| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Tests for normal and prepared transactions
Author: Nikhil Sontakke, placed in new test file by me
|
| |
|
|
| |
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, maybe_start_bgworker() would launch at most one bgworker
process per call, on the grounds that the postmaster might otherwise
neglect its other duties for too long. However, that seems overly
conservative, especially since bad effects only become obvious when
many hundreds of bgworkers need to be launched at once. On the other
side of the coin is that the existing logic could result in substantial
delay of bgworker launches, because ServerLoop isn't guaranteed to
iterate immediately after a signal arrives. (My attempt to fix that
by using pselect(2) encountered too many portability question marks,
and in any case could not help on platforms without pselect().)
One could also question the wisdom of using an O(N^2) processing
method if the system is intended to support so many bgworkers.
As a compromise, allow that function to launch up to 100 bgworkers
per call (and in consequence, rename it to maybe_start_bgworkers).
This will allow any normal parallel-query request for workers
to be satisfied immediately during sigusr1_handler, avoiding the
question of whether ServerLoop will be able to launch more promptly.
There is talk of rewriting the postmaster to use a WaitEventSet to
avoid the signal-response-delay problem, but I'd argue that this change
should be kept even after that happens (if it ever does).
Backpatch to 9.6 where parallel query was added. The issue exists
before that, but previous uses of bgworkers typically aren't as
sensitive to how quickly they get launched.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4707.1493221358@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Our general rule for pg_get_X(oid) functions is to simply return NULL
when passed an invalid or inappropriate OID. Teach pg_get_partkeydef to
do this also, making it easier for users to use this function when
querying against tables with both partitions and non-partitions (such as
pg_class).
As a concrete example, this makes pg_dump's life a little easier.
Author: Amit Langote
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Smarter compilers can see that "slot" can't be used uninitialized,
but some popular ones cannot. Noted by Jeff Janes.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Publisher relation can be incorrectly chosen, if there are more than
one relation in different schemas with the same name.
Author: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Author: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Author: Masahiko Sawada
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code was originally written with assumption that launcher is the
only process starting the worker. However that hasn't been true since
commit 7c4f52409 which failed to modify the worker management code
adequately.
This patch adds an in_use field to the LogicalRepWorker struct to
indicate whether the worker slot is being used and uses proper locking
everywhere this flag is set or read.
However if the parent process dies while the new worker is starting and
the new worker fails to attach to shared memory, this flag would never
get cleared. We solve this rare corner case by adding a sort of garbage
collector for in_use slots. This uses another field in the
LogicalRepWorker struct named launch_time that contains the time when
the worker was started. If any request to start a new worker does not
find free slot, we'll check for workers that were supposed to start but
took too long to actually do so, and reuse their slot.
In passing also fix possible race conditions when stopping a worker that
hasn't finished starting yet.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is no need to forbid ALTER TABLE ONLY on partitioned tables,
when no partitions exist yet. This can be handy for users who are
building up their partitioned table independently and will create actual
partitions later.
In addition, this is how pg_dump likes to operate in certain instances.
Author: Amit Langote, with some error message word-smithing by me
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Otherwise one would have to wait up to DEFAULT_NAPTIME_PER_CYCLE until
the subscription worker is considered for starting.
There is a small race condition: If one enables a subscription right
after disabling it, the launcher might not have registered the stopping
when receiving the wakeup signal for the re-enabling. The start will
then not happen right away but after the full cycle time.
Author: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In quorum-based synchronous replication, all the standbys listed in
synchronous_standby_names equally have chances to be chosen
as synchronous standbys. So they should have the same priority.
However, previously, quorum standbys whose names appear earlier
in the list were given higher priority values though the difference of
those priority values didn't affect the selection of synchronous standbys.
Users could see those "meaningless" priority values in pg_stat_replication
and this was confusing.
This commit gives all the quorum synchronous standbys the same
highest priority, i.e., 1, in order to remove such confusion.
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwEKOw=SmPLxJzkBsH6wwDBgOnVz46QjHbtsiZ-d-2RGUg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 5dfc198146b49ce7ecc8a1fc9d5e171fb75f6ba5 removed the only
existing caller of hash_freeze, but left behind a comment indicating
that hash_freeze was still used. Adjust.
Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20170424.165541.230634914.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit also fixes copyright line missed by the automated script.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
loop."
This reverts commit 81069a9efc5a374dd39874a161f456f0fb3afba4.
Buildfarm results suggest that some platforms have versions of pselect(2)
that are not merely non-atomic, but flat out non-functional. Revert the
use-pselect patch to confirm this diagnosis (and exclude the no-SA_RESTART
patch as the source of trouble). If it's so, we should probably look into
blacklisting specific platforms that have broken pselect.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9696.1493072081@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Traditionally we've unblocked signals, called select(2), and then blocked
signals again. The code expects that the select() will be cancelled with
EINTR if an interrupt occurs; but there's a race condition, which is that
an already-pending signal will be delivered as soon as we unblock, and then
when we reach select() there will be nothing preventing it from waiting.
This can result in a long delay before we perform any action that
ServerLoop was supposed to have taken in response to the signal. As with
the somewhat-similar symptoms fixed by commit 893902085, the main practical
problem is slow launching of parallel workers. The window for trouble is
usually pretty short, corresponding to one iteration of ServerLoop; but
it's not negligible.
To fix, use pselect(2) in place of select(2) where available, as that's
designed to solve exactly this problem. Where not available, we continue
to use the old way, and are no worse off than before.
pselect(2) has been required by POSIX since about 2001, so most modern
platforms should have it. A bigger portability issue is that some
implementations are said to be non-atomic, ie pselect() isn't really
any different from unblock/select/reblock. Still, we're no worse off
than before on such a platform.
There is talk of rewriting the postmaster to use a WaitEventSet and
not do signal response work in signal handlers, at which point this
could be reverted, since we'd be using a self-pipe to solve the race
condition. But that's not happening before v11 at the earliest.
Back-patch to 9.6. The problem exists much further back, but the
worst symptom arises only in connection with parallel query, so it
does not seem worth taking any portability risks in older branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9205.1492833041@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The postmaster keeps signals blocked everywhere except while waiting
for something to happen in ServerLoop(). The code expects that the
select(2) will be cancelled with EINTR if an interrupt occurs; without
that, followup actions that should be performed by ServerLoop() itself
will be delayed. However, some platforms interpret the SA_RESTART
signal flag as meaning that they should restart rather than cancel
the select(2). Worse yet, some of them restart it with the original
timeout delay, meaning that a steady stream of signal interrupts can
prevent ServerLoop() from iterating at all if there are no incoming
connection requests.
Observable symptoms of this, on an affected platform such as HPUX 10,
include extremely slow parallel query startup (possibly as much as
30 seconds) and failure to update timestamps on the postmaster's sockets
and lockfiles when no new connections arrive for a long time.
We can fix this by running the postmaster's signal handlers without
SA_RESTART. That would be quite a scary change if the range of code
where signals are accepted weren't so tiny, but as it is, it seems
safe enough. (Note that postmaster children do, and must, reset all
the handlers before unblocking signals; so this change should not
affect any child process.)
There is talk of rewriting the postmaster to use a WaitEventSet and
not do signal response work in signal handlers, at which point it might
be appropriate to revert this patch. But that's not happening before
v11 at the earliest.
Back-patch to 9.6. The problem exists much further back, but the
worst symptom arises only in connection with parallel query, so it
does not seem worth taking any portability risks in older branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9205.1492833041@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Those extern declartions were mistakenly added by commit 7c4f52409.
Author: Petr Jelinek
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This corner case didn't behave nicely at all: the postmaster would
(partially) update its state as though the process had started
successfully, and be quite confused thereafter. Fix it to act
like the worker had crashed, instead.
In passing, refactor so that do_start_bgworker contains all the
state-change logic for bgworker launch, rather than just some of it.
Back-patch as far as 9.4. 9.3 contains similar logic, but it's just
enough different that I don't feel comfortable applying the patch
without more study; and the use of bgworkers in 9.3 was so small
that it doesn't seem worth the extra work.
transam/parallel.c is still entirely unprepared for the possibility
of bgworker startup failure, but that seems like material for a
separate patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4905.1492813727@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix machine-dependent sorting of column numbers. (Odd behavior
would only materialize for column numbers above 255, but that's
certainly legal.)
Fix poor choice of SQLSTATE for some errors, and improve error message
wording. (Notably, "is not a scalar type" is a totally misleading way
to explain "does not have a default btree opclass".)
Avoid taking AccessExclusiveLock on the associated relation during DROP
STATISTICS. That's neither necessary nor desirable, and it could easily
have put us into situations where DROP fails (compare commit 68ea2b7f9).
Adjust/improve comments.
David Rowley and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f-GmCfPvBbAEaM5xoVOaYdVgVN1gicALSoYQ77z-+vLbw@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
poll.h is mandated by Single Unix Spec v2, the usual baseline for
postgres on unix. None of the unixoid buildfarms animals has
sys/poll.h but not poll.h. Therefore there's not much point to test
for sys/poll.h's existence and include it optionally.
Author: Andres Freund, per suggestion from Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20505.1492723662@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This seems to be largely cosmetic, avoiding valgrind bleats and the
like. The uninitialized padding influences the CRC of the on-disk
entry, but because it's also used when verifying the CRC, that doesn't
cause spurious failures. Backpatch nonetheless.
It's a bit unfortunate that contrib/test_decoding/sql/replorigin.sql
doesn't exercise the checkpoint path, but checkpoints are fairly
expensive on weaker machines, and we'd have to stop/start for that to
be meaningful.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170422183123.w2jgiuxtts7qrqaq@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 9.5, where replication origins were introduced
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As reported by buildfarm animal skink / valgrind, some of the
variables weren't always initialized. To avoid further mishaps use
memset to ensure the entire entry is initialized.
Author: Petr Jelinek
Reported-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170422183123.w2jgiuxtts7qrqaq@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: none, code new in master
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
poll(2) is required by Single Unix Spec v2, the usual baseline for
postgres (leaving windows aside). There's not been any buildfarm
animals without poll(2) for a long while, leaving the select(2)
implementation to be largely untested.
On windows, including mingw, poll() is not available, but we have a
special case implementation for windows anyway.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170420003611.7r2sdvehesdyiz2i@alap3.anarazel.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Force overwriteOK = true while we investigate deeper fix
Proposed by Tom Lane as temporary measure, accepted by me
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug was masked by error in running 004_timeline_switch.pl that was
fixed recently in 7d68f2281a.
Detective work by Alvaro Herrera and Tom Lane
Author: Thomas Munro
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ProcessTwoPhaseBuffer (formerly StandbyRecoverPreparedTransactions)
mixed up the parent and child XIDs when calling SubTransSetParent to
record the transactions' relationship in pg_subtrans.
Remarkably, analysis by Simon Riggs suggests that this doesn't lead to
visible problems (at least, not in non-Assert builds). That might
explain why we'd not noticed it before. Nonetheless, it's surely wrong.
This code was born broken, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20110.1492905318@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
archive_command and restore_command need to refer to Windows paths, not
Msys virtual file system paths, as postgres is completely unaware of the
latter, so prefix them with the Windows path to the virtual file system
root. Clean psql and pg_recvlogical output of carriage returns.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PostgresNode blithely ignored the exit status of pg_ctl, and in general
made no effort to be sure that the server was running when it should be.
This caused it to miss server crashes, which is a serious shortcoming
in a test scaffold. Make it complain if pg_ctl fails, and modify the
start and stop logic to complain if the server doesn't start, or doesn't
stop, when expected.
Also, have it turn off the "restart_after_crash" configuration parameter
in created clusters, as bitter experience has shown that leaving that on
can mask crashes too.
We might at some point need variant functions that allow for, eg,
server start failure to be expected. But no existing test case appears
to want that, and it surely shouldn't be the default behavior.
Note that this *will* break the buildfarm, as it will expose known
bugs that the previous testing failed to. I'm committing it despite
that, to verify that we get the expected failures in the buildfarm
not just in manual testing.
Back-patch into 9.6 where PostgresNode was introduced. (The 9.6
branch is not expected to show any failures.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21432.1492886428@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Although the documentation for append_conf said clearly that it didn't
add a newline, many test authors seem to have forgotten that ... or maybe
they just consulted the example at the top of the POD documentation,
which clearly shows adding a config entry without bothering to add a
trailing newline. The worst part of that is that it works, as long as
you don't do it more than once, since the backend isn't picky about
whether config files end with newlines. So there's not a strong forcing
function reminding test authors not to do it like that. Upshot is that
this is a terribly fragile way to go about things, and there's at least
one existing test case that is demonstrably broken and not testing what
it thinks it is.
Let's just make append_conf append a newline, instead; that is clearly
way safer than the old definition.
I also cleaned up a few call sites that were unnecessarily ugly.
(I left things alone in places where it's plausible that additional
config lines would need to be added someday.)
Back-patch the change in append_conf itself to 9.6 where it was added,
as having a definitional inconsistency between branches would obviously
be pretty hazardous for back-patching TAP tests. The other changes are
just cosmetic and don't need to be back-patched.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19751.1492892376@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Ancient versions of Test::More don't support the note() function used in
some TAP tests, so we require the minimum version of the module that
does.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per buildfarm, the "#ifdef F_SETFD" removed in that commit actually
is needed on Windows, because fcntl() isn't available at all on that
platform, unless using Cygwin. We could perhaps spell it more like
"#ifdef HAVE_FCNTL", or "#ifndef WIN32", but it's not clear that
those choices are better.
It does seem that we don't need the bogus manual definition of
FD_CLOEXEC, though, so keep that change.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26254.1492805635@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The POSIX standard does not say that the success return value for
fcntl(F_SETFD) and fcntl(F_SETFL) is zero; it says only that it's not -1.
We had several calls that were making the stronger assumption. Adjust
them to test specifically for -1 for strict spec compliance.
The standard further leaves open the possibility that the O_NONBLOCK
flag bit is not the only active one in F_SETFL's argument. Formally,
therefore, one ought to get the current flags with F_GETFL and store
them back with only the O_NONBLOCK bit changed when trying to change
the nonblock state. In port/noblock.c, we were doing the full pushup
in pg_set_block but not in pg_set_noblock, which is just weird. Make
both of them do it properly, since they have little business making
any assumptions about the socket they're handed. The other places
where we're issuing F_SETFL are working with FDs we just got from
pipe(2), so it's reasonable to assume the FDs' properties are all
default, so I didn't bother adding F_GETFL steps there.
Also, while pg_set_block deserves some points for trying to do things
right, somebody had decided that it'd be even better to cast fcntl's
third argument to "long". Which is completely loony, because POSIX
clearly says the third argument for an F_SETFL call is "int".
Given the lack of field complaints, these missteps apparently are not
of significance on any common platforms. But they're still wrong,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30882.1492800880@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It doesn't make any immediate difference to PostgreSQL, but might as well
follow the standard, since one exists. (I looked at RFC 5803 earlier, but
didn't fully understand it back then.)
The new format uses Base64 instead of hex to encode StoredKey and
ServerKey, which makes the verifiers slightly smaller. Using the same
encoding for the salt and the keys also means that you only need one
encoder/decoder instead of two. Although we have code in the backend to
do both, we are talking about teaching libpq how to create SCRAM verifiers
for PQencodePassword(), and libpq doesn't currently have any code for hex
encoding.
Bump catversion, because this renders any existing SCRAM verifiers in
pg_authid invalid.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/351ba574-85ea-d9b8-9689-8c928dd0955d@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SUSv2 mandates that <fcntl.h> provide both F_SETFD and FD_CLOEXEC,
so it seems pretty unlikely that any platforms remain without those.
Remove the #ifdef-ery installed by commit 7627b91cd to see if the
buildfarm agrees.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21444.1492798101@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way a failure to synchronize the table list will not leave an
unused slot on the publisher.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Oversight in commit 818fd4a67. While at it, sync order of file list
in .gitignore with those in the Makefile.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 05cd12ed5 ("pg_ctl: Change default to wait for all actions")
was a tad sloppy about updating the documentation to match. The
documentation was also sorely in need of a copy-editing pass, having
been adjusted at different times by different people who took little
care to maintain consistency of style.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Give a more specific error message than "xyz is not a table".
Also document in CREATE PUBLICATION which kinds of relations are not
supported.
based on patch by Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 7c4f524 allowed walsender to execute normal SQL commands
to support table sync feature in logical replication. Previously
while log_statement caused such SQL commands to be logged,
log_replication_commands caused them to be logged, too.
That is, such SQL commands were logged twice unexpectedly
when those settings were both enabled.
This commit forces log_replication_commands to log only replication
commands, to prevent normal SQL commands from being logged twice.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In pg_subscription, subconninfo, subslotname, subsynccommit and
subpublications are expected not to be NULL. Therefore this patch
adds BKI_FORCE_NOT_NULL markings to them.
This patch is basically unnecessary unless the code has a bug which
wrongly sets either of those columns to NULL. But it's good to have
this as a safeguard.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's not safe to raise an error while holding spinlock. But previously
logical replication worker for table sync called the function which
reads the system catalog and may raise an error while it's holding
spinlock. Which could lead to the trouble where spinlock will never
be released and the server gets stuck infinitely.
Author: Petr Jelinek
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi and Fujii Masao
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
is_parallel_safe() supposed that the only relevant property of a SubPlan
was the parallel safety of the referenced subplan tree. This is wrong:
the testexpr or args subtrees might contain parallel-unsafe stuff, as
demonstrated by the test case added here. However, just recursing into the
subtrees fails in a different way: we'll typically find PARAM_EXEC Params
representing the subplan's output columns in the testexpr. The previous
coding supposed that any Param must be treated as parallel-restricted, so
that a naive attempt at fixing this disabled parallel pushdown of SubPlans
altogether. We must instead determine, for any visited Param, whether it
is one that would be computed by a surrounding SubPlan node; if so, it's
safe to push down along with the SubPlan node.
We might later be able to extend this logic to cope with Params used for
correlated subplans and other cases; but that's a task for v11 or beyond.
Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7064.1492022469@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Author: Masahiko Sawada, heavily modified by me
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwEKOw=SmPLxJzkBsH6wwDBgOnVz46QjHbtsiZ-d-2RGUg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since it appears that v10 is going to move the goalposts by some amount
in terms of where you can and can't invoke set-returning functions,
arrange for the executor's "set-valued function called in context that
cannot accept a set" errors to include a syntax position if possible,
pointing to the specific SRF that can't be called where it's located.
The main bit of infrastructure needed for this is to make the query source
text accessible in the executor; but it turns out that commit 4c728f382
already did that. We just need a new function executor_errposition()
modeled on parser_errposition(), and we're ready to rock.
While experimenting with this, I noted that the error position wasn't
properly reported if it occurred in a plpgsql FOR-over-query loop,
which turned out to be because SPI_cursor_open_internal wasn't providing
an error context callback during PortalStart. Fix that.
There's a whole lot more that could be done with this infrastructure
now that it's there, but this is not the right time in the development
cycle for that sort of work. Hence, resist the temptation to plaster
executor_errposition() calls everywhere ... for the moment.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5263.1492471571@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Be sure to reset the launcher's pid (LogicalRepCtx->launcher_pid) to 0
even when the launcher emits an error.
* Declare ApplyLauncherWakeup() as a static function because it's called
only in launcher.c.
* Previously IsBackendPId() was used to check whether the launcher's pid
was valid. IsBackendPid() was necessary because there was the bug where
the launcher's pid was not reset to 0. But now it's fixed, so IsBackendPid()
is not necessary and this patch removes it.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously DatumGetObjectId() was wrongly used for that.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reported offlist by hubert depesz lubaczewski.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per discussion, plain "scram" is confusing because we actually implement
SCRAM-SHA-256 rather than the original SCRAM that uses SHA-1 as the hash
algorithm. If we add support for SCRAM-SHA-512 or some other mechanism in
the SCRAM family in the future, that would become even more confusing.
Most of the internal files and functions still use just "scram" as a
shorthand for SCRMA-SHA-256, but I did change PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM to
PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256, as that could potentially be used by 3rd
party extensions that hook into the password-check hook.
Michael Paquier did this in an earlier version of the SCRAM patch set
already, but I didn't include that in the version that was committed.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fde71ff1-5858-90c8-99a9-1c2427e7bafb@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reported-by: Amit Langote
|
