From 1c49dae165bcee69bf3327d6ae20271d82cdf6bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Haas Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:35:55 -0400 Subject: "Pin", rather than "keep", dynamic shared memory mappings and segments. Nobody seemed concerned about this naming when it originally went in, but there's a pending patch that implements the opposite of dsm_keep_mapping, and the term "unkeep" was judged unpalatable. "unpin" has existing precedent in the PostgreSQL code base, and the English language, so use this terminology instead. Per discussion, back-patch to 9.4. --- src/include/storage/dsm_impl.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/include/storage/dsm_impl.h') diff --git a/src/include/storage/dsm_impl.h b/src/include/storage/dsm_impl.h index 6e2a0134119..32cfed2ee9c 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/dsm_impl.h +++ b/src/include/storage/dsm_impl.h @@ -73,6 +73,6 @@ extern bool dsm_impl_op(dsm_op op, dsm_handle handle, Size request_size, extern bool dsm_impl_can_resize(void); /* Implementation-dependent actions required to keep segment until shudown. */ -extern void dsm_impl_keep_segment(dsm_handle handle, void *impl_private); +extern void dsm_impl_pin_segment(dsm_handle handle, void *impl_private); #endif /* DSM_IMPL_H */ -- cgit v1.2.3