Remove typmod checking from the recent security-related patches. It turns

out that ExecEvalVar and friends don't necessarily have access to a tuple
descriptor with correct typmod: it definitely can contain -1, and possibly
might contain other values that are different from the Var's value.
Arguably this should be cleaned up someday, but it's not a simple change,
and in any case typmod discrepancies don't pose a security hazard.
Per reports from numerous people :-(

I'm not entirely sure whether the failure can occur in 8.0 --- the simple
test cases reported so far don't trigger it there.  But back-patch the
change all the way anyway.

2 files changed, 11 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execQual.c b/src/backend/executor/execQual.c
index ab375a3ea36..b52067910b9 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/execQual.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/execQual.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
  *
  *
  * IDENTIFICATION
- *	  $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execQual.c,v 1.199.2.1 2007/02/02 00:07:27 tgl Exp $
+ *	  $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execQual.c,v 1.199.2.2 2007/02/06 17:35:27 tgl Exp $
  *
  *-------------------------------------------------------------------------
  */
@@ -485,8 +485,11 @@ ExecEvalVar(ExprState *exprstate, ExprContext *econtext,
 		 * Note: we allow a reference to a dropped attribute.  slot_getattr
 		 * will force a NULL result in such cases.
 		 *
-		 * Note: we check typmod, but allow the case that the Var has
-		 * unspecified typmod while the column has a specific typmod.
+		 * Note: ideally we'd check typmod as well as typid, but that seems
+		 * impractical at the moment: in many cases the tupdesc will have
+		 * been generated by ExecTypeFromTL(), and that can't guarantee to
+		 * generate an accurate typmod in all cases, because some expression
+		 * node types don't carry typmod.
 		 */
 		if (attnum > 0)
 		{
@@ -502,9 +505,7 @@ ExecEvalVar(ExprState *exprstate, ExprContext *econtext,
 			/* can't check type if dropped, since atttypid is probably 0 */
 			if (!attr->attisdropped)
 			{
-				if (variable->vartype != attr->atttypid ||
-					(variable->vartypmod != attr->atttypmod &&
-					 variable->vartypmod != -1))
+				if (variable->vartype != attr->atttypid)
 					ereport(ERROR,
 							(errmsg("attribute %d has wrong type", attnum),
 							 errdetail("Table has type %s, but query expects %s.",
@@ -3144,9 +3145,8 @@ ExecEvalFieldSelect(FieldSelectState *fstate,
 	}
 
 	/* Check for type mismatch --- possible after ALTER COLUMN TYPE? */
-	if (fselect->resulttype != attr->atttypid ||
-		(fselect->resulttypmod != attr->atttypmod &&
-		 fselect->resulttypmod != -1))
+	/* As in ExecEvalVar, we should but can't check typmod */
+	if (fselect->resulttype != attr->atttypid)
 		ereport(ERROR,
 				(errmsg("attribute %d has wrong type", fieldnum),
 				 errdetail("Table has type %s, but query expects %s.",
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c b/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c
index 909d9b198d0..1ef8300ba79 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
  *
  *
  * IDENTIFICATION
- *	  $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c,v 1.140.2.2 2007/02/02 00:07:28 tgl Exp $
+ *	  $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c,v 1.140.2.3 2007/02/06 17:35:27 tgl Exp $
  *
  *-------------------------------------------------------------------------
  */
@@ -632,10 +632,7 @@ ExecBuildProjectionInfo(List *targetList,
 			break;
 		}
 		attr = inputDesc->attrs[variable->varattno - 1];
-		if (attr->attisdropped ||
-			variable->vartype != attr->atttypid ||
-			(variable->vartypmod != attr->atttypmod &&
-			 variable->vartypmod != -1))
+		if (attr->attisdropped || variable->vartype != attr->atttypid)
 		{
 			isVarList = false;
 			break;