aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2021-11-08 11:14:56 -0500
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2021-11-08 11:14:56 -0500
commite65d9c8cd15a86207f1da387a9c917c93c14ea11 (patch)
tree03eaa1804a809c6ffe0e65125da5b2e31d5ebda7
parent9ae0f1112954989e955b4b29e4580216eccfcee4 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-e65d9c8cd15a86207f1da387a9c917c93c14ea11.tar.gz
postgresql-e65d9c8cd15a86207f1da387a9c917c93c14ea11.zip
libpq: reject extraneous data after SSL or GSS encryption handshake.
libpq collects up to a bufferload of data whenever it reads data from the socket. When SSL or GSS encryption is requested during startup, any additional data received with the server's yes-or-no reply remained in the buffer, and would be treated as already-decrypted data once the encryption handshake completed. Thus, a man-in-the-middle with the ability to inject data into the TCP connection could stuff some cleartext data into the start of a supposedly encryption-protected database session. This could probably be abused to inject faked responses to the client's first few queries, although other details of libpq's behavior make that harder than it sounds. A different line of attack is to exfiltrate the client's password, or other sensitive data that might be sent early in the session. That has been shown to be possible with a server vulnerable to CVE-2021-23214. To fix, throw a protocol-violation error if the internal buffer is not empty after the encryption handshake. Our thanks to Jacob Champion for reporting this problem. Security: CVE-2021-23222
-rw-r--r--doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml14
-rw-r--r--src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c13
2 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml
index 3a269640fcd..6a2d4a14fce 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml
@@ -1349,6 +1349,20 @@
</para>
<para>
+ When <acronym>SSL</acronym> encryption can be performed, the server
+ is expected to send only the single <literal>S</literal> byte and then
+ wait for the frontend to initiate an <acronym>SSL</acronym> handshake.
+ If additional bytes are available to read at this point, it likely
+ means that a man-in-the-middle is attempting to perform a
+ buffer-stuffing attack
+ (<ulink url="https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2021-23222/">CVE-2021-23222</ulink>).
+ Frontends should be coded either to read exactly one byte from the
+ socket before turning the socket over to their SSL library, or to
+ treat it as a protocol violation if they find they have read additional
+ bytes.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
An initial SSLRequest can also be used in a connection that is being
opened to send a CancelRequest message.
</para>
diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
index 18c09472bed..03b7cd60d39 100644
--- a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
+++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
@@ -2719,6 +2719,19 @@ keep_going: /* We will come back to here until there is
pollres = pqsecure_open_client(conn);
if (pollres == PGRES_POLLING_OK)
{
+ /*
+ * At this point we should have no data already buffered.
+ * If we do, it was received before we performed the SSL
+ * handshake, so it wasn't encrypted and indeed may have
+ * been injected by a man-in-the-middle.
+ */
+ if (conn->inCursor != conn->inEnd)
+ {
+ appendPQExpBufferStr(&conn->errorMessage,
+ libpq_gettext("received unencrypted data after SSL response\n"));
+ goto error_return;
+ }
+
/* SSL handshake done, ready to send startup packet */
conn->status = CONNECTION_MADE;
return PGRES_POLLING_WRITING;