From 3e4818e9dd5be294d97ca67012528cb1c0b0ccaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Munro Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 12:52:08 +1300 Subject: Avoid unnecessary shm writes in Parallel Hash Join. Currently, Parallel Hash Join cannot be used for full/right joins, so there is no point in setting the match flag. It turns out that the cache coherence traffic generated by those writes slows down large systems running many-core joins, so let's stop doing that. In future, if we need to use match bits in parallel joins, we might want to consider setting them only if not already set. Back-patch to 11, where Parallel Hash Join arrived. Reported-by: Deng, Gang Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0F44E799048C4849BAE4B91012DB910462E9897A%40SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com --- src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c') diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c index 67c717910f5..c901a809236 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c @@ -454,7 +454,26 @@ ExecHashJoinImpl(PlanState *pstate, bool parallel) if (joinqual == NULL || ExecQual(joinqual, econtext)) { node->hj_MatchedOuter = true; - HeapTupleHeaderSetMatch(HJTUPLE_MINTUPLE(node->hj_CurTuple)); + + if (parallel) + { + /* + * Full/right outer joins are currently not supported + * for parallel joins, so we don't need to set the + * match bit. Experiments show that it's worth + * avoiding the shared memory traffic on large + * systems. + */ + Assert(!HJ_FILL_INNER(node)); + } + else + { + /* + * This is really only needed if HJ_FILL_INNER(node), + * but we'll avoid the branch and just set it always. + */ + HeapTupleHeaderSetMatch(HJTUPLE_MINTUPLE(node->hj_CurTuple)); + } /* In an antijoin, we never return a matched tuple */ if (node->js.jointype == JOIN_ANTI) -- cgit v1.2.3