aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/parse.pl
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Fix ecpg bugs caused by missing semicolons in the backend grammar.Tom Lane2019-02-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The Bison documentation clearly states that a semicolon is required after every grammar rule, and our scripts that generate ecpg's grammar from the backend's implicitly assumed this is true. But it turns out that only ancient versions of Bison actually enforce that. There have been a couple of rules without trailing semicolons in gram.y for some time, and as a consequence, ecpg's grammar was faulty and produced wrong output for the affected statements. To fix, add the missing semis, and add some cross-checks to ecpg's scripts so that they'll bleat if we mess this up again. The cases that were broken were: * "SET variable = DEFAULT" (but not "SET variable TO DEFAULT"), as well as allied syntaxes such as ALTER SYSTEM SET ... DEFAULT. These produced syntactically invalid output that the server would reject. * Multiple type names in DROP TYPE/DOMAIN commands. Only the first type name would be listed in the emitted command. Per report from Daisuke Higuchi. Back-patch to all supported versions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1803D792815FC24D871C00D17AE95905DB51CE@g01jpexmbkw24
* Changed ecpg parser to allow RETURNING clauses without attached C variables.Michael Meskes2017-08-16
|
* Fix typos in comments.Heikki Linnakangas2017-02-06
| | | | | | | | | Backpatch to all supported versions, where applicable, to make backpatching of future fixes go more smoothly. Josh Soref Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACZqfqCf+5qRztLPgmmosr-B0Ye4srWzzw_mo4c_8_B_mtjmJQ@mail.gmail.com
* pgindent run for 9.5Bruce Momjian2015-05-23
|
* Make operator precedence follow the SQL standard more closely.Tom Lane2015-03-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | While the SQL standard is pretty vague on the overall topic of operator precedence (because it never presents a unified BNF for all expressions), it does seem reasonable to conclude from the spec for <boolean value expression> that OR has the lowest precedence, then AND, then NOT, then IS tests, then the six standard comparison operators, then everything else (since any non-boolean operator in a WHERE clause would need to be an argument of one of these). We were only sort of on board with that: most notably, while "<" ">" and "=" had properly low precedence, "<=" ">=" and "<>" were treated as generic operators and so had significantly higher precedence. And "IS" tests were even higher precedence than those, which is very clearly wrong per spec. Another problem was that "foo NOT SOMETHING bar" constructs, such as "x NOT LIKE y", were treated inconsistently because of a bison implementation artifact: they had the documented precedence with respect to operators to their right, but behaved like NOT (i.e., very low priority) with respect to operators to their left. Fixing the precedence issues is just a small matter of rearranging the precedence declarations in gram.y, except for the NOT problem, which requires adding an additional lookahead case in base_yylex() so that we can attach a different token precedence to NOT LIKE and allied two-word operators. The bulk of this patch is not the bug fix per se, but adding logic to parse_expr.c to allow giving warnings if an expression has changed meaning because of these precedence changes. These warnings are off by default and are enabled by the new GUC operator_precedence_warning. It's believed that very few applications will be affected by these changes, but it was agreed that a warning mechanism is essential to help debug any that are.
* Clean up the mess from => patch.Tom Lane2015-03-10
| | | | | | | | | Commit 865f14a2d31af23a05bbf2df04c274629c5d5c4d was quite a few bricks shy of a load: psql, ecpg, and plpgsql were all left out-of-step with the core lexer. Of these only the last was likely to be a fatal problem; but still, a minimal amount of grepping, or even just reading the comments adjacent to the places that were changed, would have found the other places that needed to be changed.
* Improve parser's one-extra-token lookahead mechanism.Tom Lane2015-02-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are a couple of places in our grammar that fail to be strict LALR(1), by requiring more than a single token of lookahead to decide what to do. Up to now we've dealt with that by using a filter between the lexer and parser that merges adjacent tokens into one in the places where two tokens of lookahead are necessary. But that creates a number of user-visible anomalies, for instance that you can't name a CTE "ordinality" because "WITH ordinality AS ..." triggers folding of WITH and ORDINALITY into one token. I realized that there's a better way. In this patch, we still do the lookahead basically as before, but we never merge the second token into the first; we replace just the first token by a special lookahead symbol when one of the lookahead pairs is seen. This requires a couple extra productions in the grammar, but it involves fewer special tokens, so that the grammar tables come out a bit smaller than before. The filter logic is no slower than before, perhaps a bit faster. I also fixed the filter logic so that when backing up after a lookahead, the current token's terminator is correctly restored; this eliminates some weird behavior in error message issuance, as is shown by the one change in existing regression test outputs. I believe that this patch entirely eliminates odd behaviors caused by lookahead for WITH. It doesn't really improve the situation for NULLS followed by FIRST/LAST unfortunately: those sequences still act like a reserved word, even though there are cases where they should be seen as two ordinary identifiers, eg "SELECT nulls first FROM ...". I experimented with additional grammar hacks but couldn't find any simple solution for that. Still, this is better than before, and it seems much more likely that we *could* somehow solve the NULLS case on the basis of this filter behavior than the previous one.
* Update copyright for 2015Bruce Momjian2015-01-06
| | | | Backpatch certain files through 9.0
* pgindent run for 9.4Bruce Momjian2014-05-06
| | | | | This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.
* Update copyright for 2014Bruce Momjian2014-01-07
| | | | | Update all files in head, and files COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml in all back branches.
* Fix whitespace issues found by git diff --check, add gitattributesPeter Eisentraut2013-11-10
| | | | | Set per file type attributes in .gitattributes to fine-tune whitespace checks. With the associated cleanups, the tree is now clean for git
* Sync ECPG with WITH ORDINALITY changesGreg Stark2013-07-29
|
* Update copyrights for 2013Bruce Momjian2013-01-01
| | | | | Fully update git head, and update back branches in ./COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml files.
* Run newly-configured perltidy script on Perl files.Bruce Momjian2012-07-04
| | | | Run on HEAD and 9.2.
* Update copyright notices for year 2012.Bruce Momjian2012-01-01
|
* Move parse2.pl to parse.plPeter Eisentraut2011-06-14
| | | | We have a SCM, so we don't need to keep old versions of files around.
* There is no need to have to identical functions in ecpg thus removing one of ↵Michael Meskes2011-01-09
| | | | them.
* Stamp copyrights for year 2011.Bruce Momjian2011-01-01
|
* Remove useless whitespace at end of linesPeter Eisentraut2010-11-23
|
* Remove cvs keywords from all files.Magnus Hagander2010-09-20
|
* Added variable handling for RETURNING clause to ecpg.Michael Meskes2010-06-04
| | | | | | | While the values were correctly returned they were not moved into C variables as they should be. Closes: #5489
* Change the notation for calling functions with named parameters fromTom Lane2010-05-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | "val AS name" to "name := val", as per recent discussion. This patch catches everything in the original named-parameters patch, but I'm not certain that no other dependencies snuck in later (grepping the source tree for all uses of AS soon proved unworkable). In passing I note that we've dropped the ball at least once on keeping ecpg's lexer (as opposed to parser) in sync with the backend. It would be a good idea to go through all of pgc.l and see if it's in sync now. I didn't attempt that at the moment.
* Update copyright for the year 2010.Bruce Momjian2010-01-02
|
* Added dynamic cursor names to ecpg. Almost the whole patch was done byMichael Meskes2009-11-26
| | | | Boszormenyi Zoltan, with only a minor tweak or two from me.
* Refactor ecpg grammar so that it uses the core grammar's unreserved_keywordTom Lane2009-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | | list, minus a few specific words that have to be treated specially. This replaces a hard-wired list of keywords that would have needed manual maintenance, and was not getting it. The 8.4 coding was already missing these words, causing ecpg to incorrectly treat them as reserved words: CALLED, CATALOG, DEFINER, ENUM, FOLLOWING, INVOKER, OPTIONS, PARTITION, PRECEDING, RANGE, SECURITY, SERVER, UNBOUNDED, WRAPPER. In HEAD we were additionally missing COMMENTS, FUNCTIONS, SEQUENCES, TABLES. Per gripe from Bosco Rama.
* Don't treat NEW and OLD as reserved words anymore. For the purposes of rulesTom Lane2009-11-05
| | | | | | | | it works just as well to have them be ordinary identifiers, and this gets rid of a number of ugly special cases. Plus we aren't interfering with non-rule usage of these names. catversion bump because the names change internally in stored rules.
* Message fixPeter Eisentraut2009-01-29
|
* Update copyright for 2009.Bruce Momjian2009-01-01
|
* Adding script that generates preproc.y from gram.y to CVS.Michael Meskes2008-11-14