| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In similar vein to b6ef167564, add pg_lfind8() and pg_lfind8_le()
to search for bytes equal or less-than-or-equal to a given byte,
respectively. To abstract away platform details, add helper functions
and typedefs to simd.h.
John Naylor and Nathan Bossart, per suggestion from Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFBsxsGzaaGLF%3DNuq61iRXTyspbO9rOjhSqFN%3DV6ozzmta5mXg%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The GRANT statement can now specify WITH INHERIT TRUE or WITH
INHERIT FALSE to control whether the member inherits the granted
role's permissions. For symmetry, you can now likewise write
WITH ADMIN TRUE or WITH ADMIN FALSE to turn ADMIN OPTION on or off.
If a GRANT does not specify WITH INHERIT, the behavior based on
whether the member role is marked INHERIT or NOINHERIT. This means
that if all roles are marked INHERIT or NOINHERIT before any role
grants are performed, the behavior is identical to what we had before;
otherwise, it's different, because ALTER ROLE [NO]INHERIT now only
changes the default behavior of future grants, and has no effect on
existing ones.
Patch by me. Reviewed and testing by Nathan Bossart and Tushar Ahuja,
with design-level comments from various others.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmoa5Sf4PiWrfxA=sGzDKg0Ojo3dADw=wAHOhR9dggV=RmQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The optimization is named kill_prior_tuple but was accidentally
spelled kill_prio_tuple in the test.
Author: Mingli Zhang <avamingli@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/82d3e66a-d8ae-4bfa-943e-29c5add0743f@Spark
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, membership of role A in role B could be recorded in the
catalog tables only once. This meant that a new grant of role A to
role B would overwrite the previous grant. For other object types, a
new grant of permission on an object - in this case role A - exists
along side the existing grant provided that the grantor is different.
Either grant can be revoked independently of the other, and
permissions remain so long as at least one grant remains. Make role
grants work similarly.
Previously, when granting membership in a role, the superuser could
specify any role whatsoever as the grantor, but for other object types,
the grantor of record must be either the owner of the object, or a
role that currently has privileges to perform a similar GRANT.
Implement the same scheme for role grants, treating the bootstrap
superuser as the role owner since roles do not have owners. This means
that attempting to revoke a grant, or admin option on a grant, can now
fail if there are dependent privileges, and that CASCADE can be used
to revoke these. It also means that you can't grant ADMIN OPTION on
a role back to a user who granted it directly or indirectly to you,
similar to how you can't give WITH GRANT OPTION on a privilege back
to a role which granted it directly or indirectly to you.
Previously, only the superuser could specify GRANTED BY with a user
other than the current user. Relax that rule to allow the grantor
to be any role whose privileges the current user posseses. This
doesn't improve compatibility with what we do for other object types,
where support for GRANTED BY is entirely vestigial, but it makes this
feature more usable and seems to make sense to change at the same time
we're changing related behaviors.
Along the way, fix "ALTER GROUP group_name ADD USER user_name" to
require the same privileges as "GRANT group_name TO user_name".
Previously, CREATEROLE privileges were sufficient for either, but
only the former form was permissible with ADMIN OPTION on the role.
Now, either CREATEROLE or ADMIN OPTION on the role suffices for
either spelling.
Patch by me, reviewed by Stephen Frost.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaFr-RZeQ+WoQ5nKPv97oT9+aDgK_a5+qWHSgbDsMp1Vg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The ecpg tests have their input directory in the build directory, as the tests
need to be built. Until now that required copying the expected/ directory to
the build directory in VPATH builds. To avoid needing to implement the same
for the meson build, add support for specifying the location of the expected
directory.
Now that that's not needed anymore, remove the copying of ecpg's expected
directory to the build directory in VPATH builds.
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220718202327.pspcqz5mwbi2yb7w@awork3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In a similar effort to f01592f91, here we further reduce the warnings we
get about local variables being shadowed when building with
-Wshadow=compatible-local. This small change reduces the overall number
of warnings by 36.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqBBqF=wmV5azrO7h3VwpwQo+JFBQ+g=E6wVUhKcqR8gA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, "GRANT foo TO bar" or "GRANT foo TO bar GRANTED BY baz"
would record the OID of the grantor in pg_auth_members.grantor, but
that role could later be dropped without modifying or removing the
pg_auth_members record. That's not great, because we typically try
to avoid dangling references in catalog data.
Now, a role grant depends on the grantor, and the grantor can't be
dropped without removing the grant or changing the grantor. "DROP
OWNED BY" will remove the grant, just as it does for other kinds of
privileges. "REASSIGN OWNED BY" will not, again just like what we do
in other cases involving privileges.
pg_auth_members now has an OID column, because that is needed in order
for dependencies to work. It also now has an index on the grantor
column, because otherwise dropping a role would require a sequential
scan of the entire table to see whether the role's OID is in use as
a grantor. That probably wouldn't be too large a problem in practice,
but it seems better to have an index just in case.
A follow-on patch is planned with the goal of more thoroughly
rationalizing the behavior of role grants. This patch is just trying
to do enough to make sure that the data we store in the catalogs is at
some basic level valid.
Patch by me, reviewed by Stephen Frost
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaFr-RZeQ+WoQ5nKPv97oT9+aDgK_a5+qWHSgbDsMp1Vg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When creating a partitioned index, DefineIndex tries to identify
any existing indexes on the partitions that match the partitioned
index, so that it can absorb those as child indexes instead of
building new ones. Part of the matching is to compare IndexInfo
structs --- but that wasn't done quite right. We're comparing
the IndexInfo built within DefineIndex itself to one made from
existing catalog contents by BuildIndexInfo. Notably, while
BuildIndexInfo will run index expressions and predicates through
expression preprocessing, that has not happened to DefineIndex's
struct. The result is failure to match and subsequent creation
of duplicate indexes.
The easiest and most bulletproof fix is to build a new IndexInfo
using BuildIndexInfo, thereby guaranteeing that the processing done
is identical.
While here, let's also extract the opfamily and collation data
from the new partitioned index, removing ad-hoc logic that
duplicated knowledge about how those are constructed.
Per report from Christophe Pettus. Back-patch to v11 where
we invented partitioned indexes.
Richard Guo and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8864BFAA-81FD-4BF9-8E06-7DEB8D4164ED@thebuild.com
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make build_joinrel_tlist() responsible for adding PHVs that were
already computed in one or the other input relation, and therefore
change add_placeholders_to_joinrel() to only add PHVs that will be
newly computed in this joinrel's output. This makes the handling
of PHVs in build_joinrel_tlist() more like its handling of plain
Vars, which seems like a good thing on intelligibility grounds
and will simplify planned future changes. There is a purely
cosmetic side-effect that the order of entries in the joinrel's
tlist may change; but since it becomes more like the order of
entries in the input tlists, that's not bad.
The reason it wasn't done like this originally was the potential
cost of looking up PlaceHolderInfo entries to consult ph_needed.
Now that that's O(1) it shouldn't hurt.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1405792.1660677844@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The standard way to check for list emptiness is to compare the
List pointer to NIL; our list code goes out of its way to ensure
that that is the only representation of an empty list. (An
acceptable alternative is a plain boolean test for non-null
pointer, but explicit mention of NIL is usually preferable.)
Various places didn't get that memo and expressed the condition
with list_length(), which might not be so bad except that there
were such a variety of ways to check it exactly: equal to zero,
less than or equal to zero, less than one, yadda yadda. In the
name of code readability, let's standardize all those spellings
as "list == NIL" or "list != NIL". (There's probably some
microscopic efficiency gain too, though few of these look to be
at all performance-critical.)
A very small number of cases were left as-is because they seemed
more consistent with other adjacent list_length tests that way.
Peter Smith, with bikeshedding from a number of us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PtQYe+ENX5KrONMfugf0q6NHg4hR5dAhqEXEc2eefFeig@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This event can happen when using SET ACCESS METHOD, as the data files of
the materialized need a full refresh but this command tag was not
updated to reflect that. The documentation is updated to track this
behavior.
Author: Onder Kalaci
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACawEhXwHN3X34FiwoYG8vXR-oyUdrp7qcfRWSzS+NPahS5gSw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current publisher code checks if UPDATE or DELETE can be executed with
the replica identity of the table even if it's a partitioned table. We can
skip checking the replica identity for partitioned tables because the
operations are actually performed on the leaf partitions (not the
partitioned table).
Reported-by: Brad Nicholson
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMMnM%3D8i5DohH%3DYKzV0_wYuYSYvuOJoL9F5nzXTc%2ByzsG1f6rg%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since HAVE_UNIX_SOCKETS is now defined unconditionally, remove the macro
and drop a small amount of dead code.
The last known systems not to have them (as far as I know at least) were
QNX, which we de-supported years ago, and Windows, which now has them.
If a new OS ever shows up with the POSIX sockets API but without working
AF_UNIX, it'll presumably still be able to compile the code, and fail at
runtime with an unsupported address family error. We might want to
consider adding a HINT that you should turn off the option to use it if
your network stack doesn't support it at that point, but it doesn't seem
worth making the relevant code conditional at compile time.
Also adjust a couple of places in the docs and comments that referred to
builds without Unix-domain sockets, since there aren't any. Windows
still gets a special mention in those places, though, because we don't
try to use them by default there yet.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BL_3brvh%3D8e0BW_VfX9h7MtwgN%3DnFHP5o7X2oZucY9dg%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
<sys/resource.h> is in SUSv2 and is on all targeted Unix systems. We
have a replacement for getrusage() on Windows, so let's just move its
declarations into src/include/port/win32/sys/resource.h so that we can
use a standard-looking #include. Also remove an obsolete reference to
CLK_TCK. Also rename src/port/getrusage.c to win32getrusage.c,
following the convention for Windows-only fallback code.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BL_3brvh%3D8e0BW_VfX9h7MtwgN%3DnFHP5o7X2oZucY9dg%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
<sys/select.h> is in SUSv3 and every targeted Unix system has it.
Provide an empty header in src/include/port/win32 so that we can
include it unguarded even on Windows.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BL_3brvh%3D8e0BW_VfX9h7MtwgN%3DnFHP5o7X2oZucY9dg%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The grammar added for MERGE inadvertently made it accepted syntax in
places that were not prepared to deal with it -- namely COPY and inside
CTEs, but invoking these things with MERGE currently causes assertion
failures or weird misbehavior in non-assertion builds. Protect those
places by checking for it explicitly until somebody decides to implement
it.
Reported-by: Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17579-82482cd7b267b862@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fmgr_sql must make expanded-datum arguments read-only, because
it's possible that the function body will pass the argument to
more than one callee function. If one of those functions takes
the datum's R/W property as license to scribble on it, then later
callees will see an unexpected value, leading to wrong answers.
From a performance standpoint, it'd be nice to skip this in the
common case that the argument value is passed to only one callee.
However, detecting that seems fairly hard, and certainly not
something that I care to attempt in a back-patched bug fix.
Per report from Adam Mackler. This has been broken since we
invented expanded datums, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/WScDU5qfoZ7PB2gXwNqwGGgDPmWzz08VdydcPFLhOwUKZcdWbblbo-0Lku-qhuEiZoXJ82jpiQU4hOjOcrevYEDeoAvz6nR0IU4IHhXnaCA=@mackler.email
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/187436.1660143060@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
| |
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3F066AFE-19F9-4DF5-A498-B09643857A39@yesql.se
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use SSE2 intrinsics to speed up the search, where available. Otherwise,
use a simple 'for' loop. The motivation to add this now is to speed up
XidInMVCCSnapshot(), which is the reason only unsigned 32-bit integer
arrays are optimized. Other types are left for future work, as is the
extension of this technique to non-x86 platforms.
Nathan Bossart
Reviewed by: Andres Freund, Bharath Rupireddy, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220713170950.GA3116318%40nathanxps13
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per buildfarm, the output order of \dx+ isn't consistent across
locales. Apply NO_LOCALE to force C locale. There might be a
more localized way, but I'm not seeing it offhand, and anyway
there is nothing in this test module that particularly cares
about locales.
Security: CVE-2022-2625
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, if an extension script did CREATE OR REPLACE and there was
an existing object not belonging to the extension, it would overwrite
the object and adopt it into the extension. This is problematic, first
because the overwrite is probably unintentional, and second because we
didn't change the object's ownership. Thus a hostile user could create
an object in advance of an expected CREATE EXTENSION command, and would
then have ownership rights on an extension object, which could be
modified for trojan-horse-type attacks.
Hence, forbid CREATE OR REPLACE of an existing object unless it already
belongs to the extension. (Note that we've always forbidden replacing
an object that belongs to some other extension; only the behavior for
previously-free-standing objects changes here.)
For the same reason, also fail CREATE IF NOT EXISTS when there is
an existing object that doesn't belong to the extension.
Our thanks to Sven Klemm for reporting this problem.
Security: CVE-2022-2625
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Per buildfarm member snapper
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/129951.1659812518@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 59be1c942a47 already tried to make
src/test/recovery/t/033_replay_tsp_drops more reliable, but it wasn't
enough. Try to improve on that by making this use of a replication slot
to be more like others. Also, don't drop the slot.
Make a few other stylistic changes while at it. It's still quite slow,
which is another thing that we need to fix in this script.
Backpatch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/349302.1659191875@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since v14, the extended stats machinery will try to estimate for
otherwise-unsupported boolean expressions if they match an expression
available from an extended stats object. mcv.c did not get the memo
about this, and would spit up with "unknown clause type". Fortunately
the case is easy to handle, since we can expect the expression yields
boolean.
While here, replace some not-terribly-on-point assertions with
simpler runtime tests for lookup failure. That seems appropriate
so that we get an elog not a crash if we somehow get to the new
it-should-be-a-bool-expression code with a subexpression that
doesn't match any stats column.
Per report from Danny Shemesh. Thanks to Justin Pryzby for
preliminary investigation.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFZC=QqD6=27wQPOW1pbRa98KPyuyn+7cL_Ay_Ck-roZV84vHg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
statext_is_compatible_clause_internal() checked that the arguments
of a ScalarArrayOpExpr are one Var and one Const, but it would allow
cases where the Const was on the left. Subsequent uses of the clause
are not expecting that and would suffer assertion failures or core
dumps. mcv.c also had not bothered to cope with the case of a NULL
array constant, which seems really unacceptably sloppy of somebody.
(Although our tools failed us there too, since AFAIK neither Coverity
nor any compiler warned of the obvious use-of-uninitialized-variable
condition.) It seems best to handle that by having
statext_is_compatible_clause_internal() reject it.
Noted while fixing bug #17570. Back-patch to v13 where the
extended stats code grew some awareness of ScalarArrayOpExpr.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit a4d75c86b improved the extended-stats logic to allow extended
stats to be collected on expressions not just bare Vars. To apply
such stats, we first verify that the user has permissions to read all
columns used in the stats. (If not, the query will likely fail at
runtime, but the planner ought not do so.) That had to get extended
to check permissions of columns appearing within such expressions,
but the code for that was completely wrong: it applied pull_varattnos
to the wrong pointer, leading to "unrecognized node type" failures.
Furthermore, although you couldn't get to this because of that bug,
it failed to account for the attnum offset applied by pull_varattnos.
This escaped recognition so far because the code in question is not
reached when the user has whole-table SELECT privilege (which is the
common case), and because only subexpressions not specially handled
by statext_is_compatible_clause_internal() are at risk.
I think a large part of the reason for this bug is under-documentation
of what statext_is_compatible_clause() is doing and what its arguments
are, so do some work on the comments to try to improve that.
Per bug #17570 from Alexander Kozhemyakin. Patch by Richard Guo;
comments and other cosmetic improvements by me. (Thanks also to
Japin Li for diagnosis.) Back-patch to v14 where the bug came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17570-f2f2e0f4bccf0965@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
That bit is unlogged and therefore it's wrong to consider it in WAL page
comparison.
Add a test that tickles the case, as branch testing technology allows.
This has been a problem ever since wal consistency checking was
introduced (commit a507b86900f6 for pg10), so backpatch to all supported
branches.
Author: 王海洋 (Haiyang Wang) <wanghaiyang.001@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACciXAD2UvLMOhc4jX9VvOKt7DtYLr3OYRBhvOZ-jRxtzc_7Jg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACciXADOfErX9Bx0nzE_SkdfXr6Bbpo5R=v_B6MUTEYW4ya+cg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Having additional triggers in a test table made the ORDER BY clauses in
old queries underspecified. Add another column there for stability.
Per sporadic buildfarm pink.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using ATSimpleRecursion() in ATPrepCmd() to do so as bbb927b4db9b did is
not correct, because ATPrepCmd() can't distinguish between triggers that
may be cloned and those that may not, so would wrongly try to recurse
for the latter category of triggers.
So this commit restores the code in EnableDisableTrigger() that
86f575948c77 had added to do the recursion, which would do it only for
triggers that may be cloned, that is, row-level triggers. This also
changes tablecmds.c such that ATExecCmd() is able to pass the value of
ONLY flag down to EnableDisableTrigger() using its new 'recurse'
parameter.
This also fixes what seems like an oversight of 86f575948c77 that the
recursion to partition triggers would only occur if EnableDisableTrigger()
had actually changed the trigger. It is more apt to recurse to inspect
partition triggers even if the parent's trigger didn't need to be
changed: only then can we be certain that all descendants share the same
state afterwards.
Backpatch all the way back to 11, like bbb927b4db9b. Care is taken not
to break ABI compatibility (and that no catversion bump is needed.)
Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqG-cZT3XzGAnEgZQLoQbyfJApVwOTQaCaas1mhpf+4V5A@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was a simple omission in 9d9c02ccd where the code didn't correctly
set the operator to use in the run condition OpExpr when the window
function was both monotonically increasing and decreasing.
Bug discovered by Julien Roze, although he did not report it.
Reported-by: Phil Florent
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/PA4P191MB160009A09B9D0624359278CFBA9F9@PA4P191MB1600.EURP191.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Backpatch-through: 15, where 9d9c02ccd was added
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
getrlimit() is in SUSv2 and all targeted systems have it.
Windows doesn't have it. We could just use #ifndef WIN32, but for a
little more explanation about why we're making things conditional, let's
retain the HAVE_GETRLIMIT macro. It's defined in port.h for Unix systems.
On systems that have it, it's not necessary to test for RLIMIT_CORE,
RLIMIT_STACK or RLIMIT_NOFILE macros, since SUSv2 requires those and all
targeted systems have them. Also remove references to a pre-historic
alternative spelling of RLIMIT_NOFILE, and coding that seemed to believe
that Cygwin didn't have it.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGJ3LHeP9w5Fgzdr4G8AnEtJ=z=p6hGDEm4qYGEUX5B6fQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adjusting this function was overlooked in commit 94aa7cc5f. The only
visible symptom (so far) is that INSERT ... ON CONFLICT could go into
an endless loop when inserting a null that has a conflict.
Richard Guo and Tom Lane, per bug #17558 from Andrew Kesper
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17558-3f6599ffcf52fd4a@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove the test case added by commit fac1b470a, which never actually
worked to expose the problem it claimed to test. Replace it with
a case that does expose the problem, and also covers the SRF-not-
at-the-top deficiency repaired in 1aa8dad41.
Richard Guo, with some editorialization by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17564-c7472c2f90ef2da3@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The sto_using_cursor and sto_using_select tests were coded to exercise
every permutation of their test steps, but AFAICS there is no value in
exercising more than one. This matters because each permutation costs
about six seconds, thanks to the "pg_sleep(6)". Perhaps we could
reduce that, but the useless permutations seem worth getting rid of
in any case. (Note that sto_using_hash_index got it right already.)
While here, clean up some other sloppiness such as an unused table.
This doesn't make too much difference in interactive testing, since the
wasted time is typically masked by parallelization with other tests.
However, the buildfarm runs this as a serial step, which means we can
expect to shave ~40 seconds from every buildfarm run. That makes it
worth back-patching.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2515192.1659454702@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The TAP tests for logical replication in src/test/subscription are using
the following code in many places to make sure that the subscription is
synchronized with the publisher:
$node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('tap_sub');
$node_subscriber->poll_query_until('postgres',
qq[SELECT count(1) = 0
FROM pg_subscription_rel
WHERE srsubstate NOT IN ('r', 's')]);
The new function wait_for_subscription_sync() can be used to replace the
above code. This eliminates duplicated code and makes it easier to write
future tests.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed by: Amit Kapila, Shi yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoC-fvAkaKHa4t1urupwL8xbAcWRePeETvshvy80f6WV1A@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, a byte with the high bit set was just transmitted
as-is by charin() and charout(). This is problematic if the
database encoding is multibyte, because the result of charout()
won't be validly encoded, which breaks various stuff that
expects all text strings to be validly encoded. We've
previously decided to enforce encoding validity rather than try
to individually harden each place that might have a problem with
such strings, so it's time to do something about "char".
To fix, represent high-bit-set characters as \ooo (backslash
and three octal digits), following the ancient "escape" format
for bytea. charin() will continue to accept the old way as well,
though that is only reachable in single-byte encodings.
Add some test cases just so there is coverage for this code.
We'll otherwise leave this question undocumented as it was before,
because we don't really want to encourage end-user use of "char".
For the moment, back-patch into v15 so that this change appears
in 15beta3. If there's not great pushback we should consider
absorbing this change into the older branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2318797.1638558730@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggreagtes have, since implemented in Postgres, been
executed by always performing a sort in nodeAgg.c to sort the tuples in
the current group into the correct order before calling the transition
function on the sorted tuples. This was not great as often there might be
an index that could have provided pre-sorted input and allowed the
transition functions to be called as the rows come in, rather than having
to store them in a tuplestore in order to sort them once all the tuples
for the group have arrived.
Here we change the planner so it requests a path with a sort order which
supports the most amount of ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregate functions and
add new code to the executor to allow it to support the processing of
ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates where the tuples are already sorted in the
correct order.
Since there can be many ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates in any given query
level, it's very possible that we can't find an order that suits all of
these aggregates. The sort order that the planner chooses is simply the
one that suits the most aggregate functions. We take the most strictly
sorted variation of each order and see how many aggregate functions can
use that, then we try again with the order of the remaining aggregates to
see if another order would suit more aggregate functions. For example:
SELECT agg(a ORDER BY a),agg2(a ORDER BY a,b) ...
would request the sort order to be {a, b} because {a} is a subset of the
sort order of {a,b}, but;
SELECT agg(a ORDER BY a),agg2(a ORDER BY c) ...
would just pick a plan ordered by {a} (we give precedence to aggregates
which are earlier in the targetlist).
SELECT agg(a ORDER BY a),agg2(a ORDER BY b),agg3(a ORDER BY b) ...
would choose to order by {b} since two aggregates suit that vs just one
that requires input ordered by {a}.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Ronan Dunklau, James Coleman, Ranier Vilela, Richard Guo, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpHzfo92%3DR4W0%2BxVua3BUYCKMckWAmo-2t_KiXN-wYH%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An oversight in 8f2e2bbf14.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 15, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoC-fvAkaKHa4t1urupwL8xbAcWRePeETvshvy80f6WV1A@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The select_outer_pathkeys_for_merge function made an attempt to build the
merge join pathkeys in the same order as query_pathkeys. This was done as
it may have led to no sort being required for an ORDER BY or GROUP BY
clause in the upper planner. However, this restriction seems overly
strict as it required that we match the query_pathkeys entirely or we
don't bother putting the merge join pathkeys in that order.
Here we relax this rule so that we use a prefix of the query_pathkeys
providing that prefix matches all of the join quals. This may provide the
upper planner with partially sorted input which will allow the use of
incremental sorts instead of full sorts.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrtZu0PHVfDPFM4Yx3jNR2Wuwosv+T2zqa7LrhhBr2rRg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per buildfarm member wrasse, that looks to open a transaction when it
loads its .psqlrc, causing the test to fail.
Oversight in ad34146.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit adds some test coverage for ee79647 (prevent BASE_BACKUP
from running in the middle of another base backup) and b24b2be
(BASE_BACKUP cancellation followed by pg_backup_start), caused by the
interactions of replication and SQL commands in a logical replication
connection in a WAL sender.
The second test uses a design close to what has been introduced in
0475a97f, where BASE_BACKUP is throttled to give enough room for a
cancellation, though this time we rely on psql with multiple -c
switches to keep a connection around for the second query.
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Ys/NCI4Eo9300GnQ@paquier.xyz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the short time this function has existed, it's already proven to be
a nontrivial maintenance burden, since it has to be updated whenever a
node tag is added or removed. Although in principle we could now
automate that, I see little justification for having such functionality
here at all. The function is only being applied to utility statements,
for which we already have infrastructure for obtaining string names.
Moreover, that infrastructure produces already-familiar-to-users names,
unlike nodetag_to_string().
So, remove this function and use the existing infrastructure instead.
That saves over a thousand lines of largely-unreachable code.
Back-patch to v15 where this code came in. Although it seems unlikely
that v15's nodetag list will change anymore, we might as well keep the
two branches looking and acting alike; otherwise back-patching any
test-results changes in this area will be painful.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/843818.1659218928@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code tried to access ARR_DIMS(v)[0] and ARR_LBOUND(v)[0]
whether or not those values exist. This made the range check
on the "n" argument unstable --- it might or might not fail, and
if it did it would report garbage for the allowed upper limit.
These bogus accesses would probably annoy Valgrind, and if you
were very unlucky even lead to SIGSEGV.
Report and fix by Martin Kalcher. Back-patch to v14 where this
function was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/baaeb413-b8a8-4656-5757-ef347e5ec11f@aboutsource.net
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These flavors of ALTER TABLE were already shaped to report the
ObjectAddress of the partition attached or detached, but this data was
not added to what is collected for event triggers. The tests of
test_ddl_deparse are updated to show the modification in the data
reported.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Amit Kapila, Hayato Kuroda, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB571626984BD099DADF53F38394899@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This module is expanded to track the description of the objects changed
in the subcommands of ALTER TABLE by reworking the function
get_altertable_subcmdtypes() (now named get_altertable_subcmdinfo) used
in the event trigger of the test. It now returns a set of rows made of
(subcommand type, object description) instead of a text array with only
the information about the subcommand type.
The tests have been lacking a lot of the subcommands added to
AlterTableType over the years. All the missing subcommands are added,
and the code is now structured so as the addition of a new subcommand
is detected by removing the default clause used in the switch for the
subcommand types.
The coverage of the module is increased from roughly 30% to 50%. More
could be done but this is already a nice improvement.
Author: Michael Paquier, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Amit Kapila, Hayato Kuroda
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB571626984BD099DADF53F38394899@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a test case that exercises the "buffering build" code path.
This covers almost all the non-error-case lines in gistbuild.c
and gistbuildbuffers.c.
Matheus Alcantara, based on earlier work by Pavel Borisov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3z8Fde-IHbW57a7bEZtaf19f4YOCWu67IZoWJoGW18rKD9R16ZHHchf4d7KFI3Yg7-0N4NonFuwKEgh98HjMCZYoVx7KOioPo6Wn2nZRpf4=@pm.me
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's allowed for an installation to remove postgresql.auto.conf,
so don't rely on that being present. Instead probe whether we can
read postmaster.pid. (If you've removed that, you broke the data
directory's multiple-postmaster interlock, not to mention pg_ctl.)
Per gripe from Michael Paquier.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YuSZTsoBMObyY+vT@paquier.xyz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new test is from commit 9e4f914b5e.
With this setting messages have SQL error numbers included, so that
needs to be provided for in the pattern looked for.
|
