ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT
SQL - Language Statements
ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT
roll back to a savepoint
ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT
savepoints
rolling back
ROLLBACK [ WORK | TRANSACTION ] TO [ SAVEPOINT ] savepoint_name
Description
Roll back all commands that were executed after the savepoint was
established. The savepoint remains valid and can be rolled back to
again later, if needed.
ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT> implicitly destroys all savepoints that
were established after the named savepoint.
Parameters
savepoint_name>
The savepoint to roll back to.
Notes
Use to destroy a savepoint without
discarding the effects of commands executed after it was established.
Specifying a savepoint name that has not been established is an error.
Cursors have somewhat non-transactional behavior with respect to
savepoints. Any cursor that is opened inside a savepoint will be closed
when the savepoint is rolled back. If a previously opened cursor is
affected by a
FETCH> command inside a savepoint that is later rolled
back, the cursor position remains at the position that FETCH>
left it pointing to (that is, FETCH> is not rolled back).
Closing a cursor is not undone by rolling back, either.
A cursor whose execution causes a transaction to abort is put in a
can't-execute state, so while the transaction can be restored using
ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT>, the cursor can no longer be used.
Examples
To undo the effects of the commands executed after my_savepoint
was established:
ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT my_savepoint;
Cursor positions are not affected by savepoint rollback:
BEGIN;
DECLARE foo CURSOR FOR SELECT 1 UNION SELECT 2;
SAVEPOINT foo;
FETCH 1 FROM foo;
?column?
----------
1
ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT foo;
FETCH 1 FROM foo;
?column?
----------
2
COMMIT;
Compatibility
The SQL> standard specifies that the key word
SAVEPOINT> is mandatory, but PostgreSQL>
and Oracle> allow it to be omitted. SQL allows
only WORK>, not TRANSACTION>, as a noise word
after ROLLBACK>. Also, SQL has an optional clause
AND [ NO ] CHAIN> which is not currently supported by
PostgreSQL>. Otherwise, this command conforms to
the SQL standard.
See Also