aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Fix race condition where heap_delete() fails to pin VM page.Jeff Davis2022-09-22
| | | | | | | | | | Similar to 5f12bc94dc, the code must re-check PageIsAllVisible() after buffer lock is re-acquired. Backpatching to the same version, 12. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEP4nAw9jYQDKd_5Y+-s2E4YiUJq1vqiikFjYGpLShtp-K3gag@mail.gmail.com Reported-by: Robins Tharakan Reviewed-by: Robins Tharakan Backpatch-through: 12
* Fix thinko in comment.Etsuro Fujita2022-09-22
| | | | | | | This comment has been wrong since its introduction in commit 0d5f05cde; backpatch to v12 where that came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK14VGf-xQjGQN4o1QyAbXAaxugU5%3DqfcmTDh1iufUDnV_w%40mail.gmail.com
* Suppress more variable-set-but-not-used warnings from clang 15.Tom Lane2022-09-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Mop up assorted set-but-not-used warnings in the back branches. This includes back-patching relevant fixes from commit 152c9f7b8 the rest of the way, but there are also several cases that did not appear in HEAD. Some of those we'd fixed in a retail way but not back-patched, and others I think just got rewritten out of existence during nearby refactoring. While here, also back-patch b1980f6d0 (PL/Tcl: Fix compiler warnings with Tcl 8.6) into 9.2, so that that branch compiles warning-free with modern Tcl. Per project policy, this is a candidate for back-patching into out-of-support branches: it suppresses annoying compiler warnings but changes no behavior. Hence, back-patch all the way to 9.2. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/514615.1663615243@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Suppress variable-set-but-not-used warnings from clang 15.Tom Lane2022-09-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | clang 15+ will issue a set-but-not-used warning when the only use of a variable is in autoincrements (e.g., "foo++;"). That's perfectly sensible, but it detects a few more cases that we'd not noticed before. Silence the warnings with our usual methods, such as PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY, or in one case by actually removing a useless variable. One thing that we can't nicely get rid of is that with %pure-parser, Bison emits "yynerrs" as a local variable that falls foul of this warning. To silence those, I inserted "(void) yynerrs;" in the top-level productions of affected grammars. Per recently-established project policy, this is a candidate for back-patching into out-of-support branches: it suppresses annoying compiler warnings but changes no behavior. Hence, back-patch to 9.5, which is as far as these patches go without issues. (A preliminary check shows that the prior branches need some other set-but-not-used cleanups too, so I'll leave them for another day.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/514615.1663615243@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix incorrect variable types for origin IDs in decode.cMichael Paquier2022-09-20
| | | | | | | | These variables used XLogRecPtr instead of RepOriginId. Author: Masahiko Sawada Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBm-vNyBSXGp4bmJGvhr=S-EGc5q1dtV70cFTcJvLhC=Q@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 14
* Future-proof the recursion inside ExecShutdownNode().Tom Lane2022-09-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The API contract for planstate_tree_walker() callbacks is that they take a PlanState pointer and a context pointer. Somebody figured they could save a couple lines of code by ignoring that, and passing ExecShutdownNode itself as the walker even though it has but one argument. Somewhat remarkably, we've gotten away with that so far. However, it seems clear that the upcoming C2x standard means to forbid such cases, and compilers that actively break such code likely won't be far behind. So spend the extra few lines of code to do it honestly with a separate walker function. In HEAD, we might as well go further and remove ExecShutdownNode's useless return value. I left that as-is in back branches though, to forestall complaints about ABI breakage. Back-patch, with the thought that this might become of practical importance before our stable branches are all out of service. It doesn't seem to be fixing any live bug on any currently known platform, however. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/208054.1663534665@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Don't reference out-of-bounds array elements in brin_minmax_multi.cDavid Rowley2022-09-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The primary fix here is to fix has_matching_range() so it does not reference ranges->values[-1] when nranges == 0. Similar problems existed in AssertCheckRanges() too. It does not look like any of these problems could lead to a crash as the array in question is at the end of the Ranges struct, and values[-1] is memory that belongs to other fields in the struct. However, let's get rid of these rather unsafe coding practices. In passing, I (David) adjusted some comments to try to make it more clear what some of the fields are for in the Ranges struct. I had to study the code to find out what nsorted was for as I couldn't tell from the comments. Author: Ranier Vilela Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAqJQzPitufX-jR=YUbJafpCDAKUnwgdbX_MzSc93wuvdw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 14, where multi-range brin was added.
* Fix NaN comparison in circle_same testDaniel Gustafsson2022-09-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit c4c340088 changed geometric operators to use float4 and float8 functions, and handle NaN's in a better way. The circle sameness test had a typo in the code which resulted in all comparisons with the left circle having a NaN radius considered same. postgres=# select '<(0,0),NaN>'::circle ~= '<(0,0),1>'::circle; ?column? ---------- t (1 row) This fixes the sameness test to consider the radius of both the left and right circle. Backpatch to v12 where this was introduced. Author: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAo8dK=yctg2ZzjJuzV4zgOPBxRU5+Kb+yatFiddtQk6Rw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: v12
* Choose FK name correctly during partition attachmentAlvaro Herrera2022-09-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | During ALTER TABLE ATTACH PARTITION, if the name of a parent's foreign key constraint is already used on the partition, the code tries to choose another one before the FK attributes list has been populated, so the resulting constraint name was "<relname>__fkey" instead of "<relname>_<attrs>_fkey". Repair, and add a test case. Backpatch to 12. In 11, the code to attach a partition was not smart enough to cope with conflicting constraint names, so the problem doesn't exist there. Author: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220901184156.738ebee5@karst
* Fix some possibly latent bugs in slab.cDavid Rowley2022-09-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Primarily, this fixes an incorrect calculation in SlabCheck which was looking in the wrong byte for the sentinel check. The reason that we've never noticed this before in the form of a failing sentinel check is because the pre-check to this always fails because all current core users of slab contexts have a chunk size which is already MAXALIGNed, therefore there's never any space for the sentinel byte. It is possible that an extension needs to use a slab context and if they do with a chunk size that's not MAXALIGNed, then they'll likely get errors about overwritten sentinel bytes. Additionally, this patch changes various calculations which are being done based on the sizeof(SlabBlock). Currently, sizeof(SlabBlock) is a multiple of 8, therefore sizeof(SlabBlock) is the same as MAXALIGN(sizeof(SlabBlock)), however, if we were to ever have to add any fields to that struct as part of a bug fix, then SlabAlloc could end up returning a non-MAXALIGNed pointer. To be safe, let's ensure we always MAXALIGN sizeof(SlabBlock) before using it in any calculations. This patch has already been applied to master in d5ee4db0e. Diagnosed-by: Tomas Vondra, Tom Lane Author: Tomas Vondra, David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1%2B1JyW5TiL%3DyV-3Uq1CrfnTyn0Xrk5uArt31Z%3D8rgPhXQ%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 10
* Prevent long-term memory leakage in autovacuum launcher.Tom Lane2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get_database_list() failed to restore the caller's memory context, instead leaving current context set to TopMemoryContext which is how CommitTransactionCommand() leaves it. The callers both think they are using short-lived contexts, for the express purpose of not having to worry about cleaning up individual allocations. The net effect therefore is that supposedly short-lived allocations could accumulate indefinitely in the launcher's TopMemoryContext. Although this has been broken for a long time, it seems we didn't have any obvious memory leak here until v15's rearrangement of the stats logic. I (tgl) am not entirely convinced that there's no other leak at all, though, and we're surely at risk of adding one in future back-patched fixes. So back-patch to all supported branches, even though this may be only a latent bug in pre-v15. Reid Thompson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/972a4e12b68b0f96db514777a150ceef7dcd2e0f.camel@crunchydata.com
* In the Snowball dictionary, don't try to stem excessively-long words.Tom Lane2022-08-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the input word exceeds 1000 bytes, don't pass it to the stemmer; just return it as-is after case folding. Such an input is surely not a word in any human language, so whatever the stemmer might do to it would be pretty dubious in the first place. Adding this restriction protects us against a known recursion-to-stack-overflow problem in the Turkish stemmer, and it seems like good insurance against any other safety or performance issues that may exist in the Snowball stemmers. (I note, for example, that they contain no CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS calls, so we really don't want them running for a long time.) The threshold of 1000 bytes is arbitrary. An alternative definition could have been to treat such words as stopwords, but that seems like a bigger break from the old behavior. Per report from Egor Chindyaskin and Alexander Lakhin. Thanks to Olly Betts for the recommendation to fix it this way. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1661334672.728714027@f473.i.mail.ru
* Prevent WAL corruption after a standby promotion.Robert Haas2022-08-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a PostgreSQL instance performing archive recovery but not using standby mode is promoted, and the last WAL segment that it attempted to read ended in a partial record, the previous code would create invalid WAL on the new timeline. The WAL from the previously timeline would be copied to the new timeline up until the end of the last valid record, but instead of beginning to write WAL at immediately afterwards, the promoted server would write an overwrite contrecord at the beginning of the next segment. The end of the previous segment would be left as all-zeroes, resulting in failures if anything tried to read WAL from that file. The root of the issue is that ReadRecord() decides whether to set abortedRecPtr and missingContrecPtr based on the value of StandbyMode, but ReadRecord() switches to a new timeline based on the value of ArchiveRecoveryRequested. We shouldn't try to write an overwrite contrecord if we're switching to a new timeline, so change the test in ReadRecod() to check ArchiveRecoveryRequested instead. Code fix by Dilip Kumar. Comments by me incorporating suggested language from Álvaro Herrera. Further review from Kyotaro Horiguchi and Sami Imseih. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-t7umki=PK8dT1tcPV=mOUe2vNhHML6b3T7W7qqvvajjg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/FB0DEA0B-E14E-43A0-811F-C1AE93D00FF3%40amazon.com
* Fix typo in comment.Etsuro Fujita2022-08-26
|
* Defend against stack overrun in a few more places.Tom Lane2022-08-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SplitToVariants() in the ispell code, lseg_inside_poly() in geo_ops.c, and regex_selectivity_sub() in selectivity estimation could recurse until stack overflow; fix by adding check_stack_depth() calls. So could next() in the regex compiler, but that case is better fixed by converting its tail recursion to a loop. (We probably get better code that way too, since next() can now be inlined into its sole caller.) There remains a reachable stack overrun in the Turkish stemmer, but we'll need some advice from the Snowball people about how to fix that. Per report from Egor Chindyaskin and Alexander Lakhin. These mistakes are old, so back-patch to all supported branches. Richard Guo and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1661334672.728714027@f473.i.mail.ru
* Doc: prefer sysctl to /proc/sys in docs and comments.Tom Lane2022-08-23
| | | | | | | | | sysctl is more portable than Linux's /proc/sys file tree, and often easier to use too. That's why most of our docs refer to sysctl when talking about how to adjust kernel parameters. Bring the few stragglers into line. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/361175.1661187463@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS while decoding changes.Amit Kapila2022-08-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | While decoding changes in a loop, if we skip all the changes there is no CFI making the loop uninterruptible. Reported-by: Whale Song and Andrey Borodin Bug: 17580 Author: Masahiko Sawada Reviwed-by: Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 10 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17580-849c1d5b6d7eb422@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B319ECD6-9A28-4CDF-A8F4-3591E0BF2369@yandex-team.ru
* Fix subtly-incorrect matching of parent and child partitioned indexes.Tom Lane2022-08-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When creating a partitioned index, DefineIndex tries to identify any existing indexes on the partitions that match the partitioned index, so that it can absorb those as child indexes instead of building new ones. Part of the matching is to compare IndexInfo structs --- but that wasn't done quite right. We're comparing the IndexInfo built within DefineIndex itself to one made from existing catalog contents by BuildIndexInfo. Notably, while BuildIndexInfo will run index expressions and predicates through expression preprocessing, that has not happened to DefineIndex's struct. The result is failure to match and subsequent creation of duplicate indexes. The easiest and most bulletproof fix is to build a new IndexInfo using BuildIndexInfo, thereby guaranteeing that the processing done is identical. While here, let's also extract the opfamily and collation data from the new partitioned index, removing ad-hoc logic that duplicated knowledge about how those are constructed. Per report from Christophe Pettus. Back-patch to v11 where we invented partitioned indexes. Richard Guo and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8864BFAA-81FD-4BF9-8E06-7DEB8D4164ED@thebuild.com
* Fix assert in logicalmsg_descTomas Vondra2022-08-17
| | | | | | | | | | | The assert, introduced by 9f1cf97bb5, is intended to check if the prefix is terminated by a \0 byte, but it has two flaws. Firstly, prefix_size includes the \0 byte, so prefix[prefix_size] points to the byte after the null byte. Secondly, the check ensures the byte is not equal \0, while it should be checking the opposite. Backpatch-through: 14 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b99b6101-2f14-3796-3dfa-4a6cd7d4326d@enterprisedb.com
* Fix replica identity check for a partitioned table.Amit Kapila2022-08-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current publisher code checks if UPDATE or DELETE can be executed with the replica identity of the table even if it's a partitioned table. We can skip checking the replica identity for partitioned tables because the operations are actually performed on the leaf partitions (not the partitioned table). Reported-by: Brad Nicholson Author: Hou Zhijie Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 13 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMMnM%3D8i5DohH%3DYKzV0_wYuYSYvuOJoL9F5nzXTc%2ByzsG1f6rg%40mail.gmail.com
* Fix outdated --help message for postgres -fMichael Paquier2022-08-15
| | | | | | | | | | This option switch supports a total of 8 values, as told by set_plan_disabling_options() and the documentation, but this was not reflected in the output generated by --help. Author: Junwang Zhao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEG8a3+pT3cWzyjzKs184L1XMNm8NDnoJLiSjAYSO7XqpRh_vA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 10
* Preserve memory context of VarStringSortSupport buffers.Tom Lane2022-08-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When enlarging the work buffers of a VarStringSortSupport object, varstrfastcmp_locale was careful to keep them in the ssup_cxt memory context; but varstr_abbrev_convert just used palloc(). The latter creates a hazard that the buffers could be freed out from under the VarStringSortSupport object, resulting in stomping on whatever gets allocated in that memory later. In practice, because we only use this code for ICU collations (cf. 3df9c374e), the problem is confined to use of ICU collations. I believe it may have been unreachable before the introduction of incremental sort, too, as traditional sorting usually just uses one context for the duration of the sort. We could fix this by making the broken stanzas in varstr_abbrev_convert match the non-broken ones in varstrfastcmp_locale. However, it seems like a better idea to dodge the issue altogether by replacing the pfree-and-allocate-anew coding with repalloc, which automatically preserves the chunk's memory context. This fix does add a few cycles because repalloc will copy the chunk's content, which the existing coding assumes is useless. However, we don't expect that these buffer enlargement operations are performance-critical. Besides that, it's far from obvious that copying the buffer contents isn't required, since these stanzas make no effort to mark the buffers invalid by resetting last_returned, cache_blob, etc. That seems to be safe upon examination, but it's fragile and could easily get broken in future, which wouldn't get revealed in testing with short-to-moderate-size strings. Per bug #17584 from James Inform. Whether or not the issue is reachable in the older branches, this code has been broken on its own terms from its introduction, so patch all the way back. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17584-95c79b4a7d771f44@postgresql.org
* Avoid misbehavior when hash_table_bytes < bucket_size.Tom Lane2022-08-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's possible to reach this case when work_mem is very small and tupsize is (relatively) very large. In that case ExecChooseHashTableSize would get an assertion failure, or with asserts off it'd compute nbuckets = 0, which'd likely cause misbehavior later (I've not checked). To fix, clamp the number of buckets to be at least 1. This is due to faulty conversion of old my_log2() coding in 28d936031. Back-patch to v13, as that was. Zhang Mingli Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/beb64ca0-91e2-44ac-bf4a-7ea36275ec02@Spark
* Catch stack overflow when recursing in transformFromClauseItem().Tom Lane2022-08-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Most parts of the parser can expect that the stack overflow check in transformExprRecurse() will trigger before things get desperate. However, transformFromClauseItem() can recurse directly to self without having analyzed any expressions, so it's possible to drive it to a stack-overrun crash. Add a check to prevent that. Per bug #17583 from Egor Chindyaskin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Richard Guo Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17583-33be55b9f981f75c@postgresql.org
* Add missing fields to _outConstraint()Peter Eisentraut2022-08-13
| | | | | | | | As of 897795240cfaaed724af2f53ed2c50c9862f951f, check constraints can be declared invalid. But that patch didn't update _outConstraint() to also show the relevant struct fields (which were only applicable to foreign keys before that). This currently only affects debugging output, so no impact in practice.
* Fix _outConstraint() for "identity" constraintsPeter Eisentraut2022-08-12
| | | | | | | | | The set of fields printed by _outConstraint() in the CONSTR_IDENTITY case didn't match the set of fields actually used in that case. (The code was probably uncarefully copied from the CONSTR_DEFAULT case.) Fix that by using the right set of fields. Since there is no read support for this node type, this is really just for debugging output right now, so it doesn't affect anything important.
* Fix catalog lookup with the wrong snapshot during logical decoding.Amit Kapila2022-08-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, we relied on HEAP2_NEW_CID records and XACT_INVALIDATION records to know if the transaction has modified the catalog, and that information is not serialized to snapshot. Therefore, after the restart, if the logical decoding decodes only the commit record of the transaction that has actually modified a catalog, we will miss adding its XID to the snapshot. Thus, we will end up looking at catalogs with the wrong snapshot. To fix this problem, this changes the snapshot builder so that it remembers the last-running-xacts list of the decoded RUNNING_XACTS record after restoring the previously serialized snapshot. Then, we mark the transaction as containing catalog changes if it's in the list of initial running transactions and its commit record has XACT_XINFO_HAS_INVALS. To avoid ABI breakage, we store the array of the initial running transactions in the static variables InitialRunningXacts and NInitialRunningXacts, instead of storing those in SnapBuild or ReorderBuffer. This approach has a false positive; we could end up adding the transaction that didn't change catalog to the snapshot since we cannot distinguish whether the transaction has catalog changes only by checking the COMMIT record. It doesn't have the information on which (sub) transaction has catalog changes, and XACT_XINFO_HAS_INVALS doesn't necessarily indicate that the transaction has catalog change. But that won't be a problem since we use snapshot built during decoding only to read system catalogs. On the master branch, we took a more future-proof approach by writing catalog modifying transactions to the serialized snapshot which avoids the above false positive. But we cannot backpatch it because of a change in the SnapBuild. Reported-by: Mike Oh Author: Masahiko Sawada Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Shi yu, Takamichi Osumi, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Bertrand Drouvot, Ahsan Hadi Backpatch-through: 10 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/81D0D8B0-E7C4-4999-B616-1E5004DBDCD2%40amazon.com
* Fix handling of R/W expanded datums that are passed to SQL functions.Tom Lane2022-08-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | fmgr_sql must make expanded-datum arguments read-only, because it's possible that the function body will pass the argument to more than one callee function. If one of those functions takes the datum's R/W property as license to scribble on it, then later callees will see an unexpected value, leading to wrong answers. From a performance standpoint, it'd be nice to skip this in the common case that the argument value is passed to only one callee. However, detecting that seems fairly hard, and certainly not something that I care to attempt in a back-patched bug fix. Per report from Adam Mackler. This has been broken since we invented expanded datums, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/WScDU5qfoZ7PB2gXwNqwGGgDPmWzz08VdydcPFLhOwUKZcdWbblbo-0Lku-qhuEiZoXJ82jpiQU4hOjOcrevYEDeoAvz6nR0IU4IHhXnaCA=@mackler.email Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/187436.1660143060@sss.pgh.pa.us
* In extensions, don't replace objects not belonging to the extension.Tom Lane2022-08-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, if an extension script did CREATE OR REPLACE and there was an existing object not belonging to the extension, it would overwrite the object and adopt it into the extension. This is problematic, first because the overwrite is probably unintentional, and second because we didn't change the object's ownership. Thus a hostile user could create an object in advance of an expected CREATE EXTENSION command, and would then have ownership rights on an extension object, which could be modified for trojan-horse-type attacks. Hence, forbid CREATE OR REPLACE of an existing object unless it already belongs to the extension. (Note that we've always forbidden replacing an object that belongs to some other extension; only the behavior for previously-free-standing objects changes here.) For the same reason, also fail CREATE IF NOT EXISTS when there is an existing object that doesn't belong to the extension. Our thanks to Sven Klemm for reporting this problem. Security: CVE-2022-2625
* Translation updatesAlvaro Herrera2022-08-08
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: ssh://git@git.postgresql.org/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 20d70fc4a9763d5d31afc422be0be0feb0fb0363
* Partially undo commit 94da73281.Tom Lane2022-08-05
| | | | | | | | On closer inspection, mcv.c isn't as broken for ScalarArrayOpExpr as I thought. The Var-on-right issue is real enough, but actually it does cope fine with a NULL array constant --- I was misled by an XXX comment suggesting it didn't. Undo that part of the code change, and replace the XXX comment with something less misleading.
* Fix handling of bare boolean expressions in mcv_get_match_bitmap.Tom Lane2022-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since v14, the extended stats machinery will try to estimate for otherwise-unsupported boolean expressions if they match an expression available from an extended stats object. mcv.c did not get the memo about this, and would spit up with "unknown clause type". Fortunately the case is easy to handle, since we can expect the expression yields boolean. While here, replace some not-terribly-on-point assertions with simpler runtime tests for lookup failure. That seems appropriate so that we get an elog not a crash if we somehow get to the new it-should-be-a-bool-expression code with a subexpression that doesn't match any stats column. Per report from Danny Shemesh. Thanks to Justin Pryzby for preliminary investigation. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFZC=QqD6=27wQPOW1pbRa98KPyuyn+7cL_Ay_Ck-roZV84vHg@mail.gmail.com
* Fix non-bulletproof ScalarArrayOpExpr code for extended statistics.Tom Lane2022-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | statext_is_compatible_clause_internal() checked that the arguments of a ScalarArrayOpExpr are one Var and one Const, but it would allow cases where the Const was on the left. Subsequent uses of the clause are not expecting that and would suffer assertion failures or core dumps. mcv.c also had not bothered to cope with the case of a NULL array constant, which seems really unacceptably sloppy of somebody. (Although our tools failed us there too, since AFAIK neither Coverity nor any compiler warned of the obvious use-of-uninitialized-variable condition.) It seems best to handle that by having statext_is_compatible_clause_internal() reject it. Noted while fixing bug #17570. Back-patch to v13 where the extended stats code grew some awareness of ScalarArrayOpExpr.
* Fix incorrect permissions-checking code for extended statistics.Tom Lane2022-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit a4d75c86b improved the extended-stats logic to allow extended stats to be collected on expressions not just bare Vars. To apply such stats, we first verify that the user has permissions to read all columns used in the stats. (If not, the query will likely fail at runtime, but the planner ought not do so.) That had to get extended to check permissions of columns appearing within such expressions, but the code for that was completely wrong: it applied pull_varattnos to the wrong pointer, leading to "unrecognized node type" failures. Furthermore, although you couldn't get to this because of that bug, it failed to account for the attnum offset applied by pull_varattnos. This escaped recognition so far because the code in question is not reached when the user has whole-table SELECT privilege (which is the common case), and because only subexpressions not specially handled by statext_is_compatible_clause_internal() are at risk. I think a large part of the reason for this bug is under-documentation of what statext_is_compatible_clause() is doing and what its arguments are, so do some work on the comments to try to improve that. Per bug #17570 from Alexander Kozhemyakin. Patch by Richard Guo; comments and other cosmetic improvements by me. (Thanks also to Japin Li for diagnosis.) Back-patch to v14 where the bug came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17570-f2f2e0f4bccf0965@postgresql.org
* BRIN: mask BRIN_EVACUATE_PAGE for WAL consistency checkingAlvaro Herrera2022-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | That bit is unlogged and therefore it's wrong to consider it in WAL page comparison. Add a test that tickles the case, as branch testing technology allows. This has been a problem ever since wal consistency checking was introduced (commit a507b86900f6 for pg10), so backpatch to all supported branches. Author: 王海洋 (Haiyang Wang) <wanghaiyang.001@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACciXAD2UvLMOhc4jX9VvOKt7DtYLr3OYRBhvOZ-jRxtzc_7Jg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACciXADOfErX9Bx0nzE_SkdfXr6Bbpo5R=v_B6MUTEYW4ya+cg@mail.gmail.com
* Add HINT for restartpoint race with KeepFileRestoredFromArchive().Noah Misch2022-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | The five commits ending at cc2c7d65fc27e877c9f407587b0b92d46cd6dd16 closed this race condition for v15+. For v14 through v10, add a HINT to discourage studying the cosmetic problem. Reviewed by Kyotaro Horiguchi and David Steele. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220731061747.GA3692882@rfd.leadboat.com
* Fix ENABLE/DISABLE TRIGGER to handle recursion correctlyAlvaro Herrera2022-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Using ATSimpleRecursion() in ATPrepCmd() to do so as bbb927b4db9b did is not correct, because ATPrepCmd() can't distinguish between triggers that may be cloned and those that may not, so would wrongly try to recurse for the latter category of triggers. So this commit restores the code in EnableDisableTrigger() that 86f575948c77 had added to do the recursion, which would do it only for triggers that may be cloned, that is, row-level triggers. This also changes tablecmds.c such that ATExecCmd() is able to pass the value of ONLY flag down to EnableDisableTrigger() using its new 'recurse' parameter. This also fixes what seems like an oversight of 86f575948c77 that the recursion to partition triggers would only occur if EnableDisableTrigger() had actually changed the trigger. It is more apt to recurse to inspect partition triggers even if the parent's trigger didn't need to be changed: only then can we be certain that all descendants share the same state afterwards. Backpatch all the way back to 11, like bbb927b4db9b. Care is taken not to break ABI compatibility (and that no catversion bump is needed.) Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqG-cZT3XzGAnEgZQLoQbyfJApVwOTQaCaas1mhpf+4V5A@mail.gmail.com
* Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in ExecInsert's speculative insertion loop.Tom Lane2022-08-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Ordinarily the functions called in this loop ought to have plenty of CFIs themselves; but we've now seen a case where no such CFI is reached, making the loop uninterruptible. Even though that's from a recently-introduced bug, it seems prudent to install a CFI at the loop level in all branches. Per discussion of bug #17558 from Andrew Kesper (an actual fix for that bug will follow). Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17558-3f6599ffcf52fd4a@postgresql.org
* Fix incorrect tests for SRFs in relation_can_be_sorted_early().Tom Lane2022-08-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit fac1b470a thought we could check for set-returning functions by testing only the top-level node in an expression tree. This is wrong in itself, and to make matters worse it encouraged others to make the same mistake, by exporting tlist.c's special-purpose IS_SRF_CALL() as a widely-visible macro. I can't find any evidence that anyone's taken the bait, but it was only a matter of time. Use expression_returns_set() instead, and stuff the IS_SRF_CALL() genie back in its bottle, this time with a warning label. I also added a couple of cross-reference comments. After a fair amount of fooling around, I've despaired of making a robust test case that exposes the bug reliably, so no test case here. (Note that the test case added by fac1b470a is itself broken, in that it doesn't notice if you remove the code change. The repro given by the bug submitter currently doesn't fail either in v15 or HEAD, though I suspect that may indicate an unrelated bug.) Per bug #17564 from Martijn van Oosterhout. Back-patch to v13, as the faulty patch was. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17564-c7472c2f90ef2da3@postgresql.org
* Check maximum number of columns in function RTEs, too.Tom Lane2022-08-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I thought commit fd96d14d9 had plugged all the holes of this sort, but no, function RTEs could produce oversize tuples too, either via long coldeflists or just from multiple functions in one RTE. (I'm pretty sure the other variants of base RTEs aren't a problem, because they ultimately refer to either a table or a sub-SELECT, whose widths are enforced elsewhere. But we explicitly allow join RTEs to be overwidth, as long as you don't try to form their tuple result.) Per further discussion of bug #17561. As before, patch all branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17561-80350151b9ad2ad4@postgresql.org
* Fix trim_array() for zero-dimensional array argument.Tom Lane2022-07-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The code tried to access ARR_DIMS(v)[0] and ARR_LBOUND(v)[0] whether or not those values exist. This made the range check on the "n" argument unstable --- it might or might not fail, and if it did it would report garbage for the allowed upper limit. These bogus accesses would probably annoy Valgrind, and if you were very unlucky even lead to SIGSEGV. Report and fix by Martin Kalcher. Back-patch to v14 where this function was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/baaeb413-b8a8-4656-5757-ef347e5ec11f@aboutsource.net
* In transformRowExpr(), check for too many columns in the row.Tom Lane2022-07-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A RowExpr with more than MaxTupleAttributeNumber columns would fail at execution anyway, since we cannot form a tuple datum with more than that many columns. While heap_form_tuple() has a check for too many columns, it emerges that there are some intermediate bits of code that don't check and can be driven to failure with sufficiently many columns. Checking this at parse time seems like the most appropriate place to install a defense, since we already check SELECT list length there. While at it, make the SELECT-list-length error use the same errcode (TOO_MANY_COLUMNS) as heap_form_tuple does, rather than the generic PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED. Per bug #17561 from Egor Chindyaskin. The given test case crashes in all supported branches (and probably a lot further back), so patch all. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17561-80350151b9ad2ad4@postgresql.org
* Fix replay of create database records on standbyAlvaro Herrera2022-07-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Crash recovery on standby may encounter missing directories when replaying database-creation WAL records. Prior to this patch, the standby would fail to recover in such a case; however, the directories could be legitimately missing. Consider the following sequence of commands: CREATE DATABASE DROP DATABASE DROP TABLESPACE If, after replaying the last WAL record and removing the tablespace directory, the standby crashes and has to replay the create database record again, crash recovery must be able to continue. A fix for this problem was already attempted in 49d9cfc68bf4, but it was reverted because of design issues. This new version is based on Robert Haas' proposal: any missing tablespaces are created during recovery before reaching consistency. Tablespaces are created as real directories, and should be deleted by later replay. CheckRecoveryConsistency ensures they have disappeared. The problems detected by this new code are reported as PANIC, except when allow_in_place_tablespaces is set to ON, in which case they are WARNING. Apart from making tests possible, this gives users an escape hatch in case things don't go as planned. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Author: Asim R Praveen <apraveen@pivotal.io> Author: Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com> (older versions) Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> (older versions) Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Diagnosed-by: Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEET0ZGx9AvioViLf7nbR_8tH9-=27DN5xWJ2P9-ROH16e4JUA@mail.gmail.com
* Allow "in place" tablespaces.Alvaro Herrera2022-07-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a backpatch to branches 10-14 of the following commits: 7170f2159fb2 Allow "in place" tablespaces. c6f2f01611d4 Fix pg_basebackup with in-place tablespaces. f6f0db4d6240 Fix pg_tablespace_location() with in-place tablespaces 7a7cd84893e0 doc: Remove mention to in-place tablespaces for pg_tablespace_location() 5344723755bd Remove unnecessary Windows-specific basebackup code. In-place tablespaces were introduced as a testing helper mechanism, but they are going to be used for a bugfix in WAL replay to be backpatched to all stable branches. I (Álvaro) had to adjust some code to account for lack of get_dirent_type() in branches prior to 14. Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Author: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220722081858.omhn2in5zt3g4nek@alvherre.pgsql
* Force immediate commit after CREATE DATABASE etc in extended protocol.Tom Lane2022-07-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We have a few commands that "can't run in a transaction block", meaning that if they complete their processing but then we fail to COMMIT, we'll be left with inconsistent on-disk state. However, the existing defenses for this are only watertight for simple query protocol. In extended protocol, we didn't commit until receiving a Sync message. Since the client is allowed to issue another command instead of Sync, we're in trouble if that command fails or is an explicit ROLLBACK. In any case, sitting in an inconsistent state while waiting for a client message that might not come seems pretty risky. This case wasn't reachable via libpq before we introduced pipeline mode, but it's always been an intended aspect of extended query protocol, and likely there are other clients that could reach it before. To fix, set a flag in PreventInTransactionBlock that tells exec_execute_message to force an immediate commit. This seems to be the approach that does least damage to existing working cases while still preventing the undesirable outcomes. While here, add some documentation to protocol.sgml that explicitly says how to use pipelining. That's latent in the existing docs if you know what to look for, but it's better to spell it out; and it provides a place to document this new behavior. Per bug #17434 from Yugo Nagata. It's been wrong for ages, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17434-d9f7a064ce2a88a3@postgresql.org
* Fix ReadRecentBuffer for local buffers.Heikki Linnakangas2022-07-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It incorrectly used GetBufferDescriptor instead of GetLocalBufferDescriptor, causing it to not find the correct buffer in most cases, and performing an out-of-bounds memory read in the corner case that temp_buffers > shared_buffers. It also bumped the usage-count on the buffer, even if it was previously pinned. That won't lead to crashes or incorrect results, but it's different from what the shared-buffer case does, and different from the usual code in LocalBufferAlloc. Fix that too, and make the code ordering match LocalBufferAlloc() more closely, so that it's easier to verify that it's doing the same thing. Currently, ReadRecentBuffer() is only used with non-temp relations, in WAL redo, so the broken code is currently dead code. However, it could be used by extensions. Backpatch-through: 14 Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2d74b46f-27c9-fb31-7f99-327a87184cc0%40iki.fi Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro, Zhang Mingli, Richard Guo
* Fix ruleutils issues with dropped cols in functions-returning-composite.Tom Lane2022-07-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Due to lack of concern for the case in the dependency code, it's possible to drop a column of a composite type even though stored queries have references to the dropped column via functions-in-FROM that return the composite type. There are "soft" references, namely FROM-clause aliases for such columns, and "hard" references, that is actual Vars referring to them. The right fix for hard references is to add dependencies preventing the drop; something we've known for many years and not done (and this commit still doesn't address it). A "soft" reference shouldn't prevent a drop though. We've been around on this before (cf. 9b35ddce9, 2c4debbd0), but nobody had noticed that the current behavior can result in dump/reload failures, because ruleutils.c can print more column aliases than the underlying composite type now has. So we need to rejigger the column-alias-handling code to treat such columns as dropped and not print aliases for them. Rather than writing new code for this, I used expandRTE() which already knows how to figure out which function result columns are dropped. I'd initially thought maybe we could use expandRTE() in all cases, but that fails for EXPLAIN's purposes, because the planner strips a lot of RTE infrastructure that expandRTE() needs. So this patch just uses it for unplanned function RTEs and otherwise does things the old way. If there is a hard reference (Var), then removing the column alias causes us to fail to print the Var, since there's no longer a name to print. Failing seems less desirable than printing a made-up name, so I made it print "?dropped?column?" instead. Per report from Timo Stolz. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5c91267e-3b6d-5795-189c-d15a55d61dbb@nullachtvierzehn.de
* Fix assertion failure and segmentation fault in backup code.Fujii Masao2022-07-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a non-exclusive backup is canceled, do_pg_abort_backup() is called and resets some variables set by pg_backup_start (pg_start_backup in v14 or before). But previously it forgot to reset the session state indicating whether a non-exclusive backup is in progress or not in this session. This issue could cause an assertion failure when the session running BASE_BACKUP is terminated after it executed pg_backup_start and pg_backup_stop (pg_stop_backup in v14 or before). Also it could cause a segmentation fault when pg_backup_stop is called after BASE_BACKUP in the same session is canceled. This commit fixes the issue by making do_pg_abort_backup reset that session state. Back-patch to all supported branches. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Masahiko Sawada, Michael Paquier, Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3374718f-9fbf-a950-6d66-d973e027f44c@oss.nttdata.com
* Prevent BASE_BACKUP in the middle of another backup in the same session.Fujii Masao2022-07-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Multiple non-exclusive backups are able to be run conrrently in different sessions. But, in the same session, only one non-exclusive backup can be run at the same moment. If pg_backup_start (pg_start_backup in v14 or before) is called in the middle of another non-exclusive backup in the same session, an error is thrown. However, previously, in logical replication walsender mode, even if that walsender session had already called pg_backup_start and started a non-exclusive backup, it could execute BASE_BACKUP command and start another non-exclusive backup. Which caused subsequent pg_backup_stop to throw an error because BASE_BACKUP unexpectedly reset the session state marked by pg_backup_start. This commit prevents BASE_BACKUP command in the middle of another non-exclusive backup in the same session. Back-patch to all supported branches. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Masahiko Sawada, Michael Paquier, Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3374718f-9fbf-a950-6d66-d973e027f44c@oss.nttdata.com
* Re-add SPICleanup for ABI compatibility in stable branchPeter Eisentraut2022-07-18
| | | | | | | | This fixes an ABI break introduced by 604651880c71c5106a72529b9ce29eaad0cfab27. Author: Markus Wanner <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/defd749a-8410-841d-1126-21398686d63d@enterprisedb.com
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-08-05 05:40:53 +0000