From 4bc424b968058c7f0aa685821d7039e86faac99c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Haas Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 18:02:36 -0400 Subject: pgindent run for 9.6 --- src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c') diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c index e62c8aad657..af7b26c0ef0 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c @@ -1221,10 +1221,10 @@ ExecOnConflictUpdate(ModifyTableState *mtstate, /* * Note that it is possible that the target tuple has been modified in * this session, after the above heap_lock_tuple. We choose to not error - * out in that case, in line with ExecUpdate's treatment of similar - * cases. This can happen if an UPDATE is triggered from within - * ExecQual(), ExecWithCheckOptions() or ExecProject() above, e.g. by - * selecting from a wCTE in the ON CONFLICT's SET. + * out in that case, in line with ExecUpdate's treatment of similar cases. + * This can happen if an UPDATE is triggered from within ExecQual(), + * ExecWithCheckOptions() or ExecProject() above, e.g. by selecting from a + * wCTE in the ON CONFLICT's SET. */ /* Execute UPDATE with projection */ @@ -1595,7 +1595,7 @@ ExecInitModifyTable(ModifyTable *node, EState *estate, int eflags) /* Initialize the usesFdwDirectModify flag */ resultRelInfo->ri_usesFdwDirectModify = bms_is_member(i, - node->fdwDirectModifyPlans); + node->fdwDirectModifyPlans); /* * Verify result relation is a valid target for the current operation -- cgit v1.2.3