| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
INSERT .. ON CONFLICT runs a pre-check of the possible conflicting
constraints before performing the actual speculative insertion. In case
the inserted tuple included TOASTed columns the ON CONFLICT condition
would be handled correctly in case the conflict was caught by the
pre-check, but if two transactions entered the speculative insertion
phase at the same time, one would have to re-try, and the code for
aborting a speculative insertion did not handle deleting the
speculatively inserted TOAST datums correctly.
TOAST deletion would fail with "ERROR: attempted to delete invisible
tuple" as we attempted to remove the TOAST tuples using
simple_heap_delete which reasoned that the given tuples should not be
visible to the command that wrote them.
This commit updates the heap_abort_speculative() function which aborts
the conflicting tuple to use itself, via toast_delete, for deleting
associated TOAST datums. Like before, the inserted toast rows are not
marked as being speculative.
This commit also adds a isolationtester spec test, exercising the
relevant code path. Unfortunately 9.5 cannot handle two waiting
sessions, and thus cannot execute this test.
Reported-By: Viren Negi, Oskari Saarenmaa
Author: Oskari Saarenmaa, edited a bit by me
Bug: #14150
Discussion: <20160519123338.12513.20271@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
Backpatch: 9.5, where ON CONFLICT was introduced
|
| |
|
|
| |
From: Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NUMERIC_MAX_PRECISION is a purely arbitrary constraint on the precision
and scale you can write in a numeric typmod. It might once have had
something to do with the allowed range of a typmod-less numeric value,
but at least since 9.1 we've allowed, and documented that we allowed,
any value that would physically fit in the numeric storage format;
which is something over 100000 decimal digits, not 1000.
Hence, get rid of numeric_in()'s use of NUMERIC_MAX_PRECISION as a limit
on the allowed range of the exponent in scientific-format input. That was
especially silly in view of the fact that you can enter larger numbers as
long as you don't use 'e' to do it. Just constrain the value enough to
avoid localized overflow, and let make_result be the final arbiter of what
is too large. Likewise adjust ecpg's equivalent of this code.
Also get rid of numeric_recv()'s use of NUMERIC_MAX_PRECISION to limit the
number of base-NBASE digits it would accept. That created a dump/restore
hazard for binary COPY without doing anything useful; the wire-format
limit on number of digits (65535) is about as tight as we would want.
In HEAD, also get rid of pg_size_bytes()'s unnecessary intimacy with what
the numeric range limit is. That code doesn't exist in the back branches.
Per gripe from Aravind Kumar. Back-patch to all supported branches,
since they all contain the documentation claim about allowed range of
NUMERIC (cf commit cabf5d84b).
Discussion: <2895.1471195721@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per discussion, we should provide such functions to replace the lost
ability to discover AM properties by inspecting pg_am (cf commit
65c5fcd35). The added functionality is also meant to displace any code
that was looking directly at pg_index.indoption, since we'd rather not
believe that the bit meanings in that field are part of any client API
contract.
As future-proofing, define the SQL API to not assume that properties that
are currently AM-wide or index-wide will remain so unless they logically
must be; instead, expose them only when inquiring about a specific index
or even specific index column. Also provide the ability for an index
AM to override the behavior.
In passing, document pg_am.amtype, overlooked in commit 473b93287.
Andrew Gierth, with kibitzing by me and others
Discussion: <87mvl5on7n.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 874fe3aea changed the command tag returned for CREATE MATVIEW/CREATE
TABLE AS ... WITH NO DATA, but missed that there was code in spi.c that
expected the command tag to always be "SELECT". Fortunately, the
consequence was only an Assert failure, so this oversight should have no
impact in production builds.
Since this code path was evidently un-exercised, add a regression test.
Per report from Shivam Saxena. Back-patch to 9.3, like the previous commit.
Michael Paquier
Report: <97218716-480B-4527-B5CD-D08D798A0C7B@dresources.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ExecEvalCase() tried to save a cycle or two by passing
&econtext->caseValue_isNull as the isNull argument to its sub-evaluation of
the CASE value expression. If that subexpression itself contained a CASE,
then *isNull was an alias for econtext->caseValue_isNull within the
recursive call of ExecEvalCase(), leading to confusion about whether the
inner call's caseValue was null or not. In the worst case this could lead
to a core dump due to dereferencing a null pointer. Fix by not assigning
to the global variable until control comes back from the subexpression.
Also, avoid using the passed-in isNull pointer transiently for evaluation
of WHEN expressions. (Either one of these changes would have been
sufficient to fix the known misbehavior, but it's clear now that each of
these choices was in itself dangerous coding practice and best avoided.
There do not seem to be any similar hazards elsewhere in execQual.c.)
Also, it was possible for inlining of a SQL function that implements the
equality operator used for a CASE comparison to result in one CASE
expression's CaseTestExpr node being inserted inside another CASE
expression. This would certainly result in wrong answers since the
improperly nested CaseTestExpr would be caused to return the inner CASE's
comparison value not the outer's. If the CASE values were of different
data types, a crash might result; moreover such situations could be abused
to allow disclosure of portions of server memory. To fix, teach
inline_function to check for "bare" CaseTestExpr nodes in the arguments of
a function to be inlined, and avoid inlining if there are any.
Heikki Linnakangas, Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Report: https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/pull/327
Report: <4DDCEEB8.50602@enterprisedb.com>
Security: CVE-2016-5423
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In arguments, these meta-commands wrongly treated each pair as closing
the double quoted string. Make the behavior match the documentation.
This is a compatibility break, but I more expect to find software with
untested reliance on the documented behavior than software reliant on
today's behavior. Back-patch to 9.1 (all supported versions).
Reviewed by Tom Lane and Peter Eisentraut.
Security: CVE-2016-5424
|
| |
|
|
| |
07d25a964 changed only one occurrence. Change the other one as well.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is required for the result to be a legal tsvector value.
Noted while fooling with Andreas Seltenreich's ts_delete() crash.
Discussion: <87invhoj6e.fsf@credativ.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Such cases either failed an Assert, or produced a corrupt tsvector in
non-Assert builds, as reported by Andreas Seltenreich. The reason is
that tsvector_delete_by_indices() just assumed that its input array had
no duplicates. Fix by explicitly de-duping.
In passing, improve some comments, and fix a number of tests for null
values to use ERRCODE_NULL_VALUE_NOT_ALLOWED not
ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE.
Discussion: <87invhoj6e.fsf@credativ.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, if an INSERT with multiple rows of VALUES had indirection
(array subscripting or field selection) in its target-columns list, the
parser handled that by applying transformAssignedExpr() to each element
of each VALUES row independently. This led to having ArrayRef assignment
nodes or FieldStore nodes in each row of the VALUES RTE. That works for
simple cases, but in bug #14265 Nuri Boardman points out that it fails
if there are multiple assignments to elements/fields of the same target
column. For such cases to work, rewriteTargetListIU() has to nest the
ArrayRefs or FieldStores together to produce a single expression to be
assigned to the column. But it failed to find them in the top-level
targetlist and issued an error about "multiple assignments to same column".
We could possibly fix this by teaching the rewriter to apply
rewriteTargetListIU to each VALUES row separately, but that would be messy
(it would change the output rowtype of the VALUES RTE, for example) and
inefficient. Instead, let's fix the parser so that the VALUES RTE outputs
are just the user-specified values, cast to the right type if necessary,
and then the ArrayRefs or FieldStores are applied in the top-level
targetlist to Vars representing the RTE's outputs. This is the same
parsetree representation already used for similar cases with INSERT/SELECT
syntax, so it allows simplifications in ruleutils.c, which no longer needs
to treat INSERT-from-multiple-VALUES as its own special case.
This implementation works by applying transformAssignedExpr to the VALUES
entries as before, and then stripping off any ArrayRefs or FieldStores it
adds. With lots of VALUES rows it would be noticeably more efficient to
not add those nodes in the first place. But that's just an optimization
not a bug fix, and there doesn't seem to be any good way to do it without
significant refactoring. (A non-invasive answer would be to apply
transformAssignedExpr + stripping to just the first VALUES row, and then
just forcibly cast remaining rows to the same data types exposed in the
first row. But this way would lead to different, not-INSERT-specific
errors being reported in casting failure cases, so it doesn't seem very
nice.) So leave that for later; this patch at least isn't making the
per-row parsing work worse, and it does make the finished parsetree
smaller, saving rewriter and planner work.
Catversion bump because stored rules containing such INSERTs would need
to change. Because of that, no back-patch, even though this is a very
long-standing bug.
Report: <20160727005725.7438.26021@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
Discussion: <9578.1469645245@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In test 001_stream_rep we're using pg_stat_replication.write_location to
determine catch-up status, but we care about xlog having been applied
not just received, so change that to apply_location.
In test 003_recovery_targets, we query the database for a recovery
target specification and later for the xlog position supposedly
corresponding to that recovery specification. If for whatever reason
more WAL is written between the two queries, the recovery specification
is earlier than the xlog position used by the query in the test harness,
so we wait forever, leading to test failures. Deal with this by using a
single query to extract both items. In 2a0f89cd717 we tried to deal
with it by giving them more tests to run, but in hindsight that was
obviously doomed to failure (no revert of that, though).
Per hamster buildfarm failures.
Author: Michaël Paquier
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This coding pattern creates a race condition, because if an interesting
interrupt happens after we've checked InterruptPending but before we reset
our latch, the latch-setting done by the signal handler would get lost,
and then we might block at WaitLatch in the next iteration without ever
noticing the interrupt condition. You can put the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
before WaitLatch or after ResetLatch, but not between them.
Aside from fixing the bugs, add some explanatory comments to latch.h
to perhaps forestall the next person from making the same mistake.
In HEAD, also replace gather_readnext's direct call of
HandleParallelMessages with CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS. It does not seem clean
or useful for this one caller to bypass ProcessInterrupts and go straight
to HandleParallelMessages; not least because that fails to consider the
InterruptPending flag, resulting in useless work both here
(if InterruptPending isn't set) and in the next CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS call
(if it is).
This thinko seems to have been introduced in the initial coding of
storage/ipc/shm_mq.c (commit ec9037df2), and then blindly copied into all
the subsequent parallel-query support logic. Back-patch relevant hunks
to 9.4 to extirpate the error everywhere.
Discussion: <1661.1469996911@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With the refactoring of pg_dump to handle components, getOwnedSeqs needs
to be a bit more intelligent regarding which components to dump when.
Specifically, we can't simply use the owning table's components as the
set of components to dump as the table might only be including certain
components while all components of the sequence should be dumped, for
example, when the table is a member of an extension while the sequence
is not.
Handle this by combining the set of components to be dumped for the
sequence explicitly and those to be dumped for the table when setting
the components to be dumped for the sequence.
Also add a number of regression tests around this to, hopefully, catch
any future changes which break the expected behavior.
Discovered by: Philippe BEAUDOIN
Reviewed by: Michael Paquier
|
| |
|
|
| |
It's depressingly clear that nobody ever tested this.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Michael Paquier
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commits 4452000f3 et al established semantics for NullTest.argisrow that
are a bit different from its initial conception: rather than being merely
a cache of whether we've determined the input to have composite type,
the flag now has the further meaning that we should apply field-by-field
testing as per the standard's definition of IS [NOT] NULL. If argisrow
is false and yet the input has composite type, the construct instead has
the semantics of IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM NULL. Update the comments in
primnodes.h to clarify this, and fix ruleutils.c and deparse.c to print
such cases correctly. In the case of ruleutils.c, this merely results in
cosmetic changes in EXPLAIN output, since the case can't currently arise
in stored rules. However, it represents a live bug for deparse.c, which
would formerly have sent a remote query that had semantics different
from the local behavior. (From the user's standpoint, this means that
testing a remote nested-composite column for null-ness could have had
unexpected recursive behavior much like that fixed in 4452000f3.)
In a related but somewhat independent fix, make plancat.c set argisrow
to false in all NullTest expressions constructed to represent "attnotnull"
constructs. Since attnotnull is actually enforced as a simple null-value
check, this is a more accurate representation of the semantics; we were
previously overpromising what it meant for composite columns, which might
possibly lead to incorrect planner optimizations. (It seems that what the
SQL spec expects a NOT NULL constraint to mean is an IS NOT NULL test, so
arguably we are violating the spec and should fix attnotnull to do the
other thing. If we ever do, this part should get reverted.)
Back-patch, same as the previous commit.
Discussion: <10682.1469566308@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ExecMakeTableFunctionResult(), which is used in SELECT FROM function(...)
cases, formerly treated a simple NULL output from a function that both
returnsSet and returnsTuple as a violation of the SRF protocol. What seems
better is to treat a NULL output as equivalent to ROW(NULL,NULL,...).
Without this, cases such as SELECT FROM unnest(...) on an array of
composite are vulnerable to unexpected and not-very-helpful failures.
Old code comments here suggested an alternative of just ignoring
simple-NULL outputs, but that doesn't seem very principled.
This change had been hung up for a long time due to uncertainty about
how much we wanted to buy into the equivalence of simple NULL and
ROW(NULL,NULL,...). I think that's been mostly resolved by the discussion
around bug #14235, so let's go ahead and do it.
Per bug #7808 from Joe Van Dyk. Although this is a pretty old report,
fixing it smells a bit more like a new feature than a bug fix, and the
lack of other similar complaints suggests that we shouldn't take much risk
of destabilization by back-patching. (Maybe that could be revisited once
this patch has withstood some field usage.)
Andrew Gierth and Tom Lane
Report: <E1TurJE-0006Es-TK@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, some functions returned various fixed strings and others
failed with a cache lookup error. Per discussion, standardize on
returning NULL. Although user-exposed "cache lookup failed" error
messages might normally qualify for bug-fix treatment, no back-patch;
the risk of breaking user code which is accustomed to the current
behavior seems too high.
Michael Paquier
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The SQL standard appears to specify that IS [NOT] NULL's tests of field
nullness are non-recursive, ie, we shouldn't consider that a composite
field with value ROW(NULL,NULL) is null for this purpose.
ExecEvalNullTest got this right, but eval_const_expressions did not,
leading to weird inconsistencies depending on whether the expression
was such that the planner could apply constant folding.
Also, adjust the docs to mention that IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM NULL can be
used as a substitute test if a simple null check is wanted for a rowtype
argument. That motivated reordering things so that IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM
is described before IS [NOT] NULL. In HEAD, I went a bit further and added
a table showing all the comparison-related predicates.
Per bug #14235. Back-patch to all supported branches, since it's certainly
undesirable that constant-folding should change the semantics.
Report and patch by Andrew Gierth; assorted wordsmithing and revised
regression test cases by me.
Report: <20160708024746.1410.57282@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In an example of TAP test scripts, there is the test checking whether
the result of the query is expected or not. But, in previous example,
the exit code of psql instead of the query result was checked unexpectedly.
Author: Ildar Musin
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These tests are currently only running in buildfarm member hamster,
which is purposefully very slow. This suite has failed a couple of
times recently because of timeouts, so increase the allowed number of
iterations to avoid spurious failures.
Author: Michaël Paquier
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Welsh (cy_GB) apparently sorts 'dd' after 'f', creating problems
analogous to the odd sorting of 'aa' in Danish. Adjust regression
test case to not use data that provokes that.
Jeff Janes
Patch: <CAMkU=1zx-pqcfSApL2pYDQurPOCfcYU0wJorsmY1OrYPiXRbLw@mail.gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some tests added in 9.5 depended on 'aa' sorting before 'bb', which
doesn't hold true in Danish. Use slightly different test data to
avoid the problem.
Jeff Janes
Report: <CAMkU=1w-cEDbA+XHdNb=YS_4wvZbs66Ni9KeSJKAJGNJyOsgQw@mail.gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To ensure that "make installcheck" can be used safely against an existing
installation, we need to be careful about what global object names
(database, role, and tablespace names) we use; otherwise we might
accidentally clobber important objects. There's been a weak consensus that
test databases should have names including "regression", and that test role
names should start with "regress_", but we didn't have any particular rule
about tablespace names; and neither of the other rules was followed with
any consistency either.
This commit moves us a long way towards having a hard-and-fast rule that
regression test databases must have names including "regression", and that
test role and tablespace names must start with "regress_". It's not
completely there because I did not touch some test cases in rolenames.sql
that test creation of special role names like "session_user". That will
require some rethinking of exactly what we want to test, whereas the intent
of this patch is just to hit all the cases in which the needed renamings
are cosmetic.
There is no enforcement mechanism in this patch either, but if we don't
add one we can expect that the tests will soon be violating the convention
again. Again, that's not such a cosmetic change and it will require
discussion. (But I did use a quick-hack enforcement patch to find these
cases.)
Discussion: <16638.1468620817@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On second thought, we should probably do at least a minimal check that
the constructed index is valid, since the big problem with the most
recent breakage was not whether the sorting was correct but that the
index had incorrect hash codes placed in it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We've broken this code path at least twice in the past, so it's prudent
to have a test case that covers it. To allow exercising the code path
without creating a very large (and slow to run) test case, redefine the
sort threshold to be bounded by maintenance_work_mem as well as the number
of available buffers. While at it, fix an ancient oversight that when
building a temp index, the number of available buffers is not NBuffers but
NLocBuffer. Also, if assertions are enabled, apply a direct test that the
sort actually does return the tuples in the expected order.
Peter Geoghegan
Patch: <CAM3SWZTBAo4hjbBd780+MrOKiKp_TMo1N3A0Rw9_im8gbD7fQA@mail.gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When key-share locking a tuple that has been not-key-updated, and the
update is a committed transaction, in some cases we raised
serializability errors:
ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update
Because the key-share doesn't conflict with the update, the error is
unnecessary and inconsistent with the case that the update hasn't
committed yet. This causes problems for some usage patterns, even if it
can be claimed that it's sufficient to retry the aborted transaction:
given a steady stream of updating transactions and a long locking
transaction, the long transaction can be starved indefinitely despite
multiple retries.
To fix, we recognize that HeapTupleSatisfiesUpdate can return
HeapTupleUpdated when an updating transaction has committed, and that we
need to deal with that case exactly as if it were a non-committed
update: verify whether the two operations conflict, and if not, carry on
normally. If they do conflict, however, there is a difference: in the
HeapTupleBeingUpdated case we can just sleep until the concurrent
transaction is gone, while in the HeapTupleUpdated case this is not
possible and we must raise an error instead.
Per trouble report from Olivier Dony.
In addition to a couple of test cases that verify the changed behavior,
I added a test case to verify the behavior that remains unchanged,
namely that errors are raised when a update that modifies the key is
used. That must still generate serializability errors. One
pre-existing test case changes behavior; per discussion, the new
behavior is actually the desired one.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/560AA479.4080807@odoo.com
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20151014164844.3019.25750@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch to 9.3, where the problem appeared.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Digging around bug #14245 I found that commit
6734a1cacd44f5b731933cbc93182b135b167d0c missed that NOT operation is
right associative in opposite to all other. This miss is resposible for
tsquery parser fail on sequence of NOT operations
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
During normalization of tsquery tree it tries to simplify nested NOT
operations but there it's obvioulsy missed that subsequent node could be
a leaf node (value node)
Bug #14245: Segfault on weird to_tsquery
Reported by David Kellum.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Dept of second thoughts: given the RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION that
was just added by commit cec550139, we don't need the reconnection
that used to be here. Might as well buy back a few microseconds.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Test the external-sort code path in CLUSTER for two different scenarios:
multiple-pass external sorting, and the best case for replacement
selection, where only one run is produced, so that no merge is required.
This test would have caught the bug fixed in commit 1b0fc8507, at
least when run with valgrind enabled.
In passing, add a short-circuit test in plan_cluster_use_sort() to make
dead certain that it selects sorting when enable_indexscan is off. As
things stand, that would happen anyway, but it seems like good future
proofing for this test.
Peter Geoghegan
Discussion: <CAM3SWZSgxehDkDMq1FdiW2A0Dxc79wH0hz1x-TnGy=1BXEL+nw@mail.gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change assorted places in our Perl code that did things like
system("prog $path/file");
to do it more like
system('prog', "$path/file");
which is safe against spaces and other special characters in the path
variable. The latter was already the prevailing style, but a few bits
of code hadn't gotten this memo. Back-patch to 9.4 as relevant.
Michael Paquier, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: <20160704.160213.111134711.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per discussion on pgsql-hackers, conninfo is better as the column name
because it's more commonly used in PostgreSQL.
Catalog version bumped due to the change of pg_proc.
Author: Michael Paquier
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ExecInsertIndexTuples treated an exclusion constraint as subject to
noDupErr processing even when it was not listed in arbiterIndexes, and
would therefore not error out for a conflict in such a constraint, instead
returning it as an arbiter-index failure. That led to an infinite loop in
ExecInsert, since ExecCheckIndexConstraints ignored the index as-intended
and therefore didn't throw the expected error. To fix, make the exclusion
constraint code path use the same condition as the index_insert call does
to decide whether no-error-for-duplicates behavior is appropriate. While
at it, refactor a little bit to avoid unnecessary list_member_oid calls.
(That surely wouldn't save anything worth noticing, but I find the code
a bit clearer this way.)
Per bug report from Heikki Rauhala. Back-patch to 9.5 where ON CONFLICT
was introduced.
Report: <4C976D6B-76B4-434C-8052-D009F7B7AEDA@reaktor.fi>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In commit 915b703e1 I gave get_agg_clause_costs() the responsibility of
marking Aggref nodes with the appropriate aggtranstype. I failed to notice
that where it was being called from, it might see only a subset of the
Aggref nodes that were in the original targetlist. Specifically, if there
are duplicate aggregate calls in the tlist, either make_sort_input_target
or make_window_input_target might put just a single instance into the
grouping_target, and then only that instance would get marked. Fix by
moving the call back into grouping_planner(), before we start building
assorted PathTargets from the query tlist. Per report from Stefan Huehner.
Report: <20160702131056.GD3165@huehner.biz>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In commit 68fa28f77 I tried to teach SS_finalize_plan() to cope with
initPlans attached anywhere in the plan tree, by dint of moving its
handling of those into the recursion in finalize_plan(). It turns out that
that doesn't really work: if a lower-level plan node emits an initPlan
output parameter in its targetlist, it's legitimate for upper levels to
reference those Params --- and at the point where this code runs, those
references look just like the Param itself, so finalize_plan() quite
properly rejects them as being in the wrong place. We could lobotomize
the checks enough to allow that, probably, but then it's not clear that
we'd have any meaningful check for misplaced Params at all. What seems
better, at least in the near term, is to tweak standard_planner() a bit
so that initPlans are never placed anywhere but the topmost plan node
for a query level, restoring the behavior that occurred pre-9.6. Possibly
we can do better if this code is ever merged into setrefs.c: then it would
be possible to check a Param's placement only when we'd failed to replace
it with a Var referencing a child plan node's targetlist.
BTW, I'm now suspicious that finalize_plan is doing the wrong thing by
returning the node's allParam rather than extParam to be incorporated
in the parent node's set of used parameters. However, it makes no
difference given that initPlans only appear at top level, so I'll leave
that alone for now.
Another thing that emerged from this is that standard_planner() needs
to check for initPlans before deciding that it's safe to stick a Gather
node on top in force_parallel_mode mode. We previously guarded against
that by deciding the plan wasn't wholePlanParallelSafe if any subplans
had been found, but after commit 5ce5e4a12 it's necessary to have this
substitute test, because path parallel_safe markings don't account for
initPlans. (Normally, we'd have decided the paths weren't safe anyway
due to appearances of SubPlan nodes, Params, or CTE scans somewhere in
the tree --- but it's possible for those all to be optimized away while
initPlans still remain.)
Per fuzz testing by Andreas Seltenreich.
Report: <874m89rw7x.fsf@credativ.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As of 9.6, pg_regress doesn't build unless storage/lwlocknames.h has been
created; but there was nothing forcing that to happen if you just went into
src/test/regress/ and built there. We previously had a similar complaint
about plpython.
To fix in a way that won't break next time we invent a generated header,
make src/backend/Makefile expose a phony target for updating all the
include files it builds, and invoke that before building pg_regress or
plpython. In principle, maybe we ought to invoke that everywhere; but
it would add a lot of usually-useless make cycles, so let's just do it
in the places where people have complained.
I made a couple of cosmetic adjustments in src/backend/Makefile as well,
to deal with the generated headers in consistent orders.
Michael Paquier and Tom Lane
Report: <31398.1467036827@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Report: <20150916200959.GB32090@msg.df7cb.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 3fc6e2d7f5b652b417fa6937c34de2438d60fa9f introduced new "upper"
RelOptInfo structures but didn't set consider_parallel for them
correctly, a point I completely missed when reviewing it. Later,
commit e06a38965b3bcdaa881e7e06892d4d8ab6c2c980 made the situation
worse by doing it incorrectly for the grouping relation. Try to
straighten all of that out. Along the way, get rid of the annoying
wholePlanParallelSafe flag, which was only necessarily because of
the fact that upper planning stages didn't use paths at the time
that code was written.
The most important immediate impact of these changes is that
force_parallel_mode will provide useful test coverage in quite a few
more scenarios than it did previously, but it's also necessary
preparation for fixing some problems related to subqueries.
Patch by me, reviewed by Tom Lane.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In non-text output formats, parallelized aggregates were reporting
"Partial" or "Finalize" as a field named "Operation", which might be all
right in the absence of any context --- but other plan node types use that
field to report SQL-visible semantics, such as Select/Insert/Update/Delete.
So that naming choice didn't seem good to me. I changed it to "Partial
Mode".
Also, the field did not appear at all for a non-parallelized Agg plan node,
which is contrary to expectation in non-text formats. We're notionally
producing objects that conform to a schema, so the set of fields for a
given node type and EXPLAIN mode should be well-defined. I set it up to
fill in "Simple" in such cases.
Other fields that were added for parallel query, namely "Parallel Aware"
and Gather's "Single Copy", had not gotten the word on that point either.
Make them appear always in non-text output.
Also, the latter two fields were nominally producing boolean output, but
were getting it wrong, because bool values shouldn't be quoted in JSON or
YAML. Somehow we'd not needed an ExplainPropertyBool formatting subroutine
before 9.6; but now we do, so invent it.
Discussion: <16002.1466972724@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Per buildfarm.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since get_relation_foreign_keys doesn't try to determine whether RTEs
are actually part of the query semantics, it might make FK info records
linking to RTEs that won't have a RelOptInfo at all. Cope with that.
Per bug #14219 from Andrew Gierth.
Report: <20160629183338.1397.43514@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we need to use a gating Result node for pseudoconstant quals,
create_scan_plan() intentionally suppresses use_physical_tlist's checks
on whether there are matches for sortgroupref labels, on the grounds that
we don't need matches because we can label the Result's projection output
properly. However, it then called apply_pathtarget_labeling_to_tlist
anyway. This oversight was harmless when written, but in commit aeb9ae645
I made that function throw an error if there was no match. Thus, the
combination of a table scan, pseudoconstant quals, and a non-simple-Var
sortgroupref column threw the dreaded "ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found
in targetlist" error. To fix, just skip applying the labeling in this
case. Per report from Rushabh Lathia.
Report: <CAGPqQf2iLB8t6t-XrL-zR233DFTXxEsfVZ4WSqaYfLupEoDxXA@mail.gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, these commands always planned the given query and went through
executor startup before deciding not to actually run the query if WITH NO
DATA is specified. This behavior is problematic for pg_dump because it
may cause errors to be raised that we would rather not see before a
REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command is issued. See for example bug #13907
from Marian Krucina. This change is not sufficient to fix that particular
bug, because we also need to tweak pg_dump to issue the REFRESH later,
but it's a necessary step on the way.
A user-visible side effect of doing things this way is that the returned
command tag for WITH NO DATA cases will now be "CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW"
or "CREATE TABLE AS", not "SELECT 0". We could preserve the old behavior
but it would take more code, and arguably that was just an implementation
artifact not intended behavior anyhow.
In 9.5 and HEAD, also get rid of the static variable CreateAsReladdr, which
was trouble waiting to happen; there is not any prohibition on nested
CREATE commands.
Back-patch to 9.3 where CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW was introduced.
Michael Paquier and Tom Lane
Report: <20160202161407.2778.24659@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
<-> operator now have higher predecence than & (AND) operator. This change
was motivated by unexpected difference of similar queries:
'a & b <-> c'::tsquery and 'b <-> c & a'. Before first query means
(a & b) <-> c and second one - '(b <-> c) & a', now phrase operator evaluates
first.
Per suggestion from Tom Lane 32260.1465402409@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If there is no positional information of lexemes then phrase operator will not
fallback to AND operator. This change makes needing to modify TS_execute()
interface, because somewhere (in indexes, for example) positional information
is unaccesible and in this cases we need to force fallback to AND.
Per discussion c19fcfec308e6ccd952cdde9e648b505@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Phrase operator now requires exact distance betweens lexems instead of
less-or-equal.
Per discussion c19fcfec308e6ccd952cdde9e648b505@mail.gmail.com
|
