aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/include/storage/latch.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Update copyrights for 2013Bruce Momjian2013-01-01
| | | | | Fully update git head, and update back branches in ./COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml files.
* Fix WaitLatch() to return promptly when the requested timeout expires.Tom Lane2012-11-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the sleep is interrupted by a signal, we must recompute the remaining time to wait; otherwise, a steady stream of non-wait-terminating interrupts could delay return from WaitLatch indefinitely. This has been shown to be a problem for the autovacuum launcher, and there may well be other places now or in the future with similar issues. So we'd better make the function robust, even though this'll add at least one gettimeofday call per wait. Back-patch to 9.2. We might eventually need to fix 9.1 as well, but the code is quite different there, and the usage of WaitLatch in 9.1 is so limited that it's not clearly important to do so. Reported and diagnosed by Jeff Janes, though I rewrote his patch rather heavily.
* Split up process latch initialization for more-fail-soft behavior.Tom Lane2012-10-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In the previous coding, new backend processes would attempt to create their self-pipe during the OwnLatch call in InitProcess. However, pipe creation could fail if the kernel is short of resources; and the system does not recover gracefully from a FATAL error right there, since we have armed the dead-man switch for this process and not yet set up the on_shmem_exit callback that would disarm it. The postmaster then forces an unnecessary database-wide crash and restart, as reported by Sean Chittenden. There are various ways we could rearrange the code to fix this, but the simplest and sanest seems to be to split out creation of the self-pipe into a new function InitializeLatchSupport, which must be called from a place where failure is allowed. For most processes that gets called in InitProcess or InitAuxiliaryProcess, but processes that don't call either but still use latches need their own calls. Back-patch to 9.1, which has only a part of the latch logic that 9.2 and HEAD have, but nonetheless includes this bug.
* Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3Bruce Momjian2012-06-10
| | | | commit-fest.
* Reduce idle power consumption of walwriter and checkpointer processes.Tom Lane2012-05-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch modifies the walwriter process so that, when it has not found anything useful to do for many consecutive wakeup cycles, it extends its sleep time to reduce the server's idle power consumption. It reverts to normal as soon as it's done any successful flushes. It's still true that during any async commit, backends check for completed, unflushed pages of WAL and signal the walwriter if there are any; so that in practice the walwriter can get awakened and returned to normal operation sooner than the sleep time might suggest. Also, improve the checkpointer so that it uses a latch and a computed delay time to not wake up at all except when it has something to do, replacing a previous hardcoded 0.5 sec wakeup cycle. This also is primarily useful for reducing the server's power consumption when idle. In passing, get rid of the dedicated latch for signaling the walwriter in favor of using its procLatch, since that comports better with possible generic signal handlers using that latch. Also, fix a pre-existing bug with failure to save/restore errno in walwriter's signal handlers. Peter Geoghegan, somewhat simplified by Tom
* Update copyright notices for year 2012.Bruce Momjian2012-01-01
|
* Documentation improvement and minor code cleanups for the latch facility.Tom Lane2011-08-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Improve the documentation around weak-memory-ordering risks, and do a pass of general editorialization on the comments in the latch code. Make the Windows latch code more like the Unix latch code where feasible; in particular provide the same Assert checks in both implementations. Fix poorly-placed WaitLatch call in syncrep.c. This patch resolves, for the moment, concerns around weak-memory-ordering bugs in latch-related code: we have documented the restrictions and checked that existing calls meet them. In 9.2 I hope that we will install suitable memory barrier instructions in SetLatch/ResetLatch, so that their callers don't need to be quite so careful.
* Introduce a pipe between postmaster and each backend, which can be used toHeikki Linnakangas2011-07-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | detect postmaster death. Postmaster keeps the write-end of the pipe open, so when it dies, children get EOF in the read-end. That can conveniently be waited for in select(), which allows eliminating some of the polling loops that check for postmaster death. This patch doesn't yet change all the loops to use the new mechanism, expect a follow-on patch to do that. This changes the interface to WaitLatch, so that it takes as argument a bitmask of events that it waits for. Possible events are latch set, timeout, postmaster death, and socket becoming readable or writeable. The pipe method behaves slightly differently from the kill() method previously used in PostmasterIsAlive() in the case that postmaster has died, but its parent has not yet read its exit code with waitpid(). The pipe returns EOF as soon as the process dies, but kill() continues to return true until waitpid() has been called (IOW while the process is a zombie). Because of that, change PostmasterIsAlive() to use the pipe too, otherwise WaitLatch() would return immediately with WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH, while PostmasterIsAlive() would claim it's still alive. That could easily lead to busy-waiting while postmaster is in zombie state. Peter Geoghegan with further changes by me, reviewed by Fujii Masao and Florian Pflug.
* pgindent run before PG 9.1 beta 1.Bruce Momjian2011-04-10
|
* Automatically terminate replication connections that are idle for moreHeikki Linnakangas2011-03-30
| | | | | | | | | than replication_timeout (a new GUC) milliseconds. The TCP timeout is often too long, you want the master to notice a dead connection much sooner. People complained about that in 9.0 too, but with synchronous replication it's even more important to notice dead connections promptly. Fujii Masao and Heikki Linnakangas
* Stamp copyrights for year 2011.Bruce Momjian2011-01-01
|
* Remove cvs keywords from all files.Magnus Hagander2010-09-20
|
* Simplify Windows implementation of latches. There's no need to keep aHeikki Linnakangas2010-09-15
| | | | | | | | dynamic pool of event handles, we can permanently assign one for each shared latch. Thanks to that, we no longer need a separate shared memory block for latches, and we don't need to know in advance how many shared latches there is, so you no longer need to remember to update NumSharedLatches when you introduce a new latch to the system.
* Introduce latches. A latch is a boolean variable, with the capability toHeikki Linnakangas2010-09-11
wait until it is set. Latches can be used to reliably wait until a signal arrives, which is hard otherwise because signals don't interrupt select() on some platforms, and even when they do, there's race conditions. On Unix, latches use the so called self-pipe trick under the covers to implement the sleep until the latch is set, without race conditions. On Windows, Windows events are used. Use the new latch abstraction to sleep in walsender, so that as soon as a transaction finishes, walsender is woken up to immediately send the WAL to the standby. This reduces the latency between master and standby, which is good. Preliminary work by Fujii Masao. The latch implementation is by me, with helpful comments from many people.