| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in the planned representation of a subplan at all any more, only SubPlan.
This means subselect.c doesn't scribble on its input anymore, which seems
like a good thing; and there are no longer three different possible
interpretations of a SubLink. Simplify node naming and improve comments
in primnodes.h. No change to stored rules, though.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
execution state trees, and ExecEvalExpr takes an expression state tree
not an expression plan tree. The plan tree is now read-only as far as
the executor is concerned. Next step is to begin actually exploiting
this property.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
so that all executable expression nodes inherit from a common supertype
Expr. This is somewhat of an exercise in code purity rather than any
real functional advance, but getting rid of the extra Oper or Func node
formerly used in each operator or function call should provide at least
a little space and speed improvement.
initdb forced by changes in stored-rules representation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to plan nodes, not vice-versa. All executor state nodes now inherit from
struct PlanState. Copying of plan trees has been simplified by not
storing a list of SubPlans in Plan nodes (eliminating duplicate links).
The executor still needs such a list, but it can build it during
ExecutorStart since it has to scan the plan tree anyway.
No initdb forced since no stored-on-disk structures changed, but you
will need a full recompile because of node-numbering changes.
|
| |
|
|
| |
initdb/regression tests pass.
|
| |
|
|
| |
spacing. Also adds space for one-line comments.
|
| |
|
|
| |
tests pass.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
memory contexts. Currently, only leaks in expressions executed as
quals or projections are handled. Clean up some old dead cruft in
executor while at it --- unused fields in state nodes, that sort of thing.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
nulls with non-nulls using proper three-valued boolean logic. Also clean
up ExecQual to make it clearer that ExecQual *does* follow the SQL spec
for boolean nulls. See '[BUGS] (null) != (null)' thread around 10/26/99
for more detail.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
