aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>2007-01-13 15:13:44 +0000
committerBruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>2007-01-13 15:13:44 +0000
commit62c06186f55f7968f432bfc16ea2b6a7150698a6 (patch)
tree14a4c7c2fcfe4d75c36c5f802aa7e2943aca3e58
parent9a54b76b39b89de2f0238a9e4d570972cf758fd8 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-62c06186f55f7968f432bfc16ea2b6a7150698a6.tar.gz
postgresql-62c06186f55f7968f432bfc16ea2b6a7150698a6.zip
Remove completed items, and the last is unwanted:
< o Fix memory leak from exceptions < < http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-06/msg00305.php < < * Allow constraint_exclusion to work for UNIONs like it does for < inheritance, allow it to work for UPDATE and DELETE statements, and allow < it to be used for all statements with little performance impact < < * Add estimated_count(*) to return an estimate of COUNT(*) < < This would use the planner ANALYZE statistics to return an estimated < count. < http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php
-rw-r--r--doc/TODO15
-rw-r--r--doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html13
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/doc/TODO b/doc/TODO
index 6b9fd4bbcd5..1b68a55501d 100644
--- a/doc/TODO
+++ b/doc/TODO
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
PostgreSQL TODO List
====================
Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us)
-Last updated: Wed Jan 10 23:48:50 EST 2007
+Last updated: Sat Jan 13 10:13:24 EST 2007
The most recent version of this document can be viewed at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html.
@@ -680,10 +680,6 @@ SQL Commands
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-11/msg00045.php
- o Fix memory leak from exceptions
-
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-06/msg00305.php
-
o Fix problems with RETURN NEXT on tables with
dropped/added columns after function creation
@@ -897,9 +893,6 @@ Indexes
one column or expression indexes, perhaps using per-index statistics
* -Allow the creation of indexes with mixed ascending/descending
specifiers
-* Allow constraint_exclusion to work for UNIONs like it does for
- inheritance, allow it to work for UPDATE and DELETE statements, and allow
- it to be used for all statements with little performance impact
* Consider compressing indexes by storing key values duplicated in
several rows as a single index entry
@@ -979,12 +972,6 @@ Cache Usage
faster than a sequential scan it must avoid access to the heap
to obtain tuple visibility information.
-* Add estimated_count(*) to return an estimate of COUNT(*)
-
- This would use the planner ANALYZE statistics to return an estimated
- count.
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php
-
* Allow data to be pulled directly from indexes
Currently indexes do not have enough tuple visibility information
diff --git a/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html b/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html
index 42b23e22672..45e1b26546d 100644
--- a/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html
+++ b/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" link="#FF0000" vlink="#A00000" alink="#0000FF">
<h1><a name="section_1">PostgreSQL TODO List</a></h1>
<p>Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (<a href="mailto:bruce@momjian.us">bruce@momjian.us</a>)<br/>
-Last updated: Wed Jan 10 23:48:50 EST 2007
+Last updated: Sat Jan 13 10:13:24 EST 2007
</p>
<p>The most recent version of this document can be viewed at<br/>
<a href="http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html">http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html</a>.
@@ -615,9 +615,6 @@ first.
</li><li>Allow PL/RETURN to return row or record functions
<p> <a href="http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-11/msg00045.php">http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-11/msg00045.php</a>
</p>
- </li><li>Fix memory leak from exceptions
-<p> <a href="http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-06/msg00305.php">http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-06/msg00305.php</a>
-</p>
</li><li>Fix problems with RETURN NEXT on tables with
dropped/added columns after function creation
<p> <a href="http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-02/msg00165.php">http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-02/msg00165.php</a>
@@ -810,9 +807,6 @@ first.
one column or expression indexes, perhaps using per-index statistics
</li><li>-<em>Allow the creation of indexes with mixed ascending/descending</em>
specifiers
- </li><li>Allow constraint_exclusion to work for UNIONs like it does for
- inheritance, allow it to work for UPDATE and DELETE statements, and allow
- it to be used for all statements with little performance impact
</li><li>Consider compressing indexes by storing key values duplicated in
several rows as a single index entry
<p> This is difficult because it requires datatype-specific knowledge.
@@ -880,11 +874,6 @@ first.
faster than a sequential scan it must avoid access to the heap
to obtain tuple visibility information.
</p>
- </li><li>Add estimated_count(*) to return an estimate of COUNT(*)
-<p> This would use the planner ANALYZE statistics to return an estimated
- count.
- <a href="http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php">http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php</a>
-</p>
</li><li>Allow data to be pulled directly from indexes
<p> Currently indexes do not have enough tuple visibility information
to allow data to be pulled from the index without also accessing