From f7ea9312877abcb508669359fa2a05fc69ec91b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:03:35 +0000
Subject: Some minor code cleanup, falling out from the removal of rtree. 
 SK_NEGATE isn't being used anywhere anymore, and there seems no point in a
 generic index_keytest() routine when two out of three remaining access
 methods aren't using it.  Also, add a comment documenting a convention for
 letting access methods define private flag bits in ScanKey sk_flags. There
 are no such flags at the moment but I'm thinking about changing btree's
 handling of "required keys" to use flag bits in the keys rather than a count
 of required key positions.  Also, if some AM did still want SK_NEGATE then it
 would be reasonable to treat it as a private flag bit.

---
 src/backend/access/common/indexvalid.c | 78 ----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 78 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 src/backend/access/common/indexvalid.c

(limited to 'src/backend/access/common/indexvalid.c')

diff --git a/src/backend/access/common/indexvalid.c b/src/backend/access/common/indexvalid.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 29ee54c3bfe..00000000000
--- a/src/backend/access/common/indexvalid.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
-/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- *
- * indexvalid.c
- *	  index tuple qualification validity checking code
- *
- * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2005, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
- * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
- *
- *
- * IDENTIFICATION
- *	  $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/access/common/indexvalid.c,v 1.34 2005/06/24 00:18:52 tgl Exp $
- *
- *-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- */
-
-#include "postgres.h"
-
-#include "access/iqual.h"
-#include "executor/execdebug.h"
-
-/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
- *				  index scan key qualification code
- * ----------------------------------------------------------------
- */
-int			NIndexTupleProcessed;
-
-
-/* ----------------
- *		index_keytest - does this index tuple satisfy the scan key(s)?
- * ----------------
- */
-bool
-index_keytest(IndexTuple tuple,
-			  TupleDesc tupdesc,
-			  int scanKeySize,
-			  ScanKey key)
-{
-	IncrIndexProcessed();
-
-	while (scanKeySize > 0)
-	{
-		Datum		datum;
-		bool		isNull;
-		Datum		test;
-
-		datum = index_getattr(tuple,
-							  key->sk_attno,
-							  tupdesc,
-							  &isNull);
-
-		if (isNull)
-		{
-			/* XXX eventually should check if SK_ISNULL */
-			return false;
-		}
-
-		if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL)
-			return false;
-
-		test = FunctionCall2(&key->sk_func, datum, key->sk_argument);
-
-		if (key->sk_flags & SK_NEGATE)
-		{
-			if (DatumGetBool(test))
-				return false;
-		}
-		else
-		{
-			if (!DatumGetBool(test))
-				return false;
-		}
-
-		key++;
-		scanKeySize--;
-	}
-
-	return true;
-}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3