diff options
author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2018-01-12 15:46:37 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2018-01-12 15:46:37 -0500 |
commit | 680d540502609b422d378a1b8e0c10cac3c60084 (patch) | |
tree | d8790680d7cb56b0a1d47d39eeaeb493118852c6 /contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c | |
parent | 90947674fc984f5639e3b1bf013435a023aa713b (diff) | |
download | postgresql-680d540502609b422d378a1b8e0c10cac3c60084.tar.gz postgresql-680d540502609b422d378a1b8e0c10cac3c60084.zip |
Avoid unnecessary failure in SELECT concurrent with ALTER NO INHERIT.
If a query against an inheritance tree runs concurrently with an ALTER
TABLE that's disinheriting one of the tree members, it's possible to get
a "could not find inherited attribute" error because after obtaining lock
on the removed member, make_inh_translation_list sees that its columns
have attinhcount=0 and decides they aren't the columns it's looking for.
An ideal fix, perhaps, would avoid including such a just-removed member
table in the query at all; but there seems no way to accomplish that
without adding expensive catalog rechecks or creating a likelihood of
deadlocks. Instead, let's just drop the check on attinhcount. In this
way, a query that's included a just-disinherited child will still
succeed, which is not a completely unreasonable behavior.
This problem has existed for a long time, so back-patch to all supported
branches. Also add an isolation test verifying related behaviors.
Patch by me; the new isolation test is based on Kyotaro Horiguchi's work.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170626.174612.23936762.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions