From c970292a94e0fff468d500db430d751b6221a0b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 22:34:57 +0000 Subject: Remove very ancient tuple-counting infrastructure (IncrRetrieved() and friends). This code has all been ifdef'd out for many years, and doesn't seem to have any prospect of becoming any more useful in the future. EXPLAIN ANALYZE is what people use in practice, and I think if we did want process-wide counters we'd be more likely to put in dtrace events for that than try to resurrect this code. Get rid of it so as to have one less detail to worry about while refactoring execMain.c. --- src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c') diff --git a/src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c b/src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c index e7ca8f64767..a094495b8a9 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c +++ b/src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California * * IDENTIFICATION - * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c,v 1.81 2009/06/11 14:48:53 momjian Exp $ + * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c,v 1.82 2009/10/08 22:34:57 tgl Exp $ * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ @@ -388,8 +388,6 @@ gistindex_keytest(IndexTuple tuple, giststate = so->giststate; p = BufferGetPage(so->curbuf); - IncrIndexProcessed(); - scan->xs_recheck = false; /* -- cgit v1.2.3