From ebd551f586a801dee426e49ba72fb213e8013890 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Haas Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 12:52:04 -0500 Subject: Update some incorrect comments about xlog records. The comments claim that certain pieces of data are part of the main WAL record data when in reality they are part of the data for block 0. Repair. Bertrand Drouvot, reviewed by Amit Kapila. Originally reported by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/80db7836-4415-d54a-64c3-66b88b1430e7@gmail.com --- src/include/access/gistxlog.h | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/include/access/gistxlog.h') diff --git a/src/include/access/gistxlog.h b/src/include/access/gistxlog.h index 09f9b0f8c67..2ce9366277d 100644 --- a/src/include/access/gistxlog.h +++ b/src/include/access/gistxlog.h @@ -52,9 +52,7 @@ typedef struct gistxlogDelete TransactionId snapshotConflictHorizon; uint16 ntodelete; /* number of deleted offsets */ - /* - * In payload of blk 0 : todelete OffsetNumbers - */ + /* TODELETE OFFSET NUMBER ARRAY FOLLOWS */ } gistxlogDelete; #define SizeOfGistxlogDelete (offsetof(gistxlogDelete, ntodelete) + sizeof(uint16)) -- cgit v1.2.3