aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut2020-06-22
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: https://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 434134899af310153f7511ccaa3f376e4c817e66
* Fix masking of SP-GiST pages during xlog consistency checkAlexander Korotkov2020-06-20
| | | | | | | | | | spg_mask() didn't take into account that pd_lower equal to SizeOfPageHeaderData is still valid value. This commit fixes that. Backpatch to 11, where spg_mask() pg_lower check was introduced. Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200615131405.GM52676%40paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 11
* Fix deduplication "single value" strategy bug.Peter Geoghegan2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It was possible for deduplication's single value strategy to mistakenly believe that a very small duplicate tuple counts as one of the six large tuples that it aims to leave behind after the page finally splits. This could cause slightly suboptimal space utilization with very low cardinality indexes, though only under fairly narrow conditions. To fix, be particular about what kind of tuple counts as a maxpostingsize-capped tuple. This avoids confusion in the event of a small tuple that gets "wedged" between two large tuples, where all tuples on the page are duplicates of the same value. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=Y+sgSFc-O3LpiZX-POx2bC+okec2KafERHuzdVa7-rQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 13-, where deduplication was introduced (by commit 0d861bbb)
* Fix issues in invalidation of obsolete replication slots.Fujii Masao2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit fixes the following issues. 1. There is the case where the slot is dropped while trying to invalidate it. InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots() did not handle this case, and which could cause checkpoint to fail. 2. InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots() could emit the same log message multiple times unnecessary. It should be logged only once. 3. When marking the slot as used, we always searched the target slot from all the replication slots even if we already found it. This could cause useless waste of cycles. Back-patch to v13 where these issues were added as a part of max_slot_wal_keep_size code. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/66c05b67-3396-042c-1b41-bfa6c3ddcf82@oss.nttdata.com
* Fix EXPLAIN ANALYZE for parallel HashAgg plansDavid Rowley2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since 1f39bce02, HashAgg nodes have had the ability to spill to disk when memory consumption exceeds work_mem. That commit added new properties to EXPLAIN ANALYZE to show the maximum memory usage and disk usage, however, it didn't quite go as far as showing that information for parallel workers. Since workers may have experienced something very different from the main process, we should show this information per worker, as is done in Sort. Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpEKbfZa18mM1TD7qV6PG+w97pwCWq5tVD0dX7e11gRJw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13, where the hashagg spilling code was added.
* Fix deadlock danger when atomic ops are done under spinlock.Andres Freund2020-06-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This was a danger only for --disable-spinlocks in combination with atomic operations unsupported by the current platform. While atomics.c was careful to signal that a separate semaphore ought to be used when spinlock emulation is active, spin.c didn't actually implement that mechanism. That's my (Andres') fault, it seems to have gotten lost during the development of the atomic operations support. Fix that issue and add test for nesting atomic operations inside a spinlock. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200605023302.g6v3ydozy5txifji@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.5-
* Fix oldest xmin and LSN computation across repslots after advancingMichael Paquier2020-06-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Advancing a replication slot did not recompute the oldest xmin and LSN values across replication slots, preventing resource removal like segments not recycled at checkpoint time. The original commit that introduced the slot advancing in 9c7d06d never did the update of those oldest values, and b0afdca removed this code. This commit adds a TAP test to check segment recycling with advancing for physical slots, enforcing an extra segment switch before advancing to check if the segment gets correctly recycled after a checkpoint. Reported-by: Andres Freund Reviewed-by: Alexey Kondratov, Kyptaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200609171904.kpltxxvjzislidks@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch-through: 11
* spinlock emulation: Fix bug when more than INT_MAX spinlocks are initialized.Andres Freund2020-06-17
| | | | | | | | | | Once the counter goes negative we ended up with spinlocks that errored out on first use (due to check in tas_sema). Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200606023103.avzrctgv7476xj7i@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.5-
* Avoid potential spinlock in a signal handler as part of global barriers.Andres Freund2020-06-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | On platforms without support for 64bit atomic operations where we also cannot rely on 64bit reads to have single copy atomicity, such atomics are implemented using a spinlock based fallback. That means it's not safe to even read such atomics from within a signal handler (since the signal handler might run when the spinlock already is held). To avoid this issue defer global barrier processing out of the signal handler. Instead of checking local / shared barrier generation to determine whether to set ProcSignalBarrierPending, introduce PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER and always set ProcSignalBarrierPending when receiving such a signal. Additionally avoid redundant work in ProcessProcSignalBarrier if ProcSignalBarrierPending is unnecessarily. Also do a small amount of other polishing. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200609193723.eu5ilsjxwdpyxhgz@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 13-, where the code was introduced.
* Fix buffile.c error handling.Thomas Munro2020-06-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Convert buffile.c error handling to use ereport. This fixes cases where I/O errors were indistinguishable from EOF or not reported. Also remove "%m" from error messages where errno would be bogus. While we're modifying those strings, add block numbers and short read byte counts where appropriate. Back-patch to all supported releases. Reported-by: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJE04G%3D8TLK0DLypT_27D9dR8F1RQgNp0jK6qR0tZGWOw%40mail.gmail.com
* Fix behavior of float aggregates for single Inf or NaN inputs.Tom Lane2020-06-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When there is just one non-null input value, and it is infinity or NaN, aggregates such as stddev_pop and covar_pop should produce a NaN result, because the calculation is not well-defined. They used to do so, but since we adopted Youngs-Cramer aggregation in commit e954a727f, they produced zero instead. That's an oversight, so fix it. Add tests exercising these edge cases. Affected aggregates are var_pop(double precision) stddev_pop(double precision) var_pop(real) stddev_pop(real) regr_sxx(double precision,double precision) regr_syy(double precision,double precision) regr_sxy(double precision,double precision) regr_r2(double precision,double precision) regr_slope(double precision,double precision) regr_intercept(double precision,double precision) covar_pop(double precision,double precision) corr(double precision,double precision) Back-patch to v12 where the behavior change was accidentally introduced. Report and patch by me; thanks to Dean Rasheed for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/353062.1591898766@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Silence _bt_check_unique compiler warning.Peter Geoghegan2020-06-13
| | | | | Reported-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/841649.1592065060@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Add missing extern keyword for a couple of numutils functionsDavid Rowley2020-06-13
| | | | | | | | | In passing, also remove a few surplus empty lines from pg_ltoa and pg_ulltoa_n in numutils.c Reported-by: Andrew Gierth Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87y2ou3xuh.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk Backpatch-through: 13, where these changes were introduced
* Improve comments for [Heap]CheckForSerializableConflictOut().Thomas Munro2020-06-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | Rewrite the documentation of these functions, in light of recent bug fix commit 5940ffb2. Back-patch to 13 where the check-for-conflict-out code was split up into AM-specific and generic parts, and new documentation was added that now looked wrong. Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/db7b729d-0226-d162-a126-8a8ab2dc4443%40jepsen.io
* Fix mishandling of NaN counts in numeric_[avg_]combine.Tom Lane2020-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When merging two NumericAggStates, the code missed adding the new state's NaNcount unless its N was also nonzero; since those counts are independent, this is wrong. This would only have visible effect if some partial aggregate scans found only NaNs while earlier ones found only non-NaNs; then we could end up falsely deciding that there were no NaNs and fail to return a NaN final result as expected. That's pretty improbable, so it's no surprise this hasn't been reported from the field. Still, it's a bug. I didn't try to produce a regression test that would show the bug, but I did notice that these functions weren't being reached at all in our regression tests, so I improved the tests to at least exercise them. With these additions, I see pretty complete code coverage on the aggregation-related functions in numeric.c. Back-patch to 9.6 where this code was introduced. (I only added the improved test case as far back as v10, though, since the relevant part of aggregates.sql isn't there at all in 9.6.)
* Rework HashAgg GUCs.Jeff Davis2020-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Eliminate enable_groupingsets_hash_disk, which was primarily useful for testing grouping sets that use HashAgg and spill. Instead, hack the table stats to convince the planner to choose hashed aggregation for grouping sets that will spill to disk. Suggested by Melanie Plageman. Rename enable_hashagg_disk to hashagg_avoid_disk_plan, and invert the meaning of on/off. The new name indicates more strongly that it only affects the planner. Also, the word "avoid" is less definite, which should avoid surprises when HashAgg still needs to use the disk. Change suggested by Justin Pryzby, though I chose a different GUC name. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_aisiENMsPM2gC4oUY1hHG3yrCwY-fXUg22C6_MJUwQdA%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200610021544.GA14879@telsasoft.com Backpatch-through: 13
* Avoid update conflict out serialization anomalies.Peter Geoghegan2020-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SSI's HeapCheckForSerializableConflictOut() test failed to correctly handle conditions involving a concurrently inserted tuple which is later concurrently updated by a separate transaction . A SELECT statement that called HeapCheckForSerializableConflictOut() could end up using the same XID (updater's XID) for both the original tuple, and the successor tuple, missing the XID of the xact that created the original tuple entirely. This only happened when neither tuple from the chain was visible to the transaction's MVCC snapshot. The observable symptoms of this bug were subtle. A pair of transactions could commit, with the later transaction failing to observe the effects of the earlier transaction (because of the confusion created by the update to the non-visible row). This bug dates all the way back to commit dafaa3ef, which added SSI. To fix, make sure that we check the xmin of concurrently inserted tuples that happen to also have been updated concurrently. Author: Peter Geoghegan Reported-By: Kyle Kingsbury Reviewed-By: Thomas Munro Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/db7b729d-0226-d162-a126-8a8ab2dc4443@jepsen.io Backpatch: All supported versions
* Update description of parameter password_encryptionPeter Eisentraut2020-06-10
| | | | | | | The previous description string still described the pre-PostgreSQL 10 (pre eb61136dc75a76caef8460fa939244d8593100f2) behavior of selecting between encrypted and unencrypted, but it is now choosing between encryption algorithms.
* Fix ReorderBuffer memory overflow check.Amit Kapila2020-06-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit cec2edfa78 introduced logical_decoding_work_mem to limit ReorderBuffer memory usage. We spill the changes once the memory occupied by changes exceeds logical_decoding_work_mem. There was an assumption in the code that by evicting the largest (sub)transaction we will come under the memory limit as the selected transaction will be at least as large as the most recent change (which caused us to go over the memory limit). However, that is not true because a user can reduce the logical_decoding_work_mem to a smaller value before the most recent change. We fix it by allowing to evict the transactions until we reach under the memory limit. Reported-by: Fujii Masao Author: Amit Kapila Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2b7ba291-22e0-a187-d167-9e5309a3458d@oss.nttdata.com
* Spelling adjustmentsPeter Eisentraut2020-06-09
| | | | similar to 0fd2a79a637f9f96b9830524823df0454e962f96
* Fix invalid function references in a few commentsDavid Rowley2020-06-09
| | | | | | | These appear to have been forgotten when the functions were renamed in 1fd687a03. Backpatch-through: 13, where the functions were renamed
* Fix HashAgg regression from choosing too many initial buckets.Jeff Davis2020-06-08
| | | | | | | | Diagnosis by Andres. Reported-by: Pavel Stehule Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRDLVakD5Aagt3yZeEQeTeEWaS3YE5h8XC3Q3qJ6TYkc2Q%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
* Fix locking bugs that could corrupt pg_control.Thomas Munro2020-06-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The redo routines for XLOG_CHECKPOINT_{ONLINE,SHUTDOWN} must acquire ControlFileLock before modifying ControlFile->checkPointCopy, or the checkpointer could write out a control file with a bad checksum. Likewise, XLogReportParameters() must acquire ControlFileLock before modifying ControlFile and calling UpdateControlFile(). Back-patch to all supported releases. Author: Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com> Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/70BF24D6-DC51-443F-B55A-95735803842A%40amazon.com
* Fix crash in WAL sender when starting physical replicationMichael Paquier2020-06-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since database connections can be used with WAL senders in 9.4, it is possible to use physical replication. This commit fixes a crash when starting physical replication with a WAL sender using a database connection, caused by the refactoring done in 850196b. There have been discussions about forbidding the use of physical replication in a database connection, but this is left for later, taking care only of the crash new to 13. While on it, add a test to check for a failure when attempting logical replication if the WAL sender does not have a database connection. This part is extracted from a larger patch by Kyotaro Horiguchi. Reported-by: Vladimir Sitnikov Author: Michael Paquier, Kyotaro Horiguchi Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB=Je-GOWMj1PTPkeUhjqQp-4W3=nW-pXe2Hjax6rJFffB5_Aw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
* pgindent run prior to branching v13.Tom Lane2020-06-07
| | | | | pgperltidy and reformat-dat-files too, though those didn't find anything to change.
* Fix platform-specific performance regression in logtape.c.Jeff Davis2020-06-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 24d85952 made a change that indirectly caused a performance regression by triggering a change in the way GCC optimizes memcpy() on some platforms. The behavior seemed to contradict a GCC document, so I filed a report: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95556 This patch implements a narrow workaround which eliminates the regression I observed. The workaround is benign enough that it seems unlikely to cause a different regression on another platform. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/99b2eab335c1592c925d8143979c8e9e81e1575f.camel@j-davis.com
* Spelling adjustmentsPeter Eisentraut2020-06-07
|
* Formatting and punctuation improvements in postgresql.conf.samplePeter Eisentraut2020-06-07
|
* Improve ineq_histogram_selectivity's behavior for non-default orderings.Tom Lane2020-06-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ineq_histogram_selectivity() can be invoked in situations where the ordering we care about is not that of the column's histogram. We could be considering some other collation, or even more drastically, the query operator might not agree at all with what was used to construct the histogram. (We'll get here for anything using scalarineqsel-based estimators, so that's quite likely to happen for extension operators.) Up to now we just ignored this issue and assumed we were dealing with an operator/collation whose sort order exactly matches the histogram, possibly resulting in junk estimates if the binary search gets confused. It's past time to improve that, since the use of nondefault collations is increasing. What we can do is verify that the given operator and collation match what's recorded in pg_statistic, and use the existing code only if so. When they don't match, instead execute the operator against each histogram entry, and take the fraction of successes as our selectivity estimate. This gives an estimate that is probably good to about 1/histogram_size, with no assumptions about ordering. (The quality of the estimate is likely to degrade near the ends of the value range, since the two orderings probably don't agree on what is an extremal value; but this is surely going to be more reliable than what we did before.) At some point we might further improve matters by storing more than one histogram calculated according to different orderings. But this code would still be good fallback logic when no matches exist, so that is not an argument for not doing this. While here, also improve get_variable_range() to deal more honestly with non-default collations. This isn't back-patchable, because it requires adding another argument to ineq_histogram_selectivity, and because it might have significant impact on the estimation results for extension operators relying on scalarineqsel --- mostly for the better, one hopes, but in any case destabilizing plan choices in back branches is best avoided. Per investigation of a report from James Lucas. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAFmbbOvfi=wMM=3qRsPunBSLb8BFREno2oOzSBS=mzfLPKABw@mail.gmail.com
* Use query collation, not column's collation, while examining statistics.Tom Lane2020-06-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 5e0928005 changed the planner so that, instead of blindly using DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID when invoking operators for selectivity estimation, it would use the collation of the column whose statistics we're considering. This was recognized as still being not quite the right thing, but it seemed like a good incremental improvement. However, shortly thereafter we introduced nondeterministic collations, and that creates cases where operators can fail if they're passed the wrong collation. We don't want planning to fail in cases where the query itself would work, so this means that we *must* use the query's collation when invoking operators for estimation purposes. The only real problem this creates is in ineq_histogram_selectivity, where the binary search might produce a garbage answer if we perform comparisons using a different collation than the column's histogram is ordered with. However, when the query's collation is significantly different from the column's default collation, the estimate we previously generated would be pretty irrelevant anyway; so it's not clear that this will result in noticeably worse estimates in practice. (A follow-on patch will improve this situation in HEAD, but it seems too invasive for back-patch.) The patch requires changing the signatures of mcv_selectivity and allied functions, which are exported and very possibly are used by extensions. In HEAD, I just did that, but an API/ABI break of this sort isn't acceptable in stable branches. Therefore, in v12 the patch introduces "mcv_selectivity_ext" and so on, with signatures matching HEAD, and makes the old functions into wrappers that assume DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID should be used. That does not match the prior behavior, but it should avoid risk of failure in most cases. (In practice, I think most extension datatypes aren't collation-aware, so the change probably doesn't matter to them.) Per report from James Lucas. Back-patch to v12 where the problem was introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAFmbbOvfi=wMM=3qRsPunBSLb8BFREno2oOzSBS=mzfLPKABw@mail.gmail.com
* Preserve pg_index.indisreplident across REINDEX CONCURRENTLYMichael Paquier2020-06-05
| | | | | | | | | | | If the flag value is lost, logical decoding would work the same way as REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING, meaning that no old tuple values would be included in the changes anymore produced by logical decoding. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200603065340.GK89559@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 12
* Reject "23:59:60.nnn" in datetime input.Tom Lane2020-06-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's intentional that we don't allow values greater than 24 hours, while we do allow "24:00:00" as well as "23:59:60" as inputs. However, the range check was miscoded in such a way that it would accept "23:59:60.nnn" with a nonzero fraction. For time or timetz, the stored result would then be greater than "24:00:00" which would fail dump/reload, not to mention possibly confusing other operations. Fix by explicitly calculating the result and making sure it does not exceed 24 hours. (This calculation is redundant with what will happen later in tm2time or tm2timetz. Maybe someday somebody will find that annoying enough to justify refactoring to avoid the duplication; but that seems too invasive for a back-patched bug fix, and the cost is probably unmeasurable anyway.) Note that this change also rejects such input as the time portion of a timestamp(tz) value. Back-patch to v10. The bug is far older, but to change this pre-v10 we'd need to ensure that the logic behaves sanely with float timestamps, which is possibly nontrivial due to roundoff considerations. Doesn't really seem worth troubling with. Per report from Christoph Berg. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200520125807.GB296739@msg.df7cb.de
* Fix comment in be-secure-openssl.cMichael Paquier2020-06-04
| | | | | | | | Since 573bd08, hardcoded DH parameters have been moved to a different file, making the comment on top of load_dh_buffer() incorrect. Author: Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/D9492CCB-9A91-4181-A847-1779630BE2A7@yesql.se
* Fix instance of elog() called while holding a spinlockMichael Paquier2020-06-04
| | | | | | | | This broke the project rule to not call any complex code while a spinlock is held. Issue introduced by b89e151. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200602.161518.1399689010416646074.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Don't call palloc() while holding a spinlock, either.Tom Lane2020-06-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix some more violations of the "only straight-line code inside a spinlock" rule. These are hazardous not only because they risk holding the lock for an excessively long time, but because it's possible for palloc to throw elog(ERROR), leaving a stuck spinlock behind. copy_replication_slot() had two separate places that did pallocs while holding a spinlock. We can make the code simpler and safer by copying the whole ReplicationSlot struct into a local variable while holding the spinlock, and then referencing that copy. (While that's arguably more cycles than we really need to spend holding the lock, the struct isn't all that big, and this way seems far more maintainable than copying fields piecemeal. Anyway this is surely much cheaper than a palloc.) That bug goes back to v12. InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots() not only did a palloc while holding a spinlock, but for extra sloppiness then leaked the memory --- probably for the lifetime of the checkpointer process, though I didn't try to verify that. Fortunately that silliness is new in HEAD. pg_get_replication_slots() had a cosmetic violation of the rule, in that it only assumed it's safe to call namecpy() while holding a spinlock. Still, that's a hazard waiting to bite somebody, and there were some other cosmetic coding-rule violations in the same function, so clean it up. I back-patched this as far as v10; the code exists before that but it looks different, and this didn't seem important enough to adapt the patch further back. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200602.161518.1399689010416646074.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
* Don't call elog() while holding spinlock.Fujii Masao2020-06-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | Previously UpdateSpillStats() called elog(DEBUG2) while holding the spinlock even though the local variables that the elog() accesses don't need to be protected by the lock. Since spinlocks are intended for very short-term locks, they should not be used when calling elog(DEBUG2). So this commit moves that elog() out of spinlock period. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200602.161518.1399689010416646074.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
* Use correct and consistent unit abbreviationPeter Eisentraut2020-06-01
|
* Fix use-after-release mistake in currtid() and currtid2() for viewsMichael Paquier2020-06-01
| | | | | | | | | | This issue has been present since the introduction of this code as of a3519a2 from 2002, and has been found by buildfarm member prion that uses RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE via the tests introduced recently in e786be5. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200601022055.GB4121@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Fix crashes with currtid() and currtid2()Michael Paquier2020-06-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A relation that has no storage initializes rd_tableam to NULL, which caused those two functions to crash because of a pointer dereference. Note that in 11 and older versions, this has always failed with a confusing error "could not open file". These two functions are used by the Postgres ODBC driver, which requires them only when connecting to a backend strictly older than 8.1. When connected to 8.2 or a newer version, the driver uses a RETURNING clause instead whose support has been added in 8.2, so it should be possible to just remove both functions in the future. This is left as an issue to address later. While on it, add more regression tests for those functions as we never really had coverage for them, and for aggregates of TIDs. Reported-by: Jaime Casanova, via sqlsmith Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJGNTeO93u-5APMga6WH41eTZ3Uee9f3s8dCpA-GSSqNs1b=Ug@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 12
* Use CP_SMALL_TLIST for hash aggregateTomas Vondra2020-05-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 1f39bce021 added disk-based hash aggregation, which may spill incoming tuples to disk. It however did not request projection to make the tuples as narrow as possible, which may mean having to spill much more data than necessary (increasing I/O, pushing other stuff from page cache, etc.). This adds CP_SMALL_TLIST in places that may use hash aggregation - we do that only for AGG_HASHED. It's unnecessary for AGG_SORTED, because that either uses explicit Sort (which already does projection) or pre-sorted input (which does not need spilling to disk). Author: Tomas Vondra Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200519151202.u2p2gpiawoaznsv2%40development
* llvmjit: Fix building against LLVM 11 by removing unnecessary include.Andres Freund2020-05-28
| | | | | | | | | LLVM has removed this header, in the branch that will become llvm 11. But as it turns out we didn't actually need it, so just remove it. Author: Jesse Zhang <sbjesse@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGf+fX7bvtP0YXMu7pOsu_NwhxW6dArTkxb=jt7M2-UJkyJ_3g@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 11, where JIT support using llvm was introduced.
* Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to the repeat() functionJoe Conway2020-05-28
| | | | | | | | | | | The repeat() function loops for potentially a long time without ever checking for interrupts. This prevents, for example, a query cancel from interrupting until the work is all done. Fix by inserting a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() into the loop. Backpatch to all supported versions. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8692553c-7fe8-17d9-cbc1-7cddb758f4c6%40joeconway.com
* Add missing error code to "cannot attach index ..." error.Heikki Linnakangas2020-05-28
| | | | | | | | ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE was used in an ereport with the same message but different errdetail a few lines earlier, so use that here as well. Backpatch-through: 11
* Fix some mentions to memory units in postgresql.conf.sampleMichael Paquier2020-05-28
| | | | | | | | | The default unit for max_slot_wal_keep_size is megabytes. While on it, also change temp_file_limit to use a more consistent wording. Reported-by: Jeff Janes, Fujii Masao Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1wWZhhjpwRFKJ9waQGxxROeC0P6UqPvb90fAaGz7dhoHA@mail.gmail.com
* Avoid fragmentation of logical tapes when writing concurrently.Jeff Davis2020-05-26
| | | | | | | | | | Disk-based HashAgg relies on writing to multiple tapes concurrently. Avoid fragmentation of the tapes' blocks by preallocating many blocks for a tape at once. No file operations are performed during preallocation; only the block numbers are reserved. Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200519151202.u2p2gpiawoaznsv2%40development
* Add lcov exclusion markers to jsonpath scannerPeter Eisentraut2020-05-26
| | | | | This was done for all scanners in 421167362242ce1fb46d6d720798787e7cd65aad but not added to the new one.
* gss: add missing references to hostgssenc and hostnogssencBruce Momjian2020-05-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | These were missed when these were added to pg_hba.conf in PG 12; updates docs and pg_hba.conf.sample. Reported-by: Arthur Nascimento Bug: 16380 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200421182736.GG19613@momjian.us Backpatch-through: 12
* Reconcile nodes/*funcs.c.Noah Misch2020-05-25
| | | | | The stmt_len changes do not affect behavior. LimitPath has no other support functions, so that part changes only debugging output.
* Add missing invocations to object access hooksMichael Paquier2020-05-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The following commands have been missing calls to object access hooks InvokeObjectPost{Create|Alter}Hook normally applied to all commands: - ALTER RULE RENAME TO - ALTER USER MAPPING - CREATE ACCESS METHOD - CREATE STATISTICS Thanks also to Robert Haas for the discussion. Author: Mark Dilger Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/435CD295-F409-44E0-91EC-DF32C7AFCD76@enterprisedb.com
* Fix two typos in a commentAlvaro Herrera2020-05-22
| | | | They were introduced in 898e5e3290a7; backpatch to 12.
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-08-04 06:39:02 +0000