From af8c580e5cf32bb85dde70083a260c93a1f783eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:12:02 -0400 Subject: Doc: be more precise about conflicts between relation names. Use verbiage like "The name of the table must be distinct from the name of any other relation (table, sequence, index, view, materialized view, or foreign table) in the same schema." in the reference pages for all those object types. The main change here is to mention materialized views explicitly; although a couple of these pages failed to say anything at all about name conflicts. Per suggestion from Daniel Westermann. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZR0P278MB0920D0946509233459AF0DEFD2889@ZR0P278MB0920.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM --- doc/src/sgml/ref/create_sequence.sgml | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc/src/sgml/ref/create_sequence.sgml') diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_sequence.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_sequence.sgml index e4085804a4d..20bdbc002fa 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_sequence.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_sequence.sgml @@ -46,8 +46,9 @@ CREATE [ TEMPORARY | TEMP ] SEQUENCE [ IF NOT EXISTS ]