aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Clean up error handling in pg_basebackup's walmethods.c.Tom Lane2021-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The error handling here was a mess, as a result of a fundamentally bad design (relying on errno to keep its value much longer than is safe to assume) as well as a lot of just plain sloppiness, both as to noticing errors at all and as to reporting the correct errno. Moreover, the recent addition of LZ4 compression broke things completely, because liblz4 doesn't use errno to report errors. To improve matters, keep the error state in the DirectoryMethodData or TarMethodData struct, and add a string field so we can handle cases that don't set errno. (The tar methods already had a version of this, but it can be done more efficiently since all these cases use a constant error string.) Make the dir and tar methods handle errors in basically identical ways, which they didn't before. This requires copying errno into the state struct in a lot of places, which is a bit tedious, but it has the virtue that we can get rid of ad-hoc code to save and restore errno in a number of places ... not to mention that it fixes other places that should've saved/restored errno but neglected to. In passing, fix some pointlessly static buffers to be ordinary local variables. There remains an issue about exactly how to handle errors from fsync(), but that seems like material for its own patch. While the LZ4 problems are new, all the rest of this is fixes for old bugs, so backpatch to v10 where walmethods.c was introduced. Patch by me; thanks to Michael Paquier for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1343113.1636489231@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Handle close() failures more robustly in pg_dump and pg_basebackup.Tom Lane2021-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Coverity complained that applying get_gz_error after a failed gzclose, as we did in one place in pg_basebackup, is unsafe. I think it's right: it's entirely likely that the call is touching freed memory. Change that to inspect errno, as we do for other gzclose calls. Also, be careful to initialize errno to zero immediately before any gzclose() call where we care about the error status. (There are some calls where we don't, because we already failed at some previous step.) This ensures that we don't get a misleadingly irrelevant error code if gzclose() fails in a way that doesn't set errno. We could work harder at that, but it looks to me like all such cases are basically can't-happen if we're not misusing zlib, so it's not worth the extra notational cruft that would be required. Also, fix several places that simply failed to check for close-time errors at all, mostly at some remove from the close or gzclose itself; and one place that did check but didn't bother to report the errno. Back-patch to v12. These mistakes are older than that, but between the frontend logging API changes that happened in v12 and the fact that frontend code can't rely on %m before that, the patch would need substantial revision to work in older branches. It doesn't quite seem worth the trouble given the lack of related field complaints. Patch by me; thanks to Michael Paquier for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1343113.1636489231@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Invalidate relcache when changing REPLICA IDENTITY index.Amit Kapila2021-11-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | When changing REPLICA IDENTITY INDEX to another one, the target table's relcache was not being invalidated. This leads to skipping update/delete operations during apply on the subscriber side as the columns required to search corresponding rows won't get logged. Author: Tang Haiying, Hou Zhijie Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira, Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 10 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB61133CA11630DAE45BC6AD95FB939@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
* Make psql's \password default to CURRENT_USER, not PQuser(conn).Tom Lane2021-11-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The documentation says plainly that \password acts on "the current user" by default. What it actually acted on, or tried to, was the username used to log into the current session. This is not the same thing if one has since done SET ROLE or SET SESSION AUTHENTICATION. Aside from the possible surprise factor, it's quite likely that the current role doesn't have permissions to set the password of the original role. To fix, use "SELECT CURRENT_USER" to get the role name to act on. (This syntax works with servers at least back to 7.0.) Also, in hopes of reducing confusion, include the role name that will be acted on in the password prompt. The discrepancy from the documentation makes this a bug, so back-patch to all supported branches. Patch by me; thanks to Nathan Bossart for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/747443.1635536754@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix memory overrun when querying pg_stat_slruMichael Paquier2021-11-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | pg_stat_get_slru() in pgstatfuncs.c would point to one element after the end of the array PgStat_SLRUStats when finishing to scan its entries. This had no direct consequences as no data from the extra memory area was read, but static analyzers would rightfully complain here. So let's be clean. While on it, this adds one regression test in the area reserved for system views. Reported-by: Alexander Kozhemyakin, via AddressSanitizer Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17280-37da556e86032070@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 13
* Report any XLogReadRecord() error in XlogReadTwoPhaseData().Noah Misch2021-11-11
| | | | | | | | | | Buildfarm members kittiwake and tadarida have witnessed errors at this site. The site discarded key facts. Back-patch to v10 (all supported versions). Reviewed by Michael Paquier and Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211107013157.GB790288@rfd.leadboat.com
* Fix buffer overrun in unicode string normalization with empty inputMichael Paquier2021-11-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PostgreSQL 13 and newer versions are directly impacted by that through the SQL function normalize(), which would cause a call of this function to write one byte past its allocation if using in input an empty string after recomposing the string with NFC and NFKC. Older versions (v10~v12) are not directly affected by this problem as the only code path using normalization is SASLprep in SCRAM authentication that forbids the case of an empty string, but let's make the code more robust anyway there so as any out-of-core callers of this function are covered. The solution chosen to fix this issue is simple, with the addition of a fast-exit path if the decomposed string is found as empty. This would only happen for an empty string as at its lowest level a codepoint would be decomposed as itself if it has no entry in the decomposition table or if it has a decomposition size of 0. Some tests are added to cover this issue in v13~. Note that an empty string has always been considered as normalized (grammar "IS NF[K]{C,D} NORMALIZED", through the SQL function is_normalized()) for all the operations allowed (NFC, NFD, NFKC and NFKD) since this feature has been introduced as of 2991ac5. This behavior is unchanged but some tests are added in v13~ to check after that. I have also checked "make normalization-check" in src/common/unicode/, while on it (works in 13~, and breaks in older stable branches independently of this commit). The release notes should just mention this commit for v13~. Reported-by: Matthijs van der Vleuten Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17277-0c527a373794e802@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 10
* Doc: improve protocol spec for logical replication Type messages.Tom Lane2021-11-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | protocol.sgml documented the layout for Type messages, but completely dropped the ball otherwise, failing to explain what they are, when they are sent, or what they're good for. While at it, do a little copy-editing on the description of Relation messages. In passing, adjust the comment for apply_handle_type() to make it clearer that we choose not to do anything when receiving a Type message, not that we think it has no use whatsoever. Per question from Stefen Hillman. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPgW8pMknK5pup6=T4a_UG=Cz80Rgp=KONqJmTdHfaZb0RvnFg@mail.gmail.com
* Fix instability in 026_overwrite_contrecord.pl test.Tom Lane2021-11-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | We've seen intermittent failures in this test on slower buildfarm machines, which I think can be explained by assuming that autovacuum emitted some additional WAL. Disable autovacuum to stabilize it. In passing, use stringwise not numeric comparison to compare WAL file names. Doesn't matter at present, but they are hex strings not decimal ... Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1372189.1636499287@sss.pgh.pa.us
* libpq: reject extraneous data after SSL or GSS encryption handshake.Tom Lane2021-11-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | libpq collects up to a bufferload of data whenever it reads data from the socket. When SSL or GSS encryption is requested during startup, any additional data received with the server's yes-or-no reply remained in the buffer, and would be treated as already-decrypted data once the encryption handshake completed. Thus, a man-in-the-middle with the ability to inject data into the TCP connection could stuff some cleartext data into the start of a supposedly encryption-protected database session. This could probably be abused to inject faked responses to the client's first few queries, although other details of libpq's behavior make that harder than it sounds. A different line of attack is to exfiltrate the client's password, or other sensitive data that might be sent early in the session. That has been shown to be possible with a server vulnerable to CVE-2021-23214. To fix, throw a protocol-violation error if the internal buffer is not empty after the encryption handshake. Our thanks to Jacob Champion for reporting this problem. Security: CVE-2021-23222
* Reject extraneous data after SSL or GSS encryption handshake.Tom Lane2021-11-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The server collects up to a bufferload of data whenever it reads data from the client socket. When SSL or GSS encryption is requested during startup, any additional data received with the initial request message remained in the buffer, and would be treated as already-decrypted data once the encryption handshake completed. Thus, a man-in-the-middle with the ability to inject data into the TCP connection could stuff some cleartext data into the start of a supposedly encryption-protected database session. This could be abused to send faked SQL commands to the server, although that would only work if the server did not demand any authentication data. (However, a server relying on SSL certificate authentication might well not do so.) To fix, throw a protocol-violation error if the internal buffer is not empty after the encryption handshake. Our thanks to Jacob Champion for reporting this problem. Security: CVE-2021-23214
* Fix typoAlvaro Herrera2021-11-08
| | | | | | | Introduced in 1d97d3d0867f. Co-authored-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/83641f59-d566-b33e-ef21-a272a98675aa@gmail.com
* Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut2021-11-08
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 027ff7dad8afb1a907cb4c59da4e13c3ace8d376
* Reset lastOverflowedXid on standby when neededAlexander Korotkov2021-11-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, lastOverflowedXid is never reset. It's just adjusted on new transactions known to be overflowed. But if there are no overflowed transactions for a long time, snapshots could be mistakenly marked as suboverflowed due to wraparound. This commit fixes this issue by resetting lastOverflowedXid when needed altogether with KnownAssignedXids. Backpatch to all supported versions. Reported-by: Stan Hu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMBWrQ%3DFp5UAsU_nATY7EMY7NHczG4-DTDU%3DmCvBQZAQ6wa2xQ%40mail.gmail.com Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Alexander Korotkov Reviewed-by: Stan Hu, Simon Riggs, Nikolay Samokhvalov, Andrey Borodin, Dmitry Dolgov
* Avoid crash in rare case of concurrent DROPAlvaro Herrera2021-11-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a role being dropped contains is referenced by catalog objects that are concurrently also being dropped, a crash can result while trying to construct the string that describes the objects. Suppress that by ignoring objects whose descriptions are returned as NULL. The majority of relevant codesites were already cautious about this already; we had just missed a couple. This is an old bug, so backpatch all the way back. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17126-21887f04508cb5c8@postgresql.org
* Update alternative expected output file.Heikki Linnakangas2021-11-03
| | | | | | | | Previous commit added a test to 'largeobject', but neglected the alternative expected output file 'largeobject_1.source'. Per failure on buildfarm animal 'hamerkop'. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/DBA08346-9962-4706-92D1-230EE5201C10@yesql.se
* Fix snapshot reference leak if lo_export fails.Heikki Linnakangas2021-11-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If lo_export() fails to open the target file or to write to it, it leaks the created LargeObjectDesc and its snapshot in the top-transaction context and resource owner. That's pretty harmless, it's a small leak after all, but it gives the user a "Snapshot reference leak" warning. Fix by using a short-lived memory context and no resource owner for transient LargeObjectDescs that are opened and closed within one function call. The leak is easiest to reproduce with lo_export() on a directory that doesn't exist, but in principle the other lo_* functions could also fail. Backpatch to all supported versions. Reported-by: Andrew B Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/32bf767a-2d65-71c4-f170-122f416bab7e@iki.fi
* Fix variable lifespan in ExecInitCoerceToDomain().Tom Lane2021-11-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | This undoes a mistake in 1ec7679f1: domainval and domainnull were meant to live across loop iterations, but they were incorrectly moved inside the loop. The effect was only to emit useless extra EEOP_MAKE_READONLY steps, so it's not a big deal; nonetheless, back-patch to v13 where the mistake was introduced. Ranier Vilela Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAqXuhbkaAp-sGH6dR6Nsq7v28_0TPexHOm6FiDYqwQD-w@mail.gmail.com
* Avoid O(N^2) behavior in SyncPostCheckpoint().Tom Lane2021-11-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | As in commits 6301c3ada and e9d9ba2a4, avoid doing repetitive list_delete_first() operations, since that would be expensive when there are many files waiting to be unlinked. This is a slightly larger change than in those cases. We have to keep the list state valid for calls to AbsorbSyncRequests(), so it's necessary to invent a "canceled" field instead of immediately deleting PendingUnlinkEntry entries. Also, because we might not be able to process all the entries, we need a new list primitive list_delete_first_n(). list_delete_first_n() is almost list_copy_tail(), but it modifies the input List instead of making a new copy. I found a couple of existing uses of the latter that could profitably use the new function. (There might be more, but the other callers look like they probably shouldn't overwrite the input List.) As before, back-patch to v13. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CD2F0E7F-9822-45EC-A411-AE56F14DEA9F@amazon.com
* Avoid some other O(N^2) hazards in list manipulation.Tom Lane2021-11-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | In the same spirit as 6301c3ada, fix some more places where we were using list_delete_first() in a loop and thereby risking O(N^2) behavior. It's not clear that the lists manipulated in these spots can get long enough to be really problematic ... but it's not clear that they can't, either, and the fixes are simple enough. As before, back-patch to v13. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CD2F0E7F-9822-45EC-A411-AE56F14DEA9F@amazon.com
* Handle XLOG_OVERWRITE_CONTRECORD in DecodeXLogOpAlvaro Herrera2021-11-01
| | | | | | | | | Failing to do so results in inability of logical decoding to process the WAL stream. Handle it by doing nothing. Backpatch all the way back. Reported-by: Petr Jelínek <petr.jelinek@enterprisedb.com>
* Preserve opclass parameters across REINDEX CONCURRENTLYMichael Paquier2021-11-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The opclass parameter Datums from the old index are fetched in the same way as for predicates and expressions, by grabbing them directly from the system catalogs. They are then copied into the new IndexInfo that will be used for the creation of the new copy. This caused the new index to be rebuilt with default parameters rather than the ones pre-defined by a user. The only way to get back a new index with correct opclass parameters would be to recreate a new index from scratch. The issue has been introduced by 911e702. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YX0CG/QpLXcPr8HJ@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 13
* Avoid O(N^2) behavior when the standby process releases many locks.Tom Lane2021-10-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When replaying a transaction that held many exclusive locks on the primary, a standby server's startup process would expend O(N^2) effort on manipulating the list of locks. This code was fine when written, but commit 1cff1b95a made repetitive list_delete_first() calls inefficient, as explained in its commit message. Fix by just iterating the list normally, and releasing storage only when done. (This'd be inadequate if we needed to recover from an error occurring partway through; but we don't.) Back-patch to v13 where 1cff1b95a came in. Nathan Bossart Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CD2F0E7F-9822-45EC-A411-AE56F14DEA9F@amazon.com
* Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2021e.Tom Lane2021-10-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | DST law changes in Fiji, Jordan, Palestine, and Samoa. Historical corrections for Barbados, Cook Islands, Guyana, Niue, Portugal, and Tonga. Also, the Pacific/Enderbury zone has been renamed to Pacific/Kanton. The following zones have been merged into nearby, more-populous zones whose clocks have agreed since 1970: Africa/Accra, America/Atikokan, America/Blanc-Sablon, America/Creston, America/Curacao, America/Nassau, America/Port_of_Spain, Antarctica/DumontDUrville, and Antarctica/Syowa.
* Improve contrib/amcheck's tests for CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.Tom Lane2021-10-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commits fdd965d07 and 3cd9c3b92 tested CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY by launching two separate pgbench runs concurrently. This was needed so that only a single client thread would run CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY, avoiding deadlock between two CICs. However, there's a better way, which is to use an advisory lock to prevent concurrent CICs. That's better in part because the test code is shorter and more readable, but mostly because it automatically scales things to launch an appropriate number of CICs relative to the number of INSERT transactions. As committed, typically half to three-quarters of the CIC transactions were pointless because the INSERT transactions had already stopped. In passing, remove background_pgbench, which was added to support these tests and isn't needed anymore. We can always put it back if we find a use for it later. Back-patch to v12; older pgbench versions lack the conditional-execution features needed for this method. Tom Lane and Andrey Borodin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/139687.1635277318@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix ordering of items in nbtree error message.Peter Geoghegan2021-10-27
| | | | | | Oversight in commit a5213adf. Backpatch: 13-, just like commit a5213adf.
* Further harden nbtree posting split code.Peter Geoghegan2021-10-27
| | | | | | | | | | | Add more defensive checks around posting list split code. These should detect corruption involving duplicate table TIDs earlier and more reliably than any existing check. Follow up to commit 8f72bbac. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkrSY_kjyd1_M5xJK1uM0govJXMxPn8JUSvwcUOiHuWVw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 13-, where nbtree deduplication was introduced.
* Clarify that --system reindexes system catalogs *only*Magnus Hagander2021-10-27
| | | | | | | | Make this more clear both in the help message and docs. Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier Backpatch-through: 9.6 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevEw6Je0WUFTLhPKOk4+BoBuDrE-fKw3N4ckqgDBMFu4paA@mail.gmail.com
* Reject huge_pages=on if shared_memory_type=sysv.Thomas Munro2021-10-26
| | | | | | | | | It doesn't work (it could, but hasn't been implemented). Back-patch to 12, where shared_memory_type arrived. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/163271880203.22789.1125998876173795966@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Fix CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY for the newest prepared transactions.Noah Misch2021-10-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The purpose of commit 8a54e12a38d1545d249f1402f66c8cde2837d97c was to fix this, and it sufficed when the PREPARE TRANSACTION completed before the CIC looked for lock conflicts. Otherwise, things still broke. As before, in a cluster having used CIC while having enabled prepared transactions, queries that use the resulting index can silently fail to find rows. It may be necessary to reindex to recover from past occurrences; REINDEX CONCURRENTLY suffices. Fix this for future index builds by making CIC wait for arbitrarily-recent prepared transactions and for ordinary transactions that may yet PREPARE TRANSACTION. As part of that, have PREPARE TRANSACTION transfer locks to its dummy PGPROC before it calls ProcArrayClearTransaction(). Back-patch to 9.6 (all supported versions). Andrey Borodin, reviewed (in earlier versions) by Andres Freund. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/01824242-AA92-4FE9-9BA7-AEBAFFEA3D0C@yandex-team.ru
* Avoid race in RelationBuildDesc() affecting CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.Noah Misch2021-10-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CIC and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY assume backends see their catalog changes no later than each backend's next transaction start. That failed to hold when a backend absorbed a relevant invalidation in the middle of running RelationBuildDesc() on the CIC index. Queries that use the resulting index can silently fail to find rows. Fix this for future index builds by making RelationBuildDesc() loop until it finishes without accepting a relevant invalidation. It may be necessary to reindex to recover from past occurrences; REINDEX CONCURRENTLY suffices. Back-patch to 9.6 (all supported versions). Noah Misch and Andrey Borodin, reviewed (in earlier versions) by Andres Freund. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210730022548.GA1940096@gust.leadboat.com
* Fix frontend version of sh_error() in simplehash.h.Tom Lane2021-10-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The code does not expect sh_error() to return, but the patch that made this header usable in frontend didn't get that memo. While here, plaster unlikely() on the tests that decide whether to invoke sh_error(), and add our standard copyright notice. Noted by Andres Freund. Back-patch to v13 where this frontend support came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0D54435C-1199-4361-9D74-2FBDCF8EA164@anarazel.de
* pg_dump: fix mis-dumping of non-global default privileges.Tom Lane2021-10-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Non-global default privilege entries should be dumped as-is, not made relative to the default ACL for their object type. This would typically only matter if one had revoked some on-by-default privileges in a global entry, and then wanted to grant them again in a non-global entry. Per report from Boris Korzun. This is an old bug, so back-patch to all supported branches. Neil Chen, test case by Masahiko Sawada Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/111621616618184@mail.yandex.ru Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA3qoJnr2+1dVJObNtfec=qW4Z0nz=A9+r5bZKoTSy5RDjskMw@mail.gmail.com
* Back-patch "Add parent table name in an error in reorderbuffer.c."Amit Kapila2021-10-21
| | | | | | | | | | | This was originally done in commit 5e77625b26 for 15 only, as a troubleshooting aid but multiple people showed interest in back-patching this. Author: Jeremy Schneider Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 9.6 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/808ed65b-994c-915a-361c-577f088b837f@amazon.com
* Protect against collation variations in testAlvaro Herrera2021-10-20
| | | | Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YW/MYdSRQZtPFBWR@paquier.xyz
* Fix build of MSVC with OpenSSL 3.0.0Michael Paquier2021-10-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The build scripts of Visual Studio would fail to detect properly a 3.0.0 build as the check on the second digit was failing. This is adjusted where needed, allowing the builds to complete. Note that the MSIs of OpenSSL mentioned in the documentation have not changed any library names for Win32 and Win64, making this change straight-forward. Reported-by: htalaco, via github Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YW5XKYkq6k7OtrFq@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 9.6
* Ensure correct lock level is used in ALTER ... RENAMEAlvaro Herrera2021-10-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 1b5d797cd4f7 intended to relax the lock level used to rename indexes, but inadvertently allowed *any* relation to be renamed with a lowered lock level, as long as the command is spelled ALTER INDEX. That's undesirable for other relation types, so retry the operation with the higher lock if the relation turns out not to be an index. After this fix, ALTER INDEX <sometable> RENAME will require access exclusive lock, which it didn't before. Author: Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com> Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reported-by: Onder Kalaci <onderk@microsoft.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/PH0PR21MB1328189E2821CDEC646F8178D8AE9@PH0PR21MB1328.namprd21.prod.outlook.com
* Adapt src/test/ldap/t/001_auth.pl to work with openldap 2.5.Andres Freund2021-10-19
| | | | | | | | | | | ldapsearch's deprecated -h/-p arguments were removed, need to use -H now - which has been around for over 20 years. As perltidy insists on reflowing the parameters anyway, change order and "phrasing" to yield a less confusing layout (per suggestion from Tom Lane). Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211009233850.wvr6apcrw2ai6cnj@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 11-, where the tests were added.
* Fix assignment to array of domain over composite.Tom Lane2021-10-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | An update such as "UPDATE ... SET fld[n].subfld = whatever" failed if the array elements were domains rather than plain composites. That's because isAssignmentIndirectionExpr() failed to cope with the CoerceToDomain node that would appear in the expression tree in this case. The result would typically be a crash, and even if we accidentally didn't crash, we'd not correctly preserve other fields of the same array element. Per report from Onder Kalaci. Back-patch to v11 where arrays of domains came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/PH0PR21MB132823A46AA36F0685B7A29AD8BD9@PH0PR21MB1328.namprd21.prod.outlook.com
* Remove bogus assertion in transformExpressionList().Tom Lane2021-10-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I think when I added this assertion (in commit 8f889b108), I was only thinking of the use of transformExpressionList at top level of INSERT and VALUES. But it's also called by transformRowExpr(), which can certainly occur in an UPDATE targetlist, so it's inappropriate to suppose that p_multiassign_exprs must be empty. Besides, since the input is not expected to contain ResTargets, there's no reason it should contain MultiAssignRefs either. Hence this code need not be concerned about the state of p_multiassign_exprs, and we should just drop the assertion. Per bug #17236 from ocean_li_996. It's been wrong for years, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17236-3210de9bcba1d7ca@postgresql.org
* Fix bug in TOC file error message printingDaniel Gustafsson2021-10-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the blob TOC file cannot be parsed, the error message was failing to print the filename as the variable holding it was shadowed by the destination buffer for parsing. When the filename fails to parse, the error will print an empty string: ./pg_restore -d foo -F d dump pg_restore: error: invalid line in large object TOC file "": .. ..instead of the intended error message: ./pg_restore -d foo -F d dump pg_restore: error: invalid line in large object TOC file "dump/blobs.toc": .. Fix by renaming both variables as the shared name was too generic to store either and still convey what the variable held. Backpatch all the way down to 9.6. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/A2B151F5-B32B-4F2C-BA4A-6870856D9BDE@yesql.se Backpatch-through: 9.6
* Fix sscanf limits in pg_basebackup and pg_dumpDaniel Gustafsson2021-10-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Make sure that the string parsing is limited by the size of the destination buffer. In pg_basebackup the available values sent from the server is limited to two characters so there was no risk of overflow. In pg_dump the buffer is bounded by MAXPGPATH, and thus the limit must be inserted via preprocessor expansion and the buffer increased by one to account for the terminator. There is no risk of overflow here, since in this case, the buffer scanned is smaller than the destination buffer. Backpatch the pg_basebackup fix to 11 where it was introduced, and the pg_dump fix all the way down to 9.6. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B14D3D7B-F98C-4E20-9459-C122C67647FB@yesql.se Backpatch-through: 11 and 9.6
* Block ALTER INDEX/TABLE index_name ALTER COLUMN colname SET (options)Michael Paquier2021-10-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The grammar of this command run on indexes with column names has always been authorized by the parser, and it has never been documented. Since 911e702, it is possible to define opclass parameters as of CREATE INDEX, which actually broke the old case of ALTER INDEX/TABLE where relation-level parameters n_distinct and n_distinct_inherited could be defined for an index (see 76a47c0 and its thread where this point has been touched, still remained unused). Attempting to do that in v13~ would cause the index to become unusable, as there is a new dedicated code path to load opclass parameters instead of the relation-level ones previously available. Note that it is possible to fix things with a manual catalog update to bring the relation back online. This commit disables this command for now as the use of column names for indexes does not make sense anyway, particularly when it comes to index expressions where names are automatically computed. One way to properly support this case properly in the future would be to use column numbers when it comes to indexes, in the same way as ALTER INDEX .. ALTER COLUMN .. SET STATISTICS. Partitioned indexes were already blocked, but not indexes. Some tests are added for both cases. There was some code in ANALYZE to enforce n_distinct to be used for an index expression if the parameter was defined, but just remove it for now until/if there is support for this (note that index-level parameters never had support in pg_dump either, previously), so this was just dead code. Reported-by: Matthijs van der Vleuten Author: Nathan Bossart, Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing, Dilip Kumar Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17220-15d684c6c2171a83@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 13
* Invalidate partitions of table being attached/detachedAlvaro Herrera2021-10-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Failing to do that, any direct inserts/updates of those partitions would fail to enforce the correct constraint, that is, one that considers the new partition constraint of their parent table. Backpatch to 10. Reported by: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS3PR01MB5718DA1C4609A25186D1FBF194089%40OS3PR01MB5718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
* Reset properly snapshot export state during transaction abortMichael Paquier2021-10-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | During a replication slot creation, an ERROR generated in the same transaction as the one creating a to-be-exported snapshot would have left the backend in an inconsistent state, as the associated static export snapshot state was not being reset on transaction abort, but only on the follow-up command received by the WAL sender that created this snapshot on replication slot creation. This would trigger inconsistency failures if this session tried to export again a snapshot, like during the creation of a replication slot. Note that a snapshot export cannot happen in a transaction block, so there is no need to worry resetting this state for subtransaction aborts. Also, this inconsistent state would very unlikely show up to users. For example, one case where this could happen is an out-of-memory error when building the initial snapshot to-be-exported. Dilip found this problem while poking at a different patch, that caused an error in this code path for reasons unrelated to HEAD. Author: Dilip Kumar Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Zhihong Yu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-s0zA1Kj0ozGHwkYkHwa5U0zUE94RSc_g81WrpcETB5=w@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 9.6
* Avoid core dump in pg_dump when dumping from pre-8.3 server.Tom Lane2021-10-16
| | | | | | Commit f0e21f2f6 missed adding a tgisinternal output column to getTriggers' query for pre-8.3 servers. Back-patch to v11, like that commit.
* Make pg_dump acquire lock on partitioned tables that are to be dumped.Tom Lane2021-10-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It was clearly the intent to do so all along, but the original coding fat-fingered this by checking the wrong array element. We fixed it in passing in 403a3d91c, but that later got reverted, and we forgot to keep this bug fix. Most of the time this'd be relatively harmless, since once we lock any of the partitioned table's leaf partitions, that would suffice to prevent major DDL on the partitioned table itself. However, a childless partitioned table would get dumped with no relevant lock whatsoever, possibly allowing dump failure or inconsistent output. Unlike 403a3d91c, there are no versioning concerns, since every server version that has partitioned tables will allow you to lock one. Back-patch to v10 where partitioned tables were introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1018205.1634346327@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Check criticalSharedRelcachesBuilt in GetSharedSecurityLabel().Jeff Davis2021-10-14
| | | | | | | | | | An extension may want to call GetSecurityLabel() on a shared object before the shared relcaches are fully initialized. For instance, a ClientAuthentication_hook might want to retrieve the security label on a role. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ecb7af0b26e3be1d96d291c8453a86f1f82d9061.camel@j-davis.com Backpatch-through: 9.6
* Fix planner error with pulling up subquery expressions into function RTEs.Tom Lane2021-10-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a function-in-FROM laterally references the output of some sub-SELECT earlier in the FROM clause, and we are able to flatten that sub-SELECT into the outer query, the expression(s) copied into the function RTE missed being processed by eval_const_expressions. This'd lead to trouble and probable crashes at execution if such expressions contained named-argument function call syntax or functions with defaulted arguments. The bug is masked if the query contains any explicit JOIN syntax, which may help explain why we'd not noticed. Per bug #17227 from Bernd Dorn. This is an oversight in commit 7266d0997, so back-patch to v13 where that came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17227-5a28ed1512189fa4@postgresql.org
* Change recently added test code for stabilityAlvaro Herrera2021-10-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The test code added with ff9f111bce24 fails under valgrind, and probably other slow cases too, because if (say) autovacuum runs in between and produces WAL of its own, the large INSERT fails to account for that in the LSN calculations. Rewrite to use a DO loop. Per complaint from Andres Freund Backpatch to all branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211013180338.5guyqzpkcisqugrl@alap3.anarazel.de