aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexander Korotkov <akorotkov@postgresql.org>2019-03-24 15:26:45 +0300
committerAlexander Korotkov <akorotkov@postgresql.org>2019-03-24 15:41:32 +0300
commite23d44016d5193bb824fd637d277cbaa1fc6002c (patch)
tree68dfb5612d6c0dc03d3957233e2481429585a0f7 /src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c
parent581b890c283b6b1b00b580ba261488d6b9bbf21c (diff)
downloadpostgresql-e23d44016d5193bb824fd637d277cbaa1fc6002c.tar.gz
postgresql-e23d44016d5193bb824fd637d277cbaa1fc6002c.zip
Fix WAL format incompatibility introduced by backpatching of 52ac6cd2d0
52ac6cd2d0 added new field to ginxlogDeletePage and was backpatched to 9.4. That led to problems when patched postgres instance applies WAL records generated by non-patched one. WAL records generated by non-patched instance don't contain new field, which patched one is expecting to see. Thankfully, we can distinguish patched and non-patched WAL records by their data size. If we see that WAL record is generated by non-patched instance, we skip processing of new field. This commit comes with some assertions. In particular, if it appears that on some platform struct data size didn't change then static assertion will trigger. Reported-by: Simon Riggs Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANP8%2Bj%2BK4whxf7ET7%2BgO%2BG-baC3-WxqqH%3DnV4X2CgfEPA3Yu3g%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov Reviewed-by: Simon Riggs, Alvaro Herrera Backpatch-through: 9.4
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c19
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c b/src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c
index 291f22ef77f..b86990f3ac7 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c
@@ -531,7 +531,24 @@ ginRedoDeletePage(XLogReaderState *record)
page = BufferGetPage(dbuffer);
Assert(GinPageIsData(page));
GinPageGetOpaque(page)->flags = GIN_DELETED;
- GinPageSetDeleteXid(page, data->deleteXid);
+
+ /*
+ * deleteXid field of ginxlogDeletePage was added during backpatching.
+ * But, non-backpatched instances will continue generate WAL without
+ * this field. We should be able to correctly apply that. We can
+ * distinguish new WAL records by size their data, because
+ * ginxlogDeletePage changes its size on both 32-bit and 64-bit
+ * platforms.
+ */
+ StaticAssertStmt(sizeof(ginxlogDeletePage) !=
+ sizeof(ginxlogDeletePageOld),
+ "ginxlogDeletePage size should be changed "
+ "with addition of deleteXid field");
+ Assert(XLogRecGetDataLen(record) == sizeof(ginxlogDeletePage) ||
+ XLogRecGetDataLen(record) == sizeof(ginxlogDeletePageOld));
+ if (XLogRecGetDataLen(record) == sizeof(ginxlogDeletePage))
+ GinPageSetDeleteXid(page, data->deleteXid);
+
PageSetLSN(page, lsn);
MarkBufferDirty(dbuffer);
}