aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Fix coding rules violations in walreceiver.cAlvaro Herrera2017-10-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1. Since commit b1a9bad9e744 we had pstrdup() inside a spinlock-protected critical section; reported by Andreas Seltenreich. Turn those into strlcpy() to stack-allocated variables instead. Backpatch to 9.6. 2. Since commit 9ed551e0a4fd we had a pfree() uselessly inside a spinlock-protected critical section. Tom Lane noticed in code review. Move down. Backpatch to 9.6. 3. Since commit 64233902d22b we had GetCurrentTimestamp() (a kernel call) inside a spinlock-protected critical section. Tom Lane noticed in code review. Move it up. Backpatch to 9.2. 4. Since commit 1bb2558046cc we did elog(PANIC) while holding spinlock. Tom Lane noticed in code review. Release spinlock before dying. Backpatch to 9.2. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87h8vhtgj2.fsf@ansel.ydns.eu
* Stamp 10.0.REL_10_0Tom Lane2017-10-02
|
* Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut2017-10-02
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 4eb5acee0bc0ba7b40220367dfc44bb4af188c88
* Use a longer connection timeout in pg_isready test.Tom Lane2017-10-01
| | | | | | | | | | | Buildfarm members skink and sungazer have both recently failed this test, with symptoms indicating that the default 3-second timeout isn't quite enough for those very slow systems. There's no reason to be miserly with this timeout, so boost it to 60 seconds. Back-patch to all versions containing this test. That may be overkill, because the failure has only been observed in the v10 branch, but I don't feel like having to revisit this later.
* Fix busy-wait in pgbench, with --rate.Heikki Linnakangas2017-10-01
| | | | | | | | | | | If --rate was used to throttle pgbench, it failed to sleep when it had nothing to do, leading to a busy-wait with 100% CPU usage. This bug was introduced in the refactoring in v10. Before that, sleep() was called with a timeout, even when there were no file descriptors to wait for. Reported by Jeff Janes, patch by Fabien COELHO. Backpatch to v10. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMkU%3D1x5hoX0pLLKPRnXCy0T8uHoDvXdq%2B7kAM9eoC9_z72ucw%40mail.gmail.com
* Fix inadequate locking during get_rel_oids().Tom Lane2017-09-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get_rel_oids used to not take any relation locks at all, but that stopped being a good idea with commit 3c3bb9933, which inserted a syscache lookup into the function. A concurrent DROP TABLE could now produce "cache lookup failed", which we don't want to have happen in normal operation. The best solution seems to be to transiently take a lock on the relation named by the RangeVar (which also makes the result of RangeVarGetRelid a lot less spongy). But we shouldn't hold the lock beyond this function, because we don't want VACUUM to lock more than one table at a time. (That would not be a big problem right now, but it will become one after the pending feature patch to allow multiple tables to be named in VACUUM.) In passing, adjust vacuum_rel and analyze_rel to document that we don't trust the passed RangeVar to be accurate, and allow the RangeVar to possibly be NULL --- which it is anyway for a whole-database VACUUM, though we accidentally didn't crash for that case. The passed RangeVar is in fact inaccurate when dealing with a child partition, as of v10, and it has been wrong for a whole long time in the case of vacuum_rel() recursing to a TOAST table. None of these things present visible bugs up to now, because the passed RangeVar is in fact only consulted for autovacuum logging, and in that particular context it's always accurate because autovacuum doesn't let vacuum.c expand partitions nor recurse to toast tables. Still, this seems like trouble waiting to happen, so let's nail the door at least partly shut. (Further cleanup is planned, in HEAD only, as part of the pending feature patch.) Fix some sadly inaccurate/obsolete comments too. Back-patch to v10. Michael Paquier and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25023.1506107590@sss.pgh.pa.us
* pgbench: If we fail to send a command to the server, fail.Robert Haas2017-09-29
| | | | | | | | | | | This beats the old behavior of busy-waiting hands down. Oversight in commit 12788ae49e1933f463bc59a6efe46c4a01701b76. Report by Pavan Deolasee. Patch by Fabien Coelho. Reviewed by Pavan Deolasee. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CABOikdPhfXTypckMC1Ux6Ko+hKBWwUBA=EXsvamXYSg8M9J94w@mail.gmail.com
* psql: Update \d sequence displayPeter Eisentraut2017-09-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For \d sequencename, the psql code just did SELECT * FROM sequencename to get the information to display, but this does not contain much interesting information anymore in PostgreSQL 10, because the metadata has been moved to a separate system catalog. This patch creates a newly designed sequence display that is not merely an extension of the general relation/table display as it was previously. Example: PostgreSQL 9.6: => \d foobar Sequence "public.foobar" Column | Type | Value ---------------+---------+--------------------- sequence_name | name | foobar last_value | bigint | 1 start_value | bigint | 1 increment_by | bigint | 1 max_value | bigint | 9223372036854775807 min_value | bigint | 1 cache_value | bigint | 1 log_cnt | bigint | 0 is_cycled | boolean | f is_called | boolean | f PostgreSQL 10 before this change: => \d foobar Sequence "public.foobar" Column | Type | Value ------------+---------+------- last_value | bigint | 1 log_cnt | bigint | 0 is_called | boolean | f New: => \d foobar Sequence "public.foobar" Type | Start | Minimum | Maximum | Increment | Cycles? | Cache --------+-------+---------+---------------------+-----------+---------+------- bigint | 1 | 1 | 9223372036854775807 | 1 | no | 1 Reviewed-by: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
* Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tupleAlvaro Herrera2017-09-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Vacuum calls page-level HOT prune to remove dead HOT tuples before doing liveness checks (HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum) on the remaining tuples. But concurrent transaction commit/abort may turn DEAD some of the HOT tuples that survived the prune, before HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum tests them. This happens to activate the code that decides to freeze the tuple ... which resuscitates it, duplicating data. (This is especially bad if there's any unique constraints, because those are now internally violated due to the duplicate entries, though you won't know until you try to REINDEX or dump/restore the table.) One possible fix would be to simply skip doing anything to the tuple, and hope that the next HOT prune would remove it. But there is a problem: if the tuple is older than freeze horizon, this would leave an unfrozen XID behind, and if no HOT prune happens to clean it up before the containing pg_clog segment is truncated away, it'd later cause an error when the XID is looked up. Fix the problem by having the tuple freezing routines cope with the situation: don't freeze the tuple (and keep it dead). In the cases that the XID is older than the freeze age, set the HEAP_XMAX_COMMITTED flag so that there is no need to look up the XID in pg_clog later on. An isolation test is included, authored by Michael Paquier, loosely based on Daniel Wood's original reproducer. It only tests one particular scenario, though, not all the possible ways for this problem to surface; it be good to have a more reliable way to test this more fully, but it'd require more work. In message https://postgr.es/m/20170911140103.5akxptyrwgpc25bw@alvherre.pgsql I outlined another test case (more closely matching Dan Wood's) that exposed a few more ways for the problem to occur. Backpatch all the way back to 9.3, where this problem was introduced by multixact juggling. In branches 9.3 and 9.4, this includes a backpatch of commit e5ff9fefcd50 (of 9.5 era), since the original is not correctable without matching the coding pattern in 9.5 up. Reported-by: Daniel Wood Diagnosed-by: Daniel Wood Reviewed-by: Yi Wen Wong, Michaƫl Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E5711E62-8FDF-4DCA-A888-C200BF6B5742@amazon.com
* Fix behavior when converting a float infinity to numeric.Tom Lane2017-09-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | float8_numeric() and float4_numeric() failed to consider the possibility that the input is an IEEE infinity. The results depended on the platform-specific behavior of sprintf(): on most platforms you'd get something like ERROR: invalid input syntax for type numeric: "inf" but at least on Windows it's possible for the conversion to succeed and deliver a finite value (typically 1), due to a nonstandard output format from sprintf and lack of syntax error checking in these functions. Since our numeric type lacks the concept of infinity, a suitable conversion is impossible; the best thing to do is throw an explicit error before letting sprintf do its thing. While at it, let's use snprintf not sprintf. Overrunning the buffer should be impossible if sprintf does what it's supposed to, but this is cheap insurance against a stack smash if it doesn't. Problem reported by Taiki Kondo. Patch by me based on fix suggestion from KaiGai Kohei. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12A9442FBAE80D4E8953883E0B84E088C8C7A2@BPXM01GP.gisp.nec.co.jp
* Revert to 9.6 treatment of ALTER TYPE enumtype ADD VALUE.Tom Lane2017-09-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 15bc038f9, along with the followon commits 1635e80d3 and 984c92074 that tried to clean up the problems exposed by bug #14825. The result was incomplete because it failed to address parallel-query requirements. With 10.0 release so close upon us, now does not seem like the time to be adding more code to fix that. I hope we can un-revert this code and add the missing parallel query support during the v11 cycle. Back-patch to v10. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170922185904.1448.16585@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Improve wording of error message added in commit 714805010.Tom Lane2017-09-26
| | | | | | | Per suggestions from Peter Eisentraut and David Johnston. Back-patch, like the previous commit. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dv9jI-0006oT-Fn@gemulon.postgresql.org
* Fix failure-to-read-man-page in commit 899bd785c.Tom Lane2017-09-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | posix_fallocate() is not quite a drop-in replacement for fallocate(), because it is defined to return the error code as its function result, not in "errno". I (tgl) missed this because RHEL6's version seems to set errno as well. That is not the case on more modern Linuxen, though, as per buildfarm results. Aside from fixing the return-convention confusion, remove the test for ENOSYS; we expect that glibc will mask that for posix_fallocate, though it does not for fallocate. Keep the test for EINTR, because POSIX specifies that as a possible result, and buildfarm results suggest that it can happen in practice. Back-patch to 9.4, like the previous commit. Thomas Munro Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1002664500.12301802.1471008223422.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
* Remove heuristic same-transaction test from check_safe_enum_use().Tom Lane2017-09-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The blacklist mechanism added by the preceding commit directly fixes most of the practical cases that the same-transaction test was meant to cover. What remains is use-cases like begin; create type e as enum('x'); alter type e add value 'y'; -- use 'y' somehow commit; However, because the same-transaction test is heuristic, it fails on small variants of that, such as renaming the type or changing its owner. Rather than try to explain the behavior to users, let's remove it and just have a rule that the newly added value can't be used before being committed, full stop. Perhaps later it will be worth the implementation effort and overhead to have a more accurate test for type-was-created-in-this-transaction. We'll wait for some field experience with v10 before deciding to do that. Back-patch to v10. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170922185904.1448.16585@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Use a blacklist to distinguish original from add-on enum values.Tom Lane2017-09-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 15bc038f9 allowed ALTER TYPE ADD VALUE to be executed inside transaction blocks, by disallowing the use of the added value later in the same transaction, except under limited circumstances. However, the test for "limited circumstances" was heuristic and could reject references to enum values that were created during CREATE TYPE AS ENUM, not just later. This breaks the use-case of restoring pg_dump scripts in a single transaction, as reported in bug #14825 from Balazs Szilfai. We can improve this by keeping a "blacklist" table of enum value OIDs created by ALTER TYPE ADD VALUE during the current transaction. Any visible-but-uncommitted value whose OID is not in the blacklist must have been created by CREATE TYPE AS ENUM, and can be used safely because it could not have a lifespan shorter than its parent enum type. This change also removes the restriction that a renamed enum value can't be used before being committed (unless it was on the blacklist). Andrew Dunstan, with cosmetic improvements by me. Back-patch to v10. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170922185904.1448.16585@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Handle heap rewrites better in logical replicationPeter Eisentraut2017-09-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A FOR ALL TABLES publication naturally considers all base tables to be a candidate for replication. This includes transient heaps that are created during a table rewrite during DDL. This causes failures on the subscriber side because it will not have a table like pg_temp_16386 to receive data (and if it did, it would be the wrong table). The prevent this problem, we filter out any tables that match this naming pattern and match an actual table from FOR ALL TABLES publications. This is only a heuristic, meaning that user tables that match that naming could accidentally be omitted. A more robust solution might require an explicit marking of such tables in pg_class somehow. Reported-by: yxq <yxq@o2.pl> Bug: #14785 Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
* Avoid SIGBUS on Linux when a DSM memory request overruns tmpfs.Tom Lane2017-09-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | On Linux, shared memory segments created with shm_open() are backed by swap files created in tmpfs. If the swap file needs to be extended, but there's no tmpfs space left, you get a very unfriendly SIGBUS trap. To avoid this, force allocation of the full request size when we create the segment. This adds a few cycles, but none that we wouldn't expend later anyway, assuming the request isn't hugely bigger than the actual need. Make this code #ifdef __linux__, because (a) there's not currently a reason to think the same problem exists on other platforms, and (b) applying posix_fallocate() to an FD created by shm_open() isn't very portable anyway. Back-patch to 9.4 where the DSM code came in. Thomas Munro, per a bug report from Amul Sul Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1002664500.12301802.1471008223422.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
* Support building with Visual Studio 2017Andrew Dunstan2017-09-25
| | | | | | Haribabu Kommi, reviewed by Takeshi Ideriha and Christian Ullrich Backpatch to 9.6
* Allow ICU to use SortSupport on Windows with UTF-8Peter Eisentraut2017-09-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | There is no reason to ever prevent the use of SortSupport on Windows when ICU locales are used. We previously avoided SortSupport on Windows with UTF-8 server encoding and a non C-locale due to restrictions in Windows' libc functionality. This is now considered to be a restriction in one platform's libc collation provider, and not a more general platform restriction. Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
* Fix pg_basebackup test to original intentPeter Eisentraut2017-09-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | One test case was meant to check that pg_basebackup does not succeed when a slot is specified with -S but WAL streaming is not selected, which used to require specifying -X stream. Since -X stream is the default in PostgreSQL 10, this test case no longer covers that meaning, but the pg_basebackup invocation happened to fail anyway for the unrelated reason that the specified replication slot does not exist. To fix, move the test case to later in the file where the slot does exist, and add -X none to the invocation so that it covers the originally meant behavior. extracted from a patch by Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
* Fix saving and restoring umaskPeter Eisentraut2017-09-23
| | | | | | In two cases, we set a different umask for some piece of code and restore it afterwards. But if the contained code errors out, the umask is not restored. So add TRY/CATCH blocks to fix that.
* Test BRIN autosummarizationAlvaro Herrera2017-09-23
| | | | | | | | There was no coverage for this code. Reported-by: Nikolay Shaplov, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2700647.XEouBYNZic@x200m https://postgr.es/m/13849.1506114543@sss.pgh.pa.us
* For wal_consistency_checking, mask page checksum as well as page LSN.Robert Haas2017-09-22
| | | | | | | | If the LSN is different, the checksum will be different, too. Ashwin Agrawal, reviewed by Michael Paquier and Kuntal Ghosh Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CALfoeis5iqrAU-+JAN+ZzXkpPr7+-0OAGv7QUHwFn=-wDy4o4Q@mail.gmail.com
* Fix build with !USE_WIDE_UPPER_LOWERPeter Eisentraut2017-09-22
| | | | | | | | The placement of the ifdef blocks in formatting.c was pretty bogus, so the code failed to compile if USE_WIDE_UPPER_LOWER was not defined. Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Reported-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
* Sync our copy of the timezone library with IANA tzcode master.Tom Lane2017-09-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch absorbs a few unreleased fixes in the IANA code. It corresponds to commit 2d8b944c1cec0808ac4f7a9ee1a463c28f9cd00a in https://github.com/eggert/tz. Non-cosmetic changes include: TZDEFRULESTRING is updated to match current US DST practice, rather than what it was over ten years ago. This only matters for interpretation of POSIX-style zone names (e.g., "EST5EDT"), and only if the timezone database doesn't include either an exact match for the zone name or a "posixrules" entry. The latter should not be true in any current Postgres installation, but this could possibly matter when using --with-system-tzdata. Get rid of a nonportable use of "++var" on a bool var. This is part of a larger fix that eliminates some vestigial support for consecutive leap seconds, and adds checks to the "zic" compiler that the data files do not specify that. Remove a couple of ancient compatibility hacks. The IANA crew think these are obsolete, and I tend to agree. But perhaps our buildfarm will think different. Back-patch to all supported branches, in line with our policy that all branches should be using current IANA code. Before v10, this includes application of current pgindent rules, to avoid whitespace problems in future back-patches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dsWhf-0000pT-F9@gemulon.postgresql.org
* Give a better error for duplicate entries in VACUUM/ANALYZE column list.Tom Lane2017-09-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, the code didn't think about this case and would just try to analyze such a column twice. That would fail at the point of inserting the second version of the pg_statistic row, with obscure error messsages like "duplicate key value violates unique constraint" or "tuple already updated by self", depending on context and PG version. We could allow the case by ignoring duplicate column specifications, but it seems better to reject it explicitly. The bogus error messages seem like arguably a bug, so back-patch to all supported versions. Nathan Bossart, per a report from Michael Paquier, and whacked around a bit by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E061A8E3-5E3D-494D-94F0-E8A9B312BBFC@amazon.com
* Improve dubious memory management in pg_newlocale_from_collation().Tom Lane2017-09-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | pg_newlocale_from_collation() used malloc() and strdup() directly, which is generally not per backend coding style, and it didn't bother to check for failure results, but would just SIGSEGV instead. Also, if one of the numerous error checks in the middle of the function failed, the already-allocated memory would be leaked permanently. Admittedly, it's not a lot of memory, but it could build up if this function were called repeatedly for a bad collation. The first two problems are easily cured by palloc'ing in TopMemoryContext instead of calling libc directly. We can fairly easily dodge the leakage problem for the struct pg_locale_struct by filling in a temporary variable and allocating permanent storage only once we reach the bottom of the function. It's harder to get rid of the potential leakage for ICU's copy of the collcollate string, but at least that's only allocated after most of the error checks; so live with that aspect. Back-patch to v10 where this code came in, with one or another of the ICU patches.
* Fix instability in subscription regression test.Tom Lane2017-09-20
| | | | | | | | | | | 005_encoding.pl neglected to wait for the subscriber's initial synchronization to happen. While we have not seen this fail in the buildfarm, it's pretty easy to demonstrate there's an issue by hacking logicalrep_worker_launch() to fail most of the time. Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/27032.1505749806@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Stamp 10rc1.REL_10_RC1Tom Lane2017-09-18
|
* Fixed ECPG to correctly handle out-of-scope cursor declarations with pointersMichael Meskes2017-09-18
| | | | or array variables.
* Fix, or at least ameliorate, bugs in logicalrep_worker_launch().Tom Lane2017-09-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If we failed to get a background worker slot, the code just walked away from the logicalrep-worker slot it already had, leaving that looking like the worker is still starting up. This led to an indefinite hang in subscription startup, as reported by Thomas Munro. We must release the slot on failure. Also fix a thinko: we must capture the worker slot's generation before releasing LogicalRepWorkerLock the first time, else testing to see if it's changed is pretty meaningless. BTW, the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in WaitForReplicationWorkerAttach is a ticking time bomb, even without considering the possibility of elog(ERROR) in one of the other functions it calls. Really, this entire business needs a redesign with some actual thought about error recovery. But for now I'm just band-aiding the case observed in testing. Back-patch to v10 where this code was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2bP3TBMFBArP6o20AZaRduWjMnjCjt22hSdnA-EvrtCw@mail.gmail.com
* Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut2017-09-18
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: ba86fd34c722d76964b1b1fcf14ea18435172529
* Fix DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangPeter Eisentraut2017-09-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When ALTER SUBSCRIPTION DISABLE is run in the same transaction before DROP SUBSCRIPTION, the latter will hang because workers will still be running, not having seen the DISABLE committed, and DROP SUBSCRIPTION will wait until the workers have vacated the replication origin slots. Previously, DROP SUBSCRIPTION killed the logical replication workers immediately only if it was going to drop the replication slot, otherwise it scheduled the worker killing for the end of the transaction, as a result of 7e174fa793a2df89fe03d002a5087ef67abcdde8. This, however, causes the present problem. To fix, kill the workers immediately in all cases. This covers all cases: A subscription that doesn't have a replication slot must be disabled. It was either disabled in the same transaction, or it was already disabled before the current transaction, but then there shouldn't be any workers left and this won't make a difference. Reported-by: Arseny Sher <a.sher@postgrespro.ru> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/87mv6av84w.fsf%40ars-thinkpad
* Allow rel_is_distinct_for() to look through RelabelType below OpExpr.Tom Lane2017-09-17
| | | | | | | | | This lets it do the right thing for, eg, varchar columns. Back-patch to 9.5 where this logic appeared. David Rowley, per report from Kim Rose Carlsen Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/VI1PR05MB17091F9A9876528055D6A827C76D0@VI1PR05MB1709.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com
* Fix possible dangling pointer dereference in trigger.c.Tom Lane2017-09-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | AfterTriggerEndQuery correctly notes that the query_stack could get repalloc'd during a trigger firing, but it nonetheless passes the address of a query_stack entry to afterTriggerInvokeEvents, so that if such a repalloc occurs, afterTriggerInvokeEvents is already working with an obsolete dangling pointer while it scans the rest of the events. Oops. The only code at risk is its "delete_ok" cleanup code, so we can prevent unsafe behavior by passing delete_ok = false instead of true. However, that could have a significant performance penalty, because the point of passing delete_ok = true is to not have to re-scan possibly a large number of dead trigger events on the next time through the loop. There's more than one way to skin that cat, though. What we can do is delete all the "chunks" in the event list except the last one, since we know all events in them must be dead. Deleting the chunks is work we'd have had to do later in AfterTriggerEndQuery anyway, and it ends up saving rescanning of just about the same events we'd have gotten rid of with delete_ok = true. In v10 and HEAD, we also have to be careful to mop up any per-table after_trig_events pointers that would become dangling. This is slightly annoying, but I don't think that normal use-cases will traverse this code path often enough for it to be a performance problem. It's pretty hard to hit this in practice because of the unlikelihood of the query_stack getting resized at just the wrong time. Nonetheless, it's definitely a live bug of ancient standing, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891.1505419542@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Ensure that BEFORE STATEMENT triggers fire the right number of times.Tom Lane2017-09-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 0f79440fb introduced mechanism to keep AFTER STATEMENT triggers from firing more than once per statement, which was formerly possible if more than one FK enforcement action had to be applied to a given table. Add a similar mechanism for BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, so that we don't have the unexpected situation of firing BEFORE STATEMENT triggers more often than AFTER STATEMENT. As with the previous patch, back-patch to v10. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22315.1505584992@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature.Tom Lane2017-09-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* After a MINVALUE/MAXVALUE bound, allow only more of the same.Robert Haas2017-09-15
| | | | | | | | | | In the old syntax, which used UNBOUNDED, we had a similar restriction, but commit d363d42bb9a4399a0207bd3b371c966e22e06bd3, which changed the syntax, eliminated it. Put it back. Patch by me, reviewed by Dean Rasheed. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobs+pLPC27tS3gOpEAxAffHrq5w509cvkwTf9pF6cWYbg@mail.gmail.com
* Apply pg_get_serial_sequence() to identity column sequences as wellPeter Eisentraut2017-09-15
| | | | Bug: #14813
* Add missing tags to GetCommandLogLevel.Robert Haas2017-09-14
| | | | | | | | | Otherwise, log_statement = 'ddl' causes errors if those statement types are used. Michael Paquier, reviewed by Ashutosh Sharma Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAB7nPqStC3HkE76Q1MnHsVd1vF1Td9zXApzYadzDMyLMRkkGrw@mail.gmail.com
* Fix inconsistent capitalization.Robert Haas2017-09-14
| | | | | | Amit Langote Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/a83a0899-19f5-594c-9aac-3ba0f16989a1@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Set partitioned_rels appropriately when UNION ALL is used.Robert Haas2017-09-14
| | | | | | | | | | In most cases, this omission won't matter, because the appropriate locks will have been acquired during parse/plan or by AcquireExecutorLocks. But it's a bug all the same. Report by Ashutosh Bapat. Patch by me, reviewed by Amit Langote. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRdHb_ZnoDTuBXqrudWXh3H1ibLkr6nHsCFT96fSK4DXtA@mail.gmail.com
* Properly check interrupts in execScan.c.Andres Freund2017-09-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | During the development of d47cfef711 the CFI()s in ExecScan() were moved back and forth, ending up in the wrong place. Thus queries that largely spend their time in ExecScan(), and have neither projection nor a qual, can't be cancelled in a timely manner. Reported-By: Jeff Janes Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1weDXp8eLLPt9SO1LEUsJYYK9cScaGhLKpuN+WbYo9b5g@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 10, as d47cfef711
* Fix ordering in pg_dump of GRANTsStephen Frost2017-09-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The order in which GRANTs are output is important as GRANTs which have been GRANT'd by individuals via WITH GRANT OPTION GRANTs have to come after the GRANT which included the WITH GRANT OPTION. This happens naturally in the backend during normal operation as we only change existing ACLs in-place, only add new ACLs to the end, and when removing an ACL we remove any which depend on it also. Also, adjust the comments in acl.h to make this clear. Unfortunately, the updates to pg_dump to handle initial privileges involved pulling apart ACLs and then combining them back together and could end up putting them back together in an invalid order, leading to dumps which wouldn't restore. Fix this by adjusting the queries used by pg_dump to ensure that the ACLs are rebuilt in the same order in which they were originally. Back-patch to 9.6 where the changes for initial privileges were done.
* Changed order of statements and added an additiona MSVC safeguard to make ecpgMichael Meskes2017-09-14
| | | | thread test cases work on Windows.
* Make setlocale in ECPG test cases thread aware on Windows.Michael Meskes2017-09-14
| | | | | | | Fix threaded test cases on Windows not to crash in setlocale() which can be global or local to a thread on Windows. Author: Christian Ullrich
* Improve error message in WAL senderPeter Eisentraut2017-09-13
| | | | | | | The previous error message when attempting to run a general SQL command in a physical replication WAL sender was a bit sloppy. Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
* Fix RecursiveCopy.pm to cope with disappearing files.Tom Lane2017-09-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When copying from an active database tree, it's possible for files to be deleted after we see them in a readdir() scan but before we can open them. (Once we've got a file open, we don't expect any further errors from it getting unlinked, though.) Tweak RecursiveCopy so it can cope with this case, so as to avoid irreproducible test failures. Back-patch to 9.6 where this code was added. In v10 and HEAD, also remove unused "use RecursiveCopy" in one recovery test script. Michael Paquier and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/24621.1504924323@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut2017-09-11
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 0c1fdae472e52197eb0e5ccdd2cfdd3654f76834
* Message style fixesPeter Eisentraut2017-09-11
|