diff options
author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2016-04-15 00:02:26 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2016-04-15 00:02:26 -0400 |
commit | edd57377f0db00a66d39029aa5239a96280887ef (patch) | |
tree | c9ea7dd627d9010d4e6a62e00784904a56bafcf0 | |
parent | 593f469a048f1479d19579a06ec32cce9ddfa190 (diff) | |
download | postgresql-edd57377f0db00a66d39029aa5239a96280887ef.tar.gz postgresql-edd57377f0db00a66d39029aa5239a96280887ef.zip |
Fix memory leak in GIN index scans.
The code had a query-lifespan memory leak when encountering GIN entries
that have posting lists (rather than posting trees, ie, there are a
relatively small number of heap tuples containing this index key value).
With a suitable data distribution this could add up to a lot of leakage.
Problem seems to have been introduced by commit 36a35c550, so back-patch
to 9.4.
Julien Rouhaud
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/access/gin/ginget.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/access/gin/ginget.c b/src/backend/access/gin/ginget.c index ee2eb633468..dcca7f4268f 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/gin/ginget.c +++ b/src/backend/access/gin/ginget.c @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ collectMatchBitmap(GinBtreeData *btree, GinBtreeStack *stack, ipd = ginReadTuple(btree->ginstate, scanEntry->attnum, itup, &nipd); tbm_add_tuples(scanEntry->matchBitmap, ipd, nipd, false); scanEntry->predictNumberResult += GinGetNPosting(itup); + pfree(ipd); } /* |