
(It is not claimed that this handles every failure reachable
during raw parsing --- out-of-memory is an obvious exception.
But this makes a good start on cases that are likely to occur.)
While we're at it, clean up the reported positions for errors
associated with LIMIT/OFFSET clauses. Previously we were
relying on applying exprLocation() to the contained expressions,
but that leads to slightly odd cursor placement, e.g.
regression=# (select * from foo limit 10) limit 10;
ERROR: multiple LIMIT clauses not allowed
LINE 1: (select * from foo limit 10) limit 10;
^
We can afford to keep a little more state in the transient
SelectLimit structs in order to make that better.
Jian He and Tom Lane (extracted from a larger patch by Jian,
with some additional work by me)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxEmONE3P2En=jopZy1m=cCCUs65M4+1o52MW5og9oaUPA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows an error cursor to be supplied for a bunch of
bad-function-definition errors that previously lacked one,
or that cheated a bit by pointing at the contained type name
when the error isn't really about that.
Bump catversion from an abundance of caution --- I don't think
this node type can actually appear in stored views/rules, but
better safe than sorry.
Jian He and Tom Lane (extracted from a larger patch by Jian,
with some additional work by me)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxEmONE3P2En=jopZy1m=cCCUs65M4+1o52MW5og9oaUPA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Buildfarm member 'prion', which is configured with
-DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, failed with errors
like this:
ERROR: could not read blocks 0..0 in file "global/2672": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
while running a parallel test group that includes VACUUM FULL on some
catalog tables among other things. I was not able to reproduce that
just by running the tests with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE
-DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, even though 'prion' hit it on first run
after commit 2b9b8ebbf8, so there might be something else that makes
it more susceptible to the race. However, I was able to reproduce it
by adding another test to the same test group that runs "vacuum full
pg_database" repeatedly.
The problem is that RelationReloadIndexInfo() no longer calls
RelationInitPhysicalAddr() on a nailed, shared index, when an
invalidation happens early during backend startup, before the critical
relcaches have been built. Before commit 2b9b8ebbf8, that was done by
RelationReloadNailed(), but it went missing from that path. Add it
back as an explicit step.
Broken by commit 2b9b8ebbf8, which refactored these functions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/db876575-8f5b-4193-a538-df7e1f92d47a%40iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A few comments contained duplicate "the" in sentences, fix by removing
one occurrence.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2aEEiPwGJmPdzBxROVvs8n75yCjKz4K1f1B2TdWpzxTA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The old RelationClearRelation function did different things depending
on the arguments and circumstances. It could:
a) remove the relation completely from relcache (rebuild == false),
b) mark the entry as invalid (rebuild == true, but not in xact), or
c) rebuild the entry (rebuild == true).
Different callers used it for different purposes, and often assumed a
particular behavior, which was confusing. Split it into three
different functions, one for each of the above actions (one of them,
RelationInvalidateRelation, was already added in commit e6cd857726).
Move the responsibility of choosing the action and calling the right
function to the callers.
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9c9e8908-7b3e-4ce7-85a8-00c0e165a3d6%40iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RelationClearRelation(rebuild == true) calls RelationReloadIndexInfo()
for indexes. We can rely on that in RelationIdGetRelation(), instead
of calling RelationReloadIndexInfo() directly. That simplifies the
code a little.
In the passing, add a comment in RelationBuildLocalRelation()
explaining why it doesn't call RelationInitIndexAccessInfo(). It's
because at index creation, it's called before the pg_index row has
been created. That's also the reason that RelationClearRelation()
still needs a special case to go through the full-blown rebuild if the
index support information in the relcache entry hasn't been populated
yet.
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9c9e8908-7b3e-4ce7-85a8-00c0e165a3d6%40iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
bf6c614a2 did some conversion work to use ExprState instead of manually
calling equality functions to check if one set of values is not distinct
from another set. That patch removed many of the fields that became
redundant as a result of that change, but it forgot to remove
SubPlanState.tab_eq_funcs. Fix that.
In passing, fix the header comment for TupleHashEntryData to correctly
spell the field name it's talking about.
Author: Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+FpmFeycdombFzrjZw7Rmc29CVm4OOzCWwu=dVBQ6q=PX8SvQ@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrWR2jYVhec=COyF2g2BE_ns91NDsCHAMFiXbyhEujKdQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow-up to bugfix commit 763d65ae. Technically this new assertion is
redundant with the assertion recently added to _bt_readpage by that same
commit, but it seems like a good idea to have both.
The new assertion makes it clear that we expect to call _bt_readnextpage
when there's another primitive index scan scheduled, though only when
needed as the final step of ending the current primitive scan.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Strictly speaking, we only need to make sure to leave the scan's array
keys in their final positions (final for the current scan direction) to
handle SAOP array exhaustion because btgettuple might only return a
subset of the items for the final page (final for the current scan
direction), before the scan changes direction. While it's typical for
so->currPos to be invalidated shortly after the scan's arrays are first
exhausted, and while so->currPos invalidation does obviate the need to
leave the scan's arrays in any particular state, we can't rely on any of
that actually happening when handling array exhaustion. Adjust comments
to make all of that a lot clearer.
Oversight in commit 5bf748b8, which enhanced nbtree ScalarArrayOp
execution.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A bug in nbtree's handling of primitive index scan scheduling could lead
to wrong answers when a scrollable cursor was used with an index scan
that had a SAOP index qual. Wrong answers were only possible when the
scan direction changed after a primitive scan was scheduled, but before
_bt_next was asked to fetch the next tuple in line (i.e. for things to
break, _bt_next had to be denied the opportunity to step off the page in
the same direction as the one used when the primscan was scheduled).
Furthermore, the issue only occurred when the page in question happened
to be the first page to be visited by the entire top-level scan; the
issue hinged upon the cursor backing up to the absolute beginning of the
key space that it returns tuples from (fetching in the opposite scan
direction across a "primitive scan boundary" always worked correctly).
To fix, make _bt_next unset the "needs primitive index scan" flag when
it detects that the current scan direction is not the one that was used
by _bt_readpage back when the primitive scan in question was scheduled.
This fixes the cases that are known to be faulty, and also seems like a
good idea on general robustness grounds.
Affected scrollable cursor cases now avoid a spurious primitive index
scan when they fetch backwards to the absolute start of the key space to
be visited by their cursor. Fetching backwards now only returns those
tuples at the start of the scan, as expected. It'll also be okay to
once again fetch forwards from the start at that point, since the scan
will be left in a state that's exactly consistent with the state it was
in before any tuples were ever fetched, as expected.
Oversight in commit 5bf748b8, which enhanced nbtree ScalarArrayOp
execution.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wznv49bFsE2jkt4GuZ0tU2C91dEST=50egzjY2FeOcHL4Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 17-, where commit 5bf748b8 first appears.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* In DetachPartitionFinalize() we were applying a tuple conversion map
to tuples that didn't need one, which can lead to erratic behavior if
a partitioned table has a partition with a different column order, as
reported by Alexander Lakhin. This was introduced by 53af9491a043.
Don't do that. Also, modify a recently added test case to exercise
this.
* The same function as well as CloneFkReferenced() were acquiring
AccessShareLock on a partition, only to have CreateTrigger() later
acquire ShareRowExclusiveLock on it. This can lead to deadlock by
lock escalation, unnecessarily. Avoid that by acquiring the stronger
lock to begin with. This probably dates back to branch 12, but I have
never seen a report of this being a problem in the field.
* Innocuous but wasteful: also introduced by 53af9491a043, we were
reading a pg_constraint tuple from syscache that we don't need, as
reported by Tender Wang. Don't.
Backpatch to 15.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/461e9c26-2076-8224-e119-84998b6a784e@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit allows logical replication to publish and replicate generated
columns when explicitly listed in the column list. We also ensured that
the generated columns were copied during the initial tablesync when they
were published.
We will allow to replicate generated columns even when they are not
specified in the column list (via a new publication option) in a separate
commit.
The motivation of this work is to allow replication for cases where the
client doesn't have generated columns. For example, the case where one is
trying to replicate data from Postgres to the non-Postgres database.
Author: Shubham Khanna, Vignesh C, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Hayato Kuroda, Shlok Kyal, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B80D17B2-2C8E-4C7D-87F2-E5B4BE3C069E@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/98b2fcf0-f701-369e-d63d-6be9739ce17c@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257 changed inplace updates
to wait for heap_update() commands like GRANT TABLE and GRANT DATABASE.
By keeping the pin during that wait, a sequence of autovacuum workers
and an uncommitted GRANT starved one foreground LockBufferForCleanup()
for six minutes, on buildfarm member sarus. Prevent, at the cost of a
bit of complexity. Back-patch to v12, like the earlier commit. That
commit and heap_inplace_lock() have not yet appeared in any release.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20241026184936.ae.nmisch@google.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move the CreateStmt down to the branch that it's used in, thus
preventing the makeNode() call in cases where the CreateStmt isn't used.
Author: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAq=06YPWPhS+yyTbCwv5JLKRz8rm3dWx6JR5Uj_d_fQDA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A pg_depend entry between a partitioned table and its table access
method was missing when using CREATE TABLE .. USING with an unpinned
access method. DROP ACCESS METHOD could be used, while it should be
blocked if CASCADE is not specified, even if there was a partitioned
table that depends on the table access method. pg_class.relam would
then hold an orphaned OID value still pointing to the AM dropped.
The problem is fixed by adding a dependency between the partitioned
table and its table access method if set when the relation is created.
A test checking the contents of pg_depend in this case is added.
Issue introduced in 374c7a229042, that has added support for CREATE
TABLE .. USING for partitioned tables.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18674-1ef01eceec278fab@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 17
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I assumed that all index_drop() callers set an active snapshot
beforehand, but that is evidently not true. One counterexample is
autovacuum, which doesn't set an active snapshot when cleaning up
orphan temp indexes. To fix, unconditionally push an active
snapshot before updating pg_index in index_drop().
Oversight in commit b52adbad46.
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Stepan Neretin, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBgF9etQrXbN9or_YHsmBRJHHNUEkhHp9rGK9CyQv5aTQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Revert commit 924e03917 in favor of adding code to convert \r\n to \n
explicitly, on Windows only. The idea of letting text mode do the
work fails for a couple of reasons:
* Per Microsoft documentation, text mode also causes control-Z to be
interpreted as end-of-file. While it may be unlikely that extension
scripts contain control-Z, we've historically allowed it, and breaking
the case doesn't seem wise.
* Apparently, on some Windows configurations, "r" mode is interpreted
as binary not text mode. We could force it with "rt" but that would
be inconsistent with our code elsewhere, and it would still require
Windows-specific coding.
Thanks to Alexander Lakhin for investigation.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/79284195-4993-7b00-f6df-8db28ca60fa3@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
broken by commit e18512c000e
Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tweak some code comments for clarity, and relocate some local variable
declarations to the scope where they're actually used.
Follow-up to recent commit 1bd4bc85.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously the default value of streaming option for a subscription was
'off'. The parallel option indicates that the changes in large
transactions (greater than logical_decoding_work_mem) are to be applied
directly via one of the parallel apply workers, if available.
The parallel mode was introduced in 16, but we refrain from enabling it by
default to avoid seeing any unpleasant behavior in the existing
applications. However we haven't found any such report yet, so this is a
good time to enable it by default.
Reported-by: Vignesh C
Author: Hayato Kuroda, Masahiko Sawada, Peter Smith, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm1=MedhW23NuoePJTmonwsMSp80ddsw+sEJs0GUMC_kqQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some utility statements contain queries that can be planned and
executed: CREATE TABLE AS and DECLARE CURSOR. This commit adds query ID
computation for the inner queries executed by these two utility
commands, with and without EXPLAIN. This change leads to four new
callers of JumbleQuery() and post_parse_analyze_hook() so as extensions
can decide what to do with this new data.
Previously, extensions relying on the query ID, like pg_stat_statements,
were not able to track these nested queries as the query_id was 0.
For pg_stat_statements, this commit leads to additions under !toplevel
when pg_stat_statements.track is set to "all", as shown in its
regression tests. The output of EXPLAIN for these two utilities gains a
"Query Identifier" if compute_query_id is enabled.
Author: Anthonin Bonnefoy
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Jian He
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_XqqM6S9bQ2qd=75W+yKATwoazxSNhv5sjW06fjGAtHbTUA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
Oversight in commit d088ba5a.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as determined by IWYU
These are mostly issues that are new since commit dbbca2cf299.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0df1d5b1-8ca8-4f84-93be-121081bde049%40eisentraut.org
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Andreas Karlsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/59da7ee4-5e1a-4727-b464-a603c6ed84cd@proxel.se
|
