| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When we create a temporary copy of the old node buffer, in stack, we mustn't
leak that into any of the long-lived data structures. Before this patch,
when we called gistPopItupFromNodeBuffer(), it got added to the array of
"loaded buffers". After gistRelocateBuildBuffersOnSplit() exits, the
pointer added to the loaded buffers array points to garbage. Often that goes
unnotied, because when we go through the array of loaded buffers to unload
them, buffers with a NULL pageBuffer are ignored, which can often happen by
accident even if the pointer points to garbage.
This patch fixes that by marking the temporary copy in stack explicitly as
temporary, and refrain from adding buffers marked as temporary to the array
of loaded buffers.
While we're at it, initialize nodeBuffer->pageBlocknum to InvalidBlockNumber
and improve comments a bit. This isn't strictly necessary, but makes
debugging easier.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It was changed from unreserved to reserved as part of the COLLATION
FOR syntax, but it turns out that type_func_name_keyword is
sufficient.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per recent discussion, the error message for this was actually a trifle
inaccurate, since it said "cannot be cast" which might be incorrect.
Adjust that wording, and add a HINT suggesting that a USING clause might
be needed.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the amount of freespace on page was less than the amount reserved by
fillfactor, the calculation would underflow.
This fixes bug #6643 reported by Tomonari Katsumata.
|
| |
|
|
| |
pgindent and perltidy should clean up the rest.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
We were using memcpy() to copy to a possibly overlapping memory region,
which is a no-no. Use memmove() instead.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have no need for a timeout here really, but some broken products from
Redmond seem to lose FD_READ events occasionally, and waking up and
retrying the recv() is the only known way to work around that. Perhaps
somebody will be motivated to figure out a better answer here; but not I.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 7d88bb73f755f7fb5d847ef2319c21076054fb0e.
That instrumentation has served its purpose.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since we have chosen to report socket EOF and error conditions via the
WL_SOCKET_READABLE flag bit, it's unsafe to wait only for
WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE; the caller would never be notified of the socket
condition, and in some of these implementations WaitLatchOrSocket would
busy-wait until something else happens. Add this restriction to the API
specification, and add Asserts to check that callers don't try to do that.
At some point we might want to consider adjusting the API to relax this
restriction, but until we have an actual use case for waiting on a
write-only socket, it seems premature to design a solution.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Test results from buildfarm members mastodon/narwhal (Windows Server 2003)
make it look like that platform just plain loses FD_READ events
occasionally, and the only reason our previous coding seemed to work was
that it timed out every couple of seconds and retried the whole operation.
Try to verify this by reinserting a finite timeout into the pgstat loop.
This isn't meant to be a permanent patch either, just to confirm or
disprove a theory.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should get rid of the usage of pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket entirely,
and perhaps thereby remove the race condition that's evidently still
present on some versions of Windows. The previous arrangement was a bit
unsafe anyway, since waiting at the recv() would not allow pgstat to notice
postmaster death.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The input should've been validated well before it hits the input function.
Doing so again is a waste of cycles.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the "hot" members of PGPROC were split off to separate PGXACT structs,
many PGPROC fields referred to in comments were moved to PGXACT, but the
comments were neglected in the commit. Mostly this is just a search/replace
of PGPROC with PGXACT, but the way the dummy PGPROC entries are created for
prepared transactions changed more, making some of the comments totally
bogus.
Noah Misch
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
These should have been removed when the BeOS port was removed in
44f90212236bfb6fc1279e95dc8fa315104d964e.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Log main-loop blocking events and the results of inquiry messages.
This is to get some clarity as to what's happening on those Windows
buildfarm members that still don't like the latch-ified stats collector.
This bulks up the postmaster log a tad, so I won't leave it in place for
long.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the tablespace directory is missing entirely, we allow DROP TABLESPACE
to go through, on the grounds that it should be possible to clean up the
catalog entry in such a situation. However, we forgot that the pg_tblspc
symlink might still be there. We should try to remove the symlink too
(but not fail if it's no longer there), since not doing so can lead to
weird behavior subsequently, as per report from Michael Nolan.
There was some discussion of adding dependency links to prevent DROP
TABLESPACE when the catalogs still contain references to the tablespace.
That might be worth doing too, but it's an orthogonal question, and in
any case wouldn't be back-patchable.
Back-patch to 9.0, which is as far back as the logic looks like this.
We could possibly do something similar in 8.x, but given the lack of
reports I'm not sure it's worth the trouble, and anyway the case could
not arise in the form the logic is meant to cover (namely, a post-DROP
transaction rollback having resurrected the pg_tablespace entry after
some or all of the filesystem infrastructure is gone).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit cb2f2873d6b81ad7f0a9733ba738bfac0746fb7b, restoring
the latch-ified stats collector logic. We'll soon see if this works any
better on the Windows buildfarm machines.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make sure WaitLatchOrSocket regards FD_CLOSE as a read-ready condition.
We might want to tweak this further, but it was surely wrong as-is.
Make pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket detach its private event object from the
passed socket before returning. I suspect that failure to do so leads
to race conditions when other code (such as WaitLatchOrSocket) attaches
a different event object to the same socket. Moreover, the existing
coding meant that repeated calls to pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket would
perform ResetEvent on an event actively connected to a socket, which
is rumored to be an unsafe practice; the WSAEventSelect documentation
appears to recommend against this, though it does not say not to do it
in so many words.
Also, uniformly use the coding pattern "WSAEventSelect(s, NULL, 0)" to
detach events from sockets, rather than passing the event in the second
parameter. The WSAEventSelect documentation says that the second parameter
is ignored if the third is 0, so theoretically this should make no
difference. However, elsewhere on the same reference page the use of NULL
in this context is recommended, and I have found suggestions on the net
that some versions of Windows have bugs with a non-NULL second parameter
in this usage.
Some other mostly-cosmetic cleanup, such as using the right one of
WSAGetLastError and GetLastError for reporting errors from these functions.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
rc should be an int here, not a pgsocket. Fairly harmless as long as
pgsocket is an integer type, but nonetheless wrong. Error introduced
in commit 87091cb1f1ed914e2ddca424fa28f94fdf8461d2.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
syslogger was coded to wake up once per second whether there was anything
useful to do or not. As part of our campaign to reduce the server's idle
power consumption, change it to use a latch for waiting. Now, in the
absence of any data to log or any signals to service, it will only wake up
at the programmed logfile rotation times (if any).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When using poll(), EOF on a socket is reported with the POLLHUP not
POLLIN flag (at least on Linux). WaitLatchOrSocket failed to check
this bit, causing it to go into a busy-wait loop if EOF occurs.
We earlier fixed the same mistake in the test for the state of the
postmaster_alive socket, but missed it for the caller-supplied socket.
Fortunately, this error is new in 9.2, since 9.1 only had a select()
based code path not a poll() based one.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
gcc -Wextra/-Wold-style-declaration thinks that "inline" should go
before the function return type.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Correct some comments, order some operations a bit more consistently.
No functional changes.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fixes bug #6635, reported by Akira Kurosawa.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When inserting the downlinks for a split gist page, we used hold the locks
on the child pages until the insertion into the parent - and recursively its
parent if it had to be split too - were all completed. Change that so that
the locks on child pages are released after the insertion in the immediate
parent is done, before recursing further up the tree.
This reduces the number of lwlocks that are held simultaneously. Holding
many locks is bad for concurrency, and in extreme cases you can even hit
the limit of 100 simultaneously held lwlocks in a backend. If you're really
unlucky, you can hit the limit while in a critical section, which brings
down the whole system.
This fixes bug #6629 reported by Tom Forbes. Backpatch to 9.1. The page
splitting code was rewritten in 9.1, and the old code did not have this
problem.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch reverts commit 49340037ee3ab46cb24144a86705e35f272c24d5 and some
follow-on tweaking in pgstat.c. While the basic scheme of latch-ifying the
stats collector seems sound enough, it's failing on most Windows buildfarm
members for unknown reasons, and there's no time left to debug that before
9.2beta1. Better to ship a beta version without this improvement. I hope
to re-revert this once beta1 is out, though.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per a suggestion from Peter Geoghegan, make WaitLatch responsible for
verifying that the WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH bit it returns is truthful (by
testing PostmasterIsAlive). Then simplify its callers, who no longer
need to do that for themselves. Remove weasel wording about falsely-set
result bits from WaitLatch's API contract.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original coding failed to reset ImmediateInterruptOK before returning,
which would potentially allow a subsequent query-cancel interrupt to be
accepted at an unsafe point. This is a really nasty bug since it's so hard
to predict the consequences, but they could be unpleasant.
Also, ensure that signal handlers are serviced before this function
returns, even if the semaphore is already set. This should make the
behavior more like Unix.
Back-patch to all supported versions.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ensure that signal handlers are serviced before this function returns.
This should make the behavior more like Unix. Also, add some more
error checking, and make some other cosmetic improvements.
No back-patch since it's not clear whether this is fixing any live bug
that would affect 9.1. I'm more concerned about 9.2 anyway given our
considerable recent expansions in the usage of WaitLatch.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In checkpointer and walwriter, avoid calling PostmasterIsAlive unless
WaitLatch has reported WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH. This saves a kernel call per
iteration of the process's outer loop, which is not all that much, but a
cycle shaved is a cycle earned. I had already removed the unconditional
PostmasterIsAlive calls in bgwriter and pgstat in previous patches, but
forgot that WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH is supposed to be treated as untrustworthy
(per comment in unix_latch.c); so adjust those two cases to match.
There are a few other places where the same idea might be applied, but only
after substantial code rearrangement, so I didn't bother.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Get rid of some more naming choices that only make sense if you know that
this code used to be in the bgwriter, as well as some stray comments
referencing the bgwriter.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 6d90eaaa89a007e0d365f49d6436f35d2392cfeb added a hibernation mode
to the bgwriter to reduce the server's idle-power consumption. However,
its interaction with the detailed behavior of BgBufferSync's feedback
control loop wasn't very well thought out. That control loop depends
primarily on the rate of buffer allocation, not the rate of buffer
dirtying, so the hibernation mode has to be designed to operate only when
no new buffer allocations are happening. Also, the check for whether the
system is effectively idle was not quite right and would fail to detect
a constant low level of activity, thus allowing the bgwriter to go into
hibernation mode in a way that would let the cycle time vary quite a bit,
possibly further confusing the feedback loop. To fix, move the wakeup
support from MarkBufferDirty and SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave into
StrategyGetBuffer, and prevent the bgwriter from entering hibernation mode
unless no buffer allocations have happened recently.
In addition, fix the delaying logic to remove the problem of possibly not
responding to signals promptly, which was basically caused by trying to use
the process latch's is_set flag for multiple purposes. I can't prove it
but I'm suspicious that that hack was responsible for the intermittent
"postmaster does not shut down" failures we've been seeing in the buildfarm
lately. In any case it did nothing to improve the readability or
robustness of the code.
In passing, express the hibernation sleep time as a multiplier on
BgWriterDelay, not a constant. I'm not sure whether there's any value in
exposing the longer sleep time as an independently configurable setting,
but we can at least make it act like this for little extra code.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Every time since the current rule for postgres.bki was put in place
when we change the major version, people complain that their tests
fail in strange ways. This is because the version number in
postgres.bki is not updated, because it has no dependency for that.
And you can't even force the rebuild manually if you don't happen to
know which file has the problem. Fix that now before it will happen
again.
The only remaining problem with switching major versions, as far as
the regression tests are concerned, is that contrib needs to be
rebuilt. But that's easily invoked, and in any case the failure modes
are more friendly if you forget that.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Users of asynchronous-commit mode expect there to be a guaranteed maximum
delay before an async commit's WAL records get flushed to disk. The
original version of the walwriter hibernation patch broke that. Add an
extra shared-memory flag to allow async commits to kick the walwriter out
of hibernation mode, without adding any noticeable overhead in cases where
no action is needed.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Latch-ify the stats collector, so that it does not need an arbitrary wakeup
cycle to check for postmaster death. The incremental savings in idle power
is pretty marginal, since we only had it waking every two seconds; but I
believe that this patch may also improve the collector's performance under
load, by reducing the number of kernel calls made per message when messages
are arriving constantly (we now avoid a select/poll call except when we
need to sleep). The change also reduces the time needed for a normal
database shutdown on platforms where signals don't interrupt select().
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch modifies the walwriter process so that, when it has not found
anything useful to do for many consecutive wakeup cycles, it extends its
sleep time to reduce the server's idle power consumption. It reverts to
normal as soon as it's done any successful flushes. It's still true that
during any async commit, backends check for completed, unflushed pages of
WAL and signal the walwriter if there are any; so that in practice the
walwriter can get awakened and returned to normal operation sooner than the
sleep time might suggest.
Also, improve the checkpointer so that it uses a latch and a computed delay
time to not wake up at all except when it has something to do, replacing a
previous hardcoded 0.5 sec wakeup cycle. This also is primarily useful for
reducing the server's power consumption when idle.
In passing, get rid of the dedicated latch for signaling the walwriter in
favor of using its procLatch, since that comports better with possible
generic signal handlers using that latch. Also, fix a pre-existing bug
with failure to save/restore errno in walwriter's signal handlers.
Peter Geoghegan, somewhat simplified by Tom
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"Unexpected EOF on client connection" without an open transaction
is mostly noise, so turn it into DEBUG1. With an open transaction it's
still indicating a problem, so keep those as ERROR, and change the message
to indicate that it happened in a transaction.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 62c7bd31c8878dd45c9b9b2429ab7a12103f3590 had assorted problems, most
visibly that it broke PREPARE TRANSACTION in the presence of session-level
advisory locks (which should be ignored by PREPARE), as per a recent
complaint from Stephen Rees. More abstractly, the patch made the
LockMethodData.transactional flag not merely useless but outright
dangerous, because in point of fact that flag no longer tells you anything
at all about whether a lock is held transactionally. This fix therefore
removes that flag altogether. We now rely entirely on the convention
already in use in lock.c that transactional lock holds must be owned by
some ResourceOwner, while session holds are never so owned. Setting the
locallock struct's owner link to NULL thus denotes a session hold, and
there is no redundant marker for that.
PREPARE TRANSACTION now works again when there are session-level advisory
locks, and it is also able to transfer transactional advisory locks to the
prepared transaction, but for implementation reasons it throws an error if
we hold both types of lock on a single lockable object. Perhaps it will be
worth improving that someday.
Assorted other minor cleanup and documentation editing, as well.
Back-patch to 9.1, except that in the 9.1 branch I did not remove the
LockMethodData.transactional flag for fear of causing an ABI break for
any external code that might be examining those structs.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Postgres 9.2, and perhaps no existing users either.
|
| | |
|
