Phase 2 of pgindent updates.

Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.

Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code.  The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there.  BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs.  So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before.  This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.

Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.

This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/contrib/xml2/xpath.c b/contrib/xml2/xpath.c
index acf1c4a1c11..a48818d944a 100644
--- a/contrib/xml2/xpath.c
+++ b/contrib/xml2/xpath.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(xml_is_well_formed);
 Datum
 xml_is_well_formed(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 {
-	text	   *t = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(0);		/* document buffer */
+	text	   *t = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(0);	/* document buffer */
 	bool		result = false;
 	int32		docsize = VARSIZE_ANY_EXHDR(t);
 	xmlDocPtr	doctree;
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ Datum
 xpath_nodeset(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 {
 	text	   *document = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(0);
-	text	   *xpathsupp = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(1);		/* XPath expression */
+	text	   *xpathsupp = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(1);	/* XPath expression */
 	xmlChar    *toptag = pgxml_texttoxmlchar(PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(2));
 	xmlChar    *septag = pgxml_texttoxmlchar(PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(3));
 	xmlChar    *xpath;
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ Datum
 xpath_list(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 {
 	text	   *document = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(0);
-	text	   *xpathsupp = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(1);		/* XPath expression */
+	text	   *xpathsupp = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(1);	/* XPath expression */
 	xmlChar    *plainsep = pgxml_texttoxmlchar(PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(2));
 	xmlChar    *xpath;
 	text	   *xpres;
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ Datum
 xpath_string(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 {
 	text	   *document = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(0);
-	text	   *xpathsupp = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(1);		/* XPath expression */
+	text	   *xpathsupp = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(1);	/* XPath expression */
 	xmlChar    *xpath;
 	int32		pathsize;
 	text	   *xpres;
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ Datum
 xpath_number(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 {
 	text	   *document = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(0);
-	text	   *xpathsupp = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(1);		/* XPath expression */
+	text	   *xpathsupp = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(1);	/* XPath expression */
 	xmlChar    *xpath;
 	float4		fRes;
 	xmlXPathObjectPtr res;
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ Datum
 xpath_bool(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 {
 	text	   *document = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(0);
-	text	   *xpathsupp = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(1);		/* XPath expression */
+	text	   *xpathsupp = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(1);	/* XPath expression */
 	xmlChar    *xpath;
 	int			bRes;
 	xmlXPathObjectPtr res;